Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants

Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Belgin Dogan
1Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn J. Boor
1Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kjb4@cornell.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Riboprints of Pseudomonas isolates obtained from dairy processing plant D.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Relationship between ribotypes and enzyme activities of Pseudomonas spp. Mean activities and standard deviations are reported as follows: mean ratio reflecting protease activity = clearance zone diameter/colony size; mean ratio reflecting lecithinase activity = opaque zone diameter/colony size; lipase activity = mean color intensity; n = the number of isolates within a ribotype.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Number of Pseudomonas isolates and ribotypes obtained from each dairy processing plant

    Sample sourceDairy ADairy BDairy CDairy DTotal
    No. of isolatesNo. of ribotypesaNo. of isolatesNo. of ribotypesNo. of isolatesNo. of ribotypesNo. of isolatesNo. of ribotypesNo. of isolatesNo. of ribotypes
    Processed milk281 (3)606 (9)575 (12)568 (12)20121 (36)
    Raw milk123 (6)104 (5)103 (3)155 (6)4715 (20)
    Environment43 (3)305 (5)235 (5)336 (12)9017 (25)
    Total547 (12)10014 (19)9013 (20)10417 (30)33842 (81)
    • ↵ a Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of isolates selected for ribotyping.

  • TABLE 2.

    Sources, ribotypes, and enzyme activities of Pseudomonas isolates

    Dairy and visitStrainAPI 20 NE identificationaRibotypeSample source (day of plating)Enzyme activityb
    ProteaseLecithinaseLipase
    Dairy A
        SecondcD3-105 P. fluorescens 407-S-3Processed milk (7)2.8 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.13
    D3-111 P. fluorescens 407-S-3Processed milk (7)2.6 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.03
    D3-121 P. fluorescens 407-S-3Processed milk (14)2.8 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.13
    D3-221 P. fluorescens 48-S-6Raw milk2.9 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.11
    D3-222 P. fluorescens 48-S-6Raw milk2.7 ± 0.01.3 ± 0.11
    D3-223 P. putida d 82-S-6Raw milk3.6 ± 0.5—3
    D3-224 P. fluorescens 82-S-6Raw milk3.6 ± 0.2—3
    D3-227 P. fluorescens 55-S-6Raw milk3.7 ± 0.1—3
    D3-229 P. putida d 82-S-6Raw milk3.7 ± 0.4—3
        ThirdD3-381 P. fluorescens 542-S-7Floor2.1 ± 0.22.1 ± 0.21
    D3-382 P. fluorescens 424-S-8Floor2.8 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.11
    D3-384 P. fluorescens e 542-S-8Floor———
    Dairy B
        FirstD3-046 P. fluorescens e 51-S-5Processed milk (7)———
    D3-047 P. fluorescens e 51-S-5Processed milk (7)———
    D3-050 P. fluorescens e 51-S-5Processed milk (7)———
    D3-061 P. putida 384-S-2Processed milk (14)———
        SecondD3-313 P. fluorescens 524-S-5Processed milk (1)3.0 ± 0.1—3
    D3-314 P. putida d 57-S-5Processed milk (7)——1
    D3-321 P. putida d 57-S-5Processed milk (7)——2
    D3-326 P. aeroginosa d 524-S-7Processed milk (7)1.7 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.21
    D3-309 P. putida d 82-S-6Processed milk (14)1.6 ± 0.1—2
    D3-153 P. fluorescens f 408-S-1Raw milk2.4 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.2—
    D3-156 P. fluorescens 424-S-8Raw milk1.4 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.11
    D3-157 P. fluorescens 408-S-3Raw milk—2.2 ± 0.2—
    D3-158 P. putida 82-S-4Raw milk———
    D3-161 P. fluorescens k 408-S-3Raw milk—2.3 ± 0.31
        ThirdD3-352 P. fluorescens 50-S-8Floor2.5 ± 0.42.4 ± 0.24
    D3-367 P. putida 537-S-7Floor———
    D3-363 P. putida 537-S-5Inside filling bowl2.5 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.12
    D3-364 P. fluorescens e 537-S-6Inside filling bowl———
    D3-375 P. putida 82-S-4Drain———
    Dairy C
        FirstD3-016 P. fluorescens 48-S-7Processed milk (7)2.7 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.11
    D3-017 P. fluorescens e 375-S-5Processed milk (7)——4
    D3-018 P. fluorescens e 375-S-5Processed milk (7)——4
    D3-021 P. fluorescens 48-S-7Processed milk (7)2.6 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.21
    D3-029 P. putida 72-S-3Processed milk (7)——4
    D3-032 P. putida 377-S-5Processed milk (14)———
    D3-034 P. putida 377-S-5Processed milk (14)———
        SecondD3-147 P. fluorescens e 72-S-3Processed milk (1)——4
    D3-133 P. fluorescens e 72-S-3Processed milk (7)——4
    D3-168 P. fluorescens 72-S-3Processed milk (14)——4
    D3-170 P. fluorescens e 72-S-3Processed milk (14)——4
    D3-175 P. fluorescens 408-S-8Processed milk (14)3.2 ± 0.32.3 ± 0.34
    D3-148 P. fluorescens 112-S-6Raw milk3.0 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.03
    D3-149 P. fluorescens 409-S-3Raw milk3.2 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.33
    D3-167 P. putida 384-S-2Raw milk———
        ThirdD3-328 P. fluorescens 536-S-6Floor———
    D3-331 P. fluorescens 57-S-8Floor2.8 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.22
    D3-338 P. putida 536-S-7Drain———
    D3-348 P. fluorescens 536-S-8Overhead pipe filler—1.53 ± 0.0—
    D3-350 P. fluorescens 112-S-2Overhead pipe filler3.3 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.11
    Dairy D
        FirstD3-077 P. fluorescens 384-S-3Processed milk (7)2.5 ± 0.22.6 ± 0.22
    D3-086 P. fluorescens 97-S-4Processed milk (7)2.7 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.14
    D3-092 P. fluorescens 543-S-6Processed milk (14)1.9 ± 0.02.5 ± 0.21
    D3-094 P. fluorescens 97-S-4Processed milk (14)1.3 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.32/PICK>
        SecondD3-182 P. fluorescens g 112-S-2Processed milk (7)2.8 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.11
    D3-183 P. fluorescens e 409-S-6Processed milk (7)———
    D3-184—409-S-6Processed milk (7)———
    D3-187 P. putida h 409-S-8Processed milk (7)———
    D3-193 P. fluorescens 416-S-8Processed milk (7)3.4 ± 0.41.8 ± 0.21
    D3-195 P. fluorescens 422-S-2Processed milk (14)2.5 ± 0.4——
    D3-196 P. fluorescens 422-S-2Processed milk (14)2.6 ± 0.2——
    D3-197 P. fluorescens 422-S-2Processed milk (14)2.7 ± 0.3——
    D3-180 P. fluorescens 57-S-8Raw milk3.0 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.02
    D3-181 P. fluorescens 409-S-5Raw milk3.0 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.01
    D3-210 P. putida d 57-S-5Raw milk——1
    D3-211 P. fluorescens e 48-S-6Raw milk—1.8 ± 0.5—
    D3-212 P. fluorescens 48-S-6Raw milk2.4 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.24
    D3-213 P. fluorescens e 72-S-3Raw milk——4
        ThirdD3-266 P. fluorescens 524-S-1Floor2.6 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.31
    D3-267 P. fluorescens 112-S-2Floor2.9 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.01
    D3-269 P. fluorescens 112-S-2Floor3.0 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.21
    D3-270 P. fluorescens i 112-S-2Floor2.6 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.01
    D3-274 P. fluorescens j 537-S-2Floor———
    D3-276 P. fluorescens g 112-S-2Valve3.0 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.11
    D3-283 P. fluorescens 112-S-2Valve3.3 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.11
    D3-286 P. fluorescens 112-S-2Drain2.7 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.21
    D3-287 P. fluorescens 57-S-8Drain3.0 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.02
    D3-293 P. fluorescens j 82-S-6Drain2.7 ± 0.1—3
    D3-294 P. fluorescens 536-S-4Drain3.3 ± 0.52.30 ± 0.21
    D3-296 P. putida 82-S-6Pipe lines2.0 ± 0.3—2
    • ↵ a Species were assigned by best likelihood.

    • ↵ b Enzyme activities ± standard deviations are reported as follows: mean ratio reflecting protease activity = clearance zone diameter/colony size; mean ratio reflecting lecithinase activity = opaque-zone diameter/colony size; lipase activity = mean color intensity; —, not detectable.

    • ↵ c Pseudomonas spp. could not be isolated on the first visit.

    • ↵ d Another possibility is P. fluorescens.

    • ↵ e Another possibility is P. putida.

    • ↵ f Another possibility is Burkholderia cepacia.

    • ↵ g Other possibilities are Burkholderia pseudomallei, P. aeruginosa, and Chromobacterium violaceum.

    • ↵ h Other possibilities are P. fluorescens and Ralstonia pichettii.

    • ↵ i Other possibilities are P. stutzeri and P. putida.

    • ↵ j Another possibility is P. aeruginosa.

    • ↵ k Other possibilities are B. cepacia and Ochrobactrum anthropi.

  • TABLE 3.

    Ribotypes and enzyme activity profiles of Pseudomonas isolates

    RibotypeNo. of isolatesEnzyme activity profileSource(s)a and/or reference
    ProteaseLecithinaseLipase
    48-S-610+++A2, D2; 32
    2−+−D2; 32
    48-S-712+++C1; 32
    1++−32
    50-S-83+++B3; 32
    51-S-55−−−B1; 32
    55-S-62+−+A2; 32
    57-S-54−−+B1, D2; 32
    57-S-83+++C3, D2, D3
    1−−−32
    72-S-38−−+C1, D2, 32
    1−−−32
    82-S-43−−−B2, B3; 32
    82-S-67+−+A2, B1, D3; 32
    1+−−32
    97-S-43+++D1; 32
    111-S-52+++32
    112-S-28+++C3, D1, D3
    375-S-52−−+C1
    377-S-52−−−C1
    384-S-22−−−B1, C2
    407-S-33+++A1
    408-S-32−++B2
    409-S-62−−−D1
    422-S-23+−−D1
    424-S-82+++A3, B2
    • ↵ a Letters indicate dairy plants A, B, C, and D, and numbers indicate samples from processed milk (1), raw milk (2), or the plant environment (3).

  • TABLE 4.

    SPC, mean flavor scores, and percentage of enzymatically active Pseudomonas isolates from processed milk samples

    VisitSample source and day of platingSPC/mlNo. of Pseudomonas isolates tested% of Pseudomonas isolates with enzyme activityFlavor scoreSensory result(s)
    ProteaseLecithinaseLipase
    FirstDairy B
        Day 77.1 × 106150007.8Lacks freshness, light oxidized
        Day 141.3 × 108160001Coagulated
    Dairy C
        Day 71.2 × 1071513801006.4Lacks freshness, rancid
        Day 142.6 × 10815080801Rancid
    Dairy D
        Day 71.5 × 104141001001008.4Lacks freshness
        Day 141.9 × 108141001001007.7Lacks freshness
    SecondDairy A
        Day 72 × 103151001001008.7No criticism
        Day 145.3 × 104131001001007.6Lacks freshness
    Dairy B
        Day 76 × 1071436781001.3Rancid
        Day 144.7 × 10814642171NTaNT
    Dairy C
        Day 72.7 × 10714001005.1Fruity or fermented, lacks freshness
        Day 141.4 × 1081267581002.5Rancid
    Dairy D
        Day 72.4 × 105133838388.2Cooked, lacks freshness
        Day 143.2 × 1081510000NTNT
    • ↵ a NT, not tasted due to presence of coliforms.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 130-138; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants
Belgin Dogan, Kathryn J. Boor
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 130-138; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Food Contamination
Food-Processing Industry
Genetic Variation
milk
Pseudomonas

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336