Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Degradation of n-Hexadecane and Its Metabolites by Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Microaerobic and Anaerobic Denitrifying Conditions

Chawala Chayabutra, Lu-Kwang Ju
Chawala Chayabutra
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3906
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu-Kwang Ju
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3906
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.493-498.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A strategy for sequential hydrocarbon bioremediation is proposed. The initial O2-requiring transformation is effected by aerobic resting cells, thus avoiding a high oxygen demand. The oxygenated metabolites can then be degraded even under anaerobic conditions when supplemented with a highly water-soluble alternative electron acceptor, such as nitrate. To develop the new strategy, some phenomena were studied by examining Pseudomonas aeruginosafermentation. The effects of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration onn-hexadecane biodegradation were investigated first. Under microaerobic conditions, the denitrification rate decreased as the DO concentration decreased, implying that the O2-requiring reactions were rate limiting. The effects of different nitrate and nitrite concentrations were examined next. When cultivated aerobically in tryptic soy broth supplemented with 0 to 0.35 g of NO2−-N per liter, cells grew in all systems, but the lag phase was longer in the presence of higher nitrite concentrations. However, under anaerobic denitrifying conditions, even 0.1 g of NO2−-N per liter totally inhibited cell growth. Growth was also inhibited by high nitrate concentrations (>1 g of NO3−-N per liter). Cells were found to be more sensitive to nitrate or nitrite inhibition under denitrifying conditions than under aerobic conditions. Sequential hexadecane biodegradation by P. aeruginosa was then investigated. The initial fermentation was aerobic for cell growth and hydrocarbon oxidation to oxygenated metabolites, as confirmed by increasing dissolved total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations. The culture was then supplemented with nitrate and purged with nitrogen (N2). Nitrate was consumed rapidly initially. The live cell concentration, however, also decreased. The aqueous-phase TOC level decreased by about 40% during the initial active period but remained high after this period. Additional experiments confirmed that only about one-half of the derived TOC was readily consumable under anaerobic denitrifying conditions.

Petroleum hydrocarbons are among the most common environmental contaminants (8). Much work has been done to understand the aerobic and anaerobic pathways of microbial hydrocarbon degradation (9, 29). Although desirable for active hydrocarbon biodegradation, completely aerobic conditions are hard to implement in the field because of the low solubility of oxygen in water (5, 42). Hydrogen peroxide can provide more oxygen (20). However, hydrogen peroxide may oxidize cellular components by forming singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals (29), and using hydrogen peroxide requires special operational design and handling. Moreover, peroxide can form precipitates with soil components, such as metallic compounds, thus decreasing aquifer permeability (11, 30, 40).

It is plausible that uneven distribution of water flow, nutrients, and microbial populations creates a dynamic spectrum of aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic conditions. The ability of microorganisms to degrade hydrocarbons under strictly anaerobic conditions is very limited. It is practically absent for aliphatics compounds; there are extremely rare exceptions to this (10, 13, 36). The ability to degrade aromatic compounds under anaerobic conditions is limited to a few strains, and the degradation is typically much slower than aerobic degradation (4, 15, 24). The initial anaerobic transformation of aromatic compounds has been shown to be oxidative hydroxylation, with the oxygen being derived from water (1, 22), which is a much less thermodynamically favorable reaction than oxidation by O2.

The limitation described above indicates the importance of molecular oxygen (O2) as a direct reactant in hydrocarbon catabolism (e.g., in the initial conversion to alcohol) (29). Although other oxidants, such as NO3− or NO2− (in denitrification), Fe(III), Mn(IV), sulfate, and CO2 (in methanogenesis) (17, 29), can be used by many microorganisms as terminal electron acceptors that replace O2 in respiration, they cannot replace O2 as a direct reactant. Consequently, most anaerobic biodegradation is observed with oxygenated derivatives (e.g., alcohols, aldehydes, acids, phenolic compounds, and amino acids) (3, 16).

Therefore, petroleum bioremediation should address (i) the dual roles of O2 in biodegradation (i.e., for respiration and as a direct reactant) and (ii) the interactions of microbial activities in different environments (aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic environments). Sequential biodegradation of hydrocarbons probably occurs in nature; the initial O2-requiring oxidation occurs under aerobic or microaerobic conditions, and the subsequent mineralization may proceed even under anaerobic conditions. The same strategy may be used as an advanced bioremediation approach. The initial oxidation (transformation) is effected by aerobic resting cells in a first remediation stage without promoting active growth that may cause undeliverable oxygen demand and plugging of soil pores by overpopulated microbes. The oxidized metabolites are then degraded under the conditions of stimulated microbial activities where the respiration needs are met by adding a highly water-soluble alternative electron acceptor, such as nitrate.

In this work we studied sequential metabolism ofn-hexadecane by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which is among the most commonly isolated microorganisms in petroleum-contaminated soils and groundwater (34). It is known that P. aeruginosa mineralizes aliphatic compounds.P. aeruginosa strains that attack aromatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons have also been isolated, including a pyrene-degrading strain that was recently isolated in our lab (33). P. aeruginosa strains are typically active denitrifiers and produce biosurfactants (rhamnolipids) when they are grown on hydrophobic substrates (18, 41). Compared to other anaerobic respiration mechanisms, denitrification is more favorable energetically, and benign nitrogen (N2) is the predominant product of this process (17, 29). The rhamnolipids produced are also very beneficial to bioremediation, because they solubilize and mobilize hydrocarbons and other non-aqueous-phase liquids into the aqueous phase, where they can be biodegraded or removed by advective transport (2, 37).

Because they are hydrophobic, hydrocarbons in the environment are often adsorbed or trapped in pores by capillary action; thus, they are not readily accessible to microbes (26). Some microorganisms produce extracellular biosurfactants that solubilize and facilitate the penetration of hydrocarbons through the hydrophilic cell wall; then the hydrocarbons can be degraded by enzymes integrated in the cytoplasmic membrane (39). The most important examples of such organisms are the rhamnolipid-producing Pseudomonas species (28, 44) and the sophorolipid-producing Torulopsis species (21). The biosurfactants of these species are extremely effective and create low surface tensions at much lower concentrations than those required for synthetic surfactants (14).

It should be noted that rhamnolipids are actively synthesized by stationary-phase or resting P. aeruginosa cultures (44). Therefore, they are also produced during the first stage of the proposed sequential bioremediation process and contribute to mobilizing and solubilizing the contaminants during the subsequent mineralization stage. Because P. aeruginosa has these versatile, unique metabolic characteristics, it is the most suitable species for initial studies of sequential hydrocarbon metabolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microorganism and medium.A pure culture of P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145 was maintained on tryptic soy agar slants (30 g of tryptic soy broth [TSB] per liter, 1.5% agar) and was subcultured regularly. To prepare an inoculum, a loopful of cells from an agar slant was first transferred into a test tube containing 10 ml of TSB and incubated at 35°C for 24 h. For studies in which TSB or glucose medium (basal medium [see below] containing 2 g of glucose per liter) was used, the cells were transferred and grown in 50 ml of TSB at 30°C for 2 days with magnetic stirring at 300 rpm before they were used as the inoculum. For the experiments in whichn-hexadecane was the carbon substrate, the cells in 10 ml of TSB were harvested by centrifugation and added to a 500-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 ml of basal medium supplemented with 5 ml of hexadecane; the pH of this medium was adjusted to 7.0. The culture was incubated for 7 days with magnetic stirring at 30°C and then subcultured again in the hexadecane-containing medium for another 4 days before it was used as the inoculum. The basal medium contained (per liter) 4.0 g of NH4Cl, 2.5 g of K2HPO4, 0.5 g of NaCl, 0.3 g of MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.03 g of FeCl3 · 6H2O, 0.01 g of CaCl2, and 0.01 g of MnCl2 · 4H2O.

Experimental setup and procedures. (i) Microaerobic denitrification and hexadecane metabolism: effect of oxygen concentration.To study the full spectrum of aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic conditions in soil, we performed experiments to confirm the existence of microaerobic denitrification and the effects of low oxygen concentrations on hexadecane metabolism by P. aeruginosa. Different volumes of an inoculated growth medium containing hexadecane, nitrate, and ammonium were added to nine 50-ml vials. An excess of ammonium (0.65 g of NH4+-N per liter) was present to ensure that the nitrate was consumed only for respiration, because the assimilatory nitrate reductases are repressed by ammonium (27). The vials were stirred at the same speed (100 rpm) by using a multipoint electromagnetic stirrer. The caps on vials 1 through 5 were loosened slightly in order to allow gas phase diffusion. Vials 6 through 9 were tightly capped. Since the gas-liquid interfacial areas were the same, the increasing medium volume from vial 1 to vial 5 resulted in a decreasing trend in dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Vials 6 through 9 were the most anaerobic vials; the headspaces in these vials were very small, and there was no gas replenishment. Resazurin, a common redox indicator, was added in order to determine the extent of anaerobiosis; this compound is colorless under anaerobic conditions and pink under aerobic conditions (29). The resultant color confirmed the decreasing DO concentration trend. Samples were taken periodically and used for nitrate analysis.

(ii) Effects of nitrate and nitrite concentrations.Two sets of experiments were performed to study the effects of nitrate and/or nitrite concentrations on the growth of P. aeruginosa under aerobic conditions and under anaerobic denitrifying conditions. The experiments were conducted at room temperature (22 ± 1°C). TSB containing various initial concentrations of nitrite (0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, and 0.35 g of NO2−-N per liter) were used for the aerobic experiments. The denitrifying experiments were performed with glucose media containing either nitrate alone (0.5, 1, 2, 3, or 4 g of NO3−-N per liter) or 0.5 g of NO3−-N per liter plus 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 g of NO2−-N per liter. Very pure sodium nitrate (>99.9% pure; Sigma) was used to minimize the accompanying residual nitrite content. The aerobic experiments were performed with shallow medium (4 ml of medium) that was vigorously shaken (∼250 rpm) in culture tubes capped with stainless steel closures that allowed good gas exchange. On the other hand, the tubes used for the anaerobic denitrifying experiments were tightly capped, filled with 10 ml of medium, and shaken gently at ∼60 rpm. The broth optical density at 460 nm was measured with a Spectronic 20 colorimeter (Bausch & Lomb) in order to determine cell concentrations.

(iii) Hexadecane metabolism in the sequential aerobic and anaerobic denitrifying process.Experiments were carried out at 30°C in 2-liter Erlenmeyer flasks containing 800 ml of basal medium supplemented with 0.7% (vol/vol) hexadecane; the medium was magnetically stirred at 400 rpm. Initially, fermentation was carried out with surface aeration; a slow flow of filter-sterilized air through the reactor headspace resulted in cell growth and stationary-phase hydrocarbon oxidation to oxygenated metabolites, including rhamnolipids. The pH was controlled at 6.5 to 6.7 by automatic addition of 2 N NaOH during this period. Surface aeration was used instead of submerged air sparging in order to avoid severe foaming due to biosurfactant production. The culture was then driven to anaerobic denitrifying conditions by purging nitrogen (N2) and adding NaNO3. Ammonium (0.08 g of NH4Cl per liter) was also added to ensure that nitrate was consumed only for respiration and not for assimilation. Before the N2 was introduced into the fermentor, it was passed through an oversaturated NaSO3solution in order to minimize the residual oxygen content. N2 purging was performed periodically during anaerobic cultivation, especially after each sample was removed. Because denitrification led to an increase in pH, the pH of the anaerobic culture was controlled by automatic addition of 2 N HCl.

Analytical methods.The cell protein and rhamnolipid concentrations were measured by standard Lowry and anthrone methods, respectively, as described previously (44). A total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (model TOC-5000A; Shimadzu) was used to measure the TOC content in the aqueous phase after a sample (10 ml) had been extracted with hexane to remove hexadecane. Hexadecane contents were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography by using a normal-phase Supelcosil LC-Si column (25 cm by 4.6 mm by 5 μm) and a refractive index detector (model HP 1047A). The mobile phase wasn-hexane at a flow rate of 1.0 ml per min.

Ammonium (NH4+) and combined nitrate and nitrite (NOx−) concentrations were determined by using an ammonia electrode (model M-44325; Markson Science) (12, 25). A wide range of the ammonium concentrations (1 to 1,000 mg of NH4+-N per liter) could be measured accurately, while only nitrate and nitrite concentrations ranging from 1 to 20 mg of NOx−-N per liter could be measured. Therefore, each sample was diluted to the proper range prior to the analysis. For the separate nitrite analysis we used the standard method described by Gerhardt (19); 0.1 ml of the sulfanilamide reagent (1% sulfanilamide and 10% HCl; LabChem Inc.) was added to a 5-ml sample in a test tube, and then the preparation was mixed and kept in the dark for 2 to 8 min. Then 0.1 ml of theN-1(naphthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride reagent (0.1%; LabChem Inc.) was added, and the preparation was mixed and left to stand for at least 10 min. The absorbance at 543 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Microaerobic denitrification and hexadecane metabolism: effect of oxygen concentration.The nitrate consumption profiles obtained with vials containing different DO concentrations are summarized in Fig. 1. Denitrification clearly occurred under the microaerobic conditions studied. This finding is consistent with the previous report that the bacteria in a groundwater microcosm ignored O2 at levels that were less than 8% of air saturation and switched to other electron acceptors (6). Denitrification in the presence of even higher DO levels, termed aerobic denitrification, has also been reported for several species and strains (32, 38, 43).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Increase of the denitrification rate with increasing DO concentration during n-hexadecane metabolism by P. aeruginosa under microaerobic conditions. Symbols: ●, vial 1; ■, vial 2; ▾, vial 3; ◊, vial 4; □, vial 5; ▵, vial 6.

More surprisingly, the denitrification rate decreased as the DO concentration decreased. This phenomenon could be attributed to slower hexadecane oxidation as the DO concentration decreased at the very low DO concentrations used. As mentioned above, biodegradation of aliphatic hydrocarbons requires O2 as a direct reactant, as in the initial conversion to alcohol. As the DO concentration decreased, the rate of hydrocarbon oxidation was limited, which in turn slowed the electron donation which drove the electron-accepting denitrification process.

On the other hand, oxygen repression and inhibition of denitrifying enzymes should occur at high DO concentrations (27). Therefore, as shown schematically in Fig.2, the dependence of nitrate respiration on DO concentration may be controlled by two different mechanisms; it may be hydrocarbon oxidation limited at low DO concentrations and oxygen repression-inhibition limited at high DO concentrations. The denitrification rate for oxygenated, anaerobically degradable substrates (such as glucose and fatty acids) probably always decreases as the DO concentration decreases because of the prevailing oxygen repression-inhibition effect (Fig. 2). More studies are required to confirm and quantitatively evaluate the profiles shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Proposed dependence of the denitrification rate ofP. aeruginosa on DO concentration for different substrates. In addition to the well-known oxygen repression and inhibition, the denitrification rate is also subject to the limitation of electron donation from O2-requiring hydrocarbon oxidation at very low DO concentrations.

Effects of nitrate and nitrite concentrations.Denitrification by P. aeruginosa is known to involve sequential reduction of nitrate (NO3−) to nitrite (NO2−), nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and nitrogen (N2) (23). Accumulation of intermediate NO2− during the initial denitrifying period has been observed (7), because nitrate reductases are first induced by the nitrate added and then the nitrite formed from nitrate reduction induces expression of nitrite reductases. Before nitrite reductases are fully synthesized, transient nitrite accumulation is likely to occur. Nitrite is, however, highly toxic (31) and may cause cell death or metabolic inhibition when denitrification is used for sequential bioremediation. Therefore, we examined P. aeruginosa growth in the presence of various nitrite and/or nitrate concentrations.

The optical densities at 460 nm of cultures grown aerobically in TSB supplemented with 0 to 0.35 g of NO2−-N per liter are shown in Fig. 3. Cells were able to grow in all systems, but the lag phases were longer at higher nitrite concentrations. The results obtained under anaerobic denitrifying conditions when glucose medium was used are shown in Fig.4. The presence of nitrite, even at a concentration of 0.1 g of NO2−-N per liter, completely inhibited cell growth. Higher nitrate concentrations also retarded cell growth, probably by inhibiting (or repressing) the nitrite reductases and thus causing nitrite to accumulate to inhibitory levels in the systems (35). P. aeruginosa was found to be more sensitive to nitrate-nitrite inhibition under anaerobic denitrifying conditions than under aerobic conditions.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of nitrite concentration on aerobic growth ofP. aeruginosa in TSB. OD460, optical density at 460 nm.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effects of nitrite and/or nitrate concentrations on growth of P. aeruginosa in a glucose-based medium under anaerobic denitrifying conditions. OD460, optical density at 460 nm.

Hexadecane metabolism in sequential aerobic and anaerobic denitrifying processes.The results obtained in a typical experiment carried out under sequential aerobic and anaerobic denitrifying conditions are shown in Fig.5. The cell growth profile corresponded very well to the ammonium consumption profile, and the culture reached the stationary phase when the N source was depleted. The rates of hexadecane consumption and aqueous-phase TOC production under aerobic conditions were higher in the exponential growth phase than in the stationary phase. The increase in the TOC level confirmed that hydrocarbon was converted to oxygenated organic compounds by cell metabolism. Rhamnolipids were also produced, and the presence of rhamnolipids was accompanied by reduced medium surface tension (Fig.5).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Results of a typical experiment to examinen-hexadecane metabolism by P. aeruginosa under sequential aerobic and anaerobic denitrifying conditions.

Following the switch to anaerobic denitrifying conditions, nitrate was consumed rapidly initially (during the first day or so). The live cell concentration, however, also decreased. The aqueous-phase TOC level decreased by about 40% during the same active period but was maintained at a high level afterwards. The hexadecane concentration remained constant throughout the anaerobic period, as expected based on the anaerobic recalcitrance of this compound. The rhamnolipid profile fluctuated noticeably at the later stage of the experiment, when an uncharacteristic brown color, in addition to the normal green color, appeared in the anthrone analysis. The brown color might have interfered with the optical measurements and caused the fluctuation. It is not known whether rhamnolipids were significantly degraded. Note that the medium surface tension remained low during this period. The fact that all properties were relatively constant after the initial 2 days of anaerobic denitrification indicated that microbial metabolism was active only during a brief initial period following the switch.

We examined the possible causes of cell death under anaerobic denitrifying conditions. These causes included toxicity of nitrate and nitrite and depletion of readily consumable energy substrates. As shown in Fig. 5, the nitrite concentration increased to about 0.20 g NO2−-N per liter during the rapid initial denitrification stage and remained high (0.20 to 0.25 g NO2−-N per liter) until the end. According to the results described above for the effects of nitrate and nitrite concentrations (Fig. 4), the high nitrite level should definitely have halted cell growth. Nonetheless, we are not certain that it caused cell death.

The possibility that exhaustion of readily consumable TOC caused the sharp decline in cell concentration was examined with two additional experiments in which we used media having different initial TOC concentrations (about 8 and 2 g liter−1). The media used were the cell-free aqueous broth media from two P. aeruginosa fermentations collected by centrifugation after different periods of stationary-phase production of oxygenated metabolites (2 weeks for the high-TOC medium and 2 days for the low-TOC medium). For comparison, the TOC concentration before the switch to denitrification in the previous sequential experiment was 2.8 g liter−1 (Fig. 5), which was within the range covered in the two experiments performed later. The cell (protein) concentrations were, however, very different, about 1.2 g of cell proteins per liter at the switch to denitrifying conditions in the sequential experiment but only 0.01 to 0.04 g liter−1 in the two experiments performed later. (The cell protein concentration in the sequential experiment was not measured but was estimated from the available N source concentration based on our experience with similar systems.) While the high cell concentration led to cell death in the former experiment (Fig. 5), the low inoculum levels in the latter experiments allowed the cells to grow as described in more detail below.

The experiments performed with the media containing high and low TOC concentrations were carried out by using various initial nitrate concentrations (0.35 to 3.30 g of NO3−-N per liter) so that the effects of TOC concentrations on nitrite accumulation could also be investigated. The cell protein, TOC, and nitrite concentration profiles obtained in the high- and low-TOC experiments are shown in Fig. 6 and7, respectively. Not shown but also measured were the changes in pH and the ammonium and nitrate concentrations in the experiments. The pH increased gradually to 6.2 to 7.2, as expected if denitrification occurred. The excess ammonium added initially (0.1 g of NH4+-N per liter) was consumed during cell growth, but the ammonium was never depleted (the remaining NH4+-N concentration in all systems was more than 0.06 g liter−1). Nitrate was consumed during denitrification but also was never depleted because of the low cell concentrations used in the experiments. The cell protein concentrations were up to 0.25 g liter−1 in the high-TOC systems and 0.1 g liter−1 in the low-TOC systems (Fig. 6 and 7). Thus, pH and ammonium and nitrate concentrations did not limit cell growth.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Cell growth, TOC consumption, and transient nitrite accumulation profiles obtained in experiments performed with the high-TOC medium containing different initial nitrate concentrations. Symbols: ●, 2.7 g of NO3−-N per liter; ▴, 0.8 g of NO3−-N per liter; ■, 0.4 g of NO3−-N per liter.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Cell growth, TOC consumption, and transient nitrite accumulation profiles obtained in experiments performed with the low-TOC medium containing different initial nitrate concentrations. Symbols: ●, 3.3 g of NO3−-N per liter; ■, 1.3 g of NO3−-N per liter; ▴, 0.7 g of NO3−-N per liter; ◊, 0.35 g of NO3−-N per liter.

Nitrite accumulation appeared to be affected by the available energy substrate and the cell concentration. In the case of a high TOC concentration (8 g liter−1) and a low initial cell concentration (0.01 to 0.04 g of cell proteins per liter), the nitrite concentration increased initially to 20 to 25 mg of NO2−-N per liter but decreased to almost zero within 20 h (Fig. 6). Slow denitrification by the low concentration of cells did not result in a high level of nitrite during the initial period before nitrite reductases were fully expressed. In addition, the availability of readily consumable TOC allowed the cells to recover from the unbalanced nitrate and nitrite reduction conditions. In the case of the lower TOC concentration (2.8 g liter−1) and much higher cell concentration (about 1.2 g of cell proteins per liter), the nitrite concentration increased rapidly to 150 to 200 mg of NO2−-N per liter and remained high throughout the experiment (Fig. 5). The readily consumable TOC was probably depleted by the high cell concentration before nitrite reductases could be completely synthesized. When the lowest TOC concentration (2 g liter−1) and the lowest initial cell concentration (0.01 g of cell proteins per liter) were used, the lowest initial nitrite concentrations were observed (range, 2 to 10 mg of NO2−-N per liter) (Fig. 7). The nitrite concentrations declined during fermentation but at much slower rates than the rates shown in Fig. 6, presumably because of the lower concentrations of consumable TOC that remained after the development of nitrite reductases. Note that during nitrite (and nitrate) reduction cells accept the electrons donated from substrate oxidation. On the other hand, the effects of different nitrate concentrations on nitrite accumulation were not clearly significant. The high nitrate concentration (3.3 g of NO3−-N per liter) appeared to result in more nitrite accumulation in the low-TOC experiment (Fig. 7) but not in the high-TOC experiment (Fig. 6).

The TOC concentration always decreased rapidly during a short initial period and then remained relatively constant afterwards, as shown in Fig. 5 through 7. The decrease was about one-half the initial TOC concentration, regardless of the different initial TOC and cell concentrations employed. The profiles corresponded very well with the cell growth profiles in the two experiments whose results are shown in Fig. 6 and 7. As no other growth-limiting factors could be identified, the results strongly suggest that only about one-half of the TOC (oxygenated metabolites of hexadecane) could be readily consumed byP. aeruginosa under anaerobic denitrifying conditions. The depletion of the readily consumable portions resulted in a cessation of cell growth in the two experiments with low inoculum levels (Fig. 6 and7) and, plausibly, to cell death in the previous sequential experiment. It is possible that substantially higher fractions of oxygenated metabolites can be consumed if microbial consortia under mixed aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic denitrifying conditions are used instead of a single species under strictly anaerobic denitrifying conditions, as in this study. This must be verified by future study.

In conclusion, the O2-requiring reactions of hydrocarbon metabolism were rate limiting under microaerobic conditions. P. aeruginosa was more sensitive to nitrate-nitrite inhibition under anaerobic denitrifying conditions than under aerobic conditions. For the sequential bioremediation strategy, an initial period should be included for induction of nitrate-nitrite reductases in the presence of low nitrate concentrations in order to minimize the transient accumulation of toxic nitrite. Furthermore, in the single-species systems that have been studied, only about one-half of the TOC derived from hexadecane metabolism by aerobic resting or stationary-phase cells are readily consumed under anaerobic denitrifying conditions. In future work, microbial consortia should be employed to mineralize higher fractions of oxygenated metabolites. Our results improved the knowledge of sequential biodegradation of hydrocarbons and laid an important foundation for further development of advanced bioremediation strategies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Ohio Board of Regents (Ohio Bioprocessing Research Consortium), by grant BES-9900694 from the National Science Foundation, and by a University of Akron faculty research grant.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 August 1999.
    • Accepted 3 November 1999.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Altenschmidt U.,
    2. Fuchs G.
    Anaerobic degradation of toluene in denitrifying Pseudomonas sp.: indication for toluene methylhydroxylation and benzoyl-CoA as central aromatic intermediate. Arch. Microbiol. 156 1991 152 158
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bai G.,
    2. Brusseau M. L.,
    3. Miller R. M.
    Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of residual hydrocarbon from soil. J. Contam. Hydrol. 25 1997 157 170
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bakker G.
    Anaerobic degration of aromatic compounds in the presence of nitrate. FEMS Lett. 1 1977 103 107
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ball H. A.,
    2. Reinhard M.
    Monoaromatic hydrocarbon transformation under anaerobic conditions at Seal Beach, California: laboratory studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 1996 114 122
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Barker J. F.,
    2. Patrick G. C.,
    3. Major D. W.
    Natural attenuation of aromatic hydrocarbons in a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 7 1987 64 71
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bengtsson G.,
    2. Annadotter H.
    Nitrate reduction in a groundwater microcosm determined by 15N gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55 1989 2861 2870
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Blaszczyk M.
    Comparison of denitrification by Paracoccus denitrificans,Pseudomonas stutzeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acta Microbiol. Pol. 4 1992 203 210
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Boulding J. R.
    EPA environmental engineering sourcebook. 1996 Ann Arbor Press Chelsea, Mich
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bouwer E. J.,
    2. McCarty P. L.
    Transformations of halogenated organic compounds under denitrification conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45 1983 1295 1299
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bregnard T. P. A.,
    2. Hoehener P.,
    3. Haener A.,
    4. Zeyer J.
    Degradation of weathered diesel fuel by microorganisms from a contaminated aquifer in aerobic and anaerobic microcosms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15 1996 299 307
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chapelle F. H.
    Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry. 1992 John Wiley & Sons New York, N.Y
  12. 12.↵
    1. Clesceri L. S.,
    2. Greenberg A. E.,
    3. Trussel R. R.
    Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 17th ed. 1989 American Public Health Association Washington, D.C.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Coates J. D.,
    2. Woodward J.,
    3. Allen J.,
    4. Philip P.,
    5. Lovley D. R.
    Anaerobic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and alkanes in petroleum-contaminated marine harbor sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 3589 3593
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cooper D. G.,
    2. Paddock D. A.
    Production of a biosurfactant from Torulopsis bombicola. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47 1984 173 176
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Coschigano P. W.,
    2. Young L. Y.
    Identification and sequence analysis of two regulatory genes involved in anaerobic toluene metabolism by strain T1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 652 660
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dangel W.,
    2. Tschech A.,
    3. Fuchs G.
    Anaerobic metabolism of cyclohexanol by denitrifying bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 150 1988 358 362
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fenchel T.,
    2. Finlay B. J.
    Ecology and evolution in anoxic worlds. 1995 Oxford University Press Oxford, United Kingdom
  18. 18.↵
    1. Gamble T. N.,
    2. Betlach M. R.,
    3. Tiedje J. M.
    Numerically dominant denitrifying bacteria from world soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33 1977 926 939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gerhardt P.,
    2. Murray R. G. E.,
    3. Costilow R. N.,
    4. Nester E. W.,
    5. Wood W. A.,
    6. Krieg N. R.,
    7. Phillips G. B.
    Manual of methods for general bacteriology. 1981 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gersberg R. M.,
    2. Dawsey W. J.,
    3. Ridgway H. F.
    Biodegradation of dissolved aromatic hydrocarbons in gasoline-contaminated groundwater using denitrification Petroleum contaminated soils Calabrese E. J., Kostecki P. T. 2 1989 211 217 Lewis Publishers Chelsea, Mich
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gobbert U.,
    2. Lang S.,
    3. Wagner F.
    Sophorose lipid formation by resting cells of Torulopsis bombicola. Biotechnol. Lett. 6 1984 225 230
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Grbic-Galic D.
    Microbial degradation of homocyclic and heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under anaerobic conditions. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 30 1989 237 253
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hernandez D.,
    2. Dias F. M.,
    3. Rowe J. J.
    Nitrate transport and its regulation by O2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 286 1991 159 163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hess A.,
    2. Zarda B.,
    3. Hahn D.,
    4. Haner A.,
    5. Stax D.,
    6. Hohener P.,
    7. Zeyer J.
    In situ analysis of denitrifying toluene- and m-xylene-degrading bacteria in a diesel fuel-contaminated laboratory aquifer column. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 2136 2141
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ju L.-K.,
    2. Trivedi H. K.
    Monitoring of denitrification by Pseudomonas aeruginosa using on-line fluorescence technique. Biotechnol. Tech. 6 1992 549 554
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. King R. B.,
    2. Long G. M.,
    3. Sheldon J. K.
    Practical environmental bioremediation. 1992 Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Fla
  27. 27.↵
    1. Knowles R.
    Denitrification. Microbiol. Rev. 46 1982 43 70
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kosaric N.
    Biosurfactants: production, properties, and applications. 1993 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
  29. 29.↵
    1. Madigan M. T.,
    2. Martinko J. M.,
    3. Parker J.
    Brock biology of microorganisms 8th ed. 1997 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, N.J
  30. 30.↵
    1. Major D. W.,
    2. Mayfield C. I.,
    3. Baker J. F.
    Biotransformation of benzene by denitrification in aquifer sand. Ground Water 26 1988 8 14
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. McCarty M.
    The health effects of nitrate, nitrite, and N-nitroso compounds. 1981 National Academy Press Washington, D.C.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Patureau D.,
    2. Bernet N.,
    3. Moletta R.
    Effect of oxygen on denitrification in continuous chemostat culture with Comamonas sp. SGLY2. J. Ind. Microbiol. 16 1996 124 128
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Ramirez N.
    Elucidation of sorption, desorption and biodegradation phenomena of pyrene spiked soils. M.S. thesis. 1999 The University of Akron Akron, Ohio
  34. 34.↵
    1. Ridgway H. F.,
    2. Safarik J.,
    3. Phipps D.,
    4. Carl P.,
    5. Clark D.
    Identification and catabolic activity of well-derived gasoline-degrading bacteria from a contaminated aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 1990 3565 3575
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rowe J. J.,
    2. Yarbrough J. M.,
    3. Rake J. B.,
    4. Eagon R. G.
    Nitrite inhibition of aerobic bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 2 1979 51 54
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Rueter P.,
    2. Rabus R.,
    3. Wilkes H.,
    4. Aeckersberg F.,
    5. Rainey F. A.,
    6. Jannasch H. W.,
    7. Widdel F.
    Anaerobic oxidation of hydrocarbons in crude oil by new types of surphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 372 1994 455 458
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Scheibenbogen K.,
    2. Zytner R. G.,
    3. Lee H.,
    4. Trevors J. T.
    Enhanced removal of selected hydrocarbons from soil by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 biosurfactants and some chemical surfactants. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 59 1994 53 59
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Stouthamer A. H.,
    2. de Boer A. P. N.,
    3. van der Oost J.,
    4. van Spanning R. J. M.
    Emerging principles of inorganic nitrogen metabolism in Paracoccus denitrificans and related bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 71 1997 33 41
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Syldatk C.,
    2. Wagner F.
    Production of biosurfactants Biosurfactants and biotechnology. Kosaric N., Cairns W. L., Gray N. C. C. 1987 89 120 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
  40. 40.↵
    1. Thomas J. M.,
    2. Ward C. H.
    In situ biorestoration of organic contaminants in the subsurface. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 1989 760 766
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tiedje J. M.
    Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. 1988 179 243 John Wiley & Sons New York, N.Y
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wilson J. T.,
    2. Leach L. E.,
    3. Henson M.,
    4. Jones J. N.
    In-situ biorestoration as a groundwater remediation technique. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 6 1986 56 64
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Wilson L. P.,
    2. Bouwer E. J.
    Biodegradation of aromatic compounds under mixed oxygen/denitrifying conditions: a review. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18 1997 116 130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Wu J.,
    2. Ju L.-K.
    Extracellular particles of polymeric material formed in n-hexadecane fermentation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 179 1997 193 202
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Degradation of n-Hexadecane and Its Metabolites by Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Microaerobic and Anaerobic Denitrifying Conditions
Chawala Chayabutra, Lu-Kwang Ju
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2000, 66 (2) 493-498; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.493-498.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Degradation of n-Hexadecane and Its Metabolites by Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Microaerobic and Anaerobic Denitrifying Conditions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Degradation of n-Hexadecane and Its Metabolites by Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Microaerobic and Anaerobic Denitrifying Conditions
Chawala Chayabutra, Lu-Kwang Ju
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2000, 66 (2) 493-498; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.493-498.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

alkanes
Oxygen
Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336