Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Genetics and Molecular Biology

Random Insertion of a TetR-Inducing Peptide Tag into Escherichia coli Proteins Allows Analysis of Protein Levels by Induction of Reporter Gene Expression

Maximilian Schlicht, Christian Berens, Janko Daam, Wolfgang Hillen
Maximilian Schlicht
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Berens
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janko Daam
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Hillen
Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: whillen@biologie.uni-erlangen.de
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00739-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The insertion element InsTipα was constructed to generate protein expression data. It randomly fuses the TetR-inducing peptide Tip to the affected reading frame. Fusion protein expression is quantified by Tet-regulated reporter gene expression. The expression patterns of tagged Escherichia coli genes fully agree with published data from transcriptional fusions or microarrays, validating the Tip tag approach.

Proteome expression profiles provide important information but are cumbersome to obtain as the data are usually collected by two-dimensional electrophoresis (9, 25). When genome sequences are available, proteome-wide sequence-directed tagging approaches are an alternative (7, 13, 33). If directed tagging is not possible, random transposon-mediated tagging approaches are employed to fuse large reporter genes like lacZ to reading frames. The expression of these large reporter fusions is indicative of the amount of originally encoded protein expressed under the particular experimental conditions (21, 28). However, large fusion proteins may exhibit different properties than the untagged proteins, e.g., by affecting their solubility (19) or localization through steric hindrance (13). We describe here an approach to obtain a genetic readout of proteomic information by creating fusions with a short hexadecapeptide, called Tip (transcription-inducing peptide), that induces Tet repressor (16). For that purpose we constructed an insertion element, called InsTipα, to generate transposome-mediated random (12) in-frame translational fusions with Tip in Escherichia coli. We demonstrate here that this element can be used to determine the expression characteristics of proteins in five such fusion mutants.

Construction and function of InsTipα in E. coli.

We assembled the 1,816-bp-long insertion element InsTipα (Fig. 1A) from previously published vectors and oligonucleotides, amplified it by PCR, and cloned it into the PvuII-digested vector pWH1866 (17) (see Table 1 for a list of all bacterial strains, plasmids, and phages) to obtain pWH1912. (Construction details and sequences of all plasmids generated in this study are available upon request.) InsTipα is flanked by 19-bp-long mosaic elements (ME) (26), the binding sites of the hyperactive transposase Tn5 (8). The leftward end of InsTipα (Fig. 1A) contains a sequence designed to fuse a tag, termed InsTip1, to any protein encoded at the insertion site. An open reading frame spans the ME encoding 7 amino acids, followed by a sequence encoding a 7-amino-acid linker and the 16-residue Tip element terminated by an ochre stop codon. The insertion element also contains aphAIII, which confers kanamycin resistance in gram-negative and -positive bacteria (10), flanked by two Flp recombinase target sites to allow excision of the antibiotic resistance gene (4), thereby minimizing genomic interference.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

InsTipα architecture, in vivo screen, and in vivo activity. (A) Architecture of the insertion element InsTipα. Triangles represent the ME for transposase binding, the white box indicates the linker element, and the gray box encodes Tip. The ochre stop codon is symbolized by “S.” The white and black arrows represent the kanamycin resistance gene (aphAIII) and its promoter, and a lollipop represents the bidirectional transcriptional terminator from Tn10 (30). The resistance cassette is flanked by two Flp recombinase target sites (FRT) drawn as black arrows. The amino acid sequence encoded by the mosaic element at the leftward 5′ end, the linker, and tip is shown in single-letter abbreviations above the nucleotide sequence that is displayed in white type on a black background. The stop codon is marked by an asterisk. (B and C) In vivo screening system for TetR-inducing InsTip1 fusions. (B) Screening was carried out with E. coli WH207(λtet50) containing a chromosomally encoded tetA-lacZ transcriptional fusion. TetR (gray ovals) binds tetO and represses lacZ. (C) Integration of the insertion element InsTipα into an expressed open reading frame (geneX) results in a GeneX-InsTip1 fusion protein (light gray oval with X). Induction of TetR by this fusion protein is indicated by β-Gal activity. (D) In vivo activity of the TrxA-InsTip1 fusion. The leftmost pair of bars shows the repressed (white) and tetracycline-induced (gray) β-Gal activities. The next seven bars show the activities of the TrxA-Tip fusion control without (white) and with IPTG at the indicated concentrations (black; 15, 30, 60, 125, 250, and 500 μM). The right group of bars shows the β-Gal activities obtained with the TrxA-InsTip1 fusion under the same conditions. The y axis displays the β-Gal activities in Miller units (MU) (23). (E) Western blot of 10 μg of crude cell lysates separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed with an anti-thioredoxin A monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and phage used in this study

To determine if InsTipα insertion into an open reading frame can generate a protein fusion that induces TetR, InsTipα was fused to TrxA of E. coli, which had previously been used to express and characterize Tip (16). The constructed plasmid, pWH1909, expressing TrxA-InsTip1 under Ptac control, and the plasmid pWH1911, expressing TetR constitutively at a low level, were cotransformed into E. coli WH207(λtet50) (35). The addition of IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) to the resulting strain leads to expression of the InsTip1 fusion protein, and subsequent induction of TetR should relieve repression of lacZ (Fig. 1C). We titrated the strain with IPTG concentrations of 15 to 500 μM to express increasing amounts of TrxA-InsTip1 (Fig. 1D). Plasmid pWH2101 expressing TrxA-Tip was cotransformed instead of pWH1909 to provide a positive control for induction (16). A plateau of β-galactosidase (β-Gal) activity was obtained for concentrations above 60 μM of IPTG with both constructs (Fig. 1D). Western blot analyses carried out simultaneously demonstrated nearly identical expression levels of the fusion proteins TrxA-Tip and TrxA-InsTip1 (Fig. 1E). Thus, neither the length nor the primary structure of the peptide segment encoded by the ME and linker affects the TetR-inducing properties of Tip.

Purified hyperactive transposase and PvuII-restricted, gel-purified InsTipα DNA were incubated to form transposomes (2) and electroporated (8) into E. coli WH207(λtet50)/pWH1911, resulting in 6,400 kanamycin-resistant candidates on MacConkey agar plates. After 36 h of incubation at 37°C, 5 colonies displayed a yellow color indicating induction of TetR. Chromosomal DNA from the five strains was prepared and sequenced to determine their InsTipα integration sites (2). The diverse sequences obtained at the InsTipα integration loci agree in indicating its random insertion (12). Table 2 lists the strains obtained and the genes with their respective InsTipα insertion sites (see also Fig. 2), together with information about the function and subcellular localization of the affected proteins.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

InsTipα insertion sites and expression of the resulting InsTip1 fusion proteins. (A to E) Results for the five strains with InsTipα insertions in (A) atpD, (B) ppiD, (C) yraI, (D) yicO, and (E) yfdX. Top panels, schematic depiction of the insertion site and orientation of InsTipα into each target gene. The respective gene is represented by a black arrow and its designation, and its total length is indicated in bp. InsTipα is drawn schematically above the open reading frame, and its insertion site is indicated by a dotted line with the exact position of the nucleotide preceding the inserted sequence. Bottom panels, growth curves (filled squares) and β-Gal activities (filled bars) of WH207(λtet50)/pWH1911 and the respective candidate strains (open squares and open bars) grown at 37°C in MacConkey medium without indicator. Growth is expressed by the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) on the left y axis. The right y axis displays the β-Gal activities in Miller units (MU) (23). Each value was determined in triplicate, and the standard deviations are shown (error bars).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Annotation of InsTipα insertion strains

Determining fusion protein expression by InsTip1-induced β-Gal expression.

We first examined the growth curves of the five candidates and their parent strain WH207(λtet50)/pWH1911 at 37°C in MacConkey medium lacking the indicator bromocresol purple (Fig. 2A to E). The growth rates of all strains were identical (Fig. 2B to E), except that for WH851, which was clearly growth defective (Fig. 2A). We assumed that the InsTipα insertion in atpD inactivates ATP synthase (29). We therefore analyzed the growth of WH851 and the atpD+ parent strain on minimal medium with a nonfermentable carbon source. In contrast to the atpD+ strain, WH851 displayed no growth on agar plates containing minimal medium with succinate as the sole carbon source (data not shown). Since growth on this medium depends on a functional oxidative phosphorylation system, this phenotype is consistent with a nonfunctional ATP synthase (14, 18). This assumption was further supported by the growth phenotype in liquid minimal medium supplemented with limiting amounts of glucose as the sole carbon source (18, 34); in this medium, WH851 reached a maximal optical density of 0.3, in contrast to an optical density of 1.0 for the atpD+ reference strain (data not shown), again indicating the absence of oxidative phosphorylation.

At regular intervals during the growth periods, cells were collected from all candidate strains and the parent strain to determine the β-Gal activities during exponential and stationary growth (Fig. 2A to E). The parent strain showed no change in β-Gal activity throughout the entire experiment, although the β-Gal activity could be induced 40-fold by the addition of Tc (Fig. 1D) (35). Only background levels of β-Gal activity were detected for the candidate strains during exponential growth (Fig. 2A to E). However, for PpiD-InsTip1, YraI-InsTip1, YicO-InsTip1, and YfdX-InsTip1, a rapid increase in β-Gal activity was observed at the onset of the stationary growth phase, reaching a plateau by the 20-h time point of the experiment (Fig. 2B to E). With a value of approximately 1,100 units (23), WH852 has demonstrated the highest level of β-Gal activity. In contrast, we detected an increase in β-Gal activity within the stationary growth phase for WH851, but it was delayed and not as pronounced as the increases for the other strains. In addition, it did not reach a plateau during the 40-h time frame of the experiment (Fig. 2A).

We calculated an approximately sixfold increase in β-Gal activity of WH853 with the YraI-InsTip1 fusion for the transition from mid-exponential growth (4 h) to full stationary phase (20 to 40 h) (Fig. 2C). This observation is in excellent agreement with published data from transcriptome profiling in which a 4.1-fold increase in the mRNA level was observed due to the growth phase shift (11).

In WH854, we established expression of the YicO-InsTip1 fusion in stationary phase. yicO promoter activity was previously reported to be induced in the early stationary phase by overexpression of the two-component regulatory system BaeSR using a transcriptional reporter gene fusion (1). In contrast, a whole-genome microarray analysis of BaeSR-dependent gene expression from mid-exponential-phase cultures showed no increase of yicO expression (24). Our results for YicO-InsTip1 expression are in full agreement with the results of both of these earlier reports and explain their apparently diverse results.

In WH855, InsTipα had integrated into the yfdX gene. Since yfdX is an essential gene (6), both the insertion and the identical growth curves of WH855 and the yfdX+ reference strain at 37°C indicate that residues in a C-terminal position from Gly158 are not needed for growth under these conditions (Fig. 2E). A transcriptome comparison of exponentially grown cells with stationary-phase cells of E. coli showed that yfdX is induced significantly in the stationary phase (see supplemental data from reference 31 as cited in reference 22). Our data from the YfdX-InsTip1 fusion corroborate this result (Fig. 2E).

Besides being able to detect the expression of InsTip1 fusion proteins on MacConkey and minimal media, we can also use InsTip1 to determine quantitative differences in protein expression. A threefold-higher expression level of a ppiD-lacZ transcriptional fusion has been reported for exponentially growing E. coli in minimal medium with pyruvate as the sole carbon source than with glycerol as the sole carbon source (5). Therefore, we analyzed β-Gal activity of WH852 cells under these conditions and found a twofold-higher β-Gal activity for growth with pyruvate than with glycerol within the exponential growth phase. Thus, the result obtained with this translational fusion is in excellent agreement with the data from a transcriptional fusion (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Carbon source-dependent differential expression of PpiD-InsTip1. β-Gal activities of WH207(λtet50)/pWH1911 (closed bars) and WH852 (open bars) grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.2 in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 50 mM glycerol or pyruvate. The y axis displays the β-Gal activities in Miller units (MU) (23). Each value was determined in triplicate and is shown with standard deviations (error bars). The dotted lines indicate the background β-Gal activities determined for the untagged parent strain, which were subtracted from the β-Gal activities of the tagged strain to determine the induction factor.

Conclusions.

We have successfully used the peptide Tip (16) as a protein expression tag. We constructed an in-frame fusion which indicates the expression of the tagged target gene by readout of a separated lacZ gene. In contrast to direct lacZ fusions, this introduces only a 30-amino-acid-long extension after the insertion site, turning the protein fusion into an inducer for TetR. The induction of a separated reporter gene should lead to amplification of the signal. We constructed an InsTipα insertion element, formed the complex with hyperactive tranposase (8), randomly mutated (12) the model organism E. coli, and obtained five candidates out of 6,400 insertion mutants. The tagged proteins were detected during the stationary growth phase, extending and confirming published expression data from transcriptional fusions or microarrays for atpD, ppiD, yraI, yicO, and yfdX, thereby validating the Tip tag approach. We could also measure expression of ppiD during the exponential growth phase. Together with the ability to detect proteins of essential and nonessential genes, as well as proteins localized in the cytoplasm, the inner membrane, or the periplasm with the tag, our results clearly demonstrate the applicability of InsTipα as a global tag. These results encourage us to further improve the insertion efficiency and to expand the detection of active InsTip1 fusion proteins by avoiding polar effects on downstream genes through inclusion of an outward promoter in the element (15). We also aim to improve detection of protein expression within the exponential phase via enhanced screening, for example, by reduction of the relatively high basal level of β-Gal activity under repressed conditions to enlarge the detection window (20) or by the use of selection systems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through SFB473 and GRK805 and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.

We thank Marcus Klotzsche and Anke Friedlein for fruitful discussions.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 March 2006.
    • Accepted 19 May 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Baranova, N., and H. Nikaido. 2002. The BaeSR two-component regulatory system activates transcription of the yegMNOB (mdtABCD) transporter gene cluster in Escherichia coli and increases its resistance to novobiocin and deoxycholate. J. Bacteriol.184:4168-4176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Bertram, R., M. Köstner, J. Müller, J. Vazquez Ramos, and W. Hillen. 2005. Integrative elements for Bacillus subtilis yielding tetracycline-dependent growth phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res.33:e153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    Brent, R., and M. Ptashne. 1981. Mechanism of action of the lexA gene product. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA78:4204-4208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Cherepanov, P. P., and W. Wackernagel. 1995. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene158:9-14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Dartigalongue, C., and S. Raina. 1998. A new heat-shock gene, ppiD, encodes a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase required for folding of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. EMBO J.17:3968-3980.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. 6.↵
    Gerdes, S. Y., M. D. Scholle, J. W. Campbell, G. Balázsi, E. Ravasz, M. D. Daugherty, A. L. Somera, N. C. Kyrpides, I. Anderson, M. S. Gelfand, A. Bhattacharya, V. Kapatral, M. D'Souza, M. V. Baev, Y. Grechkin, F. Mseeh, M. Y. Fonstein, R. Overbeek, A. L. Barabási, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Osterman. 2003. Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J. Bacteriol.185:5673-5684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Ghaemmaghami, S., W. K. Huh, K. Bower, R. W. Howson, A. Belle, N. Dephoure, E. K. O'Shea, and J. S. Weissman. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature425:737-741.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Goryshin, I. Y., J. Jendrisak, L. M. Hoffman, R. Meis, and W. S. Reznikoff. 2000. Insertional transposon mutagenesis by electroporation of released Tn5 transposition complexes. Nat. Biotechnol.18:97-100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Griffin, T. J., D. R. Goodlett, and R. Aebersold. 2001. Advances in proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.12:607-612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Guérout-Fleury, A.-M., K. Shazand, N. Frandsen, and P. Stragier. 1995. Antibiotic-resistance cassettes for Bacillus subtilis. Gene167:335-336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Haddadin, F. T., and S. W. Harcum. 2005. Transcriptome profiles for high-cell-density recombinant and wild-type Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng.90:127-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Hoffman, L. M., J. J. Jendrisak, R. J. Meis, I. Y. Goryshin, and W. S. Reznikoff. 2000. Transposome insertional mutagenesis and direct sequencing of microbial genomes. Genetica108:19-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Huh, W. K., J. V. Falvo, L. C. Gerke, A. S. Carroll, R. W. Howson, J. S. Weissman, and E. K. O'Shea. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature425:686-691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Jones, P. C. 2001. Introduction of a carboxyl group in the first transmembrane helix of Escherichia coli F1Fo ATPase subunit c and cytoplasmic pH regulation. J. Bacteriol.183:1524-1530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Kang, Y., T. Durfee, J. D. Glasner, Y. Qiu, D. Frisch, K. M. Winterberg, and F. R. Blattner. 2004. Systematic mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli genome. J. Bacteriol.186:4921-4930.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Klotzsche, M., C. Berens, and W. Hillen. 2005. A peptide triggers allostery in Tet repressor by binding to a unique site. J. Biol. Chem.280:24591-24599.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Köstner, M., B. Schmidt, R. Bertram, and W. Hillen. 2006. Generating tetracycline-inducible auxotrophy in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by using an insertion element and a hyperactive transposase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72:4717-4725.
  18. 18.↵
    Lee, R. S., J. Pagan, S. Wilke-Mounts, and A. E. Senior. 1991. Characterization of Escherichia coli ATP synthase β-subunit mutations using a chromosomal deletion strain. Biochemistry30:6842-6847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Lesley, S. A., J. Graziano, C. Y. Cho, M. W. Knuth, and H. E. Klock. 2002. Gene expression response to misfolded protein as a screen for soluble recombinant protein. Protein Eng.15:153-160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Lutz, R., and H. Bujard. 1997. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res.25:1203-1210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Manoil, C., J. J. Mekalanos, and J. Beckwith. 1990. Alkaline phosphatase fusions: sensors of subcellular location. J. Bacteriol.172:515-518.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Masuda, N., and G. M. Church. 2002. Escherichia coli gene expression responsive to levels of the response regulator EvgA. J. Bacteriol.184:6225-6234.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  24. 24.↵
    Nishino, K., T. Honda, and A. Yamaguchi. 2005. Genome-wide analyses of Escherichia coli gene expression responsive to the BaeSR two-component regulatory system. J. Bacteriol.187:1763-1772.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Rabilloud, T. 2002. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains. Proteomics2:3-10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Reznikoff, W. S. 2003. Tn5 as a model for understanding DNA transposition. Mol. Microbiol.47:1199-1206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Riley, M., T. Abe, M. B. Arnaud, M. K. Berlyn, F. R. Blattner, R. R. Chaudhuri, J. D. Glasner, T. Horiuchi, I. M. Keseler, T. Kosuge, H. Mori, N. T. Perna, G. Plunkett III, K. E. Rudd, M. H. Serres, G. H. Thomas, N. R. Thomson, D. Wishart, and B. L. Wanner. 2006. Escherichia coli K-12: a cooperatively developed annotation snapshot—2005. Nucleic Acids Res.34:1-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Ross-Macdonald, P., P. S. Coelho, T. Roemer, S. Agarwal, A. Kumar, R. Jansen, K. H. Cheung, A. Sheehan, D. Symoniatis, L. Umansky, M. Heidtman, F. K. Nelson, H. Iwasaki, K. Hager, M. Gerstein, P. Miller, G. S. Roeder, and M. Snyder. 1999. Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption. Nature402:413-418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Schemidt, R. A., C. K. Brauning, A. Bouvier, and W. S. Brusilow. 1996. Localization of a conformational energy-coupling determinant near the C terminus of the β subunit of the F1F0-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem.271:33390-33393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Schollmeier, K., D. Gärtner, and W. Hillen. 1985. A bidirectionally active signal for termination of transcription is located between tetA and orfL on transposon Tn10. Nucleic Acids Res.13:4227-4237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Selinger, D. W., K. J. Cheung, R. Mei, E. M. Johansson, C. S. Richmond, F. R. Blattner, D. J. Lockhart, and G. M. Church. 2000. RNA expression analysis using a 30 base pair resolution Escherichia coli genome array. Nat. Biotechnol.18:1262-1268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.
    Smith, L. D., and K. P. Bertrand. 1988. Mutations in the Tn10 tet repressor that interfere with induction. Location of the tetracycline-binding domain. J. Mol. Biol.203:949-959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Uzzau, S., N. Figueroa-Bossi, S. Rubino, and L. Bossi. 2001. Epitope tagging of chromosomal genes in Salmonella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:15264-15269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Wise, J. G. 1990. Site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved β subunit tyrosine 331 of Escherichia coli ATP synthase yields catalytically active enzymes. J. Biol. Chem.265:10403-10409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Wissmann, A., L. V. Wray, Jr., U. Somaggio, R. Baumeister, M. Geissendörfer, and W. Hillen. 1991. Selection for Tn10 Tet repressor binding to tet operator in Escherichia coli: isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants and combinatorial mutagenesis in the DNA binding motif. Genetics128:225-232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Random Insertion of a TetR-Inducing Peptide Tag into Escherichia coli Proteins Allows Analysis of Protein Levels by Induction of Reporter Gene Expression
Maximilian Schlicht, Christian Berens, Janko Daam, Wolfgang Hillen
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2006, 72 (8) 5637-5642; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00739-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Random Insertion of a TetR-Inducing Peptide Tag into Escherichia coli Proteins Allows Analysis of Protein Levels by Induction of Reporter Gene Expression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Random Insertion of a TetR-Inducing Peptide Tag into Escherichia coli Proteins Allows Analysis of Protein Levels by Induction of Reporter Gene Expression
Maximilian Schlicht, Christian Berens, Janko Daam, Wolfgang Hillen
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2006, 72 (8) 5637-5642; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00739-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Construction and function of InsTipα in E. coli.
    • Determining fusion protein expression by InsTip1-induced β-Gal expression.
    • Conclusions.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DNA Transposable Elements
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Genes, Reporter
Peptides

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336