Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public Health Microbiology

Direct Real-Time PCR Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal and Cecal Samples by Integrated Cell Concentration and DNA Purification

Knut Rudi, Hilde Kristin Høidal, Tone Katla, Birgit Klungseth Johansen, John Nordal, Kjetill S. Jakobsen
Knut Rudi
1MATFORSK, Norwegian Food Research Institute, 1430 Ås
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: knut.rudi@matforsk.no
Hilde Kristin Høidal
2Genpoint AS, 0884 Oslo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tone Katla
3Prior Norge AS, 0483 Oslo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birgit Klungseth Johansen
2Genpoint AS, 0884 Oslo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Nordal
3Prior Norge AS, 0483 Oslo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kjetill S. Jakobsen
2Genpoint AS, 0884 Oslo
4Division of Molecular Biology, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.790-797.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Schematic representation of the integrated cell concentration and DNA purification approach. (A) Bacteria bound to the beads. (B) Cells are disrupted, and DNA binds to the beads. (C) Situation after washing. The cell debris is removed, and pure DNA is associated with the beads. Finally, the DNA is detected either by qualitative gel electrophoresis (D) or by real-time quantitative detection (E). A dilution series of C. jejuni from 101 to 105 CFU/ml of bacterial binding buffer (Genpoint AS) is shown for both detection approaches. Cecal content samples were used for this example.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Evaluation of the cell concentration and DNA purification assay with five different C. jejuni strains. The bacteria were spiked directly in bacterial binding and washing buffer (Genpoint), with subsequent analysis by 5′-nuclease PCR. A 10-fold dilution series, from approximately 102 to 106 CFU/ml, is shown. The ΔCT value were obtained by subtracting the CT value for each dilution from the CT value obtained for the log signal for approximately 6 log10 CFU/ml. The following C. jejuni strains were analyzed: •, LCD 8617; ○, ATCC 43438; ×, ATCC 43436; *, ATCC 43439; and +, ATCC 43442. A linear regression curve is shown.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Effect of BSA as a PCR facilitator on cecal content samples. DNAs (2.5%) isolated from 12 mg of cecal samples were tested in 50-μl PCRs with the addition of different concentrations of BSA. Dilution series from 103 to 10 CFU/ml were used for this analysis. The products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination. mw, molecular weight marker; nt, nucleotides; neg, negative control.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    PCA of the comparison of methods. The data presented in Table 2 were subjected to PCA (see Materials and Methods for details). (A) Score diagram for the methods tested. (B) Loading for the different parameters tested. The two PCs (PC1 and -2) explain 50 and 38% of the variance in the data, respectively. AMPEFF, amplification efficiency; REGRESSCO, squared regression coefficient; DETECTLIM, detection limit; time, performance time; CENTRIFUG, centrifugation; PRIMDIMER, primer dimer; BUGSB, Bugs'n Beads; DNADIR, DNA DIRECT.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Quantification of C. jejuni in poultry flocks. The amount of C. jejuni was determined by real-time quantitative PCR. White bars represent fecal samples, while black bars represent cecal samples. Error bars represent standard deviations for all of the positive samples within a flock. The detection limit of the assay was 4 log10 CFU/g. nt, not tested.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Amount of fecal or cecal content tolerated in a 50-μl reaction without detectable PCR inhibition

    MatrixPurifi- cationaAmt of matrix (mg) in presence of facilitator
    No facilitator0.4% BSA4% PEG0.4% BSA and 4% PEG
    FecesPurified2.511510
    CecumPurified0.11<0.21
    FecesNone<0.50.5Not testedNot tested
    CecumNone<0.1<0.1Not testedNot tested
    • ↵ a Purified material was purified with the Bugs'n Beads kit from Genpoint.

  • TABLE 2.

    Comparison of sample preparation methods

    MethodAmplification efficiencySquare regression coefficient (S2) (%)Detection limitaPerformance timeCentrifugationPrimer dimersb
    Bugs'n Beads0.999.6>2-<2030 minNoNo
    DNeasy0.999.9>2-<204 hYesYes
    Prepman1.099.8>2-<2030 minYesYes
    DNA DIRECT0.799.2>20-<20045 minYesYes
    • ↵ a The detection limit is between the sample with the lowest CFU giving a signal and the next sample. The values are given relative to the CFU in the original sample.

    • ↵ b The level of primer dimer formation was determined by qualitative PCR.

  • TABLE 3.

    Camplylobacter detection in poultry flocks

    Flock no.Direct quantitative detectiona,bDirect qualitative detectiona,cEnrichment detectiona,cPresence of Campylo- bacterd
    FecesCecumFecesCecumFecesCecum
    1−−−−−−No
    2−−−−−−No
    3++++++++++++++++++Yes
    4++++++++++++++++++Yes
    5−−−−−−No
    6++++++++++++++++Yes
    7−−−−−−No
    8−−+++++++++Yese
    9++++++++++++++++Yes
    10−−−−−−No
    11+++++++++++++++++Yes
    12++++++++++++++++++Yes
    13+++++++++++++++++Yes
    14++++++++++++++++++Yes
    15+++NT+++NT+++NTYes
    16−−−−NTNTNo
    17−−++++++NTNTYese
    18−−−−NTNTNo
    19++++++++++++NTNTYes
    20++++++++++++NTNTYes
    21++++++++++++NTNTYes
    22+++++++++++NTNTYes
    23−−−−NTNTNo
    24++++++++++++NTNTYes
    25−−−−NTNTNo
    26++++++++++++NTNTYes
    27−−−−NTNTNo
    28−−−−NTNTNo
    29++++++++NTNTYes
    30−−NTNTNTNTNo
    31++++++NTNTNTNTYes
    • ↵ a Percentage of samples containing Campylobacter, as follows: −, 0; +, ≤50; ++, 50 to 100; +++, 100; NT, not tested.

    • ↵ b Detection of C. jejuni.

    • ↵ c Detection of Campylobacter spp.

    • ↵ d The flock was defined as Campylobacter positive if at least one of the samples gave a positive Campylobacter signal.

    • ↵ e Flock contains Campylobacter species other than C. jejuni.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Direct Real-Time PCR Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal and Cecal Samples by Integrated Cell Concentration and DNA Purification
Knut Rudi, Hilde Kristin Høidal, Tone Katla, Birgit Klungseth Johansen, John Nordal, Kjetill S. Jakobsen
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2004, 70 (2) 790-797; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.790-797.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct Real-Time PCR Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal and Cecal Samples by Integrated Cell Concentration and DNA Purification
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Direct Real-Time PCR Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal and Cecal Samples by Integrated Cell Concentration and DNA Purification
Knut Rudi, Hilde Kristin Høidal, Tone Katla, Birgit Klungseth Johansen, John Nordal, Kjetill S. Jakobsen
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2004, 70 (2) 790-797; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.790-797.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Campylobacter jejuni
cecum
chickens
feces
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336