Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Ecology

Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies

Eric L. Bruger, Christopher M. Waters
M. A. Elliot, Editor
Eric L. Bruger
aDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
bBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Waters
aDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
bBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Elliot
McMaster University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01945-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    QS requirement for maximal growth of V. harveyi in M9-casein medium. Six strains of V. harveyi were grown for 24 h in M9 medium with different sole carbon sources and were enumerated through viable cell counting (CFU per milliliter). (A) Bar graph showing genotype productivity. Bars, productivity of a given genotype at the culmination of a single growth cycle (24 h) (n = 4 separate biological replicates); error bars, 95% confidence intervals for the mean estimates. WT, wild-type strain; SN, signal-negative strain; D47E, luxO D47E strain. Differences that were statistically significant, compared with the WT strain in the given medium type, are reported. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001. (B) Images of cooperator and defector genotypes in M9-casein medium after 24 h of growth.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    QS regulation of extracellular protease activity in V. harveyi. (A) Protease levels for cooperator and defector genotypes grown in M9-casein medium, plotted versus growth (measured as CFU per milliliter) (n = 3). Error bars, standard errors of the mean. (B) Effects of supernatant supplementation. Cultures of the ΔluxR strain were supplemented with supernatants from the strains indicated, at the indicated concentrations (n = 4). Error bars, 95% confidence intervals. ***, P < 0.001; N.S., not significant.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Fitness outcomes from single-growth-cycle competitions between different V. harveyi genotypes. In pairwise competitions between different V. harveyi strains, the starting competitor frequency was altered and competition experiments were completed in M9-casein medium for 24 h. Each point corresponds to a single competition outcome, and fit lines consist of regression fits (solid lines) bounded by 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for each competition pairing, according to a linear model. For each pairing, the strain whose relative fitness is reported on the y axis and starting percentage on the x axis is underlined.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Invasion of the ΔluxOU strain but not the WT strain by the ΔluxR defector. Populations contained one of the two cooperator strains, i.e., the WT strain or the ΔluxOU strain, and the ΔluxR defector at a 99:1 starting mixture, or vice versa. Cultures were grown for 24 h in M9-casein medium, diluted 1,000-fold, and repeated over multiple growth cycles. (A) Defector frequency (determined as nonluminescent colonies) plotted versus generations of growth. (B) Population productivity (measured as CFU per milliliter) plotted versus generations of growth. Error bars, 95% confidence intervals (n = 3 biological replicates per treatment).

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    WT strain optimization of growth strategies at low and high cell densities. (A) Bioluminescence induction of the WT strain and the ΔluxOU strain in monoculture over the course of a growth cycle in M9-casein medium. RLU, relative light units. (B) Defector frequency over a single growth cycle for the ΔluxOU strain versus the ΔluxR strain, the ΔluxOU strain versus the WT strain, and the WT strain versus the ΔluxR strain (with the defector strains underlined), started at 1% of the total population and competed in M9-casein medium. (C) Growth of the WT strain, the ΔluxR strain, and the ΔluxOU strain in monoculture over the course of a single growth cycle. Error bars, 95% confidence intervals (n = 4 biological replicates per treatment).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Description of strains used

    StrainGenotypeStrain description
    BB120ATCC BAA-1116Wild-type strain; has functional QS system
    KM669ΔluxRKnockout mutant of gene encoding QS master regulator LuxR; acts as defector
    JAF78ΔluxOUKnockout mutant of genes encoding LuxO and LuxU; acts as unconditional cooperator
    KM83luxO D47EPoint mutant, producing LuxO that constitutively mimics phosphorylated state; acts as defector
    JMH634ΔluxM ΔluxS ΔcqsATriple signal synthase mutant; unable to induce QS but responds to supplemented signal
    CW2001ΔluxABStrain with luciferase genes deleted; has functional QS system but is unable to produce light

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      V. harveyi requires QS for maximal signal production in M9-casein (Fig. S1), dependence of the performance of ΔluxR in mixed populations in M9-casein on the competing cooperator strain (Fig. S2), growth performance of mixed populations in competition in M9-casein (Fig. S3), V. harveyi QS providing equivalent fitness against defectors in M9-casein (Fig. S4), growth performance of ΔluxR defector in the presence and absence of competing strains (Fig. S5), and fitness outcomes from single growth cycle competitions between different V. harveyi strains in M9-tryptone media (Fig. S6).

      PDF, 554K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies
Eric L. Bruger, Christopher M. Waters
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2016, 82 (22) 6498-6506; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01945-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies
Eric L. Bruger, Christopher M. Waters
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Oct 2016, 82 (22) 6498-6506; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01945-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336