Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Protozoan Cysts Act as a Survival Niche and Protective Shelter for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria

Ellen Lambrecht, Julie Baré, Natascha Chavatte, Wim Bert, Koen Sabbe, Kurt Houf
H. Goodrich-Blair, Editor
Ellen Lambrecht
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Baré
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natascha Chavatte
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wim Bert
Nematology Research Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koen Sabbe
Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt Houf
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Goodrich-Blair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01031-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The production of cysts, an integral part of the life cycle of many free-living protozoa, allows these organisms to survive adverse environmental conditions. Given the prevalence of free-living protozoa in food-related environments, it is hypothesized that these organisms play an important yet currently underinvestigated role in the epidemiology of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Intracystic bacterial survival is highly relevant, as this would allow bacteria to survive the stringent cleaning and disinfection measures applied in food-related environments. The present study shows that strains of widespread and important foodborne bacteria (Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Listeria monocytogenes) survive inside cysts of the ubiquitous amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii, even when exposed to either antibiotic treatment (100 μg/ml gentamicin) or highly acidic conditions (pH 0.2) and resume active growth in broth media following excystment. Strain- and species-specific differences in survival periods were observed, with Salmonella enterica surviving up to 3 weeks inside amoebal cysts. Up to 53% of the cysts were infected with pathogenic bacteria, which were located in the cyst cytosol. Our study suggests that the role of free-living protozoa and especially their cysts in the persistence and epidemiology of foodborne bacterial pathogens in food-related environments may be much more important than hitherto assumed.

INTRODUCTION

Foodborne pathogenic bacteria are a major cause of foodborne illness and have important implications for human public health along with economic consequences (1). Despite thorough disinfection protocols and hygiene monitoring during food production and processing, pathogenic bacteria often persist in food-related environments and on food, suggesting that our knowledge about the transmission routes and epidemiology of foodborne pathogenic bacteria is still incomplete.

Recent studies have shown that bacteria can benefit from intracellular associations with free-living protozoa (FLP) (2, 3), heterotrophic eukaryotic microorganisms that are common in natural aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (4). Although FLP feed on bacteria, some bacteria resist digestion. These so-called “digestion-resistant bacteria” can survive and even grow inside their FLP hosts (5). These hosts thus effectively act as a reservoir, shelter, and vector for the bacteria and can as such play an important role in their ecology (3, 6). Intracellular association with FLP has also been demonstrated for human-pathogenic bacteria (7, 8), including food-related pathogens (e.g., see references 5, 9, and 10). As FLP have been isolated from diverse food-related habitats, such as broiler houses (11–13), meat cutting plants (14), domestic refrigerators (15), and vegetables (16, 17), this suggests that FLP may be implicated in the epidemiology of foodborne pathogens.

Many FLP have two life cycle stages: the trophozoite and the dormant cyst. The former is the actively feeding stage, preying on bacteria, algae, viruses, yeast, and organic particles by phago- and pinocytosis (18). Encystment (i.e., conversion from trophozoite to cyst) is triggered by adverse environmental conditions, such as food shortage, hyper- or hypo-osmolarity, temperature, and pH extremes (18). Cysts usually possess a thick, often double or multilayered protective wall, consisting of lipids, (glyco)proteins, and carbohydrates like chitin and cellulose. This protects the protozoon against unfavorable environmental conditions, such as freezing (19), gamma and UV radiation (20), and chemicals used for disinfection in health care settings (21) and drinking water production (22, 23). Some cysts can withstand desiccation for more than 20 years (24). Under favorable conditions, excystment (i.e., reconversion into trophozoites) takes place.

To date, most studies on interactions between FLP and bacteria (including pathogenic bacteria) have focused on the trophozoite stage. In contrast, little is known about bacterial association with the cyst forms, which, given their high tolerance for adverse environmental conditions and hence also high dispersal capacity (18), are especially relevant from an ecological and epidemiological point of view. It is expected that FLP cysts are even more effective as a shelter and vector for internalized bacteria than the trophozoites. It has indeed been shown that some internalized digestion-resistant bacteria, including human pathogens, can survive the encystment process and may use the cysts as a shelter against harsh environmental conditions (19, 25). When environmental conditions become favorable, excystment occurs and internalized bacteria are released (or trigger their release), allowing these bacteria to colonize new habitats (26).

As FLP can act as a vector and shelter, there is a growing concern that cysts may play a role in the contamination and persistence of pathogenic bacteria in food-related environments. Cysts may thus enable internalized foodborne pathogens to survive physical and chemical cleaning and disinfection methods (21, 23). To date, long-term intracystic survival of foodborne pathogenic bacteria isolated from food had never been assessed. In order to evaluate the role of FLP in the persistence of foodborne bacterial pathogens, more information is needed on intracellular bacterial survival during the en- and excystment processes and on survival duration inside the FLP cysts. To this end, two strains each of the five most frequently reported foodborne pathogenic bacteria with a considerable impact on public health and the food industry (27) were selected: Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Listeria monocytogenes. The amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii was used as an FLP organism, as it is frequently detected in food-related environments (11, 15). In the present study, we (i) investigated the uptake/invasion efficiency of these foodborne bacteria by A. castellanii trophozoites, (ii) determined the long-term survival capacities of these bacteria inside amoebal cysts using an uniform experimental design, (iii) evaluated the impact of bacteria on protozoan encystment, and (iv) assessed the exact location of these bacteria inside the cysts. To date, survival inside Acanthamoeba cysts has been reported for Mycobacterium spp. (19, 28), Francisella tularensis (26), Legionella spp. (25), Simkania negevensis (29), Escherichia coli (30, 31), Vibrio spp. (32), Enterobacter aerogenes, Aeromonas hydrophila (33), and some obligate endosymbionts, among which is Protochlamydia amoebophila (34, 35). The present study specifically addresses the association mode and survival duration of the most common foodborne pathogens inside FLP cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Amoebal strain and culture conditions.Acanthamoeba castellanii (ATCC 30234; American Type Culture Collection) was grown axenically in proteose-peptone-yeast extract-glucose medium (PYG) (ATCC recipe; www.lgcstandards-atcc.org) at 25°C in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks. Light microscopic observations and plating of culture samples on plate count agar (PCA) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), which were incubated at 30°C for 48 h, were performed to verify the axenicity of the cultures. After 3.5 days, the amoebae formed a confluent monolayer and were harvested by tapping flasks and subsequent centrifugation of the cell suspensions (300 × g for 5 min). Amoebae were washed with Page's amoeba saline (PAS) (ATCC recipe) and suspended in high-saline (HS) buffer (0.1 M KCl, 8 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 0.02 M Tris, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 1 mM NaHCO3 [pH 9]), the medium that will also be used in further experiments to induce encystment (28). The number of viable trophozoites at the start of each experiment was determined by trypan blue exclusion assays (10) using a Füchs-Rosenthal counting chamber (Blaubrand, Wertheim, Germany) and adjusted to 5 × 105 viable trophozoites/ml HS buffer.

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.Throughout this study, 10 strains belonging to five foodborne pathogenic bacterial species were used: a C. jejuni isolate from chicken sausage, displaying low invasiveness properties toward Caco2 cells, and a high-invasiveness C. jejuni isolate from marinated chicken wings (9); S. enterica serotypes Typhimurium and Enteritidis, both isolated from pig carcasses; enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) E. coli biotypes O:157 and O:26, isolated from cattle carcasses; Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 4/O:3, isolated from pig carcass, and bioserotype 2/O:9 from minced pork meat (10), both carrying the virulence plasmid (pYV); and L. monocytogenes serotype 4b, isolated from dry sausage, and 1/2a, isolated from salami. All strains were preserved in glycerol at −20°C before use, except for the C. jejuni strains, which were stored at −80°C in defibrinated horse blood (E&O Laboratories, Ltd., Bonnybridge, Scotland). Campylobacter jejuni strains were cultivated in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) supplemented with 5% (vol/vol) lysed defibrinated horse blood under microaerobic conditions (6% CO2, 6% H2, 4% O2, 84% N2), while other bacterial strains were cultivated in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). For all experiments, all strains were cultivated at 37°C until the stationary growth phase was reached. On the basis of growth curve parameters (data not shown), bacteria were suspended and diluted in HS buffer to ca. 5 × 107 CFU/ml. To determine the exact number of viable, cultivable bacteria used in the experiments, serial dilutions were plated on PCA and incubated for 48 h at 30°C, except for Campylobacter. For the latter, suspensions were plated on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) followed by 48 h of incubation at 42°C under microaerobic conditions.

Coculture experiments.All coculture experiments with A. castellanii and the 10 foodborne bacterial strains were performed in HS buffer at 25°C. All media and products used during the assays were acclimatized to the desired temperature before the start of the experiments. First invasion/uptake assays were performed to evaluate the bacterial invasion/uptake efficiency by amoebal trophozoites. Then encystment monitoring assays were performed to assess whether the presence of bacteria influenced the kinetics of the encystment process and vice versa. Finally long-term intracystic survival assays and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis were carried out to assess the presence and viability (after excystment) of bacteria inside cysts at different time points.

Invasion/uptake assays.Invasion/uptake assays were carried out as described previously (26, 36) with small modifications. Culture flasks (25-cm2) were seeded with Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites (10 ml/flask at a concentration of ca. 5 × 105 cells/ml HS buffer) and incubated at 25°C for 1 h to allow amoebal settlement and adhesion prior to infection. The medium was gently removed, and 10 ml bacterial suspension at a concentration of ca. 5 × 107 CFU/ml HS was added to each flask to obtain a coculture with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of ca. 100 bacteria per amoeba. Bacterial and amoebal monocultures were set up as controls. After 30 min of (co)cultivation at 25°C, cells were washed with HS buffer and treated with gentamicin sulfate solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml HS buffer for 2 h at 25°C to kill extracellular bacteria. The amoebae were then washed with HS buffer to remove the gentamicin and lysed with 0.5% sodium deoxycholate for 5 min to recover intra-amoebal bacteria. This treatment was effective (100%) in lysing amoebal trophozoites without affecting bacterial viability (data not shown). As during the invasion/uptake assays, amoebae were incubated in HS buffer for only a short time: no conversion to cysts took place. Cell suspensions of coculture and amoebal monoculture control setups were plated on MHA (Campylobacter) or PCA (Salmonella, Escherichia, Listeria, or Yersinia) as described above to determine viable intra-amoebal CFU counts.

Encystment monitoring assays.Acanthamoeba trophozoites were infected with bacteria (MOI of 100:1 in HS buffer) as described for the invasion/uptake assays and incubated at 25°C for 6 days. Amoebal and bacterial monocultures in HS buffer were set up as controls. The encystment of Acanthamoeba was verified with a light microscope. At day 0 (d0) and on d1, -2, -3, -4, and -6, viable trophozoites and cysts were counted by trypan blue exclusion assays in a Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chamber. The number of mature cysts was determined by lysis of trophozoites and immature cysts by 3% HCl (28, 37). The number of extra-amoebal bacteria during encystment and of bacteria in the monoculture controls was determined by plating serial dilutions on MHA or PCA, as described above.

Long-term intracystic survival assays.To assess if bacteria were able to survive inside amoebal cysts for longer periods (days to weeks), long-term intracystic survival assays were carried out (Fig. 1). Cocultures (combinations of amoebae with a specific bacterial strain) and amoeba and bacterial monoculture controls were set up as described above. Separate culture flasks were used for each excystment time point (described below). After 6 days of incubation in HS buffer at 25°C, cells were treated overnight at 25°C with 3% HCl (pH 0.2) to kill extracellular bacteria, trophozoites, and immature cysts. The efficiency of HCl at killing trophozoites was verified by light microscopy. Cells were then washed with PAS buffer and treated with gentamicin sulfate (100 μg/ml in HS buffer) for 2 h at 25°C to kill any remaining viable extracellular bacteria. Subsequently cysts were washed, resuspended in fresh HS buffer, and incubated at 25°C until the time point for induction of excystment. For the latter, at day 0 (i.e., immediately after the gentamicin treatment) and after 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, the cells were washed with PAS and then incubated at 25°C in nutrient-rich PYG medium as the excystment medium (26). During excystment, internalized bacteria are released into the medium, where they can further replicate. The process of excystment in both cocultures and amoebal controls and the presence of released bacteria in the coculture flasks and of viable bacteria in the bacterial control flasks were checked by light microscopy. Exact quantification of recovered bacteria was assessed by plating on MHA or PCA, as described previously. Enrichment cultures were set up to detect stressed bacteria and/or low bacterial concentrations (enrichment in TSB, ½ Fraser broth for L. monocytogenes, and MHB plus 5% [vol/vol] horse blood for C. jejuni, followed by plating on MHA or PCA). The identity of the recovered bacteria was confirmed by conventional biochemical testing (ISO6579-FDAmd1, ISO10273, ISO10272-1, ISO11290-1/A1, and ISO16654; www.iso.org).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Overview of the experimental setup of the intracystic survival assay.

TEM.To determine the presence and exact subcellular location of intracystic bacteria, mature cysts, obtained after HCl and gentamicin treatment (see above), were prepared for observation by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Chemical fixation was performed on collagen-coated inserts as described by Lambrecht et al. (38). Briefly, at d0 and on days 3 and 14, cysts were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were rinsed with sodium cacodylate buffer, postfixed with osmium tetroxide, dehydrated with ethanol, and embedded in Spurr's medium. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and studied with a Jeol JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 60 kV. Pictures were digitized using a Ditabis system (Pforzheim, Germany). Per image section, 30 cysts were studied to obtain an indication of the infection ratio (percentage of cysts with intracellular bacteria) and infection intensity (mean number of intracellular bacteria inside bacterium-harboring cysts). Identification of bacteria was based on size and the presence of a double surrounding membrane.

Data analysis.All experiments were repeated at least three times. Qualitative and quantitative data were recorded in an Excel spreadsheet, and statistical analysis was performed on the quantitative data using the software SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

For the invasion/uptake assays, a Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to detect differences in entry efficiency between and within species. For the latter, strains of the same bacterial species were clustered. For the encystment monitoring assays, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to (i) compare the percentages of cysts between cocultures and amoebal monocultures at each time point and (ii) to compare the absolute numbers of viable extracellular bacteria between cocultures and bacterial monocultures during encystment.

RESULTS

Foodborne pathogenic strains enter Acanthamoeba castellanii with different efficiencies.Invasion/uptake assays were performed to evaluate the bacterial invasion/uptake efficiencies by amoebal trophozoites before encystment. The results demonstrate that foodborne bacterial pathogens enter the Acanthamoeba trophozoite with various efficiencies (Fig. 2). No viable intraamoebal listeriae and campylobacters were recovered after 30 min of cocultivation in HS buffer at 25°C. The invasion/uptake efficiency of the other tested bacteria ranged from 0.0013% to 0.0306%. Significant differences in entry efficiency were observed between but not within species (P > 0.05). Escherichia coli (P = 0.002) and S. enterica (P = 0.002) exhibited significantly higher invasion/uptake by the amoebae than Y. enterocolitica. Indeed, after 30 min of cocultivation, the invasion/uptake index for both E. coli and S. enterica was ca. 1 intracellular bacterium/amoeba, whereas for the yersiniae, this value was only 0.05 intracellular bacterium/amoeba.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Entry efficiencies of different strains belonging to five foodborne bacterial pathogen species in A. castellanii trophozoites. Shown are the percentages of internalized viable, cultivable bacteria related to the initial inoculum after 30 min of cocultivation with A. castellanii in HS buffer at 25°C. Bars represent the mean ± standard error from four replicate experiments. *, no viable bacteria could be recovered (detection limit of 1 CFU/ml). inv., invasiveness towards Caco2 cells.

The presence of bacteria has no impact on amoebal encystment, except with Y. enterocolitica.Acanthamoeba is known to encyst in response to adverse environmental conditions, including food shortage. To assess if the presence of bacteria, being a potential food source for amoebae, affects the encystment process, encystment monitoring assays were performed. In general, encystment started within 24 h of incubation in HS buffer. After 2 days, ca. 54 to 93% of the trophozoites, in both cocultures and amoebal monoculture controls, had converted to immature cysts. After 6 days, all cysts were mature. With the exception of Y. enterocolitica strain 2/O:9 (Fig. 3), no significant differences between cyst percentages in cocultures and monoculture controls could be observed (P > 0.05). In the presence of Y. enterocolitica 2/O:9 (Fig. 3B), cyst percentages were significantly lower than in amoebal monocultures for all time points (P < 0.05). On day 6, only 71% ± 5% (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]) of the amoebae were encysted when cocultivated with Y. enterocolitica 2/O:9, in comparison to 95% ± 2.5% under the control condition (P = 0.028).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

(A) Encystment process of A. castellanii; (B) Yersinia enterocolitica strain 2/O:9 inhibits encystment of A. castellanii. (A) A. castellanii trophozoite (panel 1), immature cyst (panel 2), and mature cyst (panel 3). Note the presence of pseudopodia (p) and vacuoles (v) in panel A1 and the thick double-layered cell wall (c) in panel A3. (B) Percentages of A. castellanii trophozoites (gray) and (im)mature cysts (black) in the total amoebal count when cultivated in the presence (coculture) or absence (monoculture) of Y. enterocolitica at 25°C in HS buffer. Bars represent the mean ± standard error from four replicate experiments. *, significant difference (P < 0.05) between the means of coculture and the corresponding monoculture condition.

In general, the presence of encysting amoebae had no significant influence on the viability of the bacteria (P > 0.05) (data not shown). After 6 days of cultivation, the number of viable extra-amoebal bacteria in both cocultures and bacterial monocultures was still ca. 7 log CFU/ml, except for campylobacters. For the latter, no viable extra-amoebal bacteria could be recovered after 3 days in either cocultures or bacterial monocultures.

Intracystic survival of foodborne pathogens.The recovery of viable internalized foodborne pathogens from Acanthamoeba cysts after periods of days to weeks was species, strain, and time dependent (Fig. 4). In general, S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, Y. enterocolitica, and E. coli could be recovered after induction of excystment, indicating that they were able to survive inside A. castellanii cysts. In contrast, cultivable C. jejuni cells could never be retrieved after induction of excystment.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Survival (S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, Y. enterocolitica, and E. coli) or presence (C. jejuni) of foodborne pathogen strains inside A. castellanii cysts. Ten strains belonging to five foodborne pathogenic bacterial species were cocultivated with A. castellanii trophozoites (MOI of 1:100 in HS buffer at 25°C). After 6 days, cysts were treated with HCl and gentamicin and stored in HS buffer at 25°C (t = 0). To detect the intracellular survival of bacteria, excystment was induced at different time points (d0, d1, d3, d7, d14, and d21) by replacing HS buffer with nutrient-rich medium. Viability of bacteria was confirmed by colony counting. Bars represent the presence of viable, cultivable bacteria after excystment (n ≥ 3). For each species, two strains were tested, as indicated by the black and gray bars. *, presence of bacteria inside cysts (as determined by transmission electron microscopy), which were not cultivable after excystment.

Viable S. enterica and L. monocytogenes cells could be recovered from cysts after 21 days and 14 days (i.e., 27 and 20 days after the setup of the encystment treatment), respectively. In the bacterial monoculture controls, no bacteria were detected, confirming that the HCl and gentamicin treatments, together with the washing steps, were effective in removing bacteria. Moreover, in none of the cocultures could bacteria be recovered within 24 h after the replacement of the HS buffer with PYG medium, indicating that the bacteria were inside the cysts and not attached to the outer surface of the cyst wall. After 24 to 48 h in PYG medium, excystment occurred and trophozoites and (extracellular) bacteria were visible. After excystment, the extracellular S. enterica and L. monocytogenes cells grew rapidly, and after 3 days, concentrations of up to 9 log CFU/ml were reached. When the bacteria became too dense, the amoebae started to round up, lysed, or formed cysts again (data not shown).

Yersinia enterocolitica strains could be recovered from amoebal cysts at excystment time points d0, d1, and d3 by plating on PCA. At later excystment time points, no yersiniae could be detected.

Escherichia coli survived for only a limited time inside cysts. Strain O:26 could be recovered until d3, whereas strain O:157 could only be recovered at d0 (i.e., 6 days after the initial experimental setup). Three days after induction of excystment, viable extracellular E. coli O:26 and O:157 were observed, and from day 5 onwards, extracellular E. coli concentrations of 8 log CFU/ml were detected. The trophozoites began to lyse during the first day following excystment (data not shown). However, at later excystment time points (d7, d14, and d21), lysis of trophozoites decreased, amoebal trophozoites remained intact, and no viable E. coli cells could be recovered.

No viable, cultivable C. jejuni cells were recovered from A. castellanii cysts at any time point after induction of excystment, either by direct plating or by enrichment, although TEM images demonstrate the presence of intact intracystic bacteria at d0 and d3 (Fig. 5E).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

TEM micrographs of A. castellanii cysts with internalized bacteria (A to E) and an amoebal monoculture control (F). (A) S. enterica serovar Enteritidis at d0. (B) L. monocytogenes 1/2a at d14. (C) E. coli O:26 at d0. (D) Y. enterocolitica 2/O:9 at d0. (E) C. jejuni highly invasive toward Caco2-cells at d0. b, bacteria; ec, ectocyst; en, endocyst; EDG, electron-dense granule; n, condensed nucleus; v, vacuole.

The viability of extracellular C. jejuni already decreased during the encystment stage, as after 2 days of incubation in HS buffer, extracellular C. jejuni cells were coccoid and nonmotile in both cocultures and monocultures.

Foodborne pathogens localize inside the cyst cytosol.Transmission electron microscopy was performed to determine the exact intracystic location of the bacteria and to obtain an indication of the infection intensity and ratio. All tested foodborne bacterial pathogens were located in the amoebal cytosol and were not visibly surrounded by an amoebal vacuolar membrane (Fig. 5). At time point 0 h, the percentage of infected cysts (infection ratio) ranged from 17% to 53%, and the mean number of intact bacteria inside cysts (infection intensity) varied between 1.4 and 2.6 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Quantification of foodborne pathogenic bacteria inside A. castellanii cystsa

DISCUSSION

Our study proves that four of the most frequently reported foodborne bacterial pathogens (S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Y. enterocolitica) can survive encystment and excystment by the ubiquitous amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and can persist inside the cyst cytosol. While species-specific differences in trophozoite invasion/uptake efficiencies were observed, these could not be correlated with the pronounced differences in intracystic survival periods, ranging from d0 for E. coli O:157 up to d21 for both S. enterica strains. Moreover, intracystic bacteria were found to be protected against hostile environmental conditions, in this case antibiotic treatment (100 μg/ml gentamicin) and low pH (pH 0.2). For all tested species, including C. jejuni, the presence of intracystic bacteria was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. Up to 53% of the cysts contained foodborne pathogenic bacteria. After induction of excystment, S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Y. enterocolitica were released or triggered their release into the environment and were able to grow successfully. Bacterial release into the environment can occur through expulsion of bacterium-containing pellets or vesicles from intact amoebal cells or through amoebal lysis (3). The results of the present study could not provide a conclusive answer on the release mechanisms used by the tested bacteria. No culturable Campylobacter bacteria could be recovered from cysts after excystment. Hence the identity, viability, and culturability of the detected intracystic structures by TEM could not be confirmed. Our results thus show that protozoan cysts can provide internalized foodborne pathogenic bacteria with a shelter against adverse environmental conditions (21, 25). This sheltering could have significant repercussions on the ecology and epidemiology of foodborne pathogenic bacteria.

To our knowledge, no research has yet been performed to determine the survival capacities of Salmonella species in protozoan cysts. We show that S. enterica can survive for at least 3 weeks inside A. castellanii cysts, and preliminary results suggest that they might even survive for up to 3 months inside the cysts (data not shown). Viable L. monocytogenes cells could be recovered from cysts for up to 2 weeks. In an earlier study, no viable L. monocytogenes cells could be recovered from A. castellanii cysts after 34 days, suggesting that internalized bacteria, if present, may have died within that time frame (39). Moreover, survival inside cysts was shown to depend on the Listeria strain and Acanthamoeba species used (40). Previous experiments demonstrated survival of L. monocytogenes in cysts of Colpoda spp. (41) and Tetrahymena pyriformis (42). However, some are skeptical about the latter observation as Tetrahymena pyriformis is not known to form cysts (3).

Y. enterocolitica and E. coli only survived for up to 3 days inside A. castellanii cysts. As 2 days after inoculation 90% of the amoeba were already encysted, bacteria recovered at the arbitrary d0 time point (6 days after initial inoculation) were likely to have been encapsulated in the cysts for at least 5 days. No cultivable Y. enterocolitica and E. coli cells could be recovered from the cysts at time points later than d3. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed that there were no intact intracystic bacteria present at later time points. This indicates that Y. enterocolitica and E. coli invade or are taken up by amoebae (cf. confirmed by invasion/uptake assays) and survive for only a limited period of time inside amoebal cysts. Failure to persist for extended periods of time is probably due to intracystic nutrient depletion. The intracystic environment is not an optimal environment for bacteria as during cyst formation, excess food and water are expelled and the protozoon condenses (43). No data are yet available in the literature regarding intracystic survival of Y. enterocolitica. Matin and colleagues suggested that survival of certain invasive, non-foodborne E. coli strains inside Acanthamoeba cysts was possible up to 43 h cocultivation under encystment conditions (30). As long-term intracystic survival was not tested in this study and a different amoebal encystment method was used, their results cannot reliably be compared with ours.

In contrast to the other tested foodborne pathogens, viable and cultivable C. jejuni strains could not be recovered after excystment. A previous study also briefly reported that no C. jejuni cells could be observed in A. castellanii cysts (44). However, in TEM images in the present study, intracellular structures that look like bacteria with an intact cell membrane were visible in A. castellanii cysts. We hypothesize that these structures are bacteria are in a viable but not cultivable state and cannot be recovered after excystment by plating on MH agar plates or by enrichment in MH broth. Another explanation could be that the intracystic campylobacters do not survive the excystment process and are rapidly digested by the emerging amoebal trophozoites.

Determination of the exact intracystic location of bacteria was established by transmission electron microscopy. The TEM images of mature cysts at different excystment time points showed that all tested foodborne pathogenic strains were located inside the cyst cytosol. None of the investigated amoebal cross sections contained bacteria within the double cyst wall. Although these results are novel, bacterial entrapment in the cyst cytosol has already briefly been described before for Legionella pneumophila (25), Vibrio mimicus, and Simkania negevensis. The last two species could also be detected within the double cyst walls of Acanthamoeba polyphaga cysts (29, 32).

The species- and strain-specific differences in intracystic survival could not be related to bacterial invasion/uptake efficiency. Remarkably, no viable, cultivable L. monocytogenes or C. jejuni cells could be detected inside trophozoites after 30 min of cocultivation in HS buffer, although they could be detected inside cysts at different time points. The results of the invasion/uptake assays indicate that L. monocytogenes and C. jejuni prevent their uptake by the trophozoites or were not able to invade them within 30 min. Since later in the excystment process, viable intracystic bacteria were detected by either cultivation or TEM, it seems that those pathogens indeed need a longer invasion/uptake time. Contradictory information is published about the survival of Campylobacter and entry and survival mechanisms of Listeria in Acanthamoeba (for a complete overview, see reference 3). Differences can be attributed to variations in coculture assays (e.g., medium, temperature, and multiplicity of infection) and organisms (bacterial strains and protozoan species and strains) (3).

Initially, at least 17% up to 53% of the cysts were infected with foodborne pathogens, with the minimal estimated infection intensities ranging from 1.4 to 2.6 bacteria per infected amoeba. Moreover, after induction of excystment, all tested bacterial pathogens, with the exception of Campylobacter, were able to grow. Currently, the presence of free-living protozoa in food processing plants is not monitored as they are regarded as harmless. Our results, however, suggest that protozoan cysts could be a source of bacterial persistence in the environment and a route for host infection.

Previous studies have shown that bacteria in trophozoites (e.g., see references 45 and 46) and cysts (25) were better protected against biocides. This study confirms that in contrast with the free-living bacteria (cf. bacteria monoculture controls of the intracystic survival assays), encapsulation of foodborne bacteria inside protozoal cysts protects them against external stresses, including gentamicin treatment (100 μg/ml) and extreme low pH (pH 0.2, achieved by 3% HCl treatment). Protection of intracystic bacteria against gentamicin, a commonly used antibiotic in food animal production (47), has been reported previously and was attributed to the fact that the antibiotic could not pass the double cyst wall (32). The sheltering capacity of protozoan cysts therefore has important food safety and public health implications and could explain why pathogenic bacteria persist in food processing environments, despite thorough disinfection protocols and hygiene monitoring.

The results from the encystment monitoring assays demonstrate that the viability and the encystation process of the amoebae were not markedly affected by intracellular bacteria, except for strain Y. enterocolitica 2/O:9. For this strain, a significant delay in encystment was observed. This may be due to the fact that a portion of the bacterial population can be used as a food source, making the amoebae less prone to encyst. Another explanation could be that the encystment delay is a result of direct contact between amoebae and bacteria or is mediated by secreted factors. The influence of secreted factors on amoebal encystment has been demonstrated before, as a previous study reported that Francisella tularensis caused rapid amoebal encystment by factors secreted by amoebae and/or F. tularensis (26). It is also demonstrated that certain endosymbionts can prevent cyst formation of Acanthamoeba and Hartmanella (48).

In conclusion, we here show that the most common and widespread foodborne pathogenic bacteria can survive in the cytosol of free-living protozoan cysts for extended periods of time. Intracystic survival is associated with increased resistance to adverse environmental conditions (including antibiotics and low pH). Pathogenic bacteria may therefore also use cysts as a vector to colonize new habitats or to infect animal hosts and humans. Moreover, bacteria inside cysts are likely to be undetected by the standardized cultivation protocols for the detection of pathogenic bacteria in food-related environments. Further research is necessary to identify the factors and conditions that may prevent uptake of foodborne pathogens by free-living protozoa and subsequent protozoan encystation in order to decrease bacterial survival and persistence in food-related environments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to M. Claeys for the excellent technical assistance with transmission electron microscopy. We also are very grateful to I. Van Damme for help with the statistical analysis.

This work was supported by grant 01D07612 from the Special Research Fund of Ghent University (BOF, Ghent, Belgium).

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 March 2015.
    • Accepted 4 June 2015.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 12 June 2015.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Scharff RL
    . 2012. Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States. J Food Prot 75:123–131. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-058.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Matz C,
    2. Kjelleberg S
    . 2005. Off the hook: how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol 13:302–307. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vaerewijck M,
    2. Baré J,
    3. Lambrecht E,
    4. Sabbe K,
    5. Houf K
    . 2014. Interactions of foodborne pathogens with free-living protozoa: potential consequences for food safety. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 13:924–944. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12100.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hausmann K,
    2. Hülsmann N,
    3. Radek R
    . 2003. Protistology. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Anacarso I,
    2. de Niederhausern S,
    3. Messi P,
    4. Guerrieri E,
    5. Iseppi R,
    6. Sabia C,
    7. Bondi M
    . 2011. Acanthamoeba polyphaga, a potential environmental vector for the transmission of food-borne and opportunistic pathogens. J Basic Microbiol 52:262–268.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Greub G,
    2. Raoult D
    . 2004. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:413–433. doi:10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Miltner EC,
    2. Bermudez LE
    . 2000. Mycobacterium avium grown in Acanthamoeba castellanii is protected from the effects of antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1990–1994. doi:10.1128/AAC.44.7.1990-1994.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jules M,
    2. Buchrieser C
    . 2007. Legionella pneumophila adaptation to intracellular life and the host response: clues from genomics and transcriptomics. FEBS Lett 581:2829–2838. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Baré J,
    2. Sabbe K,
    3. Huws S,
    4. Vercauteren D,
    5. Braeckmans K,
    6. van Gremberghe I,
    7. Favoreel H,
    8. Houf K
    . 2010. Influence of temperature, oxygen and bacterial strain identity on the association of Campylobacter jejuni with Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:371–381. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00955.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lambrecht E,
    2. Baré J,
    3. Van Damme I,
    4. Bert W,
    5. Sabbe K,
    6. Houf K
    . 2013. Behavior of Yersinia enterocolitica in the presence of the bacterivorous Acanthamoeba castellanii. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6407–6413. doi:10.1128/AEM.01915-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Baré J,
    2. Sabbe K,
    3. Van Wichelen J,
    4. van Gremberghe I,
    5. D'Hondt S,
    6. Houf K
    . 2009. Diversity and habitat specificity of free-living protozoa in commercial poultry houses. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1417–1426. doi:10.1128/AEM.02346-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Baré J,
    2. Houf K,
    3. Verstraete T,
    4. Vaerewijck M,
    5. Sabbe K
    . 2011. Persistence of free-living protozoan communities across rearing cycles in commercial poultry houses. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1763–1769. doi:10.1128/AEM.01756-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Snelling WJ,
    2. McKenna JP,
    3. Lecky DM,
    4. Dooley JS
    . 2005. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in waterborne protozoa. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5560–5571. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.9.5560-5571.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Vaerewijck MJ,
    2. Sabbe K,
    3. Baré J,
    4. Houf K
    . 2008. Microscopic and molecular studies of the diversity of free-living protozoa in meat-cutting plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5741–5749. doi:10.1128/AEM.00980-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Vaerewijck MJ,
    2. Sabbe K,
    3. Van Hende J,
    4. Bare J,
    5. Houf K
    . 2010. Sampling strategy, occurrence and diversity of free-living protozoa in domestic refrigerators. J Appl Microbiol 109:1566–1578. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04783.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Vaerewijck MJ,
    2. Sabbe K,
    3. Baré J,
    4. Houf K
    . 2011. Occurrence and diversity of free-living protozoa on butterhead lettuce. Int J Food Microbiol 147:105–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gourabathini P,
    2. Brandl MT,
    3. Redding KS,
    4. Gunderson JH,
    5. Berk SG
    . 2008. Interactions between food-borne pathogens and protozoa isolated from lettuce and spinach. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2518–2525. doi:10.1128/AEM.02709-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Khan NA
    . 2006. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30:564–595. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00023.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Adekambi T,
    2. Ben Salah S,
    3. Khlif M,
    4. Raoult D,
    5. Drancourt M
    . 2006. Survival of environmental mycobacteria in Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5974–5981. doi:10.1128/AEM.03075-05.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Aksozek A,
    2. McClellan K,
    3. Howard K,
    4. Niederkorn JY,
    5. Alizadeh H
    . 2002. Resistance of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts to physical, chemical, and radiological conditions. J Parasitol 88:621–623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Coulon C,
    2. Collignon A,
    3. McDonnell G,
    4. Thomas V
    . 2010. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection treatments used in health care settings. J Clin Microbiol 48:2689–2697. doi:10.1128/JCM.00309-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Thomas V,
    2. McDonnell G,
    3. Denyer SP,
    4. Maillard JY
    . 2010. Free-living amoebae and their intracellular pathogenic microorganisms: risks for water quality. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:231–259. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00190.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dupuy M,
    2. Berne F,
    3. Herbelin P,
    4. Binet M,
    5. Berthelot N,
    6. Rodier MH,
    7. Soreau S,
    8. Hechard Y
    . 2014. Sensitivity of free-living amoeba trophozoites and cysts to water disinfectants. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217:335–339. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.07.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sriram R,
    2. Shoff M,
    3. Booton G,
    4. Fuerst P,
    5. Visvesvara GS
    . 2008. Survival of Acanthamoeba cysts after desiccation for more than 20 years. J Clin Microbiol 46:4045–4048. doi:10.1128/JCM.01903-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kilvington S,
    2. Price J
    . 1990. Survival of Legionella pneumophila within cysts of Acanthamoeba polyphaga following chlorine exposure. J Appl Bacteriol 68:519–525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02904.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. El-Etr SH,
    2. Margolis JJ,
    3. Monack D,
    4. Robison RA,
    5. Cohen M,
    6. Moore E,
    7. Rasley A
    . 2009. Francisella tularensis type A strains cause the rapid encystment of Acanthamoeba castellanii and survive in amoebal cysts for three weeks postinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7488–7500. doi:10.1128/AEM.01829-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    EFSA. 2013. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2011. EFSA J 11:3129–3379.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ben Salah I,
    2. Drancourt M
    . 2010. Surviving within the amoebal exocyst: the Mycobacterium avium complex paradigm. BMC Microbiol 10:99. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Kahane S,
    2. Dvoskin B,
    3. Mathias M,
    4. Friedman MG
    . 2001. Infection of Acanthamoeba polyphaga with Simkania negevensis and S. negevensis survival within amoebal cysts. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4789–4795. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.10.4789-4795.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Matin A,
    2. Jung SY
    . 2011. Interaction of Escherichia coli K1 and K5 with Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites and cysts. Korean J Parasitol 49:349–356. doi:10.3347/kjp.2011.49.4.349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Walochnik J,
    2. Picher O,
    3. Aspock C,
    4. Ullmann M,
    5. Sommer R,
    6. Aspock H
    . 1998. Interactions of “Limax amoebae” and Gram-negative bacteria: experimental studies and review of current problems. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 23:273–278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Abd H,
    2. Valeru SP,
    3. Sami SM,
    4. Saeed A,
    5. Raychaudhuri S,
    6. Sandstrom G
    . 2010. Interaction between Vibrio mimicus and Acanthamoeba castellanii. Environ Microbiol Rep 2:166–171. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00129.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yousuf FA,
    2. Siddiqui R,
    3. Khan NA
    . 2013. Acanthamoeba castellanii of the T4 genotype is a potential environmental host for Enterobacter aerogenes and Aeromonas hydrophila. Parasit Vectors 6:169. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-1186-1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Horn M,
    2. Fritsche TR,
    3. Gautom RK,
    4. Schleifer KH,
    5. Wagner M
    . 1999. Novel bacterial endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. related to the Paramecium caudatum symbiont Caedibacter caryophilus. Environ Microbiol 1:357–367. doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00045.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Collingro A,
    2. Toenshoff ER,
    3. Taylor MW,
    4. Fritsche TR,
    5. Wagner M,
    6. Horn M
    . 2005. ‘Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila,’ an endosymbiont of Acanthamoeba spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1863–1866. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63572-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cirillo JD,
    2. Falkow S,
    3. Tompkins LS
    . 1994. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii enhances invasion. Infect Immun 62:3254–3261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Steinert M,
    2. Birkness K,
    3. White E,
    4. Fields B,
    5. Quinn F
    . 1998. Mycobacterium avium bacilli grow saprozoically in coculture with Acanthamoeba polyphaga and survive within cyst walls. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2256–2261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Lambrecht E,
    2. Baré J,
    3. Claeys M,
    4. Chavatte N,
    5. Bert W,
    6. Sabbe K,
    7. Houf K
    . 2015. Transmission electron microscopy sample preparation protocols for ultrastructural study of cysts of free-living protozoa. Biotechniques 58:181–188. doi:10.2144/000114274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ly TMC,
    2. Muller HE
    . 1990. Ingested Listeria monocytogenes survive and multiply in protozoa. J Med Microbiol 33:51–54. doi:10.1099/00222615-33-1-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nale Y
    . 2011. Role of Acanthamoeba spp. in the environmental survival of Listeria monocytogenes. Ph.D. thesis. University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  41. 41.↵
    1. Nadhanan R
    . 2012. Cell biology of the interaction between Listeria monocytogenes and Colpoda spp. Ph.D. thesis. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Pushkareva VI,
    2. Ermolaeva SA
    . 2010. Listeria monocytogenes virulence factor listeriolysin O favors bacterial growth in co-culture with the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis, causes protozoan encystment and promotes bacterial survival inside cysts. BMC Microbiol 10:26. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Khan N
    . 2009. Acanthamoeba: biology and pathogenesis. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bui XT,
    2. Winding A,
    3. Qvortrup K,
    4. Wolff A,
    5. Bang DD,
    6. Creuzenet C
    . 2012. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in co-culture with Acanthamoeba castellanii: role of amoeba-mediated depletion of dissolved oxygen. Environ Microbiol 14:2034–2047. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02655.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. King CH,
    2. Shotts EB, Jr,
    3. Wooley RE,
    4. Porter KG
    . 1988. Survival of coliforms and bacterial pathogens within protozoa during chlorination. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:3023–3033.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Whan L,
    2. Grant IR,
    3. Rowe MT
    . 2006. Interaction between Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis and environmental protozoa. BMC Microbiol 6:63. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-6-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Luangtongkum T,
    2. Morishita TY,
    3. Ison AJ,
    4. Huang SX,
    5. McDermott PF,
    6. Zhang QJ
    . 2006. Effect of conventional and organic production practices on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. in poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3600–3607. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.5.3600-3607.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Horn M,
    2. Wagner M,
    3. Muller KD,
    4. Schmid EN,
    5. Fritsche TR,
    6. Schleifer KH,
    7. Michel R
    . 2000. Neochlamydia hartmannellae gen. nov., sp. nov. (Parachlamydiaceae), an endoparasite of the amoeba Hartmannella vermiformis. Microbiology 146:1231–1239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Protozoan Cysts Act as a Survival Niche and Protective Shelter for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria
Ellen Lambrecht, Julie Baré, Natascha Chavatte, Wim Bert, Koen Sabbe, Kurt Houf
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2015, 81 (16) 5604-5612; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01031-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protozoan Cysts Act as a Survival Niche and Protective Shelter for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Share
Protozoan Cysts Act as a Survival Niche and Protective Shelter for Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria
Ellen Lambrecht, Julie Baré, Natascha Chavatte, Wim Bert, Koen Sabbe, Kurt Houf
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2015, 81 (16) 5604-5612; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01031-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336