Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants

Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Belgin Dogan
1Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn J. Boor
1Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kjb4@cornell.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Degradation of milk components through various enzymatic activities associated with the contamination of dairy products by Pseudomonas spp. can reduce the shelf life of processed milk. Reliable methods for differentiating among Pseudomonas spp. strains are necessary to identify and eliminate specific sources of bacterial contamination from dairy processing systems. To that end, we assessed the genetic diversity and dairy product spoilage potentials among a total of 338 Pseudomonas spp. isolates from raw and pasteurized milk and from environmental samples collected from four dairy processing plants. The majority of isolates were identified as P. fluorescens and P. putida by API 20 NE. A total of 42 different ribotype patterns were identified among a subset of 81 isolates. The presence of many different ribotypes within this collection indicates high genetic diversity among the isolates and suggests multiple origins of contamination within the processing plant and in dairy products. The extracellular enzyme activity patterns among Pseudomonas isolates appeared to be associated with ribotypes. Isolates with the same ribotype frequently had the same extracellular protease, lecithinase, and lipase activities. For example, isolates grouped in ribotype 55-S-6 had the highest extracellular protease activity, while those in ribotypes 50-S-8 and 72-S-3 had the highest extracellular lipase activities. We conclude that ribotyping provides a reliable method for differentiating Pseudomonas strains with dairy food spoilage potential.

Bacterial spoilage causes significant economic losses for the food industry. Product contamination with psychrotrophic microorganisms is a particular concern for the dairy industry as dairy products are distributed at temperatures permissive for the growth of these organisms. The diverse microbes that may be categorized as psychrotrophic are ubiquitous in nature and can be isolated from soil, water, and vegetation (8). As psychrotrophic bacteria typically enter processed dairy products through postpasteurization contamination in the milk processing plant (21, 23), these microbes may account for only a small fraction of the initial flora of processed milk. Bacterial spoilage ensues when growth conditions during refrigerated storage allow psychrotrophic microbes to increase in number and to become the dominant microflora (9).

Currently, the predominant microorganisms limiting the shelf life of processed fluid milk at 4°C are Pseudomonas spp. (9, 11, 29). In addition to the ability of Pseudomonas spp. to grow to high numbers during refrigerated storage, many of these strains also produce heat-stable extracellular lipases, proteases, and lecithinases which can further contribute to milk spoilage (6, 8, 26, 27). Many of these enzymes remain active, even following thermal processing steps that can destroy the organisms that produce these enzymes (13, 20, 27). Degradation of milk components through various enzymatic activities can reduce the shelf life of processed milk. For example, digestion of casein by proteases can lead to a bitter flavor and the clotting and gelation of milk. Lipases hydrolyze tributyrin and milk fat to yield free fatty acids, which cause milk to taste rancid, bitter, unclean, and soapy. Lecithinase degrades milk fat globule membranes and increases the susceptibility of milk fat to the action of lipases (8, 10, 26). The hydrolytic products of milk fats and proteins decrease the organoleptic quality of fluid milk products.

Not all Pseudomonas spp. strains are equally capable of producing degradative defects in processed fluid milk samples (11, 32). Reliable methods for differentiating Pseudomonas spp. strains with food spoilage potential from strains that are less destructive are necessary to identify and eliminate the environmental contamination sources of the destructive strains. Traditional microbiological techniques for bacterial identification, such as observation of growth patterns on selective and differentiative media, biochemical reactions, and microscopy, often lack discriminatory power and usually are ineffective in establishing a causal relationship between contamination of the finished product and the environmental source. Furthermore, results can be difficult to reproduce. Genotypic methods such as ribotyping offer enhanced discriminatory power (30). Ribotyping has been demonstrated to rapidly and reproducibly type bacterial isolates to the genus, species, and strain levels (4, 5).

Our objectives in this study were as follows: (i) to assess the genetic diversity of Pseudomonas spp. in milk and dairy processing environments and (ii) to determine the association between genetic types (ribotypes) of Pseudomonas spp. and their potentials to cause spoilage (i.e., production of proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes). Our results show high diversity among Pseudomonas spp. in dairy plants. We also found a strong association between Pseudomonas spp. ribotype and spoilage capacity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions. Pseudomonas spp. isolates from raw and pasteurized milk samples were obtained as part of the shelf life testing program of the Cornell University Milk Quality Improvement Program (2). Raw and processed milk samples and environmental samples from the four processing plants involved in this program were collected over a 15-month period. Each processing plant was visited at least three times. Processed milk samples were collected during the first and second visits, raw milk was collected during the second visit, and environmental samples were collected during the third visit.

The numbers of viable bacteria in pasteurized and raw milk samples were determined by standard plate counts (SPC) and psychrotrophic plate counts (PPC) (19). Pasteurized milk samples were plated at days 0, 7, and 14 after receipt. For each sample, 10 to 15 Pseudomonas-like colonies were picked randomly from representative SPC plates and streaked to purification on plate count agar (PCA; Difco, Detroit, Mich.). Environmental samples were collected from the processing environment (floor, drains, pipes, filling bowl interior, pasteurized-milk storage tanks, and valves) by using sterile sponges moistened with neutralizing buffer (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, Calif.). Environmental samples were transported to the laboratory in sterile stomacher bags, stored at 4°C, and analyzed within 24 h. A volume of 25 to 50 ml of phosphate buffer was added to the bags, and 10-fold serial dilutions were plated onto cetrimide-fucidin-cephaloridine (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom)-supplemented Pseudomonas agar base (Oxoid) plates. Ten to fifteen colonies were chosen randomly from each sample. All single colonies were initially characterized according to Gram staining results and oxidase and catalase activities. The colonies that were confirmed as putative Pseudomonas spp. (gram negative, oxidase positive, and catalase positive) were further characterized as described below.

Phenotypic characterization.All isolates were characterized by using API 20 NE strips (BioMerioux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Species identifications were obtained by using the API database. Oxidase reactions of the isolates were determined using BBLDrySlide oxidase slides (Becton Dickinson Company, Sparks, Md.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For catalase activity, 1.5% H2O2 was dropped onto a bacterial smear that had been placed on a glass slide. Gas production indicated a positive reaction.

Extracellular-enzyme production.To determine the production of extracellular proteases, lipases, and lecithinases, Pseudomonas colonies were streaked to isolation on PCA and then single colonies were transferred to agar plates containing the appropriate substrates. Production of extracellular proteolytic enzymes was determined on PCA (Difco) containing 1% skim milk powder (skim milk agar) (31). After incubation at 30°C for 72 h, the plates were flooded with 1 N HCl for observation of clearance zones formed by protease-positive strains. For each isolate, clearance zones around two to five colonies were measured and the ratio of the clearance zone diameter to the colony diameter was calculated. The assay was repeated at least three times, and the mean ratios and standard deviations are reported. Production of extracellular lipase was assessed using single-layer agar (31) consisting of 5% (wt/vol) clarified butterfat (16) and Victoria blue B blended into tryptic soy agar (Difco) (1:7,500 dilution). After being incubated at 30°C for up to 5 days, the plates were observed for the presence of colonies surrounded by dark blue zones. Lipase activity was assessed by noting the color intensity surrounding the colonies. Following visual inspection, the color intensity was categorized on a scale of 1 to 4, where 1 represents light blue and 4 represents very dark blue. Production of extracellular lecithinase was determined on PCA containing 10% egg yolk emulsion (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). After incubation at 30°C for up to 5 days, the diameters of the opaque rings surrounding lecithinase-positive colonies were measured for two to three representative colonies for each isolate. The ratio of the size of the opaque zone to that of the colony was calculated. The mean ratios and standard deviations from three assays are reported.

In addition to the 338 isolates from this study, a total of 27 Pseudomonas isolates were selected from a previous study for the enzyme assays (32).

Ribotyping.Isolates with different API 20 NE codes were selected for ribotyping. Colonies obtained from different samples but with identical API codes were treated as independent isolates.

Bacteria were grown on brain heart infusion agar (Becton Dickinson) overnight at 30°C and ribotyped by using the restriction enzyme EcoRI in a RiboPrinter (Qualicon Inc., Wilmington, Del.) as described previously (5).

Sensory analyses.Sensory analyses of the pasteurized milk samples were performed by 10 trained members of a sensory panel as follows. Milk samples were mixed by inversion, and then, in dim light, 60 ml of each sample was poured into 148-ml plastic cups, which were capped with plastic lids and presented at 15°C to panel members. Panelists evaluated the milk according to the procedures of Chapman et al. (7). Milk flavor was scored on a scale from 1 to 10, where any rating below 6 was considered poor, 6 to 7 was fair, and 8 to 10 was good. The overall scores were assigned with a predominant sensory criticism. Unsalted crackers and spring water were provided to cleanse the palate. Panelists were provided monetary incentives to encourage participation through the completion of the experiments. The Compusense five (Compusense Inc., Guelph, Canada) computerized data collection system was used to determine the order of presentation of the samples and to collect the data.

RESULTS

Ecology of Pseudomonas in dairy processing plants.The genetic diversity of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from four dairy processing plants was studied. A total of 338 putative Pseudomonas isolates were obtained from raw milk, processed milk, and environmental samples (Table 1). All 338 isolates were characterized using API 20 NE strips. Based on the API 20 NE results, 51% of the isolates were identified as P. fluorescens, 14% were identified as P. putida, and 25% were identified as either P. fluorescens or P. putida. The API 20 NE system was unable to identify 10% of the isolates to the species level.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Number of Pseudomonas isolates and ribotypes obtained from each dairy processing plant

Ribotyping was completed for 81 isolates with different API codes. The resulting ribotypes are shown in Table 2. Initially, ribotype patterns with similarity coefficients of >0.93, as calculated by the Riboprinter's software by use of band positions and intensities, were considered identical and were grouped together as one ribogroup with the same designation. Further refinement of these groupings was performed by visual evaluation of closely related ribotype patterns. A total of 42 different ribotypes were found among the 81 isolates tested (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Sources, ribotypes, and enzyme activities of Pseudomonas isolates

Eight of 42 (19%) ribotypes were found in more than one dairy, while the remaining 81% were found only in one dairy. None of the raw milk isolates was of the same ribotype as that of pasteurized milk isolates in any of the four dairies. Except for one ribotype, 72-S-3, the ribotype patterns of the isolates from milk collected in the first plant visit did not resemble the patterns from isolates collected in the second plant visit. In dairy plant D, ribotype 112-S-2 was found in both processed milk samples and in environmental samples, including those collected from the valve, floor, and drain. However, in the other three dairies, no connection was established between isolates from processed milk samples and those from environmental samples. In two of the dairies, the same ribotypes (82-S-4 and 57-S-8) were isolated from raw milk samples and environmental samples.

From dairy plant A, seven different ribotypes were isolated from raw milk, processed milk, and environmental samples (Table 1). Pseudomonas spp. could not be isolated from processed milk samples obtained during the first plant visit (the major contaminating organisms in these milk samples were Acinetobacter spp.). Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from raw milk and processed milk samples obtained during the second plant visit. None of the raw milk or environmental ribotypes matched the ribotypes from processed milk. Only one ribotype was isolated from the processed milk samples. As we were unable to isolate Pseudomonas from samples collected during the first visit, samples were also obtained during three additional plant visits following the second visit. No Pseudomonas was isolated from the additional samples. The SPC from milk obtained during those three visits were also very low, averaging 500 CFU/ml at 14 days postprocessing. Only four Pseudomonas colonies were isolated from environmental samples.

In dairy plant B, 14 different ribotypes were isolated from raw and processed milk and environmental samples (Table 1). Ribotype 82-S-4 was isolated from both raw milk and environmental (drain) samples. A total of 15 colonies were isolated from the milk samples collected during the first sampling period that had been plated at 7 days postprocessing. All of these were identified as P. fluorescens by API 20 NE (Table 2). The three strains selected bore ribotype 51-S-5. Another 15 colonies were isolated from the samples plated on day 14, and all of these were identified as P. putida by API 20 NE (Table 2). Of these, one isolate bore ribotype 384-S-2.

In dairy plant C, 13 different ribotypes were isolated from raw and processed milk and environmental samples (Table 1). Ribotype 72-S-3 was isolated from processed milk samples obtained during both the first and second plant visits.

Seventeen different ribotypes were isolated from raw and processed milk and environmental samples collected from dairy plant D (Fig. 1). Ribotype 112-S-2 was observed among isolates from processed milk, floor, valve, and drain samples. Ribotype 57-S-8 was isolated from both raw milk and environmental (drain) samples.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Riboprints of Pseudomonas isolates obtained from dairy processing plant D.

Spoilage potentials of Pseudomonas and relationships between ribotypes and enzyme activities.All Pseudomonas isolates were evaluated for production of extracellular protease, lipase, and lecithinase. Of the 338 Pseudomonas isolates, 51% were protease positive, 47% were lecithinase positive, and 67% were lipase positive. Lipolytic and proteolytic activities varied among the Pseudomonas strains. Most of the P. fluorescens strains were positive for all enzyme activities (69%), while most P. putida strains (87.5%) were negative for all enzyme activities. Isolates that were characterized as either P. fluorescens or P. putida by API 20 NE were mostly protease negative (93%); however, the majority of these isolates (75%) had lipase activity. No clear differences emerged among the enzyme activities between the milk isolates and the environmental isolates (Table 2).

Isolates bearing the same ribotype generally had similar extracellular enzymatic profiles (Table 3). The extracellular enzymatic activities and ribotypes were also closely related. Specifically, ribotypes 50-S-8 and 72-S-3 were composed of isolates with the highest extracellular lipase activities while the highest extracellular protease activity was seen in isolates grouped in ribotype 55-S-6 (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Relationship between ribotypes and enzyme activities of Pseudomonas spp. Mean activities and standard deviations are reported as follows: mean ratio reflecting protease activity = clearance zone diameter/colony size; mean ratio reflecting lecithinase activity = opaque zone diameter/colony size; lipase activity = mean color intensity; n = the number of isolates within a ribotype.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Ribotypes and enzyme activity profiles of Pseudomonas isolates

In general, the presence or absence of both extracellular lecithinase and lipase activities appeared to be correlated in this collection of isolates. Forty-five percent of the isolates had both lecithinase and lipase activities, while 31% had neither activity. On the other hand, 22% of the isolates had only lipase activity and just 2% of the isolates had lecithinase activity but no lipase activity.

Effect of Pseudomonas on the flavor of milk samples.For sensory analysis, milk was scored on a scale from 1 to 10, where any rating below 6 was considered poor, 6 to 7 was fair, and 8 to 10 was good. The overall scores were assigned with a predominant criticism. Table 4 presents the SPC, mean flavor scores of processed milk samples, and percentages of enzymatically active Pseudomonas isolates from the samples.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

SPC, mean flavor scores, and percentage of enzymatically active Pseudomonas isolates from processed milk samples

In general, sensory scores were considered “good” at 7 days postprocessing, with an average score of 7.5. Two products also retained good flavor scores (7.6 and 7.5) at 14 days postprocessing. In general, good flavor scores were associated with low numbers of bacteria. All rancid flavors were associated with the presence of lipase-producing Pseudomonas. We conclude that, with the exception of two samples examined in this study, the flavor defects of processed milk were associated with both high numbers of bacteria and the presence of degradative enzymatic activities among the contaminating Pseudomonas strains. One of the two exceptions was the plant B milk sample from the first visit which coagulated at 14 days postprocessing even though the Pseudomonas isolates obtained from the processed milk samples had none of the degradative enzymatic activities measured in this study. Despite the apparent absence of degradative Pseudomonas spp., the overall numbers of bacteria were high in this product (1.3 × 108 CFU/ml). Milk samples from dairy plant D (first visit) were positive for all enzyme activities tested and the SPC was high (1.9 × 108 CFU/ml), but the sensory panelists reported no serious flavor defects.

DISCUSSION

Our goals were to determine the association between Pseudomonas ribotypes and the organisms' milk spoilage potentials and to examine the genetic diversity of Pseudomonas spp. in milk and in the environment of dairy processing plants.

Among the 338 Pseudomonas isolates examined, 51% were identified as P. fluorescens. These results are consistent with previous observations indicating that P. fluorescens is the predominant organism in refrigerated milk. The presence of this microbe in processed milk samples likely reflects the presence of P. fluorescens in the dairy processing environment as well as its short generation time at refrigeration temperatures (8, 11, 17).

Ribotyping of Pseudomonas isolates revealed 42 different ribotype patterns among 81 isolates. This large number of different ribotypes indicates considerable ecologic diversity among Pseudomonas spp. within the dairy processing environment. This diversity contributes to the different spoilage patterns of milk products among the four dairy plants. Specifically, as shown in Table 2, 81% of ribotypes were found only in one plant. These results suggest multiple origins of Pseudomonas spp. that may be isolated from dairy processing plants.

Previous research has shown that gram-negative psychrotrophic bacteria such as Pseudomonas do not survive commercial pasteurization (8). Therefore, the presence of gram-negative bacteria in freshly pasteurized milk generally indicates postpasteurization contamination (8). In some cases, however, bacteria such as the normally heat-sensitive Pseudomonas can survive the heat treatments used in conventional pasteurization of milk if initial bacterial populations are extremely large (14). In this study, isolates from raw milk samples had different ribotypes than those of isolates from pasteurized milk samples, which suggests that processed milk contaminants were not survivors of pasteurization.

Processing environments commonly contribute to postpasteurization contamination of pasteurized milk products; specifically, filling machines are an important source of contamination of pasteurized milk (12, 15, 23, 25). The same ribotype was found in the processed milk samples and environmental samples of dairy plant D, which suggests that the processing environment was likely to have been the source of the contamination of the finished product. In the other three plants, none of the ribotypes isolated from environmental samples were identical to those found in finished products. Given the genetic diversity of the Pseudomonas spp. characterized in this study, the most likely explanation for this finding is that we did not sample the environmental source(s) responsible for postprocessing contamination of these milk products or that the isolates picked from the environmental sampling plates did not represent the full diversity of the strains present in the samples. In plant A, we could not isolate Pseudomonas spp. from the processed milk samples obtained during three plant visits. The numbers of Pseudomonas spp. obtained from environmental sources in the same plant were also very low. These findings provide further evidence that the processing environment serves as a probable source of contamination of processed milk, as a low level of environmental contamination would likely result in low levels of contamination of the finished product.

With the exception of ribotype 72-S-3 isolated in dairy plant C, different ribotypes were identified among isolates collected during different plant visits. One likely explanation for this observation is the high level of diversity among Pseudomonas isolates in these plants. Another possibility might be a lack of long-term colonization for the gram-negative Pseudomonas spp. in these dairy processing environments. In contrast, long-term existence in food processing environments has been reported for some gram-positive organisms (18, 22, 28). For example, Svensson et al. (28) reported that the same random amplified polymorphic DNA type of mesophilic Bacillus subtilis was isolated from a dairy plant over a 2-year period. Unnerstad et al. (reviewed in reference 1) reported that the same Listeria monocytogenes strain persisted in a dairy plant for at least 7 years. The long-term persistence of L. monocytogenes in poultry and seafood processing environments also has been reported (18, 22). A short-term existence for gram-negative microbes in contrast to the likelihood of a long-term colonization by gram-positive bacteria might indicate a fundamental difference in the ecology of these groups of organisms in the food processing environment.

Spoilage potentials of the Pseudomonas strains.SPC, PPC, and coliform counts are methods that are frequently used to monitor milk quality (3). However, poor correlations exist among the SPC, the PPC, the coliform count, and product shelf life (14). With the exception of the determination of the presence of very high initial bacterial counts, simple measurement of bacterial numbers present in freshly pasteurized products does not provide useful predictive insight into product shelf life. Craven and Macauley (11) showed that the presence of large populations of Pseudomonas spp. generally resulted in shorter shelf lives for pasteurized milk than if products were contaminated with other types of organisms. However, they also reported that some samples predominantly containing Pseudomonas spp. had shelf lives that were equal to or greater than those of samples predominantly containing other types of microorganisms. The growth rates and metabolic activities of contaminating organisms at refrigeration temperatures are the two most important factors that influence product shelf life (14).

Our results showed that 69% of the P. fluorescens strains were positive for all enzyme activities, while most P. putida strains (87.5%) were negative for all enzyme activities. These results correspond with those of Wiedmann et al. (32) in that the majority of the P. fluorescens strains have extracellular protease, lipase, and lecithinase activity while P. putida strains are usually negative for all enzyme activities. We conclude that P. fluorescens is an important spoilage organism in processed milk products. Our results show that the lecithinase and lipase activities of pseudomonads are usually associated. Seventy-six percent of the isolates either had both lecithinase and lipase activity or neither lecithinase nor lipase activity.

Ribotyping is very useful for the characterization of spoilage microflora. In this study, isolates that had the same ribotype, even if obtained from different sources, usually had the same extracellular-enzyme profiles (Table 3). We found considerable variation in the lipolytic and proteolytic activities of the Pseudomonas strains; however, isolates with the same ribotype usually had similar extracellular-enzyme activities (Fig. 2).

Effect of Pseudomonas on the flavor of milk samples.Growth of psychrotrophic bacteria after pasteurization is an important factor in milk lipolysis and proteolysis. Flavor defects generally develop in processed milk when the bacterial population of the milk rises to ≥107 CFU/ml (24). Off-flavors generally develop in three stages. First, milk loses its freshness. Then, it is perceived as stale. Finally, its products develop rancid, fruity, and bitter flavors. Bitter flavors usually accompany protein degradation. Soapy and rancid flavors usually are a result of lipid breakdown (8). Our results indicate that sensory characteristics depend on both the number of bacteria and their enzymatic activities. For example, although all Pseudomonas isolates obtained from plant A were positive for all three enzyme activities, no major flavor defects were reported, probably because of the low SPC of the samples. All rancid flavors were associated with lipase production capability among the Pseudomonas isolates. Although Pseudomonas isolates obtained from the first visit to plant B had no enzyme activity, milk coagulated by day 14 postprocessing. This defect was probably the consequence of protease production by other, non-Pseudomonas bacteria. Although Pseudomonas spp. are the main concern with regard to proteolytic degradation of milk, other proteolytic organisms such as Achromobacter, Aeromonas, Flavobacterium, and Xanthomonas spp. can be found in milk and can cause proteolytic degradation and milk coagulation (11, 26). Pseudomonas spp. isolates from milk samples obtained during the first visit to plant D were positive for all enzyme activities, but pronounced flavor defects were not detected despite the high SPC. The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that the presence of the Pseudomonas strains able to cause spoilage was low relative to the presence of other organisms with lower spoilage potentials.

Conclusions.We found that ribotyping is a discriminatory and useful typing method for differentiating Pseudomonas spp. capable of decreasing the shelf lives of fluid milk products. Ribotyping revealed a large genomic diversity among Pseudomonas spp. isolated from these dairy plants. Our results indicate that there is a relationship between bacterial ribotypes and their spoilage potentials. Ribotyping is a convenient and reliable method for identifying strains with food spoilage potential.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This paper was developed under the auspices of the Cornell University Center for Biotechnology, a New York State Center for Advanced Technology supported by the New York State Science and Technology Foundation and industrial partners. We thank the Turkish Ministry of Education for B.D.'s fellowship and Dairy Management, Inc. and the North East Dairy Foods Research Center (Ithaca, N.Y.) for financial support of this project.

Technical support from Steven Murphy and the Milk Quality Improvement Program through the New York State Milk Promotion Advisory Board are gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to Ruth Zadoks for critically reviewing the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 26 June 2002.
    • Accepted 10 October 2002.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Arimi, S. M., E. T. Ryser, T. J. Pritchard, and C. W. Donnelly. 1997. Diversity of Listeria ribotypes recovered from dairy cattle silage and dairy processing environments. J. Food Prot.60:811-816.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Boor, K. J. 2001. Fluid dairy product quality and safety: looking to the future. J. Dairy Sci.84:1-11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Braun, P., K. Fehlhaber, C. Klug, and K. Kopp. 1999. Investigations into the activity of enzymes produced by spoilage-causing bacteria. Food Microbiol.16:531-540.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Bruce, J. L., R. J. Hubner, E. M. Cole, C. I. McDowell, and J. A. Webster. 1995. Sets of EcoRI fragments containing ribosomal RNA sequences are conserved among different strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:5229-5233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Bruce, J. 1996. Automated system rapidly identifies and characterizes microorganisms in food. Food Technol.50:77-81.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Champagne, C. P., R. R. Laing, D. Roy, and A. A. Mafu. 1994. Psychrotrophs in dairy products: their effects and their control. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.34:1-30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Chapman, K. W., L. C. Rosenberry, D. K. Bandler, and K. J. Boor. 1998. Light-oxidized flavor development and vitamin A degradation in chocolate milk. J. Food Sci.63:930-934.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Cousin, M. A. 1982. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in milk and dairy products: a review. J. Food Prot.45:172-207.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Cousins, C. M., and A. J. Bramley. 1981. The microbiology of raw milk, p. 119-163. In R. K. Robinson (ed.), Dairy microbiology, vol. 1. Applied Science Publishers, Englewood, N.J.
  10. 10.↵
    Cox, J. M. 1993. The significance of psychrotrophic pseudomonads in dairy products. Aust. J. Dairy Technol.48:108-113.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Craven, H. M., and B. J. Macauley. 1992. Microorganisms in pasteurized milk after refrigerated storage. 1. Identification of types. Aust. J. Dairy Technol.47:38-45.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Eneroth, A., A. Christiansson, J. Brendehaug, and G. Molin. 1998. Critical contamination sites in the production line of pasteurized milk: with reference to the psychrotrophic spoilage flora. Int. Dairy J.8:829-834.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Garcia, M. L., B. Sanz, P. Garcia-Collia, and J. A. Ordonez. 1989. Activity and thermostability of the extracellular lipases and proteinases from pseudomonads isolated from raw milk. Milchwissenchaft44:547-549.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Griffiths, M. W., J. D. Phillips, and D. D. Muir. 1984. Post-pasteurization contamination: the major cause of failure of fresh dairy products. Hannah Res. 1984:77-87.
  15. 15.↵
    Gruetzmacher, T. J., and R. L. Bradley, Jr. 1998. Identification and control of processing variables that affect the quality and safety of fluid milk. J. Food Prot.62:625-631.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Harris, P. L., S. L. Cuppett, and L. B. Bullerman. 1990. A technique comparison of isolation of lipolytic bacteria. J. Food Prot.53:176-177.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Ingraham, J. L., and J. L. Stokes. 1959. Psychrotrophic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev.23:97-108.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Lawrence, L. M., and A. Gilmour. 1995. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from poultry products and from the poultry-processing environment by random amplification of polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61:2139-2144.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Marshall, R.T. (ed.). 1993. Standard methods for the examination of dairy products, 16th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  20. 20.↵
    Mayerhof, H. J., R. T. Marshall, C. H. White, and M. Lu. 1973. Characterization of a heat stable protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens P26. Appl. Microbiol.25:44-48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Moseley, W. K. 1980. Pinpointing post-pasteurization contamination. J. Food Prot.43:414.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Norton, D. M., M. A. McCamey, K. L. Gall, J. M. Scarlett, K. J. Boor, and M. Wiedmann. 2001. Molecular studies on the ecology of Listeria monocytogenes in the smoked fish processing industry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67:198-205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Ralyea, R. D., M. Wiedmann, and K. J. Boor. 1998. Bacterial tracking in a dairy production system using phenotypic and ribotyping methods. J. Food Prot.61:1336-1340.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Schroder, M. J. A., C. M. Cousins, and C. H. McKinnon. 1982. Effect of psychrotrophic post-pasteurization contamination on the keeping quality at 11 and 5°C of HTST-pasteurized milk in the UK. J. Dairy Res.49:619-630.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Schroder, M. J. A. 1984. Origins and levels of post pasteurization contamination of milk in the dairy and their effects on keeping quality. J. Dairy Res.51:59-67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Shah, N. P. 1994. Psychrotrophs in milk. Milchwissenchaft49:432-437.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Sorhaug, T., and L. Stepaniak. 1997. Psychrotrophs and their enzymes in milk and dairy products: quality aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol.8:35-40.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Svensson, B., A. Eneroth, J. Brendehaug, and A. Christiansson. 1999. Investigation of Bacillus cereus contamination sites in a dairy plant with RAPD-PCR. Intl. Dairy J.9:903-912.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Ternstrom, A., A. M. Lindberg, and G. Molin. 1993. Classification of the spoilage flora of raw and pasteurized bovine milk, with special reference to Pseudomonas and Bacillus. J. Appl. Bacteriol.75:25-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    van der Vossen, J. M., and H. Hofstra. 1996. DNA based typing, identification and detection systems for food spoilage microorganisms: development and implementation. Intl. J. Food Microbiol.33:35-49.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Vanderzant, C., and D. F. Splittstoesser (ed.). 1992. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  32. 32.↵
    Wiedmann, M., D. Weilmeier, S. S. Dineen, R. Ralyea, and K. J. Boor. 1999. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:2085-2095.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 130-138; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 130-138; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Food Contamination
Food-Processing Industry
Genetic Variation
milk
Pseudomonas

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336