Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Ecology

Emergence of Competitive Dominant Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterial Populations in a Full-Scale Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant

Alice C. Layton, Hebe Dionisi, H.-W. Kuo, Kevin G. Robinson, Victoria M. Garrett, Arthur Meyers, Gary S. Sayler
Alice C. Layton
1Department of Microbiology
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hebe Dionisi
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-W. Kuo
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin G. Robinson
3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria M. Garrett
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur Meyers
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
4Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary S. Sayler
1Department of Microbiology
2Center of Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alayton@utk.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1105-1108.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Ammonia-oxidizing bacterial populations in an industrial wastewater treatment plant were investigated with amoA and 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR assays. Nitrosomonas nitrosa initially dominated, but over time RI-27-type ammonia oxidizers, also within the Nitrosomonas communis lineage, increased from below detection to codominance. This shift occurred even though nitrification remained constant.

Aerobic activated sludge systems are primarily designed to remove organic wastes (1). Conversion of ammonia to nitrate (nitrification) is a secondary function often exploited in municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to reduce the ammonia toxicity of the effluent. In contrast to municipal WWTPs, nitrogen (primarily ammonia) is added to the influent in some industrial WWTPs to balance the high organic carbon waste stream and provide nitrogen for heterotrophic growth. Therefore, conversion of ammonia to nitrite and then nitrate (nitrification) is undesirable because it reduces the amount of ammonia available for heterotrophic growth (assimilatory removal).

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are primarily responsible for the first step in nitrification and convert ammonia to nitrite. AOB found in WWTPs generally are nitrosomonads, which can be subdivided into lineages based on cultured representatives (12, 13). Some WWTPs may contain single AOB populations, whereas others contain multiple AOB populations (12). In a previous study, only one AOB population (Nitrosomonas nitrosa like) was detected by molecular methods in June of 2000 in the industrial WWTP investigated in this study (2). The goals of the present study were to monitor this AOB population in the WWTP by real-time PCR with TaqMan probes and demonstrate its persistence over time under normal plant operating conditions. The amoA gene was chosen as the target gene, as future conversion of the DNA-based assays to RNA-based assays using reverse transcriptase real-time PCR may lead to treatment performance indicators. Furthermore, within the nitrosomonad lineages, the amoA gene shows considerably more nucleotide variability between the cultured representatives than does the 16S rRNA gene. For example, the maximum 16S rRNA gene nucleotide difference within the N. communis lineage is around 5%, whereas the maximum amoA gene nucleotide difference between the same isolates is around 19% (12). Because of the higher nucleotide variability within the amoA gene, nucleotide assays targeting the amoA gene may allow more resolution between AOB populations in WWTPs than 16S rRNA-based assays. However, amoA-based assays may also miss more AOB populations than the 16S rRNA-based assays. Therefore, in this study measures of AOB presence other than just amoA-based assays, such as DNA sequencing and an AOB 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR assay, were used.

Mixed liquor samples were collected over a 13-month period (August 2000 to September 2001) from an industrial WWTP treating approximately 27 million gallons of wastewater daily, containing primarily organic acids, ethylene glycol, acetone, and alcohols (2). Both phosphorus in the form of phosphoric acid and nitrogen in the form of ammonia were added to the influent to maintain a nominal C/N ratio of 10:1 and a C/P ratio of 100:1, respectively. During the course of this investigation, the ammonia concentrations in the influent and effluent were 30 ± 12 and 1.1 ± 1.7 ppm, respectively (Fig. 1), resulting in a fairly constant ammonia removal efficiency of 96%.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Influent and effluent ammonia concentrations in the industrial WWTP over13 months.

Identification of AOB in the industrial WWTP was attempted by both culture and nonculture methods. Suspended solids from the WWTP of August 2001 were used to enrich AOB by performing serial dilutions in synthetic medium no. 3 (7) and plating these enrichments over nylon membranes in the same medium supplemented with 1.5% Noble agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.). Membranes were transferred to fresh plates every 7 days. After 8 to 12 weeks, individual brownish colonies approximately 1 to 2 mm in diameter growing on the membrane were obtained. Sequence analysis of the amoA gene from AOB colonies enriched from the WWTP indicated that this gene was closely related to Nitrosomonas sp. strain Nm148 amoA (99% similarity), which in turn is closely related to N. nitrosa, belonging to the N. communis lineage. Similarly, a portion of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer AOB 1149f (Table 1) and reverse primer 1492r (9) and cloned. Sequence analysis of this clonal library indicated that this was not a pure culture. Three sequences types were identified; one sequence type was 99% similar to Nitrosomonas sp. strain Nm 148 (accession no. AY123792 ), whereas the other sequence types were 98% similar to Stenotrophomonas (accession no. AF123092 ) and Oligotropha carboxidovorans (accession no. AB09960 ). Cultured members of the Nitrosomonas communis lineage have been isolated from various environments. N. nitrosa Nm90 was isolated from industrial sewage in Germany (6), whereas Nitrosomonas sp. strain Nm 148 was isolated from a hot spring in Greece (13).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Primers, probes, and protocols for real-time PCR assays for AOB developed in this study

N. nitrosa-type amoA genes were previously detected in the WWTP sampled in June 2000 and August 2000 (2). In order to determine whether amoA gene sequences other than those of the N. nitrosa type could be detected, two new amoA libraries (October 2001 and December 2001) were constructed with primers amoA-1F and amoA-2R (14). All of the amoA clones sequenced from the October 2001 library (10 clones) and 6 clones sequenced from the December 2001 library were 99 to 100% homologous to N. nitrosa amoA (National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI] accession number AJ238495 ) and to the amoA gene isolated from the ammonia-oxidizing colony. However, three clones from the December 2001 library were 99% similar to amoA genes from uncultured bacterial clone RI-27 (11) (NCBI accession number AF532311 ) and a clone from a phosphate- and nitrogen-removing biofilm (B3-6) (4). The nucleotide similarity between the amoA genes from the N. nitrosa clones and the RI-27-type amoA clones was 82%. In addition, the nucleotide sequence similarities between the RI-27-type amoA clones and the amoA genes from Nitrosomonas strains Nm33 and Nm41 were 85 and 83%, respectively, suggesting that the RI-27-type AOB population is also part of the N. communis cluster (12).

Real-time PCR assays were performed with 1× QIAGEN QuantiTect probe supermix (QIAGEN, Valencia, Calif.), 1 to 10 ng of biosludge total DNA, primers, and probes as summarized in Table 1. PCR amplification and detection of the fluorescent signal were performed with the DNA Engine Opticon continuous fluorescence detection system (MJ Research, Waltham, Mass.) under the thermocycler conditions listed in Table 1. Standard curves for each assay were constructed on the basis of serial 10-fold dilutions of plasmids containing cloned gene fragments of each target molecule and ranging from 5 × 107 to 50 copies per PCR. All PCR runs, standards, negative controls (no DNA), and biosludge samples were prepared in triplicate. For each gene assay, each sample was tested in at least two separate PCR runs.

The total bacterial population in mixed liquor samples was estimated with a real-time PCR assay previously designed to detect the 16S rRNA gene from most bacteria (5) and remained constant with a mean of 4.8 (± 2.0) × 1012 copies per liter (Fig. 2A). These values are consistent with the stable mixed liquor volatile suspended solid values measured at the WWTP (data not shown). Nitrospira 16S rRNA genes were also detected in mixed liquor samples with a previously designed real-time PCR assay (5) with a mean of 1.9 (± 1.1) × 1010 copies per liter (Fig. 2A).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Population dynamics in the activated sludge in an industrial WWTP as determined by real-time PCR assays. (A) Numbers of copies of total bacterial, nitrite-oxidizing bacterium Nitrospira, and β subdivision AOB 16S rRNA genes per liter of mixed liquor. The detection limits were determined on the basis of the lowest standard in gene copies routinely detected per PCR, which was 500 copies for the bacterial and AOB 16S rRNA gene assays and 50 copies for the Nitrospira 16S rRNA gene assay. After adjustment of the lowest number of standard copies detected for the amount of DNA recovered per milliliter of sample extracted, the DNA dilution, and the amount of DNA added per samp1e, the minimum number of gene copies per liter of mixed liquor would be 2 × 108, 2 × 107, and 2 × 108 for the total bacterial, Nitrospira, and AOB 16S rRNA gene assays, respectively. (B) Number of copies of amoA genes, N. nitrosa, and the RI-27 type AOB per liter of mixed liquor. The lowest number of standards routinely detected in both of the amoA gene assays was 50 copies per PCR or the equivalent of 2 × 107 gene copies per liter. Asterisks indicate that the number of RI-27-type amoA copies per liter was belowthe detection limit in two samples. (C) Number of cells of AOB per liter of mixed liquor determined from AOB 16S rRNA genes (panel A) assuming one copy per cell and number of amoA gene copies (panel B) assuming two copies per cell.

A real-time PCR assay was developed for the quantification of the AOB 16S rRNA genes on the basis of fluorescence in situ hybridization probe NSO 1225 (10) (Table 1). Three base pairs were added to both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the NSO 1225 probe to increase the melting temperature and make it more suitable for use as a TaqMan probe. Primers and probes for the assay were developed by following the guidelines provided by Applied Biosystems (http://home.appliedbiosytems.com ). Comparison of the primers and probe with AOB 16S rRNA gene sequences described in the recently published AOB phylogeny (13) suggests that the AOB 16S rRNA gene assay developed in this study would detect most of the nitrosomonad lineages, including Nitrosomonas oligotropha, N. communis, Nitrosomonas marina, and Nitrosomonas strain Nm143, as well as the Nitrosospira clusters. However, this assay probably would amplify neither members of the Nitrosomonas mobilis lineage nor half of the Nitrosomonas europaea lineage because of a total of three to five mismatches in the primers and probe. The application of the AOB 16S rRNA gene assay to this biological system demonstrated relatively stable concentrations of 1.37 (± 1.56) × 1011 AOB 16S rRNA genes per liter or 9.3 (± 8.9)% of the total bacterial population (Fig. 2A).

Separate real-time PCR assays were designed specifically for the N. nitrosa and RI-27-type amoA genes on the basis of DNA sequence alignments (Table 1). The primers and probes for both the N. nitrosa and RI-27 amoA assays were designed in the exact same locations in the amoA gene, but each primer and probe differed from the respective primer or probe in the other assay by 5 to 7 bp. The N. nitrosa amoA assay produced no fluorescent signals when tested with the RI-27 standards ranging from 5 × 107 to 50 copies, and the RI-27 amoA assay produced no fluorescent signals when tested with the N. nitrosa amoA standards ranging from 5 × 107 to 50 copies. This suggests that there was no cross-reactivity between the two amoA real-time PCR assays. A population change in the full-scale plant was initially identified by the approximately 100-fold decline observed in the number of N. nitrosa-type amoA copies per liter between January 2001 and July 2001 (3.8 × 1010 to 3.9 × 108) (Fig. 2B) and the considerably smaller 4-fold decline observed in the number of AOB 16S copies per liter (6.2 × 1010 versus 1.5 × 1010) during the same time period (Fig. 2A). The N. nitrosa-type organism was dominant during the first 6 months of the study, but its concentration slowly declined over this time period. Application of the RI-27 amoA-type gene assay to the same samples indicated that RI-27-type amoA increased from <2 × 107 copies per liter to become the dominant AOB in 4 months. In order to compare the number of AOB cells per liter in the WWTP determined by the amoA gene assays with the number of AOB cells determined by the AOB 16S rRNA assay, the results of the amoA gene assays for each sample were added and divided by 2, on the basis of the assumption of two amoA genes per cell and one 16S rRNA operon per AOB cell (5) (Fig. 2C). The number of AOB cells determined from the amoA genes and the number of AOB 16S rRNA genes were similar for all months of the 13-month period.

In summary, the combination of real-time PCR assays for the AOB16S rRNA gene and the amoA gene allowed the detection of a change in competitive dominance between a cultured representative (N. nitrosa) and an uncultured representative (RI-27 type) of AOB in the N. communis lineage, although traditional measurements of plant performance from a nitrification standpoint (e.g., ammonia removal efficiency) remained constant. The trends seen in this WWTP with regard to the AOB populations support, on a larger scale, the concept proposed by Fernández et al. (3) that a dynamic community can maintain a stable ecosystem function. Additional research into the different ecophysiologies of nitrifying bacteria (8) may provide insight into the nonmeasured factors that may cause large-scale competitive dominance shifts in WWTPs without exerting any macroscopic effects on the biotreatment process.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

All of the amoA gene sequences from the December 2001 library containing both RI-27-type amoA sequences and N. nitrosa-type amoA genes were deposited in the GenBank database and assigned NCBI accession numbers AY647454 to AY647455 and AY741507 to AY41513 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Water Environment Research Foundation (project 98-CTS-2) and the Waste Management and Research and Education Institute of the University of Tennessee (Knoxville). H.M.D. is a recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from CONICET (National Research Council, Argentina).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 June 2004.
    • Accepted 20 September 2004.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bitton, G. 1999. Wastewater microbiology, 2nd ed. Wiley-Liss, New York, N.Y.
  2. 2.↵
    Dionisi, H. M., A. C. Layton, G. Harms, I. R. Gregory, K. G. Robinson, and G. S. Sayler. 2002. Quantification of Nitrosomonas oligotropha-like ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and Nitrospira spp. from full-scale wastewater treatment plants by competitive PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68:245-253.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Fernández, A., S. Huang, S. Seston, J. Xing, R. Hickey, C. Criddle, and J. Tiedje. 1999. How stable is stable? Function versus community composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65:3697-3704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Gieseke, A., U. Purkhold, M. Wagner, R. Amann, and A. Schramm. 2001. Community structure and activity dynamics of nitrifying bacteria in a phosphate-removing biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67:1351-1362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Harms, G., A. C. Layton, H. M., Dionisi, I. R. Gregory, V. M. Garrett, S. A. Hawkins, K. G. Robinson, and G. S. Sayler. 2003. Real-time PCR quantification of nitrifying bacteria in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol.37:343-351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Koops, H.-P., B. Böttcher, U. C. Möller, A Pommerening-Röser, and G. Stehr. 1991. Classification of eight new species of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: Nitrosomonas communis sp. nov., Nitrosomonas ureae sp. nov., Nitrosomonas aestuarii sp. nov., Nitrosomonas marina sp. nov., Nitrosomonas nitrosa sp. nov., Nitrosomonas eutropha sp. nov., Nitrosomonas oligotropha sp. nov. and Nitrosomonas halophila sp. nov. J. Gen. Microbiol.137:1689-1699.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Koops, H.-P., and U. C. Möller. 1992. The lithotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, p. 2625-2637. In A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
  8. 8.↵
    Koops, H.-P., and A. Pommerening-Röser. 2001. Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.37:1-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Lane, D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115-148. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  10. 10.↵
    Mobarry, B. K., M. Wagner, V. Urbain, B. E. Rittman, and D. A. Stahl. 1996. Phylogenetic probes for analyzing abundance and spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:2156-2162.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Nogueira, R., L. F. Melo, U. Purkhold, S. Wuertz, and M. Wagner. 2002. Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Res.36:469-481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Purkhold, U., A. Pommerening-Röser, S. Juretschko, M. C. Schmid, H. Koops, and M. Wagner. 2000. Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular diversity surveys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:5368-5382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Purkhold, U., M. Wagner, G. Timmermann, A. Pommerening-Röser, and H.-P. Koops. 2003. 16S rRNA and amoA-based phylogeny of 12 novel beta-proteobacterial ammonia-oxidizing isolates: extension of the dataset and proposal of a new lineage within the nitrosomonads. Int. J. Sys. Evol. Microbiol.53:1485-1494.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Rotthauwe, J. H., K. P. Witzel, and W. Liesack. 1997. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63:4704-4712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Emergence of Competitive Dominant Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterial Populations in a Full-Scale Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant
Alice C. Layton, Hebe Dionisi, H.-W. Kuo, Kevin G. Robinson, Victoria M. Garrett, Arthur Meyers, Gary S. Sayler
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2005, 71 (2) 1105-1108; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1105-1108.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Emergence of Competitive Dominant Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterial Populations in a Full-Scale Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Emergence of Competitive Dominant Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterial Populations in a Full-Scale Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant
Alice C. Layton, Hebe Dionisi, H.-W. Kuo, Kevin G. Robinson, Victoria M. Garrett, Arthur Meyers, Gary S. Sayler
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2005, 71 (2) 1105-1108; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1105-1108.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

ammonia
Nitrosomonadaceae
sewage
Waste Disposal, Fluid

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336