Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public Health Microbiology

Molecular Analysis as an Aid To Assess the Public Health Risk of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains

Brian K. Coombes, Mark E. Wickham, Mariola Mascarenhas, Samantha Gruenheid, B. Brett Finlay, Mohamed A. Karmali
Brian K. Coombes
1Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences and Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: coombes@mcmaster.ca
Mark E. Wickham
3Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariola Mascarenhas
2Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Gruenheid
4Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Brett Finlay
3Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed A. Karmali
2Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02566-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Genetic organization of disease-associated type III effector nle genes in non-O157 STEC. (A) Graphic representation of the O-Island PAIs containing the nle effector genes examined in the present study in O157:H7 STEC strain EDL933. The direction of transcription for each open reading frame is indicated by an arrowhead. The type III effector genes examined are color-coded to each O-Island. nleG9 is adjacent to OI-71 but separated by multiple transposase elements and was therefore not included as part of OI-71. The annotation of open reading frames within each O-Island was modified from Perna et al. (26). (B) Pairwise association of nle genes from O-Islands 122, 57, 36, and 71 in non-O157:H7 STEC strains linked to outbreaks. The data are P values (Fisher exact test) for the co-occurrence of each disease-associated nle gene within the linked O-Island. nle genes that did not associate with outbreaks or HUS by MRA (nleB2 and nleD) were not included in pairwise comparisons. *, not-significant co-occurrence in non-HUS-associated strains (data not shown).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Type III effector-gene dosage correlates with STEC virulence. (A) Distribution of nle gene content in O157 strains (n = 15) and non-O157 STEC strains (n = 57) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for strain details). All O157 strains examined (red) contain all of the nle genes presented in Table 1. Non-O157 strains linked to human disease (yellow, green, and blue) contain a variable repertoire of disease-associated nle genes. Seropathotype E STEC strains not associated with human disease (purple) contain fewer nle genes relative to strains that are associated with outbreaks and HUS (seropathotype B), HUS only (seropathotype C), and diarrhea (seropathotype D). The data shown are the percentage of strains positive for the number of nle genes within each seropathotype. (B) Prevalence of nle genes in O157 and non-O157 STEC strains. Epidemic non-O157 strains have a significantly higher nle gene content compared to strains not linked to epidemics. Similarly, HUS-associated non-O157 strains have a significantly higher nle gene content compared to non-HUS-associated strains. O157 STEC contains all disease-associated nle genes identified. The data are means with standard errors.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1.

    Oligonucleotides used for gene content analysis in non-O157 STEC

    Gene targetaOligonucleotide sequence (5′-3′)Product size (bp)Annealing temp (°C)
    PrimerPrimer 2
    nleA ATGAACATTCAACCGACCATACGACTCTTGTTTCTTGGATTATATCAAA1,29655
    nleB GGAAGTTTGTTTACAGAGACGAAAATGCCGCTTGATACC29755
    nleB2 GTTAATACTAAGCAGCATCCCCATATCAAGATAGATACACC47552
    nleC ACAGTCCAACTTCAACTTTTCCATCGTACCCAGCCTTTCG77755
    nleD GGTATTACATCAGTCATCAAGGTTGTGGAAAACATGGAGC42655
    nleE GTATAACCAGAGGAGTAGCGATCTTACAACAAATGTCC26052
    nleF ATGTTACCAACAAGTGGTTCTTCATCCACATTGTAAAGATCCTTTGTT56755
    nleG (Z6010)ATGTTATCGCCCTCTTCTATAAATACTTAATACTACACTAATAAGATCCA90255
    nleG2-1 (Z6025)ACCAGAAACCTGACTTCGCAGCATCTTCATATACTACAGC40655
    nleG2-3 (Z2149)GGATGGAACCATACCTGGCGCAATCAATTGCTAATGC55156
    nleG5-2 (Z2151)TGGAGGCTTTACGTCATGTCGCCGGAACAAAGGGTTCACG50455
    nleG6-2 (Z2150)CGGGTCAGTGGATGATATGAGCAAGTAGCATCTAGCGGTCGAGG42455
    nleG9 (Z2560)GTTCGTGCCCGAATTGTAGCCACCAACCAAACGAGAAAATG40955
    nleH1-2 (Z6021)AACGCCTTATATTTTACCAGCACAATTATCTCTTCC58952
    nleH1-1 (Z0989)GTTACCACCTTAAGTATCCGTTTCTCATGAACACTCC45655
    ent/espL2 GAATAACAATCACTCCTCACCTTACAGTGCCCGATTACG23355
    • ↵ a Designations in parentheses are alternate gene names used previously.

  • TABLE 2.

    Distribution of complete O-Islands in HUS strains

    Complete O-IslandPrevalence (%) within STEC group (no. of strains with O-Island/ total no. of strains)Odds ratio (95% CI)aP
    Non-HUS associatedHUS associated
    O-Island 367 (2/28)14 (4/29)2.1 (0.3-12.4)NSb
    O-Island 577 (2/28)41 (12/29)9.2 (1.8-46.3)<0.01
    O-Island 717 (2/28)45 (13/29)10.6 (2.1-53.1)<0.01
    O-Island 12232 (9/28)66 (19/29)4.0 (1.3-12.1)<0.05
    • ↵ a CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵ b NS, not significant.

  • TABLE 3.

    Distribution of complete O-Islands in outbreak strains

    Complete O-IslandPrevalence (%) within STEC group (no. of strains with O-Island/ total no. of strains)Odds ratio (95% CI)aP
    Non-outbreak associatedOutbreak associated
    O-Island 367 (3/42)20 (3/15)3.3 (0.6-18.3)NSb
    O-Island 5717 (7/42)46 (7/15)4.4 (1.2-16.0)<0.05
    O-Island 7111 (5/42)67 (10/15)14.8 (3.6-61.4)0.0001
    O-Island 12233 (14/42)93 (14/15)28 (3.3-235.2)<0.0001
    • ↵ a CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵ b NS, not significant.

  • TABLE 4.

    Prevalence of nle genes in non-O157 STEC strains associated with HUS

    GeneaPrevalence (%) within STEC group (no. of strains with O-Island/total no. of strains)Odds ratio (95% CI)bP
    Non-HUS associatedHUS associated
    nleA 32 (9/28)69 (20/29)4.7 (1.5-14.3)0.0081
    nleB 32 (9/28)69 (20/29)4.7 (1.5-14.3)0.0081
    nleB2 17 (5/28)24 (7/29)1.5 (0.4-5.3)NSc
    nleC 25 (7/28)62 (18/29)4.9 (1.6-15.3)0.0074
    nleD 7 (2/28)14 (4/29)2.1 (0.3-12.4)NS
    nleE 32 (9/28)66 (19/29)4.0 (1.3-12.1)0.0173
    nleF 32 (9/28)62 (18/29)3.5 (1.2-10.3)0.0343
    nleG (Z6010)11 (3/28)62 (18/29)13.6 (3.3-56.1)<0.0001
    nleG2-1 (Z6025)18 (5/28)62 (18/29)7.5 (2.2-25.6)0.0011
    nleG2-3 (Z2149)25 (7/28)66 (19/29)5.7 (1.8-18)0.0033
    nleG5-2 (Z2151)7 (2/28)41 (12/29)9.1 (1.8-46)0.0046
    nleG6-2 (Z2150)18 (5/28)52 (15/29)4.9 (1.5-16.5)0.0119
    nleG9 (Z2560)7 (2/28)45 (13/29)10.6 (2.1-53)0.002
    nleH1-2 (Z6021)32 (9/28)62 (18/29)3.5 (1.2-10.3)0.0343
    nleH1-1 (Z0989)32 (9/28)62 (18/29)3.5 (1/2-10.3)0.0343
    ent/espL2 32 (9/28)69 (20/29)4.7 (1.5-14.3)0.0081
    • ↵ a Designations in parentheses are alternate gene names used previously.

    • ↵ b CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵ c NS, not significant.

  • TABLE 5.

    Prevalence of nle genes in non-O157 STEC strains associated with outbreaks

    GeneaPrevalence (%) within STEC group (no. of strains with O-Island/ total no. of strains)Odds ratio (95% CI)bP
    Non-outbreak associatedOutbreak-associated
    nleA 33 (14/42)100 (15/15)61 (3.4-1,093)<0.0001
    nleB 33 (14/42)100 (15/15)61 (3.4-1,093)<0.0001
    nleB2 14 (6/42)40 (6/15)4 (1-15.4)NSc
    nleC 29 (12/42)87 (13/15)16 (3.2-83)0.0001
    nleD 7 (3/42)20 (3/15)3.3 (0.6-18.3)NS
    nleE 33 (14/42)93 (14/15)28 (3.3-235.2)<0.0001
    nleF 33 (14/42)87 (13/15)13 (2.6-65.8)0.0006
    nleG (Z6010)19 (8/42)87 (13/15)28 (5.2-147.7)<0.0001
    nleG2-1 (Z6025)24 (10/42)87 (13/15)21 (4-108.3)<0.0001
    nleG2-3 (Z2149)29 (12/42)93 (14/15)35 (4.1-296.6)<0.0001
    nleG5-2 (Z2151)17 (7/42)46 (7/15)4.4 (1.2-16)0.0344
    nleG6-2 (Z2150)24 (10/42)67 (10/15)6.4 (1.8-23.2)0.0046
    nleG9 (Z2560)11 (5/42)67 (10/15)14.8 (3.6-61.4)0.0001
    nleH1-2 (Z6021)33 (14/42)87 (13/15)13 (2.6-65.8)0.0006
    nleH1-1 (Z0989)31 (13/42)93 (14/15)31 (3.7-263.4)<0.0001
    ent/espL2 33 (14/42)100 (15/15)60.9 (3.4-1,093)<0.0001
    • ↵ a Designations in parentheses are alternate gene names used previously.

    • ↵ b CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵ c NS, not significant.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Strains used in this study (Table S1).
      Zipped MS Excel file 245K.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Molecular Analysis as an Aid To Assess the Public Health Risk of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains
Brian K. Coombes, Mark E. Wickham, Mariola Mascarenhas, Samantha Gruenheid, B. Brett Finlay, Mohamed A. Karmali
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2008, 74 (7) 2153-2160; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02566-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Analysis as an Aid To Assess the Public Health Risk of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Molecular Analysis as an Aid To Assess the Public Health Risk of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains
Brian K. Coombes, Mark E. Wickham, Mariola Mascarenhas, Samantha Gruenheid, B. Brett Finlay, Mohamed A. Karmali
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2008, 74 (7) 2153-2160; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02566-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Escherichia coli infections
Genomic Islands
hemolytic-uremic syndrome
Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli
virulence factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336