Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Invertebrate Microbiology

Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Bacterial Autoinducers

Elmus Beale, Guigen Li, Man-Wah Tan, Kendra P. Rumbaugh
Elmus Beale
1Departments of Cell Biology and Biochemistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guigen Li
3Department of Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79430
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Man-Wah Tan
4Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kendra P. Rumbaugh
2Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kendra.rumbaugh@ttuhsc.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00611-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses virulence factors controlled by quorum sensing (QS) to kill Caenorhabditis elegans. Here we show that C. elegans is attracted to the acylated homoserine lactones (AHSLs) that mediate QS in P. aeruginosa. Our data also indicate that C. elegans can distinguish AHSLs and may use them to mediate aversive or attractive learning.

Caenorhabditis elegans is a free-living terrestrial nematode that feeds on bacteria in its environment. Although little is known about how C. elegans finds food sources, it does possess a sophisticated chemosensory system that enables it to sense and respond to a wide range of chemicals (2). Recent data show that C. elegans uses odors produced by bacteria to identify food sources, although no specific odorants have been identified (16). Indeed, the identities of natural products that C. elegans senses and responds to remain unknown. In this study we examined whether C. elegans could sense the acylated homoserine lactone (AHSL) autoinducers produced by many gram-negative bacteria possessing quorum-sensing (QS) systems. Numerous bacterial functions have been attributed to AHSL signaling, including virulence factor production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13). Several recent studies suggest the AHSLs not only function in bacterial signaling but also are capable of modulating several signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells, a process we previously termed “interkingdom signaling”(13).

While Pseudomonas species can serve as food for C. elegans, some species are also pathogens (1). Utilizing standard chemotaxis assays, we compared the attraction of C. elegans to AHSL-producing (PAO1) and non-AHSL-producing (PAO1-JP2) (10) strains of P. aeruginosa. The PAO1-JP2 strain has deletions in the lasI and rhlI autoinducer synthase genes and is defective in autoinducer production and the production of QS-controlled exoproducts (10). In these assays C. elegans migrates toward one of two bacterial lawns on opposite sides of an agar plate as described previously (2). Briefly, 50-μl volumes of PAO1 and PAO1-JP2 overnight growth were spotted on chemotaxis plates (nematode growth medium lacking cholesterol) 6 cm apart and were grown at 37°C for 24 h. Fifteen minutes prior to the assay, 1 μl of 1 M NaN3 was applied to the centers of the bacterial lawns to anesthetize any worms that reached the spot during the experiment. Approximately 200 well-fed adult C. elegans wild-type strain Bristol N2 worms were rinsed in M9 medium, placed equidistantly between the two bacterial lawns, and allowed to undergo chemotaxis for 1 h. The worms were then counted using a dissecting microscope, and the chemotaxis index (CI) was determined for each plate. The CI is defined as the number of worms within a 2-cm radius of the test spot (in this case the PAO1 lawn) minus the number of worms within a 2-cm radius of a control spot (PAO1-JP2 lawn), divided by the total number of worms on the plate. (Note: the CI range is from −1 to +1, with 0 being neutral, +1 being a perfect attractant, and −1 being a perfect repellant). C. elegans worms migrated towards the PAO1 lawn approximately 40% more often than towards the PAO1-JP2 lawn (CI = 0.23 ± 0.08, P = 0.003, Student's t test; nine assays). This indicates that C. elegans was either attracted to an odorant made by PAO1 but not by PAO1-JP2 or repelled by an odorant made by PAO1-JP2 but not by PAO1. To examine the second possibility, chemotaxis assays were performed in which worms were given the food choices of PAO1 versus OP50 or PAO1-JP2 versus OP50. Escherichia coli OP50 is a standard bacterial food source for C. elegans and is used to maintain worm strains in the laboratory. We reasoned that if PAO1-JP2 possessed a repellant that PAO1 did not, we would detect a difference in the CIs between the two food choices. That worms preferred OP50 over both PAO1 and PAO-JP2, with identical CIs (CI = 0.32 ± 0.04 and 0.32 ± 0.05, respectively; n = 5), suggests that worms are not more repelled by PAO1-JP2 than by PAO1. We thus proceeded with the assumption that PAO1 possesses an attractant that is absent from PAO1-JP2.

Attraction to autoinducers.

As there are several bacterial products other than AHSLs that are generated by PAO1 but not PAO1-JP2, we next tested whether C. elegans was attracted to pure synthetic AHSLs (synthesized in our laboratory as previously described [4]). Four different AHSLs were tested, including two that are naturally synthesized by P. aeruginosa (3O-C12-HSL and C4-HSL), one synthesized by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (3O-C8-HSL) and C12-HSL, an analog of 3O-C12-HSL, that is significantly less active in bacteria (Fig. 1). For these assays, 10 μM of autoinducer was spotted on a test spot 6 cm away from a control spot. In standard P. aeruginosa cultures, 3O-C12-HSL concentrations have been measured in the range of 2 to 10 μM (9, 14). However, concentrations of up to 600 μM have been measured within P. aeruginosa biofilms (3). Therefore, we reasoned that concentrations of 10 μM and higher would be expected in P. aeruginosa biofilms in nature. Autoinducers were solubilized in 30 μl of 95% ethanol, which is a known neutral solvent for C. elegans (2). Thirty microliters of 95% ethanol was also placed on control spots. NaN3 was placed on test and control spots 15 min before the assay began. Positive control plates had 5 μl of ethyl acetate (a known strong attractant) on the test spots. Negative control (or vehicle) plates had 95% ethanol on both the test and the control spots. Chemotaxis towards 3O-C12-HSL, 3O-C8-HSL, and C4-HSL was significantly greater than that towards vehicle alone, with the CI for each approaching that for ethyl acetate, a potent attractant for C. elegans (P < 0.0001, analysis of variance with Scheffe's post hoc test; 12 assays) (Fig. 1). The CI for the analog C12-HSL, although elevated, was not significantly greater than that for the vehicle (P = 0.06, Student's t test; 12 assays).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

C. elegans worms are attracted to AHSLs. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean (SEM); n = 12; **, P < 0.0001 (analysis of variance with Scheffe's post hoc test).

Autoinducer-mediated aversive learning.

The ability of P. aeruginosa to kill C. elegans is under QS control (7, 15). Recent data show that after a short exposure to P. aeruginosa, C. elegans learns to avoid it when subsequently exposed (16). This aversive learning was odor mediated (16). We thus examined whether C. elegans could learn to avoid P. aeruginosa autoinducers after exposure to a pathogenic P. aeruginosa strain. P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 kills C. elegans via a QS-controlled cyanide (6). Lethal cyanide paralysis by PAO1 begins by 1.5 h after exposure. By 2 h, 30 to 40% of worms are paralyzed, and by 3 h, 100% are paralyzed (6). For our experiments, C. elegans worms were placed on lawns of PAO1 or PAO1-JP2 for 1 h. They were then removed prior to paralysis and placed on 3O-C12-HSL chemotaxis plates as described above (Fig. 2A). Strikingly, and in comparison to naïve worms, worms preexposed to PAO1 were repelled by 3O-C12-HSL (CI = −0.24 ± 0.04, P < 0.001, Student's t test; 10 assays). However, worms preexposed to the QS mutant PAO1-JP2 were still attracted to 3O-C12-HSL (CI = 0.16 ± 0.06; nine assays).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

(A). C. elegans worms are repelled by 3O-C12-HSL after exposure to PAO1 but not PAO1-JP2. (B). Autoinducer avoidance after PAO1 exposure is long lasting. Error bars indicate SEM; n = 10; *, P < 0.001 (Student's t test).

C. elegans can learn to avoid tastes, odors, and temperatures by positive and/or negative conditioning (11), and this memory can be either short-term (minutes) or long-term (hours to days) (12). We investigated how long avoidance of autoinducer lasted after exposure to PAO1. In these experiments, worms were fed on lawns of PAO1 for 1 h as described above. Worms were then deprived of food for 4 or 8 h prior to being placed on 3O-C12-HSL chemotaxis plates as described above. After 4 h of fasting, worms still avoided 3O-C12-HSL similarly to worms that had not been deprived of food (CI = −0.24 ± 0.04, P = 0.7, Student's t test; 11 assays) (Fig. 2B). After 8 h of fasting, although the avoidance behavior was diminished compared to that after no fasting, it was still detectable (CI = −0.07 ± 0.05, P = 0.06, Student's t test; 10 assays). Fasting alone did not result in 3O-C12-HSL avoidance (data not shown). Taken together, these data show that C. elegans can learn to avoid autoinducers and that this avoidance appears to be relatively long lasting.

Autoinducer-mediated positive conditioning.

As C. elegans can make a negative association with autoinducers following exposure to pathogenic P. aeruginosa, we wanted to determine if a positive association could also be made. For these experiments, worms were allowed to feed on lawns of OP50 to which either autoinducer or vehicle had been added. As attractive learning has been shown to require longer conditioning times (16), Bristol N2 worms were allowed to feed for 4 h, were fasted for 2 h, and then were removed and placed on 3O-C12-HSL chemotaxis plates as described above. Worms that fed on OP50 plus autoinducer were subsequently more attracted to 3O-C12-HSL than those that fed on OP50 plus vehicle (CI = 0.22 ± 0.03 and 0.13 ± 0.02, respectively, P = 0.045, Student's t test; 10 assays). Therefore, C. elegans displays both attractive and aversive learning to autoinducers.

Olfactory learning.

Serotonin-mediated signal transduction has been implicated in olfactory learning in C. elegans (8, 16). MOD-1 is a serotonin-gated chloride channel expressed in sensory neurons. Zhang et al. recently demonstrated that C. elegans mod-1 mutant worms were defective in aversive olfactory learning after exposure to pathogenic bacteria (16). As aversive learning requires serotonin from ADF neurons and the MOD-1 serotonin receptor, we examined whether naïve or PAO1-conditioned mod-1 mutant worms were attracted to P. aeruginosa 3O-C12-HSL by utilizing chemotaxis assays as described above (Fig. 3). Naïve and PAO1-conditioned mod-1 mutant worms were attracted to 3O-C12-HSL, indicating that defects in serotonin-mediated signaling disrupt aversive olfactory learning to autoinducer. In addition, the Toll-interleukin 1 protein is also involved in odorant receptor expression in C. elegans AWB neurons (5). However, we determined that attraction to autoinducers is not defective in tol-1 mutants (data not shown).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

mod-1 mutant worms are attracted to 3O-C12-HSL but do not display aversive learning after PAO1 exposure. Error bars indicate SEM; n = 10; *, P = 0.02 (Student's t test).

Concluding remarks.

In summary, C. elegans encounters many strains of bacteria in its natural soil environment. The ability to find good food sources over potential pathogens is a significant advantage. C. elegans uses a sophisticated chemosensory system to identify food and olfactory learning as a mechanism to avoid pathogens. This conditioning behavior is analogous to mammalian taste aversion. While there are many odorants produced by bacteria that C. elegans may detect and/or learn to avoid, we show here that one type of bacterial chemical, AHSL autoinducers, can mediate aversive and attractive learning.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Beatrice Velez and Brandy Harvey for help in optimizing assay conditions. Nematodes used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR).

M.-W.T. is funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. K.P.R. is funded in part by the American Lung Association (ALA).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 March 2006.
    • Accepted 25 April 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Alegado, R. A., M. C. Campbell, W. C. Chen, S. S. Slutz, and M. W. Tan. 2003. Characterization of mediators of microbial virulence and innate immunity using the Caenorhabditis elegans host-pathogen model. Cell. Microbiol.5:435-444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bargmann, C. I., E. Hartwieg, and H. R. Horvitz. 1993. Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell74:515-527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Charlton, T. S., R. de Nys, A. Netting, N. Kumar, M. Hentzer, M. Givskov, and S. Kjelleberg. 2000. A novel and sensitive method for the quantification of N-3-oxoacyl homoserine lactones using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: application to a model bacterial biofilm. Environ. Microbiol.2:530-541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Chhabra, S. R., C. Harty, D. S. Hooi, M. Daykin, P. Williams, G. Telford, D. I. Pritchard, and B. W. Bycroft. 2003. Synthetic analogues of the bacterial signal (quorum sensing) molecule N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone as immune modulators. J. Med. Chem.46:97-104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Chuang, C. F., and C. I. Bargmann. 2005. A Toll-interleukin 1 repeat protein at the synapse specifies asymmetric odorant receptor expression via ASK1 MAPKKK signaling. Genes Dev.19:270-281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Darby, C., C. L. Cosma, J. H. Thomas, and C. Manoil. 1999. Lethal paralysis of Caenorhabditis elegans by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:15202-15207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Gallagher, L. A., and C. Manoil. 2001. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 kills Caenorhabditis elegans by cyanide poisoning. J. Bacteriol.183:6207-6214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Nuttley, W. M., K. P. Atkinson-Leadbeater, and D. Van Der Kooy. 2002. Serotonin mediates food-odor associative learning in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:12449-12454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Pearson, J. P., K. M. Gray, L. Passador, K. D. Tucker, A. Eberhard, B. H. Iglewski, and E. P. Greenberg. 1994. Structure of the autoinducer required for expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:197-201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Pearson, J. P., E. C. Pesci, and B. H. Iglewski. 1997. Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J. Bacteriol.179:5756-5767.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Rankin, C. H. 2004. Invertebrate learning: what can't a worm learn? Curr. Biol.14:R617-R618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Rose, J. K., and C. H. Rankin. 2001. Analyses of habituation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Learn. Mem.8:63-69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Shiner, E. K., K. P. Rumbaugh, and S. C. Williams. 2005. Interkingdom signaling: deciphering the language of acyl homoserine lactones. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.29:935-947.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Smith, R. S., E. R. Fedyk, T. A. Springer, N. Mukaida, B. H. Iglewski, and R. P. Phipps. 2001. IL-8 production in human lung fibroblasts and epithelial cells activated by the Pseudomonas autoinducer N-3-oxododecanoyl homoserine lactone is transcriptionally regulated by NF-kappa B and activator protein-2. J. Immunol.167:366-374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Tan, M. W., L. G. Rahme, J. A. Sternberg, R. G. Tompkins, and F. M. Ausubel. 1999. Pseudomonas aeruginosa killing of Caenorhabditis elegans used to identify P. aeruginosa virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:2408-2413.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Zhang, Y., H. Lu, and C. I. Bargmann. 2005. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature438:179-184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Bacterial Autoinducers
Elmus Beale, Guigen Li, Man-Wah Tan, Kendra P. Rumbaugh
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2006, 72 (7) 5135-5137; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00611-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Bacterial Autoinducers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Bacterial Autoinducers
Elmus Beale, Guigen Li, Man-Wah Tan, Kendra P. Rumbaugh
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2006, 72 (7) 5135-5137; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00611-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Attraction to autoinducers.
    • Autoinducer-mediated aversive learning.
    • Autoinducer-mediated positive conditioning.
    • Olfactory learning.
    • Concluding remarks.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

4-Butyrolactone
Caenorhabditis elegans
chemotaxis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
signal transduction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336