Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Biotechnology

Production of Glutaconic Acid in a Recombinant Escherichia coli Strain

Ivana Djurdjevic, Oskar Zelder, Wolfgang Buckel
Ivana Djurdjevic
1Laboratorium für Mikrobiologie, Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universität, 35032 Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oskar Zelder
2BASF SE, Fermentation Products Research, GVF/D-A30, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Buckel
1Laboratorium für Mikrobiologie, Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universität, 35032 Marburg, Germany
3Max-Planck-Institut für terrestrische Mikrobiologie, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: buckel@staff.uni-marburg.de
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02049-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The assembly of six genes that encode enzymes from glutamate-fermenting bacteria converted Escherichia coli into a glutaconate producer when grown anaerobically on a complex medium. The new anaerobic pathway starts with 2-oxoglutarate from general metabolism and proceeds via (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, (R)-2-hydroxyglutaryl-coenzyme A (CoA), and (E)-glutaconyl-CoA to yield 2.7 ± 0.2 mM (E)-glutaconate in the medium.

Glutaconic acid, or (E)-pentene-1,5-dioic acid, is an unsaturated C5-dicarboxylic acid (Fig. 1) that can be reduced to the saturated glutaric acid (pentane-1,5-dioic acid), from which its name was derived. In the chemical industry, both acids have the potential to be used as monomers for biodegradable polyesters. Glutaconic acid might be additionally applied for the formation of polyamides by condensation with suitable α,ω-diaminoalkanes (12). The ideal material for biological production of glutaconic acid would be glutamic acid obtained by sugar fermentation. The α,β elimination of ammonia from glutamate to glutaconate, however, is chemically not feasible. Nevertheless, some anaerobic bacteria, such as Acidaminococcus fermentans and Clostridium symbiosum, catalyze this reaction in five steps during the fermentation of glutamate to ammonia, CO2, acetate, butyrate, and molecular hydrogen (7). This pathway converts glutamate to ammonia and 2-oxoglutarate, followed by an NADH-dependent reduction to (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate (14). Glutaconate coenzyme A (CoA)-transferase mediates the activation to (R)-2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA (8), and an oxygen-sensitive [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing radical enzyme catalyzes the dehydration of this α-hydroxythioester to the α,β-unsaturated thioester, (E)-glutaconyl-CoA (Fig. 1) (15). To convert Escherichia coli into a glutaconate producer, we expressed six genes in this organism encoding 2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase (HgdH) (14), glutaconate CoA-transferase (GctAB) (13), and the activator of the dehydratase (HgdC) from A. fermentans (10), as well as 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase (HgdAB) from C. symbiosum (11). The new pathway diverts from central metabolism at 2-oxoglutarate (Fig. 1).

The first step was the construction of the plasmid pID-3, derived from pACYCDuet-1 (Novagene), which comprises three genes coding for 2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase (hgdH) and glutaconate CoA-transferase (gctAB). A second plasmid, pID-4, derived from the pASK-IBA3plus vector, harbors the genes of the activator of 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase (hgdC) from A. fermentans and 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase (hgdAB) from C. symbiosum. E. coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with the plasmids pID-3 and pID-4, resulting in the new recombinant strain E. coli ID-5 (16). The strain was grown anaerobically at 25°C for 3 h until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.2, induced with 1.0 mM isopropylthiogalactoside and 0.5 μM anhydrotetracycline, and grown for a further 3 h to an OD600 of 0.6. The Standard I medium (1.5% peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM glucose; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) contained carbenicillin (100 μg·ml−1) and chloramphenicol (50 μg·ml−1). It was supplemented with 50 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS), 3 mM cysteine hydrochloride, 10 mM Na-glutamate, 0.2 mM riboflavin, and 2 mM Fe(III) citrate, pH 7.4 (supplemented Standard I medium). No growth was observed on medium in which peptone and yeast extract was omitted.

Analysis by SDS-PAGE of the cell extract (100,000 × g, supernatant) and the pellet revealed, in both fractions, thick protein bands that were absent without induction. Spectrophotometric assays of the specific activities of the enzymes gave the following results: HgdH, 150 U mg−1 protein (4); GctAB, 0.25 U mg−1 (8); and HgdCAB, 0.46 U mg−1 (15). In the absence of the supplements glutamate, riboflavin, and Fe(III) citrate in the medium, the activity of HgdCAB was only 0.08 U mg−1 whereas those of the two other enzymes remained unchanged. Riboflavin and Fe are required for synthesis of 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase and its activator, which contain riboflavin-5′-phosphate (FMN) and three [4Fe-4S] clusters as prosthetic groups (10). Hence, the expression of the six genes appeared to be successful.

The production of glutaconate in the medium was determined enzymatically and by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The enzymatic method used acetyl-CoA, glutaconate CoA-transferase (8), glutaconyl-CoA decarboxylase (6), and the NADPH-dependent crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase (9). HPLC was performed at 50°C using a C18 reverse-phase column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM sulfuric acid with UV detection at 205 nm. Both assays demonstrated that glutaconate was indeed produced. After growth for 8 to 20 h, the concentration of glutaconate increased from 0.1 mM (Standard I medium) via 0.3 mM (addition of 10 mM glutamate) to 2.7 ± 0.2 mM (supplemented Standard I medium) (Fig. 2). From measurements of the extract from cells harvested after 20 h, the cytoplasmatic glutaconate concentration was calculated as 16 mM by assuming an internal volume of 2.4 ml g−1 dry cells (1, 5). Hence, the export of glutaconate could be one of the rate-limiting steps. As shown in Fig. 2, glucose (5 mM) (2) was almost stoichiometrically converted to ethanol (8.7 ± 0.2 mM) (3), indicating that glutaconate was mainly produced from another carbon source, either peptone, yeast extract, or citrate. Surprisingly, this source was not glutamate, because the concentration of this essential amino acid (18) initially decreased but recovered to the original value of 13 mM when the concentration of glutaconate reached its maximum. A similar behavior of the glutamate concentration was also observed with the “wild-type” E. coli strain, indicating that the concentration of the most abundant compound in the cell (1) is tightly regulated.

In summary, the data demonstrate that the biological production of glutaconate is possible (I. Jurdjevic, O. Zelder, and W. Buckel, 22 July 2010, patent application, publication no. WO/2010/081885, German Patent and Trade Mark Office). To reach higher concentrations, however, many parameters need to be optimized, e.g., the glucose concentration, expression of the gctAB and hgdCAB genes, attenuation of ethanol production, and facilitation of glutaconate export. A further goal is the reduction of glutaconyl-CoA to glutaryl-CoA, possibly by expressing the gene coding for the nondecarboxylating glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (17). This could lead to a glutarate-producing strain.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Proposed pathway of glutaconate production. The genes coding for the following enzymes have been introduced into E. coli: HgdH, GctAB, and HgdCAB.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Growth of the recombinant E. coli strain ID-5 in the supplemented Standard I medium. The arrow indicates the time of induction with isopropylthiogalactoside and anhydrotetracycline. Growth was measured as the OD at 578 nm.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Marco Hornung, Max-Planck-Institut, for excellent technical assistance and Iris Schall, Philipps-Universität, for the hgdH gene and initial help with cloning and auxiliary enzyme purification.

The work was supported by grants from BASF and Zentrum für synthetische Mikrobiologie (SYNMIKRO), Philipps-Universität.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 31 August 2010.
    • Accepted 25 October 2010.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 29 October 2010.
  • Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bennett, B. D., E. H. Kimball, M. Gao, R. Osterhout, S. J. Van Dien, and J. D. Rabinowitz. 2009. Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:593-599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bergmeyer, H. U., and E. Bernt. 1974. D-Glucose, p. 1241-1278. In H. U. Bergmeyer (ed.), Methods of enzymatic analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Bernt, E., and I. Gutmann. 1974. Äthanol, p. 1545-1548. In H. U. Bergmeyer (ed.), Methods of enzymatic analysis, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Bresser, J. 1997. (R)-2-Hydroxyglutarat-Dehydrogenase aus Acidaminococcus fermentans. Master's thesis. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  5. 5.↵
    Brock, M., and W. Buckel. 2004. On the mechanism of action of the antifungal agent propionate. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:3227-3241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Buckel, W. 1986. Biotin-dependent decarboxylases as bacterial sodium pumps: purification and reconstitution of glutaconyl-CoA decarboxylase from Acidaminococcus fermentans. Methods Enzymol. 125:547-558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Buckel, W. 2001. Unusual enzymes involved in five pathways of glutamate fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 57:263-273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Buckel, W., U. Dorn, and R. Semmler. 1981. Glutaconate CoA-transferase from Acidaminococcus fermentans. Eur. J. Biochem. 118:315-321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Erb, T. J., I. A. Berg, V. Brecht, M. Müller, G. Fuchs, and B. E. Alber. 2007. Synthesis of C5-dicarboxylic acids from C2-units involving crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase: the ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:10631-10636.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Hans, M., W. Buckel, and E. Bill. 2000. The iron-sulfur clusters in 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase from Acidaminococcus fermentans. Biochemical and spectroscopic investigations. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:7082-7093.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Hans, M., J. Sievers, U. Müller, E. Bill, J. A. Vorholt, D. Linder, and W. Buckel. 1999. 2-Hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase from Clostridium symbiosum. Eur. J. Biochem. 265:404-414.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Kind, S., W. K. Jeong, H. Schröder, and C. Wittmann. 2010. Systems-wide metabolic pathway engineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum for bio-based production of diaminopentane. Metab. Eng. 12:341-351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Mack, M., K. Bendrat, O. Zelder, E. Eckel, D. Linder, and W. Buckel. 1994. Location of the two genes encoding glutaconate coenzyme A-transferase at the beginning of the hydroxyglutarate operon in Acidaminococcus fermentans. Eur. J. Biochem. 226:41-51.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Martins, B. M., S. Macedo-Ribeiro, J. Bresser, W. Buckel, and A. Messerschmidt. 2005. Structural basis for stereo-specific catalysis in NAD+-dependent (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase from Acidaminococcus fermentans. FEBS J. 272:269-281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Parthasarathy, A., W. Buckel, and D. M. Smith. 2010. On the thermodynamic equilibrium between (R)-2-hydroxyacyl-CoA and 2-enoyl-CoA. FEBS J. 277:1738-1746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  17. 17.↵
    Wischgoll, S., U. Demmer, E. Warkentin, R. Günther, M. Boll, and U. Ermler. 2010. Structural basis for promoting and preventing decarboxylation in glutaryl-coenzyme A dehydrogenases. Biochemistry 49:5350-5357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Wohlfarth, G., and W. Buckel. 1985. A sodium ion gradient as energy source for Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus. Arch. Microbiol. 142:128-135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Production of Glutaconic Acid in a Recombinant Escherichia coli Strain
Ivana Djurdjevic, Oskar Zelder, Wolfgang Buckel
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 2010, 77 (1) 320-322; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02049-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Production of Glutaconic Acid in a Recombinant Escherichia coli Strain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Production of Glutaconic Acid in a Recombinant Escherichia coli Strain
Ivana Djurdjevic, Oskar Zelder, Wolfgang Buckel
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 2010, 77 (1) 320-322; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02049-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336