Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Methods

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Variation within and between Steady States for Continuous Growth of the Hyperthermophile Thermotoga Maritima

Keith R. Shockley, Kevin L. Scott, Marybeth A. Pysz, Shannon B. Conners, Matthew R. Johnson, Clemente I. Montero, Russell D. Wolfinger, Robert M. Kelly
Keith R. Shockley
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin L. Scott
2SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27513
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marybeth A. Pysz
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon B. Conners
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew R. Johnson
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemente I. Montero
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell D. Wolfinger
2SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27513
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Kelly
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rmkelly@eos.ncsu.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5572-5576.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Maltose-limited, continuous growth of the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima at different temperatures and dilution rates (80°C/0.25 h−1, 80°C/0.17 h−1, and 85°C/0.25 h−1) showed that transcriptome-wide variation in gene expression within mechanical steady states was minimal compared to that between steady states, supporting the efficacy of chemostat-based approaches for functional genomics studies.

Continuous culture can be an effective tool for determining global transcriptional patterns in functional genomics studies (5). It may also be useful for examining the fluctuation in gene expression that arises within a specific environmental context or growth condition. It is not clear yet whether biovariability in gene expression in unperturbed cells impacts the interpretation of transcriptional response to intended perturbations. Thus, some of the variation between experimental conditions could reflect the variation within an experimental condition. This issue was examined by using a whole-genome cDNA microarray for Thermotoga maritima, an obligately anaerobic, hyperthermophilic, heterotrophic bacterium growing optimally at 80°C (2, 4, 8). Chemostat-based transcriptional response experiments with whole-genome cDNA microarrays were used to investigate sources of variance that contribute to the observed patterns of differential gene expression both within and between mechanical steady states (temperature and dilution rate) by using three common procedures used to assign differential gene expression.

Experimental overview.

A full-genome Thermotoga maritima DNA microarray constructed from PCR products (3) was used to measure transcriptional variation during continuous cultivation (6). Three mechanical steady states chosen to reflect perturbations within the normal growth range of the organism were examined: 80°C at a dilution rate of 0.25 h−1 (six samples taken at 103.7, 109.3, 127.7, 133.4, 151.8, and 157.5 h [19.4 generations]), 85°C at a dilution rate of 0.25 h−1 (four samples taken at 435.4, 459.6, 483.4, and 501.7 h [23.9 generations]), and 80°C at a dilution rate of 0.17 h−1 (three samples taken at 879.0, 958.5, and 1,000.0 h [29.7 generations]) (Fig. 1). Isolation of total RNA, hybridizations and washes were performed as described previously (9). Slides were scanned with a Scanarray 4000 scanner (Perkin Elmer, Fremont, CA) and the raw intensity data were processed as described previously (1). The hybridization scheme was arranged according to a loop design strategy, which allows statistically efficient comparisons between samples (11).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Growth of Thermotoga maritima in continuous culture. Six samples (at different time points) were taken at 80°C at a dilution rate of 0.25 h−1; four samples (at different time points) were taken at 85°C at a dilution rate of 0.25 h−1; and three samples (at different time points) were taken at 80°C at a dilution rate of 0.17 h−1. Sample points used in the study are indicated with the filled triangles. Optical densities of samples collected from the chemostat outflow were measured every hour for each steady state, and cell densities (squares) were determined by epifluorescent cell count enumeration. An attempt to stabilize the chemostat at a dilution rate of 0.25 h−1 and 90°C (the reported upper temperature limit of growth for T. maritima [2]), prior to shifting to a lower dilution rate (0.17 h−1) was made; however, washout occurred under these conditions. The solid line indicates temperature.

Simple “fold change” criteria and estimate-based probabilities.

Differential gene expression calls based on simple fold change criteria were evaluated by pairwise t tests derived from least-squares mean estimates from log2-transformed raw signal intensity data and mixed model analyses (1). The log2-transformed analysis is referred to as “unnormalized” because systematic global variation remained confounded with growth state effects; important sources of variation were taken into account through mixed model analyses. Over 36% of the open reading frames (ORFs) on the array were changed by the “twofold change rule” (Fig. 2A), but most of these simple fold change calls were not significant by statistical criteria. Even fold changes greater than 20-fold did not ensure that changes were statistically significant (Fig. 2B and C).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Gene expression calls for three different methods. (A) Shown is the distribution of simple fold change calls. Simple fold change was calculated by dividing the mean signal intensities from one sample by the mean signal intensities from a comparison sample, after balancing Cy3/Cy5 signal intensity channels across arrays. (B) Unnormalized log2-transformed significance measures are shown as a function of simple fold changes. (C) Mixed model significance versus simple fold changes. A total of 148,368 comparisons were made in the experiment. The dotted lines in panels B and C correspond to a Bonferroni corrected significance level (α) of 3.37 × 10−7, representing a conservative cutoff that bounds the experiment-wise false-positive error rate at 0.05. Statistical tests based on unnormalized estimate differences were in close agreement with simple fold change methods for fold changes greater than 10-fold (data not shown), but estimates resulting from mixed model analyses did not depend strongly on degree of fold change for any fold change threshold.

Selected discrepancies between methods are shown in Table 1. The effect of growth rate on transcription response has yet to be characterized in T. maritima, but comparison with a previous study describing the dynamic expression of temperature-inducible CIRCE-related genes (7) in the organism provided biological support for the utility of the mixed model procedure. Here, increased expression of the CIRCE-related genes were called more often using significance criteria from the mixed model approach than from the unnormalized method or twofold simple fold change cutoffs for growth at 85°C compared to growth at 80°C.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Selected discrepant genes up-regulated due to temperature or growth rate effectsa

Biological trends in expression based on mixed model analyses.

As visualized in the overall least-squares mean heat plot, expression of most ORFs within a steady state was relatively consistent over time (Fig. 3). Such consistency within and between growth conditions was expected, given the relatively mild levels of perturbation studied here. However, the mixed model approach led to a total of 386 differentially expressed ORFs (or about 20% of the 1,907 ORFs examined; the full set of differentially expressed genes will be published online at http://www.che.ncsu.edu/extremophiles/ ) in spite of the overall stability in expression (Fig. 4). Of this number, 102 transcripts were differentially regulated at the elevated temperature and 320 transcripts were significantly different at the reduced dilution rate (57 ORFs were modulated in response to both perturbations). Most ORFs differentially expressed between steady states (301/386 ORFs or about 88% of the final gene list) were not differentially expressed within a steady state, but those that were called indicate the need for multiple samplings within a treatment condition.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Hierarchical clusters constructed by using least-squares mean estimates. Harvest times (hours since reactor inoculation) and steady-state regions are indicated. Each row represents a different gene in the organism.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Summary of transcriptional responses within and between steady states. Significant findings (adjusted P, <0.05) are reported for global transcriptional responses within and between the mechanical steady states at 80°C (dilution rates of 0.25 h−1 and 0.17 h−1) and 85°C (dilution rate of 0.25 h−1). Differentially expressed ORFs within a given steady state for all three mechanical steady states are summed together and reported as “Steady State.” Significant ORFs in each pie chart are mutually exclusive to the stated category.

Experiments designed to study the influence of growth temperature on transcription in prokaryotes have usually been conducted in batch cultures, in which an increase in growth temperature leads to a corresponding increase in cell growth rate. However, the continuous culture presented a means to investigate the effects of temperature apart from growth rate considerations. While heat shock genes were induced in T. maritima at 85°C and 80°C (Table 1), about 75% of the ORFs with significant transcriptional differences due to growth temperature were down-regulated at the higher growth temperature. These included genes from most annotated prokaryotic clusters of functional categories of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs) (10). No COG functional categories were up-regulated due to growth at the higher temperature, but ORFs belonging to COG functional categories E (amino acid transport and metabolism), G (carbohydrate transport and metabolism), K (transcription), P (inorganic ion transport and metabolism), and M (cell envelope biogenesis and lipid metabolism) were down-regulated at the increased temperature. This downshift of major functional groups may indicate that at 85°C (5 degrees higher than the reported growth temperature optimum for this organism), T. maritima is devoting cellular resources to rescue and recovery efforts.

Transcriptional adjustments also arose from a change in the dilution rate. Among the ORFs showing the most significant changes were genes encoding a putative ammonium transporter, various ribosomal proteins, and enzymes involved in the processing of the growth substrate (maltose), which were all up-regulated at the lower dilution rate (Table 1). Nearly one-third of all the transcriptional differences due to dilution rate were ORFs encoding genes involved in the transport and metabolism of amino acids and carbohydrates.

In conclusion, repeated samplings of three different mechanical steady states demonstrated that transcriptional variation was remarkably constant in spite of possibly influential mechanisms operating within and upon the vessel. Thus, the key finding of this study is that continuous culture used with appropriate statistical models is an excellent tool for functional genomics investigations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by grants from the Department of Energy (Energy Biosciences Program) and the National Science Foundation (Biotechnology Program). K.R.S. was supported by a Department of Education GAANN Fellowship. S.B.C. was supported by a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences traineeship in Bioinformatics.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 December 2004.
    • Accepted 4 April 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Chhabra, S. R., K. R. Shockley, S. B. Conners, K. L. Scott, R. D. Wolfinger, and R. M. Kelly. 2003. Carbohydrate-induced differential gene expression patterns in the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. J. Biol. Chem.278:7540-7552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Huber, R., T. A. Langworthy, H. Konig, M. Thomm, C. R. Woese, U. B. Sleytr, and K. O. Stetter. 1986. Thermotoga maritima sp. nov. represent a new genus of unique extremely thermophilic eubacteria growing up to 90°C. Arch. Microbiol.144:324-333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Johnson, M. R., C. I. Montero, S. B. Conners, K. R. Shockley, S. L. Bridger, and R. M. Kelly. 2005. Population density-dependent regulation of exopolysaccharide formation in the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. Mol. Microbiol.55:664-674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Nelson, K. E., R. A. Clayton, S. R. Gill, M. L. Gwinn, R. J. Dodson, D. H. Haft, E. K. Hickey, J. D. Peterson, W. C. Nelson, K. A. Ketchum, L. McDonald, T. R. Utterback, J. A. Malek, K. D. Linher, M. M. Garrett, A. M. Stewart, M. D. Cotton, M. S. Pratt, C. A. Phillips, D. Richardson, J. Heidelberg, G. G. Sutton, R. D. Fleischmann, J. A. Eisen, C. M. Fraser, et al. 1999. Evidence for lateral gene transfer between archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature399:323-329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Piper, M. D., P. Daran-Lapujade, C. Bro, B. Regenberg, S. Knudsen, J. Nielsen, and J. T. Pronk. 2002. Reproducibility of oligonucleotide microarray transcriptome analyses. J. Biol. Chem.277:37001-37008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Pysz, M. A., K. D. Rinker, K. R. Shockley, and R. M. Kelly. 2001. Continuous cultivation of hyperthermophiles. Methods Enzymol.330:31-40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Pysz, M. A., D. E. Ward, K. R. Shockley, C. I. Montero, S. B. Conners, M. R. Johnson, and R. M. Kelly. 2004. Transcriptional analysis of dynamic heat-shock response by the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. Extremophiles8:209-217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Rinker, K. D., and R. M. Kelly. 2000. Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on growth dynamics and exopolysaccharide production for the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus litoralis and bacterium Thermotoga maritima. Biotechnol. Bioeng.69:537-547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Shockley, K. R., D. E. Ward, S. R. Chhabra, S. B. Conners, C. I. Montero, and R. M. Kelly. 2003. Heat shock response by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69:2365-2371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Tatusov, R. L., D. A. Natale, I. V. Garkavtsev, T. A. Tatusova, U. T. Shankavaram, B. S. Rao, B. Kiryutin, M. Y. Galperin, N. D. Fedorova, and E. V. Koonin. 2001. The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.29:22-28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Yang, Y. H., and T. Speed. 2002. Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments. Nat. Rev. Genet.3:579-588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Variation within and between Steady States for Continuous Growth of the Hyperthermophile Thermotoga Maritima
Keith R. Shockley, Kevin L. Scott, Marybeth A. Pysz, Shannon B. Conners, Matthew R. Johnson, Clemente I. Montero, Russell D. Wolfinger, Robert M. Kelly
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2005, 71 (9) 5572-5576; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5572-5576.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Variation within and between Steady States for Continuous Growth of the Hyperthermophile Thermotoga Maritima
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Variation within and between Steady States for Continuous Growth of the Hyperthermophile Thermotoga Maritima
Keith R. Shockley, Kevin L. Scott, Marybeth A. Pysz, Shannon B. Conners, Matthew R. Johnson, Clemente I. Montero, Russell D. Wolfinger, Robert M. Kelly
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2005, 71 (9) 5572-5576; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5572-5576.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Experimental overview.
    • Simple “fold change” criteria and estimate-based probabilities.
    • Biological trends in expression based on mixed model analyses.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Genome, Bacterial
Hot Temperature
Thermotoga maritima

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336