Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Genetics and Molecular Biology

Use of an Endogenous Plasmid Locus for Stable in trans Complementation in Borrelia burgdorferi

Irene N. Kasumba, Aaron Bestor, Kit Tilly, Patricia A. Rosa
H. Nojiri, Editor
Irene N. Kasumba
Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron Bestor
Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kit Tilly
Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia A. Rosa
Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Nojiri
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03657-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Targeted mutagenesis and complementation are important tools for studying genes of unknown function in the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. A standard method of complementation is reintroduction of a wild-type copy of the targeted gene on a shuttle vector. However, shuttle vectors are present at higher copy numbers than B. burgdorferi plasmids and are potentially unstable in the absence of selection, thereby complicating analyses in the mouse-tick infectious cycle. B. burgdorferi has over 20 plasmids, with some, such as linear plasmid 25 (lp25), carrying genes required by the spirochete in vivo but relatively unstable during in vitro cultivation. We propose that complementation on an endogenous plasmid such as lp25 would overcome the copy number and in vivo stability issues of shuttle vectors. In addition, insertion of a selectable marker on lp25 could ensure its stable maintenance by spirochetes in culture. Here, we describe the construction of a multipurpose allelic-exchange vector containing a multiple-cloning site and either of two selectable markers. This suicide vector directs insertion of the complementing gene into the bbe02 locus, a site on lp25 that was previously shown to be nonessential during both in vitro and in vivo growth. We demonstrate the functional utility of this strategy by restoring infectivity to an ospC mutant through complementation at this site on lp25 and stable maintenance of the ospC gene throughout mouse infection. We conclude that this represents a convenient and widely applicable method for stable gene complementation in B. burgdorferi.

INTRODUCTION

Lyme borreliosis is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, which is transmitted through the bite of an infected Ixodes tick (1), and remains the most prevalent vector-borne illness in North America. No Lyme disease vaccine is currently available for humans. However, genetic tools have been developed (2–11) to investigate molecular factors crucial for B. burgdorferi biological processes, such as gene regulation and host infectivity (12–24). The B. burgdorferi genome contains a linear chromosome and over 20 linear and circular plasmids (25, 26), some of which carry essential genes (13–18). More than half of all plasmid-borne genes have no homologs outside Borrelia (25), and many of the predicted open reading frames on the chromosome encode novel proteins (26). Therefore, the functions of a large set of genes in the B. burgdorferi genome remain to be determined.

Studies aimed at investigating gene function typically include inactivation of the gene of interest, assessment of phenotypic changes, and complementation of the mutation to determine if the wild-type (WT) phenotype is restored (27). Two methods are widely used for complementation in B. burgdorferi. The first is reintroduction of a wild-type copy of the mutated gene into the B. burgdorferi genome, either in trans at a chromosomal locus (22, 28) or in cis, adjacent to the original locus (9, 14, 29, 30). Complementation in cis should restore gene expression to a level comparable to that of the wild type, but potential complications include the impact on cotranscribed or closely clustered genes (27).

The second method involves the use of autonomously replicating shuttle vectors for in trans gene complementation (3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 31). Complications may arise with the use of shuttle vectors, however, including the effect of the vector copy number on the expression level of the gene being complemented (19, 31), the need to methylate shuttle vector DNA for successful transformation of wild-type strains (32, 33), and the possible loss of the shuttle vector carrying the complementing gene during the in vivo infectious cycle (19).

An improved strategy for stable complementation of genes on an essential plasmid of B. burgdorferi, such as lp25, has been suggested (27), but no studies to date have explored this method. Therefore, we examined the use of the bbe02 locus on lp25 as a target site for gene complementation through allelic exchange. The bbe02 locus encodes one of the restriction-modification enzymes that significantly inhibits shuttle vector transformation of wild-type B. burgdorferi (34, 35). Inactivation of bbe02 did not have an adverse effect on surrounding genes or cause any attenuation of B. burgdorferi in vivo (34, 36).

Here, we describe the construction of a multipurpose allelic-exchange vector (AEV) that contains the bbe02 flanking sequences linked to a multiple-cloning site (MCS) and either of two selectable markers. We determined that complementation of an ospC mutant with this AEV restored inducible OspC production and spirochete infectivity in a mouse model. Furthermore, we determined that lp25 and the ospC gene it carried were stably retained by B. burgdorferi during persistent mouse infection. These studies demonstrate the utility of targeting an endogenous plasmid for stable in trans gene complementation and present an additional tool for genetic studies of B. burgdorferi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

B. burgdorferi strain and culture.The low-passage-number infectious clone B31-A3 of the type strain B31 (ATCC 35210) was used as the WT strain (37). The B31-A3 derivatives ospCK1, lacking the ospC gene, and ospCK1/pBSV2G-ospC, harboring ospC on a shuttle vector (19), were used as the ospC mutant and complemented strains, respectively. Bacteria were propagated from frozen stocks in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II (BSK II) medium, pH 7.7, containing gelatin and 6% rabbit serum. Colonies were isolated in solid BSK medium incubated at 35°C with 2.5% CO2, as described previously (38). Antibiotic-resistant spirochetes were propagated in medium containing 200 μg/ml kanamycin, 40 μg/ml gentamicin, or 50 μg/ml streptomycin. To induce ospC expression by growth at lower pH (39), cultures were inoculated in BSK II medium, pH 7, at 105 spirochetes per ml and harvested when they reached late log phase (∼108 spirochetes/ml). Aliquots of each culture were processed for subsequent analysis of DNA, RNA, and protein contents.

Escherichia coli strains and culture.All plasmid constructs were propagated in either NEB 5α (New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA) or Top10 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) cells. E. coli cultures were incubated at 37°C in LB broth/agar containing 5 μg/ml gentamicin, 50 μg/ml kanamycin, or 100 μg/ml spectinomycin as needed.

Construction of a multiple-cloning site and antibiotic resistance cassette.Two different antibiotic resistance genes, driven by either the flaBp or flgBp flagellar-gene promoter and flanked upstream by an MCS, were amplified by PCR and cloned into the pCR 2.1 TOPO vector (Life Technologies). Primers designed to amplify the promoters linked to the antibiotic resistance gene sequences contained 5 unique restriction enzyme sites added to the 5′ end of the forward primer to create the MCS. A PacI restriction enzyme site was added to the 3′ end of each reverse primer for the selectable marker. The flaBp-aadA cassette was PCR amplified from the pBBE02-Spec plasmid (33) using primers 1 and 2 (all the primers are listed in Table 1), and the flgBp-aphI cassette was amplified from the pBSV2 plasmid (11) using primers 3 and 4. The resulting PCR products, with 5′ NheI and 3′ PacI sites flanking the MCS-antibiotic resistance cassette, were cloned into the pCR2.1 TOPO vector (Life Technologies) to generate the pCR2.1-flaBp-aadA and pCR2.1-flgBp-aphI plasmids, conferring resistance to spectinomycin/streptomycin and kanamycin, respectively. The aadA gene confers resistance to both spectinomycin and streptomycin; the antibiotic used for selection (spectinomycin in E. coli and streptomycin in Borrelia) was chosen based on the relative level of background resistance. The fidelities of all plasmids and constructs generated in this study were confirmed by PCR, sequence analyses (primers 9 to 20 [Table 1]), and restriction enzyme digestion.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Primers used in this study

Construction of allelic-exchange vectors.A multipurpose AEV targeting the bbe02 locus on lp25 was constructed in the pOK12 cloning vector (40) using previously characterized restriction sites in bbe02 for insertion of an antibiotic resistance cassette (34). A 2,596-bp internal fragment of the bbe02 gene on lp25 was amplified from WT B. burgdorferi genomic DNA, using primers 5 and 6, and cloned into the pCR2.1 TOPO vector (Life Technologies). This fragment was excised from the TOPO vector with flanking sites XhoI/NotI and cloned into the same sites in the pOK12 vector (40), creating the pOK-bbe02 plasmid. The pOK-bbe02 plasmid was digested with NheI/PacI (internal sites in bbe02) to delete a 1,254-bp internal fragment of the bbe02 gene and ligated with similarly digested fragments encompassing the MCS linked to the antibiotic resistance cassettes in pCR2.1 plasmids (see above). The resulting AEVs, designated pKBE-Strep and pKBE-Kan, confer resistance to spectinomycin/streptomycin and kanamycin, respectively. Two tandem Rho-independent transcriptional terminator sequences of the bmpB locus of B. burgdorferi (41, 42) were inserted using primers 7 and 8 (Table 1), as previously described (41), and cloned into the NheI/KpnI sites of the MCS of each AEV. An ApaI site was added at the 3′ end of the transcriptional terminator as an additional site in the MCS.

Construction of an AEV harboring wild-type ospC.A 1,015-bp fragment encompassing the WT ospC gene and its native promoter was cloned into the KpnI/BamHI sites of the MCS region of pKBE-Strep, creating pKBE-Strep/ospC+.

Transformation of B. burgdorferi with the AEV.Low-passage-number WT and ospCK1 strains were propagated from frozen stocks and used to prepare competent cells for transformation with the AEV, following established methodology (43, 44). Recombination between the AEV and the bbe02 locus of transformants was selected by growth under antibiotic selection and confirmed by PCR analysis (primers 9 to 14 and 17 to 20 [Table 1]). Transformant clones were assessed for full B. burgdorferi plasmid complement, as described previously (45). The pKBE-Strep/ospC+ AEV was transformed into the ospCK1 strain by electroporation, and colonies were screened for ospC by PCR (primers 13 and 14 [Table 1]). A positive transformant, ospCK1/ospC+, which was verified to carry the ospC gene at the bbe02 locus on lp25 (primers 15 and 16 [Table 1]) and contained the same plasmid profile as the parental strain, ospCK1, and the WT clone B31-A3 (lacking only circular plasmid 9 [cp9]), was used in further experiments.

Southern blotting.The presence of a wild-type ospC gene on lp25 of the ospCK1/ospC+ complemented strain was confirmed by Southern blotting. Approximately 0.15 μg of total genomic DNAs from WT, ospCK1, and ospCK1/ospC+ cultures was separated on a 0.5% agarose gel under field inversion electrophoresis conditions and subjected to Southern blot analysis, as previously described (46). Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probes (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) were amplified from WT genomic DNA using gene-specific primers for the ospC and pncA genes (primers 13 and 14 and primers 21 and 22 [Table 1]) following the manufacturer's instructions and then sequentially hybridized with the blot as described previously (11).

Transcript level determination by quantitative RT-PCR.Total RNA was prepared from late-log-phase cultures of each strain cultivated in triplicate at pH 7.0 or 7.7, using the TRIzol reagent method and the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies). One microgram of total RNA was subjected to DNase treatment as outlined in the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies) and used to synthesize cDNA using the High Capacity DNA Reverse Transcriptase (RT) kit (Life Technologies). A control reaction mixture lacking reverse transcriptase (no RT) was included for each cDNA synthesis reaction, and each sample was tested with three technical replicates by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using a 1:10 dilution of cDNA, the TaqMan Universal PCR Mastermix (Life Technologies), and ABI Viia7 software, as previously described (47). The constitutively expressed flaB gene was used as the PCR endogenous control to which ospC and pncA values were normalized. A standard curve using crude DNA samples prepared by the boiling method described below was run for each PCR primer-probe set (the primer sequences are listed in Table 1).

DNA copy number determination by quantitative PCR.In order to minimize variability in the purification of genomic DNA molecules with different structures and sizes, we used a simple but crude method of sample preparation to assess the gene copy number, as follows. A 0.3-ml sample of each late-log-phase culture, for which the spirochete density was determined by counting, was centrifuged at 9,000 rpm for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in RNase/DNase-free water at a final concentration of 105 spirochetes/μl and boiled for 5 min. qPCR assays were run with 2 μl of each crude DNA sample diluted 1:10 or 1:30 and the TaqMan chemistry, as detailed previously (47). The chromosomal flaB gene was used as the endogenous control to which ospC and pncA values were normalized. The quantitative-PCR results for standard curves generated with crude DNA preparations from a defined number of organisms were identical to those generated with purified total genomic DNA (Qiagen) representing a defined number of genome equivalents as calculated from the DNA concentration and B. burgdorferi genome size.

Statistical analysis.The differences in gene copy numbers and transcript levels between B. burgdorferi strains and culture conditions were assessed using Graph Pad Prism software and a two-tailed, unpaired Student's t test, with a P value of <0.01 as the cutoff for significant differences between groups.

OspC and FlaB protein analysis.Spirochetes from the same log-phase cultures used for DNA and RNA analysis were enumerated with a Petroff-Hausser chamber, washed twice with HN buffer (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM NaCl; pH 7.6), and resuspended in sample buffer at a final concentration of 109 spirochetes/ml. Total cell lysates of each strain representing approximately 107 spirochetes were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and analyzed with OspC polyclonal and FlaB (flagellin) monoclonal antibodies, as described previously (47, 48).

Mouse infection.Animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines from the National Institutes of Health, with protocols approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML) Animal Care and Use Committee. The Rocky Mountain Laboratories are accredited by the International Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). The B. burgdorferi WT, ospCK1, and ospCK1/ospC+ strains were grown to mid-log phase, and 1 × 104 bacteria were inoculated (8 × 103 intraperitoneally and 2 × 103 subcutaneously) per 6- to 8-week-old RML mouse. At 3 weeks postinoculation, the mice were retro-orbitally bled, and the reactivity of mouse sera against whole-cell B. burgdorferi was assessed by immunoblotting using a slot blot apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and mouse sera diluted 1:200, as described previously (48). At 7 to 8 weeks postinoculation, the mice were euthanized, and the ear, bladder, and joint tissues were incubated in BSK II medium at 35°C for spirochete isolation. Spirochetes isolated from the ears and bladders of mice inoculated with the ospCK1/ospC+ strain were further propagated in liquid culture with and without streptomycin to assess retention of the ospC gene on lp25.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Engineering allelic-exchange constructs.Shuttle vectors suitable for complementation of mutants in B. burgdorferi are available, but they have a higher copy number than endogenous plasmids and can be lost in the absence of selection, such as during in vivo infection (19). To circumvent these shortcomings, we examined the use of the nonessential bbe02 locus on the in vivo essential lp25 for complementation in B. burgdorferi. We constructed a multipurpose AEV containing a multiple-cloning site and either of two different antibiotic resistance cassettes to generate the pKBE-Strep and pKBE-Kan plasmids, conferring streptomycin and kanamycin resistance, respectively (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Plasmids and B. burgdorferi strains used in this study

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Schematic representation of the multipurpose AEVs. A PCR fragment encompassing part of the bbe02 gene (nucleotides 3927 to 1331 of lp25 [gray]) was cloned into pOK12. An MCS and either of two different antibiotic resistance cassettes were inserted between the NheI and PacI sites at nucleotides 3333 and 2079, respectively, of lp25, as described previously (33, 34). The resulting plasmids, pKBE-Strep and pKBE-Kan, confer resistance to the antibiotics spectinomycin/streptomycin and kanamycin, respectively, on both E. coli and B. burgdorferi. The Kanr gene on the pOK12 backbone confers kanamycin resistance only in E. coli. The circle labeled P15A indicates the origin of plasmid replication in E. coli. Tandem transcriptional terminators (TT) (black) were added to prevent read-through from the bbe02 promoter when inserted into lp25. The diagram is not drawn to scale.

To test recombination of the AEV constructs with the bbe02 locus on lp25, we transformed the plasmids into WT B. burgdorferi by electroporation. Positive transformants confirmed by PCR (primers 9 and 10 and primers 11 and 12 [Table 1]), designated A3 Δbbe02-Strepr and A3 Δbbe02-Kanr strains (Table 2), were obtained from the pKBE-Strep and pKBE-Kan transformations, respectively. The A3 Δbbe02-Strepr and A3 Δbbe02-Kanr strains were shown to have the same plasmid content as B31-A3, lacking only cp9 (25).

Complementation of an ospC mutant at the bbe02 locus.To confirm the utility of the AEV for gene complementation in B. burgdorferi, a wild-type copy of ospC was cloned into pKBE-Strep. The resulting plasmid, pKBE-Strep/ospC+, was electroporated into the ospCK1 mutant strain to generate the ospCK1/ospC+ strain. We verified insertion of the wild-type ospC gene into the bbe02 locus on lp25 by PCR with primers listed in Table 1 (Fig. 2A, black arrowheads, and B) and Southern blot analysis (Fig. 3).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Deletion in bbe02 and insertion of ospC on lp25 in the ospCK1/ospC+ strain. (A) Genome organization of the bbe02 locus on lp25 in the WT and ospCK1 strains (i), with the region deleted (shown in black) and replaced with the ospC construct, an MCS (dark gray), and transcriptional terminators (TT) and a flaBp-aadA selectable marker in the ospCK1/ospC+ complemented strain (ii). The flaB and ospC promoters are represented by divergent arrows, and the positions of the oligonucleotide primers used in panel B are indicated by arrowheads. (Not drawn to scale.) (B) Deletion in bbe02 and insertion of the ospC complementation construct as confirmed by PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR primers used are identified by the numbers above the bracketed lanes and correspond to those shown in panel A and Table 1. The mobilities of the DNA size standards are shown on the left. WT, wild-type strain B31-A3; NTC, no-template control.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Southern blot analysis of B. burgdorferi transformants. Equivalent amounts of genomic DNA from the WT, ospCK1 (ospC mutant), and ospCK1/ospC+ (mutant complemented with ospC on lp25) strains were separated by field inversion gel electrophoresis, blotted, and hybridized with ospC and pncA probes, as indicated. The mobilities of the DNA size standards are shown on the left.

The streptomycin resistance cassette was amplified from only the ospCK1/ospC+ complemented strain, as expected (Fig. 2B, primers 9 and 10). The ospC gene was detectable only in the WT and ospCK1/ospC+ strains (primers 13 and 14), whereas the bbe02 region was present in the WT and ospCK1 strains but deleted in the ospCK1/ospC+ strain (primers 17 and 18). Finally, a PCR fragment connecting the ospC and bbe03 genes was obtained only when DNA was prepared from the complemented strain, but not from the WT or ospCK1 strain (primers 13 and 20), indicating allelic exchange with bbe02 on lp25. The ospC insertion in the complemented strain is expected to have no adverse effect on flanking genes, since insertion at this site was previously shown to have no impact on B. burgdorferi growth and mammalian infection (34). These results demonstrate that the DNA construct containing ospC recombined at the bbe02 locus of lp25 through a double-crossover event.

Southern blot analysis under field inversion electrophoresis conditions further confirmed insertion of the complementing ospC gene on lp25 (Fig. 3). In wild-type B. burgdorferi, ospC is located on cp26, and the pncA (bbe22) gene encoding nicotinamidase is located on lp25 (25, 26). As expected, the ospC probe hybridized to genomic DNA from the WT and ospCK1/ospC+ clones, but not to DNA from the ospCK1 clone (Fig. 3, left). Additionally, the ospC probe hybridized to different plasmids in the WT and ospCK1/ospC+ strains, representing forms of cp26 and lp25, respectively. Conversely, the pncA probe hybridized to bands of the same size in the WT and ospCK1 clones but to a larger DNA element in the ospCK1/ospC+ clone, due to insertion of the 1,350-bp sequence of the ospC complementation construct into lp25 (Fig. 3, right). Hence, the results from Southern blot analysis are in agreement with the PCR analysis and show that the complementing ospC gene was inserted on lp25 in the ospCK1/ospC+ strain.

Relative copy numbers and expression of the ospC gene at different genomic sites.Complementation in trans on a shuttle vector or elsewhere in the genome can alter the copy number and impact expression of the reintroduced gene relative to its native locus. Borrelia has both linear and circular replicons, and the form of the DNA on which a gene is located may also influence its expression. To address these potential concerns, we determined and compared basal and induced expression of the ospC gene from its native locus on the circular plasmid cp26 to that of the ospC gene introduced by allelic exchange on the linear plasmid lp25 or carried by the shuttle vector pBSV2G (19). We also assessed expression of pncA (bbe22) to determine if insertion of the ospC gene or a selectable marker on lp25 altered the expression of another gene on the plasmid. To do this, total RNA was prepared from WT, ospC mutant, and complemented strains grown in standard culture medium (pH 7.7) or at a lower pH (pH 7.0), which induces expression of ospC and other RpoS-dependent genes (29, 39, 47). The relative abundances of the ospC and pncA gene transcripts were determined by quantitative RT-PCR and normalized to that of the constitutively expressed chromosomal flaB gene. Likewise, the ospC, pncA, and flaB gene targets were compared by quantitative PCR to determine the copy numbers of cp26, lp25, and shuttle vector plasmids relative to the chromosome. Finally, the protein profiles of these strains were compared by immunoblot analysis of cell lysates using antibodies specific for OspC and flagellin (FlaB). These data are presented together in Fig. 4 to permit direct comparison of the copy numbers and expression of the ospC gene at the different genomic locations in these strains.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Relative expression and copy numbers of the ospC gene when carried by different replicons. Five different B. burgdorferi strains (identified in the key at the lower right) were grown in triplicate to late log phase under uninduced (pH 7.7) and ospC-induced (pH 7.0) culture conditions (39). Aliquots of each culture were processed for subsequent analysis of RNA, DNA, and protein. The replicon on which the ospC gene is located differs among the strains, as indicated in the key; the pncA (BBE22) gene is present on lp25 in all strains. (A and B) The transcript levels (A) and copy numbers (B) of the ospC and pncA genes relative to the chromosomally located and constitutively expressed flaB gene were determined by quantitative PCR from three independent biological replicates, with three technical replicates of each sample. (A) The gene transcript values represent the means plus standard deviations of all determinations for each strain under the indicated growth conditions (n = 9). (B) The gene copy numbers shown represent the means plus standard deviations of combined determinations for each strain under both growth conditions (n = 18). The asterisks denote a significant difference (P < 0.01, as determined by a two-tailed, unpaired Student t test) between the indicated strain and all other strains in the analysis; differences between unmarked strains were not significant. (C) The OspC and FlaB (flagellin) protein profiles of all strains were assessed by immunoblot analysis of whole-cell lysates with specific antisera; the results shown are representative examples of each strain grown under inducing conditions. OspC was not detected in any strains grown under noninducing conditions (not shown).

The ospC mutant strains complemented with ospC on lp25 or the shuttle vector exhibited patterns of basal and induced ospC transcription similar to those of the WT strain, but the absolute level of ospC transcript varied with the genomic location (Fig. 4A). There was approximately twice as much transcript from the ospC gene on the shuttle vector as from the native gene on cp26 and ∼10-fold more than from the copy on lp25 (Fig. 4A, left). This correlated with the relative proportion of ospC (plasmid) to flaB (chromosome) gene copies when ospC was present on pBSV2G (∼4) versus cp26 (∼1) or lp25 (∼0.5) (Fig. 4B, left). The OspC protein profile reflected the relative abundances of ospC transcript among strains (Fig. 4C and data not shown). Consistent with this, we have noted that spirochetes carrying a gfp reporter gene inserted on lp25 fluoresced less brightly than spirochetes carrying the same gene on a shuttle vector (data not shown). Allelic exchange at the telomeric bbe02 locus did not alter either the copy number or the expression of the distal pncA locus on lp25, whereas the presence of the shuttle vector in the cell increased the copy number of lp25 approximately 2-fold (Fig. 4A and B, right). Additional experiments are needed to determine if this apparent in trans effect of the shuttle vector is reproducible and impacts the copy numbers of other endogenous plasmids and whether it results from E. coli or Borrelia sequences present on the shuttle vector.

Utility of lp25 for stable in trans gene complementation.Our next goal was to investigate whether lp25 could be used for stable complementation of B. burgdorferi mutants. OspC is required by B. burgdorferi for mammalian infection (14, 19, 49, 50). Complementation of an ospC mutant in trans with a shuttle vector restores mouse infectivity, but OspC is required by B. burgdorferi only during early mammalian infection (19) and the shuttle vector harboring the ospC gene is not maintained during persistent infection (19, 50). Therefore, we examined the phenotype of the ospCK1/ospC+ strain with respect to mouse infectivity, persistent infection, and stability of the wild-type copy of ospC on lp25.

To determine restoration of infectivity to the complemented strain, we inoculated mice with approximately 1 × 104 WT, ospCK1, or ospCK1/ospC+ spirochetes. Three weeks later, we assessed seroreactivity with B. burgdorferi proteins. As expected, animals injected with the ospCK1 mutant were seronegative, while mice injected with WT spirochetes or ospCK1/ospC+ seroconverted (Table 3). These data indicate that the wild-type ospC gene inserted on lp25 is functional and restored infectivity to the ospCK1 mutant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Mouse infectivity of WT, ospCK1 mutant, and ospCK1/ospC+ strains of B. burgdorferi

Next, we determined the ability of the ospCK1/ospC+ spirochetes to persist in mouse tissues. Mice infected with WT, ospCK1 mutant, and ospCK1/ospC+ strains were euthanized 7 to 8 weeks postinoculation, and spirochetes were isolated from the ear, bladder, and joint tissues. All mice injected with the complemented strain remained persistently infected, as did mice injected with the WT strain, but no spirochetes were isolated from any mice inoculated with the ospCK1 mutant (Table 3). Therefore, we conclude that OspC function was restored in ospCK1/ospC+ spirochetes and, furthermore, that these spirochetes were able to successfully colonize and persist in mouse tissues.

Persistent infection (which does not require OspC function) by ospCK1/ospC+ spirochetes indicated that lp25 was retained by the spirochetes, as some genes on the plasmid are essential for mouse infectivity (35, 51), but the presence of the ospC gene was not guaranteed. To confirm retention of both lp25 and ospC by ospCK1/ospC+ spirochetes in mice, the ear and bladder tissue isolates were passaged at 1:100 in BSK II medium with or without streptomycin supplementation. After 3 days, all tissue isolates had grown to high density, irrespective of the presence of the antibiotic, indicating that these spirochetes retained lp25 with the flaBp-aadA cassette, as anticipated. Additionally, the presence of the linked ospC gene in these spirochetes was confirmed by PCR (data not shown).

There are advantages to using lp25 for general complementation of B. burgdorferi mutants. Since inactivation of bbe02 significantly improves shuttle vector transformation of wild-type B. burgdorferi (33, 34) without any deleterious effect on surrounding genes or infectivity (34), it is possible to complement inactivated genes at this locus and subsequently perform efficient shuttle vector transformations, such as when introducing a reporter gene. A second advantage is the ensured retention of lp25 during in vitro propagation of complemented spirochetes (45, 52–55), with the insertion of the selectable marker into bbe02. Because lp25 carries genes essential for both tick and mammalian infectivity (13, 16, 18, 51), complementing an inactivated gene on lp25 ensures it will also be retained in vivo. In addition, lp25 can be used to complement mutations in genes that are lethal or deleterious when expressed from a higher-copy-number shuttle vector (9, 19, 31). Conveniently, complementation of mutants on lp25 using a multipurpose AEV eliminates the need for designing and constructing a new allelic-exchange plasmid for each experiment. Finally, complementation on lp25 does not alter the original mutation, as would be the case when performing in cis complementation (27).

We provide data validating the use of a multipurpose AEV for stable in trans complementation of an ospC mutant at a previously identified nonessential site on lp25. We conclude that using lp25, an endogenous and essential plasmid, provides an additional, convenient method for stable complementation of mutants in B. burgdorferi.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Martha Thayer, Phil Stewart, Amanda Brinkworth, and Sandy Stewart for their helpful comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Anita Mora and Austin Athman for assistance with graphics.

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIAID, NIH.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 4 November 2014.
    • Accepted 15 November 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 1 December 2014.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Burgdorfer W,
    2. Barbour AG,
    3. Hayes SF,
    4. Benach JL,
    5. Grunwaldt E,
    6. Davis JP
    . 1982. Lyme disease—a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science 216:1317–1319. doi:10.1126/science.7043737.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bono JL,
    2. Elias AF,
    3. Kupko JJ III,
    4. Stevenson B,
    5. Tilly K,
    6. Rosa P
    . 2000. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 182:2445–2452. doi:10.1128/JB.182.9.2445-2452.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Elias AF,
    2. Bono JL,
    3. Kupko JJ,
    4. Stewart PE,
    5. Krum JG,
    6. Rosa PA
    . 2003. New antibiotic resistance cassettes suitable for genetic studies in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 6:29–40. doi:10.1159/000073406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Frank KL,
    2. Bundle SF,
    3. Kresge ME,
    4. Eggers CH,
    5. Samuels DS
    . 2003. aadA confers streptomycin resistance in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 185:6723–6727. doi:10.1128/JB.185.22.6723-6727.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rosa P,
    2. Samuels DS,
    3. Hogan D,
    4. Stevenson B,
    5. Casjens S,
    6. Tilly K
    . 1996. Directed insertion of a selectable marker into a circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 178:5946–5953.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Samuels DS,
    2. Garon CF
    . 1997. Oligonucleotide-mediated genetic transformation of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiology 143:519–522. doi:10.1099/00221287-143-2-519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Samuels DS,
    2. Marconi RT,
    3. Huang WM,
    4. Garon CF
    . 1994. gyrB mutations in coumermycin A1-resistant Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 176:3072–3075.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sartakova M,
    2. Dobrikova E,
    3. Cabello FC
    . 2000. Development of an extrachromosomal cloning vector system for use in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4850–4855. doi:10.1073/pnas.080068797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sartakova ML,
    2. Dobrikova EY,
    3. Motaleb MA,
    4. Godfrey HP,
    5. Charon NW,
    6. Cabello FC
    . 2001. Complementation of a nonmotile flaB mutant of Borrelia burgdorferi by chromosomal integration of a plasmid containing a wild-type flaB allele. J Bacteriol 183:6558–6564. doi:10.1128/JB.183.22.6558-6564.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Stewart PE,
    2. Rosa PA,
    3. Tilly K
    . 2004. Linear plasmids in bacteria: common origins, uncommon ends, p 291–301. In Funnell BE, Phillips GJ (ed), Plasmid biology ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Stewart PE,
    2. Thalken R,
    3. Bono JL,
    4. Rosa P
    . 2001. Isolation of a circular plasmid region sufficient for autonomous replication and transformation of infectious Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol 39:714–721. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02256.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Caimano MJ,
    2. Iyer R,
    3. Eggers CH,
    4. Gonzalez C,
    5. Morton EA,
    6. Gilbert MA,
    7. Schwartz I,
    8. Radolf JD
    . 2007. Analysis of the RpoS regulon in Borrelia burgdorferi in response to mammalian host signals provides insight into RpoS function during the enzootic cycle. Mol Microbiol 65:1193–1217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05860.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Tilly K,
    3. Bueschel DM,
    4. Fisher MA,
    5. Policastro PF,
    6. Gherardini FC,
    7. Schwan TG,
    8. Rosa PA
    . 2005. Defining plasmids required by Borrelia burgdorferi for colonization of tick vector Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 42:676–684. doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0676:DPRBBB]2.0.CO;2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Tilly K,
    3. Byram R,
    4. Stewart PE,
    5. Krum JG,
    6. Bueschel DM,
    7. Schwan TG,
    8. Policastro PF,
    9. Elias AF,
    10. Rosa PA
    . 2004. Outer-surface protein C of the Lyme disease spirochete: a protein induced in ticks for infection of mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:3142–3147. doi:10.1073/pnas.0306845101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jewett MW,
    2. Lawrence K,
    3. Bestor AC,
    4. Tilly K,
    5. Grimm D,
    6. Shaw P,
    7. VanRaden M,
    8. Gherardini F,
    9. Rosa PA
    . 2007. The critical role of the linear plasmid lp36 in the infectious cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol 64:1358–1374. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05746.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Revel AT,
    2. Blevins JS,
    3. Almazan C,
    4. Neil L,
    5. Kocan KM,
    6. de la Fuente J,
    7. Hagman KE,
    8. Norgard MV
    . 2005. bptA (bbe16) is essential for the persistence of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, in its natural tick vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6972–6977. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502565102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Seshu J,
    2. Esteve-Gassent MD,
    3. Labandeira-Rey M,
    4. Kim JH,
    5. Trzeciakowski JP,
    6. Hook M,
    7. Skare JT
    . 2006. Inactivation of the fibronectin-binding adhesin gene bbk32 significantly attenuates the infectivity potential of Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol 59:1591–1601. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05042.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Strother KO,
    2. Broadwater A,
    3. de Silva A
    . 2005. Plasmid requirements for infection of ticks by Borrelia burgdorferi. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 5:237–245. doi:10.1089/vbz.2005.5.237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tilly K,
    2. Krum JG,
    3. Bestor A,
    4. Jewett MW,
    5. Grimm D,
    6. Bueschel D,
    7. Byram R,
    8. Dorward D,
    9. Stewart P,
    10. Rosa P
    . 2006. Borrelia burgdorferi OspC protein required exclusively in a crucial early stage of mammalian infection. Infect Immun 74:3554–3564. doi:10.1128/IAI.01950-05.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Xu Q,
    2. McShan K,
    3. Liang FT
    . 2008. Essential protective role attributed to the surface lipoproteins of Borrelia burgdorferi against innate defenses. Mol Microbiol 69:15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06264.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yang XF,
    2. Lybecker MC,
    3. Pal U,
    4. Alani SM,
    5. Blevins J,
    6. Revel AT,
    7. Samuels DS,
    8. Norgard MV
    . 2005. Analysis of the ospC regulatory element controlled by the RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 187:4822–4829. doi:10.1128/JB.187.14.4822-4829.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Kumar M,
    4. Pal U
    . 2009. BB0323 function is essential for Borrelia burgdorferi virulence and persistence through tick-rodent transmission cycle. J Infect Dis 200:1318–1330. doi:10.1086/605846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Xu Q,
    3. Tu J,
    4. Ge Y,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Liang FT
    . 2013. Increasing RpoS expression causes cell death in Borrelia burgdorferi. PLoS One 8:e83276. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tilly K,
    2. Bestor A,
    3. Rosa PA
    . 2013. Lipoprotein succession in Borrelia burgdorferi: similar but distinct roles for OspC and VlsE at different stages of mammalian infection. Mol Microbiol 89:216–227. doi:10.1111/mmi.12271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Casjens S,
    2. Palmer N,
    3. van Vugt R,
    4. Huang WM,
    5. Stevenson B,
    6. Rosa P,
    7. Lathigra R,
    8. Sutton G,
    9. Peterson J,
    10. Dodson RJ,
    11. Haft D,
    12. Hickey E,
    13. Gwinn M,
    14. White O,
    15. Fraser C
    . 2000. A bacterial genome in flux: the twelve linear and nine circular extrachromosomal DNAs in an infectious isolate of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol 35:490–516. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01698.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Fraser CM,
    2. Casjens S,
    3. Huang WM,
    4. Sutton GG,
    5. Clayton R,
    6. Lathigra R,
    7. White O,
    8. Ketchum KA,
    9. Dodson R,
    10. Hickey EK,
    11. Gwinn M,
    12. Dougherty B,
    13. Tomb J-F,
    14. Fleischmann RD,
    15. Richardson D,
    16. Peterson J,
    17. Kerlavage AR,
    18. Quackenbush J,
    19. Salzberg S,
    20. Hanson M,
    21. van Vugt R,
    22. Palmer N,
    23. Adams MD,
    24. Gocayne J,
    25. Weidmann J,
    26. Utterback T,
    27. Watthey L,
    28. McDonald L,
    29. Artiach P,
    30. Bowman C,
    31. Garland S,
    32. Fujii C,
    33. Cotton MD,
    34. Horst K,
    35. Roberts K,
    36. Hatch B,
    37. Smith HO,
    38. Venter JC
    . 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580–586. doi:10.1038/37551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Rosa PA,
    2. Cabello F,
    3. Samuels DS
    . 2010. Genetic manipulation of Borrelia burgdorferi, p 189–219. In Samuels DS, Radolf JD (ed), Borrelia: molecular biology, host interaction and pathogenesis Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Pal U,
    3. Ramamoorthi N,
    4. Liu X,
    5. Desrosiers DC,
    6. Eggers CH,
    7. Anderson JF,
    8. Radolf JD,
    9. Fikrig E
    . 2007. The Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi requires BB0690, a Dps homologue, to persist within ticks. Mol Microbiol 63:694–710. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05550.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hübner A,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Nolen DM,
    4. Popova TG,
    5. Cabello FC,
    6. Norgard M
    . 2001. Expression of Borrelia burgdorferi OspC and DbpA is controlled by a RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12724–12729. doi:10.1073/pnas.231442498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Tilly K,
    2. Elias AF,
    3. Errett J,
    4. Fischer E,
    5. Iyer R,
    6. Schwartz I,
    7. Bono JL,
    8. Rosa P
    . 2001. Genetics and regulation of chitobiose utilization in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 183:5544–5553. doi:10.1128/JB.183.19.5544-5553.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Eggers CH,
    2. Caimano MJ,
    3. Clawson ML,
    4. Miller WG,
    5. Samuels DS,
    6. Radolf JD
    . 2002. Identification of loci critical for replication and compatibility of a Borrelia burgdorferi cp32 plasmid and use of a cp32-based shuttle vector for expression of fluorescent reporters in the Lyme disease spirochaete. Mol Microbiol 43:281–295. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02758.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Chen Q,
    2. Fischer JR,
    3. Benoit VM,
    4. Dufour NP,
    5. Youderian P,
    6. Leong JM
    . 2008. In vitro CpG methylation increases the transformation efficiency of Borrelia burgdorferi strains harboring the endogenous linear plasmid lp56. J Bacteriol 190:7885–7891. doi:10.1128/JB.00324-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rego RO,
    2. Bestor A,
    3. Rosa PA
    . 2011. Defining the plasmid-encoded restriction-modification systems of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 193:1161–1171. doi:10.1128/JB.01176-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kawabata H,
    2. Norris SJ,
    3. Watanabe H
    . 2004. BBE02 disruption mutants of Borrelia burgdorferi B31 have a highly transformable, infectious phenotype. Infect Immun 72:7147–7154. doi:10.1128/IAI.72.12.7147-7154.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lawrenz MB,
    2. Kawabata H,
    3. Purser JE,
    4. Norris SJ
    . 2002. Decreased electroporation efficiency in Borrelia burgdorferi containing linear plasmids lp25 and lp56: impact on transformation of infectious Borrelia. Infect Immun 70:4798–4804. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.9.4798-4804.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Jacobs MB,
    2. Norris SJ,
    3. Phillippi-Falkenstein KM,
    4. Philipp MT
    . 2006. Infectivity of the highly transformable BBE02- lp56- mutant of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete, via ticks. Infect Immun 74:3678–3681. doi:10.1128/IAI.00043-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Elias AF,
    2. Bono JL,
    3. Carroll JA,
    4. Stewart P,
    5. Tilly K,
    6. Rosa P
    . 2000. Altered stationary phase response in a Borrelia burgdorferi rpoS mutant. J Bacteriol 182:2909–2918. doi:10.1128/JB.182.10.2909-2918.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Elias AF,
    2. Stewart PE,
    3. Grimm D,
    4. Caimano MJ,
    5. Eggers CH,
    6. Tilly K,
    7. Bono JL,
    8. Akins DR,
    9. Radolf JD,
    10. Schwan TG,
    11. Rosa P
    . 2002. Clonal polymorphism of Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 MI: implications for mutagenesis in an infectious strain background. Infect Immun 70:2139–2150. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.4.2139-2150.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Carroll JA,
    2. Garon CF,
    3. Schwan TG
    . 1999. Effects of environmental pH on membrane proteins in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 67:3181–3187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Vieira J,
    2. Messing J
    . 1991. New pUC-derived cloning vectors with different selectable markers and DNA replication origins. Gene 100:189–194. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(91)90365-I.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Jewett MW,
    2. Jain S,
    3. Linowski AK,
    4. Sarkar A,
    5. Rosa PA
    . 2011. Molecular characterization of the Borrelia burgdorferi in vivo-essential protein PncA. Microbiology 157:2831–2840. doi:10.1099/mic.0.051706-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Ramamoorthi N,
    2. Narasimhan S,
    3. Pal U,
    4. Bao F,
    5. Yang XF,
    6. Fish D,
    7. Anguita J,
    8. Norgard MV,
    9. Kantor FS,
    10. Anderson JF,
    11. Koski RA,
    12. Fikrig E
    . 2005. The Lyme disease agent exploits a tick protein to infect the mammalian host. Nature 436:573–577. doi:10.1038/nature03812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Eggers CH,
    3. Caimano MJ,
    4. Tilly K,
    5. Stewart PE,
    6. Elias AF,
    7. Radolf JD,
    8. Rosa PA
    . 2004. Experimental assessment of the roles of linear plasmids lp25 and lp28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi throughout the infectious cycle. Infect Immun 72:5938–5946. doi:10.1128/IAI.72.10.5938-5946.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Samuels DS
    . 1995. Electrotransformation of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Methods Mol Biol 47:253–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Purser JE,
    2. Norris SJ
    . 2000. Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13865–13870. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.25.13865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Dulebohn DP,
    2. Bestor A,
    3. Rego RO,
    4. Stewart PE,
    5. Rosa PA
    . 2011. The Borrelia burgdorferi linear plasmid lp38 is dispensable for completion of the mouse-tick infectious cycle. Infect Immun 79:3510–3517. doi:10.1128/IAI.05014-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Dulebohn DP,
    2. Hayes BM,
    3. Rosa PA
    . 2014. Global repression of host-associated genes of the Lyme disease spirochete through post-transcriptional modulation of the alternative sigma factor RpoS. PLoS One 9:e93141. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Bestor A,
    2. Rego RO,
    3. Tilly K,
    4. Rosa PA
    . 2012. Competitive advantage of Borrelia burgdorferi with outer surface protein BBA03 during tick-mediated infection of the mammalian host. Infect Immun 80:3501–3511. doi:10.1128/IAI.00521-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Stewart PE,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Bueschel DM,
    4. Clifton DR,
    5. Grimm D,
    6. Tilly K,
    7. Carroll JA,
    8. Weis JJ,
    9. Rosa PA
    . 2006. Delineating the requirement for the Borrelia burgdorferi virulence factor OspC in the mammalian host. Infect Immun 74:3547–3553. doi:10.1128/IAI.00158-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Tilly K,
    2. Bestor A,
    3. Jewett MW,
    4. Rosa P
    . 2007. Rapid clearance of Lyme disease spirochetes lacking OspC from skin. Infect Immun 75:1517–1519. doi:10.1128/IAI.01725-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Purser JE,
    2. Lawrenz MB,
    3. Caimano MJ,
    4. Radolf JD,
    5. Norris SJ
    . 2003. A plasmid-encoded nicotinamidase (PncA) is essential for infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi in a mammalian host. Mol Microbiol 48:753–764. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03452.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Elias AF,
    3. Tilly K,
    4. Rosa PA
    . 2003. Plasmid stability during in vitro propagation of Borrelia burgdorferi assessed at a clonal level. Infect Immun 71:3138–3145. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.6.3138-3145.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Labandeira-Rey M,
    2. Seshu J,
    3. Skare JT
    . 2003. The absence of linear plasmid 25 or 28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi dramatically alters the kinetics of experimental infection via distinct mechanisms. Infect Immun 71:4608–4613. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.8.4608-4613.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Schwan TG,
    2. Burgdorfer W,
    3. Garon CF
    . 1988. Changes in infectivity and plasmid profile of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, as a result of in vitro cultivation. Infect Immun 56:1831–1836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Kodner C,
    3. Coleman L,
    4. Johnson RC
    . 1996. Correlation of plasmids with infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto type strain B31. Infect Immun 64:3870–3876.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.
    1. Hayes B,
    2. Jewett M,
    3. Rosa P
    . 2010. A lacZ reporter system for use in Borrelia burgdorferi. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7407–7412. doi:10.1128/AEM.01389-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Use of an Endogenous Plasmid Locus for Stable in trans Complementation in Borrelia burgdorferi
Irene N. Kasumba, Aaron Bestor, Kit Tilly, Patricia A. Rosa
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2015, 81 (3) 1038-1046; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03657-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of an Endogenous Plasmid Locus for Stable in trans Complementation in Borrelia burgdorferi
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Use of an Endogenous Plasmid Locus for Stable in trans Complementation in Borrelia burgdorferi
Irene N. Kasumba, Aaron Bestor, Kit Tilly, Patricia A. Rosa
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2015, 81 (3) 1038-1046; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03657-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336