Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Bacteriophages Isolated from Chicken Meat and the Horizontal Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Amira Shousha, Nattakarn Awaiwanont, Dmitrij Sofka, Frans J. M. Smulders, Peter Paulsen, Michael P. Szostak, Tom Humphrey, Friederike Hilbert
J. Björkroth, Editor
Amira Shousha
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nattakarn Awaiwanont
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dmitrij Sofka
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans J. M. Smulders
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Paulsen
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael P. Szostak
bInstitute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Humphrey
cMedical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Group, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Friederike Hilbert
aInstitute of Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Björkroth
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00872-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance in microbes poses a global and increasing threat to public health. The horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes was thought to be due largely to conjugative plasmids or transposons, with only a minor part being played by transduction through bacteriophages. However, whole-genome sequencing has recently shown that the latter mechanism could be highly important in the exchange of antimicrobial resistance genes between microorganisms and environments. The transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes by phages could underlie the origin of resistant bacteria found in food. We show that chicken meat carries a number of phages capable of transferring antimicrobial resistance. Of 243 phages randomly isolated from chicken meat, about a quarter (24.7%) were able to transduce resistance to one or more of the five antimicrobials tested into Escherichia coli ATCC 13706 (DSM 12242). Resistance to kanamycin was transduced the most often, followed by that to chloramphenicol, with four phages transducing tetracycline resistance and three transducing ampicillin resistance. Phages able to transduce antimicrobial resistance were isolated from 44% of the samples of chicken meat that we tested. The statistically significant (P = 0.01) relationship between the presence of phages transducing kanamycin resistance and E. coli isolates resistant to this antibiotic suggests that transduction may be an important mechanism for transferring kanamycin resistance to E. coli. It appears that the transduction of resistance to certain antimicrobials, e.g., kanamycin, not only is widely distributed in E. coli isolates found on meat but also could represent a major mechanism for resistance transfer. The result is of high importance for animal and human health.

INTRODUCTION

The use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and the development of antimicrobial resistance, especially in food-producing animals, are currently giving rise to intense discussion (1). Food of animal origin represents an important and direct link between animals and humans. Despite approved recommendations regarding the prudent use of antimicrobial substances in production animals, the rate of resistance to certain classes of antibiotics (e.g., extended-spectrum cephalosporins) used in human medicine continues to rise (2, 3). Escherichia coli, an important indicator bacterium for antimicrobial resistance, can frequently be found on food surfaces and has been reported to be resistant to many different classes of antimicrobial agents. This microorganism easily acquires and carries different antimicrobial resistance elements (in the last report on antimicrobial resistance in the European Union, at least one E. coli isolate was found to be resistant to every single antimicrobial substance tested [4]) and not only transfers these elements within the species but also receives these elements from and transfers them to related microorganisms (5–7). Resistance gene exchange between Salmonella and E. coli has also been described (8).

Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents develops by a variety of mechanisms: (i) by changes within the existing genome of a bacterial cell (mutations) and changes within the proteome (phase variation) (9, 10), (ii) by the formation of bacterial cell interactions (mixed bacterial biofilms) (11), and (iii) most importantly, by the acquisition of new genes through horizontal transfer (12). Bacteria have evolved numerous mechanisms to take up new genes to help them withstand harsh environmental conditions or settle in a new environmental niche. The same mechanism now also enables them to develop antimicrobial resistance (13, 14). Horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes was thought to be largely the result of conjugative plasmids, transposons, or the uptake of naked DNA, with only a minor part being played by transduction by bacteriophages (12, 15, 16).

Phages (bacterial viruses) depend on the bacterial cell to produce viral proteins or peptides. They are very common in all environments, outnumbering their bacterial hosts by 10:1 (17, 18). Bacteriophages are highly diverse and can be classified on the basis of their genome, morphology, and host specificity. Most phages are host specific, but some broad-host-range ones are able to invade different bacterial species and even different genera (19, 20). Infection of bacterial cells occurs when the phage attaches itself to the host cell and injects viral and sometimes foreign DNA (RNA) into it in a penetration step. Phages can be lytic or nonlytic, leading in the former case to the death of the host and in the latter case to the production of bacteria with phage DNA incorporated into their genomes. Temperate phages lead to lysogeny, where the bacterial cell becomes infected for an indefinite period of time. While most bacterial cells eventually lyse, a few are persistently infected (for a review, see reference 21).

A phage can transfer bacterial DNA from one host to the other in a process known as transduction. Specialized transduction occurs frequently in the environment during lysogeny, when a prophage incorrectly excises not only its own DNA but also attached bacterial DNA from the host genome. Phages can store this DNA in the capsid, and during the next infection cycle the bacterial host might integrate the foreign DNA by homologous recombination (22). The process has been documented in different environments, such as in environmental water and on plant surfaces (17). New studies, using whole-genome sequencing, have shown that transduction events have occurred in almost every bacterial isolate sequenced (23). In theory, generalized transduction, in which either a virulent or a temperate phage accidentally packs bacterial DNA instead of phage DNA into its capsid and delivers it to the next host, may occur without the need for homologous recombination between different species of bacteria, although there has not yet been any definitive proof of the phenomenon (16). Broad-host-range plasmids have also been transduced between bacteria of nonrelated species (20).

We tested chicken meat for the presence of phages that infect E. coli (coliphages) and that are able to transduce important antimicrobial resistances. Our results suggest that the transduction of antimicrobial resistance is not, as has been assumed to date, a rare event but is, rather, more common for certain resistance elements. Phages able to transfer antimicrobial resistance are rather diverse, ranging from host-specific ones to those with a broad host range, and the process is not dependent on homologous recombination. This study raises the question about new strategies in combating the transfer of antimicrobial resistance in the food environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and preparation.From May to December 2013, 50 packed, chilled (4°C) chicken meat products were collected from supermarkets, street markets, and butchers in Vienna, Austria. A 25-g portion of each sample was removed from the package and placed into a sterile filter stomacher bag (BBAG03; Corning Gosselin, Hazebrouck, France) under aseptic conditions. Fifty milliliters of sterile 0.9% NaCl was used as a rinsing solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and was added to the bag, which was shaken manually for 3 min. After the rinsing, the saline was used for the isolation of phages and resistant bacteria.

Isolation of resistant Escherichia coli colonies.One milliliter from each of the rinsing solutions was spread onto Coli-ID agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) containing appropriate antimicrobials (ampicillin at 35 μg/ml, tetracycline at 20 μg/ml, kanamycin at 30 μg/ml, and chloramphenicol at 35 μg/ml [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA]) and incubated at 42°C for 24 h. Four presumptive resistant E. coli colonies were further subcultured from the colonized plates onto plate count agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. These E. coli isolates were stored in Luria broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with the addition of 20% (wt/vol) glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at −80°C. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance using standard methods (24).

Isolation of bacteriophages and preparation of lysates.Bacteriophages (virulent and temperate, based on plaque morphology) were isolated as described in standard ISO 10705-2:2000 (25). Briefly, 0.5 ml from an overnight culture of E. coli ATCC 13706 (DSM 12242) was mixed with 50 ml of modified Scholtens' broth, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C with shaking for 1 to 5 h until the culture reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4. One milliliter of this culture and 1 ml of sample rinsing solution were added to 2.5 ml preheated (45°C) modified Scholtens' soft agar (Scholtens' broth plus 0.8% agar), and the mixture was vortexed and immediately spread as an overlay on modified Scholtens' agar plates (Scholtens' broth plus 1.5% agar) at room temperature. These plates were incubated at 37°C for 18 to 20 h. Lysates of plaques were prepared as described by Groisman (26). In brief, plaques (five from each sample) were individually cut out from the soft agar plate and diluted in chloroform (1%, vol/vol), MgSO4 (2 mM), and CaCl2 (0.2 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The solution was vortexed for 10 s and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.2-μm-pore-size filter (Whatman; GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and kept at 4°C for further use.

Titration of bacteriophage.Tenfold serial dilutions (10−1 to 10−6) were prepared from each phage lysate. Mixtures from 1 ml of an overnight culture of E. coli ATCC 13706 and 10 μl from the diluted lysate were added to 2.5 ml preheated (45°C) modified Scholtens' soft agar, vortexed, and immediately spread as an overlay on modified Scholtens' agar plates to solidify at room temperature. After incubation at 37°C for 18 to 20 h, plaques were counted and appropriate dilutions were prepared for transduction and typing. Phage particles were expressed as the number of PFU per milliliter using the following formula: (number of plaques × dilution factor)/ml. Titers were calculated for each phage and ranged from 1.5 × 108 to 3.1 × 1010 PFU/ml.

Transduction.Transduction was performed as described by Groisman with slight variations (26). In brief, 100 μl of an E. coli ATCC 13706 overnight culture was mixed with 10 μl of properly diluted (104 PFU/ml) phage lysate, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min without shaking to allow phage absorption. Two milliliters of modified Scholtens' broth was then added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 to 2 h with shaking. The tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was suspended in 150 μl modified Scholtens' broth and plated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing either ampicillin at 35 μg/ml, tetracycline at 20 μg/ml, kanamycin at 30 μg/ml, or chloramphenicol at 35 μg/ml. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 h. Additionally, to detect the transfer of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production to E. coli, ESBL-Bx plates (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) were incubated. Colonies were subcultured and stored at −80°C in Luria broth with the addition of 20% (wt/vol) glycerol for further analysis.

PCR for identification of resistance genes and Southern blot analysis.Resistance genes in the transduced E. coli isolates were detected by amplification of a partial sequence of the resistance gene by PCR (27) using different primers (Table 1) (primers were synthesized at Microsynth AG, Balgach, Switzerland). DNA was extracted from E. coli using the alkaline lysis method. The PCRs were carried out with a 12.5-μl reaction mixture containing 10 ng DNA, 6.25 μl Kapa2G polymerase from a Fast hot start kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 μM each primer. For Southern blot analysis, whole-genome DNA was restricted with EcoRI, separated on a 1% agarose gel in 1× TAE (Tris-acetate-EDTA) buffer, and transferred to a Hybond N+ membrane using a vacuum blotter (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA, USA). The PCR product of aphA1 was labeled with a DIG High Prime DNA labeling and detection starter kit II (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The hybridization was carried out according to the manufacturer's specifications, and the hybridized product was visualized using an illuminator (ChemiDoc XRS+ system; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Primers and conditions for PCR of resistance genes

Characterization of coliphage.Mixtures from 100-μl overnight cultures of different well-characterized, selected, laboratory E. coli strains with different properties (ATCC 13706, JM109, W3110, MC1061, and DH5α) were used to gain a suitable lysogeny spectrum for the phages, and 2.5 ml preheated (45°C) modified Scholtens' soft agar was spread as an overlay on modified Scholtens' agar plates at room temperature. After solidification, 5 μl of appropriately diluted phage lysates was spotted on these plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h, and the lysogeny spectra of each lysate were recorded.

Statistical analysis.The relation of the presence of transferable elements encoding antimicrobial resistance in coliphages isolated from chicken meat samples to the recovery of phenotypically antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolates from the same samples was studied for four different antimicrobial substances. For this purpose, information on resistance transfer from all phages (typically, five) per sample was combined; i.e., a sample was considered to carry transferable resistance against an antimicrobial substance if at least one of the phages isolated from this sample was able to transfer the respective resistance. The relation of the presence/absence of resistant E. coli to the presence/absence of phages able to transduce the respective antimicrobial resistance was then assessed by Fisher's exact test. The significance level was established at a P value of <0.05.

RESULTS

Detection of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli isolates in chicken meat.One or more resistant E. coli isolates whose resistance was determined using antimicrobial susceptibility testing by broth microdilution could be isolated from 47 out of 50 chicken meat samples using selective plating. Most E. coli isolates were resistant to ampicillin (44 of 50 samples), followed by tetracycline (40 of 50 samples). Kanamycin-resistant isolates were found in 22 chicken meat samples, and chloramphenicol-resistant isolates were found in 18. Table 2 shows the numbers of samples with the different types of resistant E. coli isolates. Ampicillin-resistant as well as tetracycline-resistant E. coli strains were found the most often in the chicken meat samples (n = 12, 24%); this was followed by E. coli isolates resistant to all different antimicrobials tested and E. coli isolates resistant to ampicillin, kanamycin, and tetracycline (n = 10 [20%] for each group). Six samples harbored ampicillin-resistant E. coli isolates only. Five samples carried E. coli isolates with resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, as well as tetracycline. Three samples did not harbor any E. coli isolates resistant to the tested antimicrobial substances. One sample each held E. coli strains resistant to tetracycline only; chloramphenicol and tetracycline; chloramphenicol, kanamycin, and tetracycline; and ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and kanamycin.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Numbers of chicken meat samples by type of resistant E. coli isolate

Resistance-transducing phage isolated from chicken meat.Coliphages were detected in all but one chicken meat sample. The sample with no coliphage did not hold any resistant E. coli isolates. About 90% of the phages isolated revealed a clear plaque morphology, and 10% produced a cloudy center. Of all phages randomly isolated from chicken meat (n = 243), about a quarter (n = 60) were able to transduce one or more of the tested antimicrobial resistances into E. coli ATCC 13706. Phages able to transduce antimicrobial resistance were isolated from 22 out of a total of 50 chicken meat samples. Phages which transduced kanamycin resistance only were isolated from seven chicken meat samples. Phages transducing kanamycin and chloramphenicol resistance were found in six samples. Phages from three samples could transduce either kanamycin or ampicillin resistance. Chloramphenicol resistance-transducing phages were recovered from three samples. Phages with the ability to transduce resistance to tetracycline only were seen in another two samples, and kanamycin and tetracycline resistance-transducing phages were isolated from one sample.

Antimicrobial resistance transduced by phages.Kanamycin resistance could be transduced the most often, i.e., by 43 phages. Eight phages were able to transduce chloramphenicol resistance, and four transduced tetracycline resistance. Three phages could transduce ampicillin and kanamycin resistance, and two transduced chloramphenicol and kanamycin resistance (Fig. 1). No phages were able to transduce extended-spectrum β-lactamase production to E. coli ATCC 13706.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Proportion of resistance-transducing phages among all isolated phages. Kanamycin resistance-transducing phages were detected the most often (n = 43 of 243 phages detected), followed by chloramphenicol (n = 8) and tetracycline (n = 4) resistance-transducing phages. Three phages were found to transduce kanamycin plus ampicillin resistance, and two phages transduced kanamycin plus chloramphenicol resistance. ϕCmr, ϕKmr, ϕTetr, ϕKmr Ampr, and ϕKmr Cmr, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, tetracycline, kanamycin and ampicillin, and kanamycin and chloramphenicol resistance-transducing phages, respectively.

Coliphage characterization.An optimized titer was defined by titration of phages (n = 243) isolated from chicken meat. The titer of each phage was calculated to range from 1.5 × 108 to 3.1 × 1010 PFU/ml. For a brief characterization of the antimicrobial resistance-transducing phages, a lysotype pattern was determined for five different E. coli strains (ATCC 13706, JM109, W3110, MC1061, and DH5α) using lysates of each phage whose titers had been determined. Table 3 lists the different lysotypes of all antimicrobial resistance-transducing phages. A high degree of variability, given by 13 different lysotypes, was seen within these phages isolated from chicken meat.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Lysotypes of antimicrobial resistance-transducing phages

Detection of resistance genes in transduced E. coli isolates.The tet(A) gene fragment could be amplified from all transduced tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. All transduced kanamycin-resistant E. coli isolates harbored the aphA1 gene. All but one E. coli isolate to which ampicillin resistance was transduced harbored the blaTEM gene. The floR gene was detected in three transduced chloramphenicol-resistant E. coli isolates. Southern blot analysis of five kanamycin-resistant isolates of E. coli ATCC 13706 transduced with phage ϕΕ5c uncovered that the aphA1 gene integrated at different sites in the genome; thus, homologous recombination was not required.

Association of resistance-transducing phages and E. coli in meat samples.A statistically significant association between the presence/absence of resistant E. coli isolates and the presence/absence of phages able to transduce the same antimicrobial resistance into E. coli ATCC 13706 in chicken meat samples was established for kanamycin (P = 0.01) (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Association between isolation of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli and resistance-transducing phages from the same chicken meat sample

DISCUSSION

Although transduction of the antibiotic resistance island in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage type DT104 has been effectively shown (28), until very recently, transduction via bacteriophages was assumed to play a minor part in the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes (12, 15). Food of animal origin is a well-known vehicle allowing the transfer of bacteria from food-producing animals to humans, as reflected by the increasing incidence of foodborne zoonotic diseases in humans and the rising numbers of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria found on food of animal origin. Such food thus represents a possible source of antimicrobial resistance in the human environment and is included in many antimicrobial screening programs. The increasing numbers of resistant bacteria, both commensals and foodborne pathogens, on food are a cause of concern to public health authorities, veterinarians, and physicians. Strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance have enjoyed only limited success, and there are still many questions relating to how and when resistance transfer occurs. The presence of phages that transfer antimicrobial resistance could explain the failures to combat antimicrobial resistance described above. We now show, based on mathematical modeling, that chicken meat can carry a considerable number of phages capable of transferring antimicrobial resistance and that certain antimicrobial resistance genes may be transferred primarily by phages. We tested randomly selected coliphages from chicken meat samples for their ability to transduce resistance to tetracycline (an antimicrobial widely used in veterinary medicine, in aquaculture, and on plants and thus extensively released into the environment, although its photodegradation is fairly rapid), ampicillin (a β-lactam antibiotic and, thus, a compound typical of a range of compounds that are important in veterinary and human medicine and that have a very short half-life in the environment), chloramphenicol (which is banned in veterinary medicine but which is still found in the environment), and kanamycin (an aminoglycoside which is commonly used as a second-choice antibiotic in human medicine and which can be found in aquatic environments because of its long degradation time) (29, 30). About a quarter of the randomly selected phages were able to transduce resistance to one or more of these antimicrobials to E. coli ATCC 13706. Thus, the actual number of phages found on chicken meat able to transduce antibiotic resistance genes must be much higher, as we tested for resistance to only five different antibiotics and randomly chose only five phages per sample (from a plate with 10 to 300 plaques). Accordingly, our results confirm speculations that transduction may have a role in the exchange of antimicrobial resistance between microorganisms and, thus, between environments (17, 31–34). Chicken meat has been reported to harbor a high number of resistant E. coli isolates (63% of E. coli strains randomly isolated from chicken meat in Austria were resistant) (7). Resistance to tetracycline has been described to be the most prevalent. In this study, we detected tetracycline resistance-transducing phages in three different types of chicken meat samples (a total of 50 samples).

By means of a mathematical model (16) of the transfer of resistance to E. coli by transduction in the gut of cattle, it has been estimated that transduction is on the order of 1,000-fold less efficient than bacterial conjugation at transferring genes (16). It is thus not surprising that resistance to tetracycline and ampicillin, which are the antimicrobials to which E. coli strains isolated from food are the most frequently resistant (27, 35–38), is not significantly associated with phages that transfer resistance. Thus, phage transduction may not be the major mechanism for tetracycline resistance transfer to E. coli strains found on chicken meat. In contrast, phages that transfer kanamycin resistance were more frequently recovered and were significantly associated with the presence of resistant E. coli isolates in the samples that we investigated. These findings indicate not only that phages appear to represent a substantial reservoir of antimicrobial resistance transfer but also demonstrate that different mechanisms of resistance depend on different transfer strategies. Although kanamycin-resistant E. coli isolates are not common in food of animal origin (7, 35), our data show, for the first time, that phage transduction might be a major mechanism for transferring this resistance trait. Although the elements used to transfer tetracycline and ampicillin resistance appear to be dominated by conjugative plasmids or transposons, phages have been shown able to transfer all types of resistance tested, except that associated with ESBL production. ESBL-producing E. coli strains can be found on chicken meat, but data suggest that clonal dissemination is the most prevalent means (39). The resistance genes transduced to E. coli were those most commonly found [aphA1, blaTEM, floR, and tet(A)] in these bacteria on chicken meat (27, 36–38). As an example, one gene found to be transduced and to deliver chloramphenicol resistance is the E. coli floR gene, which is almost identical to the floR gene of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium phage type DT104 and is located in the antimicrobial resistance island flanked by two class 1 integrons.

Recently, lytic phages have been used in phage therapy for the treatment of colibacillosis caused by multiresistant chicken-pathogenic E. coli strains (40) or for reducing Campylobacter loads in chickens (41). Considering our results, there could possibly be a risk of transduction of antibiotic resistance genes by these phages. Testing the transduction ability of these therapeutic phages could be a tool for avoiding the transduction of antibiotic resistance by these phages.

Phages differ from their bacterial hosts in a number of important properties, such as their ability to persist in the presence of disinfectants (42, 43). Thus, disinfectants used to kill bacteria are, in many cases, not able to eliminate bacteriophages. Some phages are highly resistant to sodium hypochlorite at the concentrations used in the food industry, and this disinfectant does not eliminate or reduce the numbers of most bacteriophages (42). Alcoholic solutions, such as 70% ethanol, have been reported to be unable to harm most bacteriophages (42, 43). It appears that only peracetic acid is a reliable disinfectant for most bacteriophages (42), but at present, this is not extensively used for disinfection. It is thus highly likely that phages survive under routine conditions of disinfection not only in the food industry.

Our results show for the first time that generalized transduction without the need for homologous recombination is a neglected but nevertheless efficient way to transfer antimicrobial resistance to E. coli in different environments, including in food of animal origin. This conclusion has important consequences for hygiene, sanitation, and public health when it is important to combat antimicrobial resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Amira Shousha was granted a Vetmeduni Success Scholarship from the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria, to perform this study. Nattakarn Awaiwanont was funded by the Technologiestipendien Südostasien in the framework of ASEA-UNINET, granted by the OeAD (Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education & Research), financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science and Research.

We thank Stefan Hertwig for discussions and Graham Tebb for critical reading of and suggestions on the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 March 2015.
    • Accepted 22 April 2015.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 1 May 2015.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Laube H,
    2. Friese A,
    3. von Salviati C,
    4. Guerra B,
    5. Käsbohrer A,
    6. Kreienbrock L,
    7. Roesler U
    . 2013. Longitudinal monitoring of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli at German broiler chicken fattening farms. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4815–4820. doi:10.1128/AEM.00856-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bronzwaer S,
    2. Lönnroth A,
    3. Haigh R
    . 2004. The European Community strategy against antimicrobial resistance. Euro Surveill 9(1):pii=441. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=441.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vogt D,
    2. Overesch G,
    3. Endimiani A,
    4. Collaud A,
    5. Thomann A,
    6. Perreten V
    . 2014. Occurrence and genetic characteristics of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Swiss retail meat. Microb Drug Resist 20:485–494. doi:10.1089/mdr.2013.0210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2015. EU summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2013. EFSA J 13:4036. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4036.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ibekwe AM,
    2. Murinda SE,
    3. Graves AK
    . 2011. Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from human and animal sources uncovers multiple resistances from human sources. PLoS One 6:e20819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kruse H,
    2. Sørum H
    . 1994. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4015–4021.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mayrhofer S,
    2. Paulsen P,
    3. Smulders FJM,
    4. Hilbert F
    . 2006. Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from muscle foods as related to the veterinary use of antimicrobial agents in food-producing animals in Austria. Microb Drug Resist 12:278–283. doi:10.1089/mdr.2006.12.278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gunell M,
    2. Webber MA,
    3. Kotilainen P,
    4. Lilly AJ,
    5. Caddick JM,
    6. Jalava J,
    7. Huovinen P,
    8. Siitonen A,
    9. Hakanen AJ,
    10. Piddock LJV
    . 2009. Mechanisms of resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica strains exhibiting a nonclassical quinolone resistance phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3832–3836. doi:10.1128/AAC.00121-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Woodford N,
    2. Ellington MJ
    . 2007. The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:5–18. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01492.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mempel M,
    2. Feucht H,
    3. Ziebuhr W,
    4. Endres M,
    5. Laufs R,
    6. Grüter L
    . 1994. Lack of mecA transcription in slime-negative phase variants of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:1251–1255. doi:10.1128/AAC.38.6.1251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mah TF
    . 2012. Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7:1061–1072. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Boerlin P,
    2. Reid-Smith RJ
    . 2008. Antimicrobial resistance: its emergence and transmission. Anim Health Res Rev 9:115–126. doi:10.1017/S146625230800159X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Martinez JL,
    2. Fajardo A,
    3. Garmendia L,
    4. Hernandez A,
    5. Linares JF,
    6. Martínez-Solano L,
    7. Sánchez MB
    . 2009. A global view of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:44–65. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00142.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wiedenbeck J,
    2. Cohan FM
    . 2011. Origins of bacterial diversity through horizontal genetic transfer and adaptation to new ecological niches. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:957–976. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00292.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Normark BH,
    2. Normark S
    . 2002. Evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance. J Intern Med 252:91–106. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01026.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Volkova VV,
    2. Lu Z,
    3. Besser T,
    4. Gröhn YT
    . 2014. Modeling the infection dynamics of bacteriophages in enteric Escherichia coli: estimating the contribution of transduction to antimicrobial gene spread. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4350–4362. doi:10.1128/AEM.00446-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fineran PC,
    2. Petty NK,
    3. Salmond GPC
    . 2009. Transduction: host DNA transfer by bacteriophages, p 666–679. In Schaechter M (ed), The desk encyclopedia of microbiology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hendrix RW,
    2. Smith MCM,
    3. Burns RN,
    4. Ford ME,
    5. Hatfull GF
    . 1999. Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world's a phage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:2192–2197. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.5.2192.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Schwarzer D,
    2. Buettner FFR,
    3. Browning C,
    4. Nazarov S,
    5. Rabsch W,
    6. Bethe A,
    7. Oberbeck A,
    8. Bowman VD,
    9. Stummeyer K,
    10. Mühlenhoff M,
    11. Leiman PG,
    12. Gerardy-Schahn R
    . 2012. A multivalent adsorption apparatus explains the broad host range of phage phi92: a comprehensive genomic and structural analysis. J Virol 86:10384–10398. doi:10.1128/JVI.00801-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Evans TJ,
    2. Crow MA,
    3. Williamson NR,
    4. Orme W,
    5. Thomson NR,
    6. Komitopoulou E,
    7. Salmond GPC
    . 2010. Characterization of a broad-host-range flagellum-dependent phage that mediates high-efficiency generalized transduction in, and between, Serratia and Pantoea. Microbiology 156:240–247. doi:10.1099/mic.0.032797-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Weitz JS,
    2. Poisot T,
    3. Meyer JR,
    4. Flores CO,
    5. Valverde S,
    6. Sullivan MB,
    7. Hochberg ME
    . 2013. Phage-bacteria infection networks. Trends Microbiol 21:82–91. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Kottadiel VI,
    3. Vafabakhsh R,
    4. Dai L,
    5. Chemla YR,
    6. Ha T,
    7. Rao VB
    . 2011. A promiscuous DNA packaging machine from bacteriophage T4. PLoS Biol 9:e1000592. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schmieder R,
    2. Edwards R
    . 2012. Insights into antibiotic resistance through metagenomic approaches. Future Microbiol 7:73–89. doi:10.2217/fmb.11.135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    EUCAST. 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/.
  25. 25.↵
    International Organization for Standardization. 2000. Water quality—detection and enumeration of bacteriophages. Part 2. Enumeration of somatic coliphages. ISO 10705-2:2000. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Groisman EA
    . 1991. In vivo genetic engineering with bacteriophage Mu. Methods Enzymol 204:180–212. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(91)04010-L.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sacher A
    . 2008. Ph.D. thesis. Veterinärmedizinischen Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Schmieger H,
    2. Schicklmaier P
    . 1999. Transduction of multiple drug resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol Lett 170:251–256. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13381.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Milić N,
    2. Milanović M,
    3. Grujić Letić N,
    4. Sekulić MT,
    5. Radonić J,
    6. Mihajlović I,
    7. Miloradov MV
    . 2013. Occurrence of antibiotics as emerging contaminant substances in aquatic environment. Int J Environ Health Res 23:296–310. doi:10.1080/09603123.2012.733934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Chang VWC,
    3. Giannis A,
    4. Wang J-Y
    . 2013. Removal of cytostatic drugs from aquatic environment: a review. Sci Total Environ 445-446:281–298. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.061.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Balcazar JL
    . 2014. Bacteriophages as vehicles for antibiotic resistance genes in the environment. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004219. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Colomer-Lluch M,
    2. Imamovic L,
    3. Jofre J,
    4. Muniesa M
    . 2011. Bacteriophages carrying antibiotic resistance genes in fecal waste from cattle, pigs, and poultry. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4908–4911. doi:10.1128/AAC.00535-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Colomer-Lluch M,
    2. Jofre J,
    3. Muniesa M
    . 2011. Antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteriophage DNA fraction of environmental samples. PLoS One 6:e17549. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Modi SR,
    2. Lee HH,
    3. Spina CS,
    4. Collins JJ
    . 2013. Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature 499:219–222. doi:10.1038/nature12212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    AURES. 2012. Resistenzbericht Österreich. Federal Ministry of Health, Vienna, Austria. http://www.referenzzentrum.at.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sheikh AA,
    2. Checkley S,
    3. Avery B,
    4. Chalmers G,
    5. Bohaychuk V,
    6. Boerlin P,
    7. Reid-Smith R,
    8. Aslam M
    . 2012. Antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from retail meat purchased in Alberta, Canada. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:625–631. doi:10.1089/fpd.2011.1078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Van TTH,
    2. Chin J,
    3. Chapman T,
    4. Tran LT,
    5. Coloe PJ
    . 2008. Safety of raw meat and shellfish in Vietnam: an analysis of Escherichia coli isolations for antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Int J Food Microbiol 124:217–223. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Zhao S,
    2. Blickenstaff K,
    3. Bodeis-Jones S,
    4. Gaines SA,
    5. Tong E,
    6. McDermott PF
    . 2012. Comparison of the prevalences and antimicrobial resistances of Escherichia coli isolates from different retail meats in the United States, 2002 to 2008. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1701–1707. doi:10.1128/AEM.07522-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Day MJ,
    3. Mafura MT,
    4. Nunez-Garcia J,
    5. Fenner JJ,
    6. Sharma M,
    7. van Essen-Zandbergen A,
    8. Rodríguez I,
    9. Dierikx C,
    10. Kadlec K,
    11. Schink AK,
    12. Wain J,
    13. Helmuth R,
    14. Guerra B,
    15. Schwarz S,
    16. Threlfall J,
    17. Woodward MJ,
    18. Woodford N,
    19. Coldham N,
    20. Mevius D
    . 2013. Comparative analysis of ESBL-positive Escherichia coli isolates from animals and humans from the UK, The Netherlands and Germany. PLoS One 8:e75392. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Wenli L,
    3. Wenhua L,
    4. Ling Z,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Kai L,
    7. Huiying R
    . 2013. T4-like phage Bp7, a potential antimicrobial agent for controlling drug-resistant Escherichia coli in chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5559–5565. doi:10.1128/AEM.01505-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kittler S,
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Abdulmawjood A,
    4. Glünder G,
    5. Klein G
    . 2013. Effect of bacteriophage application on Campylobacter jejuni loads in commercial broiler flocks. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7525–7533. doi:10.1128/AEM.02703-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Mercanti DJ,
    2. Guglielmotti DM,
    3. Patrignani F,
    4. Reinheimer JA,
    5. Quiberoni A
    . 2012. Resistance of two temperate Lactobacillus paracasei bacteriophages to high pressure homogenization, thermal treatments and chemical biocides of industrial application. Food Microbiol 29:99–104. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2011.09.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Capra ML,
    2. Quiberoni A,
    3. Reinheimer JA
    . 2004. Thermal and chemical resistance of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei bacteriophages. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:499–504. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01525.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    1. Ng LK,
    2. Martin I,
    3. Alfa M,
    4. Mulvey M
    . 2001. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes 15:209–215. doi:10.1006/mcpr.2001.0363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.
    1. Sandvang D,
    2. Aarestrup FM
    . 2000. Characterization of aminoglycoside resistance genes and class 1 integrons in porcine and bovine gentamicin-resistant Escherichia coli. Microb Drug Resist 6:19–27. doi:10.1089/mdr.2000.6.19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.
    1. Chen S,
    2. Zhao S,
    3. White DG,
    4. Schroeder CM,
    5. Lu R,
    6. Yang H,
    7. McDermott PF,
    8. Ayers S,
    9. Meng J
    . 2004. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1–7. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.1.1-7.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.
    1. Henriques I,
    2. Moura A,
    3. Alves A,
    4. Saavedra MJ,
    5. Correia A
    . 2006. Analysing diversity among β-lactamase encoding genes in aquatic environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:418–429. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00073.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.
    1. Maynard C,
    2. Fairbrother JM,
    3. Bekal S,
    4. Sanschagrin F,
    5. Levesque RC,
    6. Brousseau R,
    7. Masson L,
    8. Lariviére S,
    9. Harel J
    . 2003. Antimicrobial resistance genes in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli O149:K91 isolates obtained over a 23-year period from pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3214–3221. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.10.3214-3221.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Bacteriophages Isolated from Chicken Meat and the Horizontal Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
Amira Shousha, Nattakarn Awaiwanont, Dmitrij Sofka, Frans J. M. Smulders, Peter Paulsen, Michael P. Szostak, Tom Humphrey, Friederike Hilbert
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jun 2015, 81 (14) 4600-4606; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00872-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bacteriophages Isolated from Chicken Meat and the Horizontal Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Bacteriophages Isolated from Chicken Meat and the Horizontal Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
Amira Shousha, Nattakarn Awaiwanont, Dmitrij Sofka, Frans J. M. Smulders, Peter Paulsen, Michael P. Szostak, Tom Humphrey, Friederike Hilbert
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jun 2015, 81 (14) 4600-4606; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00872-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336