Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Ecology

Ecophysiological Interaction between Nitrifying Bacteria and Heterotrophic Bacteria in Autotrophic Nitrifying Biofilms as Determined by Microautoradiography-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Tomonori Kindaichi, Tsukasa Ito, Satoshi Okabe
Tomonori Kindaichi
Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsukasa Ito
Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoshi Okabe
Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sokabe@eng.hokudai.ac.jp
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1641-1650.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Phylogenetic trees for α-, β-, and γ-Proteobacteria (A) and Nitrospira, Verrucomicrobia, GNSB, and the CFB group (B), showing the positions of the clones obtained from the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm. The tree was generated by using 1,309 bp (A) and 1,086 bp (B) of the 16S rRNA genes and the neighbor-joining method. Scale bar = 5% sequence divergence. The values at the nodes are bootstrap values (100× resampling analysis). The Methanobacterium congolense sequence served as the outgroup for rooting the tree. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the clones analyzed.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Confocal laser scanning microscope images showing the in situ spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria (AOB plus NOB) and heterotrophic bacteria in the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm. (A) FISH with TRITC-labeled probes Nso190 and Ntspa1026 (specific for AOB and Nitrospira, respectively) and FITC-labeled probe ALF1b (specific for α-Proteobacteria). (B) FISH with TRITC-labeled probes BET42a and Ntspa1026 (specific for β-Proteobacteria and Nitrospira, respectively) and FITC-labeled probe GAM42a (specific for γ-Proteobacteria). (C) FISH with TRITC-labeled probes Nso190 and Ntspa1026 (specific for AOB and Nitrospira, respectively) and FITC-labeled probes CF319a/b, S-*-CFB-0665-a-A-18, and S-*-CFB-0730-a-A-18 (specific for the CFB group). (D) FISH with TRITC-labeled probes Nso190 and Ntspa1026 (specific for AOB and Nitrospira, respectively) and FITC-labeled probes S-*-GNS-0667-a-A-18, GNSB-941, and CFX1223 (specific for GNSB). Bars = 10 μm. The surface of the biofilm cannot be seen in the photographs.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Microbial community composition for the autotrophic nitrifying biofilm as determined quantitatively by FISH. The number of cells that hybridized with a probe in each microscopic field was expressed as a percentage of the total surface area of the bacteria that hybridized with the EUB338 probe. Unidentified refers to the surface area of cells detectable with probe EUB338 but not with any other specific probe.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Combined MAR-FISH images of homogenized autotrophic nitrifying biofilm samples. (A) Uptake of [14C]bicarbonate by nitrifying bacteria when NH4+ was used as the sole electron donor. In situ hybridization was performed with FITC-labeled probe Ntspa1026 (green), which was used simultaneously with TRITC-labeled probe Nso190 (red). (B) Uptake of [14C]acetic acid by members of the γ-Proteobacteria group. In situ hybridization was performed with FITC-labeled probe EUB338 (green) and TRITC-labeled probe GAM42a (red). (C) Uptake of 14C-amino acids by the GNSB. In situ hybridization was performed with FITC-labeled probe EUB338 (green) and TRITC-labeled probes S-*-GNS-0667-a-A-18, GNSB-941, and CFX1223 (red). (D) Uptake of [14C]NAG by the GNSB. In situ hybridization was performed with FITC-labeled probe EUB338 (green) and TRITC-labeled probes S-*-GNS-0667-a-A-18, GNSB-941, and CFX1223 (red). Yellow signals resulted from binding of both FITC- and TRITC-labeled probes to one cell. Bars = 10 μm.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Patterns of substrate uptake by the major phylogenetic bacterial groups identified by using group-specific probes. (A) Fractions of group-specific-probe-hybridized cells that simultaneously took up radioactive substrates (MAR-positive cells), expressed as percentages of the total bacteria that were detected with probe EUB338 and simultaneously took up radioactive substrates. (B) Fractions of probe-hybridized and MAR-positive cells, expressed as percentages of each group-specific-probe-hybridized cell count. AOB, AOB that hybridized with probe Nso190; NOB, NOB that hybridized with probe Ntspa1026; α-Proteobacteria hybridized with probe ALF1b; γ-Proteobacteria hybridized with probe GAM42a; GNSB, GNSB that hybridized with probes S-*-GNS-0667-a-A-18, GNSB-941, and CFX1223; CFB, members of the CFB group that hybridized with probes CF319a/b, S-*-CFB-0665-a-A-18, and S-*-CFB-0730-a-A-18. The error bars indicate the standard errors (n = 10).

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Incubation conditions

    ExptaNonradioactive substrate(s)Radioactive substratesIncubation time (h)
    Ammonium concn (mM)Bicarbonate concn (mM)CompoundConcn (μM)
    11—bSodium [14C]bicarbonate864
    210.5[1-14C]acetic acid824
    310.5 l-Amino acid mixturec1004
    410.5[14C]NAG884
    • ↵ a Nonradioactive acetic acid, NAG, and amino acids were not added in all experiments.

    • ↵ b —, Nonradioactive bicarbonate was not added.

    • ↵ c The l-amino acid mixture was uniformly labeled with 14C.

  • TABLE 2.

    16S and 23S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes used

    ProbeaSequence (5′ to 3′)FA (%)bSpecificityReference
    EUB338GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT—cMost bacteria3
    BET42adGCCTTCCCACTTCGTTT35β-Proteobacteria23
    Nso190CGATCCCCTGCTTTTCTCC35eAmmonia oxidizers26
    GAM42afGCCTTCCCACATCGTTT35γ-Proteobacteria23
    ALF1bCGTTCGYTCTGAGCCAG20Many α-Proteobacteria, including Nitrospira23
    CF319 a/bTGGTCCGTRTCTCAGTAC35CFB, including OTU 724
    S-*-CFB-0655-a-A-18CGCTCACCTCCACAACAT20OTU 8 of CFBThis study
    S-*-CFB-0730-a-A-18TACAGKCTAGYAAGCTGC20OTU 9 of CFBThis study
    Ntspa1026AGCACGCTGGTATTGCTA20 Nitrospira moscoviensis 18
    GNSB-941AAACCACACGCTCCGCT35Phylum Chloroflexi (GNSB)11
    CFX1223CCATTGTAGCGTGTGTGTMG35Phylum Chloroflexi (GNSB)6
    S-*-GNS-0667-a-A-18CACCCSGAATTCCACRTT35OTU 11 and 12 of GNSBThis study
    S-*-Opitu-0744-a-A-18GCCTGAGCGTCAGCAATT5OTU 13 of VerrucomicrobiaThis study
    • ↵ a Probes designed in this study were named according to the recommendations of Alm et al. (1).

    • ↵ b FA, formamide concentration in the hybridization buffer.

    • ↵ c The probe can be used at any formamide concentration.

    • ↵ d Unlabeled probe GAM42a was used as a competitor to enhance specificity.

    • ↵ e Although the original description of the use of Nso190 indicated that 55% formamide should be used, we experimentally confirmed that 35% formamide was sufficient to discriminate ammonia-oxidizing β-proteobacteria in our autotrophic nitrifying biofilm, which is consistent with other studies in which Nso190 was used at much lower stringencies than that described originally (39).

    • ↵ f Unlabeled probe BET42a was used as a competitor to enhance specificity.

  • TABLE 3.

    Detection frequency and phylogenetic relatives of the clones analyzed

    OTUaNo. of clonesbGroupClosest taxonAccession no.
    1039 Nitrospirales, Nitrospira Nitrospira sp. Y14639
    114β-Proteobacteria, Nitrosomonas Nitrosomonas sp. strain R7c140 AF386753
    211β-Proteobacteria, Nitrosomonas Nitrosomonas europaea AF353160
    1111GNSBUncultured antarctic bacterium LB3-17 AF173820
    47γ-Proteobacteria, Xanthomonas Frateuria aurantia AJ010481
    94CFB groupUncultured bacterium PHOS-HE21 AF314419
    84CFB groupUncultured bacterium clone HP1B19 AF502210
    123GNSBUncultured sludge bacterium S9 AF234718
    32γ-Proteobacteria Lucina nassula gill symbiont X95229
    52α-ProteobacteriaUncultured sludge bacterium S43 AF234739
    61α-Proteobacteria, Hyphomonas Hyphomonas polymorpha AJ227813
    71CFB groupUncultured Cytophagales clone AF289153
    131 Verrucomicrobia, subdivision IV Opitutus sp. X99391
    • ↵ a Clones exhibiting 97% or greater similarity with each other were grouped into an OTU.

    • ↵ b A total of 100 clones in 13 OTUs were examined.

  • TABLE 4.

    Summary of patterns of uptake of radioactive substrates by phylogenetic groups

    GroupUptake of:
    BicarbonateAcetic acidAmino acidsNAG
    AOB+a−−−
    NOB+−−−
    α-Proteobacteria−++−
    γ-Proteobacteria−++−
    GNSB−−++
    CFB−−++
    Unidentified−+++
    • ↵ a +, MAR positive; −, MAR negative.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Ecophysiological Interaction between Nitrifying Bacteria and Heterotrophic Bacteria in Autotrophic Nitrifying Biofilms as Determined by Microautoradiography-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Tomonori Kindaichi, Tsukasa Ito, Satoshi Okabe
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2004, 70 (3) 1641-1650; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1641-1650.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ecophysiological Interaction between Nitrifying Bacteria and Heterotrophic Bacteria in Autotrophic Nitrifying Biofilms as Determined by Microautoradiography-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ecophysiological Interaction between Nitrifying Bacteria and Heterotrophic Bacteria in Autotrophic Nitrifying Biofilms as Determined by Microautoradiography-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Tomonori Kindaichi, Tsukasa Ito, Satoshi Okabe
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2004, 70 (3) 1641-1650; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1641-1650.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

biofilms
Proteobacteria

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336