Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Methods

Dry Collection and Culture Methods for Recovery of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Indoor Home Environments

Meghan F. Davis, Patrick Baron, Lance B. Price, D'Ann L. Williams, Selvi Jeyaseelan, Ian R. Hambleton, Gregory B. Diette, Patrick N. Breysse, Meredith C. McCormack
Meghan F. Davis
aDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Baron
aDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lance B. Price
bDivision of Pathogen Genomics, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D'Ann L. Williams
aDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Selvi Jeyaseelan
cFaculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian R. Hambleton
dChronic Disease Research Centre, Tropical Medicine Research Institute, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory B. Diette
eJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick N. Breysse
aDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meredith C. McCormack
eJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06886-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus in home environments may serve as a reservoir for human colonization, making sampling of indoor surfaces relevant to exposure assessment. Using laboratory experiments and application to homes of asthmatic children in Barbados, we characterize microbiological methods adapted for settings with transportation delays between sampling and initiation of culture.

TEXT

Staphylococcus aureus is an environmentally hardy pathogen (3, 10) found widely in hospital and community environments (15). Home environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has been implicated as a source for recurrent human colonization (1, 7), making evaluation of environmental reservoirs relevant for exposure assessment linked to clinical outcomes.

Most methods for environmental sampling of S. aureus use wet-cloth or medium-based methods adapted from health care settings for use in home environments (1, 11, 14). However, these methods often require special handling for transportation, such as refrigeration, and prompt progression from sample collection to initiation of culture in the laboratory. The ability to use wet or medium-based methods may be constrained where access to laboratory resources is limited.

In this paper, we present a novel strategy for parallel culture enrichment of MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates from dry environmental dust wipe samples. We provide laboratory quantification of method limit of detection (LOD) and describe strains in terms of survival characteristics relevant for sample transport. We adapted this protocol from published sampling and culture methods for S. aureus (2, 4, 8, 15) and applied it to indoor surface sampling in the homes of children with asthma in Barbados, West Indies, during a pilot study involving long lag times between sample collection and culture.

For sampling, we used autoclaved dry electrostatic cloths (Swiffer; Proctor & Gamble) placed in sterile stomacher bags for transport. For culture, 60 to 120 ml Mueller-Hinton broth containing 6.5% NaCl (MHB+) was added initially to the bags. For MRSA only, after a standard 16 to 20 h of incubation at 35°C, 1 ml of MHB+ was inoculated into 9 ml tryptic soy broth with 2.5% NaCl, 3.5 mg/liter cefoxitin, and 10 mg/liter aztreonam (TSB+). MHB+ overnight growths (for MSSA) or TSB+ overnight growths (for MRSA) were plated onto tryptic soy with 5% blood agar. After incubation, distinct colonies based on phenotype were subcultured to Baird Parker agar (2) for 24 to 48 h of incubation. Colonies phenotypic for S. aureus were selected for further testing.

To estimate an LOD, sterilized cloths were spiked with 1-ml inoculations (108 to 10−1 CFU/ml) of ATCC 43300 (MRSA), ATCC 25923 (MSSA), and a field ST80 strain (MRSA) collected from a Barbadian home. To determine strain survival on sterilized electrostatic cloths over time, replicates of 1-ml inoculations (108 to 10−1 CFU/ml) were performed, and spiked cloths were cultured at 3 days and then weekly for 4 weeks. The supplement provides a detailed description of the culture methods and laboratory experiments.

During 2010, 26 asthmatic children were enrolled from a hospital outpatient population in a pilot study investigating household environmental exposures in Barbados. In January (visit one), microbiological samples were collected to assist method development and sampling strategy. Nineteen children remained in the study for a second visit in July 2010 (visit two), which was used to test the adapted culture method.

Field staff wearing nonsterile nitrile gloves sampled the asthmatic child's pillow and a single ∼30-cm2 dusty surface in a common room, typically the top of the refrigerator or entertainment unit. Temperature and relative humidity were determined using a HOBO data logger (Onset; Cape Cod, MA). Field staff conducted interviews and home inspections for household environmental characteristics. Cloths were cultured as described, and suspect S. aureus colonies were confirmed by real-time PCR for femA (MSSA) and mecA (MRSA) genes (Pathogene, LLC). S. aureus isolates were typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) as described previously (5). All appropriate institutional review boards in Barbados and at Johns Hopkins University approved the Barbados pilot study in which this project was nested.

For the laboratory experiments, the average LOD for recovery of S. aureus at time zero was 2.3 CFU/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 160). This field ST80 strain had a lower average LOD (0.3 CFU/ml) than either of the reference S. aureus strains, which had average LODs of 17.8 CFU/ml each (P = 0.01). No LOD attrition was noted for strains between days 0 and 3. On average, 1.7 fewer log CFU (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.0) were detectable per week of the study, controlling for correlation within strains over time (P < 0.001). The supplemental material provides detailed findings.

At the first field visit, 3/51 (6%) samples from 26 homes were S. aureus positive. From the MRSA protocol, one MRSA isolate and one MSSA isolate were cultured. From a subset of 16 samples cultured using the parallel MSSA protocol, one MSSA was isolated. Table 1 provides strain type by household location for isolates from both visits.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

MSSA and MRSA isolates recovered from household environmental surfaces by visit, PCR and MLST results, and location within the household

At the second visit, MRSA was cultured from 2/19 (11%) common room surface samples (repository site) and from 3/19 (16%) pillow samples (site touched by the child). MSSA was cultured from 4/19 (21%) pillow samples. The child's pillow was contaminated with S. aureus at 7 of 8 positive homes (88%). MRSA ST80 was cultured from the top of the refrigerator in the same household 6 months apart. Lag time between collection and culture ranged from 2 to 24 days and was not significantly associated with S. aureus recovery. Generally, S. aureus recovery was not strongly associated with household characteristics (Table 2), except for bedrooms with mold/leaks. When analysis was restricted to S. aureus recovery in bedrooms, this estimate of association strengthened (odds ratio [OR], 14.7; 95% CI, 1.16 to 185.2; P = 0.04). No households reported indoor pets, corroborated by visual inspection. Five households reported outdoor dogs, and S. aureus was not recovered from the indoor environments of these homes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Associations between household and bedroom factors and odds of S. aureus recovery from household surfaces and pillows at the second visit

Barbadian strains were consistent with pandemic clones circulating in Caribbean (13), Latin American (9), and global human populations (12). Finding such strains in home environments on Barbados may indicate that pandemic clones have established circulation patterns on the island.

This study is the first to report on culturing MRSA and MSSA from the home environments of children with asthma. For standard transport within 3 days without refrigeration, this method detected as few as 1 to 100 CFU/cloth. LOD attrition was noted with longer delays. Our research suggests that, even with delays of several weeks, if the initial cloth sample collects at least 108 viable CFU, S. aureus detection is likely given no inhibition or microbial competition. This study is limited by small sample size and scope, and these results may not be generalizable to households in other settings. Considering the potentially intermittent nature of human colonization (6), future studies should explore indoor household environmental sampling to serve as a measure of short-term chronic exposure for human household members in the context of clinical outcomes, including asthma.

(Portions of this work were presented previously at the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology [ISEE] conference in September 2011.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The pilot study in Barbados was funded by the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health. The S. aureus work was funded by the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future. In addition, M.F.D. was supported by a Sommer Scholarship, and M.F.D., P.B., and D.L.W. were supported by Center for a Livable Future fellowships.

We are deeply grateful to the Johns Hopkins Center for Childhood Asthma in the Urban Environment, Sherry-Ann Hutson, the Barbados Asthma Study field staff, Anselm J. M. Hennis, Joseph M. Prospero, Edmund Blades, Andrew Waters, the TGen laboratory staff, Amy E. Peterson, and Ellen K. Silbergeld for their contributions at many stages of this research.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 September 2011.
    • Accepted 10 January 2012.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 27 January 2012.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06886-11.

  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Allen KD,
    2. Anson JJ,
    3. Parsons LA,
    4. Frost NG
    . 1997. Staff carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA 15) and the home environment: a case report. J. Hosp. Infect. 35: 307–311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Baird RM,
    2. Lee WH
    . 1995. Media used in the detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26: 15–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Beard-Pegler M,
    2. Stubbs E,
    3. Vickery AM
    . 1988. Observations on the resistance to drying of staphylococcal strains. J. Med. Microbiol. 26: 251–255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. EFSA
    . 2009. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008. Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates. EFSA J. 7: 1376.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Enright MC,
    2. Day NP,
    3. Davies CE,
    4. Peacock SJ,
    5. Spratt BG
    . 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 1008–1015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lozano C,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Dynamic of nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and ST1 after mupirocin treatment in a family in close contact with pigs. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34: e1–e7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Masterton RG,
    2. Coia JE,
    3. Notman AW,
    4. Kempton-Smith L,
    5. Cookson BD
    . 1995. Refractory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage associated with contamination of the home environment. J. Hosp. Infect. 29: 318–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Oie S,
    2. Hosokawa I,
    3. Kamiya A
    . 2002. Contamination of room door handles by methicillin-sensitive/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hosp. Infect. 51: 140–143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rodriguez-Noriega E,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Latin America. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14: e560–e566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rountree PM
    . 1963. The effect of dessication on the viability of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 61: 265–272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Scott E,
    2. Duty S,
    3. Callahan M
    . 2008. A pilot study to isolate Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus from environmental surfaces in the home. Am. J. Infect. Control 36: 458–460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stenhem M,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Imported methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Sweden. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16: 189–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Uhlemann AC,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from outpatients in the Caribbean reveals the presence of pandemic clones. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1007/s10096-011-1339-2.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Uhlemann A,
    2. et al
    . 2011. The environment as an unrecognized reservoir for community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300: a case-control study. PLoS One 6: e22407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Weese JS
    . 2007. Environmental surveillance for MRSA. Methods Mol. Biol. 391: 201–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Dry Collection and Culture Methods for Recovery of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Indoor Home Environments
Meghan F. Davis, Patrick Baron, Lance B. Price, D'Ann L. Williams, Selvi Jeyaseelan, Ian R. Hambleton, Gregory B. Diette, Patrick N. Breysse, Meredith C. McCormack
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2012, 78 (7) 2474-2476; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06886-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dry Collection and Culture Methods for Recovery of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Indoor Home Environments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dry Collection and Culture Methods for Recovery of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Indoor Home Environments
Meghan F. Davis, Patrick Baron, Lance B. Price, D'Ann L. Williams, Selvi Jeyaseelan, Ian R. Hambleton, Gregory B. Diette, Patrick N. Breysse, Meredith C. McCormack
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Mar 2012, 78 (7) 2474-2476; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06886-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336