Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Hemolytic Porcine Intestinal Escherichia coli without Virulence-Associated Genes Typical of Intestinal Pathogenic E. coli

Peter Schierack, Joerg Weinreich, Christa Ewers, Babila Tachu, Bryon Nicholson, Stefanie Barth
Peter Schierack
1Fachbereich Bio-, Chemie- und Verfahrenstechnik, Hochschule Lausitz, Senftenberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: peter.schierack@hs-lausitz.de
Joerg Weinreich
1Fachbereich Bio-, Chemie- und Verfahrenstechnik, Hochschule Lausitz, Senftenberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christa Ewers
2Institut f�r Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen, Fachbereich Veterin�rmedizin, Freie Universit�t Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Babila Tachu
3Abteilung Neuroproteomics, Max-Delbr�ck-Centrum f�r Molekulare Medizin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryon Nicholson
4Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie Barth
5Institut f�r Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten der Tiere, Justus-Liebig-Universit�t Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05289-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Testing 1,666 fecal or intestinal samples from healthy and diarrheic pigs, we obtained hemolytic Escherichia coli isolates from 593 samples. Focusing on hemolytic E. coli isolates without virulence-associated genes (VAGs) typical for enteropathogens, we found that such isolates carried a broad variety of VAGs typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli.

TEXT

Hemolytic Escherichia coli strains are common in the intestine of clinically healthy and diseased pigs (2, 9–12) and often do not possess virulence-associated genes typical of intestinal pathogenic isolates (iVAGs) like est-1a, est-2, eltB-Ip, and faeG, which are frequently observed among enterotoxigenic E. coli, or stx2e and fedA, which are characteristic of edema disease-causing E. coli (9, 10). As such isolates were not the main focus of recent clinical diagnosis, knowledge of their virulence gene profile is poorly defined. Based on our initial observations (10), we assumed that such E. coli strains harbor high numbers of VAGs typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC; eVAGs), which cause urinary tract infections, septicemia, and meningitis in both humans and animals (5). The present study assessed the frequency of hemolytic E. coli isolates lacking iVAGs in swine and provides a first insight into virulence gene features as an initial step toward understanding this E. coli group.

As depicted in Fig. 1, E. coli cells were obtained from feces or intestinal contents of clinically healthy and diarrheic pigs. Alpha-hemolysis of E. coli was tested as previously described (8). Hemolytic E. coli isolates from clinically healthy pigs were obtained from 132 pigs on 24 farms between 2002 and 2009 (for details, see Table S1 in the supplemental material). During a longitudinal study, hemolytic E. coli isolates from healthy pigs were studied over 19 months at another farm. Here, 127 randomly chosen samples from 73 pigs were collected. Samples of intestinal E. coli isolates from diseased pigs with enteritis or edema disease were obtained between 2007 and 2009 during routine laboratory diagnosis (Institut f�r Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten der Tiere, Justus-Liebig-Universit�t, Giessen, Germany). The pigs (n = 1,407) were from 530 farms with unknown production status.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Flowchart of sampling and characterization of E. coli isolates in this study. Clinically healthy pigs were from production units in Berlin, Brandenburg, Lower Saxony, Saxony, Thuringia, and Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Diseased pigs were from production units in North Rhine-Westphalia, Hesse, Schleswig-Holstein, Bavaria, Lower Saxony, and Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, and Styria and Lower Austria, Austria. Asterisks indicate that the remaining 59 (out of 121) hemolytic E. coli isolates were not available as cultures and therefore could not be included in further analysis.

Hemolytic isolates were tested for the presence of iVAGs, including faeG, fanA, fasA, fedA, and fimF41a (coding for subunits of F4, F5, F6, F18, and F41 fimbriae, respectively) and stx2e, est-1a, est-2, eltB-Ip (coding for toxins) by PCR as previously described (1, 6). All isolates carrying at least one of these iVAGs were excluded from further investigations. In cases in which more than one hemolytic E. coli isolate was isolated from a single farm, duplicate isolates, as determined by macrorestriction analysis (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE]) (8), were excluded from further analyses (Fig. 1). Nonduplicate hemolytic E. coli isolates without iVAGs were then tested for eVAGs (Table 1) and classified into phylogenetic groups according to the EcoR system by PCRs previously described (3, 5, 10). Statistical analyses for comparison of the occurrence of genes between isolates from animal groups were performed using two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Analysis of the occurrence of eVAGs according to an EcoR group used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni post hoc test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Occurrence of eVAGs in porcine intestinal hemolytic E. coli and comparison to data from an already published study on porcine intestinal nonhemolytic E. colia,b

Hemolytic E. coli isolates were isolated from 62 clinically healthy pigs (47.0% of all samples). These 62 isolates (1 isolate per pig) belonged to 37 PFGE types, of which 32 did not carry iVAGs. In the longitudinal study, hemolytic E. coli isolates were isolated from 47 randomly chosen intestinal samples (37% of all samples). These 47 hemolytic isolates (1 isolate per sample) were divided into eight PFGE types, 5 of which did not carry iVAGs. One PFGE type with a unique and stable PFGE pattern and without iVAGs was detected over the 19-month sampling period in 20 different animals. Hemolytic E. coli isolates were isolated from 484 samples from diseased pigs (34.4% of all samples). A total of 121 isolates did not carry iVAGs. A total of 62 randomly chosen isolates—each from a different farm—were included in further analysis (Fig. 1).

The 37 isolates with a unique PFGE type from clinically healthy pigs, including the five isolates from the longitudinal study and 62 isolates from diseased pigs, were tested for eVAGs (Table 1; Fig. 2). All isolates carried the gene ompA. Two genes that were absent from all isolates were iha and sat. Only tsh and traT were found significantly more often in isolates from diseased piglets (P < 0.05). Genes hra, chuA, fyuA, iroN, irp2, astA, and ibeA were present significantly more often in isolates from healthy piglets (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Presence or absences of eVAGs in 99 porcine intestinal hemolytic E. coli isolates in this study. n, number of isolates per pattern. Solid squares indicate the presence of the respective gene, and open squares indicate its absence.

Hemolytic isolates belonged to EcoR groups A (59 isolates), B1 (14 isolates), B2 (18 isolates), and D (8 isolates). Isolates belonging to EcoR group B2 carried significantly more eVAGs (median, 18; minimum, 15; maximum, 22) than group D (median, 11; minimum, 7; maximum, 16), B1 (median, 9.5; minimum, 6; maximum, 18), and A (median, 7; minimum, 5; maximum, 15) members (P < 0.001) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Genes sit (chromosomal), neuC, ibeA, gimB, and tia were exclusively found in EcoR group B2 isolates. Almost all EcoR group B2 members carried genes hra, papC, fyuA, malX, iroN, kpsMTII, sfa/focCD, irp2, sit (chromosomal), traT, astA, vat, hlyA, and cnf1/2 (Table S2).

As hypothesized, a considerable proportion of porcine intestinal hemolytic E. coli isolates lacking iVAGs carried a broad variety of eVAGs. We identified a number of eVAGs that have not been reported for porcine E. coli isolates so far. Among these were genes coding for adhesins (hra, tsh, and mat), iron acquisition (ireA), protectins (neuC), and an invasion-related factor (gimB). Genes iha and sat, which are common in extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) isolates were not detected, and only iha was previously reported to be present in intestinal E. coli from pigs (2, 13). In conclusion, almost all eVAGs can also be found in porcine intestinal E. coli.

A comparison between porcine intestinal hemolytic isolates without iVAGs of the present study with previously published intestinal porcine nonhemolytic isolates (10) showed that a broad variety of eVAGs were present in both groups (Table 1), but hemolytic isolates carried higher numbers of such VAGs. In line with other studies, E. coli isolates affiliated with EcoR group B2 carried more eVAGs, in particular iron acquisition genes, than EcoR A, B1, or D isolates (5, 7).

In general, we detected more hemolytic isolates without iVAGs (82.2%) than with iVAGs (17.8%) in clinically healthy pigs. In contrast, a lower number of hemolytic isolates without iVAGs (25.0%) than with iVAGs (75.0%) were isolated from diarrheic pigs. Further studies should prove the role of hemolytic isolates without iVAGs in healthy and diseased pigs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants InnoProfile 03 IP 611 and FUGATO “E. coli chick,” both funded by the Bundesministerium f�r Bildung und Forschung (Germany).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 27 April 2011.
    • Accepted 24 September 2011.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 30 September 2011.
  • ↵† Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05289-11.

  • Copyright � 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barth S.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Virulence and fitness gene patterns of Shiga toxin-encoding Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with edema disease or diarrhea in Germany. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr.120: 307–316.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chapman T. A.,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Comparison of virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli isolates isolated from healthy and diarrheic swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72: 4782–4795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Clermont O.,
    2. Bonacorsi S.,
    3. Bingen E.
    . 2000. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66: 4555–4558.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Ewers C.,
    2. Antao E. M.,
    3. Diehl I.,
    4. Philipp H. C.,
    5. Wieler L. H.
    . 2009. Intestine and environment of the chicken as reservoirs for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates with zoonotic potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.75: 184–192.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ewers C.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Avian pathogenic, uropathogenic, and newborn meningitis-causing Escherichia coli: how closely related are they?Int. J. Med. Microbiol.297: 163–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Moon H. W.,
    2. Hoffman L. J.,
    3. Cornick N. A.,
    4. Booher S. L.,
    5. Bosworth B. T.
    . 1999. Prevalences of some virulence genes among Escherichia coli isolates from swine presented to a diagnostic laboratory in Iowa. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.11: 557–560.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Moulin-Schouleur M.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates of avian and human origin: link between phylogenetic relationships and common virulence patterns. J. Clin. Microbiol.45: 3366–3376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schierack P.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Isolation and characterization of intestinal Escherichia coli clones from wild boars in Germany. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.75: 695–702.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schierack P.,
    2. Steinruck H.,
    3. Kleta S.,
    4. Vahjen W.
    . 2006. Virulence factor gene profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from clinically healthy pigs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72: 6680–6686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schierack P.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. ExPEC-typical virulence-associated genes correlate with successful colonization by intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group. Environ. Microbiol.10: 1742–1751.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schierack P.,
    2. Walk N.,
    3. Reiter K.,
    4. Weyrauch K. D.,
    5. Wieler L. H.
    . 2007. Composition of intestinal Enterobacteriaceae populations of healthy domestic pigs. Microbiology153: 3830–3837.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Smith H. W
    . 1963. The haemolysins of Escherichia coli. J. Pathol. Bacteriol.85: 197–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Smith M. G.,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles in multi-drug resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea. Vet. Microbiol.145: 299–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Hemolytic Porcine Intestinal Escherichia coli without Virulence-Associated Genes Typical of Intestinal Pathogenic E. coli
Peter Schierack, Joerg Weinreich, Christa Ewers, Babila Tachu, Bryon Nicholson, Stefanie Barth
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2011, 77 (23) 8451-8455; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05289-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hemolytic Porcine Intestinal Escherichia coli without Virulence-Associated Genes Typical of Intestinal Pathogenic E. coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Hemolytic Porcine Intestinal Escherichia coli without Virulence-Associated Genes Typical of Intestinal Pathogenic E. coli
Peter Schierack, Joerg Weinreich, Christa Ewers, Babila Tachu, Bryon Nicholson, Stefanie Barth
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 2011, 77 (23) 8451-8455; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05289-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336