Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Methods

Use of a Mixture of Surrogates for Infectious Bioagents in a Standard Approach to Assessing Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces

Safaa Sabbah, Susan Springthorpe, Syed A. Sattar
Safaa Sabbah
Centre for Research on Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Springthorpe
Centre for Research on Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Syed A. Sattar
Centre for Research on Environmental Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ssattar@uottawa.ca
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00246-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We used a mixture of surrogates (Acinetobacter baumannii, Mycobacterium terrae, hepatitis A virus, and spores of Geobacillus stearothermophilus) for bioagents in a standardized approach to test environmental surface disinfectants. Each carrier containing 10 μl of mixture received 50 μl of a test chemical or saline at 22 ± 2°C. Disinfectant efficacy criteria were ≥6 log10 reduction for the bacteria and the spores and ≥3 log10 reduction for the virus. Peracetic acid (1,000 ppm) was effective in 5 min against the two bacteria and the spores but not against the virus. Chlorine dioxide (CD; 500 and 1,000 ppm) and domestic bleach (DB; 2,500, 3,500, and 5,000 ppm) were effective in 5 min, except for sporicidal activity, which needed 20 min of contact with either 1,000 ppm of CD or the two higher concentrations of DB.

Disinfectant testing with a single type of organism does not represent field conditions, where bioagents or other pathogens may be mixed with other contaminants. Such an approach also cannot predict the true spectrum of microbicidal activity of a given chemical, while the identity of the target pathogen(s) is often unknown. We used a mixture of Acinetobacter baumannii, Mycobacterium terrae (15), hepatitis A virus (HAV) (4), and the spores of Geobacillus stearothermophilus as surrogates for infectious bioagents, with an added soil load on disks (1 cm in diameter; 0.75 mm thick) of brushed stainless steel (AISI no. 430; Muzeen & Blythe, Winnipeg, MB, Canada), to better simulate environmental surface disinfection (1, 11). Table 1 gives details on the microbial strains, media used for their culture and recovery, and methods for preparing working stocks. The quantitative carrier test (QCT) method, ASTM standard E-2197 (1), was used to test the organisms singly and in a mixture. Each 200 μl of the inoculum contained 34 μl each of the four organisms, 40 μl of bovine mucin, 14 μl of yeast extract, and 10 μl of bovine serum albumin stocks.

Disinfectants tested were peracetic acid (PAA; 500 and 1,000 ppm), chlorine dioxide (CD; 500 and 1,000 ppm), and domestic bleach (DB; 2,500, 3,300, and 5,000 ppm). Buffered saline (pH 7.2) was the control fluid, eluent, and diluent. Hard water (400 ppm CaCO3) was the diluent for disinfectants (1).

Each disk received 10 μl of the inoculum, dried and covered with 50 μl of test substance, or saline at 22 ± 2°C. At the end of the contact time, each disk was eluted in a neutralizer and the eluates were assayed (1, 9, 11, 12). The neutralizer consisted of 1% dextrose (Difco), 0.7% lecithin (Alfa Aesar), 0.25% sodium bisulfite (J. T. Baker), 0.1% sodium thioglycolate (Sigma), 0.6% sodium thiosulfate (Analar), 0.2% l-cysteine (Sigma), 0.5% tryptone (Oxoid), and 0.1% Tween 80 (Bioshop) in buffered saline (pH 7.2). In each experiment, three control and three test carriers were used, and all experiments were repeated thrice. The performance criteria for the tested substances were ≥3.0 log10 reduction in PFU of the virus and ≥6.0 log10 reductions in the CFU for the other three organisms. When the mixture of test organisms was used, the components were separated by first passing the mixture through a membrane filter (0.22-μm pore diameter) to retain all the organisms except the virus. The filtrate was subjected to plaque assays for HAV in FRhK-4 cells. For the three bacteria, separate filters were placed on appropriate agar plates (Table 1) and incubated.

The data for 5-min contact are given in Table 2. All levels of the disinfectants tested met the criterion for M. terrae and A. baumannii when tested individually or in mixture. Only 1,000 ppm of PAA was effective against the spores. Both levels of PAA were ineffective against HAV, while the other disinfectants could reduce its titer between 3.5 and 4 log10. Only 1,000 ppm of PAA could consistently meet the criterion for sporicidal activity after 10 min (data not shown). Extending the contact time to 20 min allowed both levels of PAA and DB to meet the criterion for sporicidal activity, while 500 ppm of CD failed to do so; CD at 1,000 ppm barely met the criterion when tested alone against the spores but could not do so in the mixture (Fig. 1).

The study showed the feasibility of testing liquid chemicals against a mixture of suitable surrogates for infectious bioagents. This approach allowed standardized and simultaneous assessment of the spectrum of microbicidal activities of the test formulations under identical conditions that better simulate field conditions and that can be readily adapted to test foams and gaseous chemicals on other carrier materials. The surrogates selected covered the spectrum of microbicide resistances of all currently known classes of infectious bioagents.

A. baumannii is among the more environmentally stable and microbicide-resistant vegetative bacteria known (7, 13). M. terrae represented pathogens with generally higher resistance to microbicides (3) and possibly drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and category C agents (6). HAV, a small, nonenveloped virus known for its stability and microbicide resistance (9), represented select agents (CBW, biological weapons classification, 2001 [http://www.selectagents.gov/Select%20Agents%20and%20Toxins%20List.html ]) and also food- and waterborne pathogens listed as biothreats (2, 10). The spores of G. stearothermophilus may be more resistant to oxidizing chemicals than the spores of Bacillus anthracis (8); their thermophilic nature made them safer to handle and easy to separate from the mixtures.

The disinfectants were selected for their commercial availability and broad-spectrum and relatively rapid action (5, 14). The last criterion excluded all but oxidizers because other common active agents are limited as microbicides and/or require hours of contact for sporicidal action.

For PAA tests, the recovery of infectious HAV in the absence of any viable spores is somewhat anomalous but not surprising. While we do not believe HAV to be more resistant than bacterial spores, the small size of the virus in the dried inocula likely afforded it significant protection. Compared to HAV, the mycobacterium proved more susceptible to all the disinfectants tested. This highlights a serious weakness in the traditional rankings of disinfectant susceptibility, where mycobacteria are often considered more resistant than nonenveloped viruses (5, 14).

In the initial trials with the mixtures, the titer of A. baumannii dropped sharply; using virus pools without antibiotics resolved the issue. The ability of A. baumannii to grow on 7H11 agar and thus interfere with the recovery of M. terrae was addressed by replacing the standard strain of M. terrae with one containing a kanamycin resistance gene (15). Incorporation of enough kanamycin in 7H11 suppressed the growth of A. baumannii while allowing the mycobacterium to grow.

Using a mixture of surrogates in QCT not only proved feasible but also highlighted the need to review certain long-held concepts about the relative sensitivities of classes of pathogens to disinfectants. The details reported should allow extension of the work to CL-3 and possibly CL-4 agents to confirm that the results obtained with the carefully chosen surrogates are indeed applicable to various classes of infectious bioagents.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Reductions of G. stearothermophilus spores by the test formulations after 20 min of contact, individually and in a mixture at 22 ± 2°C.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Organisms in the mixture and their growth/recovery media and titers

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Reductions by the test formulations in 5 min at 22 ± 2°C when tested against each organism individually and in a mixture

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant (04-00118RD) from the CRTI program of Defense R&D Canada.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 January 2010.
    • Accepted 5 July 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    ASTM. 2009. Standard quantitative disk carrier test method to determine the bactericidal, virucidal, fungicidal, mycobactericidal and sporicidal activities of liquid chemical germicides; standard E-2197. Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  2. 2.↵
    Boone, S. A., and C. P. Gerba. 2007. Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral diseases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73:1687-1696.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Falkinham, J. O., III. 2009. Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J. Appl. Microbiol.107:356-367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Mbithi, J. N., V. S. Springthorpe, and S. A. Sattar. 1990. Chemical disinfection of hepatitis A virus on environmental surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56:3601-3604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    McDonnell, G., and A. D. Russell. 1999. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.12:147-179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Morse, S. A., R. B. Kellogg, S. Perry, R. F. Meyer, D. Bray, D. Nichelson, and J. M. Miller. 2003. Detecting biothreat agents: the laboratory response network. ASM News69:433-437.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Peleg, A. Y., H. Seifert, and D. L. Paterson. 2008. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.21:538-582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Rogers, J. V., C. L. K. Sabourin, Y. W. Chol, W. R. Richter, D. C. Rudnicki, K. B. Riggs, M. L. Taylor, and J. Chang. 2005. Decontamination assessment of Bacillus anthracis,Bacillus subtilis, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores on indoor surfaces using a hydrogen peroxide gas generator. J. Appl. Microbiol.99:739-748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Sattar, S. A., V. S. Springthorpe, O. Adegbunrin, A. A. Zafer, and M. Busa. 2003. A disc-based quantitative carrier test method to assess the virucidal activity of chemical germicides. J. Virol. Methods112:3-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Sattar, S. A. 2007. Hierarchy of susceptibility of viruses to environmental surface disinfectants: a predictor of activity against new and emerging viral pathogens. J. AOAC Int.90:1655-1658.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Springthorpe, V. S., and S. A. Sattar. 2003. Quantitative carrier tests (QCT) to assess the germicidal activities of chemicals: rationale and procedures. Centre for Research on Environmental Microbiology, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  12. 12.↵
    Springthorpe, V. S., and S. A. Sattar. 2005. Carrier tests to assess microbicidal activities of chemical disinfectants for use on medical devices and environmental surfaces. J. AOAC Int.88:182-201.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    van den Broek, P. J., T. J. K. van der Reijden, E. van Strijen, A. V. Helmig-Schurter, A. T. Bernards, and L. Dijkshoorn. 2009. Endemic and epidemic Acinetobacter species in a university hospital: an 8-year survey. J. Clin. Microbiol.47:3593-3599.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Weber, D. J., and W. A. Rutala. 2006. Use of germicides in the home and the healthcare setting: is there a relationship between germicide use and antibiotic resistance? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.27:1107-1119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Zafer, A. A., Y. E. Taylor, and S. A Sattar. 2001. Rapid screening method for mycobactericidal activity of chemical germicides that uses Mycobacterium terrae expressing a green fluorescent protein gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67:1239-1245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Use of a Mixture of Surrogates for Infectious Bioagents in a Standard Approach to Assessing Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces
Safaa Sabbah, Susan Springthorpe, Syed A. Sattar
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2010, 76 (17) 6020-6022; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00246-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of a Mixture of Surrogates for Infectious Bioagents in a Standard Approach to Assessing Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Use of a Mixture of Surrogates for Infectious Bioagents in a Standard Approach to Assessing Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces
Safaa Sabbah, Susan Springthorpe, Syed A. Sattar
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2010, 76 (17) 6020-6022; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00246-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Acinetobacter baumannii
disinfection
environmental microbiology
Geobacillus stearothermophilus
Hepatitis A virus
nontuberculous mycobacteria

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336