Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public Health Microbiology

Seasonal Retention and Release of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Environmental Biofilms in the Laboratory

E. A. Wolyniak, B. R. Hargreaves, K. L. Jellison
E. A. Wolyniak
1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eaw205@lehigh.edu
B. R. Hargreaves
1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. L. Jellison
2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01804-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Seasonal changes in oocyst retention by biofilms using a standard laboratory water temperature (20 to 25°C). The cumulative percentage of oocysts associated with the biofilm over time for summer, fall, winter, and spring biofilm cultures was determined. Error bars show the percent standard error (n = 2) and are smaller than the symbols where not visible. The black line on the time axis indicates the period of oocyst dosing (0 to 72 h).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Testing the effect of experimental water temperature on oocyst retention by biofilm. The cumulative percentage of oocysts associated with the biofilm over time with winter culture biofilm grown at 5°C (ambient biofilm collection temperature) and at 20 to 25°C (normal laboratory experimental temperature) was determined. Error bars indicate the percent standard error (n = 2) and are smaller than the symbols where not visible. The black line on the time axis indicates the period of oocyst dosing (0 to 72 h).

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Cumulative percentage of oocysts associated with the biofilm at the end of oocyst dosing (day 3) and the end of the experiment (day 8). The error bars indicate the percent standard error (n = 2).

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Effect of changing flow media on oocyst retention by biofilm. The cumulative percentage of oocysts associated with the biofilm over time with fall biofilm grown with fall water, fall biofilm grown with spring water, spring biofilm grown with fall water, and spring biofilm grown with spring water was determined. The error bars show the percent standard error (n = 2) and are smaller than the symbols where not visible. The black line on the time axis indicates the period of oocyst dosing (0 to 72 h).

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Correlation of several water quality measures and oocyst retention by biofilms. The percentages of oocysts attached to biofilms at day 3 and day 8 versus water temperature at the time of biofilm collection (A), pH (B), conductivity (C), and DOC concentration (D) were determined. Spearman correlation coefficients and P values for each parameter are indicated on each panel.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Oocyst retention and biofilm thicknessa

    Season% Oocysts ± SEAvg biofilm thickness (μm)
    In biofilm at end of dosing (day 3)In biofilm at end of expt (day 8)Accounted for in flow system
    Summer 200864 ± 3.228 ± 0.05107 ± 0.9342 ± 3.5
    Fall 200846 ± 4.524 ± 0.67104 ± 028 ± 5.1
    Winter 200972 ± 0.8947 ± 3.297.5 ± 0.5134 ± 10
    Spring 200978 ± 1.465 ± 1.794.5 ± 0.5325 ± 11
    Winter 2009 (20°C)77 ± 0.6254 ± 1.494.5 ± 1.630 ± 12
    Winter 2009 (5°C)76 ± 0.3153 ± 2.7103.5 ± 0.4833 ± 11
    • ↵ a The table presents a summary of the percentage of oocysts attached to each biofilm at the end of the dosing period (day 3) and end of the experiment (day 8), the total percent of oocysts accounted for in the flow system, and the average biofilm thickness for each set of seasonal biofilms. All errors are percent standard error (n = 2, except biofilm thickness, where n = 8).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Seasonal Retention and Release of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Environmental Biofilms in the Laboratory
E. A. Wolyniak, B. R. Hargreaves, K. L. Jellison
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2010, 76 (4) 1021-1027; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01804-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Seasonal Retention and Release of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Environmental Biofilms in the Laboratory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Seasonal Retention and Release of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Environmental Biofilms in the Laboratory
E. A. Wolyniak, B. R. Hargreaves, K. L. Jellison
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2010, 76 (4) 1021-1027; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01804-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

biofilms
Cryptosporidium parvum
Fresh Water

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336