Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Distribution of Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Naturally O157-Shedding Cattle at Necropsy

James E. Keen, William W. Laegreid, Carol G. Chitko-McKown, Lisa M. Durso, James L. Bono
James E. Keen
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William W. Laegreid
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol G. Chitko-McKown
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa M. Durso
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James L. Bono
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, State Spur 18D, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Jim.Bono@ars.usda.gov
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00400-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) O157 occurrence was determined along the entire gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of each of four naturally shedding cattle and at three sites in 61 slaughter cattle. STEC O157 was distributed along the entire GIT, though interanimal distribution was variable. Neither feces nor rectoanal-junction samples accurately predicted the STEC O157-negative status of any particular animal.

Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 colonizes the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of healthy adult cattle, as evidenced by the natural and frequent occurrence of STEC O157 at the beginning (i.e., oral cavity) and end (i.e., rectal feces and rectoanal mucosa [RAM]) of the bovine GIT (7, 8, 12). Distribution of STEC O157 along the entire GIT has also been investigated in experimentally challenged livestock (4, 6, 9, 13), but these various challenge models may not accurately reflect natural bovine STEC O157 GIT infection or colonization sites. The objective of this study was to qualitatively determine viable STEC O157 occurrence along the entire GIT of naturally shedding adult cattle, including both mucosa and ingesta. We hypothesized that this distribution of STEC O157 would not be limited to the distal large intestine.

Four adult female mixed-breed beef cattle (Table 1) identified as shedding STEC O157 by fecal culture were humanely euthanized according to animal care and use guidelines. Sections at a total of 16 sites along the entire GIT (Fig. 1) were removed aseptically immediately posteuthanasia. Double-ligated sections were surface sterilized, a lateral incision was made in each section, and the solid or semisolid ingesta was gently removed while taking care not to scrape the underlying tissue. All remaining visible ingesta was removed using a stream of sterile water to rinse the tissue. The GIT tissues (10 g) and their adjacent luminal contents (ingesta, 10 g) were cultured for STEC O157 separately and in duplicate using selective Brilliant Green Bile broth enrichment, immunomagnetic separation (IMS), and selective agar plating on ChromAgar O157 with reduced tellurite as previously described (3). Suspect isolates were confirmed as STEC O157 by enzyme immunoassay for the O157 and H7 antigens (5, 14) and by PCR for Shiga toxin (stx1 and stx2), intimin (eae), hemolysin (hly), O-antigen (rfbEO157), and flagellar (fliCH7) genes (10).

Culture results from the four euthanized animals are summarized in Fig. 1. Results for the rectal ingesta (feces) of these animals were considered to indicate the presence of STEC O157 by fecal culture alone. STEC O157 distribution in the GIT was highly variable among animals. STEC O157 was found only in the small intestines of animals 1 and 3 (ingesta and tissue positive). The liver of animal 1 was also culture positive. Animal 2 was STEC O157 positive along the entire GIT, including the upper GIT, the rumen complex, the small intestine, and the large intestine. Animal 4 was culture negative at all GIT locations.

In a separate set of experiments examining mucosal and ingesta samples from one site each in the distal small intestine (ileum), distal large intestine (mid-rectum), and rectoanal junction (RAJ) of 61 fed cattle at processing whose STEC O157 shedding status was unknown, fecal STEC O157 culture underestimated the prevalence of STEC O157 present along the bovine GIT (Table 2). Whereas 19/61 animals (31%) were STEC O157 positive at any site, only 5 (26%) of these were fecal culture positive. These fecal culture results, taken alone, indicate a prevalence of only 8% (5/61). Additionally, 15/19 STEC O157-positive samples (78.9%) had positive tissue cultures and 10/19 (52.6%) ingesta samples had positive cultures. There were six animals (31.6%) that were both ingesta and tissue positive at any of the three sample sites, while nine animals (47.4%) yielded a STEC O157-positive culture only from tissue samples and four animals (21.1%) yielded a STEC O157-positive culture only from ingesta samples (Table 2). STEC O157 isolation from the ileum, mid-rectum, and RAJ of the 61 animals showed that STEC was present at all locations, with prevalences of 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7 to 22.2), 16.4% (95% CI, 8.2 to 28.1), and 21.3% (95% CI, 11.9 to 33.7), respectively (Table 3).

Our data show that STEC O157 can be isolated from tissues throughout the cattle GIT, including the tonsils, reticulum, rumen, omasum, abomasum, duodenum, jejunum, cecum, spiral colon, rectum, and even the liver, suggesting that STEC O157 is broadly adapted to many cattle GI microhabitats. It is not known whether the bacteria we detected using enrichment methods represented resident or transient strains. Recent studies debate the role of the bovine gallbladder as a focus of STEC O157 colonization in cattle (6, 1311). While gallbladders were not examined as part of this study, our results showed that STEC O157 can be found throughout the bovine GIT. Like others, we also isolated STEC O157 from tonsils and cecums (1, 2).

Research with artificially challenged animals suggests that the RAJ is the principal site of STEC O157 colonization in cattle (9). These conclusions were based, in part, on a failure to isolate STEC from rumen and ileum mucosa samples. We obtained samples from a larger number of GIT sites and were able to detect STEC O157 in a larger proportion of non-RAJ samples than Naylor et al. (9). Lim et al. (8) also concluded that the RAJ was the site of colonization because of an inability to culture STEC O157 from non-RAJ samples. Since we were working with naturally occurring STEC O157 strains, we were able to incorporate an IMS step into our protocol, which likely increased the sensitively of our detection method. Naylor et al. (9) used a marked STEC O157 strain that prohibited the use of an IMS step, and Lim et al. (8) also did not use IMS. Unlike Naylor et al. (9), we did not quantify STEC O157 or use immunochemistry to try to determine colonization status. Our results, based on culture of STEC O157 from 65 feedlot beef cattle that were naturally exposed to STEC O157, suggest that the dynamics of actual STEC O157 infections in the cattle GIT may involve more sites than just the RAJ. While no single sample site accounted for all of the positive animals, RAM tissue samples from cattle presented for slaughter were the most likely of the sites sampled to yield a positive result.

Based on STEC O157 culture and isolation from multiple sites along the entire GIT of naturally shedding cattle, fecal shedding greatly underestimates the true extent and prevalence of STEC O157 occurrence in the bovine reservoir. While a positive STEC O157 culture from any bovine GIT site indicates the presence of the pathogen, no single sample type, including feces or the RAM, can accurately predict the STEC O157-negative status of any particular animal. Our data suggest that there is high animal-to-animal variability in the location of STEC O157 in the GIT and that the small intestine may support STEC O157 colonization.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Composite schematic of the mouth-to-rectum distribution of STEC O157 in tissues and luminal contents at 16 sites in the GIT of four naturally infected cattle (frontal plane, dorsal view). Numbers refer to tested animals 1 to 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Animals used in the necropsy study

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

STEC O157 isolation from mucosa and ingesta samples from one site each in the ileum, mid-rectum, and RAJ of 19 of 61 cattle of unknown infection status at processinga

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Prevalence of STEC O157 in the ileum, mid-rectum, and RAJ of 61 fed cattle at processing

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sandy Fryda-Bradley, Ron Mlejnek, Tammy Sorensen, Stacy Bierman, Liz Ossian, Scott Schroetlin, Halah Bajaber, Josh Soucek, and Jenna Williams for microbiological and technical contributions and Joan Rosch for secretarial assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 February 2010.
    • Accepted 30 May 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bonardi, S., E. Foni, C. Chiapponi, A. Salsi, and F. Brindani. 2007. Detection of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups O157 and O26 in the cecal content and lymphatic tissue of cattle at slaughter in Italy. J. Food Prot.70:1493-1497.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Cray, W. C., Jr., and H. W. Moon. 1995. Experimental infection of calves and adult cattle with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61:1586-1590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Durso, L. M., K. Reynolds, N. Bauer, Jr., and J. E. Keen. 2005. Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections among livestock exhibitors and visitors at a Texas county fair. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis.5:193-201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Grauke, L. J., I. T. Kudva, J. W. Yoon, C. W. Hunt, C. J. Williams, and C. J. Hovde. 2002. Gastrointestinal tract location of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ruminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68:2269-2277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    He, Y., J. E. Keen, R. B. Westerman, E. T. Littledike, and J. Kwang. 1996. Monoclonal antibodies for detection of the H7 antigen of Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62:3325-3332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Jeong, K. C., M. Y. Kang, C. Heimke, J. A. Shere, I. Erol, and C. W. Kaspar. 2007. Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from the gall bladder of inoculated and naturally-infected cattle. Vet. Microbiol.119:339-345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Keen, J. E., and R. O. Elder. 2002. Isolation of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 from hide surfaces and the oral cavity of finished beef feedlot cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.220:756-763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Lim, J. Y., J. Li, H. Sheng, T. E. Besser, K. Potter, and C. J. Hovde. 2007. Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization at the rectoanal junction of long-duration culture-positive cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:1380-1382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Naylor, S. W., J. C. Low, T. E. Besser, A. Mahajan, G. J. Gunn, M. C. Pearce, I. J. McKendrick, D. G. E. Smith, and D. L. Gally. 2003. Lymphoid follicle-dense mucosa at the terminal rectum is the principal site of colonization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the bovine host. Infect. Immun.71:1505-1512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Paton, A. W., and J. C. Paton. 1998. Detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by using multiplex PCR assays for stx1, stx2, eaeA, enterohemorrhagic E. coli hlyA, rfbO111, and rfbO157. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:598-602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Reinstein, S., J. T. Fox, X. Shi, and T. G. Nagaraja. 2007. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in gallbladders of beef cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:1002-1004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Rice, D. H., H. Q. Sheng, S. A. Wynia, and C. J. Hovde. 2003. Rectoanal mucosal swab culture is more sensitive than fecal culture and distinguishes Escherichia coli O157:H7-colonized cattle and those transiently shedding the same organism. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:4924-4929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Stoffregen, W. C., J. F. L. Pohlenz, and E. A. Dean-Nystrom. 2004. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the gallbladders of experimentally infected calves. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.16:79-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Westerman, R. B., Y. He, J. E. Keen, E. T. Littledike, and J. Kwang. 1997. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for the lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli O157. J. Clin. Microbiol.35:679-684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Distribution of Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Naturally O157-Shedding Cattle at Necropsy
James E. Keen, William W. Laegreid, Carol G. Chitko-McKown, Lisa M. Durso, James L. Bono
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2010, 76 (15) 5278-5281; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00400-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distribution of Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Naturally O157-Shedding Cattle at Necropsy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distribution of Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Naturally O157-Shedding Cattle at Necropsy
James E. Keen, William W. Laegreid, Carol G. Chitko-McKown, Lisa M. Durso, James L. Bono
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2010, 76 (15) 5278-5281; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00400-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Shedding
cattle
Escherichia coli infections
Escherichia coli O157
gastrointestinal tract

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336