Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public Health Microbiology

Counting Legionella Cells within Single Amoeba Host Cells

Helen Y. Buse, Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Helen Y. Buse
National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07392-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Here we present the first attempt to quantify Legionella pneumophila cell numbers within individual amoeba hosts that may be released into engineered water systems. The maximum numbers of culturable L. pneumophila cells grown within Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Naegleria fowleri were 1,348 (mean, 329) and 385 (mean, 44) CFU trophozoite−1, respectively.

TEXT

Legionellosis is a major cause of health burdens associated with drinking water, with Legionella pneumophila accounting for some 29% of all drinking water outbreaks since being reported in the United States (7). Direct exposure to aerosols containing Legionella spp. that are generated from cooling towers, humidifiers, and shower heads is implicated as the vehicle for bacterial transmission (2, 5). While L. pneumophila may be packaged and expelled in vesicles of freshwater ciliates (4), free-living protozoa within the genera Acanthamoeba and Naegleria are often cited as potential hosts and ecological reservoirs for L. pneumophila in drinking water systems (9). Therefore, understanding Legionella-amoeba interactions is considered fundamental to aid in developing control strategies and in supporting quantitative microbial risk assessment models for pathogenic legionellae in drinking water (10). Furthermore, if human-infecting legionellae are largely from amoeba hosts (9), it is critical to understand how many legionellae may be released per host cell within drinking water biofilms in order to enable back calculations of host densities that may result in significant pathogen release events (10). There appear to be no previous data reported on cell counts of intracellular L. pneumophila within single amoeba host cells. Hence, here we present the first attempt to provide intracellular pathogen ranges in Acanthamoeba and Naegleria spp. that may colonize drinking water biofilms.

L. pneumophila strain Bloomington 2 (B2; ATCC 33155), Acanthamoeba polyphaga (ATCC 30461), and Naegleria fowleri (ATCC 30894) were grown as previously described (6). Previous data showed that A. polyphaga and N. fowleri were more susceptible to L. pneumophila B2 at 32 and 30°C, respectively, within 48 h than were other environmental and clinical isolates, which had maximal bacterial growth between 48 and 72 h postinfection (6). Initial tests were performed to determine the Triton-X concentrations necessary to lyse amoebae with minimal effect on L. pneumophila cultivability (Table 1). The preferred protocol consisted of flow cytometric cell sorting (BD FACSAria II; BD Biosciences) of individual amoebae into wells of a microtiter plate, followed by immediate addition of 175 μl of 0.22-μm-filtered (Millipore) drinking water (ftH2O) in order to dilute the Triton-X from 0.02% to <0.01%.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Effect of Triton-X on L. pneumophila cultivability and amoeba lysisa

To achieve a 10:1 infection ratio of bacteria to amoeba cells, 6 × 105 amoebae were incubated with 6 × 106 legionellae or else incubated individually in T25 25-cm2 culture flasks (Corning), using ftH2O as the assay medium. At 0 and 48 h, culture flasks containing only bacteria, only amoebae, or bacteria and amoebae were harvested using a cell scraper. As controls for each experiment, 150 bacterial cells were sorted into 24 wells of a 96-well plate containing either 100 μl of ftH2O or 0.02% Triton-X, and individually infected amoebae were sorted into 24 wells containing 100 μl of ftH2O.

For wells with only L. pneumophila B2 cells, averages of 79 and 84 CFU well−1 were observed for bacteria sorted into ftH2O and 0.02% Triton-X, respectively, indicating that the detergent did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect bacterial cultivability. No legionella CFU were detected in the control wells with unlysed amoeba cells at 0 and 48 h postinfection. For each experiment, infected amoeba cells were sorted into 312 wells containing 100 μl of 0.02% Triton-X and, as stated previously, 175 μl of ftH2O was immediately added to all wells after sorting in order to dilute the Triton-X from 0.02% to <0.01%. Table 1 shows that L. pneumophila B2 incubation in 0.02% Triton-X for up to 4 min results in no loss of legionella cultivability. The process of cell sorting into one 96-well plate required up to 3 min, including the time needed to dilute the Triton-X from 0.02% to <0.01%, thus having no effect on the cultivability of the released L. pneumophila B2 strain. A 10-μl aliquot from each well was plated onto buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) agar plates (BD Diagnostics). The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) was 28 legionella CFU well−1 or per single infected amoeba. Negative controls consisted of wells containing noninfected amoeba cells sorted into wells containing ftH2O.

Cell sorting was performed to capture L. pneumophila-infected cells from forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) gated amoebae (Fig. 1). Initially, amoeba cells were infected for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h and collected at each time point for cell sorting. Several gates were then drawn based on their FSC and SSC profiles, and amoeba cells were collected from each gate. The sort regions (Fig. 1, red-gated cells) were chosen based on the criteria of containing both the vast majority of infected amoeba trophozoites and the highest percentage of infected amoebae 48 to 72 h postinfection. The inset in Fig. 1 shows a representative image of cells contained within the gate that were sorted into tubes and verified for intracellular infection with the aid of an inverted Nikon Eclipse T100F microscope 48 h postinfection (no infected cells were observed at 0 h postinfection). For each infected amoeba, maximums of 1,348 and 385 legionella CFU/host cell were determined using A. polyphaga and N. fowleri hosts, respectively (936 total cells sorted per amoeba host). Thus, it appears that A. polyphaga is more susceptible to strain B2 infection and is a better vehicle for legionella amplification than N. fowleri (P < 0.001) (Table 2). The average numbers of culturable L. pneumophila cells estimated within a host were 329 for A. polyphaga and 44 for N. fowleri.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

FSC and SSC profiles of L. pneumophila-infected amoeba trophozoites. Plots are representative of three independent experiments. A. polyphaga-infected cells (a) and N. fowleri-infected cells (b) at 0 and 48 h after legionella infection. Individual amoeba cells were sorted from a single region (indicated in red) for L. pneumophila CFU enumeration based on forward scatter (FSC-A) and side scatter (SSC-A). Images in insets are representative of sorted cells within the gated region and microscopically verified (magnification, ×400) for intracellular infection at 48 h. Infected cells and uninfected cysts/trophozoites are indicated by black and white arrows, respectively. Black bars, 50 μm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

L. pneumophila growth ranges within single amoeba trophozoitesa

Legionella cells are reported to be 1 to 3 μm in length and 0.5 to 1 μm in width (1). Assuming that the volume of a Legionella cell can be approximated by a sphere of equal volume, the maximum number of bacterial cells that can be contained within a single amoeba was calculated by utilizing the concept of packing density (η), which is defined as the fraction of a volume filled by a given collection of solids, which is, in this case, spheres. Random close packing of spheres in three dimensions gives a packing density of only 0.64 (8). For example, the average widths of A. polyphaga and N. fowleri trophozoites were measured to be approximately 20 μm (19.49 and 19.30 μm, respectively; data not shown), thus giving an average sphere volume of 4,190 μm3. Dividing that by the volume of an average-sized Legionella cell (2 μm in length, 0.75 μm in width) and multiplying by the random close packing density gives an estimate of 1,140 average-sized Legionella cells that may be packed into an average-sized A. polyphaga or N. fowleri trophozoite. In this study, the recorded maximum numbers of legionellae that were observed for infected A. polyphaga trophozoites (1,348 CFU amoeba−1) and N. fowleri trophozoites (385 CFU amoeba−1) are therefore plausible.

The data from this study detail the maximal potential release of L. pneumophila from a single infected trophozoite under conditions that may be representative of drinking water systems. A previous guinea pig aerosol infection model revealed that the median infectious dose of L. pneumophila was <129 bacteria while the 50% lethal dose (LD50) was approximately 105 bacteria (3), indicating that, according to this study, as few as 1 to 75 infected amoebae within aerosols may contain enough pathogenic legionellae to cause health effects. However, significantly more are likely to be necessary, given the low expected efficacy in producing respirable aerosols containing legionellae from a shower or similar drinking water source (10). Future studies will aim to quantify both intracellular growth for a range of L. pneumophila strains within more ecologically relevant free-living amoebae isolated from drinking water biofilms and the density of free-living amoebae within those systems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jay Garland and Michael Ware for their critical review of the manuscript and Michael Ware for his expertise and assistance with the BD FACSAria II flow cytometer.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development reviewed and approved this work for publication.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 31 October 2011.
    • Accepted 29 December 2011.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 6 January 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barbaree JM
    . 1991. Controlling Legionella in cooling towers. ASHRAE J. 33:38–42.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bauer M,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Legionella bacteria in shower aerosols increase the risk of Pontiac fever among older people in retirement homes. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62:913–920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berendt RF,
    2. Young HW,
    3. Allen RG,
    4. Knutsen GL
    . 1980. Dose-response of guinea pigs experimentally infected with aerosols of Legionella pneumophila. J. Infect. Dis. 141:186–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Berk SG,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Packaging of live Legionella pneumophila into pellets expelled by Tetrahymena spp. does not require bacterial replication and depends on a Dot/Icm-mediated survival mechanism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2187–2199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Breiman RF,
    2. et al
    . 1990. Role of air sampling in investigation of an outbreak of legionnaires' disease associated with exposure to aerosols from an evaporative condenser. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1257–1261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Buse HY,
    2. Ashbolt NJ
    . 2011. Differential growth of Legionella pneumophila strains within a range of amoebae at various temperatures associated with in-premise plumbing. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 53:217–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Craun GF,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Causes of outbreaks associated with drinking water in the United States from 1971 to 2006. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:507–528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jaeger HM,
    2. Nagel SR
    . 1992. Physics of the granular state. Science 255:1523–1531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lau HY,
    2. Ashbolt NJ
    . 2009. The role of biofilms and protozoa in Legionella pathogenesis: implications for drinking water. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:368–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schoen ME,
    2. Ashbolt NJ
    . 2011. An in-premise model for Legionella exposure during showering events. Water Res. 45:5826–5836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Counting Legionella Cells within Single Amoeba Host Cells
Helen Y. Buse, Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2012, 78 (6) 2070-2072; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07392-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Counting Legionella Cells within Single Amoeba Host Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Counting Legionella Cells within Single Amoeba Host Cells
Helen Y. Buse, Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2012, 78 (6) 2070-2072; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07392-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336