Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Ecology

Isolation and Characterization of a Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithotroph Growing on Crude Oil under Anaerobic Conditions

Yumiko Kodama, Kazuya Watanabe
Yumiko Kodama
Marine Biotechnology Institute, Kamaishi Laboratories, Heita, Kamaishi City, Iwate 026-0001, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuya Watanabe
Marine Biotechnology Institute, Kamaishi Laboratories, Heita, Kamaishi City, Iwate 026-0001, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kazuya.watanabe@mbio.jp
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.107-112.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Molecular approaches have shown that a group of bacteria (called cluster 1 bacteria) affiliated with the ε subclass of the class Proteobacteria constituted major populations in underground crude-oil storage cavities. In order to unveil their physiology and ecological niche, this study isolated bacterial strains (exemplified by strain YK-1) affiliated with the cluster 1 bacteria from an oil storage cavity at Kuji in Iwate, Japan. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that its closest relative was Thiomicrospira denitrificans (90% identity). Growth experiments under anaerobic conditions showed that strain YK-1 was a sulfur-oxidizing obligate chemolithotroph utilizing sulfide, elemental sulfur, thiosulfate, and hydrogen as electron donors and nitrate as an electron acceptor. Oxygen also supported its growth only under microaerobic conditions. Strain YK-1 could not grow on nitrite, and nitrite was the final product of nitrate reduction. Neither sugars, organic acids (including acetate), nor hydrocarbons could serve as carbon and energy sources. A typical stoichiometry of its energy metabolism followed an equation: S2− + 4NO3− → SO42− + 4NO2− (ΔG0 = −534 kJ mol−1). In a difference from other anaerobic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, this bacterium was sensitive to NaCl; growth in medium containing more than 1% NaCl was negligible. When YK-1 was grown anaerobically in a sulfur-depleted inorganic medium overlaid with crude oil, sulfate was produced, corresponding to its growth. On the contrary, YK-1 could not utilize crude oil as a carbon source. These results suggest that the cluster 1 bacteria yielded energy for growth in oil storage cavities by oxidizing petroleum sulfur compounds. Based on its physiology, ecological interactions with other members of the groundwater community are discussed.

Underground cavities have been used for long-term storage of crude oil in several countries, including those situated at Kuji in Iwate, Japan. Since these cavities have been constructed in groundwater-rich rocky strata, groundwater migrates into and accumulates at the bottom of these cavities (this groundwater is called cavity groundwater [26]). This flow of groundwater facilitates establishing a continuous culture of microorganisms in cavity groundwater; the cell count was constantly over 106 ml−1, which was 100 times greater than the counts in control groundwater obtained around these cavities (26). This habitat of microorganisms can be characterized by immediate contact with a large quantity of crude oil and by an excess of electron donors (i.e., hydrocarbons) but a shortage of electron acceptors. These characteristics may be similar to those of microbial habitats associated with subterranean oil reservoirs that have recently attracted strong microbiological attention (6, 8, 11, 24). Since cavity groundwater can easily be obtained at any time without contamination by surface water (26, 27), these cavities are considered to represent good models for studying the microbial ecology of subterranean oil fields.

Our previous study applied molecular phylogenetic approaches to analyzing bacterial populations that occurred in the Kuji cavity groundwater (26). It was found that a group of bacteria (called cluster 1 bacteria) affiliated with the Thiovulum subgroup (10) in the ε subclass of the class Proteobacteria constituted major populations, sharing 10 to 30% of the total microbial populations. We have also detected cluster 1 bacteria in oil storage cavities at Kushikino in Kagoshima, Japan (unpublished data). The Thiovulum subgroup includes three cultivated sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) (3, 7, 19) and many environmental clones obtained from hydrothermal vents (5, 12), marine sediments (2), and groundwater (15-17). In this subgroup, the cluster 1 bacteria formed a peculiar assemblage, called the groundwater bacteria assemblage, together with three environmental clones obtained from groundwater at geographically distant sites (15-17, 26). It has thus been suggested that bacteria belonging to this assemblage are widely distributed in the subterranean environment, although their physiology and ecological niche have been unknown.

The present study isolated bacterial strains (exemplified by strain YK-1) affiliated with the cluster 1 bacteria from an oil storage cavity at Kuji. In order to unveil their ecological niche in oil storage cavities, experiments were conducted to investigate physiological features of strain YK-1. In these experiments, especially provocative was the possibility that YK-1 could utilize crude oil for its growth under anaerobic conditions. Based on its physiological features, we discussed ecological interactions of the cluster 1 bacteria with other members of the cavity groundwater community.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Groundwater sample.The cavity groundwater used for isolation of bacteria was obtained in March 1999 from the TK101 underground crude oil storage cavity situated at Kuji in Iwate, Japan. Characteristics of this groundwater have been reported previously (26).

Culture media, growth conditions, and maintenance.Culture media used in this study included DSM113 (for nitrate-reducing thiosulfate-oxidizing bacteria) (the DSM catalog provided by German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures [http://www.dsmz.de/ ]), Luria-Bertani (for heterotrophs [20]), dCGY (for heterotrophs [25]) and MP (an inorganic medium [25]). The MBM medium was also used in this study, which contained (liter−1) 0.2 g of KH2PO4, 0.2 g of NH4Cl, 0.4 g of MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.2 g of KCl, 0.1 g of CaCl2 · 2H2O, 0.2 g of NaNO3, 2 mg of resazurin, and 2 ml of SL-4 trace metal solution (the DSM catalog). Solid media contained 1.5% Bactoagar (Difco). These media were sterilized by autoclaving and cooled under an N2 atmosphere. For anaerobic cultivation, freshly prepared Na2S · 9H2O (2 mM) was used as a reducing agent unless otherwise specified. The pH was adjusted to 7.0. Routine cultivation was conducted at 25°C using a bottle capped with a Teflon-coated butyl rubber septum and sealed with an aluminum crimp seal. The vapor phase in the bottle was filled with N2-CO2 (80%:20%) or N2-CO2-H2 (80%:10%:10%), and when necessary, pure N2 was used. Cells in liquid culture were counted by using epifluorescence microscopy after they were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and collected on a black Isopore membrane (pore size, 0.22 μM; Millipore). Concentrations of ions in culture were measured by ion chromatography using an IA-100 ion analyzer (DKK Toa) or an ICA-2000 ion analyzer equipped with an electrolytic conductivity detector and a spectrophotometer (DKK Toa). For storage, cells were frozen at −80°C in the presence of 15% (wt vol−1) glycerol.

Isolation.The groundwater sample and its dilutions were streaked on agar plates containing one of the following four media: medium DSM113, Luria-Bertani medium, medium dCGY, or medium MP containing Arabian light crude oil (0.1% wt vol−1). These plates were incubated at 20°C in the dark under aerobic, microaerobic (1% O2 [vol vol−1]), or anaerobic conditions. Campy pouches (BBL) were used for the microaerobic incubation, while GasPak pouches (BBL) or AnaeroPack pouches (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical) were used for anaerobic incubation.

Colonies formed on plates were picked and further purified by restreaking on agar plates. A small amount of cells was then picked using a needle and suspended in a PCR solution in which the variable V3 region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene (16S ribosomal DNA [rDNA]) tagged with the GC clamp was amplified. Primers used were P2 and P3 (13), and PCR conditions used were described elsewhere (25). The PCR product was analyzed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as described previously (26). The 16S rDNA fragments PCR amplified from cavity-groundwater DNA were always applied to a DGGE gel for comparison with bands from colonies. The purity of the culture was also checked by the DGGE analysis.

Phylogenetic analysis.A small amount of cells was picked from a colony developed on an MBM medium plate and suspended in a PCR solution. A full-length fragment of the 16S rDNA was amplified by PCR using bacterial universal primers (26) and sequenced as described previously (26). The profile alignment technique of ClustalW version 1.7 (23) was used to align the sequences, and the alignments were refined by visual inspection; secondary structures were considered for the refinement (4). A phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the njplot program in ClustalW, version 1.7. Nucleotide positions at which any sequence had a gap or ambiguous base were not included in the phylogenetic calculations.

Electron microscopy.Cells were grown in the DSM113 medium, collected by centrifugation at approximately 10,000 × g, and suspended in a small amount of sterile H2O. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde (2.5% wt vol−1) and osmium tetroxide (1% wt vol−1), dried with a graded series of ethanol, and sputter coated with a Pt-Pd film (1). Cells were finally visualized using an S-2500 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi). For transmission scanning electron microscopy, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide, embedded in agar and Spurr resin, and negatively stained with uranyl acetate plus lead citrate (1). Cells thus treated were visualized using an H-7000 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi).

Taxonomic and physiological tests.Cells grown on sulfide (added as the reducing agent) and nitrate in MBM medium were used unless otherwise specified. All following tests were run at least in duplicate. Gram staining and oxidase and catalase tests were conducted according to standard procedures (21). Motility was checked by phase-contrast microscopy (21).

Effects of temperature, pH, and salinity (NaCl concentration) on bacterial growth were examined in MBM medium. Buffer systems used for changing pH of the media were described elsewhere (3). The headspace of a test bottle was filled with N2-CO2-H2 (80%:10%:10%).

Carbon source tests were also conducted in MBM containing sulfide as an electron donor and nitrate as an electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions. Test compounds (2 mM) included bicarbonate, acetate, glucose, octane, toluene and benzene. The headspace of a bottle was filled with pure N2 gas (more than 99.999%) deoxygenated using a Hungate apparatus.

To examine fermentative growth, nitrate-depleted MBM medium supplemented with either of the following substrates (2 mM) was used: acetate, pyruvate, succinate, fumarate, malate, aspartate, lactate, or glucose. Ascorbate (2 mM) was added as a reducing agent; YK-1 could not grow on ascorbate. The headspace of a bottle was filled with N2-CO2 (80%:20%).

Aerobic growth was examined in nitrate-depleted MBM medium supplemented with either of the following electron donors (2 mM): sulfide, thiosulfate, acetate, pyruvate, succinate, fumarate, lactate, glucose, formate, malate, glutamate, benzoate, phenol, octane, toluene, benzene, or elemental sulfur (1% wt vol−1). Elemental sulfur was sterilized as described elsewhere (29).

Microaerobic growth was tested in MBM medium without nitrate at an O2 partial pressure in the headspace of 1% (vol vol−1). The headspace gas also contained CO2 (20%) and N2 (the rest). Electron donors tested included sulfide (2 mM), thiosulfate (2 mM), H2 (10% of N2 in the headspace was replaced), and elemental sulfur (1% wt vol−1). Titanium(III) citrate (1.3 mM) was used as a reducing agent (9), when the medium did not contain sulfide.

Anaerobic growth was examined in modified MBM medium containing either sulfide (2 mM), thiosulfate (2 mM), H2 (10% in headspace), or elemental sulfur (1%) as an electron donor and either nitrate (0.6 mM) or nitrite (0.7 mM) as an electron acceptor. Titanium (III) citrate (1.3 mM) was used as a reducing agent. The headspace gas consisted of N2-CO2 (80%:20%). In a growth test with H2 as an electron donor, the headspace gas consisted of N2-CO2-H2 (80%:10%:10%). In a growth test with an organic compound (methanol, formate, acetate, pyruvate, succinate, fumarate, lactate, glucose, malate, glutamate, phenol, benzoate or octane [2 mM]) as an electron donor, MBM medium was used in which nitrate served as an electron acceptor.

The standard free energy generated by a metabolic reaction was calculated from the standard free energies of reactants and products (22). The amount of sulfur oxidized was estimated from the amount of sulfate produced, since possible intermediate metabolites (elemental sulfur, thiosulfate, and sulfite) were not detected or detected transiently in the culture.

Growth on crude oil.Crude oil used was Arabian light. The crude oil was sterilized and deaerated by the method of Rabus and Widdel (18). Eight milliliters of MBM medium supplemented with ascorbate (2 mM) was infused into a bottle (20 ml in capacity), overlaid with 2 ml of the crude oil, and sealed with a Teflon-coated butyl rubber septum and an aluminum crimp cap under the nitrogen atmosphere. In some cases, sulfide (2 mM) and bicarbonate (2 mM) were added as an electron donor and a carbon source, respectively. The headspace was filled with pure N2. The bottle was inoculated with approximately 0.1 ml of YK-1 culture fully grown in the MBM medium by using a syringe needle. The culture was incubated at 20°C without shaking.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains YK-1, YK-2, YK-3, and YK-4 have been deposited in the GSDB, DDBJ, EMBL, and NCBI nucleotide sequence databases under accession no. AB053951 , AB080643 , AB080644 , and AB080645 .

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation.Colonies formed on agar plates of several different types of media (see Materials and Methods) under aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic conditions were subjected to the genetic screening by means of DGGE of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA fragments. A DGGE band derived from a colony was compared to a band representing cluster 1 bacteria in the DGGE profile for the Kuji cavity groundwater (see reference 26). Bands obtained from several very tiny colonies formed on the DSM113 plates migrated to the same position as the band of the cluster 1 bacteria; these colonies were picked and purified by restreaking them on the DSM113 plates. The bacterial strains thus obtained were designated YK-1, YK-2, YK-3, and YK-4. Their 16S rDNA sequences were similar and were affiliated with the cluster 1 bacteria (Fig. 1). In addition, preliminary tests showed that their physiological characteristics were identical (data not shown). We therefore describe in the following section characteristics of strain YK-1 as the representative. Strain YK-1 was deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms under strain number JCM 11577.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic positions of strains YK-1, YK-2, YK-3, and YK-4 in the ε subclass of the class Proteobacteria. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans was used as the out-group. Accession numbers of the sequences retrieved from the databases are given in parentheses. The numbers at the branch nodes are bootstrap values (per 100 trials); only values greater than 50 are shown. The scale bar indicates 0.026 substitutions per site.

The database search with the 16S rDNA sequences showed Thiomicrospira denitrificans to be the closest relative of strain YK-1, as previously reported for the cluster 1 bacteria (26), although the identity was approximately 90%. Recently, another Thiomicrospira bacterium, strain CVO, was isolated from the production water of a Canadian oil well (3). The identity between the 16S rDNA sequence of strain YK-1 and that of strain CVO was also 90%.

DSM113 medium has been used to cultivate T. denitrificans (7). Thiosulfate was supplemented as an electron donor in this medium, while sulfide added as a reducing agent could also serve as an electron donor. Growth of strain YK-1 in the liquid DSM113 medium was very slow, however, with the doubling time being approximately 15 days. We assumed that this slow growth was attributable to a high ionic strength of medium DSM113, because this medium had been designed for T. denitrificans, a marine bacterium. Actually, the ionic strength of the cavity groundwater was very low (its electric conductivity was 250 to 300 μS). When YK-1 was grown in the MBM medium (a low-ionic-strength medium developed in this study) supplemented with bicarbonate (2 mM) under N2 atmosphere, the doubling time of YK-1 was shortened to approximately 1 day (Fig. 2). MBM-based media were hence used in the subsequent experiments.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Changes in ion concentrations (nitrate, ○; nitrite,⋄; sulfate, ▵) during chemolithotrophic growth of YK-1 (□) in MBM medium supplemented with bicarbonate (2 mM) at 25°C under the N2 atmosphere, where sulfide (0.5 mM) was an electron donor and nitrate (1 mM) was an electron acceptor. Datum points and bars are means and standard deviations, respectively (n = 3).

Physiological and taxonomic characteristics of strain YK-1.Electron microscopy showed that the strain YK-1 cell was a curved rod with a length of 1 to 2 μm and a diameter of approximately 0.4 μm. The transmission scanning electron microscopy picture showed a single flagellum attaching at one pole.

Physiological and taxonomic characteristics of strain YK-1 are summarized in Table 1, in which characteristics of T. denitrificans (7) and strain CVO (3) cited from the literature are also presented for the comparison. The data in this table illustrate that YK-1 is a sulfur-oxidizing obligate chemolithotroph growing under microaerobic and anaerobic conditions. We found several distinct features of YK-1, which could clearly separate YK-1 from strains of Thiomicrospira; these features include motility, NaCl sensitivity, inability to utilize acetate as a carbon source, ability to utilize hydrogen gas as an electron donor, the product of nitrate reduction, the end product from sulfide oxidation, and inability to utilize nitrite as an electron acceptor. Another isolated member of the Thiovulum subgroup, Thiovulum sp., is also a SOB; however, its features described in the literature (19) are quite different from those of strain YK-1. Thiovulum grows only under microaerobic conditions by reducing molecular oxygen, and cells are round or ovoid (5 to 25 μm in diameter). The higher sensitivity to NaCl of YK-1 than of the other anaerobic SOB is understandable, because YK-1 is the only strain isolated from fresh groundwater. From these results, YK-1 is considered to represent a novel genus in the ε subclass of the class Proteobacteria, although further studies are needed to confirm this idea.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Summary of characteristics of strain YK-1

A typical growth pattern of strain YK-1 in MBM medium at 25°C under the N2 atmosphere is shown in Fig. 2, where sulfide was an electron donor and nitrate was an electron acceptor. This organism did not show a typical exponential growth pattern, probably due to its two-step oxidation of sulfide; i.e., it initially transformed sulfide to elemental sulfur and subsequently started to produce sulfate. A stoichiometric analysis of the ions consumed and produced during this growth suggests that the energy metabolism of YK-1 follows an equation: S2− + 4NO3− → SO42− + 4NO2− (ΔG0 = −534 kJ mol−1). As shown in Fig. 2, growth of YK-1 terminated below a cell count of 107 ml−1. This low cell count is considered to be ascribable in part to the accumulation of nitrite. Its growth on sulfide and nitrate in MBM medium was inhibited, when nitrite was added at concentrations above 0.7 mM (data not shown). Nitrite was always the terminal product of nitrate reduction, even when the HS−/NO3− ratio was changed from to 0.2 to 5.

In addition to sulfide, thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and hydrogen also supported growth of YK-1 as electron donors. The strain was also capable of utilizing molecular oxygen as an electron acceptor under microaerobic conditions. The wide variety of energy metabolism could allow this type of organisms (e.g., those affiliated with the groundwater bacteria assemblage [26]) to occur widely in subterranean environments where the organic nutrient is limited.

Ecological niche.We next investigated growth of YK-1 in the presence of crude oil (Fig. 3). Two major effects of crude oil on microbial growth are conceivable; first, crude oil may serve as a nutrient (i.e., carbon and energy sources), and second, crude oil may select for microorganisms that exhibit resistance to organic solvents. This experiment therefore overlaid a culture medium with an excess amount of crude oil, which may have simulated the habitat in the oil storage cavity. Figure 3 shows that YK-1 did not grow without bicarbonate even when crude oil was present, indicating that YK-1 was incapable of utilizing crude oil as a carbon source. In addition, it could not grow in bicarbonate-depleted media supplemented with pure hydrocarbons including octane, benzene, and toluene (Table 1). In contrast, when a sulfur-free inorganic medium was overlaid with crude oil, growth of YK-1 was observed, corresponding to the production of sulfate (Fig. 3). These data indicate that YK-1 grew by oxidizing sulfur compounds in crude oil as energy sources. They also indicate that YK-1 exhibited resistance to an excess amount of crude oil. It is noteworthy that this organism utilizes crude oil as an energy source (electron donor) but not as a carbon source. Crude oil contains a variety of sulfur compounds, including inorganic and organic ones, and most of the sulfur has been considered to be bound to organic compounds (14); this is especially relevant to crude oil that has been stored for a long time after it was produced. We therefore assume that YK-1 may have utilized some organosulfur compounds to produce sulfate. We are currently carrying out further experiments to identify types of sulfur compounds, including various organosulfur compounds, which are available for strain YK-1.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Growth of strain YK-1 in the presence of an excess amount of crude oil. Media used were modified forms of MBM, and growth conditions are shown in the table below the panels. (A) Growth curve. (B) Changes in sulfate concentration. Panel B also presents sulfate concentrations under culture condition 1 without inoculation with YK-1 (⋄). Datum points and bars are means and standard deviations, respectively (n = 3).

Recently we reevaluated the bacterial biodiversity in the oil storage cavity at Kuji by cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments that were amplified by PCR using universal primers (28). In order to examine if major rRNA sequence types thus obtained actually represented abundant populations in the groundwater, we applied quantitative competitive PCR with specific primers (28). In these experiments, bacterial populations detected in abundance were related to sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) (affiliated with Desulfovibrio and Desulfotomaculum), denitrifying bacteria (Azoarcus/Zoogloae group), acetogens (Acetobacterium), and the cluster 1 bacteria. Together with the results obtained in the present study, it can be assumed that the cluster 1 bacteria may compete for nitrate with the Azoarcus/Zoogloae population (31). At the same time, the Azoarcus/Zoogloae population may scavenge nitrite produced by the cluster 1 bacteria (31), which may be advantageous to the cluster 1 bacteria. Currently, we are trying to isolate bacteria which represent the Azoarcus/Zoogloae-group bacteria.

We also consider the possibility that sulfate produced from crude oil by the cluster 1 bacteria (YK-1) could promote growth of SRB in the oil storage cavity. This notion is based on our finding that although the molecular analyses detected a significant level of SRB, sulfate concentrations in inflow groundwater and in groundwater that had accumulated at the bottom of the cavities were at the same level (4 to 8 mg liter−1 [26]). The SRB affiliated with the same genera as those detected from the oil storage cavity had also been detected and isolated from subterranean oil fields (11, 24), and some representative organisms of these genera are known to be capable of anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation (30). The cluster 1 bacteria could utilize sulfide produced by such SRB, suggesting the presence of a sulfur cycle in the oil storage cavity. A similar sulfur cycle has previously been suggested for a Canadian oil reservoir (24), and anaerobic SOB, strains CVO and FWKO B, were isolated from it (3). In the case of the Canadian reservoir, however, the injection with sulfate-containing surface water has been considered essential for maintaining the sulfur cycle (24). In contrast, the results of the present study suggest that the sulfur cycle in the oil storage cavity can be supported by petroleum sulfur compounds from which sulfate is produced by anaerobic SOB. According to this idea, we hypothesize that the sulfur cycle involving SOB and SRB operates more ubiquitously in subterranean oil fields than hitherto believed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Koichi Nakagaki and Yoichi Matsumura for kind help in the sampling of groundwater. We also thank Hiroshi Urata for electron microscopy and Sachiko Kawasaki and Ikuko Hiramatsu for technical assistance.

This work was supported in part by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 May 2002.
    • Accepted 30 September 2002.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Beveridge, T. J., T. J. Popkin, and R. M. Cole. 1994. Electron microscopy, p. 42-71. In P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood, and N. R. Krieg (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  2. 2.↵
    Devereux, R., and G. W. Mundfrom. 1994. A phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA sequences from sulfate-reducing bacteria in a sandy marine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.60:3437-3439.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Gevertz, D., A. J. Telang, G. Voordouw, and G. E. Jenneman. 2000. Isolation and characterization of strains CVO and FWKO B, two novel nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria isolated from oil field brine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:2491-2501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Gutell, R. R. 1994. Collection of small subunit (16S and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res.22:3502-3507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Haddad, A., F. Camacho, P. Durand, and S. C. Cary. 1995. Phylogenetic characterization of the epibiotic bacteria associated with the hydrothermal vent polychaete Alvinella pompejana. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61:1679-1687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Krumholz, L. R., J. P. McKinley, G. A. Ulrich, and J. M. Suflita. 1997. Confined subsurface microbial communities in cretaceous rock. Nature386:64-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Kuenen, J. G., L. A. Robertson, and O. H. Tuovinen. 1992. The genus Thiomicrospira, p. 2652-2657. In A. Balow, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
  8. 8.↵
    L'Haridon, S., A. L. Reysenbach, P. Glenat, D. Prieur, and C. Jeanthon. 1995. Hot subterranean biosphere in a continental oil reservoir. Nature37:7223-7224.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Lomans, B. P., R. Maas, R. Luderer, H. J. M. O. den Camp, A. Pol, C. van der Drift, and G. D. Vogels. 1999. Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65:3641-3650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Maidak, B. L., J. R. Cole, C. T. Parker, Jr., G. M. Garrity, N. Larsen, B. Li, T. G. Lilburn, M. J. McCaughey, G. J. Olsen, R. Overbeek, S. Pramanik, T. M. Schmidt, J. M. Tiedje, and C. R. Woese. 1999. A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res.27:171-173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Margot, M., B. Ollivier, and B. K. C. Patel. 2000. Microbiology of petroleum reservoirs. Antonie Leeuwenhoek77:103-116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Moyer, C. L., F. C. Dobbs, and D. K. Karl. 1995. Phylogenetic diversity of the bacterial community from a microbial mat at an active, hydrothermal vent system, Loihi seamount, Hawaii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61:1555-1562.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Muyzer, G., E. C. de Waal, and A. G. Uitterlinden. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.59:695-700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Orr, W. L., and J. S. S. Damste. 1990. Geochemistry of sulfur in petroleum systems, p. 2-29. In W. L. Orr and C. M. White (ed.), Geochemistry of sulfur in fossil fuels. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
  15. 15.↵
    Pedersen, K., J. Arlinger, L. Hallbeck, and C. Pettersson. 1996. Diversity and distribution of subterranean bacteria in groundwater at Oklo in Gabon, Africa, as determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Mol. Ecol.5:427-436.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.
    Pedersen, K., L. Hallbeck, J. Arlinger, A. C. Erlandson, and N. Jahromi. 1997. Investigation of the potential for microbial contamination of deep granitic aquifers during drilling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and culturing methods. J. Microbiol. Methods30:179-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Pedersen, K., J. Arlinger, A. C. Erlandson, and L. Hallbeck. 1997. Culturability and 16S rRNA gene diversity of microorganisms in the hyperalkaline groundwater of Maqarin, Jordan, p. 239-261. In K. Pederson (ed.), SKB technical report 97-22. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm.
  18. 18.↵
    Rabus, R., and F. Widdel. 1996. Utilization of alkylbenzenes during anaerobic growth of pure cultures of denitrifying bacteria on crude oil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:1238-1241.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Riviere, J. W. M., and K. Schmidt. 1992. The genus Thiovulum, p. 3942-3947. In A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
  20. 20.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  21. 21.↵
    Smibert, R. M., and N. R. Krieg. 1994. Phenotypic characterization, p. 607-654. In P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood, and N. R. Krieg (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  22. 22.↵
    Thauer, R. K., K. Jungermann, and K. Decker. 1977. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev.41:100-180.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res.22:4673-4680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Voordouw, G., S. M. Armstrong, M. F. Reimer, B. Fouts, A. J. Telang, Y. Shen, and D. Gevertz. 1996. Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from oil field microbial communities indicates the presence of a variety of sulfate-reducing, fermentative, and sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:1623-1629.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Watanabe, K., M. Teramoto, H. Futamata, and S. Harayama. 1998. Molecular detection, isolation, and physiological characterization of functionally dominant phenol-degrading bacteria in activated sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64:4396-4402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Watanabe, K., K. Watanabe, Y. Kodama, K. Syutsubo, and S. Harayama. 2000. Molecular characterization of bacterial populations in petroleum-contaminated groundwater discharged from underground crude oil storage cavities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:4803-4809.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Watanabe, K., Y. Kodama, and S. Harayama. 2001. Design and evaluation of PCR primers to amplify bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA fragments used for community fingerprinting. J. Microbiol. Methods44:253-262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Watanabe, K., Y. Kodama, and N. Kaku. 2002. Diversity and abundance of bacteria in an underground oil-storage cavity. BMC Microbiol.2:23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Widdel, F., and N. Pfennig. 1991. The genus Desulfuromonas and other Gram-negative sulfur-reducing eubacteria, p. 3379-3389. In A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed., vol. IV. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
  30. 30.↵
    Widdel, F., and R. Rabus. 2001. Anaerobic biodegradation of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.12:259-276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Zumft, W. G. 1991. The denitrifying prokaryotes, p. 554-582. In A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed., vol. IV. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Isolation and Characterization of a Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithotroph Growing on Crude Oil under Anaerobic Conditions
Yumiko Kodama, Kazuya Watanabe
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 107-112; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.107-112.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Isolation and Characterization of a Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithotroph Growing on Crude Oil under Anaerobic Conditions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Isolation and Characterization of a Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithotroph Growing on Crude Oil under Anaerobic Conditions
Yumiko Kodama, Kazuya Watanabe
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 107-112; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.107-112.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Epsilonproteobacteria
Fresh Water
Petroleum
sulfur
Water Pollution

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336