Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

l-Proline Accumulation and Freeze Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Are Caused by a Mutation in the PRO1 Gene Encoding γ-Glutamyl Kinase

Yuko Morita, Shigeru Nakamori, Hiroshi Takagi
Yuko Morita
Department of Bioscience, Fukui Prefectural University, 4-1-1 Kenjojima, Fukui 910-1195, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeru Nakamori
Department of Bioscience, Fukui Prefectural University, 4-1-1 Kenjojima, Fukui 910-1195, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Takagi
Department of Bioscience, Fukui Prefectural University, 4-1-1 Kenjojima, Fukui 910-1195, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hiro@fpu.ac.jp
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.212-219.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We previously isolated a mutant which showed a high tolerance to freezing that correlated with higher levels of intracellular l-proline derived from l-proline analogue-resistant mutants. The mutation responsible for the analogue resistance and l-proline accumulation was a single nuclear dominant mutation. By introducing the mutant-derived genomic library into a non-l-proline-utilizing strain, the mutant was found to carry an allele of the wild-type PRO1 gene encoding γ-glutamyl kinase, which resulted in a single amino acid replacement; Asp (GAC) at position 154 was replaced by Asn (AAC). Interestingly, the allele of PRO1 was shown to enhance the activities of γ-glutamyl kinase and γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase, both of which catalyze the first two steps of l-proline synthesis from l-glutamate and which together may form a complex in vivo. When cultured in liquid minimal medium, yeast cells expressing the mutated γ-glutamyl kinase were found to accumulate intracellular l-proline and showed a prominent increase in cell viability after freezing at −20°C compared to the viability of cells harboring the wild-type PRO1 gene. These results suggest that the altered γ-glutamyl kinase results in stabilization of the complex or has an indirect effect on γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase activity, which leads to an increase in l-proline production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The approach described in this paper could be a practical method for breeding novel freeze-tolerant yeast strains.

Frozen-dough technology has recently been used in the baking industry to supply oven-fresh bakery products to consumers. Many freeze-tolerant yeasts have been isolated from natural sources and under natural culture conditions, and many have also been constructed by conventional mutation techniques (11, 13, 21, 23, 25). However, the mechanism of freeze tolerance is not well understood, and a baker's yeast that provides good leavening qualities for both sweet- and lean-thawed doughs after frozen storage has not yet been developed.

We previously investigated the cryoprotective effects of amino acids on freezing stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and found that l-proline, which is known to be an osmoprotectant (5, 9), has cryoprotective activity that is nearly equal that of glycerol or trehalose (38). In bacteria, l-proline biosynthesis from l-glutamate has been shown to be regulated by end product inhibition of γ-glutamyl kinase (γ-GK) activity (26, 35). l-Proline-overproducing mutants of Escherichia coli (7), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (4), and Serratia marcescens (27) have mutations which result in desensitization of l-proline feedback inhibition of γ-GK. S. cerevisiae synthesizes l-proline from l-glutamate via the intermediates γ-glutamyl phosphate (γ-GP), glutamate-γ-semialdehyde (GSA), and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) by almost the same pathway found in bacteria (Fig. 1). Three enzymes, γ-GK (the PRO1 gene product), γ-GP reductase (γ-GPR) (the PRO2 gene product), and P5C reductase (the PRO3 gene product), are involved in this pathway, but the rate-limiting step has not been determined yet. On the other hand, l-proline is converted to l-glutamate within mitochondria by the action of two enzymes, proline oxidase (the PUT1 gene product) and P5C dehydrogenase (the PUT2 gene product) (Fig. 1). Recently, we showed that a put1 disruptant in minimal medium supplemented with external l-proline accumulated higher levels of l-proline in its cells and had greater tolerance to freezing and desiccation stresses than the wild-type strain (39). Our results indicated that there is a positive correlation between intracellular l-proline levels and resistance to these stresses in S. cerevisiae.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Biosynthesis and metabolism of l-proline in S. cerevisiae. The genes which encode enzymes are indicated in parentheses.

In general, microorganisms that overproduce various amino acids have been obtained by isolating mutants resistant to analogues of corresponding amino acids (24, 45). We therefore isolated toxic l-proline analogue l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZC)-resistant mutants derived from the put1-deficient strain of S. cerevisiae (38). After cultivation in minimal medium, some of the AZC-resistant mutants were found to accumulate larger amounts of intracellular l-proline than the parent and showed prominent increases in cell viability compared to the cell viability of the parent after samples were frozen in the minimal medium. Thus, in the present study, we identified the gene involved in l-proline accumulation in an AZC-resistant mutant. In addition, a possible mechanism for l-proline accumulation is discussed below.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast and bacterial strains.All yeasts used in this study were strains of S. cerevisiae. MB329-17C (MATα ura3-52 trp1 put1-54) and MB379-4C (MATahis4-42 put1-54), derived from crosses between S288C and Σ1278b, were mutant strains deficient in proline oxidase (put1 mutation) and were supplied by M. C. Brandriss (42). FH515, an AZC-resistant mutant strain with higher levels of intracellular proline, was isolated previously from strain MB329-17C after ethyl methanesulfonate treatment (38). In this study, put1 gene disruptant strain INVDput1 (MATahis3-Δ1 leu2 trp1-289 ura3-52 put1::URA3) and put1 and pro1 gene disruptant strain INVDput1pro1 (MATahis3-Δ1 leu2 trp1-289 ura3-52 put1::URA3 pro1::CgHIS3) were constructed from strain INVSc1 (MATahis3-Δ1 leu2 trp1-289 ura3-52) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), which is the wild-type strain with a S288C background. E. coli strain DH5α [F− λ− φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA argF)U169 deoR recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rk−k+) supE44 thi-1 gyrA96] was used to construct the yeast genomic library and to subclone the yeast gene.

Plasmids.Two S. cerevisiae-E. coli shuttle vectors, p366 (ATCC 77163) and pRS415 (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.), both of which contain the bacterial ampicillin resistance gene and the S. cerevisiae LEU2 gene, were used for constructing a yeast genomic library and for cloning the PRO1 gene, respectively. Centromere plasmid p366 was derived from YCp50 (30) containing the centromere of chromosome IV (CEN4) by removing most of the URA3 gene as a 1.89-kb SalI/SmaI fragment and replacing it with a 2.23-kb SalI/XhoI fragment containing the LEU2 gene. Plasmid pCgHIS3 (supplied by S. Harashima) was used for disruption of the PRO1 gene. The plasmid vectors pBluescript II SK+ (Toyobo Biochemicals, Osaka, Japan) and YEp24 (3) harboring the URA3 gene were used for subcloning and for disrupting the PUT1 gene, respectively.

Culture media.The media used for growth of S. cerevisiae were SD medium (2% glucose, 0.67% Bacto Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids [Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.]) and YPD (2% glucose, 1% Bacto Yeast Extract [Difco], 2% Bacto Peptone [Difco]). SD medium contains ammonium sulfate (0.1%) as the nitrogen source. When appropriate, required supplements were added to the media for auxotrophic strains. Yeast strains were also cultured on SD agar plates containing AZC (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). The E. coli recombinant strains were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (32) containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml). If necessary, 2% agar was added to solidify the medium.

Genetic analysis.Genetic crosses, sporulation, tetrad analysis, and complementation analysis were carried out by standard procedures as previously described (30).

Disruption of the PUT1 and PRO1 genes.The DNA fragment of the PUT1 gene encoding proline oxidase was prepared by PCR performed with genomic DNA from S. cerevisiae INVSc1 and oligonucleotide primers 5′-ACG CGT CGA CAA AGC CAG TTG TCC AGA C-3′ and 5′-GAC GAG CTC AGT CCT TCC CAC CTG ATA-3′ (the underlined sequences are the positions of SalI and SacI sites, respectively) based on the available nucleotide sequences by using a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). A unique 2.6-kb amplified band for the PUT1 gene was digested with SalI and SacI and then ligated to the SalI and SacI sites of pBluescript II SK+. The plasmid harboring the PUT1 gene was designated pPUT1. Plasmid pPUT1U was then constructed by deleting the HindIII-HindlII fragment in the PUT1 gene from plasmid pPUT1 and inserting the 1.2-kb HindIII fragment containing the URA3 gene of plasmid YEp24 by ligation. For PUT1 gene disruption, the 2.0-kb SalI-SacI fragment containing put1::URA3 of pPUT1U was integrated into the PUT1 locus in strain INVSc1 by transformation. The Ura+ phenotype was selected, and the correct disruption event was confirmed by using the chromosomal PCR.

For PRO1 gene disruption, a DNA fragment containing the Candida glabrata HIS3 gene was amplified by PCR performed with plasmid pCgHIS3 and oligonucleotide primers 5′-TTA CTA CGT TGT CTT ATT GGG AGC CGA CGG GAT GAG GAA GGT TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT-3′ and 5′-CCC CCA TCA CAT CCG GAT ACA AAT GGT CAG ACG ACC AAA TCA CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACC-3′ (the underlining indicates the sequences 400 bp upstream of the ATG initiation codon and 450 bp downstream of the TGA termination codon of the PRO1 gene, respectively). A unique 1.78-kb amplified band containing the C. glabrata HIS3 gene was purified and then integrated into the PRO1 locus in strain INVDput1 by transformation. The His+ Pro− phenotype was selected, and the correct disruption was verified by chromosomal PCR analysis.

Isolation of the gene involved in intracellular l-proline accumulation.The enzymes used for DNA manipulation were obtained from Takara Shuzo (Kyoto, Japan). Conventional techniques (29) were used for S. cerevisiae genomic DNA preparation and transformation. Genomic DNA was prepared from mutant FH515 and partially digested with Sau3AI. The Sau3AI fragments larger than 5 kb were ligated into the unique BamHI site of the p366 vector. A CEN4- and LEU2-based FH515 genomic library containing more than 30,000 independent E. coli clones was introduced into S. cerevisiae INVDput1, and transformants were selected on SD medium containing 100 μg of AZC per ml. Plasmids prepared from colonies capable of growing on AZC-containing medium were then shuttled into E. coli DH5α and back into yeast strain INVDput1 to retest AZC resistance. The plasmids were sequenced to define the ends of the insert DNA by using primers YCP50+ (5′-TCC TGC TCG CTT CGC TAC TT-3′) and YCP50- (5′-AAA CAA GCG CTC ATG AGC CC-3′), which flank the BamHI site of p366, with a model 377 DNA sequencer from PE Biosystems by using the dideoxy chain termination method. The sequence obtained was compared to the yeast genome by using the BLAST program.

Construction of plasmids for expression of the PRO1 gene in S. cerevisiae.A fragment of the PRO1 gene including the probable TATA box sequences (20) and the tripartite terminator (20) was prepared by PCR performed with genomic DNA from strains MB329-17C and FH515 and oligonucleotide primers 5′-ACC CAA GCT TTG GTC AGT GGC ACA G-3′ and 5′-ACC CGA GCT CGA AGG ATT TTA ACG GAT CAC-3′ (the underlined sequences are the positions of a HindIII site and a SacI site, respectively). The unique 1.8-kb band amplified from genomic DNA of MB329-17C and FH515 was digested with HindIII and SacI and then ligated to the large fragment of pRS415 digested with HindIII and SacI to construct pRS-WTPRO1 and pRS-D154NPRO1, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of the PRO1 gene were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Enzyme assays.To determine the activities of γ-GK (EC 2.7.2.11), γ-GPR (EC 1.2.1.41), and P5C reductase (EC 1.5.1.2), yeast cells were grown in 50 ml of SD medium containing ammonium sulfate as the nitrogen source at 30°C for 24 h with shaking. Whole-cell extracts were prepared by vortexing the cells with glass beads. Ammonium sulfate precipitates (70% saturation) of the extracts were then desalted with a PD-10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, England) and used as enzyme sources. Protein concentrations were determined with a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) by using bovine serum albumin as the standard protein.

γ-GK activity was assayed by the procedure of Smith et al. (35); the reaction mixture (final volume, 0.25 ml; pH 7.0) contained 50 mM l-glutamate, 10 mM ATP, 20 mM MgCl2, 100 mM hydroxylamine-HCl, 50 mM Tris base, and the enzyme plus water. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min to 2 h, and then the reaction was terminated by addition of 1 ml of stop solution (55 g of FeCl3 · 6H2O per liter, 20 g of trichloroacetic acid per liter, 21 ml of 12 N HCl per liter). Precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation, and the absorbance at 535 nm was recorded by using a blank identical to the preparation described above except that it lacked ATP. The amount of γ-glutamyl hydroxamate was determined from the absorbance at 535 nm by comparison with a standard curve for γ-glutamyl hydroxamate (Sigma). One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of γ-glutamyl hydroxamate per h.

γ-GPR activity was assayed as described by Hayzer and Leisinger (12). The activity was not detectable in the forward (biosynthetic) direction due to the lability of γ-GP. To separate the P5C dehydrogenase activity which converts P5C to l-proline with the aid of NAD+, we measured the reverse reaction of γ-GPR by phosphate-dependent reduction of NADP+ with GSA (derived from equilibrium with P5C) as the substrate. The reaction mixture (final volume, 1 ml; pH 7.0) contained 2 mM P5C prepared as described previously (37), 1 mM NADP+, 100 mM KH2PO4, 50 mM imidazole base, and the enzyme plus water. The increase in the absorbance at 340 nm was determined at 30°C by using a blank identical to the preparation described above except that it lacked KH2PO4. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 nmol of NADPH per min.

P5C reductase activity was assayed as described by Brandriss and Falvey (1). The reaction mixture (final volume, 1 ml; pH 7.0) contained 1 mM P5C, 0.4 mM NADH, 50 mM TAPS buffer, and the enzyme plus water. The decrease in the absorbance at 340 nm was determined at 30°C by using a blank identical to the preparation described above except that it lacked P5C. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 nmol of NAD+ per min.

In addition, disruption of the PUT1 gene was confirmed by measurement of proline oxidase (EC 1.4.3.2) activity, which monitors the amount of the P5C-o-aminobenzaldehyde complex, as previously described (2). One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 nmol of P5C per min.

Intracellular contents of l-proline and freeze tolerance test.In a 500-ml flask, yeast cells were grown in 50 ml of SD medium at 30°C for 48 h with shaking to the stationary phase. For determination of the intracellular l-proline content, 5 ml of cell suspension (approximately 5 × 108 cells) was removed, and the cells were washed twice with 0.9% NaCl and suspended in 0.5 ml of distilled water. A 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube containing cells was transferred to a boiling water bath, and intracellular amino acids were extracted by boiling the preparation for 10 min. After centrifugation (5 min at 15,000 × g), the l-proline content in the supernatant was quantitated with an amino acid analyzer (l-8500A; Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan). The l-proline content was expressed as a percentage of the dry weight.

For the freeze tolerance test, 0.1 ml of cell suspension (approximately 1 × 107 cells) was stored at −20°C. Under these conditions, it took about 1 h until the cells were frozen, assuming that the cooling rate was low (approximately 0.5 to 1.0°C/min). Samples of the frozen cells were thawed at room temperature for 15 min, serial dilutions in distilled water were prepared, and aliquots were plated immediately on YPD plates. After incubation at 30°C for 2 days, the survival rates were expressed as percentages, calculated as follows: (number of colonies after freezing at −20°C/(number of colonies before freezing) × 100.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The GenBank accession numbers for PRO1, PUT1, and the E. coli γ-GK gene are M85293 , M18107 , and X00786 , respectively.

RESULTS

Analysis of the mutant with l-proline accumulation.First, AZC-resistant mutants were divided into three classes on the basis of an allelism test and growth characteristics. In particular, class I strains (exemplified by strain FH515) showed a prominent increase in cell viability compared to the viability of the parent strain after they were frozen in the medium and crossed with a wild-type strain of the opposite mating type (MB379-4C). Each heterozygous diploid grew on AZC-containing medium, indicating that the AZC-resistant growth phenotype of the mutant was dominant (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Growth phenotypes on AZC-containing medium, intracellular l-proline contents before freezing, and cell viabilities after freezing of yeast strains and tetrads from the heterozygous diploid (FH515 × MB379-4C)

Tetrad analyses of the diploid showed 2:2 segregation for AZC-resistant growth, indicating that the mutation was a single nuclear mutation (Table 1). The findings also suggested that l-proline accumulation was linked to AZC resistance (Table 1). Accordingly, mutant strain FH515 was used to clone the gene involved in l-proline accumulation. The members of the other classes of AZC-resistant mutants differed from the class I mutants in that they failed to produce l-proline and hence were not studied further.

Mutant that accumulated l-proline carried an allele of the PRO1 gene.To identify the mutated gene involved in l-proline accumulation in mutant FH515, we prepared an FH515-derived genome DNA library in single-copy vector p366 containing the LEU2 gene in E. coli strain DH5α. In addition, to accumulate l-proline in the host cells, a put1 disruptant that did not utilize l-proline was constructed from strain INVSc1. Proline oxidase activity was hardly detectable in put1 disruptant INVDput1 (data not shown). We then transformed INVDput1 with the genome DNA library and incubated the transformants on Leu− solid medium containing 100 μg of AZC per ml at 30°C for several days. One plasmid (pYH1) was recovered from the only Leu+ transformant which showed the AZC-resistant phenotype. As shown in Fig. 2, when pYH1 was used to retransform strain INVDput1, all the Leu+ transformants were found to grow on AZC-containing medium and to accumulate an increased amount of l-proline (0.38% of dry weight), suggesting that the mutated gene resided in the plasmid.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Growth phenotypes with AZC of S. cerevisiae strains. Strains INVSc1, INVDput1, INVDput1(pYH1), INVDput1(p366), INVDput1pro1(pRS-D154NPRO1), and INVDput1pro1(pRS-WTPRO1) were cultivated on SD medium containing AZC (50 μg/ml) at 30°C for 3 days.

The nucleotide sequence of the ends of the inserted DNA showed that pYH1 had an approximately 6.5-kb fragment of chromosome IV, containing three open reading frames (ATP5, BFR2, and PRO1 genes). Subcloning of this region indicated that the PRO1 gene encoding γ-GK in pYH1 conferred AZC resistance and l-proline accumulation to strain INVDput1, which had the wild-type PRO1 gene on the chromosome; these findings agree with the results of a genetic analysis which showed that the AZC-resistant growth phenotype of the FH515 mutant was dominant. We therefore sequenced the PRO1 gene in pYH1 and found that a single-base change from G to A at position 460 occurred, leading to replacement of aspartate with asparagine at position 154 in the γ-GK enzyme; this conclusion was based on the wild-type sequence (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained by direct sequencing of the PCR products from the chromosomal DNA of the wild-type (MB329-17C) and mutant (FH515) strains. The same single-amino-acid substitution at position 154 (Asp154Asn) was observed in the mutant, and no mutations were found in the 5′ upstream region and the 3′ untranslated sequence of γ-GK. Moreover, the mutation at position 154 in the S. cerevisiae γ-GK is novel because different mutations in other amino acid residues required for feedback inhibition of γ-GK by l-proline were identified in bacterial and plant genes that have been studied (Fig. 3B) (6, 7, 18, 27, 46).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Amino acid replacement of Asp (GAC) at position 154 by Asn (AAC) in mutant FH515. (A) The numbers at the top and the bottom are the positions in the nucleotide sequence and the amino acid sequence, respectively (20). (B) Comparison of the S. cerevisiae γ-GK amino acid sequence (SC) (amino acids 107 to 157) with the E. coli γ-GK amino acid sequence (EC) (amino acids 101 to 151). Identical amino acids are indicated by vertical lines. The arrow at the top shows the mutation found in S. cerevisiae γ-GK in this study, and the arrows at the bottom indicate the mutations responsible for desensitization of l-proline feedback inhibition of γ-GK proteins in E. coli (6), S. marcescens (36), and V. aconitifolia (16).

Mutant which carried an allele of PRO1 showed an increase in both γ-GK and γ-GPR activities.Several studies of l-proline biosynthesis in bacterial cells have shown that γ-GK is the rate-limiting enzyme and is subject to feedback inhibition by l-proline (26, 35). In plants, the first steps of l-proline biosynthesis from l-glutamate are catalyzed by P5C synthetase (an EC number has not been not assigned), a bifunctional enzyme with γ-GK and γ-GPR activities (15, 44); the γ-GK activity of the P5C synthetase was also found to be sensitive to l-proline. In contrast, the PRO1 gene of S. cerevisiae was regulated by the general amino acid control system, which increased the expression of many amino acid biosynthetic genes in cells subjected to amino acid starvation conditions (20). However, feedback inhibition of γ-GK activity remains unknown. The crude extracts prepared from the wild-type (MB329-17C) and mutant (FH515) strains were assayed for γ-GK activity (Table 2). Unlike the bacterial and plant enzymes, the S. cerevisiae wild-type γ-GK showed no inhibition in the presence of 10 mM l-proline and 30% inhibition in the presence of 50 mM l-proline. These results indicate that the S. cerevisiae γ-GK, which has high sequence homology with E. coli γ-GK (level of identity, 38%) (20), was virtually insensitive to the physiological concentration of l-proline. In the mutant, the γ-GK activity was somewhat higher (approximately 25% higher) than the activity of the wild-type enzyme in the presence or absence of l-proline and was also inhibited only slightly by l-proline.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

γ-GK, γ-GPR, and P5C reductase activities of the S. cerevisiae strains expressing wild-type and mutated γ-GK

In E. coli, γ-GK and γ-GPR are thought to form a complex to provide protection to the labile γ-GP and to directly transfer the intermediate from one enzyme to the other (35). Vigna aconitifolia P5C synthetase is a fused protein with two separate catalytic domains, suggesting that the γ-GPR domain interacts with γ-GK, effecting the release of γ-GP, which exists in an enzyme-bound state. To study the influence of the γ-GK mutation on γ-GPR, we measured the γ-GPR activities in both strains. Table 2 shows that the mutant FH515 enzyme had greatly increased (approximately five- to sixfold increased) activity compared to the activity of the wild-type enzyme, even in the presence of l-proline. It was found that the S. cerevisiae γ-GPR was relatively insensitive to l-proline in a manner similar to that observed with γ-GK. On the other hand, the activity of P5C reductase, which converts P5C into l-proline, in the mutant was essentially equivalent to that in the wild-type strain (Table 2).

Expression of the mutated γ-GK in the put1-disrupted strain resulted in higher tolerance to freezing stress with l-proline accumulation.To further examine the effects of one amino acid substitution (Asp154Asn) in the γ-GK protein on the intracellular l-proline level and freeze tolerance in yeast, we constructed two centromere plasmids, one carrying the wild-type PRO1 gene and one carrying the mutated PRO1 gene (pRS-WTPRO1 and pRS-D154NPRO1, respectively), as described in Materials and Methods. These plasmids were introduced into the put1 pro1 disruptant (INVDput1pro1), and the growth phenotypes with AZC and the enzyme activities in the recombinant strains were examined. In agreement with the results obtained with mutant FH515, in strain INVDput1pro1 expressing the Asp154Asn mutant γ-GK AZC resistance was clearly evident (Fig. 2). Moreover, the activities of γ-GK and γ-GPR were apparently elevated, while the P5C reductase activity was virtually the same as that of the cells harboring the wild-type PRO1 gene (Table 2).

Table 3 shows the cellular proline levels and tolerance to freezing stress after 48 h of cultivation of the transformants in liquid SD medium. The wild-type (MB329-17C) and the mutant (FH515) strains were also cultivated as controls for l-proline accumulation and freeze tolerance. It was found that there was significant accumulation of l-proline in strain INVDput1pro1 expressing the Asp154Asn mutant γ-GK, as well as in FH515, whereas no intracellular l-proline was detected in strain INVDput1pro1 harboring the wild-type PRO1 gene and in strain MB329-17C. These results indicate that the elevated activities of γ-GK and γ-GPR, both of which are known to catalyze the first two steps of l-proline synthesis from l-glutamate, are important for increasing the level of l-proline in S. cerevisiae.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Intracellular l-proline contents before freezing and cell viabilities after freezing of the S. cerevisiae strains expressing wild-type and mutated γ-GK

Strain FH515 exhibited increased cell viability compared with that of strain MB329-17C when the cell suspensions were frozen at −20°C for 1 to 3 days (Table 3). Similarly, cells expressing the mutant γ-GK showed approximately 14- to 33-fold increases in survival rates after freezing compared with the survival rates of cells harboring the wild-type PRO1 gene (Table 3). Prolonged storage of the cells at −20°C for up to 1 week caused a gradual loss of freeze tolerance, although a significant cryoprotective effect was observed in the mutant γ-GK-expressing cells (data not shown). In addition, the amount of accumulated l-proline in the cells remained relatively stable after cultivation in all cases due to the lower level of l-proline metabolism caused by mutation and disruption of the proline oxidase gene. These results indicate that a point mutation in the PRO1 gene, which elevated the activities of both γ-GK and γ-GPR, resulted in a higher level of l-proline accumulation and freeze tolerance in S. cerevisiae.

DISCUSSION

An important issue for both basic research and applied biotechnology is the mechanism of cellular responses when cells are exposed to adverse environmental stresses, including freezing, desiccation, and high osmolarity. The best-characterized biochemical response of bacterial and plant cells to osmotic stress is the production and accumulation of osmoprotectants (compatible solutes), such as trehalose, glycerol, betaine, and l-proline (22, 43). Among such molecules, we focused on l-proline as a cryoprotectant, because it resulted in increased tolerance to freezing in yeast cells; this tolerance was nearly equivalent to that achieved with trehalose or glycerol, which are both known to be natural cryoprotectants for S. cerevisiae (38). l-Proline and trehalose were shown to preserve membrane structure and function during freezing in an in vitro study performed with isolated vesicles of the sarcoplasmic reticulum from lobster muscle (31). In addition, l-proline was found to enhance the stability of proteins and membranes in environments in which the water activity was low or the temperature was high (5) and to inhibit aggregation during protein refolding; these observations suggest the possibility that l-proline acts as a protein folding chaperone (33). Hence, l-proline has promising biotechnological potential as a protective agent for industrial microorganisms and enzymes.

To increase the intracellular l-proline concentration in yeast cells, we isolated toxic l-proline analogue-resistant mutants (38). In S. cerevisiae, two basic types of mutants have been observed. One type involves a dominant mutation directly linked to l-proline accumulation, which is due to enhancement of preexisting enzyme activities, as suggested here, or to up-regulation of the gene expression involved in l-proline biosynthesis. Overproduction of l-proline is believed to dilute AZC, which is incorporated into proteins competitively with l-proline (34). The other type of mutants involves a recessive mutation that does not increase the l-proline content compared to that of the parent, suggesting that a mutation may occur in the proline permease (19), Gap1p or Put4p, or in the membrane composition. As a new type of AZC resistance, we recently discovered on the chromosome of S. cerevisiae Σ1278b a novel gene, MPR1, which is involved in AZC resistance and encodes a unique acetyltransferase that detoxifies AZC by acetylating it (34, 40). It should be added that a high concentration of AZC (3 mg/ml) was used for the original mutant isolation procedure (38). This is because the parent strain, MB329-17C derived from a cross between S288C and Σ1278b, has the MPR1 gene.

Most organisms synthesize l-proline from either l-glutamate or l-ornithine (l-arginine); P5C, which is in nonenzymatic equilibrium with GSA, is a common intermediate in both of these pathways. Complementation tests between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes confirmed that diverse organisms have the same l-proline biosynthetic pathway (8, 10, 28, 41). Like biosynthesis of other amino acids, l-proline biosynthesis is strictly regulated. In bacteria and plant cells, feedback inhibition of γ-GK by l-proline has been shown to be the primary mechanism for control of l-proline biosynthesis (15, 35). Accordingly, removal of the feedback inhibition in bacteria and plants was found to increase l-proline accumulation and to protect the organisms from osmotic stress (7, 14, 17, 27, 36). P5C reductase, which converts P5C into l-proline, is unlikely to be the rate-limiting enzyme in l-proline biosynthesis in plants, because it has been shown that a high level of expression of the P5C reductase cDNA in tobacco does not alter the l-proline level in transgenic plants (37). Mammalian enzymes involved in l-proline synthesis possess characteristic properties; the short isoform of P5C synthetase is inhibited by l-ornithine, an intermediate in l-arginine synthesis, and P5C reductase is sensitive to inhibition by l-proline (16).

In S. cerevisiae, the γ-GK-encoding PRO1 and γ-GPR-encoding PRO2 genes are up-regulated at the transcriptional level by a general amino acid control system, while expression of the P5C reductase-encoding PRO3 gene is constitutive (1). However, it is not clear whether γ-GK or another enzyme activity is sensitive to feedback inhibition. Our results indicated that the S. cerevisiae γ-GK was less sensitive than the E. coli enzyme to l-proline inhibition (Table 2) and was not inhibited by 10 mM l-ornithine (data not shown). Interestingly, the Asp154Asn mutation in the γ-GK protein was found to enhance the activities of both γ-GK and γ-GPR (Table 2). The E. coli γ-GK and γ-GPR enzymes are believed to be synthesized as separate peptides and to form a heterodimer to function in vivo. In a previous report Tomenchok and Brandriss (41) also suggested that the yeast γ-GK can complex with the bacterial γ-GPR. In a mothbean P5C synthetase, which exhibits both γ-GK and γ-GPR activities, a leucine zipper sequence is present in each of the enzymatic domains. Leucine zippers may function intramolecularly to maintain the structure of the two domains of the Vigna P5C synthetase, and homodimer or heterodimer formation may occur through the zippers in order to allow close association between originally separate domains (15). Our results therefore suggest that position 154 in the yeast γ-GK protein may be important for formation of the γ-GK-γ-GPR complex and that replacement of Asp154 by Asn may facilitate an intermolecular interaction that stabilizes the complex. We also think that there is an alternative possibility, that altered γ-GK has an indirect effect on γ-GPR activity (e.g., through regulatory effects mediated via the γ-GK product). Furthermore, we have not addressed the clear relationship between the γ-GK-γ-GPR activity and the amount of l-proline. In S. cerevisiae, however, the PRO3 gene is known to be constitutively expressed (1), and the P5C reductase activity in mutant FH515 was essentially equivalent to that in the wild-type strain (Table 2). These results suggest that both γ-GK and γ-GPR are rate-limiting enzymes in yeast.

As shown in Table 3, there is strain-to-strain variability in freeze tolerance. It is probable that the genetic backgrounds of the S. cerevisiae strains used (S288C, Σ1278b, etc.) result in the differences in l-proline metabolism and in the l-proline contents of the cells. Our results could reflect the fact that the freeze tolerance of S. cerevisiae is influenced by some factors in addition to l-proline. Recent work has revealed that trehalose is a critical membrane-protecting agent and also confers increased cell viability under stress conditions (13). Accordingly, a combination of cryoprotectants, including trehalose, glycerol, and l-proline, could further contribute to enhancement of cellular stress resistance.

It is relatively difficult to breed industrial baker's yeast strains with a higher freeze tolerance than that of a laboratory strain. The process that involves adding l-proline externally to the cells or to the dough remains somewhat troublesome for practical applications. However, yeast strains with comparatively high levels of l-proline already in the cells might overcome this problem. It should be possible to create a freeze-tolerant baker's yeast diploid strain or an active dry yeast strain by combining expression of mutated γ-GK and disruption of the proline oxidase gene. An investigation along these lines is in progress.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank M. C. Brandriss, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, for providing yeast strains and S. Harashima, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, for the gift of a plasmid. The technical assistance of Y. Terao of our laboratory is greatly appreciated.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Fukui Prefectural Scientific Research Foundation to H.T.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 August 2002.
    • Accepted 8 October 2002.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Brandriss, M. C., and D. A. Falvey. 1992. Proline biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the PRO3 gene, which encodes Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. J. Bacteriol.174:3782-3788.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Brandriss, M. C., and B. Magasanik. 1979. Genetics and physiology of proline utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: enzyme induction by proline. J. Bacteriol.140:498-503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Carlson, M., and D. Botstein. 1982. Two differentially regulated mRNAs with different 5′ ends encode secreted and intracellular forms of yeast invertase. Cell28:145-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Csonka, L. N. 1981. Proline over-production results in enhanced osmotolerance in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Gen. Genet.182:82-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Csonka, L. N. 1989. Physical and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol. Rev.53:121-147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Csonka, L. N., S. B. Gelvin, B. W. Goodner, C. S. Orser, D. Siemieniak, and J. L. Slightom. 1988. Nucleotide sequence of a mutation in the proB gene of Escherichia coli that confers proline overproduction and enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress. Gene64:199-205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Dandekar, A. M., and S. L. Uratsu. 1988. A single base pair change in proline biosynthesis genes causes osmotic stress tolerance. J. Bacteriol.170:5943-5945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Delauney, A. J., and D. P. S. Verma. 1990. A soybean gene encoding Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase was isolated by functional complementation in Escherichia coli and is found to be osmoregulated. Mol. Gen. Genet.221:299-305.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Delauney, A. J., and D. P. S. Verma. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J.4:215-223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Dougherty, K. M., M. C. Brandriss, and D. Valle. 1992. Cloning human pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase cDNA by complementation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem.267:871-875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Hahn, Y. S., and H. Kawai. 1990. Isolation and characterization of freeze-tolerant yeasts from nature available for the frozen-dough method. Agric. Biol. Chem.54:829-831.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Hayzer, D. J., and T. Leisinger. 1980. The gene-enzyme relationships of proline synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol.118:287-293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Hino, A., H. Takano, and Y. Tanaka. 1987. New freeze-tolerant yeast for frozen dough preparations. Cereal Chem.64:269-275.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Hong, Z., K. Lakkineni, Z. Zhang, and D. P. S. Verma. 2000. Removal of feedback inhibition of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol.122:1129-1136.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Hu, C. A., A. J. Delauney, and D. P. S. Verma. 1992. A bifunctional enzyme (Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase) catalyzes the first two steps in proline biosynthesis in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89:9354-9358.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Hu, C. A., W.-W. Lin, C. Obie, and D. Valle. 1999. Molecular enzymology of mammalian Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase. Alternative splice donor utilization generates isoforms with different sensitivity ornithine inhibition. J. Biol. Chem.274:6754-6762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Kishor, P. B. K., Z. Hong, G.-H. Miao, C.-A. A. Hu, and D. P. S. Verma. 1995. Overexpression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol.108:1387-1394.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. 18.↵
    Kosuge, T., and T. Hoshino. 1998. Construction of a proline-producing mutant of the extremely thermophilic eubacterium Thermus thermophilus HB27. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64:4328-4332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Lasko, P. F., and M. C. Brandriss. 1981. Proline transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol.148:241-247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Li, W., and M. C. Brandriss. 1992. Proline biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: molecular analysis of PRO1 gene, which encodes γ-glutamyl kinase. J. Bacteriol.174:4148-4156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Matsutani, K., Y. Fukuda, K. Murata, A. Kumura, I. Nakamura, and N. Yajima. 1990. Physical and biochemical properties of freeze-tolerant mutants of a yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ferment. Bioeng.70:275-276.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    McCue, K. F., and A. D. Hanson. 1990. Drought and salt tolerance: towards understanding and application. Trends Biotechnol.8:358-362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Nakagawa, S., and H. Ouchi. 1994. Improvement of freeze tolerance of commercial baker's yeasts in dough by heat treatment before freezing. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.58:2077-2079.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Nakamori, S., S. Kobayashi, C. Kobayashi, and H. Takagi. 1998. Overproduction of l-cysteine and l-cystine by Escherichia coli strains with a genetically altered serine transferase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64:1607-1611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Oda, Y., K. Uno, and S. Ohta. 1986. Selection of yeasts for breadmaking by the frozen-dough method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.52:941-943.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Omori, K., S. Suzuki, Y. Imai, and S. Komatsubara. 1991. Analysis of the Serratia marcescens proBA operon and feedback control of proline biosynthesis. J. Gen. Microbiol.137:509-517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Omori, K., S. Suzuki, Y. Imai, and S. Komatsubara. 1992. Analysis of the mutant proBA operon from a proline-producing strain of Serratia marcescens. J. Gen. Microbiol.138:693-699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Orser, C. S., B. W. Goodner, M. Johnston, S. B. Gelvin, and L. N. Csonka. 1988. The Escherichia coli proB gene corrects the proline auxotrophy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae pro1 mutants. Mol. Gen. Genet.212:124-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Rose, M., and J. R. Broach. 1991. Cloning genes by complementation in yeast. Methods Enzymol.194:195-230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Rose, M. D., D. F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  31. 31.↵
    Rudolph, A. S., and J. H. Crowe. 1985. Membrane stabilization during freezing: the role of two natural cryoprotectants, trehalose and proline. Cryobiology22:367-377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  33. 33.↵
    Samuel, D., T. K. S. Kumar, G. Ganesh, G. Jayaraman, P.-W. Yang, M.-M. Chang, V. D. Trivedi, S.-L. Wang, K.-C. Hwang, D.-K. Chang, and C. Yu. 2000. Proline inhibits aggregation during protein refolding. Protein Sci.9:344-352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Shichiri, M., C. Hoshikawa, S. Nakamori, and H. Takagi. 2001. A novel acetyltranferase found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Σ1278b that detoxifies a proline analogue, azetidine-2-carboxylic acid. J. Biol. Chem.276:41998-42002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Smith, C. J., A. H. Deutch, and K. E. Rushlow. 1984. Purification and characteristics of a γ-glutamyl kinase involved in Escherichia coli proline biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol.157:545-551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Sugiura, M., and M. Kisumi. 1985. Proline-hyperproducing strains of Serratia marcescens: enhancement of proline analog-mediated growth inhibition by increasing osmotic stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.49:782-786.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Szoke, A., G.-H. Miao, Z. Hong, and D. P. S. Verma. 1992. Subcellular localization of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase in root/nodule and leaf of soybean. Plant Physiol.99:1642-1649.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Takagi, H., F. Iwamoto, and S. Nakamori. 1997. Isolation of freeze-tolerant laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from proline-analogue-resistant mutants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.47:405-411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Takagi, H., K. Sakai, K. Morida, and S. Nakamori. 2000. Proline accumulation by mutation or disruption of the proline oxidase gene improves resistance to freezing and desiccation stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.184:103-108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Takagi, H., M. Shichiri, M. Takemura, M. Mohri, and S. Nakamori. 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Σ1278b has novel genes of the N-acetyltransferase gene superfamily required for l-proline analogue resistance. J. Bacteriol.182:4249-4256.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Tomenchok, D. M., and M. C. Brandriss. 1987. Gene-enzyme relationship in the proline biosynthetic pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol.169:5364-5372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Wang, S.-S., and M. C. Brandriss. 1986. Proline utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of the cloned PUT1 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol.6:2638-2645.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Wohlfarth, K., J. Severin, and E. V. Galinski. 1990. The spectrum of compatible solutes in heterotrophic halophilic eubacteria of the family Halomonadaceae. J. Gen. Microbiol.136:705-712.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Yoshida, Y., T. Kiyosue, T. Katagiri, H. Ueda, T. Mizoguchi, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Wada, Y. Harada, and K. Shinozaki. 1995. Correlation between the induction of a gene for Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and the accumulation of proline in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Plant J.7:751-760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Yoshinaga, F., and S. Nakamori. 1983. Production of amino acids, p. 405-429. In K. M. Herrmann and R. L. Sommerville (ed.), Amino acids: biosynthesis and genetic regulation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London, United Kingdom.
  46. 46.↵
    Zhang, C.-S., Q. Liu, and D. P. S. Verma. 1995. Removal of feedback inhibition of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase, a bifunctional enzyme catalyzing the first two steps of proline biosynthesis in plants. J. Biol. Chem.270:20491-20496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
l-Proline Accumulation and Freeze Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Are Caused by a Mutation in the PRO1 Gene Encoding γ-Glutamyl Kinase
Yuko Morita, Shigeru Nakamori, Hiroshi Takagi
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 212-219; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.212-219.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
l-Proline Accumulation and Freeze Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Are Caused by a Mutation in the PRO1 Gene Encoding γ-Glutamyl Kinase
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
l-Proline Accumulation and Freeze Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Are Caused by a Mutation in the PRO1 Gene Encoding γ-Glutamyl Kinase
Yuko Morita, Shigeru Nakamori, Hiroshi Takagi
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2003, 69 (1) 212-219; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.212-219.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Amino Acid Substitution
Phosphotransferases (Carboxyl Group Acceptor)
Proline
Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336