Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Ecology

PCR Bias in Ecological Analysis: a Case Study for Quantitative Taq Nuclease Assays in Analyses of Microbial Communities

Sven Becker, Peter Böger, Ralfh Oehlmann, Anneliese Ernst
Sven Becker
Lehrstuhl für Physiologie und Biochemie der Pflanzen, Universität Konstanz, Constance, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Böger
Lehrstuhl für Physiologie und Biochemie der Pflanzen, Universität Konstanz, Constance, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralfh Oehlmann
PE Biosystems, Weiterstadt, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anneliese Ernst
NIOO-Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology, Yerseke, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4945-4953.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    TaqMan probes used in this study. Shown are the positions of reporter (R) and quencher (Q) of probes S8807 (A) and S8807A (B) and alignment with complementary strands of target sequences in Synechococcus (Syn.) sp. strains BO 8807, BO 8808, BO 9404, and BO 8805. Mismatches are in boldface and in italics.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Ethidium bromide-stained PCR products from end point TNAs. Two-microliter volumes were analyzed in a 1% agarose gel. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested with PstI; 1 to 4, DNAs fromSynechococcus sp. strains BO 8807, BO 8808, BO 8805, and BO 9404; 5, A. variabilis strain ATCC 29413; 6,Synechocystis sp. strain BO 8402; 7, Microcystissp.; 8, E. coli strain K-12; 9, Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120; 10, no-template control; 11 to 14,Synechococcus spp. Assay mixtures (25 μl) contained 0.625 U of Taq polymerase and primers PITSANF and PITSEND (200 nM each), amplifying the ITS-1 in the ribosomal operon of many cyanobacteria. The assay mixtures analyzed in lanes 1 to 9 contained 10 ng of DNA, 1.5 mM Mg2+, and 20 nM probe S8807. The assay mixtures analyzed in lanes 11 to 14 contained 1 ng of DNA, 2.5 mM Mg2+, and 50 nM probe S8807A. Templates were amplified in 30 cycles using a two-step PCR program (3 min of annealing and polymerization at 59°C, denaturation at 94°C).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Melting curves of probes S8807 and S8807A. The melting behavior of two TaqMan probes hybridizing to template DNAs fromSynechococcus spp. strains BO 8807 and BO 8808 was analyzed by end point TNA. PCR conditions: 1 ng of template DNA, 50 nM probe (S8807 or S8807A), 2.5 mM Mg2+, 0.625 U of Taqpolymerase, 50 nM primers PITSANF and PITSEND at annealing-extension temperatures of 56 to 65°C, 200 nM at 66 and 67°C, 400 nM at 68 and 69°C, and 800 nM at 70°C. Cycling conditions: 1.5 min of annealing-polymerization, 30 cycles.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Quantification of DNA from Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 by end point TNA. Twenty-five-microliter Taqnuclease assay mixtures contained 10−3 to 103ng of DNA, representing approximately 3 × 102 to 3 × 108 genome copies of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807; 50 nM primers PITSANF and PITSEND; 50 nM probe S8807A; 2.5 mM Mg2+; and 0.625 U of Taq polymerase. PCR conditions: annealing-polymerization at 60°C for 1.5 min, 30 cycles. The insert shows a 1% agarose gel containing 2 μl of each assay mixture per lane. PCR products were stained with ethidium bromide. Lanes M, λ DNA digested with PstI.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Standard curves obtained by theCT method in real-time PCR. For TNA, 25-μl assay mixtures contained approximately 100 to 107 (108) copies of genomes, 12.5 μl of TaqMan universal PCR master mix (5 mM [final concentration] Mg2+), 300 nM primers, and 50 nM probe. Target DNA, primers (P), and probes (S) in panel A: A. nidulans, P100PA and P3, S100A. Target DNA, primers, and probes in panel B,Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807, P8807AP and P8807AM, S8807A. The PCR comprised 45 cycles with 1 min at 60°C for annealing-polymerization and 15 s of denaturation at 95°C. Fluorescence threshold (ΔRQ) = 0.04; s = slope. Amplification efficiency was calculated as follows: ɛc = 10−1/s − 1.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Competitive end point TNA. Assay mixtures contained 1 ng of genomic DNA from Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 and 10−3 to 103 ng of DNA fromSynechococcus sp. strain BO 8808, A. nidulans, or herring sperm. The PCR assay conditions comprised 30 cycles with annealing and extension at 60°C (1.5 min), 50 nM primers PITSANF and PITSEND was used for amplification of ITS-1, and 50 nM probe S8807A was used to detect strain BO 8807. Controls: Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 only.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    For quantitative PCR, a 25-μl TNA mixture contained 1 ng of genomic DNA from Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 and 10−3 to 102 ng of DNA from A. nidulans (lanes 1 to 6) or 1 ng of DNA fromSynechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 and A. nidulansalone (lanes 7 and 8, respectively). The assay conditions are described in the legend to Fig. 6. A 2-μl volume of each assay mixture was analyzed on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. λ DNA digested with PstI was used as molecular size markers (lanes M). Lane C, no-template control.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Real-time competitive PCR (A) and correspondingCT values (B). Assay mixtures contained approximately 103 copies of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 DNA (control) and approximately 100 to 108 copies of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8809 as a competitor, 300 nM primers P8807AM and P8807PE, 50 nM probe S8807A, and 12.5 μl of TaqMan universal PCR master mix (5 mM [final concentration] Mg2+). The assays were run for 45 cycles with 1 min of annealing and extension at 60°C and 15 s of denaturation at 95°C. The threshold was set to ΔRQ= 0.04. The control was Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 only.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Detection of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 DNA in the presence of similar DNA (7% sequence divergence in the ITS-1) using PCR primer P8807AP. Approximately 100 to 108 copies of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8809 DNA were added to approximately 101 (■), 102(□), or 103 (●) genome copies ofSynechococcus sp. strain BO 8807. The control wasSynechococcus sp. strain BO 8807 only. A 25-μl TNA mixture contained the DNA, 300 nM primers P8807AP and P8807AM, 50 nM probe S8807A, and 12.5 μl of TaqMan universal PCR master mix (5 mM [final concentration] Mg2+). The PCR comprised 45 cycles of 1 min of annealing-polymerization at 60°C and 15 s of denaturation at 95°C. The threshold value ΔRQ was 0.04.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Primers and probes used in TNAs

    Primer or probeaSequence (5′→3′)bTm(°C)c
    Primers
     PITSANFCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTAC50
     PITSENDCTCTGTGTGCCAAGGTATC50
     P8807APCATTCTTGACAAGTTAACCAGTTAGCTG60
     P8807AMCAAGGTTCTGCTGACATTCAAACA60
     P8807PEGTGATCTTGACTGTTGTTCGCTGA60
     P100PAGGTTTAGCTCAGTTGGTAGAGCGC61
     P3TTGGATGGAGGTTAGCGGACT60
    Probes
     S8807R–ATTTGTGCT–QCTCGGCTTTACCCGC67
     S8807AR–TCTCCAGGGCAGCATTGAATCCAG–Q67
     S100AR–CTTTGCAAGCAGGATGTCAGCGGTT–Q68
    • ↵a Primers and probes were designed to match complementary sequences in Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807.

    • ↵b The localization of the fluorescent dyes of the probes is indicated by the letters R (reporter, FAM) and Q (quencher, TAMRA).

    • ↵c Tm was calculated using Primer Express primer design software (see Materials and Methods).

  • Table 2.

    Comparison of the amount of amplified DNA and the fluorescence signal in end point TNAsa with probes S8807 and S8807A

    Expt and templatebAmplified DNAProbedFluorescence signal
    Arbitrary areac%Avg arbitrary ΔRQ ± SD%
    A
     BO 88077.192.2S88071.02 ± 0.17100
     BO 88087.394.8S88070.22 ± 0.0621.6
     BO 88057.192.2S88070.02 ± 0.042.0
     BO 94047.394.8S88070.17 ± 0.0416.7
     A. variabilis NDeNDS88070.03 ± 0.022.9
     BO 84024.659.7S88070.01 ± 0.031.0
     Microcystissp.7.7100S88070 ± 0.040
     E. coli00S88070 ± 0.080
     Anabaena strain PCC 7120NDNDS88070.01 ± 0.031.0
     None00S88070
    B
     BO 88076.288.6S8807A0.8 ± 0.02100
     BO 88085.984.3S8807A−0.01 ± 0.04
     BO 88055.477.1S8807A−0.03 ± 0.04
     BO 94047.0100S8807A0.02 ± 0.032.5
    • ↵a See Fig. 2.

    • ↵b Template DNA (10 ng in experiment A, 1 ng in experiment B) was obtained from Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8805, BO 8807, BO 8808, and BO 9404; Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8402; two Anabaena strains; Microcystissp.; and E. coli.

    • ↵c Area of ethidium bromide-stained PCR product (see Materials and Methods).

    • ↵d Probe concentrations, 20 (S8807) and 50 (S8807A) nM.

    • ↵e ND, three PCR products, areas not determined.

  • Table 3.

    Decrease in amplification efficiency caused by coamplified competitor DNA in a real-time competitive PCRa

    Competitor DNA copy no.bAvgKmc ± SDAvg ɛd ± SD
     00.1012 ± 0.00180.7166 ± 0.0036
    1000.0926 ± 0.00310.6983 ± 0.0071
    1010.0849 ± 0.00550.6793 ± 0.0140
    1020.0901 ± 0.00330.6925 ± 0.0076
    1030.0543 ± 0.00210.5757 ± 0.0095
    1040.0183 ± 0.00030.3143 ± 0.0036
    1050.0094 ± 0.00040.1896 ± 0.0068
    1060.0084 ± 0.00000.1736 ± 0.0004
    1070.0124 ± 0.00110.2364 ± 0.0162
    1080.0120 ± 0.00120.2300 ± 0.0181
    • ↵a See Fig. 8.

    • ↵b All reaction mixtures contained 103 genomic copies of Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8807, which is detected by specific TaqMan probe S8807A, and variable amounts of competitor DNA (Synechococcus sp. strain BO 8809), as indicated. The competitor was not detected by the TaqMan probe (see Fig. 8 for details).

    • ↵c Km was derived from a nonlinear least-squares fit of the PCR between cycles 1 and 35 using the equation ΔRQ(i+1) = ΔRQi[1 +Km(ΔRQi + Km)−1].

    • ↵d Amplification efficiency at a fluorescence threshold (ΔRQ) of 0.04 was calculated as follows: ɛ =Km(0.04 +Km−1).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
PCR Bias in Ecological Analysis: a Case Study for Quantitative Taq Nuclease Assays in Analyses of Microbial Communities
Sven Becker, Peter Böger, Ralfh Oehlmann, Anneliese Ernst
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2000, 66 (11) 4945-4953; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4945-4953.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PCR Bias in Ecological Analysis: a Case Study for Quantitative Taq Nuclease Assays in Analyses of Microbial Communities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
PCR Bias in Ecological Analysis: a Case Study for Quantitative Taq Nuclease Assays in Analyses of Microbial Communities
Sven Becker, Peter Böger, Ralfh Oehlmann, Anneliese Ernst
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2000, 66 (11) 4945-4953; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4945-4953.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteria
Ecosystem
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Taq Polymerase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336