Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Physiology

Construction and Characterization of Three Lactate Dehydrogenase-Negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 Mutants

Maria Jönsson, Zhian Saleihan, Ingolf F. Nes, Helge Holo
Maria Jönsson
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maria.jonsson@umb.no
Zhian Saleihan
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingolf F. Nes
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helge Holo
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00344-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The roles of the two ldh genes of Enterococcus faecalis were studied using knockout mutants. Deletion of ldh-1 causes a metabolic shift from homolactic fermentation to ethanol, formate, and acetoin production, with a high level of formate production even under aerobic conditions. Ldh-2 plays only a minor role in lactate production.

Carbohydrate metabolism in economically important lactic acid bacterial species, such as Lactococcus lactis, has been extensively studied. However, in lactic acid bacterial species such as Enterococcus faecalis, with less industrial value, research focus has so far been mostly on medical aspects. E. faecalis has two lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) genes (3, 17), with high similarity to ldhA and ldhB of Lactococcus lactis, respectively (2). In L. lactis, ldhA is responsible for all lactate production, while ldhB remains unexpressed. To understand the role of these genes in E. faecalis, and to gain more insight into energy metabolism, we made and characterized three ldh knockout mutants in E. faecalis V583, removing either ldh-1 (EF_0255), ldh-2 (EF_0641) or both.

To achieve the construction of deletion mutants, we made a new shuttle vector based on the thermosensitive replicon of pG+host4 (12). Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzyme, Espoo, Finland) was used for PCR in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. A part of pG+host4 was amplified with PCR using primers pgh41 and pgh42 (Table 1) and cloned in the HincII site of pBluescript SK+ to produce the plasmid pAS221. The tetM gene of Lactobacillus plantarum 5057 (4) was amplified by PCR using primers Dbd43f and Dbd44r (Table 1) and cloned in pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, United Kingdom), subsequently excised from the recombinant plasmid with EcoRI, and cloned in pAS221 cut with the same enzyme to yield pAS222 (Fig. 1). The various parts of the vector were verified by restriction enzyme analysis.

Gene replacement was achieved by double-crossover homologous recombination, using pAS222 as cloning vector. Deletion of about one-third of each ldh gene was done by two-step PCR (7) using the outer primer pairs MJ1-MJ2 for ldh-1 and MJ5-MJ6 for ldh-2 (Table 1). The inner primer pairs carrying regions of homology for the fusion step were MJ3-MJ4 for Δldh-1 and MJ7-MJ8 for Δldh-2 (Table 1). The constructs were cloned into the SnabI site of pAS222 and propagated in Escherichia coli cells. To replace the genes on the chromosome withthe constructs, these were transformed into electrocompetent V583 cells, where electrocompetence was achieved as described by Holo and Nes (8), with 4% to 6% glycine in the growth medium. Selection for double-crossover events was done as described by Biswas et al. (1), and tetracycline-sensitive mutants could be detected after approximately 50 to 100 generations at 28°C. The double mutant was made by using the Δldh-2 construct in Δldh-1 cells. The mutants were verified by DNA sequencing. No enzymatic lactate dehydrogenase activity could be detected in the double mutant.

All strains were grown overnight (22 h) at 37°C in batch in filled, tightly capped tubes (anaerobic) or in Erlenmeyer flasks with vigorous shaking (aerobic) in a chemically defined medium with 61 mM glucose as the carbon source (16, 19), supplemented with 0.283 mM adenine, 0.666 mM asparagine, 1.37 mM glutamine, 0.181 mM guanine, 0.208 mM l-cystine, 0.196 mM uracil, and 23.6 mM sodium bicarbonate (14).

The growth rate of the mutants was similar to that of the wild-type strain, V583. This result is similar to observations regarding, for example, L. lactis (2), where little or no difference in growth rate between wild-type strains and ldh knockout mutants could be observed. The mutants did not show reduced growth yields compared to the wild type.

Metabolic end products in the medium were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography and headspace gas chromatography (13, 15) (Table 2). As shown in Table 2, the ldh-2 mutant showed hardly any differences in growth and metabolism in comparison to the wild type. The two mutants lacking ldh-1, on the other hand, produced much less lactate than the wild type but grew to higher cell densities and had higher final pHs (Table 2). Mutants lacking ldh-1 produced lactate levels about 25% relative to those of the wild type. This indicates that the ldh-2 gene is not completely silent, as has been reported for L. lactis (6), but contributes to the total lactate production in E. faecalis. Some residual lactate production was seen in the double ldh mutant. Small amounts of lactate can be formed in other pathways (5). The residual lactate was not due to a large increase in d-lactate production.

The wild-type V583 strain converted glucose almost exclusively to lactate under anaerobic conditions. With aeration, this strain made the same amounts of lactate as was observed during anaerobic growth but also produced considerable amounts of acetate, resulting in a lactate/acetate ratio of 2:1 (Table 2).

The metabolic profile of mutants lacking ldh-1 showed large differences from the wild type. Without aeration, the metabolic end products from Δldh-1 and Δldh-1 Δldh-2 were mostly formate, ethanol, and acetoin (Table 2). With aeration, Δldh-1 and Δldh-1 Δldh-2 produced acetate but also considerable amounts of ethanol and formate, indicating high activity levels for both pyruvate formate lyase (Pfl) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (Fig. 1). The data imply that these two enzymes made fairly equal contributions to metabolism of pyruvate under aerobic conditions. Like Pfl from other sources, the E. faecalis enzyme has been reported to be readily inactivated by oxygen (11, 22). However, citrate synthase-deficient E. coli can produce formate by using Pfl under aerobic conditions (10).

The ldh-1 mutants detoxified excess pyruvate by converting it to acetoin (Fig. 2), which can play a useful role in maintaining intracellular pH by affecting the proton motive force (9, 23). We observed no butanediol production (Table 2). The E. faecalis mutants produced the same amounts of acetoin during anaerobic and aerobic conditions, in contrast to L. lactis, where acetoin production increases in the presence of oxygen, and butanediol production can be observed under certain conditions during anaerobic growth (2, 18).

In the Δldh-1 cultures, acetate and citrate were consumed under anaerobic conditions, indicating that E. faecalis can use these compounds as external electron acceptors. We measured citrate and glucose utilization in wild-type V583 cells and in Δldh-1 Δldh-2 at 1-h intervals during growth by using K-CITR and K-GLUHKR kits from Megazyme (Bray, Ireland). Unlike the wild type, the mutant showed concomitant consumption of citrate and glucose (data not shown). Citrate utilization is regulated by catabolite repression in E. faecalis (20), so apparently, one effect of Δldh-1 is to relieve, at least in part, catabolite repression.

In conclusion, we have shown that although Ldh-2 contributes to lactate production, Ldh-1 plays the major role in energy metabolism in E. faecalis. We show that Ldh-2 alone is not able to handle the large amounts of pyruvate formed in glycolysis. This leads to production of mixed acids, as is also observed in ldh knockouts in other lactic acid bacterial species. Further metabolic studies of the ldh mutants will provide valuable insight and maybe keys to regulation of pathogenicity and virulence (21).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Plasmid map of pAS222. Resistance genes and origins of replication are indicated by arrows. Restriction sites used in cloning are marked.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Glucose metabolism in Enterococcus faecalis. LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALS, acetolactate synthase; PFL, pyruvate formate lyase; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Primer sequences and their locations on the V583 chromosome

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Metabolites in supernatants from batch-grown E. faecalis V583 and the ldh mutantsa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the SysMO project, funded by the Norwegian Research Council.

Thanks to Kari Olsen for analyzing metabolic samples.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 February 2009.
    • Accepted 13 May 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Biswas, I., A. Gruss, S. D. Ehrlich, and E. Maguin. 1993. High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol.175:3628-3635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Bongers, R. S., M. H. Hoefnagel, M. J. Starrenburg, M. A. Siemerink, J. G. Arends, J. Hugenholtz, and M. Kleerebezem. 2003. IS981-mediated adaptive evolution recovers lactate production by ldhB transcription activation in a lactate dehydrogenase-deficient strain of Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol.185:4499-4507.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Bourgogne, A., D. A. Garsin, X. Qin, K. V. Singh, J. Sillanpaa, S. Yerrapragada, Y. Ding, S. Dugan-Rocha, C. Buhay, H. Shen, G. Chen, G. Williams, D. Muzny, A. Maadani, K. A. Fox, J. Gioia, L. Chen, Y. Shang, C. A. Arias, S. R. Nallapareddy, M. Zhao, V. P. Prakash, S. Chowdhury, H. Jiang, R. A. Gibbs, B. E. Murray, S. K. Highlander, and G. M. Weinstock. 2008. Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol.9:R110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Danielsen, M. 2002. Characterization of the tetracycline resistance plasmid pMD5057 from Lactobacillus plantarum 5057 reveals a composite structure. Plasmid48:98-103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Ferain, T., A. N. Schanck, and J. Delcour. 1996. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of glucose and citrate end products in an ldhL-ldhD double-knockout strain of Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol.178:7311-7315.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Gaspar, P., A. R. Neves, C. A. Shearman, M. J. Gasson, A. M. Baptista, D. L. Turner, C. M. Soares, and H. Santos. 2007. The lactate dehydrogenases encoded by the ldh and ldhB genes in Lactococcus lactis exhibit distinct regulation and catalytic properties—comparative modeling to probe the molecular basis. FEBS J.274:5924-5936.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Higuchi, R. 1990. Recombinant PCR, p. 177-183. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (ed.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  8. 8.↵
    Holo, H., and I. F. Nes. 1989. High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.55:3119-3123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Hugenholtz, J., L. Perdon, and T. Abee. 1993. Growth and energy generation by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis during citrate metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.59:4216-4222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Lee, J., A. Goel, M. M. Ataai, and M. M. Domach. 1994. Flux adaptations of citrate synthase-deficient Escherichia coli. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.745:35-50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Lindmark, D. G., P. Paolella, and N. P. Wood. 1969. The pyruvate formate-lyase system of Streptococcus faecalis. I. Purification and properties of the formate-pyruvate exchange enzyme. J. Biol. Chem.244:3605-3612.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Maguin, E., H. Prevost, S. D. Ehrlich, and A. Gruss. 1996. Efficient insertional mutagenesis in lactococci and other gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol.178:931-935.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Marsili, R. T. 1981. Monitoring bacterial metabolites in cultured buttermilk by high performance liquid chromatography and headspace gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci.19:451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Mickelson, M. N. 1964. Chemically defined medium for growth of Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Bacteriol.88:158-164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Narvhus, J. A., K. Thorvaldsen, and R. K. Abrahamsen. 1990. Quantitative determination of volatile compounds produced by Lactococcus spp. using direct automatic headspace gas chromatography. Brief communications and abstracts of posters,vol. II, p. 522. XXII Int. Dairy Congr., Montreal, Canada.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Otto, R., A. S. Sonnenberg, H. Veldkamp, and W. N. Konings. 1980. Generation of an electrochemical proton gradient in Streptococcus cremoris by lactate efflux. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA77:5502-5506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Paulsen, I. T., L. Banerjei, G. S. Myers, K. E. Nelson, R. Seshadri, T. D. Read, D. E. Fouts, J. A. Eisen, S. R. Gill, J. F. Heidelberg, H. Tettelin, R. J. Dodson, L. Umayam, L. Brinkac, M. Beanan, S. Daugherty, R. T. DeBoy, S. Durkin, J. Kolonay, R. Madupu, W. Nelson, J. Vamathevan, B. Tran, J. Upton, T. Hansen, J. Shetty, H. Khouri, T. Utterback, D. Radune, K. A. Ketchum, B. A. Dougherty, and C. M. Fraser. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science299:2071-2074.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Platteeuw, C., J. Hugenholtz, M. Starrenburg, I. van Alen-Boerrigter, and W. M. de Vos. 1995. Metabolic engineering of Lactococcus lactis: influence of the overproduction of alpha-acetolactate synthase in strains deficient in lactate dehydrogenase as a function of culture conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61:3967-3971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Poolman, B., and W. N. Konings. 1988. Relation of growth of Streptococcus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris to amino acid transport. J. Bacteriol.170:700-707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Rea, M. C., and T. M. Cogan. 2003. Catabolite repression in Enterococcus faecalis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol.26:159-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Richardson, A. R., S. J. Libby, and F. C. Fang. 2008. A nitric oxide-inducible lactate dehydrogenase enables Staphylococcus aureus to resist innate immunity. Science319:1672-1676.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Snoep, J. L., M. J. Teixeira de Mattos, P. W. Postma, and O. M. Neijssel. 1990. Involvement of pyruvate dehydrogenase in product formation in pyruvate-limited anaerobic chemostat cultures of Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 775. Arch. Microbiol.154:50-55.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Tsau, J. L., A. A. Guffanti, and T. J. Montville. 1992. Conversion of pyruvate to acetoin helps to maintain pH homeostasis in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.58:891-894.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Construction and Characterization of Three Lactate Dehydrogenase-Negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 Mutants
Maria Jönsson, Zhian Saleihan, Ingolf F. Nes, Helge Holo
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2009, 75 (14) 4901-4903; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00344-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Construction and Characterization of Three Lactate Dehydrogenase-Negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 Mutants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Construction and Characterization of Three Lactate Dehydrogenase-Negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 Mutants
Maria Jönsson, Zhian Saleihan, Ingolf F. Nes, Helge Holo
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2009, 75 (14) 4901-4903; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00344-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Enterococcus faecalis
Gene Knockout Techniques
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336