Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Physiology

The Cell Membrane as a Major Site of Damage during Aerosolization of Escherichia coli

Richard J. Thomas, Daniel Webber, Rebecca Hopkins, Andrew Frost, Thomas Laws, Pramukh N. Jayasekera, Timothy Atkins
Richard J. Thomas
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rjthomas@dstl.gov.uk
Daniel Webber
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Hopkins
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Frost
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Laws
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pramukh N. Jayasekera
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Atkins
Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01116-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to provide data on the survival and site of damage of Escherichia coli cells following aerosolization using two different techniques, nebulization and flow focusing. Four metabolic stains were assessed for their ability to detect respiratory activities and membrane homeostasis in aerosolized E. coli cells. The degree of sublethal injury increased significantly over the 10-min period of aerosolization in E. coli cells aerosolized by using the Collison nebulizer, reaching up to 99.9% of the population. In contrast, a significantly lower proportion of the population was sublethally damaged during aerosolization using the flow-focusing aerosol generator (FFAG). Concomitantly, loss of membrane homeostasis increased at a higher rate in nebulized cells (68 to 71%) than in those aerosolized by using the FFAG (32 to 34%). The activities of respiratory enzymes decreased at increased rates in nebulized cells (27 to 37%) compared to the rates of decrease in cells aerosolized by using the FFAG (59 to 61%). The results indicate that the physiology of an aerosolized bacterium is linked to the method of aerosol generation and may affect the interpretation of a range of aerobiological phenomenon.

Aerosolization of bacteria has importance from medical, agricultural, and biodefense perspectives. Bacterial infections of the respiratory tract are transmitted by aerosols produced by coughing and sneezing (26, 35, 36, 37). Insecticidal bacteria, such as Bacillus thuringiensis, may be disseminated by aerosols to control agricultural pests (3). Dissemination of biowarfare agents can occur by the production of an aerosol, and an understanding of survival is important for hazard management (32). In all these examples, for the aerosolized bacteria to exert an effect, they must remain viable in the aerosolized state for a period of time.

The physiological status of bacteria changes with time spent in the aerosolized state. Loss of culturability on plating media is often biphasic, being defined by an initial rapid decline over the first few minutes followed by further decline at a lower rate (13, 39, 41, 48). The initial process of aerosolization, for example, nebulization, will impart device-dependent mechanical stress, such as physical shear and wall impaction, resulting from operation of the pressurized system (33, 34, 38). After aerosolization, a number of parameters will contribute to loss of viability in the airborne bacteria, including temperature, particle size, desiccation (relative humidity), UV radiation, oxidative shock, and toxic pollutants (carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, ozone, and “open air factor”) (9, 10, 13, 16, 20, 36, 42, 43, 46, 48). Furthermore, bacteriological factors, such as growth phase or sporulation state, will influence survival (8, 9). Bacteria have been proposed to enter the viable-but-nonculturable (VBNC) state as a result of both aerosolization and impingement. VBNC cells represent a physiological state where bacteria cannot be cultured on nonselective agar yet retain certain vital processes indicative of life, such as active respiratory enzymes or maintenance of membrane integrity (12, 31). These phenomena have importance in both experimental animal inhalational studies and natural respiratory transmission events, because the physiological status of the aerosolized bacteria will directly influence the potential to cause infection. A further consideration is the stress imparted by the bioaerosol sampling process that will influence bacterial injury and recovery; for example, high-velocity impingement into various collection fluids or impaction onto agar surfaces (38, 47).

Previously, a comparative study demonstrated greater survival of bacteria aerosolized by the flow-focusing aerosol generator (FFAG); however, the site of action was not determined (40). The Collison nebulizer is commonly used in aerobiology to generate small-particle bioaerosols for animal exposures. An understanding of the effect of nebulization on the bacterial cell is essential. The objective of this study was to determine the survival and site of damage of Escherichia coli cells during the initial mechanistic generation of the aerosol by nebulization or flow focusing. A variety of culture-based techniques and vitality stains were used to probe the temporal physiological status of aerosolized Escherichia coli MRE162 cells as a function of the spray device (Collison nebulizer or FFAG) and particle size (1 to 3 μm and 12 μm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture.E. coli MRE162 was obtained from the in-house culture collection at the Defense Science & Technology Laboratories (Dstl, Porton Down) and routinely cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates at 37°C for 24 h for the isolation of single colonies. Assessment of viability was made on LB agar plates containing final concentrations of 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium deoxycholate, 4% (wt/vol) sodium chloride, or 10 μg ml−1 polymyxin B sulfate or reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers (500 units ml−1 catalase, 10 units ml−1 superoxide dismutase [SOD], and 50 mM sodium pyruvate). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Ltd. (United Kingdom). For aerosol exposures, LB broth cultures were shaken at 120 revolutions min−1 for 24 h at 37°C, producing a concentration of 1.0 × 109 ± 0.36 × 109 (mean ± standard error) CFU ml−1 in stationary phase. Stock cultures were maintained at −80°C in LB broth containing 10% (vol/vol) glycerol.

Aerosol generation and sampling.Five experiments were performed with samples collected in triplicate for analysis. Aerosols were generated within a sealed Perspex aerosolization chamber with dimensions of 900 mm (length) by 545 mm (height) by 500 mm (depth) and collected on fresh Whatman glass microfiber filters, grade GF/A, 47 mm in diameter (Sigma-Aldrich Ltd., United Kingdom), held in stainless steel filter holders, by drawing compressed air through at a flow rate of 66 liters min−1. The relative humidity and temperature were 49.0% ± 2.1% and 19.3% ± 0.4°C, respectively. E. coli cells were aerosolized at a concentration of 109 ml−1 from either a 3-jet Collison nebulizer or an FFAG (75-μm-diameter orifice; Ingeniatrics Technologías, Seville, Spain) as previously described (40). The 3-jet Collison nebulizer was operated at a pressure of 26 lb/in2 (179,000 Pa). The FFAG was operated at a pressure of 16 lb/in2 (110,000 Pa) derived from a filtered compressed air supply, and the liquid supplied via a syringe pump (pump 11 plus advanced; Harvard Apparatus, United Kingdom) at a flow rate of 50 μl min−1. The particle size distribution was determined by the helium-neon-laser-optical-system (HELOS/BFS; Sympatec-GmbH Ltd., Germany) utilizing laser diffraction within a parallel laser beam (632.8 nm) over a range of 0.1 to 875 μm. The WINDOX 5 sensor control program recorded and analyzed the particle size distribution over a 30-s period at a rate of 2,000 distributions per s (Sympatec-GmbH Ltd., Germany). The Collison nebulizer and the FFAG produced aerosol particle distributions with mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) of 1 to 3 μm and 12 μm, respectively (40).

Determination of the effect of aerosolization on bacterial viability.E. coli MRE162 was cultured to a density of 1.6 × 109 ± 0.04 × 109 CFU ml−1 in nutrient broth and split into equal 10-ml volumes for aerosolization using the Collison nebulizer or the FFAG for 1, 5, and 10 min. The aerosolized bacteria were collected onto filters as described above. Immediately after collection, the filters were placed into 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and vigorously shaken for 30 s to remove the deposited bacteria. An extraction efficiency of >98% using Bacillus atrophaeus endospores was demonstrated. The PBS was immediately subjected to downstream processing via spread plating onto nonsupplemented LB agar and supplemented LB agars and by incubation with a range of viability stains. Determination of the numbers of culturable cells was by serial dilution and spread plating of 100-μl aliquots in triplicate onto LB agar or LB agar supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol/) sodium deoxycholate, 4% (wt/vol) sodium chloride, 10 μg ml−1 polymyxin, or ROS scavengers (500 units ml−1 catalase, 10 units ml−1 superoxide dismutase, and 50 mM sodium pyruvate). The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The percentage of injury was determined by dividing the viable count obtained on the supplemented LB agar by that obtained on nonsupplemented LB agar prior to multiplication by 100%.

Vitality staining protocols.The samples were also subjected to a range of staining protocols to determine the physiological status of the bacteria. As controls, bacteria were either unstressed cultures held at 37°C or cells heated at 70°C for 1 h. The following kits were used for staining. (i) The Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability and counting kit. Bacteria that have intact membranes stain green (SYTO-9), while those with compromised membranes stain red (propidium iodide [PI]). (ii) The BacLight bacterial membrane potential kit. Bacteria that possess a membrane potential stain bright green, while those with a depolarized membrane potential have reduced staining, appearing as dull green. Additional control bacteria were treated with 10 μM carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) to depolarize the membrane potential. (iii) The BacLight RedoxSensor green viability kit. Bacteria with active oxidoreductases reduce the stain, producing a bright green coloration, while those with inactivated enzymes have reduced intensity, appearing dull green. Additional control bacteria were treated with 10 μM CCCP or 10 mM sodium azide. (iv) The BacLight RedoxSensor CTC viability kit. Bacteria with active respiratory dehydrogenases reduce 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) to an insoluble red fluorescent formazan. Nonrespiring bacteria are not stained. Bacteria are counterstained with the membrane-permeable nucleic acid stain SYTO-24. All of the kits were purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. The assays were performed immediately after collection of the sample according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediately after staining, 4% (vol/vol) formalin was added to prevent the occurrence of further cellular processes. Gelatin-coated microscope slides were prepared according to a previously described methodology (40). A 50-μl drop of the stained bacteria was allowed to dry into the gelatin prior to the addition of coverslips and microscopic analysis.

Microscopic analysis.Slides were analyzed with an Olympus IX70 inverted laser confocal microscope (Olympus, Germany) using a ×60 water immersion lens. The fluorescent samples were excited at 488 nm and detected by using either a 530-nm band-pass filter (green fluorescent dyes) or a 565-nm long-pass filter (red fluorescent dyes). Images were recorded and processed using the FluoView imaging system (Olympus, Germany). On each slide, at least 200 cells were counted from 20 fields of view and scored according to the staining protocol used. The percentage of cells possessing a vital function was calculated by dividing the number of stained cells by the total number of cells counted and multiplying by 100.

Flow cytometric analysis.For each aerosolization experiment, five samples per time point (0, 1, 5, and 10 min) were stained with the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability and counting kit before flow cytometric analysis on a BD FACSCanto II system (BD Biosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom). A blue solid-state laser operating at 50 mW excited the dyes at 488 nm. Optical filters were set up so that propidium iodide (red fluorescence) was measured at 620 nm and SYTO-9 (green fluorescence) was measured at 585 nm. The data were analyzed using FACSDiva analysis software (Becton, Dickinson, United Kingdom).

Characterization of bacterial injury within particles.E. coli cells prepared in PBS at a concentration of 109 ml−1 were stained with the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability and counting kit. The E. coli suspensions were aerosolized and collected into a seven-stage “ultimate” cascade impactor (23). Individual particles were collected on gelatin-coated microscope slides according to a previously described methodology (40). The slides were analyzed as described above. On each slide, at least 200 particles were counted from 20 fields of view. The number of particulates contained within each particle was recorded. The diameter of the original particles prior to impaction into the gelatin was derived in μm from the scale provided by the imaging software. The actual size of the original particle was obtained by multiplication of the diameter of the impacted particle by a conversion factor of 0.59 (21).

Statistical analysis.All data are expressed as the standard error around the mean from either three or five replicate experiments. The two-sample paired t test was used for comparison between groups using the MiniTab release 14, version 02, statistical package.

RESULTS

Evaluation of culture media and viability stains.A range of techniques were used to distinguish between the two populations of E. coli cells that physiologically would be defined as live and dead (Table 1). A 16-h culture at 2.3 × 109 ± 0.22 × 109 CFU ml−1 was split into two equal volumes; one was held at 37°C, while the other was heated at 70°C for 60 min. After 60 min of incubation, the culturable counts on LB medium were 2.42 × 109 ± 0.14 × 109 CFU ml−1 and 0 ± 0 for the populations incubated at 37 and 70°C, respectively. The Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability stain and the BacLight bacterial membrane potential stain differentiated clearly between cells heated at 37 and 70°C, indicating that one of the sites of damage was the cell membrane. The microscopic counts and flow cytometric counts for bacteria treated with the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability stain were not significantly different whether the cells were incubated at 37 or 70°C (P = 0.69). Heating at 70°C for 60 min reduced the percentage of stained bacteria, indicating loss of oxidoreductase and dehydrogenase activities.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Effect of heating at 70°C for 60 min on the physiological staining of Escherichia coli MRE162 cells

A variety of supplemented media prepared from an LB agar base were examined for their ability to detect classical bacterial injury upon temperature shift from 37 to 50°C for 60 min (Table 2). Compared to control cells incubated at 37°C, significant injury was observed in cells cultured on LB medium containing polymyxin (P = 0.006), sodium deoxycholate (P = 0.002), or sodium chloride (P = 0.002) after heating at 50°C. Protection from sublethal heat injury was afforded by the inclusion of ROS scavengers in the LB medium, where no significant difference in injury was observed between cells incubated at 37 and 50°C (P = 0.72).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Effect of heating at 50°C for 60 min on classical injury of Escherichia coli MRE162 cells

Nebulization exerts a greater stress than flow focusing on E. coli cells during initial aerosol generation.The stress associated with aerosol generation of a bioaerosol can be divided into two parts. First, some bacteria may go through the process of aerosol generation but not actually be released as airborne bacteria, instead falling back into the liquid reservoir. Second, those released as airborne bacteria will experience a second set of stresses associated with release through the nozzle and the subsequent atmospheric conditions. Prior to aerosol release, the culturable count in the reservoirs (10 ml) of both the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer was 1.24 × 109 ± 0.03 × 109 CFU ml−1 on unsupplemented LB agar. No significant difference was observed on any of the supplemented media (P = 0.82). After 10 min of aerosolization, the reservoirs of the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer yielded counts of 9.48 × 108 ± 0.06 × 108 and 4.22 × 108 ± 0.03 × 108 CFU ml−1, respectively, on unsupplemented LB agar. After 10 min of nebulization using the Collison nebulizer, sublethal injury in the population in the reservoir was observed at levels of 13.3% ± 2.6%, 24.0% ± 5.3%, and 26.8% ± 4.1% on selective medium containing polymyxin, sodium deoxycholate, or NaCl, respectively. No significant differences were observed on any of the supplemented media using the FFAG (P = 0.57).

Prior to aerosol generation, 0.47% ± 0.21% of the E. coli MRE162 cells were PI-stained with the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability kit. After 10 min of aerosolization, the percentages of PI-stained cells in the reservoirs of the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer increased to 7.53% ± 0.76% and 32.07% ± 1.65%, respectively; these differences between aerosol generators were significant (P = 0.009).

Classical injury increases during extended aerosolization.Airborne particles containing the bacteria were collected onto filters and kept in an air stream for various periods of time prior to being assayed for viability using the above-described techniques. Bacteria aerosolized by either the Collison nebulizer or the FFAG experienced sublethal injury within the first minute of aerosolization, ranging from 96.5 to 98.2% depending on the selective component employed in the medium (Fig. 1). There was no significant difference between the degree of injury experienced during the first minute when the cells were aerosolized using either the Collison nebulizer or the FFAG for medium supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium deoxycholate (P = 0.63) or 10 μg ml−1 polymyxin (P = 0.14). In contrast, a significant difference between the degree of sublethal injury experienced during aerosolization by the two spray devices was observed when using medium containing 4% (wt/vol) NaCl (P = 0.011). Increased exposure to the stresses of aerosolization (10 min) experienced when using the Collison nebulizer significantly increased the quantity of sublethally injured cells, from 98.9 to 99.9%, for medium containing deoxycholate, NaCl, or polymyxin (P < 0.03). In contrast, 10 min of exposure to the aerosolization stress imposed by the FFAG did not significantly increase sublethal injury compared to that observed after 1 min of exposure for medium containing deoxycholate, NaCl, or polymyxin (P > 0.5). Irrespective of the length of time of aerosolization and method of aerosol generation, no significant difference was observed for counts observed on medium containing ROS scavengers (P > 0.83).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Sublethal injury in Escherichia coli MRE162 populations aerosolized using the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer, determined on LB medium supplemented as indicated.

Cell membrane damage occurs during aerosolization.The temporal effect of aerosolization was examined as a function of the inactivation or maintenance of cellular physiology, such as membrane homeostasis and respiratory activity (Fig. 2). An increase in the percentage of PI-stained cells was observed over the first minute of aerosolization for both the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer, to levels of 39.33% ± 4.01% and 58.87% ± 2.7%, respectively (Fig. 2a). Over the next 10 min, the percentage of PI-stained cells remained constant at 31.63% ± 3.32% for cells aerosolized using the FFAG but increased to 70.87% ± 6.81% for cells aerosolized by the Collison nebulizer. At all time points, the differences between the percentages of PI-stained cells generated by aerosolization via the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer were significant (P < 0.003). Loss of membrane integrity of aerosolized E. coli cells was visualized within the individual 12-μm and 1- to 2-μm particles generated by the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer (data not shown). The degrees of loss of membrane integrity after 5 s of aerosol capture onto gelatin-coated slides within a cascade impactor were 11.33% ± 1.94% and 32.61% ± 4.35% for the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer, respectively.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Temporal effects on the maintenance of physiological activities of airborne Escherichia coli MRE162 when using the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer for aerosolization. (a) Membrane homeostasis. PI-stained cells indicating loss of membrane integrity by aerosolization using the FFAG (○) or the Collison nebulizer (•) and cells possessing depolarized membranes resulting from aerosolization using the FFAG (□) or the Collison nebulizer (▪) were determined at 0 min and after 1, 5, and 10 min of nebulization. (b) Respiratory enzymatic activities. Loss of respiratory oxidoreductase activity by aerosolization using the FFAG (○) or the Collison nebulizer (•) and loss of respiratory dehydrogenase activity from aerosolization using the FFAG (□) or the Collison nebulizer (▪) were determined at 0 min and after 1, 5, and 10 min of nebulization.

Aerosolization by either the FFAG or the Collison nebulizer produced increased numbers of cells with depolarized membranes (Fig. 2a). Cells aerosolized by the Collison nebulizer exhibited depolarized membranes at a higher rate than cells aerosolized by the FFAG, reaching levels of 68.13% ± 5.24% and 34.23% ± 6.72%, respectively, after 10 min of aerosolization. At each time point, the difference between the percentages of cells with depolarized membranes after aerosolization by the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer was significant (P < 0.0065).

Bacterial respiratory oxidoreductase and dehydrogenase activities decreased over the 10-min period of aerosolization for both the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer (Fig. 2b). There was no significant difference between oxidoreductase or dehydrogenase enzyme activity for either spray device after 1 min of aerosolization (P = 0.73). Thereafter, the rates of loss of oxidoreductase and dehydrogenase activities decreased more sharply, reaching respective levels of 36.97% ± 6.91% and 28.69% ± 7.13% after 10 min of aerosolization for the Collison nebulizer. In contrast, the rates of decline of respiratory enzyme activities in cells aerosolized using the FFAG were lower, reaching levels of 59.23% ± 6.9% and 61.38% ± 7.91% after 10 min. After 10 min of aerosolization, significant differences were observed between the populations of cells aerosolized by the FFAG and the Collison nebulizer with respect to the activities of oxidoreductase (P = 0.0062) and dehydrogenase (P = 0.009) respiratory enzymes.

DISCUSSION

Flow focusing appears to be a gentler method of generating aerosols than nebulization when the mechanics are compared. This was confirmed by the increased level of sublethal injury and loss of membrane integrity observed in the reservoir of the Collison nebulizer compared to the results for the reservoir of the FFAG. This is probably due to the fact that nebulization involves repeated cycles of reservoir fluid containing the bacteria being drawn under pressure into the nebulizing head before being sprayed against the glass housing of the reservoir to generate the aerosol. This process will exert shear stress on the bacteria, and much of the aerosolized material will fall back into the reservoir (22). In contrast, flow focusing relies on the generation of the aerosol particles external to the device by passing an airflow, at a lower pressure (110,000 Pa) than that used in the Collison nebulizer (179,000 Pa), past a microjet containing the bacterial suspension (6, 7).

Nonselective LB medium supported culture of the aerosolized cells throughout the 10-min process of aerosolization and collection. Therefore, in contrast to the results of the studies of Heidelberg et al. (12) and Rule et al. (31), the formation of nonculturable cells displaying signs of activity or vitality that warrant distinction physiologically as viable but nonculturable were not observed during the conditions employed in this study. This may simply be due to the fact that the period of aerosolization was comparatively small, and therefore, the bacteria were not stressed severely enough. Future studies will investigate this phenomenon within aged bacterial aerosols extending over a period of hours. The recovery of cells that were previously nonculturable on nonselective solid media has been demonstrated by the addition to the medium of scavengers of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including catalase, superoxide dismutase, ferrioxamine E, sodium pyruvate, glutathione, and α-ketoglutarate. Such recovery has been observed for Aeromonas hydrophila, E. coli, Enterococcus spp., Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Vibrio spp. stressed under a variety of conditions (1, 2, 4, 15, 18, 24, 28, 44, 45). Indeed, in this study, the addition of ROS scavengers permitted the recovery of E. coli cells sublethally stressed for 60 min at 50°C. The inability of LB agar unsupplemented with ROS scavengers to culture stressed cells is possibly due to the generation of ROS, such as hydroxyl radicals, during metabolism (15, 45). However, the addition of ROS scavengers to the medium did not protect against the degree of sublethal injury experienced by aerosolized cells irrespective of the length of time the cells were aerosolized or the nature of the spray device used, perhaps indicating that oxidative damage by ROS was not the major cause of damage in the aerosolized cells.

The membrane was a major site of damage during the conditions of aerosolization employed in this study; this was demonstrated by an increased percentage of PI-stained cells observed when using the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability stain. Membrane damage occurred at a greater rate in cells aerosolized using the Collison nebulizer than in cells aerosolized by the FFAG (Fig. 2). This was exemplified by the fact that after an aerosolization period of only 5 s, 32.6% of the E. coli population aerosolized by the Collison nebulizer had impaired membrane integrity, compared to 11.3% for the FFAG. Maintenance of membrane homeostasis and integrity is important for bacterial survival under adverse conditions in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (14, 25, 29). Indeed, cytoplasmic and outer membrane damage prompt a number of stress response mechanisms present in E. coli, including RpoE, CpxAR, BaeRS, phage shock response, and the Rcs phosphorelay (11, 19, 27, 29, 30). It is currently unknown whether these pathways are upregulated in response to the membrane damage associated with aerosolization.

Previous studies have demonstrated that bacterial survival under the deleterious stresses associated with aerosolization, including temperature, relative humidity, and simulated solar radiation, increased as the particle size increased from 1 to 7 μm (17, 42). In this study, it is difficult to dissociate particle-size-dependent effects from the effects of the mechanical stresses employed during aerosolization from the liquid suspension. Certainly, it is apparent that the overall process of flow focusing and subsequent aerosolization within 12-μm particles inflicts less membrane damage on the E. coli cells than is encountered by the 1- to 3-μm particles generated by nebulization.

This study represents the first step in investigating the physiology of bacteria stressed during aerosolization using two different spray devices. Compared to the results for the FFAG, aerosolization using the Collison nebulizer damaged the E. coli cells to a significantly greater extent. This study identified the cell membrane and respiratory chain as two sites of damage. Damage to other cellular machinery may be expected and warrants further research. For example, as occurs with other stresses, damage to the replication and protein synthesis macromolecules may occur, manifested by DNA/RNA strand breaks or aberrant protein folding (5, 49). Future studies will investigate the effect of aerosolization stress extended beyond 10 min and attempt to dissociate the effect of spray device from that of particle size. The data indicate that the physiology of the aerosolized bacterium is inextricably linked to the technique of aerosolization, and this may affect the downstream interpretation of results in research fields that investigate natural aerobiological phenomena, such as respiratory disease transmission in animal models. Future research will investigate physiological changes resulting from aerosolization in known respiratory pathogens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We recognize the contribution of Ministry of Defense funding for this research.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 8 May 2010.
    • Accepted 27 November 2010.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 10 December 2010.
  • Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abe, A., et al. 2007. Isolation and characterization of a cold-induced nonculturable suppression mutant of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol. Res. 162:130-138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Asakura, H., et al. 2002. Passage in mice causes a change in the ability of Salmonella enterica serovar Oranienburg to survive NaCl osmotic stress: resuscitation from the viable but non-culturable state. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 212:87-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Bauce, E., N. Carisey, A. Dupont, and K. van Frankenhuyzen. 2004. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki aerial spray prescriptions for balsam fir stand protection against spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97:1624-1634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Bogosian, G., et al. 2000. Recovery of hydrogen peroxide-sensitive culturable cells of Vibrio vulnificus gives the appearance of resuscitation from a viable but nonculturable state. J. Bacteriol. 182:5070-5075.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Cadet, J., et al. 2002. Recent aspects of oxidative DNA damage: guanine lesions, measurement and substrate specificity of DNA repair glycosylases. Biol. Chem. 383:933-943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Gaňan-Calvo, A. M. 1998. Generation of steady liquid microthreads and micron-sized monodisperse sprays in gas streams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:285-288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Gaňan-Calvo, A. M., and A. Barrero. 1999. A novel pneumatic technique to generate steady capillary microjets. J. Aerosol Sci. 30:117-125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Griffiths, W. D., I. W. Stewart, A. R. Reading, and S. J. Futter. 1996. Effect of aerosolisation, growth phase and residence time in spray and collection fluids on the culturability of cells and spores. J. Aerosol. Sci. 27:803-820.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Handley, B. A., and A. J. F. Webster. 1995. Some factors affecting the airborne survival of bacteria outdoors. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 79:368-378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Hatch, M. T., and R. L. Dimmick. 1966. Physiological responses of airborne bacteria to shifts in relative humidity. Bacteriol. Rev. 30:597-602.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Hayden, J. D., and S. E. Ades. 2008. The extracytoplasmic stress factor, σE, is required to maintain cell envelope integrity in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 3:e1573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Heidelberg, J. F., et al. 1997. Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability of Gram-negative bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3585-3588.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Hood, A. M. 2009. The effect of open-air factors on the virulence and viability of airborne Francisella tularensis. Epidemiol. Infect. 137:753-761.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Jordan, S., M. I. Hutchings, and T. Mascher. 2008. Cell envelope stress response in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32:107-146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Kong, I.-S., et al. 2004. Role of catalase and oxyR in the viable but nonculturable state of Vibrio vulnificus. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 50:133-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Lighthart, B. 1997. The ecology of bacteria in the alfresco atmosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 23:263-274.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Lighthart, B., and B. T. Shaffer. 1997. Increased airborne bacterial survival as a function of particle content and size. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 27:439-446.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Lleo, M. M., et al. 2001. Resuscitation rate in different enterococcal species in the viable but non-culturable state. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:1095-1102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Majdalani, N., M. Heck, V. Stout, and S. Gottesman. 2005. Role of RcsF in signalling to the Rcs phosphorelay pathway in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187:6770-6778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Marthi, B., V. P. Fieland, M. Walter, and R. J. Seidler. 1990. Survival of bacteria during aerosolization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3463-3467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    May, K. R. 1959. Detecting volatile airborne droplets. Nature 183:742-743.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    May, K. R. 1973. The Collison nebulizer: description, performance and application. J. Aerosol Sci. 4:235-243.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    May, K. R. 1975. An “Ultimate” cascade impactor for aerosol assessment. J. Aerosol Sci. 6:413-419.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Mizunoe, Y., S. N. Wai, T. Ishikawa, A. Takade, and S.-I. Yoshida. 2000. Resuscitation of viable but nonculturable cells of Vibrio haemolyticus induced at low temperature under starvation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186:115-120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Mykytczuk, N. C. S., J. T. Trevors, L. G. Leduc, and G. D. Ferroni. 2007. Fluorescence polarization in studies of bacterial cytoplasmic membrane fluidity under environmental stress. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 95:60-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Nicas, M., W. W. Nazaroff, and A. Hubbard. 2005. Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: emission of respirable pathogens. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2:143-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Raivio, T. L. 2005. Envelope stress responses and Gram-negative bacterial pathogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 56:1119-1128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Reissbrodt, R., H. Heier, H. Tschäpe, R. A. Kingsley, and P. H. Williams. 2000. Resuscitation by ferrioxamine E of stressed Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from soil and water microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4128-4130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Rowley, G., M. Spector, J. Kormanec, and M. Roberts. 2006. Pushing the envelope: extracytoplasmic stress responses in bacterial pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:383-394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Ruiz, N., and T. J. Silhavy. 2005. Sensing external stress: watchdogs of the Escherichia coli cell envelope. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8:122-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Rule, A. M., J. Kesavan, K. J. Schwab, and T. J. Buckley. 2007. Application of flow cytometry for the assessment of preservation and recovery efficiency of bioaerosol samplers spiked with Pantoea agglomerans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:2467-2472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Sinclair, R., S. A. Boone, D. Greenberg, P. Keim, and C. Penn. 2008. Persistence of category A select agents in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:555-563.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Stewart, S., et al. 1995. Effect of impact stresses on microbial recovery on an agar surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1232-1239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Stone, R. C., and D. L. Johnson. 2002. A note on the effect of nebulisation time and pressure on the culturability of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36:536-539.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    Tang, J. W., Y. Li, I. Fames, P. K. Chan, and G. L. Ridgway. 2006. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:100-114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Tang, J. W. 2009. The effect of environmental parameters on the survival of airborne infectious agents. J. R. Soc. Interface 6:S697-S702.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Tellier, R. 2006. Review of aerosol transmission of influenza A virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1657-1662.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Terzieva, S., et al. 1996. Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2264-2272.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Theunissen, H. J. H., N. A. Lemmens-den Toom, A. Burggraaf, E. Stolz, and M. F. Michel. 1993. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the survival of Chlamydia pneumoniae in aerosols. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:2589-2593.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Thomas, R. J., et al. 2008. Characterization and deposition of respirable large- and small-particle bioaerosols. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:6437-6443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Thomson, C. M. A., N. Chanter, and C. M. Wathes. 1992. Survival of toxigenic Pasteurella multocida in aerosols and aqueous liquids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:932-936.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Tong, Y., and B. Lighthart. 1997. Solar radiation has a lethal effect on natural populations of culturable outdoor atmospheric bacteria. Atmos. Environ. 31:897-900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Tong, Y., and B. Lighthart. 1998. Effect of simulated solar radiation on mixed outdoor atmospheric bacterial populations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26:311-316.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Vattakaven, T., P. Bond, G. Bradley, and C. B. Munn. 2006. Differential effects of temperature and starvation on induction of the viable-but-nonculturable state in the coral pathogens Vibrio shiloi and Vibrio tasmaniensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6508-6513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Wai, S. N., Y. Mizunoe, A. Takade, and S. Yoshida. 2000. A comparison of solid and liquid media for resuscitation of starvation- and low-temperature-induced non-culturable cells of Aeromonas hydrophila. Arch. Microbiol. 173:307-310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Walter, M. V., B. Marthi, V. P. Fieland, and L. M. Ganio. 1990. Effect of aerosolization on subsequent bacterial survival. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3468-3472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Willeke, K., et al. 1995. Microbial stress, bounce andaerosolization in bioaerosol samplers. J. Aerosol Sci. 26:S883-S884.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    Zentner, R. J. 1966. Physical and chemical stresses of aerosolisation. Bacteriol. Rev. 30:551-557.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Ziegelhoffer, E. C., and T. J. Donohue. 2009. Bacterial responses to photo-oxidative stress. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:856-863.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Cell Membrane as a Major Site of Damage during Aerosolization of Escherichia coli
Richard J. Thomas, Daniel Webber, Rebecca Hopkins, Andrew Frost, Thomas Laws, Pramukh N. Jayasekera, Timothy Atkins
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2011, 77 (3) 920-925; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01116-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Cell Membrane as a Major Site of Damage during Aerosolization of Escherichia coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Cell Membrane as a Major Site of Damage during Aerosolization of Escherichia coli
Richard J. Thomas, Daniel Webber, Rebecca Hopkins, Andrew Frost, Thomas Laws, Pramukh N. Jayasekera, Timothy Atkins
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2011, 77 (3) 920-925; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01116-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336