Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Geomicrobiology

Life at the Energetic Edge: Kinetics of Circumneutral Iron Oxidation by Lithotrophic Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from the Wetland-Plant Rhizosphere

Scott C. Neubauer, David Emerson, J. Patrick Megonigal
Scott C. Neubauer
1Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: neubauer@serc.si.edu
David Emerson
2American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Patrick Megonigal
1Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3988-3995.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Sample raw data collected during the continuous-feeding experiments for paired bioreactors inoculated with cells or abiotic oxides. Data are from the run started on 9 May 2001. (A) Dissolved oxygen concentrations. (B) Rate of continuous Fe(II) addition. When Fe(II) pulses were added by syringe, the continuous-feed Fe(II) pumps were turned off. (C) Dissolved Fe(II) concentrations. Note that higher rates of Fe(II) addition to the live-cell bioreactor did not typically result in higher Fe(II) concentrations.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Sample growth curves for BrT. The dates are the inoculation dates for the bioreactor runs. (A) Typical growth curves from several bioreactor runs. (B) Effect of Fe(II) supply on cell growth. Cell density did not increase in the absence of an Fe(II) supply.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Sample plots of [Fe(II)] versus time during pulse-feeding experiments. Oxidation rates were calculated by determining the slope of [Fe(II)] versus time when the Fe(II) concentrations were >100 μM.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Variations in modeled Fe(II) oxidation rates with changes in [O2], [Fe]total, and the Fe(II) addition rate. For clarity, standard deviations are shown only for the model output obtained at 0.5% O2 and 1 mM [Fe]total and at 3.0% O2 and 10 mM [Fe]total. (A) Biotic oxidation rates. (B) Secondary effects on abiotic oxidation rates. Negative values imply that the dead cells or cellular by-products inhibited chemical oxidation rates. (C) Net effect of cells on total Fe(II) oxidation rates, expressed as the percentage of change compared with the value for the no-cell treatment. Positive values indicate that the cells increased the total oxidation rate.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Cell growth data for BrT

    Inoculation dateFeeding modeDoubling time (h)Maximum cell density (cells ml−1)
    13 December 2000Pulse33.3 ± 3.82.1 × 106a
    16 January 2001Pulse22.9 ± 5.81.3 × 107
    20 February 2001Pulse23.6 ± 7.99.8 × 106
    28 March 2001Continuous30.5 ± 2.4b1.8 × 107
    9 May 2001Continuous16.7 ± 3.01.4 × 107
    • ↵ a The experiment was stopped before the stationary growth phase was reached.

    • ↵ b Doubling time calculated for the period after the Fe(II) supply was restored.

  • TABLE 2.

    Microbial contribution to total Fe(II) oxidation—direct measurementa

    DateFe(II) oxidation rate (μM h−1)% Biotic
    Before azide additionAfter azide addition
    20 February 2001634332
    13 March 2001b815927
    28 March 200131425618
    9 May 200188541453
    • ↵ a Unless otherwise indicated, all data are for strain BrT. Biotic Fe(II) oxidation was measured directly by determining the difference between successive oxidation rate measurements in the same bioreactor. The first run contained live cells (before azide addition; biotic plus abiotic oxidation) and was followed by a run with killed cells (after azide addition; abiotic oxidation only).

    • ↵ b Data for the marine Fe(II) oxidizer JV-1.

  • TABLE 3.

    Multiple linear regression model parametersa

    Treatmentm1m2m3br2
    Live cells10.47 (4.67)A0.0020 (0.0007)B0.843 (0.020)B−20.46 (12.53)D0.989
    Killed cells15.56 (4.95)A0.0110 (0.0032)A0.577 (0.097)A−49.15 (14.47)A0.919
    No cells15.30 (6.82)B0.0026 (0.0013)C0.700 (0.047)A−11.91 (11.22)D0.916
    • ↵ a The Fe(II) oxidation rate (r) [micromolar Fe(II) oxidized per hour] is calculated as follows: r = m1 × [O2] + m2 × [Fe]total + m3 × [Fe(II) addition rate] + b, where the units for [O2] are the percentage of air saturation, the units for [Fe]total are micromolar, and the units for Fe(II) addition rate are micromolar per hour. The values in parentheses are standard deviations. Also shown is the regression coefficient for each model (r2). The letters after the values indicate the significance of each term to the regression model, as follows: A, P < 0.001; B, P < 0.01; C, P < 0.05; D, not significant.

  • TABLE 4.

    Microbial contribution to total Fe(II) oxidation—statistical modelinga

    [O2] (% of air saturation)[Fe]total (mM)Fe(II) addition rate (μM h−1)Fe(II) oxidation rate (μM h−1)% Biotic
    TotalBiotic
    0.51100714462
    60049317736
    0.510300b257166
    6005119619
    3.01100973132
    60051916532
    3.010300b28431
    6005378316
    • ↵ a Total and biotic Fe(II) oxidation rates were calculated as described in the text.

    • ↵ b At Fe(II) addition rates of <300 μM h−1, the modeled biotic oxidation rates with an [Fe]total of 10 mM were negative; under these conditions, the biotic contribution to total Fe(II) oxidation could not be calculated.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Life at the Energetic Edge: Kinetics of Circumneutral Iron Oxidation by Lithotrophic Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from the Wetland-Plant Rhizosphere
Scott C. Neubauer, David Emerson, J. Patrick Megonigal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2002, 68 (8) 3988-3995; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3988-3995.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Life at the Energetic Edge: Kinetics of Circumneutral Iron Oxidation by Lithotrophic Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from the Wetland-Plant Rhizosphere
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Life at the Energetic Edge: Kinetics of Circumneutral Iron Oxidation by Lithotrophic Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from the Wetland-Plant Rhizosphere
Scott C. Neubauer, David Emerson, J. Patrick Megonigal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2002, 68 (8) 3988-3995; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3988-3995.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteria
iron
Plant Roots
seawater

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336