Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Volatilization and Precipitation of Tellurium by Aerobic, Tellurite-Resistant Marine Microbes

Patrick R. L. Ollivier, Andrew S. Bahrou, Sarah Marcus, Talisha Cox, Thomas M. Church, Thomas E. Hanson
Patrick R. L. Ollivier
1College of Marine and Earth Studies
2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew S. Bahrou
1College of Marine and Earth Studies
3Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Marcus
3Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Talisha Cox
3Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas M. Church
1College of Marine and Earth Studies
2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas E. Hanson
1College of Marine and Earth Studies
3Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tehanson@udel.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00733-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Microbial resistance to tellurite, an oxyanion of tellurium, is widespread in the biosphere, but the geochemical significance of this trait is poorly understood. As some tellurite resistance markers appear to mediate the formation of volatile tellurides, the potential contribution of tellurite-resistant microbial strains to trace element volatilization in salt marsh sediments was evaluated. Microbial strains were isolated aerobically on the basis of tellurite resistance and subsequently examined for their capacity to volatilize tellurium in pure cultures. The tellurite-resistant strains recovered were either yeasts related to marine isolates of Rhodotorula spp. or gram-positive bacteria related to marine strains within the family Bacillaceae based on rRNA gene sequence comparisons. Most strains produced volatile tellurides, primarily dimethyltelluride, though there was a wide range of the types and amounts of species produced. For example, the Rhodotorula spp. produced the greatest quantities and highest diversity of volatile tellurium compounds. All strains also produced methylated sulfur compounds, primarily dimethyldisulfide. Intracellular tellurium precipitates were a major product of tellurite metabolism in all strains tested, with nearly complete recovery of the tellurite initially provided to cultures as a precipitate. Different strains appeared to produce different shapes and sizes of tellurium containing nanostructures. These studies suggest that aerobic marine yeast and Bacillus spp. may play a greater role in trace element biogeochemistry than has been previously assumed, though additional work is needed to further define and quantify their specific contributions.

Microbial resistance to the inorganic oxyanion tellurite (TeO32−) is a widespread phenomenon. In most environments sampled to date, tellurite-resistant organisms comprise ∼10% of the total culturable microbial population (42, 47). The biological significance of this relatively common trait is not yet established, though resistance to oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species has been proposed on the basis of studies in Escherichia coli (41). However, E. coli is actually very sensitive to tellurite (MIC, 1 to 2 μg ml−1 or 4.5 to 9.0 μM) relative to many other tellurite-resistant isolates (MIC, 150 to 2,500 μg ml−1 or 0.7 to 11.3 mM) (42, 47), making the universal relevance of E. coli studies unclear. Even less well understood is the occurrence of tellurite resistance among marine microorganisms from nonextreme environments and the biogeochemical roles that tellurite-resistant organisms may play in the marine environment.

While the cosmic abundance of Te is highest of any element with an atomic number of >40, Te is among the least abundant in the earth's crust (<10 ppb). However, it displays strong patterns of enrichment in different environments. In Fe-Mn crusts, it is the most enriched of the trace elements (104- to 105-fold), and it is the seventh most enriched in seawater (∼109-fold) relative to its crustal abundance (26). Tellurium was among the last four elements to be quantified in seawater using specialized hydride enrichment and cold vapor atomic absorption techniques (33) that distinguish only the two inorganic species (+IV and +VI). Seawater tellurium concentration was found to range from 0.5 pmol liter−1 at depth to 1 to 2 pmol liter−1 in open surface waters. Te concentrations increase in coastal (up to 7 pmol liter−1) and fresh (26 pmol liter−1) rain waters, suggesting some weathering or anthropogenic sources (1). Among known compounds of tellurium, the most common oxidation states are positive VI, IV, and II and negative II. Tellurite (positive IV) is the thermodynamically favored form in most waters. Volatile organic species of Te have not been previously detected in the marine environment, though evidence exists for the exchange of Po from coastal waters to the atmosphere (29), suggesting the presence of volatile Po species. The goal of this study was to isolate tellurite-resistant marine microbes as part of a larger study on the volatilization and evasion of group XVI metalloids like Te (S, Se, Po) from the marine environment.

In landfills, sewage digesters, soils, and freshwater sediments, both Se and Te are subject to methylation and volatilization (20, 39). The microbiology of Se and Te methylation and the interactions between bacteria and these elements have been reviewed recently (13, 55). What is known about the organisms and enzymes potentially driving these volatilization reactions comes from studies of gram-negative tellurite-resistant organisms, primarily Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria (47, 55). Production of alkylated tellurides may be mediated by tellurite resistance enzymes utilizing S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) as a methyl donor (15, 47). At least two independently evolved tellurite resistance genes encode potential SAM-dependent methyltransferase enzymes (10, 13, 47), and an in vitro study suggested an essential role for SAM in tellurite resistance in E. coli (35). Thiopurine methyltransferases have also been implicated as tellurite resistance markers in plant pathogenic pseudomonads, and genes encoding this activity were found in soils and freshwaters emitting organoselenides (16, 18, 19).

Tellurite-resistant gram-negative bacteria accumulate a black precipitate within cells that has been shown to be elemental tellurium (6, 11, 51). In gram-negative bacteria, the membrane localization of precipitates has been taken as evidence for the direct involvement of the respiratory electron transport chain in tellurite reduction (48), though this interpretation has been recently questioned (55). The utilization of tellurite as a terminal electron acceptor has been documented in the strict anaerobes Bacillus selenitireducens and Sulfurospirillum barnesii (6) and in hydrothermal vent isolates (17). Both B. selenitireducens and S. barnesii accumulated tellurium at the interface between the cell and the surrounding medium in distinct crystalline forms, and it was proposed that these strains might be used to synthesize tellurium nanomaterials for photovoltaics and quantum dot fluorophores. Another motivation for this study was to determine if aerobic organisms might be useful for these syntheses and to evaluate the production of potently toxic, volatile organotellurium side products in organisms that might be utilized for such syntheses.

In this study, obligately aerobic, highly tellurite-resistant microbes were isolated from salt marsh sediments by using a marine medium optimized to recover the greatest number of CFU from these sediments. The strains could be segregated into three categories based on colony morphology and degree of tellurite resistance. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that these strains are either eukaryotes of the genus Rhodotorula or prokaryotes of the order Bacillales, closely related to marine Bacillus spp. (23) and distinct from B. selenitireducens. All strains examined produced volatile, methylated species of both Te and S. They also efficiently precipitated high concentrations of tellurite under aerobic conditions. Elemental Te precipitates were a major end product of tellurite metabolism and accumulated intracellularly, with nanostructure morphologies differing between strains. These results lead us to conclude that aerobic gram-positive bacteria and yeasts play heretofore unrecognized roles in the marine biogeochemistry of group XVI elements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Media and reagents.Chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA), or VWR Scientific (West Chester, PA) and were of the highest grade available. All growth media were based on Luria-Bertani (LB) broth which contains the following, per liter: 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 5 g NaCl. A previously described trace element solution (49) was added to the medium at 1 ml liter−1. The medium was solidified with 1.5% (wt/vol) agar (biotech grade; Fisher Scientific) for colony isolation and streaking. All growth on plates was carried out at room temperature, while liquid cultures were grown at 30°C with shaking at 250 rpm.

Isolation and growth of strains.An optimized medium, called LB-marine, contained the following, per liter: 2.0 g tryptone, 1.0 g yeast extract, 12.5 g sodium chloride, and 1 ml of trace element solution. This mixture was adjusted to pH 8.1, 1.5% (wt/vol) agar was added for plates when desired, and then the mixture was autoclaved for 15 min at 121°C. After cooling, 20 ml of sterile 1 M magnesium sulfate was added per liter of medium prior to pouring plates or inoculating liquid cultures. A 0.22-μm-filter-sterilized 10 mg ml−1 stock of sodium tellurite was added to the media to achieve a final concentration of 150 μg ml−1 (0.7 mM) for the selection of resistant strains.

Mud samples, from the upper 2 cm of sediment, were collected from fringing salt marsh bordering the Indian River inlet in Rehoboth Beach, DE, in May of 2004. The mud samples were slurried 1:10 (vol/vol) in 0.45-μm-filter-sterilized water collected at the sampling site, transported to the laboratory, and stored under air at room temperature without shaking. Enrichment for tellurite-resistant organisms was performed by amending slurries with 150 μg Na2TeO3 ml−1.

Strains were isolated from primary dilutions of the slurries on LB-marine plates both in the presence and absence of 150 μg Na2TeO3 ml−1. Single tellurite-resistant colonies were purified by restreaking until a single colony morphology was consistently obtained. Purified strains were grown in liquid medium, and frozen glycerol stocks were prepared for long-term storage (5) at −70°C. Strains were revived from glycerol stocks by streaking onto LB-marine agar with tellurite.

Tellurite resistance determination.Tellurite resistance was assessed by growing each strain in LB-marine medium in the absence of tellurite and by quantifying their ability to grow on LB-marine agar containing tellurite. Cell concentrations in liquid cultures were determined by direct counting using a Hausser counting chamber (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Cultures were diluted to a concentration of ∼2 × 103 cells ml−1 in LB-marine medium, and 100 μl of this suspension (∼200 CFU) was spread onto LB-marine agar without amendment (control) or containing concentrations of Na2TeO3 ranging from 75 to 1,200 μg ml−1 (0 to 5.4 mM) and was incubated for at least 2 weeks to allow for the observation of slow-growing colonies.

Gram staining.Gram stains of culture or colony smears were performed with commercial reagents (Protocol Gram stain set; VWR, West Chester, PA) according to manufacturer instructions. Stained samples were observed on an Olympus (Central Valley, PA) BX61 microscope equipped with a UApo/340 40× objective.

rRNA gene amplification and sequence analysis.Genes encoding 16S/18S rRNA from individual isolates were amplified by PCR using the universal primer pair 519F-1406R (46). Amplified products were cloned into the pCR2.1 plasmid vector by using a commercial kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and were used to transform Escherichia coli TOP10 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by electroporation. White colonies on LB plates containing 50 μg kanamycin ml−1 were screened for inserts by PCR with M13-Reverse and T7-Promoter primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Two clones for each strain were sequenced by standard protocols, using the same primers, at the University of Delaware Sequencing and Genotyping Center. Sequences were compared with the Vector NTI program suite (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to generate a consensus contig using the Contig Express module.

Sequence alignments were carried out in MEGA3 (31) using the Clustal W algorithm. The phylogenetic trees produced from the resulting distance matrices were analyzed by neighbor joining with bootstrapping (1,000 replicates) using the Kimura 2-parameter correction method.

Quantification of solid and dissolved tellurium species.Tellurium content in liquid and solid phases of samples was determined using a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA) model 3300 atomic absorption spectrometer equipped with a graphite furnace accessory HGA-600 (graphite furnace-atomic absorption spectrometry) and an autosampler. A hollow cathode lamp was employed as the emission source at 214.3 nm with a slit width of 2 nm and 30 mA lamp current. Measurements were performed in peak area (integrated absorbance) mode. Tubes with pyrolytic graphite coating were used throughout the experiments. High-purity argon was used as the internal gas. The temperature-time program was performed according to Shiue et al. (45). The formation of tellurium oxides TeO (g) during pyrolysis can lead to analyte losses (40). To overcome this issue, a 20-μl aliquot of the sample (i.e., 0.5 to 2 ng Te) was injected into the furnace, followed by 20 μl of palladium (30 μg ml−1, i.e., 0.6 μg Pd) mixed with magnesium (200 μg ml−1; i.e., 4 μg Mg) matrix modifier. With these techniques, a linear range was found between 0 and 16 μM Te (0 to 2 μg ml−1) by using a commercially prepared standard solution (Aldrich Chemical, Milwaukee, WI) in 5% (vol/vol) HNO3.

For each sample, culture was centrifuged (9,000 × g, 25 min) and supernatant transferred to a Teflon beaker, where it was evaporated to dryness at 90 to 95°C. The residue was dissolved with high-purity, sub-boiled HNO3, dried at 90 to 95°C, and redissolved in 5% (vol/vol) HNO3. The cell pellet from the centrifugation described above was resuspended with Te-free medium and collected again by centrifugation. When this wash supernatant was analyzed as described above, the tellurium was less than 1% of that measured in the original supernatant. Pellets were dissolved with sub-boiled HNO3, dried as described above, and redissolved in 5% (vol/vol) HNO3. Samples from the supernatant or pellet were diluted by factors ranging from 5- to 210-fold in order to obtain tellurium concentrations between 25 and 100 ppb. Samples containing no added tellurium were analyzed with each batch of samples to estimate the level of potential contamination introduced by lab operations. In all cases, these were indistinguishable from the background level.

Detection of volatile tellurium species by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).The headspace above cultures was sampled with a manual solid-phase microextraction (SPME) holder using a 75-μm carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Cultures (2 ml) amended with tellurite were grown in sealed 18-ml headspace vials (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) under room air for sampling. The fiber was exposed to the headspace over the liquid cultures amended with tellurite for 48 h. The fiber was then retracted and removed from the vial and immediately inserted into the injection port of a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA) 6850 gas chromatograph coupled with a Hewlett-Packard 5973 mass selective detector (electron impact). A 0.75-mm inner-diameter liner and predrilled thermogreen septa for SPME were used. Ultra-high-purity helium was the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. An Agilent HP-5ms (5% phenylmethylpolysiloxane; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) column was used. All samples were analyzed under splitless injection with a desorption time of 10 s at an injector temperature of 280°C. Reinserting the SPME fiber after the run did not show any carryover. The GC oven was thus kept at 25°C (room temperature) for 3 min after desorption and then heated to 200°C with a ramp of 5°C/min. The final temperature was held for 2 min. The interface and the ion source temperatures were 280°C.

Compounds were identified by matching their mass spectra to the NIST and Wiley spectral libraries, requiring a resemblance percentage above 85% for identification. Commercial standards of dimethyl telluride (DMTe) and dimethyl ditelluride (DMDTe) are unavailable. However, the natural isotopic abundance of tellurium makes Te-containing fragments clearly identifiable in MS. The peaks of DMTe and DMDTe appeared after a retention time of approximately 2.5 to 3.7 and 16.6 to 19.3 min, respectively. To validate the elution time of DMTe, a >98% pure standard was synthesized from trimethyl telluronium iodide after the work by Kuhn et al. (30).

Localization of precipitated tellurium.Culture samples were observed by phase-contrast microscopy on an Olympus (Central Valley, PA) BX61 microscope equipped with a UPlan Fl 40× Ph2 objective and phase condenser. Images were acquired with a Retiga EXi charge-coupled-device camera (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada) and stored as TIFF files.

Cells from cultures were harvested by centrifugation and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Na cacodylate (primary fixative) and 1% OsO4 (secondary fixative). Resin infiltration was carried out with Embed-812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Blocks were sectioned on a Reichert-Jung ultra-cut E microtome (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL) with a diamond knife. Thin sections were approximately 60 to 70 nm (silver interference color) and were collected on copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). The sections were poststained with uranyl acetate and methanol as well as Reynolds' lead citrate (44). The samples were viewed using a Zeiss (Goettingen, Germany) CEM 902 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV, and images taken with a Soft Imaging system mega view II camera (Olympus Soft Imaging, Lakewood, CO).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The rRNA gene sequences reported here have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU405881 to EU405886.

RESULTS

Isolation of marine tellurite-resistant bacteria.The effect of medium composition on the recovery of culturable microbes from collected salt marsh sediments was assessed by systematically altering the basic recipe for LB broth to optimize it for use with salt marsh sediments. The total amount of tryptone plus yeast extract, in a 2:1 (wt/wt) ratio, varied between 1.5 g liter−1 and 30 g liter−1, with the peak number of strains recovered at 3.0 g liter−1. Sodium chloride varied between 85 mM and 428 mM, with consistently improved culturability observed above 171 mM. Magnesium sulfate was added to the medium up to 80 mM, with the optimum at 20 mM. The initial pH of the medium varied between 7.2 and 8.7, with the optimum at 8.1. The addition of 1 ml liter−1 of a standard trace element solution afforded a 1.2-fold increase in strain recovery over basal LB broth. In general, optimizing each parameter provided a 1.2- to 2.0-fold improvement over basal LB broth. Optimized LB-marine contained, per liter, 2.0 g tryptone, 1.0 g yeast extract, 214 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM MgSO4, and 1 ml liter−1 of trace element solution at a pH of 8.1.

The total culturable population of aerobic microbes recovered on LB-marine medium in the absence of tellurite, selection averaged 1.2 × 104 CFU ml−1 in 1:10 sediment slurries indicating a culturable population of 1.2 × 105 CFU per milliliter of original sediment. The total number of tellurite (0.70 mM)-resistant organisms recovered was 9.0 × 102 CFU ml−1 in sediment slurries, indicating an initial population size of 9.0 × 103 CFU ml−1 tellurite-resistant strains in the original sediment. Thus, ∼8% of the total culturable population was found to be tellurite resistant. Enrichment with 0.70 mM tellurite in sediment slurries for periods of up to 2 weeks increased the proportion of tellurite-resistant strains twofold, to ∼15% of the total culturable microbial population (data not shown).

When isolated strains from LB-marine medium without tellurite were inoculated on plates containing 150 μg Na2TeO3 ml−1 (0.70 mM), 8% of these strains were found to be tellurite resistant, duplicating the original fraction of tellurite resistance observed in the initial isolation experiment. All tellurite-resistant strains from the original isolation grew in the absence of tellurite and maintained their tellurite resistance. A total of 30 strains were purified by repeated streaking of isolated colonies on LB-marine medium plus tellurite and carried forward for characterization.

Characterization of tellurite-resistant strains.Tellurite-resistant isolates were grouped initially on the basis of colony morphology and subsequently characterized for their tellurite resistance range on LB-marine plates (Table 1). Based on these two criteria, the 30 isolates could be divided into three clusters. Six representative model strains from these clusters were carried forward to further examine their properties (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Clustering of tellurite-resistant isolates based on isolate properties

Cluster 1 is composed of highly tellurite-resistant isolates (Fig. 1A) that form compact, nonspreading rose-pink colonies. On plates containing tellurite, these colonies are dark black in color. Cluster 2 is composed of isolates that display moderate tellurite resistance (Fig. 1B). These organisms have variable colony morphology. One of the model strains for this cluster, strain 6A, forms moderately sized, white colonies with a fungal appearance. In contrast, strain 28A forms large, shiny, pale-orange colonies in the absence of tellurite and gray to black minute colonies in the presence of tellurite. Cluster 3 is composed of isolates that display relatively weak tellurite resistance (Fig. 1C). Even though strain 14B, the cluster 3 model strain, was isolated in the presence of 0.70 mM Na2TeO3, it grows poorly at this concentration both on plates and in liquid cultures. Therefore, this strain was routinely propagated in the presence of 0.17 mM Na2TeO3. Colonies grown without tellurite are buff colored or white. In the presence of tellurite, colony sizes are greatly diminished, and colonies were colored slightly gray. Liquid cultures of this strain tend to grow as gelatinous aggregates, rather than as dispersed cultures typical of the other isolates.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Resistance of model strains cultured in the absence of tellurite to various concentrations of sodium tellurite on LB-marine plates. Approximately 200 CFU were seeded onto each plate, and the viable population observed on LB-marine plates without tellurite was defined as 100% viability. (A) Cluster 1 strains 1A, 13B, and 30B. (B) Cluster 2 strains 6A and 28A. (C) Cluster 3 strain 14B. Symbols for each strain are noted in the figure. Data points are the average of the results for two independent experiments for each strain.

All tellurite-resistant strains isolated to date in this study stained gram positive. Isolated colonies recovered on LB-marine medium in the absence of tellurite selection contained both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms with nearly equal frequencies (data not shown). Thus, it appears that a specific subset of gram-positive organisms was identified by tellurite selection and that the gram-negative organisms in the upper sediment layers sampled were not tellurite resistant under the conditions tested. Strains in all clusters were also resistant to 0.70 mM tellurate, selenate, selenite, arsenate, and arsenite under aerobic growth conditions (data not shown).

Taxonomic assignment of isolates.A ca.-900-bp fragment of rRNA genes was PCR amplified from each of the six model strains in Table 1, cloned, and sequenced. Comparison of cluster 1 rRNA gene sequences to those in known databases indicated that these strains are all eukaryotes similar (98.8 to 99.8% identity) to the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, strains of which are frequently isolated from marine and estuarine sediments (22, 34) (Fig. 2A). Comparison of rRNA gene sequences from the isolates within clusters 2 and 3 unambiguously identified them as members of the family Bacillaceae, order Bacillales of the class Bacilli within the phylum Firmicutes of gram-positive bacteria (Fig. 2B). Cluster 2 strains were most similar (99.6 to 99.7% identity) to various uncharacterized marine Bacillus isolates (23). The cluster 3 strain 14B was most similar (99.2% identity) to strains of Bacillus halodenitrificans (syn. Virgibacillus halodenitrificans [53] and Oceanobacillus iheyensis [37]). None of the strains closely related to those identified here have been reported as being resistant to tellurium, selenium, or arsenic oxyanions.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Taxonomic affiliations of tellurite-resistant strains characterized in this study. Isolates from this study are indicated by their cluster and strain number in boldface text. Individual sequences are noted by their GenBank identifier, and strains isolated from marine environments are noted in italics. Major clades aside from those containing tellurite-resistant strains have been collapsed for clarity. Bootstrap support from 1,000 replicates is indicated at each node. Scale bars indicate the numbers of substitutions per site. (A) Combined 16S/18S rRNA gene sequence tree including isolates from cluster 1. (B) Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence tree including isolates from clusters 2 and 3.

Volatilization of tellurium by isolated strains.The hypothesis that tellurite resistance is linked with tellurite volatilization was tested in the model strains by GC-MS analysis of headspace gas samples (Fig. 3). DMTe was the most-abundant volatile tellurium species detected, followed by DMDTe and the mixed species dimethyltellurenyl sulfide (DMTeS) (Fig. 3A). The identity of all putative Te compounds was verified by detailed mass-spectral analysis to ensure that they displayed previously observed fragmentation patterns characteristic of organotellurium compounds (Fig. 3B). GC-MS analysis of the headspace above sterile controls did not detect any volatile tellurium species (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Representative SPME-GC-MS analysis of the headspace above cluster 1 strain 13B cultured for 48 h. The total ion count trace (A) indicates the relative proportions of each species detected. The detailed mass spectrum for DMTe (B) displays the characteristic signature expected based on Te isotope natural abundance and fractionation patterns resulting from the loss of methyl groups.

The ability of strains to produce a suite of volatile compounds was assayed at time points ranging from 2 days to 5 weeks of time in culture. All strains tested produced volatile sulfur compounds, while only strains in clusters 1 and 2 produced volatile tellurium compounds (Table 2). Dimethyldisulfide was detected in nearly every sample analyzed between 48 h and 5 weeks of growth. Dimethylsulfide (DMS) and dimethyltrisulfide were also detected with somewhat lower frequency. In cluster 1 and 2 strains, DMTe was more abundant than any of the volatile sulfur compounds detected (Fig. 3A). Generally, cluster 1 strains appeared to be most proficient at both S and Te volatilizations, as judged by the variety of compounds produced and the frequency of detection of these compounds over 5 weeks of culture.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Production of alkylated volatile species by model strainsa

Comparing clusters 1 and 2, two of three cluster 1 strains produced DMDTe, while this compound was not observed in headspace samples above cultures of cluster 2 isolates. The mixed species DMTeS was also observed frequently in cluster 1 strains but less frequently in cluster 2 strains. This is likely due to the timing of Te volatilization and relative activities of cluster 1 versus those of cluster 2. As shown in Fig. 4 for DMTe, volatile Te species were observed at all times in cluster 1 strains (Fig. 4A), with a peak abundance at 2 weeks. In contrast, volatile tellurium species were only observed after 5 weeks of culture in cluster 2 strains (Fig. 4B). Cluster 1 strains also produced between 5- and 20-fold greater amounts of volatile Te compounds than did cluster 2 strains, as can be seen by comparing the axis limits in Fig. 4. While the SPME-GC-MS analysis was not quantitative in absolute terms, relative abundances can be determined as all samples were treated identically.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Time course of DMTe production by strains from clusters 1 (A) and 2 (B). Relative amounts of DMTe in each headspace sample were determined by SPME-GC-MS analysis after 48 h, 2 weeks, or 5 weeks of culture. Note that the scale of the y axis in panel B is 100-fold lower than that of panel A. Data points are the average of the results for two independent cultures per strain for each time point.

Within cluster 1, strain 30B behaved somewhat differently from strains 1A and 13B, as it consistently failed to produce DMDTe. DMS, dimethyltrisulfide, and DMTeS were less frequently observed in this strain (Table 2). In addition, while the temporal pattern of DMTe levels peaked after 2 weeks of culture in all cluster 1 strains, strain 30B produced three- to fivefold smaller amounts of volatile Te compounds than did the other two strains in this cluster.

The facts that no volatile Te compounds were detected in the headspace above the cluster 3 strain 14B and that DMDTe was observed only with cluster 1 strains indicate that the production of DMTe and DMDTe is biologically mediated. If abiotic chemical reactions were responsible, similar types and amounts of compounds should have been observed in all cultures. Furthermore, no volatile Te compounds were observed in the headspace above sterile medium incubated under identical conditions (See Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

Cell-associated, particulate Te is the major product of Te metabolism by the isolates.As SPME-GC-MS analysis did not allow a direct determination of the amount of Te volatilized by each strain, we sought to determine the maximum possible amount of Te in volatile species by measuring Te in the soluble and particulate fractions after various times in culture (Fig. 5). The amount of volatilized Te was then obtained by subtraction from the amount of Te initially added into each culture. In each case, the soluble and particulate Te was found to account for nearly all the added Te. Total recovery of Te in the soluble and particulate fractions ranged from 80 to 110% of the amended Te in any given measurement, with a mean of 95% ± 6%. Cluster 1 strains appear to be more efficient at precipitating Te, converting ∼98% of added Te to a particulate form (Fig. 5A), while cluster 2 and 3 strains converted only 30 to 40% of added Te to a particulate form (Fig. 5B and C) over 5 weeks of culture. While it is possible that some of the soluble Te observed was a dissolved alkyl species, the total amount of alkylated Te species is likely much less than 5% of the total tellurite converted by these strains.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Recoveries of soluble and particulate Te in model strains for each cluster. The concentration of Te in each fraction was determined by graphite furnace-atomic absorption spectrometry. A total of 0.65 mM TeO32− was added to cultures of strains 13B (cluster 1) (A) and 28A (cluster 2) (B), while the culture of strain 14B received 0.16 mM TeO32− (cluster 3) (C), denoted by the dashed lines in each panel. Dark bars denote tellurium recovered as precipitates; light bars represent tellurium recovered in the liquid and are the mean of four measurements (± the standard deviation).

Cellular localization of particulate Te.To determine the localization of Te particulates, cultures were examined directly by phase-contrast microscopy to determine if they were producing extracellular crystalline materials, but no significant amounts were observed in any of the strains (data not shown). Thin sections of fixed cells were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and strains in all clusters were found to contain electron-dense bodies that were present only when strains were cultured in the presence of tellurite (Fig. 6). Generally, these electron-dense bodies were found evenly distributed throughout the cell sections. This lack of distinct localization indicates that the Te is precipitated intracellularly without any obvious membrane association. Strain 28A in cluster 2 was the exception to this rule, as it tended to form precipitates in regions close to the cell periphery, suggesting that the tellurium-precipitating activity in this strain is membrane associated.

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Localization of precipitated Te in model strains from each cluster. Representative TEM images are displayed for model strains grown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of tellurite. Images are arranged in rows, with the strain indicated at the left edge of each row and the growth condition noted at the top of each column. A sevenfold-magnified subsection (indicated by a white box) of the +TeO32− image for each strain is shown to highlight the different types of precipitates produced by each strain.

Strains appeared to produce different shapes and sizes of precipitates. Cluster 1 strains generally formed clusters of short needles of <100 nm in length, though individual cells sometimes contained clusters over 300 nm in length. As an aside, the images of strain 13 support the eukaryotic affiliation of cluster 1 strains inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequencing, as nuclei and mitochondria were clearly distinguishable in most sections. Strains in cluster 2 displayed more variability in the Te precipitate structure. Strain 6A formed spheres and amorphous aggregates that ranged from <10 to >50 nm in diameter. In contrast, strain 28A precipitates were primarily observed as aggregates of needles at the cell periphery a few hundred nanometers in length. Precipitates produced by the cluster 3 strain 14B were less electron dense and less compact than those of other strains. This may be due to the relatively low tellurite levels (0.18 mM) required for the growth of strain 14B in liquid culture and the tendency of this strain to aggregate in culture. Aggregation may protect cells by exclusion of tellurite leading to lower intracellular concentrations for precipitation.

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated that aerobic marine microbes including yeasts of the genus Rhodotorula and bacterial strains of the order Bacillales are the dominant culturable tellurite-resistant microbes in salt marsh sediments. Our initial expectation was that a range of gram-negative organisms would dominate, as Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria are the dominant tellurite-resistant groups isolated from other marine samples (43, 51, 54) and the tellurite resistance literature is primarily based on gram-negative model systems (13, 47). However, all isolates obtained in this study stained gram positive. Gram-positive microbes also appear to dominate isolations carried out under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions (data not shown).

The total number of tellurite-resistant microbes observed in the salt marsh sample was similar to that observed elsewhere, ∼10% of the total culturable microbial population (42, 47). Under aerobic conditions, the new isolates converted tellurite to alkylated species that accumulated in the headspace above sealed cultures. These strains also alkylated and volatilized sulfur compounds and produced the mixed species DMTeS. To the best of our knowledge, the variety of compounds observed here is unprecedented for yeast or gram-positive bacteria and is also the first demonstration of volatile sulfur compound production by a member of the order Bacillales. Gram-positive bacteria of the family Nocardiaceae have been associated with the dimethylsulfoniopropionate-dependent production of DMS in freshwater riverine sediments (52). The strains here produced DMS without added dimethylsulfoniopropionate, suggesting that other organic compounds in the presence of sulfate can contribute to DMS production by aerobic organisms present in salt marsh sediments. The production of volatile sulfur and tellurium compounds appears to be positively correlated with tellurite resistance. Cluster 1 strains are highly tellurite resistant and produce the largest quantities and variety of volatile species. Cluster 2 strains are demonstrably less tellurite resistant than those in cluster 1, do not produce DMDTe, and were weaker DMTe producers. Finally, the cluster 3 strain studied is weakly tellurite resistant and produced no tellurium containing volatiles.

The volatilization of Te and S by the isolates described here suggests that the marine bacilli and yeasts may play a previously unrecognized role in the biogeochemistry of the group XVI elements, specifically contributing to their transfer from the marine and estuarine environments to the atmosphere. While this may seem counterintuitive given the low percentage of tellurite converted to volatile species in our experiments, it is useful to consider marine sulfur cycling. Sulfate is the major anion in seawater occurring at a concentration of ∼28 mM and is the source of sulfur in DMS, a major form of sulfur exported to the atmosphere from marine systems (27). The production and consumption of DMS is controlled by the interplay of microbial groups in the marine environment (27). DMS occurs at a global weighted average concentration of 102 ng per liter (1.6 nM) in seawater (3) or ∼0.000005% of the 28 mM starting sulfate pool. Atmospheric DMS concentrations are in a similar range, 0.03 to 6 ppb volume (2, 50). Yet, these low DMS concentrations are sufficient to modulate climate by promoting cloud formation (25) and are responsible for the export of teragrams (1012 g) of sulfur to the atmosphere (27), demonstrating that low concentrations and low apparent fluxes integrated over wide areas can have biogeochemically significant consequences.

Particulate Te nanostructures were a major product of tellurite metabolism in the strongly tellurite-resistant isolates in clusters 1 and 2. Indeed, cluster 1 strains converted 98% of supplied Te to the particulate form in 5 weeks. This attribute appears similar to the recently described capability of S. barnesii and B. selenitireducens to produce cell-associated Te nanoparticles when using tellurite as a terminal electron acceptor for the respiration of lactate under anaerobic conditions (6). However, the isolates described here differ from S. barnesii and B. selenitireducens in two major ways. First, all isolates described here precipitate tellurium under aerobic conditions. Attempts to grow these strains anaerobically on lactate, succinate, malate, and citrate with tellurite as the electron acceptor have failed, as have attempts to grow these organisms fermentatively in LB-marine medium or in LB-marine-supplemented nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor (data not shown). This suggests that tellurite cannot be utilized by these strains as a terminal electron acceptor. Second, with the exception of strain 28A in which some precipitates may have extended beyond the plasma membrane (data not shown), the strains described here appear to accumulate particulate Te intracellularly rather than extracellularly. The observation that different strains appear to produce tellurite precipitates of different shapes suggests that it may be possible to tailor crystal growth properties to a given application once the mechanisms driving precipitate shape are understood.

The isolates described here precipitate greater quantities of tellurium than do representative gram-negative bacteria. For example, Basnayake et al. observed a 34% conversion of 0.1 mM tellurite to solid Te by Pseudomonas fluorescens K27 (8). For comparison, cluster 1 strains converted 95% of 0.70 mM tellurite, while cluster 2 and 3 strains removed 30 to 35% of 0.70 mM or 0.18 mM tellurite, respectively. The extent of tellurite precipitation was positively correlated with tellurite resistance. Highly resistant cluster 1 strains precipitated the greatest fraction of tellurite supplied, while the weakly resistant cluster 3 strain studied precipitated ∼10-fold less tellurite than did the cluster 1 strains while growing at 4-fold-lower tellurite concentrations. Compared with anaerobic tellurite precipitation by B. selenitireducens, which removed a total applied dose of 5.5 mM tellurite when it was provided in multiple low concentration pulses, the strains described here were less efficient. However, efficiency may improve if we employ a similar pulsed dose scheme, as lower concentrations of tellurite resulted in much more rapid accumulation of particulate Te in the strains described here (∼65% of 0.1 mM tellurite precipitated in 48 h), as will be reported elsewhere.

The production of alkylated metalloids by the microbial strains noted here is of concern for two reasons. The first is the toxicity associated with these compounds if these organisms are employed for the commercial production of Te nanoparticles as suggested by Baesman et al. (6). Tellurium nanoparticles are attracting considerable interest because of their semiconductor and fluorescence properties (CdTe quantum dots) (7, 9, 12, 21, 28). “Green” chemical principles have been developed for the synthetic manufacture of these materials (38), and an important consideration for green technologies is the generation of toxic side products of synthetic reactions, like the DMTe, DMDTe, and DMTeS species documented here. While not measured, it is likely that B. selenitireducens and S. barnesii also produce these compounds.

The second major concern is the ability of these strains to volatilize other metalloids like polonium, a group XVI element commonly found in nuclear waste and tailings from uranium and phosphate mining operations as part of the U decay series (4, 24, 36). Bacteria have been implicated in polonium mobilization from phosphate mineral deposits into groundwater and proposed as a remedial strategy for contaminated groundwater (14, 32). As closely related Bacillus and Rhodotorula spp. are likely to be ubiquitous in estuarine and marine sediments (23), significant potential exists for dispersal of radioactive materials from accidental releases.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (OCE-0425199) and utilized common equipment provided in part by grant P20-RR116472-04 from the National Institutes of Health.

We thank John Dykins of the Chemistry/Biochemistry Mass Spectrometry Facility for his assistance in developing the analyses presented here and Shannon Modla and Kirk Czymmek of the DBI BioImaging Center for providing TEM services. GC-ICP-MS analyses were kindly provided by David Amoroux and Emmanuel Tessier of the University de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, France.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 March 2008.
    • Accepted 2 October 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Andreae, M. O. 1984. Determination of inorganic tellurium species in natural waters. Anal. Chem.56:2064-2066.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Andreae, M. O., T. W. Andreae, D. Meyerdierks, and C. Thiel. 2003. Marine sulfur cycling and the atmospheric aerosol over the springtime North Atlantic. Chemosphere52:1321-1343.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Andreae, M. O., and H. Raemdonck. 1983. Dimethyl sulfide in the surface ocean and the marine atmosphere—a global view. Science221:744-747.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Andrews, J. N., D. J. Ford, N. Hussain, D. Trivedi, and M. J. Youngman. 1989. Natural radioelement solution by circulating groundwaters in the Stripa granite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta53:1791-1802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1987. Current protocols in molecular biology. Green Publishing Associates & Wiley Interscience, New York, NY.
  6. 6.↵
    Baesman, S. M., T. D. Bullen, J. Dewald, D. Zhang, S. Curran, F. S. Islam, T. J. Beveridge, and R. S. Oremland. 2007. Formation of tellurium nanocrystals during anaerobic growth of bacteria that use Te oxyanions as respiratory electron acceptors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:2135-2143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Bailey, R. E., J. B. Strausburg, and S. Nie. 2004. A new class of far-red and near-infrared biological labels based on alloyed semiconductor quantum dots. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.4:569-574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Basnayake, R. S. T., J. H. Bius, O. M. Akpolat, and T. G. Chasteen. 2001. Production of dimethyl telluride and elemental tellurium by bacteria amended with tellurite or tellurate. Appl. Organomet. Chem.15:499-510.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Batabyal, S. K., C. Basu, A. R. Das, and G. S. Sanyal. 2006. Nanorods of tellurium: synthesis and self-assembly. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.6:719-725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Bentley, R., and T. G. Chasteen. 2002. Microbial methylation of metalloids: arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.66:250-271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Borsetti, F., R. Borghese, F. Francia, M. R. Randi, S. Fedi, and D. Zannoni. 2003. Reduction of potassium tellurite to elemental tellurium and its effect on the plasma membrane redox components of the facultative phototroph Rhodobacter capsulatus. Protoplasma221:153-161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Chalmers, N. I., R. J. Palmer, Jr., L. Du-Thumm, R. Sullivan, W. Shi, and P. E. Kolenbrander. 2007. Use of quantum dot luminescent probes to achieve single-cell resolution of human oral bacteria in biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:630-636.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Chasteen, T. G., and R. Bentley. 2003. Biomethylation of selenium and tellurium: microorganisms and plants. Chem. Rev.103:1-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Cherrier, J., W. C. Burnett, and P. A. Larock. 1995. Uptake of polonium and sulfur by bacteria. Geomicrobiol. J.13:103-115.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Chiong, M., E. Gonzalez, R. Barra, and C. Vasquez. 1988. Purification and biochemical characterization of tellurite-reducing activities from Thermus thermophilus HB8. J. Bacteriol.170:3269-3273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Cournoyer, B., S. Watanabe, and A. Vivian. 1998. A tellurite-resistance genetic determinant from phytopathogenic pseudomonads encodes a thiopurine methyltransferase: evidence of a widely-conserved family of methyltransferases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1397:161-168.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Csotonyi, J. T., E. Stackebrandt, and V. Yurkov. 2006. Anaerobic respiration on tellurate and other metalloids in bacteria from hydrothermal vent fields in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72:4950-4956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Favre-Bonté, S., L. Ranjard, L. Champier, B. Cournoyer, and S. Nazaret. 2006. Distribution and genetic diversity of bacterial thiopurine methyltransferases in soils emitting dimethyl selenide. Biochimie88:1573-1581.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Favre-Bonté, S., L. Ranjard, C. Colinon, C. Prigent-Combaret, S. Nazaret, and B. Cournoyer. 2005. Freshwater selenium-methylating bacterial thiopurine methyltransferases: diversity and molecular phylogeny. Environ. Microbiol.7:153-164.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Feldmann, J., and A. V. Hirner. 1995. Occurrence of volatile metal and metalloid species in landfill and sewage gases. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem.60:339-359.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Fountaine, T. J., S. M. Wincovitch, D. H. Geho, S. H. Garfield, and S. Pittaluga. 2006. Multispectral imaging of clinically relevant cellular targets in tonsil and lymphoid tissue using semiconductor quantum dots. Mod. Pathol.19:1181-1191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Gadanho, M., and J. P. Sampaio. 2005. Occurrence and diversity of yeasts in the mid-Atlantic ridge hydrothermal fields near the Azores Archipelago. Microb. Ecol.50:408-417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Gontang, E. A., W. Fenical, and P. R. Jensen. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity of gram-positive bacteria cultured from marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:3272-3282.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Harada, K., W. C. Burnett, and P. A. Larock. 1989. Polonium in Florida groundwater and its possible relationship to the sulfur cycle and bacteria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta53:143-150.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Hegg, D. A., R. J. Ferek, P. V. Hobbs, and L. F. Radke. 1991. Dimethyl sulfide and cloud condensation nucleus correlations in the northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.96:13189-13191.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Hein, J. R., A. Koschinsky, and A. N. Halliday. 2003. Global occurrence of tellurium-rich ferromanganese crusts and a model for the enrichment of tellurium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta67:1117-1127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Howard, E. C., J. R. Henriksen, A. Buchan, C. R. Reisch, H. Buergmann, R. Welsh, W. Y. Ye, J. M. Gonzalez, K. Mace, S. B. Joye, R. P. Kiene, W. B. Whitman, and M. A. Moran. 2006. Bacterial taxa that limit sulfur flux from the ocean. Science314:649-652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Jayadevan, K. P., and T. Y. Tseng. 2005. One-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures as absorber layers in solar cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.5:1768-1784.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Kim, G., N. Hussain, and T. M. Church. 2000. Excess Po-210 in the coastal atmosphere. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol.52:74-80.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Kuhn, N., P. Faupel, and E. Zauder. 1986. A simple process for the synthesis of [Eme3]1 and Eme2 (E=Se,Te). J. Organomet. Chem.302:C4-C6.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinform.5:150-163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    LaRock, P., J. H. Hyun, S. Boutelle, W. C. Burnett, and C. D. Hull. 1996. Bacterial mobilization of polonium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta60:4321-4328.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Lee, D. S., and J. M. Edmond. 1985. Tellurium species in seawater. Nature313:782-785.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    Libkind, D., M. Gadanho, M. van Broock, and J. P. Sampalo. 2008. Studies on the heterogeneity of the carotenogenic yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa from Patagonia, Argentina. J. Basic Microbiol.48:93-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Liu, M., R. J. Turner, T. L. Winstone, A. Saetre, M. Dyllick-Brenzinger, G. Jickling, L. W. Tari, J. H. Weiner, and D. E. Taylor. 2000. Escherichia coli TehB requires S-adenosylmethionine as a cofactor to mediate tellurite resistance. J. Bacteriol.182:6509-6513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Livingston, H. D., and D. L. Schneider. 1984. Annual status report—radiochemical studies in support of the low level waste ocean disposal programme. WHOI report prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, MA.
  37. 37.↵
    Lu, J., Y. Nogi, and H. Takami. 2001. Oceanobacillus iheyensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a deep-sea extremely halotolerant and alkaliphilic species isolated from a depth of 1050 m on the Iheya Ridge. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.205:291-297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Lu, Q. Y., F. Gao, and S. Komarneni. 2005. A green chemical approach to the synthesis of tellurium nanowires. Langmuir21:6002-6005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Michalke, K., E. B. Wickenheiser, M. Mehring, A. V. Hirner, and R. Hensel. 2000. Production of volatile derivatives of metal(loid)s by microflora involved in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66:2791-2796.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Muller-Vogt, G., M. Kubler, C. Lussac, W. Wendl, and P. Wurfel. 2000. Chemical reactions of tellurium in graphite tubes of atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc.55:501-508.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Pérez, J. M., I. L. Calderon, F. A. Arenas, D. E. Fuentes, G. A. Pradenas, E. L. Fuentes, J. M. Sandoval, M. E. Castro, A. O. Elias, and C. C. Vasquez. 2007. Bacterial toxicity of potassium tellurite: unveiling an ancient enigma. PLoS ONE2:e211.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    Rathgeber, C., N. Yurkova, E. Stackebrandt, J. T. Beatty, and V. Yurkov. 2002. Isolation of tellurite- and selenite-resistant bacteria from hydrothermal vents of the Juan de Fuca Ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68:4613-4622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Rathgeber, C., N. Yurkova, E. Stackebrandt, P. Schumann, E. Humphrey, J. T. Beatty, and V. Yurkov. 2006. Metalloid reducing bacteria isolated from deep ocean hydrothermal vents of the Juan de Fuca Ridge, Pseudoalteromonas telluritireducens sp. nov and Pseudoalteromonas spiralis sp. nov. Curr. Microbiol.53:449-456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Reynolds, E. S. 1963. Use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.17:208-212.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Shiue, M. Y., J. Mierzwa, and M. H. Yang. 2001. Mechanism of the action of palladium and palladium-magnesium nitrate modifiers used in the determination of tellurium by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom.16:1172-1179.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    Suzuki, M. T., and S. J. Giovannoni. 1996. Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:625-630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Taylor, D. E. 1999. Bacterial tellurite resistance. Trends Microbiol.7:111-115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Trutko, S. M., V. K. Akimenko, N. E. Suzina, L. A. Anisimova, M. G. Shlyapnikov, B. P. Baskunov, V. I. Duda, and A. M. Boronin. 2000. Involvement of the respiratory chain of gram-negative bacteria in the reduction of tellurite. Arch. Microbiol.173:178-186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Wahlund, T. M., C. R. Woese, R. W. Castenholz, and M. T. Madigan. 1991. A thermophilic green sulfur bacterium from New Zealand hot springs, Chlorobium tepidum sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol.156:81-90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Wingenter, O. W., K. B. Haase, P. Strutton, G. Friederich, S. Meinardi, D. R. Blake, and F. S. Rowland. 2004. Changing concentrations of CO, CH4, C5H8, CH3Br, CH3I, and dimethyl sulfide during the southern ocean iron enrichment experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101:8537-8541.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Yamada, A., N. Miyagishima, and T. Matsunaga. 1997. Tellurite removal by marine photosynthetic bacteria. J. Mar. Biotechnol.5:46-49.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Yoch, D. C., R. H. Carraway, R. Friedman, and N. Kulkarni. 2001. Dimethylsulfide (DMS) production from dimethylsulfoniopropionate by freshwater river sediments: phylogeny of gram-positive DMS-producing isolates. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.37:31-37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    Yoon, J. H., T. K. Oh, and Y. H. Park. 2004. Transfer of Bacillus halodenitrificans Denariaz et al. 1989 to the genus Virgibacillus as Virgibacillus halodenitrificans comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.54:2163-2167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Yurkov, V., J. Jappe, and A. Vermeglio. 1996. Tellurite resistance and reduction by obligately aerobic photosynthetic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:4195-4198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Zannoni, D., F. Borsetti, J. J. Harrison, and R. J. Turner. 2008. The bacterial response to the chalcogen metalloids Se and Te. Adv. Microb. Physiol.53:1-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Volatilization and Precipitation of Tellurium by Aerobic, Tellurite-Resistant Marine Microbes
Patrick R. L. Ollivier, Andrew S. Bahrou, Sarah Marcus, Talisha Cox, Thomas M. Church, Thomas E. Hanson
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2008, 74 (23) 7163-7173; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00733-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Volatilization and Precipitation of Tellurium by Aerobic, Tellurite-Resistant Marine Microbes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Volatilization and Precipitation of Tellurium by Aerobic, Tellurite-Resistant Marine Microbes
Patrick R. L. Ollivier, Andrew S. Bahrou, Sarah Marcus, Talisha Cox, Thomas M. Church, Thomas E. Hanson
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2008, 74 (23) 7163-7173; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00733-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillaceae
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Drug Resistance, Fungal
Rhodotorula
Tellurium
Water Microbiology
wetlands

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336