Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public Health Microbiology

Chlorine Inactivation of Bacterial Bioterrorism Agents

Laura J. Rose, Eugene W. Rice, Bette Jensen, Ricardo Murga, Alicia Peterson, Rodney M. Donlan, Matthew J. Arduino
Laura J. Rose
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lrose@cdc.gov
Eugene W. Rice
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bette Jensen
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Murga
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia Peterson
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney M. Donlan
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Arduino
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.566-568.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Seven species of bacterial select agents were tested for susceptibility to free available chlorine (FAC). Under test conditions, the FAC routinely maintained in potable water would be sufficient to reduce six species by 2 orders of magnitude within 10 min. Water contaminated with spores of Bacillus anthracis spores would require further treatment.

The contamination of the U.S. mail system with anthrax spores in 2001 has heightened concern about the safety of other public services and utilities, including our water distribution systems. Currently, chlorination is the most common method of disinfecting drinking water in the United States (2, 3). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the water treatment industry use Ct values (“C” is the chlorine concentration in milligrams/liter, and “t” is the exposure time in minutes) to calculate microbial inactivation and to evaluate the effectiveness of a water treatment system. Ct tables have been developed for some waterborne pathogens to indicate conditions necessary for a 2-log10 (99%) or 3-log10 (99.9%) inactivation. The present study determined Ct values for 2-log and 3-log inactivation of seven species (11 isolates) on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) list of category A and B potential bioterrorism agents (12).

The bacterial strains Bacillus anthracis Ames, Brucella melitensis ATCC 23456, Brucella suis EAM562, Burkholderia mallei M-9, Burkholderia mallei M-13, Burkholderia pseudomallei ATCC 1688, Francisella tularensis LVS, Francisella tularensis NY98, Yersinia pestis A1122, and Yersinia pestis Harbin were obtained from CDC laboratories. B. anthracis Sterne 34F2 was obtained from Colorado Serum Co., Denver, Colo.

The effect of each chlorine concentration was tested in triplicate by using chlorine demand-free buffer (0.05 M KH2PO4; pH 7) and maintained at 5 and 25°C. Testing methods are described elsewhere (4). Free available chlorine (FAC) and total chlorine were monitored by using DPD colorimetric analysis (1).

Decay curves were generated for each organism by using the log10-transformed data of the mean CFU counts at each time, temperature, and chlorine concentration. Linear regressions of the appropriate segments of the decay curves were performed to estimate the time needed for a 99 or 99.9% reduction in viable counts. The Ct values were calculated by multiplying inactivation times for a given temperature and percent inactivation by the chlorine concentration at that time. The reported Ct values represent the mean of the Ct values calculated for each chlorine concentration.

The results of the chlorine challenge and the calculated Ct values are shown in Table 1 for the gram-negative bacteria and in Table 2 for Bacillus anthracis spores. Burkholderia, Brucella, and Yersinia strains were more susceptible to chlorine treatment than Francisella tularensis, as shown by Ct values ≤0.7 for a 3-log inactivation of these organisms. Ct values for a 3-log inactivation of Francisella tularensis ranged from 1.0 to 10.3. The slightly greater resistance of Francisella tularensis to chlorine was also observed by Foote et al. (6) as determined by injection into guinea pigs.

The Bacillus anthracis spores were less susceptible to chlorine disinfection than the gram-negative organisms. The Ames strain was slightly less susceptible to the chlorine than the Sterne strain, requiring more than 2 h for a 2-log reduction when exposed to 0.8 mg of FAC/liter at 25°C, whereas the Sterne strain underwent a >4-log reduction in counts after 2 h under similar conditions (Table 2). The Ct values determined in the present study for B. anthracis spores are comparable to the data obtained by Brazis et al. (5), from which Ct values can be calculated to be 458 at 4°C and 113 at 22°C for a 4-log reduction (99.99%). Differences between the Brazis findings and the results of the present study may be attributed to variability between strains, slight pH or temperature differences, or methods of spore preparation.

A 1992 survey of samples from 283 water utilities reported that of those that use chlorine, a median residual of ∼1.1 mg/liter, and a median contact time to the first point of use (from treatment facility to first access point in the water distribution system) of 45 min was reported in the utilities responding to the survey (13). Using the survey median result as a guide, we can estimate a median Ct value of 49.5 (1.1 mg/liter × 45 min) for the 283 water utilities surveyed. Our study shows that viable Burkholderia mallei, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis, Francisella tularensis, and Yersinia pestis would be reduced by more than 3 orders of magnitude under these median conditions if pH and temperatures were similar to those in the present study. The Bacillus anthracis spores, however, would not be inactivated by 2 log10 or 3 log10 under these median treatment conditions.

The Ct value can provide some indication of the efficacy of disinfectants on pathogenic organisms but must be determined for each species and at several temperatures and pH conditions. If the water temperature were lower or the pH were higher within a particular distribution system, the Ct values would be expected to be higher for all organisms than those calculated in the present study. Other factors that may promote survival of bacteria in chlorinated water include nutrient availability before exposure to FAC (9-11), attachment to surfaces (8), clumping and incorporation in organic materials (7), and incorporation into biofilms present in drinking water systems (9). Continued work to address the efficacy of FAC under various water conditions, as well as evaluation of other water treatment methods such as monochloramine, ozone, and UV light, is essential for protecting public health in the event of an intentional release of these bacterial agents into a potable water system.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Free chlorine inactivation of select agents at pH 7

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Free chlorine inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores at pH 7

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank May Chu, CDC, for providing the Francisella tularensis isolates; Tanja Popovic, CDC, for providing the Burkholderia and Brucella isolates; and Richard Meyer, CDC, for providing the Yersinia pestis isolates.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 20 April 2004.
    • Accepted 29 August 2004.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    American Public Health Association. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  2. 2.↵
    American Water Works Association Water Quality Division Disinfection Systems Committee. 2000. Committee report: disinfection at small systems. J. Am. Water Works Assoc.92:24-31.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    American Water Works Association Water Quality Division Disinfection Systems Committee. 2000. Committee report: disinfection at large and medium-sized systems. J. Am. Water Works Assoc.92:32-43.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Berman, D., and J. C. Hoff. 1984. Inactivation of simian rotavirus SA11 by chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and monochloramine. Appl. Microbiol.48:317-323.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Brazis, A. R., J. E. Leslie, P. W. Kabler, and R. L. Woodward. 1958. The inactivation of spores of Bacillus globigii and Bacillus anthracis by free available chlorine. Appl. Microbiol.6:338-342.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Foote, H. B., W. L. Jellison, E. A. Steinhaus, and G. M. Kohls. 1943. Effect of chlorination of Pasteurella tularensis in aqueous suspension. J. Am. Water Works Assoc.35:902-910.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    LeChevallier, M. W., T. M. Evans, and R. J. Seidler. 1981. Effect of turbidity on chlorination efficiency and bacterial persistence in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.42:159-167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    LeChevallier, M. W., T. S. Hasseneauer, A. K. Camper, and G. A. McFeters. 1984. Disinfection of bacteria attached to granular activated carbon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.48:918-923.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    LeChevallier, M. W., C. Cawthon, and R. G. Lee. 1988. Inactivation of biofilm bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.54:2492-2499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    LeDantec, C., J. P. Duget, A. Montiel, N. Dumoutier, S. Dubrou, and V. Vincent. 2002. Chlorine disinfection of atypical mycobacteria isolated from a water distribution system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68:1025-1032.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Lisle, J. T., S. C. Broadaway, A. M. Prescott, B. H. Pyle, C. Fricker, and G. A. McFeters. 1998. Effects of starvation on physiological activity and chlorine disinfection resistance in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64:4658-4662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Rotz, L. D., A. S. Kahn, S. R. Lillibridge, S. M. Ostroff, and J. M. Hughes. 2002. Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents. Emerg. Infect. Dis.8:225-230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Water Quality Division Disinfection Committee. 1992. Survey of water utility disinfection practices. J. Am. Water Works Assoc.84:121-128.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Chlorine Inactivation of Bacterial Bioterrorism Agents
Laura J. Rose, Eugene W. Rice, Bette Jensen, Ricardo Murga, Alicia Peterson, Rodney M. Donlan, Matthew J. Arduino
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2005, 71 (1) 566-568; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.566-568.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chlorine Inactivation of Bacterial Bioterrorism Agents
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Chlorine Inactivation of Bacterial Bioterrorism Agents
Laura J. Rose, Eugene W. Rice, Bette Jensen, Ricardo Murga, Alicia Peterson, Rodney M. Donlan, Matthew J. Arduino
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2005, 71 (1) 566-568; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.566-568.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus anthracis
Bioterrorism
chlorine
disinfectants
Gram-negative bacteria

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336