Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Cloning and Overexpression of Alkaline Phosphatase PhoK from Sphingomonas sp. Strain BSAR-1 for Bioprecipitation of Uranium from Alkaline Solutions

Kayzad S. Nilgiriwala, Anuradha Alahari, Amara Sambasiva Rao, Shree Kumar Apte
Kayzad S. Nilgiriwala
1Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anuradha Alahari
2UMR5235, Universite de Montpellier, Place Eugene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amara Sambasiva Rao
1Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shree Kumar Apte
1Molecular Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aptesk@barc.gov.in
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00107-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Cells of Sphingomonas sp. strain BSAR-1 constitutively expressed an alkaline phosphatase, which was also secreted in the extracellular medium. A null mutant lacking this alkaline phosphatase activity was isolated by Tn5 random mutagenesis. The corresponding gene, designated phoK, was cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3). The resultant E. coli strain EK4 overexpressed cellular activity 55 times higher and secreted extracellular PhoK activity 13 times higher than did BSAR-1. The recombinant strain very rapidly precipitated >90% of input uranium in less than 2 h from alkaline solutions (pH, 9 ± 0.2) containing 0.5 to 5 mM of uranyl carbonate, compared to BSAR-1, which precipitated uranium in >7 h. In both strains BSAR-1 and EK4, precipitated uranium remained cell bound. The EK4 cells exhibited a much higher loading capacity of 3.8 g U/g dry weight in <2 h compared to only 1.5 g U/g dry weight in >7 h in BSAR-1. The data demonstrate the potential utility of genetically engineering PhoK for the bioprecipitation of uranium from alkaline solutions.

Environmental metal pollution is a serious problem, and treatment/recovery of desired metals from such wastes is a major challenge. Effective immobilization of radionuclides of metals is critical in order to prevent groundwater contamination (17). Bioremediation of the toxic metal wastes by microbes offers a relatively inexpensive and ecofriendly alternative to commonly used physical and chemical methods (7, 19, 26). In particular, enzymatic bioprecipitation of heavy metals as metal phosphates is very attractive, since it can recover metals from very low concentrations not amenable to chemical techniques (18). Successful bioprecipitation of metals, such as uranium and cadmium, using acid phosphatase from naturally occurring bacteria, such as Citrobacter sp. (19), has been reported. The uranium bioprecipitation potentials of Bacillus sp., Rahnella sp. (5, 20), Pseudomonas sp. (22), and Salmonella sp. (27) in an acidic-to-neutral pH range have also been explored. Genetic engineering of the radio-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1 by using a nonspecific acid phosphatase, PhoN, for the biorecovery of uranium from dilute acidic/neutral wastes was reported by our laboratory recently (2).

Based on the process used, uranium mining and processing generate large quantities of dilute acidic and alkaline nuclear waste containing uranium, which are dumped as mill tailings. Alkaline wastes containing traces of uranium also arise from nuclear reactors and power plants using uranium as fuel. In nature, uranium (VI) forms highly soluble carbonate complexes, such as [UO2(CO3)2]−2 and [UO2(CO3)3]−4, at alkaline pH levels (9). This leads to increase in mobility and availability of uranium to groundwater and soil from the dumped nuclear wastes, leading to health hazards. Nearly 130 million liters of alkaline nuclear wastes containing uranium carbonate awaits disposition at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC, alone (9). In order to extend microbial remediation possibilities to alkaline wastes, we have been exploring efficient microbial alkaline phosphatase sources.

Alkaline phosphatases (EC 3.1.3.1) are ubiquitously distributed and highly conserved in bacteria, archaea, yeast, plants, and mammalian cells (21) and play indispensable roles in microbial ecology, through their involvement in phosphate nutrition, signal transduction (14), and virulence of bacteria (16). Alkaline phosphatases also form key components of molecular techniques, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blotting, and immunodetection (28). However their utility for metal-phosphate precipitation has not been explored so far. Recently, we isolated a Sphingomonas sp. strain, BSAR-1, hereafter referred to as BSAR-1, exhibiting high alkaline phosphatase activity. In this paper, we report cloning of the corresponding alkaline phosphatase gene, designated phoK, from BSAR-1, its overexpression in E. coli, and application in the bioprecipitation of uranium from alkaline solution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, and probes used in this study are described in Table 1. BSAR-1 was isolated in our laboratory as a contaminant from histochemical plates used for screening for phosphatases and identified as a Sphingomonas sp. by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (GenBank accession no. AY764287). The strain was grown aerobically in TGY (1% Bacto tryptone, 0.1% glucose, and 0.5% yeast extract) medium at 30°C under agitation at 180 rpm and E. coli in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C under agitation at 180 rpm. Growth was determined as turbidity (absorbance at 600 nm) or CFU on TGY agar plates after 48 h of incubation in the case of Sphingomonas sp. BSAR-1 and as that on LB agar plates after 24 h of incubation in the case of E. coli strains. The antibiotic concentrations used were 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 25 μg ml−1 kanamycin for BSAR-1 mutants and 100 μg ml−1 carbenicillin, 33 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol, or 50 μg ml−1 kanamycin for various E. coli strains, when required.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, and probes used in this study

Tn5 random mutagenesis of strain BSAR-1.Strain BSAR-1 was conjugated with E. coli ANU1041 carrying the plasmid pACYC184-Mob::Tn5 containing the Tn5 transposon (Table 1). The exconjugants were plated on histochemical TGY agar plates containing 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin (BSAR-1 being inherently resistant to streptomycin) and 25 μg ml−1 kanamycin (for selection of Tn5 transposition events) along with 1 mg ml−1 phenolphthalein diphosphate (PDP) and 50 μg ml−1 methyl green (MG) for selection of phosphatase-active/-inactive colonies as described earlier (23). On these plates, the wild-type strain showed a bluish-green precipitation zone, while no such zone was observed in the case of an alkaline phosphatase-null mutant. A mutant colony (designated KN20) with an alkaline phosphatase-null phenotype was obtained by screening more than 2,000 Tn5 random mutants and was confirmed to be of the strain BSAR-1 by partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (GenBank accession no. AY764287). The genomic DNA of mutant KN20 was assessed for the Tn5 insertion by Southern blotting and hybridization using a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled nonradioactive Tn5 probe (3, 24).

DNA sequencing and analysis.DNA sequencing was carried out using various primers (Table 1) by the dideoxy DNA sequencing method of Sanger et al. (25). Similarity searches were carried out by computational analysis using the BLAST algorithms available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST .

Phosphatase activity.Stationary-phase culture of BSAR-1 or isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced culture (induction at 30°C for 4 h) of an E. coli clone (EK4) was tested for acid or alkaline phosphatase activity in 100 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) or 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.0), respectively, as described earlier (6). The pHs of assay mixtures were varied using the following buffers: 50 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 3 to 6), 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7 to 9), and 100 mM carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.2 to 11). The phosphatase activity was expressed as nanomoles para-nitrophenol liberated min−1 from disodium para-nitrophenyl phosphate. In-gel zymogram analysis was carried out with cell extracts obtained by sonication (Branson, Germany) followed by electrophoretic resolution and activity staining, as described earlier (2, 23), except that acetate buffer was replaced by 100 mM Tris-100 mM NaCl buffer (pH 9.5).

Uranium precipitation.Uranium precipitation assays were performed as described previously (19) with certain modifications. Uranyl carbonate stock was freshly prepared by adding saturated ammonium carbonate to 100 mM uranyl nitrate solution (8). Overnight-grown cultures (final optical density at 600 nm [OD600], 1.0) of BSAR-1, KN20, and the induced EK4 clone (induced with 1 mM IPTG at 30°C for 4 h) were recovered from their respective growth media, washed twice with saline, and independently treated with 0.5 to 5 mM uranyl carbonate solution in 2 mM carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.2 (final pH of assay was 9.0 ± 0.2), supplemented with 5 mM β-glycerophosphate (β-GP) as the substrate at 30°C under static nongrowing conditions in a final volume of 5 ml. Appropriate abiotic and biotic controls were included to ascertain phosphatase-mediated bioprecipitation. Dead cells, obtained by treatment of cells at 100°C for 15 min that did not disturb their structural integrity (data not included), were also assayed. Aliquots taken at different time intervals were centrifuged (12,000 × g for 10 min). Residual uranium in the supernatant or cell pellet was estimated using arsenazo III by the method of Fritz and Bradford (11). The samples (2 to 20 μl) were acidified (in 200 μl of 0.01 N HCl), and then 200 μl of arsenazo III was added to the samples. The resultant purple-colored metal-arsenazo III complex was estimated spectrophotometrically at 655 nm using uranyl nitrate hexahydrate (Merck) as the standard. Metal precipitation was expressed as the percent precipitation of input uranium added initially.

X-ray diffraction analysis.Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed to identify the nature of bioprecipitated uranium. The cells of strains BSAR-1 and EK4, before and after uranium bioprecipitation, were dried in glass petri dishes in an oven at 60°C for 2 h. The dried pellet was scrapped and crushed to a fine powder, which was subjected to XRD analysis using a high-precision Philips X-ray diffractometer (model PW1071) with Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation. An exposure time of 2 h was used. The diffraction pattern was recorded from 10° to 50° 2θ, the step length of 2θ being 0.02°. The data fittings were performed by comparing the data peaks with known standards of uranyl phosphate species, as described in the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The complete nucleotide sequence of the alkaline phosphatase gene designated phoK has been submitted to GenBank (accession no. EF143994).

RESULTS

Alkaline phosphatase activity in BSAR-1.The strain BSAR-1 showed a growth-dependent expression of the alkaline phosphatase with highest activity during the stationary phase of growth (23 h of growth [OD600, 1]) (Fig. 1A). Stationary-phase cells exhibited minor acid phosphatase activity (pH 5.0) and major alkaline phosphatase activity (pH 9.0) (Fig. 1B). Nearly 40% of the total alkaline phosphatase was found secreted in the medium after 23 h of growth.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Constitutive expression and pH dependence of the alkaline phosphatase PhoK. (A) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity of BSAR-1 cells (equivalent to 100 μl of cells with OD600 of 1) and equivalent spent medium (for extracellular activity) seen at various time points during growth. (B) The pH dependence of the phosphatase activity of BSAR-1. Activity was assayed after 23 h of growth in 100 μl culture aliquots containing BSAR-1 cells with OD600 of 1 and equivalent spent medium. All the assays were conducted with three replicates, and the standard errors for the results are shown in the graph. p-NP, para-nitrophenol.

Cloning of the phoK gene.A Tn5 random mutagenesis as described in Materials and Methods, followed by a chromosome walking-based cloning approach, was used. Screening of more than 2,000 Tn5 random mutants of BSAR-1 yielded a single colony having an alkaline phosphatase-null phenotype (designated KN20). The site of the Tn5 insertion in KN20 mutant was determined, its flanking region was subcloned and sequenced, and then the complete phoK gene was cloned, as illustrated in Fig. 2A and B. Initial hybridization experiments were conducted with an nptII probe from Tn5, and the smallest 3-kb SalI fragment was cloned in the pBluescriptII SK(+) vector in E. coli DH5α and was designated EK1 (Fig. 2A and C). The 3-kb insert in the plasmid in EK1 was sequenced using M13 universal primers (Table 1), which confirmed the presence of a DNA (441 bp) flanking the Tn5 and homologous to an internal stretch of a predicted alkaline phosphodiesterase/nucleotide pyrophosphatase of Sphingomonas sp. strain SKA58. Primers 441Fin, 441Rin, 441Fout, and 441Rout (Table 1; Fig. 2B) were used to sequence the DNA flanking either side of the 441-bp DNA fragment subcloned from EK1. A new ∼400-bp SXEK1 probe (Table 1; Fig. 2A) was constructed by digesting the plasmid from clone EK1 with SalI-XmnI and was used to screen the genomic-DNA digests of BSAR-1 (Fig. 2B). The smallest DNA fragment (3-kb PstI-BglII) was subcloned in the pBluescriptII SK(+) vector and designated EK2 (Fig. 2B and D). Restriction digestion of EK2 (Fig. 2E) showed that it contained the complete phoK gene (Fig. 2B). EK2 exhibited an alkaline phosphatase-positive phenotype on selective histochemical plates containing PDP and MG (data not shown). Primers Fow and Row were used for primer walking on the gene in the clone EK2 (Fig. 2B) to obtain the complete nucleotide sequence of the alkaline phosphatase gene, designated phoK, which has been submitted to GenBank (accession no. EF143994).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Mutagenesis and cloning of phoK from BSAR-1. (A) Schematic representation (not to the scale) of the Tn5 insertion in KN20 showing the clone EK1 and the DNA probes used. (B) The phoK gene in BSAR-1 and clones obtained therefrom. (C to E) Southern blotting and hybridization. (C) SalI-digested genomic DNA of BSAR-1 (lane 1) and of the KN20 mutant (lane 2) hybridized to the nptII probe. (D) Genomic DNA of BSAR-1 hybridized to the SXEK1 probe. The DNA was digested with PstI (lane 1), BglII (lane 2), BamHI (lane 3), PstI-BglII (lane 4), PstI-BamHI (lane 5), or BglII-BamHI (lane 6). (E) Analysis of the clone EK2 with SXEK1 probe. The lanes marked + and − contain the SXEK1 probe and an empty pBluescriptII SK(+) vector, respectively, and are used as the positive and negative controls, respectively. The recombinant plasmid in EK2 was linearized with PstI (lane 1) or digested with SalI-XmnI (lane 2).

Overexpression of alkaline phosphatase.The complete phoK gene was PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of BSAR-1 by using the primers FDNE and RDXE (Table 1; Fig. 2B), restriction digested with NdeI-XhoI, and cloned in the pET29b overexpression vector containing a C-terminal His6 tag. The recombinant plasmid was transformed in E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS cells to obtain strain EK4. The EK4 cells were grown to an OD600 of 0.8 and induced for 4 h at 30°C with 1 mM IPTG. A comparison of alkaline phosphatase activities of colonies of BSAR-1, KN20, induced E. coli pET29b, and EK4 on histochemical plates containing their respective antibiotics is shown in Fig. 3A. KN20 showed green colonies due to the presence of acid phosphatase but lacked the bluish-green halo of secreted alkaline phosphatase in BSAR-1, which was enhanced by the IPTG induction of EK4. The induction of the PhoK alkaline phosphatase (an ∼60-kDa monomer on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [data not shown]) was at its maximum level after 4 h at 30°C. Zymogram analysis under mild denaturing conditions showed significant enhancement in the alkaline phosphatase activity of EK4 visualized as a major high-molecular-mass protein (Fig. 3B), suggesting that active PhoK may be a multimeric protein. The EK4 lysate additionally showed a minor 60-kDa activity band, probably due to the presence of excess protein monomer due to overexpression. Size exclusion chromatography using Sephacryl S400 also indicated that the active enzyme is a multimer (∼200 kDa) (data not shown). The PhoK activities of the IPTG-induced EK4 cells were 55 and 13 times higher in cells and in external medium, respectively, relative to those of BSAR-1 cells (Fig. 3C). No significant difference was observed in their acid phosphatase activity, as expected.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Phenotypic selection of strains for alkaline phosphatase. (A) Bacterial strains were grown on TGY agar (quadrants 1 and 2) or LB agar (quadrants 3 and 4) containing PDP and MG with the appropriate antibiotics at 30°C for 48 h. (B) Zymogram analysis of cell lysates from BSAR-1 and KN20 grown at 30°C for 23 h, E. coli pET29b cells, and EK4 cells induced with 1 mM IPTG at 30°C for 4 h. (C) Phosphatase activities of cells and corresponding spent media in cultures of BSAR-1, KN20, and IPTG-induced EK4 at pHs 5.0 and 9.0. All the assays were conducted with three replicates, and the standard errors for the results are shown in the graph. p-NP, para-nitrophenol.

Uranium bioprecipitation.Strains BSAR-1 and KN20 and clone EK4 induced with IPTG were evaluated for their uranium precipitation abilities with 5 mM β-GP as the substrate (Table 2; Fig. 4A to C). BSAR-1 cells showed a lag of 4 h at a uranyl carbonate concentration of 0.5 mM and a lag of 2 h at a 2 mM concentration of uranyl carbonate before commencement of uranium precipitation. The induced phoK-overexpressing clone EK4 showed more than 90% uranium precipitation within 1 h of exposure to 0.5 to 2 mM uranyl carbonate, whereas strain BSAR-1 achieved such precipitation after 6 to 8 h of exposure to the uranyl carbonate solution (Fig. 4A and B). At a 5 mM uranium concentration, uranium bioprecipitation was limited by the available substrate concentration (Fig. 4C), and EK4 and BSAR-1 cells showed only 55% and 37% precipitations, respectively. When a higher substrate concentration (10 mM β-GP) was used, EK4 showed ∼90% bioprecipitation in 2 h while BSAR-1 still showed only 47% precipitation before reaching its loading saturation in 7 h (Fig. 4D) since it contains ∼55 times less PhoK than does EK4. The KN20 mutant completely lacked uranium precipitation ability in all the assays (Table 2; Fig. 4A and B). The abiotic controls with and without β-GP did not show any spontaneous precipitation, while the dead-cell biotic controls and E. coli BL21 containing pET29b showed less than 8% biosorption/bioprecipitation even after prolonged exposure (Table 2). Uranium-loading capacities of BSAR-1 and EK4 cells were found to be 1.533 and 3.825 g uranium per g dry weight, respectively.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Uranium bioprecipitation by various strains. The bioprecipitation assays were conducted with cells (OD600, 1) of BSAR-1 and KN20 and strain EK4 induced with IPTG at 30°C in the presence of 5 mM β-GP (A to C) or 10 mM β-GP (D) as the substrate. Uranium was added to the assays as uranyl carbonate at a concentration of 0.5 mM (A), 2 mM (B), or 5 mM (C and D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Bioprecipitation of uranium from 2 mM uranyl carbonate solution

Identity of the bioprecipitated uranium.The XRD patterns of the uranium-loaded cells of BSAR-1 and EK4 (Fig. 5) confirmed the presence of uranyl hydrogen phosphate hydrate H2(UO2)2(PO4)2·8H2O, also known as chernikovite or hydrogen meta-autunite, by data fitting in which at least 16 data peaks showed a match with the identified chemical species of uranium (ICDD CAS no. 08-0296). Interestingly, the XRD patterns of uranium-loaded BSAR-1 cells and engineered EK4 cells were quite identical.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Identity of bioprecipitated uranium. XRD spectra of BSAR-1 cells before exposure to uranium (A) and after 8 h of exposure to 2 mM uranyl carbonate solution (B) were compared with XRD spectra of EK4 cells before exposure to uranium (C) and after 3 h of exposure to 2 mM uranyl carbonate solution (D).

DISCUSSION

A large number of Sphingomonas sp. strains have been isolated from different environments as novel species capable of biodegradation of organic pollutants (10, 12). A related organism, Caulobacter crescentus, may hold promise to precipitate toxic metals (13). However, bioremediation of metals involving phosphatases from the genus Sphingomonas has not yet been explored. A Sphingomonas sp. strain, BSAR-1, was isolated in our laboratory and shown to possess very high alkaline phosphatase activity. The corresponding gene, designated phoK, was cloned first by its functional inactivation by Tn5 random mutagenesis, followed by cloning of the native gene by chromosomal walking using Tn5-targeted DNA as a probe. The recombinant PhoK protein has 559 amino acids and an estimated molecular mass of 59,982 Da. The enzyme was released extracellularly and showed optimum activity at pH 9.

This study evaluated the precipitation of uranium from alkaline solutions using PhoK alkaline phosphatase. A recombinant E. coli strain, EK4, was constructed to overexpress PhoK. The strain bioprecipitated uranium very rapidly and removed >90% of input uranium in less than 2 h from 0.5 to 5 mM concentrations, compared to the native BSAR-1 strain, which precipitated uranium in >7 h (Fig. 4 and 5). It is rather difficult to precipitate uranium as phosphate in the presence of excess carbonate at pH 9.0. However, earlier studies (29) have shown that it is feasible only at log(PO4−3/CO3−2) values of >−3. We determined the amount of Pi released by our strains in the absence of uranium and calculated the log(PO4−3/CO3−2) value in assays containing 0.5 to 5 mM uranium concentrations. Data obtained at 2 mM uranyl carbonate concentration is shown in Table 3. The required ratio was attained in all cases, thereby facilitating extracellular precipitation of uranium as phosphate at pH 9. The precipitated uranium remained cell bound, leading to high loading of uranium up to 1.5 g U/g dry weight for BSAR-1 and 3.8 g U/g dry weight for EK4 at 5 mM uranyl carbonate at pH 9.0 in 2 h and 6 h, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) released in bioprecipitation assays

Bioprecipitation of heavy metals, including uranium, has been shown to be successful using bacterial strains producing acid phosphatases (2, 4, 5, 15, 19, 20). Treatment of alkaline wastes containing uranium and other heavy metals, though desirable, has been somewhat neglected (9). As mentioned earlier, in alkaline mill tailings and other nuclear wastes, migration of uranium into groundwater is facilitated by formation of stable uranyl carbonate complexes in nature and can have a catastrophic effect on the ecosystems (1). Recovery of uranium from such wastes is desirable not only to protect the environment but also to recover traces of valuable uranium, which is not possible by physicochemical processes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first instance of bioprecipitation of uranium from alkaline solutions by using an alkaline phosphatase. The data presented demonstrate that engineering alkaline phosphatases for bioprecipitation of heavy metals holds promise for the development of appropriate technologies for the recovery of uranium from alkaline nuclear wastes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge MTCC, IMTECH, Chandigarh, India, for providing E. coli strain ANU1041 (pACYC184-Mob)::Tn5. Thanks are due to Rita Mukhopadhayay for DNA sequencing and to Ningthoujam Raghumani Singh and Rakesh Shukla, Chemistry Division, BARC, Mumbai, India, for XRD studies.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 January 2008.
    • Accepted 9 July 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abdelouas, A., W. Lutze, and E. Nuttall. 1998. Chemical reactions of uranium in ground water at a mill tailings site. J. Contam. Hydrol.34:343-361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Appukuttan, D., A. S. Rao, and S. K. Apte. 2006. Engineering of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 for bioprecipitation of uranium from dilute nuclear waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72:7873-7878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 2005. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
  4. 4.↵
    Basnakova, G., E. R. Stephens, M. C. Thaller, G. M. Rossolini, and L. E. Macaskie. 1998. The use of Escherichia coli bearing a phoN gene for the removal of uranium and nickel from aqueous flows. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.50:266-272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Beazley, M. J., R. J. Martinez, P. A. Sobecky, S. M. Webb, and M. Taillefert. 2007. Uranium biomineralization as a result of bacterial phosphatase activity: insights from bacterial isolates from a contaminated subsurface. Environ. Sci. Technol.41:5701-5707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Bolton, P. G., and A. C. Dean. 1972. Phosphatase synthesis in Klebsiella (aerobacter) aerogenes growing in continuous culture. Biochem. J.127:87-96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Chen, S., and D. B. Wilson. 1997. Construction and characterization of Escherichia coli genetically engineered for bioremediation of Hg2+-contaminated environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63:2442-2445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Cordfunke, E. H. P. 1969. The chemistry of uranium including its applications in nuclear technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  9. 9.↵
    Duff, M. C., D. B. Hunter, D. T. Hobbs, S. D. Fink, Z. Dai, and J. P. Bradley. 2004. Mechanisms of strontium and uranium removal from high-level radioactive waste simulant solutions by the sorbent monosodium titanate. Environ. Sci. Technol.38:5201-5207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Feng, X., L. T. Ou, and A. Ogram. 1997. Plasmid-mediated mineralization of carbofuran by Sphingomonas sp. strain CF06. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63:1332-1337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Fritz, J. S., and E. C. Bradford. 1958. Detection of thorium and uranium. Anal. Chem.30:1021-1022.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Hernáez, M. J., W. Reineke, and E. Santero. 1999. Genetic analysis of biodegradation of tetralin by a Sphingomonas strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65:1806-1810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Hu, P., E. L. Brodie, Y. Suzuki, H. H. McAdams, and G. L. Andersen. 2005. Whole-genome transcriptional analysis of heavy metal stresses in Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol.187:8437-8449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Hulett, F. M. 1996. The signal-transduction network for Pho regulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol.19:933-939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Jeong, B. C., C. Hawes, K. M. Bonthrone, and L. E. Macaskie. 1997. Localization of enzymically enhanced heavy metal accumulation by Citrobacter sp. and metal accumulation in vitro by liposomes containing entrapped enzyme. Microbiology143:2497-2507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Kadurugamuwa, J. L., and T. J. Beveridge. 1997. Natural release of virulence factors in membrane vesicles by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the effect of aminoglycoside antibiotics on their release. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.40:615-621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Lieser, K. H. 1995. Radionuclides in the geosphere: sources, mobility, reactions in natural waters and interactions with solids. Radiochim. Acta70-71:355-375.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Lokhande, M., P. V. Achuthan, U. Jambunathan, A. Ramanujam, A. S. Rao, and S. K. Mahajan. 2001. Studies on the recovery of uranium using enzyme mediated and chemical methods, p. 224-225. Proceedings of the nuclear and radiochemistry symposium. Department of Chemistry, University of Pune, Pune, India.
  19. 19.↵
    Macaskie, L. E., K. M. Bonthrone, P. Yong, and D. T. Goddard. 2000. Enzymically mediated bioprecipitation of uranium by a Citrobacter sp.: a concerted role for exocellular lipopolysaccharide and associated phosphatase in biomineral formation. Microbiology146:1855-1867.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Martinez, R. J., M. J. Beazley, M. Taillefert, A. K. Arakaki, J. Skolnick, and P. A. Sobecky. 2007. Aerobic uranium (VI) bioprecipitation by metal-resistant bacteria isolated from radionuclide- and metal-contaminated subsurface soils. Environ. Microbiol.9:3122-3133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    O'Brien, P. J., and D. Herschlag. 2001. Functional interrelationships in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily: phosphodiesterase activity of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase. Biochemistry40:5691-5699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Renninger, N., R. Knopp, H. Nitsche, D. S. Clark, and J. D. Keasling. 2004. Uranyl precipitation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa via controlled polyphosphate metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70:7404-7412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Riccio, M. L., G. M. Rossolini, G. Lombardi, A. Chiesurin, and G. Satta. 1997. Expression cloning of different bacterial phosphatase-encoding genes by histochemical screening of genomic libraries onto an indicator medium containing phenolphthalein diphosphate and methyl green. J. Appl. Microbiol.82:177-185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  25. 25.↵
    Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA74:5463-5467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Sharma, P. K., D. L. Balkwill, A. Frenkel, and M. A. Vairavamurthy. 2000. A new Klebsiella planticola strain (Cd-1) grows anaerobically at high cadmium concentrations and precipitates cadmium sulfide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:3083-3087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Shelobolina, E. S., S. A. Sullivan, K. R. O'Neill, K. P. Nevin, and D. R. Lovley. 2004. Isolation, characterization, and U(VI)-reducing potential of a facultatively anaerobic, acid-resistant bacterium from low-pH, nitrate- and U(VI)-contaminated subsurface sediment and description of Salmonella subterranea sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70:2959-2965.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Tomazic-Allen, S. J. 1991. Recombinant bacterial alkaline phosphatase as an immunodiagnostic enzyme. Ann. Biol. Clin. (Paris)49:287-290.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Zheng, Z., J. Wan, X. Song, and T. K. Tokunaga. 2006. Sodium meta-autunite colloids: synthesis, characterization, and stability. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.274:48-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cloning and Overexpression of Alkaline Phosphatase PhoK from Sphingomonas sp. Strain BSAR-1 for Bioprecipitation of Uranium from Alkaline Solutions
Kayzad S. Nilgiriwala, Anuradha Alahari, Amara Sambasiva Rao, Shree Kumar Apte
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2008, 74 (17) 5516-5523; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00107-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cloning and Overexpression of Alkaline Phosphatase PhoK from Sphingomonas sp. Strain BSAR-1 for Bioprecipitation of Uranium from Alkaline Solutions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cloning and Overexpression of Alkaline Phosphatase PhoK from Sphingomonas sp. Strain BSAR-1 for Bioprecipitation of Uranium from Alkaline Solutions
Kayzad S. Nilgiriwala, Anuradha Alahari, Amara Sambasiva Rao, Shree Kumar Apte
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Aug 2008, 74 (17) 5516-5523; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00107-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Alkaline Phosphatase
Bacterial Proteins
Sphingomonas
uranium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336