Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Methods

Inducible-Expression Plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans

Alice C. Ind, Steven L. Porter, Mostyn T. Brown, Elaine D. Byles, Jennifer A. de Beyer, Scott A. Godfrey, Judith P. Armitage
Alice C. Ind
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United KingdomOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven L. Porter
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United KingdomOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mostyn T. Brown
Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine D. Byles
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United KingdomOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer A. de Beyer
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Godfrey
School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headington OX3 0BP, United KingdomCentre for Research in Plant Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith P. Armitage
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United KingdomOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: judith.armitage@bioch.ox.ac.uk
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01587-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We have developed a stable isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible-expression plasmid, pIND4, which allows graduated levels of protein expression in the alphaproteobacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans. pIND4 confers kanamycin resistance and combines the stable replicon of pMG160 with the lacIq gene from pYanni3 and the lac promoter, PA1/04/03, from pJBA24.

Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans are often used for the study of bacterial metabolism, bioenergetics (8), and signal transduction (11). Although inducible-expression plasmids are available for these organisms, e.g., pRKSK1 (5) and pRECTX (9), these plasmids suffer from one or more of the following problems. First, continuous antibiotic selection is essential for maintaining the plasmid in the population, e.g., plasmid pRK415 (7), which is the vector backbone for most of the available expression vectors for these species, is retained by only approximately 10% of the population after 40 generations without antibiotic selection (6) (segregational instability). Second, the inducer affects the expression of many endogenous genes; for example, several R. sphaeroides vectors use either light- or oxygen-inducible promoters to deliver high levels of protein expression (5). However, light and oxygen affect the expression of over 35% of the endogenous genes in this organism (2), which limifts the use of these vectors in functional studies.

The plasmid developed in this study, pIND4 (Fig. 1), uses the pMG170 vector backbone (6), the lacIq gene from pYanni3 (4), and the isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible-expression cassette from pJBA24, which includes the PA1/04/03 promoter, a ribosome binding site, a polylinker, and two transcriptional terminators (1). pMG170 confers kanamycin resistance and is an Escherichia coli shuttle cloning vector derived from naturally occurring plasmid pMG160 of Rhodobacter blasticus, which replicates and is segregationally stable in several other members of the Rhodobacteraceae (6). In E. coli, pMG170 has a high copy number, replicating using the ColE1 origin, while in R. sphaeroides, the pMG160 origin delivers a copy number of 18 to 23 (6).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Plasmid map of the pIND4 expression vector. The key features are labeled: the inducible promoter, PA1/04/03 (red); the kanamycin resistance gene, Kmr (purple); the pMG160 sequence (dark green); ColE1 origin of replication, allowing replication of the plasmid in E. coli (pale green); transcriptional terminators (gray); and the lacIq gene (cyan). The vector contains a ribosome binding site (RBS) and provides the option of incorporating a C-terminal hexahistidine tag.

Vector construction.

The construction of pIND4 is described in the supplemental material.

Testing of the expression plasmid.

The coding sequence for the R. sphaeroides cheY6 gene was cloned into pIND4, generating pIND4-Y6. The plasmid was introduced into R. sphaeroides strain JPA1336 (ΔcheY6 derivative of WS8N) and P. denitrificans strain PD1222 (wild type) via conjugation with the E. coli donor strain S17-1 λpir (10). Cells containing the plasmid were grown from single colonies under aerobic conditions with shaking (225 rpm) in succinate medium containing 25 μg/ml kanamycin. The effects of different concentrations of IPTG (Fig. 2) and different induction times (Fig. 3) on CheY6 protein accumulation were investigated.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Effect of IPTG concentration on protein expression levels. Cells were grown in the presence of IPTG from single colonies and harvested when the optical density at 700 nm was 0.6 (∼3.8 × 108 cells/ml). The protein content of the cells was estimated by quantitative immunoblotting (3). (A) R. sphaeroides JPA1336 (ΔcheY6) containing pIND4-Y6. (B) P. denitrificans PD1222 containing pIND4-Y6. The zero baseline in each case was cells containing an empty pIND4 vector grown in the presence of 1,000 μM IPTG. Error bars show the standard errors of the means obtained from nine replicates.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Induction time course for cheY6 expression from pIND4-Y6 in R. sphaeroides JPA1336 (ΔcheY6) (A) and P. denitrificans Pd1222 (B). Cells were grown aerobically in succinate medium without IPTG until the optical density at 700 nm reached 0.3. IPTG (1 mM) was then added, and samples were taken at the intervals indicated. ⧫, uninduced cells; ▪, cells induced with 1 mM IPTG. Error bars show the standard errors of the means obtained from nine replicates.

At IPTG concentrations of less than 1 μM, no expression of CheY6 was detectable in R. sphaeroides (the minimum detection limit was ∼500 molecules per cell). When induced with 1,000 μM IPTG, expression levels of CheY6 in R. sphaeroides exceeded 250,000 molecules per cell (equivalent to ∼2.3 mg of protein per liter of culture). This represents at least a 500-fold induction of expression between no induction and maximal induction. The expression levels were sensitive to the concentration of IPTG used, with 10 μM and 100 μM delivering at least 15-fold and 300-fold inductions, respectively.

For P. denitrificans, the maximal induction level achieved with the vector (∼140,000 molecules per cell, corresponding to approximately 1.3 mg of the CheY6 protein per liter of culture) was comparable with that for R. sphaeroides (∼250,000 molecules per cell). However, unlike R. sphaeroides, there was leaky expression of CheY6 in P. denitrificans, with over 45,000 molecules per cell in the absence of IPTG, which limited the level of induction seen in P. denitrificans.

Segregational stability.

R. sphaeroides and P. denitrificans cells were grown in the absence of kanamycin, and the proportion of cells containing the plasmid was estimated by replica plating. After over 85 generations without antibiotic selection, the plasmid was retained in over 97% of bacteria.

Use of pIND4 to analyze an R. sphaeroides chemotaxis mutant.

R. sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory pathway (11). The expression levels of many components of the pathway are affected by light and oxygen levels (14), making previously used expression plasmids reliant on either light or oxygen as their inducer unsuitable for functional studies of the pathway. The cheY6(D56N) mutant of R. sphaeroides has a stopped phenotype, which, due to the stop-start nature of the R. sphaeroides flagellar motor, is analogous to the tumbly phenotype of E. coli chemotaxis mutants. Previously, we have shown that the phosphorylation site mutant protein, CheY6(D56N), can be phosphorylated by CheA3-P on an alternative residue (S83) and that functional CheA3 is required for the stopped phenotype of the cheY6(D56N) mutant, suggesting that phosphorylated CheY6(D56N) causes the stopped phenotype (12). We used pIND4 to test whether we could suppress the stopped phenotype of the cheY6(D56N) mutant by overexpressing each of the eight chemotaxis response regulators (RRs). We found that swimming was restored to this strain by the overexpression of the cognate RRs of CheA3 (CheY1, CheY6, and CheB2) but not by noncognate RRs (CheY2, CheY3, CheY4, CheY5, and CheB1) (Fig. 4 and see the supplemental material). Presumably, this was because the cognate RRs of CheA3 were able to outcompete CheY6(D56N) for phosphorylation by CheA3-P. These results are consistent with our hypothesis that the phosphorylation of CheY6(D56N) by CheA3 causes the stopped phenotype of the cheY6(D56N) mutant.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Swarm plate chemotaxis assay comparing the effect of expression of the chemotaxis response regulators on the chemotactic ability of JPA1213 [cheY6(D56N)]. The dotted line shows the swarm diameter produced by a nonmotile strain; swarm diameters significantly larger than this indicate motility. The swarm plates contained 100 μM propionate and 1 mM IPTG and were incubated for 48 h under aerobic conditions. Error bars show the standard errors of the means obtained from nine replicates.

Anticipated uses of pIND4.

The stability of pIND4 combined with its nonendogenous inducible promoter are distinct advantages over previously reported expression plasmids for R. sphaeroides and P. denitrificans. In R. sphaeroides, the plasmid showed minimal levels of leakiness, with greater-than-500-fold induction of CheY6 expression upon the addition of IPTG. In P. denitrificans, the plasmid showed some level of leakiness, which may limit its application in this organism. High levels of protein production were obtained for both R. sphaeroides and P. denitrificans when maximally induced, yielding ∼2.3 and 1.3 mg of the CheY6 protein per liter of culture. We have also successfully used pIND4 to express CheY6 in E. coli, where we obtained a yield of ∼2.5 mg per liter of culture. These high levels of expression suggest that in addition to functional studies, pIND4 may also be useful for the overexpression and subsequent purification of proteins. The large membrane surface area of R. sphaeroides offers the potential for obtaining much higher yields of membrane proteins than with other bacterial hosts (13).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The pIND4 sequence has been deposited in the EMBL database under accession number FM164773.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the MRC-, EPSRC-, BBSRC-, and MoD-funded Bionanotechnology Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration and the BBSRC.

We thank Søren Molin for the kind gift of plasmid pJBA24 used in this study.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 July 2009.
    • Accepted 10 August 2009.
  • ↵▿ Published ahead of print on 14 August 2009.

  • ↵† Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

  • American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Andersen, J. B., C. Sternberg, L. K. Poulsen, S. P. Bjorn, M. Givskov, and S. Molin. 1998. New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:2240-2246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Arai, H., J. H. Roh, and S. Kaplan. 2008. Transcriptome dynamics during the transition from anaerobic photosynthesis to aerobic respiration in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. J. Bacteriol. 190:286-299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Ben-Anat Porat, Y., I. Zan-Bar, and A. Ravid. 1995. Quantitative dot-blot assay for low titer anti-lipopolysaccharide antibodies in human plasma. J. Immunol. Methods 180:213-218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Graupner, S., and W. Wackernagel. 2000. A broad-host-range expression vector series including a Ptac test plasmid and its application in the expression of the dod gene of Serratia marcescens (coding for ribulose-5-phosphate 3-epimerase) in Pseudomonas stutzeri. Biomol. Eng. 17:11-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hunter, C. N., B. S. Hundle, J. E. Hearst, H. P. Lang, A. T. Gardiner, S. Takaichi, and R. J. Cogdell. 1994. Introduction of new carotenoids into the bacterial photosynthetic apparatus by combining the carotenoid biosynthetic pathways of Erwinia herbicola and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 176:3692-3697.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Inui, M., K. Nakata, J. H. Roh, A. A. Vertes, and H. Yukawa. 2003. Isolation and molecular characterization of pMG160, a mobilizable cryptic plasmid from Rhodobacter blasticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:725-733.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Keen, N. T., S. Tamaki, D. Kobayashi, and D. Trollinger. 1988. Improved broad-host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 70:191-197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Nicholls, D. G., and S. J. Ferguson. 2009. Bioenergetics 3. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
  9. ↵
    Pasternak, C., K. Haberzettl, and G. Klug. 1999. Thioredoxin is involved in oxygen-regulated formation of the photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 181:100-106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Porter, S. L., G. H. Wadhams, and J. P. Armitage. 2007. In vivo and in vitro analysis of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis signaling complexes. Methods Enzymol. 423:392-413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Porter, S. L., G. H. Wadhams, and J. P. Armitage. 2008. Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling. Trends Microbiol. 16:251-260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Porter, S. L., G. H. Wadhams, A. C. Martin, E. D. Byles, D. E. Lancaster, and J. P. Armitage. 2006. The CheYs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Biol. Chem. 281:32694-32704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Roy, A., A. K. Shukla, W. Hasse, and H. Michel. 2008. Employing Rhodobacter sphaeroides to functionally express and purify human G protein-coupled receptors. Biol. Chem. 389:69-78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Shah, D. S. H., S. L. Porter, A. C. Martin, P. A. Hamblin, and J. P. Armitage. 2000. Fine tuning bacterial chemotaxis: analysis of Rhodobacter sphaeroides behaviour under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by mutation of the major chemotaxis operons and cheY genes. EMBO J. 19:4601-4613.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inducible-Expression Plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans
Alice C. Ind, Steven L. Porter, Mostyn T. Brown, Elaine D. Byles, Jennifer A. de Beyer, Scott A. Godfrey, Judith P. Armitage
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2009, 75 (20) 6613-6615; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01587-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inducible-Expression Plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Share
Inducible-Expression Plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans
Alice C. Ind, Steven L. Porter, Mostyn T. Brown, Elaine D. Byles, Jennifer A. de Beyer, Scott A. Godfrey, Judith P. Armitage
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2009, 75 (20) 6613-6615; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01587-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Vector construction.
    • Testing of the expression plasmid.
    • Segregational stability.
    • Use of pIND4 to analyze an R. sphaeroides chemotaxis mutant.
    • Anticipated uses of pIND4.
    • Nucleotide sequence accession number.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336