Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Physiology

Evidence for Direct Electron Transfer by a Gram-Positive Bacterium Isolated from a Microbial Fuel Cell

K. C. Wrighton, J. C. Thrash, R. A. Melnyk, J. P. Bigi, K. G. Byrne-Bailey, J. P. Remis, D. Schichnes, M. Auer, C. J. Chang, J. D. Coates
K. C. Wrighton
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
2Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. C. Thrash
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
3Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. A. Melnyk
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. P. Bigi
4Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. G. Byrne-Bailey
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. P. Remis
6Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Schichnes
7College of Natural Resources Biological Imaging Facility, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Auer
6Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. J. Chang
4Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. D. Coates
1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jdcoates@berkeley.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05365-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Despite their importance in iron redox cycles and bioenergy production, the underlying physiological, genetic, and biochemical mechanisms of extracellular electron transfer by Gram-positive bacteria remain insufficiently understood. In this work, we investigated respiration by Thermincola potens strain JR, a Gram-positive isolate obtained from the anode surface of a microbial fuel cell, using insoluble electron acceptors. We found no evidence that soluble redox-active components were secreted into the surrounding medium on the basis of physiological experiments and cyclic voltammetry measurements. Confocal microscopy revealed highly stratified biofilms in which cells contacting the electrode surface were disproportionately viable relative to the rest of the biofilm. Furthermore, there was no correlation between biofilm thickness and power production, suggesting that cells in contact with the electrode were primarily responsible for current generation. These data, along with cryo-electron microscopy experiments, support contact-dependent electron transfer by T. potens strain JR from the cell membrane across the 37-nm cell envelope to the cell surface. Furthermore, we present physiological and genomic evidence that c-type cytochromes play a role in charge transfer across the Gram-positive bacterial cell envelope during metal reduction.

INTRODUCTION

Microbial metal metabolism has significant medical, environmental, and industrial importance. Assimilatory Fe(III) reduction impacts pathogen physiology and virulence in phylogenetically diverse bacteria (6, 51), while dissimilatory metal reduction is central to biogeochemical processes. Specifically, mesophilic dissimilatory metal reduction impacts the bioattenuation of various contaminants (12), while reduction at elevated temperatures has been associated with the formation of corrosive products in heated delivery systems and organic carbon mineralization in deep petroleum reservoirs (54). Additionally, the mechanisms involved in dissimilatory metal reduction are critical to power production in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) (32, 47).

Fe(III) oxides and Mn(IV) oxides are insoluble at circumneutral pH and, like anodic electrodes, must be reduced extracellularly. As such, dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria (DMRB) must complete the circuit between the respiratory electron transport chain located in the plasma membrane and the insoluble electron acceptor located outside the cell (58). Despite the phylogenetic diversity of DMRB, knowledge of electron transfer mechanisms is largely confined to two model Gram-negative bacterial genera, Geobacter and Shewanella. The extracellular electron transfer mechanisms utilized by these bacteria involve either contact-dependent or contact-independent strategies. Contact-dependent (direct) mechanisms transfer electrons via multiheme cytochrome c proteins (MHCs) (53, 58) or nanowires (22, 48). In contrast, contact-independent mechanisms involve soluble redox-active mediators that shuttle electrons from the electron transport chain to the insoluble electron acceptor (23, 57).

Compared to Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria lack an outer membrane, have a thicker cell wall (10 to 80 nm), and may be encased in a glycoprotein S layer. Due to these structural differences, direct electron transfer to insoluble electron acceptors was once considered incompatible with a Gram-positive bacterial envelope (45). Here we present a study on the use of insoluble electron acceptors by a Gram-positive bacterium, Thermincola potens strain JR. This bacterium was isolated from a current-producing anodic biofilm and in pure culture was demonstrated to respire 91% of the electrons in acetate to current (59). Using electrochemical, physiological, and imaging methods, we confirm that T. potens participates in direct extracellular electron transfer. Furthermore, we present genomic evidence that c-type cytochromes are abundant in T. potens and physiological verification that c-type cytochromes are capable of charge transfer to extracellular electron acceptors. Taken together, our findings have broad implications for understanding the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity fundamental to environmental redox cycles, pathogenesis, and sustainable bioenergy applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Phylogenetic analysis.Genomic DNA of strain JR was isolated from pure cultures using a PowerSoil kit (MoBio) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified as described previously (59). Sequences were aligned with the MUSCLE (version 3.6) program (14) and analyzed with MrBayes (version 3.2) software (25, 50) using 4 chains until the standard deviation of the split frequencies was stabilized below 0.01, in this case, for 1,087,000 generations, with a sample frequency of 1,000. The first 25% of the samples were discarded for accurate estimation of the posterior probability distribution of the summary tree.

Geothrix fermentans (GenBank accession number U41563) and Acidobacteria capsulatum (GenBank accession number D26171) were selected as representative acidobacteria; Geobacter metallireducens strain GS-15 (GenBank accession number L07834) and Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 (GenBank accession number AF005251) were chosen as representative proteobacteria. The 16S rRNA GenBank accession number for Thermincola potens strain JR is GU815244. Accession numbers for additional Firmicutes used for the analysis were EU016427, EU016431, EU016410, EU016421, EU016442, EU016420, EU016424, EU016416, EU016422, EU016418, EU016409, EU016435, EU016425, EU016448, EU194832, EU194831, EU194830, EU638403, EU638851, EU638690, EU638872, EU638393, EU638902, EU638687, EU639376, EU638700, EU638698, EU638838, EU638794, EU638786, EU638783, EU638810, EU638644, AB159558, AB154390, AB232785, AB091323, X91169, AY631277, AY603000, EF542810, U76363, AJ621886, Y11575, DQ148942, AF516177, AJ276351, X61138, AJ575812, AB075768, and X81021.

MFC construction and operation.The MFC was constructed with two 50-mm-diameter glass chambers with three sample ports connected with a 30-mm pinch clamp assembly (Laboratory Glass Apparatus, Berkeley, CA). Chambers were separated with a cation-exchange membrane (Nafion 117). The electrodes were either graphite blocks or graphite carbon fiber. For graphite blocks, unpolished graphite 2.5 by 1.25 by 7.5 cm (G-10 Graphite Engineering and Sales, Greenville, MI) was connected with watertight threaded fittings (Impulse, San Diego, CA) to wires and sealed with conductive silver epoxy (Epoxy Technology, Billerica, MA). For graphite fiber electrodes, graphite fiber (G-10 Graphite Engineering and Sales, Greenville, MI) was trimmed into rectangles (2.5 by 7.5 cm). For both electrode versions, electrodes were connected to resistors (470 Ω) through stoppers in the top of each chamber. Voltage (Ecell or cell potential) was measured across a fixed external resistor (Rext) and logged using Chart (version 4.0) software (ADInstruments, CA). With the exception of the medium-swap experiments, data were recorded every 10 min. Current (I) was calculated from measured voltages using Ohm's law (I = Ecell/Rext). Maximum overall power was calculated as Ecell2 maximum/Rext. Coulombic efficiency, or the electrons in acetate that are recovered as current, was calculated in duplicate, and the mean value is reported. Additional images and details are included elsewhere (59).

Prior to inoculation with strain JR, the chambers, electrodes, and all stoppers were autoclaved to ensure sterility. The anodic chamber was aseptically filled with 250 ml of presterilized, anoxic, 30 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 6.8) amended with 10 mM acetate as the sole electron donor, while the cathodic chamber was aseptically filled with 250 ml of 30 mM Tris buffer (pH 6.8). The anode chamber was bubbled continuously with filtered (pore size, 0.22 μm) N2-CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) gas to ensure anoxic operation and maintenance of pH throughout operation, while the cathode chamber was bubbled continuously with filtered air (pore size, 0.22 μm). Anode compartments were maintained at 60°C over the course of the experiments using heated water jackets surrounding the anode.

Microbiological methods.Unless otherwise noted, cultures were maintained at 60°C on 30 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 6.8) freshwater medium with the N2-CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) headspace amended with 10 mM acetate and 100 mM amorphous hydrous Fe(III) oxide (HFO) (33). To evaluate the electrochemical activity of Thermincola potens strain JR, pure cultures were washed and inoculated into the MFC. Cells were grown anaerobically at 60°C in 1-liter volumes using acetate (10 mM) as the electron donor and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS; 10 mM) as the electron acceptor, standard anoxic techniques, and basal bicarbonate medium. Bacterial cells were harvested upon reduction of AQDS by centrifugation under an anoxic atmosphere, washed once, and resuspended in 10 ml basal bicarbonate medium in an anaerobic glove bag. The cell suspension was anoxically and aseptically added to the anode compartment of MFCs.

Microscopy.For cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and cytochrome scans, cells grown in 1 liter medium containing AQDS and acetate (10 mM each) were centrifuged (8,000 × g, 10 min) and resuspended in 1 ml piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) buffer (pH 7.0) with N2 headspace. Cryo-EM images were acquired at a ×20,000 magnification on a JEOL-3100 electron microscope with an underfocus value of 10 μm. The microscope was equipped with an FEG electron source operating at 300 kV, an Omega energy filter, a Gatan 795 2,000- by 2,000-pixel charge-coupled-device camera, and a cryotransfer stage. The stage and sample were cooled to 80 K for the duration of data collection. Cells were placed onto lacey carbon grids (01881; Ted Pella) that were pretreated by glow discharge. The grids were blotted and plunged into liquid C2H6 using a Vitrobot FEI automated vitrification device before being transferred and stored in liquid N2 until imaged.

To visually examine strain JR biofilms using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CSLM), three separate portions (2 cm2) located on spatially distinct regions of the carbon cloth anode were aseptically and anoxically removed from two separate current-producing MFCs. Anode portions were dipped in freshwater medium to remove debris loosely associated with the biofilm and were fluorescently stained with 1× SYTO BC and 2 μg/ml propidium iodide. Biofilm structures were immediately examined using an inverted LSM710 (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) microscope equipped with a ×63 magnification, 1.2-numerical-aperture water immersion lens. To ensure that the biofilm structure was not compressed, the sample was placed biofilm side down into a MatTek dish with a 1.5 coverslip bottom. Image stacks were acquired with the pinhole set to 1 Airy unit, allowing in 1.1 μm of light in the z dimension. Images were acquired at every 0.55 μm in the z dimension, in accordance with Nyquist sampling. Two- and three-dimensional images were obtained, and green- and red-stained cells were quantified using Imaris (version 6.2) software (Bitplane, AG).

Search for redox-active mediators.The role played by biofilm-independent processes was evaluated using a medium-replacement experiment. Here, the medium in the anode was removed daily (n = 5; to minimize concerns of nutrient carryover, only the findings for the last 3 time points are reported) and the anode biofilm and chamber were rinsed with 30 mM bicarbonate buffer three times at each replacement. Chambers were refilled with anoxic sterile medium (10 mM acetate) lacking vitamins and minerals to remove any growth and putative redox-active components. Current production was recorded every 10 s over the course of the experiment.

The accumulation of soluble mediators in the medium surrounding the anode was also evaluated using spent-medium experiments. Culture broth was obtained from duplicate current-producing anodes (operated for 8 weeks in batch format to concentrate secreted metabolites), centrifuged (8,000 × g, 20 min) to remove cell debris, and made anoxic. Filters were not used to avoid losing organic molecules by adsorption. Conditioned medium was added (final concentration, 80%) to 100 mM HFO and 10 mM acetate-amended bicarbonate fresh water medium. Three conditioned medium-free controls were also run in parallel: 10 mM acetate, 100 mM HFO, and 10 μm AQDS (positive control), no donor and 100 mM HFO (negative control), and 10 mM acetate and 100 mM HFO (spent-medium control). A 10% inoculum was used, with Fe(II) production monitored in triplicate for each treatment (33).

Cyclic voltammetry (CV), using BASi's Epsilon potentiostat and C-3 cell stand (West Lafayette, IN), was performed on anode culture medium and rinsed biofilm samples (scan rate, 2 mV/s), with voltammograms for each included (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Thirty milliliters anode medium was removed, and washed biofilms were collected (times of 0, 4, and 12 weeks from the time of current stabilization). Samples were kept anoxic in tinfoil-wrapped bottles at 60°C. The working electrode was a glassy carbon disk (diameter, 3.0 mm), the counterelectrode was a platinum wire, and the solutions were referenced with an aqueous Ag/AgCl electrode purchased from BASi. The working electrode was cleaned prior to use with polishing alumina (particle size, 0.05 μm). Electrochemical cells were dried at 160°C and cooled to room temperature under a flow of N2. Aqueous samples (5 ml) were kept anoxic (N2) during CV, with medium temperature and pH quantified immediately before and after each voltammogram to ensure measurement under biologically relevant conditions. As a positive control, CV was performed on cell-free samples spiked with stock solutions of riboflavin and AQDS (scan rates, 2, 100, and 1,000 mV/s). The increased scan rate was necessary for riboflavin samples to account for adsorbed redox species (35).

Cytochrome c analysis.The presence, predicted protein length, presence of signal peptide/transmembrane, and homology of MHCs were confirmed by genome sequencing of T. potens strain JR (8). Analysis using the BLASTP program was performed against the entire nr database on 2 November 2009 (1). Domain structures of the gene models were assembled by searching against the InterPro database (26). Transmembrane domains and signal peptides were identified using the web-based programs TMHMM (version 2.0) and SignalP (version 3.0), respectively (2, 27). The c-type cytochrome complement of strain JR was identified with the aid of the HMMER (version 3.0b3) software package (13), using the doubled-heme-domain Pfam profile PF09699 (17) as the input profile.

To evaluate capacity for electron transfer to iron(III) oxides by c-type cytochromes, spectrophotometric analyses were performed in triplicate in an anoxic glove bag using a Varian Cary 50 MPR UV/visible microplate spectrophotometer (Varian Inc., CA). Whole cells were diluted to approximately 0.11 mg · ml−1 total protein in 30 mM phosphate buffer and titrated with small amounts of 0.5 M sodium dithionite until reduction of the c-type cytochromes was observed (1 to 3 μl was required). Subsequently, aliquots of 0.15 M HFO were added (3 to 6 μl), and the oxidation spectrum was rerecorded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Thermincola potens strain JR is phylogenetically and morphologically Gram positive.Strain JR is a Firmicutes belonging to the Peptococcaceae in the Clostridiales by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (1,228 nucleotides; Fig. 1A). It shared 99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with T. carboxydophila and T. ferriacetica, the two previously characterized members of the Thermincola genus (55, 62). Outside of cultured representatives, 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses from MFC anodes (operated at 55°C) inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge (59) or marine sediment (36) were dominated by sequences 93 to 99% similar to the rRNA gene sequence of strain JR. In addition, stable isotope probing and 16S rRNA gene clone library studies revealed the prevalence and activity of sequences related to strain JR (92% identity) in mesophilic benzene-oxidizing Fe(III)-reducing mesocosms (28). Together, these results suggest a selective advantage for bacteria related to Thermincola in systems requiring external electron transfer.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(A) A 16S rRNA gene tree constructed using Bayesian analysis reveals that T. potens is a member of the Gram-positive bacterial phylum Firmicutes within the family Peptococcaceae. Closed circles at nodes indicate posterior probabilities of ≥0.97; the open circle indicates a posterior probability of <0.97. (B) Cryo-EM shows that the plasma membrane (PM) is enclosed by a 16-nm-thick low-density periplasmic space (PS) that is bound by a 17-nm-thick high-density cell wall (CW), indicative of a Gram-positive cell wall.

Cryo-EM confirmed that strain JR was morphologically Gram positive with a 33-nm-thick bipartite envelope that includes a 16-nm low-density periplasm surrounded by a 17-nm high-density cell wall (Fig. 1B). These results are consistent with those of previous studies of four mesophilic Gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus gallinarum, and Streptococcus gordonii (37). This cellular architecture has important ramifications for extracellular electron transfer by strain JR.

Evidence for direct electron transfer.As a first method for detecting secreted redox-active components by strain JR, we assessed the contribution of anodic biofilm-independent processes to MFC current production. The spent culture broth surrounding the anode was removed and replaced with fresh acetate-amended medium. Previously, this method demonstrated that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Geothrix fermentans produced soluble mediators, as described by a notable reduction in current (greater than 50%) and a lag (3 to 10 days) for current to return to original levels (5, 35). In contrast, with strain JR current recovered after medium replacement to original levels within 29 ± 15 min (n = 3) (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the rinsing and transfer of electrode biofilms to sterile anoxic MFCs had no impact on current production.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Evidence for contact-dependent electron transfer by T. potens. (A) Current production by strain JR returned to original levels 30 min after replacement of anode medium (n = 3). d, number of days. (B) Fe(III) oxide reduction coupled to acetate oxidation was not stimulated by amendment with 12-week-old cell-free spent medium (80%, vol/vol) from microbial fuel cells. Effects on the rate of iron reduction over time with the addition of 8 ml of either supernatant (○), basal medium (■), or 10 μM AQDS and basal medium (×). No significant reduction occurred in the absence of acetate (□). Mean results of triplicate cultures and standard errors are reported. (C) No detectable current production was detected in the subtracted difference between cell-free supernatant from a 12-week old current-generating MFC and control medium (blue line). MFC cell-free supernatant was spiked with 250 nM riboflavin (black line). SHE, standard hydrogen electrode.

As an alternative method for detecting the presence of endogenous shuttling compounds, we supplemented HFO-reducing cultures with cell-free spent anodic culture broth. Similar experiments with Shewanella algae strain BRY, Geothrix fermentans, and Pyrobaculum aerophilum demonstrate that endogenous mediators accumulate in conditioned culture broth such that addition of spent medium minimizes the lag phase associated with HFO reduction, increasing the initial ferric iron reduction rate relative to that for a non-spent-medium control (16, 41, 42). In strain JR, spent medium failed to stimulate the reduction of HFO (Fig. 2B). In contrast, when cells were supplemented with an exogenous electron shuttle (AQDS, 10 μM), initial HFO reduction occurred significantly faster than the rate for controls not amended with spent medium, indicating that strain JR could use soluble electron shuttles for transferring electrons onto iron hydroxides but that a soluble mediator does not accumulate in strain JR medium to a level physiologically detectable by the organism under these assay conditions.

For more sensitive detection of soluble redox-active mediators, we performed cyclic voltammetry (CV), previously used to characterize bacterial electron transfer mechanisms to electrodes (20, 24, 31, 35, 44, 46, 61). No electrochemical differences were evident between the spent MFC culture broth and an uninoculated control, indicating that redox-active components either were not present or were present at levels below the limit of detection (Fig. 2C; see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Likewise, CV performed on washed biofilms did not differ from that performed on sterile-medium controls. To determine the detection limits of the known redox-active mediators AQDS and riboflavin in this electrochemical system, we titrated these compounds into spent MFC culture medium prior to CV analysis (Fig. 2C). Both compounds were detectable at the appropriate midpoint potential, with conservative detection limits (100 and 200 nM, respectively) being below those reported for endogenous mediators from Shewanella in current-producing anodes (35).

The results from experiments presented here are in agreement with those for a Geobacter sp., a model organism for direct extracellular electron transfer, where medium exchange failed to impact current production (4), the addition of spent medium did not stimulate iron reduction (4, 9, 40), and CV failed to detect soluble redox-active components (56).

Lack of support for long-range electron transfer through anodic biofilms.CSLM with live-dead stain has previously been used to implicate long-range electron transfer by Geobacter sulfurreducens (19, 43, 49). We used CSLM to monitor temporal changes in strain JR biofilm thickness and viability on an anode surface. Once stable power production was achieved (7 to 10 days), CSLM revealed a 2-μm-high monolayer of 92% viable cells on the electrode surface (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). One month later, the electrode biofilm had grown 10-fold in height (22 μm ± 5 μm, n = 6), without a corresponding increase in current production (Fig. 3; see also Fig. S2C in the supplemental material). Quantified cell density and viability on the aged biofilm revealed a dense layer of viable cells in contact with the electrode surface, with the middle and top biofilm portions showing decreasing cell densities (−34% and −37%, respectively) and decreasing percentages of viable cells (−44% and −41%, respectively) of the biofilm relative to the cells on the anode surface (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy of T. potens anodic biofilm. The electrode surface is denoted by white arrows, with the topographic variation associated with carbon fiber weave being apparent. Three-dimensional rendering revealed a biofilm an average of 22 μm thick with a monolayer of viable (green) cells in contact with the electrode surface. Bar, 10 μm. Quantification of biofilm cross-section reveals a greater percentage of viable cells and a higher cell density associated with electrode surface.

The lack of correspondence between current production and biofilm height coupled to the decreased cell density and viability beyond the anode surface monolayer signifies that cells in contact with the electrode primarily contribute to current production. These results are opposed to the CSLM results obtained with G. sulfurreducens, where cells up to 50 μm from the electrode surface remain equally dense and viable, with current production correlated to biofilm height. It was suggested that while Geobacter cells in intimate contact with the anode surface may rely on electron transfer via outer membrane c-type cytochromes, nanowires were responsible for long-range transfer across the multilayer biofilm (43, 49). Keeping with this interpretation, the confocal microscopy results presented here suggest that T. potens strain JR does not have similar machinery for long-range electron transfer through the anodic biofilm.

Expression and metal reduction activity of c-type cytochromes.In direct extracellular electron transfer by S. oneidensis and G. sulfurreducens, MHCs located in the periplasm and outer membrane transport electrons generated from the inner membrane electron transport chain to the electron acceptor on the cell surface. The physiological significance of MHCs is evident in genomic data, with 23 and 69 MHCs annotated in S. oneidensis and G. sulfurreducens, respectively. Furthermore, the average numbers of predicted heme-binding motifs per MHC in genome-sequenced Shewanella and Geobacter species are 6.42 and 9.31, respectively, indicating their importance in charge transfer events (7, 38, 39, 43).

Analogous to the c-type cytochrome repertoire in Gram-negative organisms, the genome of strain JR contains 35 putative MHCs with an average of 11.9 hemes per cytochrome. We used a spectrophotometric approach to confirm the expression and inferred function for c-type cytochromes in strain JR. Reduced spectra minus HFO-oxidized spectra of whole cells showed absorption peaks at 420, 526, and 552 nm, corresponding to the gamma, beta, and alpha bands of c-type cytochromes, respectively (Fig. 4). The oxidation of c-type cytochromes by insoluble iron signifies that electrons from strain JR c-type cytochromes can be transferred to external electron acceptors in intact cells.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

T. potens cells grown on 10 mM AQDS express c-type cytochromes, which are capable of transferring electrons to extracellular electron acceptors, as revealed by the difference spectrum of strain JR whole cells of dithionite reduced and HFO oxidized with absorbance maxima at 426, 522, and 553 nm. Values on the x axis indicate absorbance wavelengths.

Direct extracellular electron transfer in Gram-positive bacteria.In addition to the work reported here, contact-dependent dissimilatory metal reduction has been identified in two Gram-positive DMRB. The inability of culture filtrate to augment HFO reduction was evidence that Thermoanaerobacter sp. strain BSB-33 fails to release extracellular redox mediators (3). Likewise, CV demonstrated that Thermincola ferriacetica employs a direct mechanism of electron transfer to MFC anodes (34). The shared mechanism of electron transfer to anodes between Thermincola spp. (Fig. 1A) is worth noting. Consistent with results obtained here, within the genus Geobacter, G. metallireducens and G. sulfurreducens both utilize a direct mechanism of extracellular electron transfer (4, 40). On the other hand, different strategies for insoluble Fe(III) reduction within a single genus exist for both Pyrobaculum and Shewanella genera (10).

T. potens strain JR is similar to Gram-negative DMRB capable of direct electron transfer in the number and heavy loading of heme motifs on MHCs; however, the relationship between MHCs and direct electron transfer has yet to be established in other Gram-positive DMRB. Diagnostic cytochrome spectra performed on two Gram-positive DMRB identified c-type cytochromes in Carboxydothermus ferrireducens (21) but not in Desulfitobacterium metallireducens (18). Comparative genomics of 594 prokaryote genomes revealed that Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans and Desulfitobacterium hafniense were the only Gram-positive DMRB to contain more than 10 MHCs, with 13 and 16, respectively (52). However, the ability of these bacteria to transfer electrons extracellularly has not been characterized at a mechanistic level.

Future directions.A key challenge facing researchers investigating external electron transfer is elucidating the molecular details of the reduction process. Although contact-dependent and -independent mechanisms of reduction are often presented to be distinct from one another, the extent to which they are exclusive or overlap is unclear (30, 35). Furthermore, it was also shown that Geobacter sulfurreducens uses a combination of direct mechanisms by aligning MHC proteins along pili to promote electron transfer to Fe(III) oxides (29). In T. potens, there is the additional unique problem of conducting electrons across the 17-nm-thick cell wall. We propose three molecular models to rationalize contact-dependent electron transfer in strain JR (60): (i) conductive cell appendages (nanowires), (ii) conductive cell walls (15), or (iii) a redox-active protein conduit linking the inner membrane to the cell surface.

Integrating MHCs into these models, we consider that in the conductive cell wall model, MHCs localized to the 16-nm-thick periplasmic space could function as terminal reductases. These MHCs would shuttle electrons from the plasma membrane to nonpeptide components of the cell wall, e.g., teichoic and teichuronic acids, which bind reversible metal ions or yet to be recognized components to convey electrons from the periplasmic MHCs to electron acceptors on the cell surface (15). An alternative or, possibly, complementary hypothesis considers that the cell wall could be hardwired with cytochromes, as Gram-positive bacteria have several methods for covalently and noncovalently attaching proteins to the peptidoglycan layer (11). Beyond the cell wall, the S layer is a protein matrix that could also be studded with MHCs and proteins that mediate attachment and electron transfer to insoluble electron acceptors.

With Thermincola potens JR as a model organism, we used a combination of physiological, electrochemical, and genomic observations to expand the knowledge of Gram-positive bacterial extracellular respiration. Our findings demonstrate that strain JR is capable of contact-dependent electron transfer to these electron acceptors, and while the molecular basis for this mechanism is presently not understood, implementation of additional technologies, such as biofilm CV, proteomics, and transcriptomics, will reveal how MHCs are functionally integrated into the physiology of strain JR. Ultimately, this research will elucidate the phylogenetic and physiological variation in bacterial electron transfer mechanisms and improve our understanding of the metabolism of Gram-positive bacteria with applications to pathogen physiology, bioremediation, and energy generation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding for this work was provided to J.D.C. through the DOE LDRD and the UCB SPS programs. K.C.W. was supported by a Tien Scholars Biodiversity Graduate Fellowship, and J.P.B. was supported by an NSF Graduate Fellowship. C.J.C. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.

We thank Steven Ruzin of the UCB Biological Imaging Facility.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 4 May 2011.
    • Accepted 1 September 2011.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 9 September 2011.
  • ↵† Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05365-11.

  • Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Altschul S. F.,
    2. et al
    . 1997. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bendtsen J. D.,
    2. von Heijne G. H. N.,
    3. Brunak S.
    . 2004. Improved prediction of signal peptides: Signalp 3.0. J. Mol. Biol. 340:783–795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bhowmick D. C.,
    2. Bal B.,
    3. Chatterjee N. S.,
    4. Ghosh A. N.,
    5. Pal S.
    . 2009. A low-GC Gram-positive Thermoanaerobacter-like bacterium isolated from an Indian hot spring contains Cr(VI) reduction activity both in the membrane and cytoplasm. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106:2006–2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bond D. R.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2003. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1548–1555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bond D. R.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2005. Evidence for involvement of an electron shuttle in electricity generation by Geothrix fermentans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2186–2189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brown J. S.,
    2. Holden D. W.
    . 2002. Iron acquisition by Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. Microbes Infect. 4:1149–1156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Butler J. E.,
    2. Nelson D.,
    3. Lovley D. R.
    . 2010. Evolution of electron transfer out of the cell: comparative genomics of six Geobacter genomes. BMC Genomics 11:40–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Byrne-Bailey K. G.,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Complete genome sequence of the electricity producing Thermincola potens strain JR. J. Bacteriol. 15:4078–4079.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chaudhuri S. K.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2003. Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:1229–1232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Childers S. E.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2001. Differences in Fe(III) reduction in the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrobaculum islandicum, versus mesophilic Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 195:253–258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Desvaux M.,
    2. Dumas E.,
    3. Chafsey I.,
    4. Hebraud M.
    . 2006. Protein cell surface display in Gram-positive bacteria: from single protein to macromolecular protein structure. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 256:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dubiel M.,
    2. Hsu C. H.,
    3. Chien C. C.,
    4. Mansfeld F.,
    5. Newman D. K.
    . 2002. Microbial iron respiration can protect steel from corrosion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1440–1445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Eddy S. R.
    1998. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14:755–763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Edgar R.
    2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ehrlich H. L.
    2008. Are gram-positive bacteria capable of electron transfer across their cell wall without an externally available electron shuttle? Geobiology 6:220–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Feinberg L. F.,
    2. Holden J. F.
    . 2006. Characterization of dissimilatory Fe(III) versus NO3− reduction in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum. J. Bacteriol. 188:525–531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Finn R. D.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D281–D288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Finneran K.,
    2. Forbush H.,
    3. Gaw VanPraagh C.,
    4. Lovley D.
    . 2002. Desulfitobacterium metallireducens sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that couples growth to the reduction of metals and humic acids as well as chlorinated compounds. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Franks A. E.,
    2. Nevin K. P.,
    3. Glaven R. H.,
    4. Lovley D. R.
    . 2010. Microtoming coupled to microarray analysis to evaluate the spatial metabolic status of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. ISME J. 4:509–519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Freguia S.,
    2. Masuda M.,
    3. Tsujimura S.,
    4. Kano K.
    . 2009. Lactococcus lactis catalyses electricity generation at microbial fuel cell anodes via excretion of a soluble quinone. Bioelectrochemistry 76:14–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gavrilov S.,
    2. Slobodkin A.,
    3. Robb F.,
    4. de Vries S.
    . 2007. Characterization of membrane-bound Fe (III)-EDTA reductase activities of the thermophilic gram-positive dissimilatory iron-reducing bacterium Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens. Microbiology 76:139–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gorby Y. A.,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:11358–11363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gralnick J. A.,
    2. Newman D. K.
    . 2007. Extracellular respiration. Mol. Microbiol. 65:1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hartshorne R. S.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Characterization of an electron conduit between bacteria and the extracellular environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:22169–22174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Huelsenbeck J. P.,
    2. Ronquist F.
    . 2001. Mrbayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hunter S.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D211–D215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Krogh A.,
    2. Larsson B.,
    3. von Heijne G.,
    4. Sonnhammer E. L. L.
    . 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305:567–580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kunapuli U.,
    2. Lueders T.,
    3. Meckenstock R. U.
    . 2007. The use of stable isotope probing to identify key iron-reducing microorganisms involved in anaerobic benzene degradation. ISME J. 1:643–653.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Leang C.,
    2. Qian X.,
    3. Mester T.,
    4. Lovley D. R.
    . 2010. Alignment of the c-type cytochrome OmcS along pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 12:4080–4084.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lies D. P.,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 uses overlapping pathways for iron reduction at a distance and by direct contact under conditions relevant for biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:4414–4426.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Liu M.,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Bioelectricity generation by a Gram-positive Corynebacterium sp. strain MFC03 under alkaline condition in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technol. 101:1807–1811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lovley D. R.
    2006. Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:497–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lovley D. R.,
    2. Phillips E. J. P.
    . 1988. Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1472–1480.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Marshall C.,
    2. May H.
    . 2009. Electrochemical evidence of direct electrode reduction by a thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium, Thermincola ferriacetica. Energy Environ. Sci. 2:699–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Marsili E.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:3968–3973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mathis B. J.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Electricity generation by thermophilic microorganisms from marine sediment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 78:147–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Matias V. R. F.,
    2. Beveridge T. J.
    . 2005. Cryo-electron microscopy reveals native polymeric cell wall structure in Bacillus subtilis 168 and the existence of a periplasmic space. Mol. Microbiol. 56:240–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Mehta T.,
    2. Coppi M. V.,
    3. Childers S. E.,
    4. Lovley D. R.
    . 2005. Outer membrane c-type cytochromes required for Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxide reduction in Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8634–8641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Methe B.,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens: metal reduction in subsurface environments. Science 302:1967–1969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nevin K. P.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2000. Lack of production of electron-shuttling compounds or solubilization of Fe(III) during reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxide by Geobacter metallireducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2248–2251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Nevin K. P.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2002. Mechanisms for accessing insoluble Fe(III) oxide during dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by Geothrix fermentans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2294–2299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Nevin K. P.,
    2. Lovley D. R.
    . 2002. Mechanisms for Fe(III) oxide reduction in sedimentary environments. Geomicrobiol. J. 19:141–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Nevin K. P.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2505–2514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Park D.,
    2. et al
    . 1997. Electrode reaction of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans modified with organic conductive compounds. Biotechnol. Tech. 11:145–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pham T. H.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Metabolites produced by Pseudomonas sp. enable a Gram-positive bacterium to achieve extracellular electron transfer. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:1119–1129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Rabaey K.,
    2. Boon N.,
    3. Siciliano S. D.,
    4. Verhaege M.,
    5. Verstraete W.
    . 2004. Biofuel cells select for microbial consortia that self-mediate electron transfer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5373–5382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Rabaey K.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Microbial ecology meets electrochemistry: electricity-driven and driving communities. ISME J. 1:9–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Reguera G.,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435:1098–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Reguera G.,
    2. Pollina R. B.,
    3. Nicoll J. S.,
    4. Lovley D. R.
    . 2007. Possible nonconductive role of Geobacter sulfurreducens pilus nanowires in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 189:2125–2127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Ronquist F.,
    2. Huelsenbeck J. P.
    . 2003. Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Schröder I.,
    2. Johnson E.,
    3. de Vries S.
    . 2003. Microbial ferric iron reductases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27:427–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Sharma S.,
    2. Cavallaro G.,
    3. Rosato A.
    . 2010. A systematic investigation of multiheme c-type cytochromes in prokaryotes. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 15:559–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Shi L.,
    2. Squier T. C.,
    3. Zachara J. M.,
    4. Fredrickson J. K.
    . 2007. Respiration of metal (hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a key role for multihaem c-type cytochromes. Mol. Microbiol. 65:12–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Slobodkin A. I.
    2005. Thermophilic microbial metal reduction. Mikrobiologiia 74:581–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Sokolova T. G.,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Thermincola carboxydiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, carboxydotrophic, hydrogenogenic bacterium from a hot spring of the Lake Baikal area. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:2069–2073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Srikanth S.,
    2. Marsili E.,
    3. Flickinger M. C.,
    4. Bond D. R.
    . 2008. Electrochemical characterization of Geobacter sulfurreducens cells immobilized on graphite paper electrodes. Biotechnol. Bioengineer. 99:1065–1073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Von Canstein H.,
    2. Ogawa J.,
    3. Shimizu S.,
    4. Lloyd J.
    . 2008. Secretion of flavins by Shewanella species and their role in extracellular electron transfer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Weber K. A.,
    2. Achenbach L. A.,
    3. Coates J. D.
    . 2006. Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:752–764.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Wrighton K. C.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. A novel ecological role of the Firmicutes identified in thermophilic microbial fuel cells. ISME J. 2:1146–1156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Wrighton K. C.,
    2. Engelbrektson A. E.,
    3. Clark I. C.,
    4. Melnyk R. A.,
    5. Coates J. D.
    . 2011. Accentuate the positive: dissimilatory iron reduction by gram-positive bacteria. In Stolz J., Oremland R. (ed.), Microbial metal and metalloid metabolism: advances and applications. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Xing D.,
    2. Zuo Y.,
    3. Cheng S.,
    4. Regan J.,
    5. Logan B.
    . 2008. Electricity generation by Rhodopseudomonas palustris DX-1. 42:4146-4151.
  62. 62.↵
    1. Zavarzina D. G.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Thermincola ferriacetica sp. nov., a new anaerobic, thermophilic, facultatively chemolithoautotrophic bacterium capable of dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction. Extremophiles 11:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evidence for Direct Electron Transfer by a Gram-Positive Bacterium Isolated from a Microbial Fuel Cell
K. C. Wrighton, J. C. Thrash, R. A. Melnyk, J. P. Bigi, K. G. Byrne-Bailey, J. P. Remis, D. Schichnes, M. Auer, C. J. Chang, J. D. Coates
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2011, 77 (21) 7633-7639; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05365-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence for Direct Electron Transfer by a Gram-Positive Bacterium Isolated from a Microbial Fuel Cell
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evidence for Direct Electron Transfer by a Gram-Positive Bacterium Isolated from a Microbial Fuel Cell
K. C. Wrighton, J. C. Thrash, R. A. Melnyk, J. P. Bigi, K. G. Byrne-Bailey, J. P. Remis, D. Schichnes, M. Auer, C. J. Chang, J. D. Coates
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2011, 77 (21) 7633-7639; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05365-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336