Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Covariability of Vibrio cholerae Microdiversity and Environmental Parameters

Young-Gun Zo, Nipa Chokesajjawatee, Eiji Arakawa, Haruo Watanabe, Anwar Huq, Rita R. Colwell
Young-Gun Zo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nipa Chokesajjawatee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eiji Arakawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haruo Watanabe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anwar Huq
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rita R. Colwell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02139-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Fine-scale diversity of natural bacterial assemblages has been attributed to neutral radiation because correspondence between bacterial phylogenetic signals in the natural environment and environmental parameters had not been detected. Evidence that such correspondence occurs is provided for Vibrio cholerae, establishing a critical role for environmental parameters in bacterial diversity.

A notable discovery arising from recent investigations of the microbial world is the immense phylogenetic diversity of natural bacterial populations that determines the fine architecture of “microdiversity clusters” (1). Bacterial populations in coastal waters form clusters of diverse clonal entities that radiate from a limited number of major phylogenetic branches (17). This finding prompts questions of how such a population structure can arise. Previous studies have suggested that the mechanism of the microdiversity structure is an accumulation of neutral genetic variation, after periodic selective sweeps acting against the nonfittest clonal entities (1, 2, 17), mainly because no discernible correspondence could be observed between DNA sequence polymorphism of bacterial housekeeping genes and environmental variation (17). Considering a neutral diversity mechanism alone, however, seemingly contradicts other facts of bacterial microevolution that have been gleaned from studies undertaken in different fields of microbiology. Simulated microevolution experiments demonstrated that a defined population of a given bacterial strain can develop into two or more variants occupying different ecological niches (6). Convincing evidence for niche-specific selection in the determination of a global community structure of Prochlorococcus, an autotrophic bacterium, has been provided by Follows et al. (3). Therefore, the question of whether natural selection within diverse ecological niches leads to the formation of seemingly neutral microdiversity remains an intriguing question with respect to the population structure of heterotrophic bacteria in nature. In the present study, extracellular (or ectocellular), phenotypic or genotypic traits of Vibrio cholerae, an indigenous inhabitant of estuaries (10), were analyzed with respect to spatial and temporal correspondence of variability in bacterial population diversity to variation in selected environmental parameters.

A set of 221 V. cholerae strains examined in the present study were isolated from the upper Chesapeake Bay from 1998 to 2000 and collected in a census-style survey carried out in our laboratory (10). In brief, V. cholerae was isolated at five shore sampling stations (sites from North to South: F, Susquehanna river flat; B, Baltimore Inner Harbor; K, Kent Island; S, estuarine shore on the Rhode River subestuary; and H, Horn Point) biweekly during the summer and monthly in other seasons of the year. Using membrane filters and nylon nets, suspended particulates in the surface water (0- to 1-m depth) were collected and split into three size fractions: >0.2 μm, 20 to 64 μm, and >64 μm. Each of the particulate samples was used as an inoculum in enrichment cultures from which V. cholerae colonies were isolated.

The Sakazaki O serotype (13) of each isolate was determined by using a pool of 210 standard polyclonal antibodies, together with other characteristics listed in Fig. 1. Isolates were also tested for presence or absence of toxin genes and outer membrane protein genes by using a dot blot hybridization method (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for further information). Alleles of genes in each of the isolates were determined by assigning isolates to an allele class according to hybridization signal intensity. The classes were determined by coding the signal intensity semiquantitatively on a scale of 0 to 4, in steps as follows: 0 to 25%, 25 to 50%, 50 to 75%, and 75 to 100% signal intensity compared to the positive control. The results of phenotypic and genotypic tests were coded as binary or five-state characters, e.g., absence (e.g., ΔhlyA) and four allele classes (e.g., hlyA+, hlyA2+, hlyA3+, or hlyA4+). Isolates sharing an identical set of characters were concluded to belong to the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and were treated as identical clones.

The cholera toxin-related genes (ctxA, tcpA, and zot) were absent in all environmental isolates of V. cholerae. Phenotypic traits invariable among isolates included the following: growth in nutrient broth containing 0, 1, 3, and 8% NaCl; acid production from sucrose and arabinose; the production of enzymes such as arginine dihydrolase, oxidase, and gelatinase; the hydrolysis of esculin; and sensitivity to 10 and 150 mg of vibriostatic agent O/129. The power of the 18 variable phenotypic, genotypic, and serological traits to differentiate V. cholerae strains was estimated by clonal redundancy, calculated as the ratio of the total number of strains to the number of OTUs. From the 221 strains, 150 OTUs could be defined. Therefore, clonal redundancy was estimated to be 1.5, signifying two bacterial types for every three V. cholerae isolates. This level of microdiversity is comparable to that determined from 16S rRNA sequence ribotypes (2.1 × 1,067 clones/516 ribotypes) (1), the hsp60 DNA sequence (1.7 = 232 isolates/141 alleles) (17), and genomic restriction fragment length polymorphism (1.1 = 206 isolates/180 electrophoretic types) (17).

The distance between OTU pairs was calculated as the number of different phenotypic characteristics, or gene loci, and hierarchal cluster analysis was performed by using the complete linkage method (Fig. 1). The higher-order branches were fixed predominantly with specific allele classes of genotypic traits, e.g., toxR, ompU, and ompW. Other genotypic traits, namely, stn and hlyA, and phenotypic traits, including serotype, were variable in the lower-order clusters. Polymorphism of the 16S rRNA genes (Fig. 1), only a few bases when determined from the evenly scattered selection of seven strain sequences (18), showed congruence with phenotypic divergence and was compatible with the criterion for a microdiversity cluster (i.e., >99% similarity in any pair of sequences).

The composition of the V. cholerae population (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) and its characteristics varied by geographic location and time of sampling (Fig. 2). To determine how much variation in the clonal diversity of V. cholerae populations can be attributed to differences in geographic location and time of sampling, redundancy analysis (RDA) (11) or canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (15), implemented in CANOCO for Windows version 4.5 (16), was performed on either the incidence of OTUs or the prevalence of characteristics, the latter being defined as the ratio of the number of OTUs with the given characteristic to the number of OTUs in the V. cholerae population isolated from a specific enrichment flask. The difference in sampling station and sampling date was used as the factor in the two-way factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering each set of three enrichment flasks as replicates for a given sample, since the effect of the difference in inocula was determined to be insignificant (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Since decomposition of the total temporal variance by different scales of time can account for the temporal dimension in the succession of V. cholerae populations, a nested ANOVA design was used for further variance decomposition analyses (Table 1). Among the time scales, season (3-month periods) was the significant factor in the variation in prevalence of a characteristic (16% of the total variance), whereas only variation by month was significant for the occurrence of an OTU (17% of the total variance). This result strongly indicated that turnover in a component of the population was significant at monthly intervals, whereas turnover in a characteristic was slower, i.e., at 3-month intervals. In other words, the succession of bacterial taxa showing microdiversity occurred monthly, while a proportion of the characteristics, e.g., “core” characteristics, are commonly carried by the population for an entire season.

Water temperature, salinity, pH, chlorophyll a concentration, and total bacterial number for the 31 water samples that yielded at least one V. cholerae isolate in the survey (10) were normalized by transformations and analyzed for correlation with variation in characteristics of V. cholerae, using the multiple regression methods of RDA. Most of the variance (6.9% of the total variance of the characteristics; P < 0.01) was explained by pH. The main effect of the other variables was not significant. The predominance of pH over the four other parameters was due to colinearity in the seasonal variation of the parameters (10). When the residuals of the prevalence of characteristics, after accounting for pH, were considered using a reduced RDA model with pH as a covariate, ca. 6.0% of the residual, i.e., 5.6% of the total variance, could be accounted for by salinity (P < 0.046). To identify characteristics that correlated significantly with pH and salinity, a correlation analysis was done for each bacterial characteristic. The heat-stable enterotoxin (stn) gene was found to be significantly correlated with salinity, as was the presence of V. cholerae serogroup O39. In the case of pH, a reverse proportional relationship with mannose and O40 serogroup was observed (Fig. 3).

An ecological association of V. cholerae with zooplankton was established in earlier studies (14). Zooplankton composition data were available in units of relative abundance for 15 taxa (10), ranging from phylum to suborder (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). Zooplankton taxonomic composition was converted to prevalence in a sample by dividing by the total number of zooplankton in a sample. Prevalence values were transformed by square root to calculate the Hellinger distance during the ordination analyses (8). The a priori hypothesis that crustacean zooplankton (notably copepods) provide a microhabitat for specific V. cholerae clones had been established, based on the observation of preferential attachment of V. cholerae O1 to crustacean exuviae (4, 5, 14). The copepod community in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem is recognized as one of the most significant trophic components, based on predominance of two species of calanoid copepods (Acartia tonsa and Eurytemora affinis) in the mesozooplankton communities, both of which demonstrate a strong seasonal and spatial variation (7, 12). Crustaceans were the dominant component of the mesozooplankton community and copepod nauplii were dominant and present in all samples (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). The dynamics could be were summarized by two principal axes in the principal component analysis, which classified four groups of taxa (see Fig. S2B in the supplemental material). To test the a priori hypothesis of a biological association of crustaceans and bacterial characteristics, explanation of the variability observed among V. cholerae characteristics by dynamics of 10 crustacean taxa was examined. Indeed, the variation observed with respect to the prevalence of members of the crustacean community accounted for nearly half (49.3%) of the total variance of the bacterial characteristics (P = 0.036). Forward selection was performed on the prevalence of crustacean taxa to determine the simplest, most effective model for visualizing the mechanism that resulted in this correlation, and cyclopoids and cladocerans were found to be the crustacean taxa significantly accounting for the observed variation in selected bacterial characteristics, either independently (10% variance with P = 0.030 and 7% variance with P = 0.002 for cyclopoids and cladocerans, respectively) or as a linear additive model (11% variance with P = 0.040). None of the other crustacean taxa provided significant accountability for variation in the bacterial characteristics (P > 0.05), including the most abundant copepod nauplii (P = 0.068). Variance in the bacterial characteristic-crustacean taxon correlation is interpreted as the response of the bacterial population to a shift in crustacean community structure, characterized as a shift from calanoid dominance to cyclopoids or cladocerans (see Fig. S2C in the supplemental material). According to the results of the correlation analysis (Fig. 3), the shift to cyclopoids was correlated with ompU3+, whereas the shift to cladocerans was correlated with hlyA3+.

In the present study, we examined diversity in a population of V. cholerae, with a focus on phenotype and genotype, namely, genes coding for extracellular products involved in interactions with the external physicochemical environment. A significant correspondence was found between phenotypic, genotypic, and serological traits of V. cholerae and its environment. Variation in bacterial population structure, namely, seasonal succession or spatial differentiation associated with given bacterial populations, demonstrates a spatiotemporal correspondence with environmental conditions. In the case of the zooplankton community, correspondence occurred at a taxon scale, at which the microdiverse population structure of V. cholerae is generated by selective pressure arising from its habitat.

The 16S rRNA sequences determined in the present study were deposited in GenBank under accession no. EF684899 to EF684905.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Hierarchal clusters of OTUs based on complete linkage analysis of characteristics (left) and maximum-likelihood tree of 16S rRNA sequences (right) of randomly selected strains. The OTU label is presented as follows: arbitrary identification no.-genotypic traits-phenotypic traits-O serogroup. The genotypic traits include transmembrane regulatory gene (toxR), hemolysin subunit A (hlyA), heat-stable enterotoxin gene (stn), and two outer membrane protein genes (ompU and ompW), and the phenotypic traits include growth in nutrient broth containing 6% NaCl (NaCl6); acid production from mannose (Mns) and mannitol (Mnt); production of enzymes, including ornithine decarboxylase (Orn), lysine decarboxylase (Lys), amylase (Amy), lipase (Lp), and chitinase (Ch); response to the methyl red test (MR); Voges-Proskauer tests (VP); response to 50 U of polymyxin B (PB); and growth at 42°C (G42oC). Symbols: •, three identical sequences; ○, five divergent sequences. Scale bars: left bar, number of differences; right bar, substitutions per base pair. The abbreviations defined here are used in Fig. 2.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Prevalence of V. cholerae characteristics, shown as star charts. Inset (spines radiating from a common origin): the solid line spine represents scale bars for 100% prevalence of a characteristic. The angle of a star chart apex represents the characteristic indicated by the accompanying label; labels give abbreviations for phenotypic and genotypic characteristics used in Fig. 1 or O-serogroup names. For the star charts, the origin indicates the site and time of sampling; the apex indicates the prevalence of a characteristic, ranging from zero to 100%; the thin, solid lines show the lines connecting apexes (prevalence values) for selected phenotypic characteristics (NaCl6, Mns, Mnt, Orn, Lys, MR, VP, Amy, Lp, Ch, PB, and G42oC [see the legend to Fig. 1 for definitions], counterclockwise starting from the apex with the zero tangent); the thin, gray lines show the lines connecting apexes for genotypic characteristics (toxR+, toxR3+, toxR4+, hlyA3+, hlyA4+, ompU2+, ompU3+, ompU4+, ompW2+, ompW3+, ompW4+, Δstn, and stn4+ in counterclockwise order); the thick, solid lines show the lines connecting apexes for O serogroups (O2-O200 and “OUT”, i.e., untypeable O serogroups). On the horizontal axis, tick marks indicate the 15th day of the given month.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Distribution of prevalence of selected bacterial traits compared to pH, salinity (middle and bottom rows), and prevalence of zooplankton groups (top row). Labels: r, Pearson correlation coefficient; *, significance (P) of r determined from randomization test of <0.05. The randomization test used the permutation method of toroidal shift, keeping the temporal order of sampling and treating site as permutation block. **, significance of r is <0.01.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Decomposition of variance of trait prevalence and OTU incidence by site and hierarchy of time scalesa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1R01A139129-01 and National Science Foundation grant 01200677.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 18 September 2007.
    • Accepted 22 February 2008.
  • ↵*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland Institute of Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742. Phone: (301) 405-9550. Fax: (301) 314-6654. E-mail: rcolwell{at}umiacs.umd.edu
  • ↵▿ Published ahead of print on 29 February 2008.

  • ↵† Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Acinas, S. G., V. Klepac-Ceraj, D. E. Hunt, C. Pharino, I. Ceraj, D. L. Distel, and M. F. Polz. 2004. Fine-scale phylogenetic architecture of a complex bacterial community. Nature 430:551-554.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Cohan, F. M. 2002. What are bacterial species? Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:457-487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Follows, M. J., S. Dutkiewicz, S. Grant, and S. W. Chisholm. 2007. Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean. Science 315:1843-1846.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Huq, A., E. B. Small, P. A. West, M. I. Huq, R. Rahman, and R. R. Colwell. 1984. Influence of water temperature, salinity, and pH on survival and growth of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae serovar O1 associated with live copepods in laboratory microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48:420-424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Huq, A., E. B. Small, P. A. West, R. Rahman, and R. R. Colwell. 1983. Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic crustacean copepods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:275-283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Kassen, R., and P. B. Rainey. 2004. The ecology and genetics of microbial diversity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:207-231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Kimmel, D. G., and M. R. Roman. 2004. Long-term trends in mesozooplankton abundance in Chesapeake Bay, USA: influence of freshwater input. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 267:71-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    Legendre, P., and E. D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformation for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Lepš, J., and P. Šmilauer. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  10. ↵
    Louis, V. R., E. Russek-Cohen, N. Choopun, I. N. Rivera, B. Gangle, S. C. Jiang, A. Rubin, J. A. Patz, A. Huq, and R. R. Colwell. 2003. Predictability of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2773-2785.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Rao, C. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyaá Ser. A 26:329-358.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    Roman, M., X. Zhang, C. McGilliard, and W. Boicourt. 2005. Seasonal and annual variability in the spatial patterns of plankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50:480-492.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Shimada, T., E. Arakawa, K. Itoh, T. Okitsu, A. Matsushima, Y. Asai, S. Yamai, T. Nakazato, G. B. Nair, M. J. Albert, and Y. Takeda. 1994. Extended serotyping scheme for Vibrio cholerae. Curr. Microbiol. 28:175-178.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    Tamplin, M. L., A. L. Gauzens, A. Huq, D. A. Sack, and R. R. Colwell. 1990. Attachment of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 to zooplankton and phytoplankton of Bangladesh waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1977-1980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 65:1167-1179.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    ter Braak, C. J. F., and P. Šmilauer. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
  17. ↵
    Thompson, J. R., S. Pacocha, C. Pharino, V. Klepac-Ceraj, D. E. Hunt, J. Benoit, R. Sarma-Rupavtarm, D. L. Distel, and M. F. Polz. 2005. Genotypic diversity within a natural coastal bacterioplankton population. Science 307:1311-1313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Zo, Y.-G., and R. R. Colwell. 2008. A simple binomial test for estimating sequencing errors in public repository 16S rRNA sequences. J. Microbiol. Methods 72:166-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • American Society for Microbiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Covariability of Vibrio cholerae Microdiversity and Environmental Parameters
Young-Gun Zo, Nipa Chokesajjawatee, Eiji Arakawa, Haruo Watanabe, Anwar Huq, Rita R. Colwell
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Apr 2008, 74 (9) 2915-2920; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02139-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Covariability of Vibrio cholerae Microdiversity and Environmental Parameters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Share
Covariability of Vibrio cholerae Microdiversity and Environmental Parameters
Young-Gun Zo, Nipa Chokesajjawatee, Eiji Arakawa, Haruo Watanabe, Anwar Huq, Rita R. Colwell
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Apr 2008, 74 (9) 2915-2920; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02139-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336