Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology | Spotlight

Mechanisms of Bacterial (Serratia marcescens) Attachment to, Migration along, and Killing of Fungal Hyphae

Tal Hover, Tal Maya, Sapir Ron, Hani Sandovsky, Yana Shadkchan, Nitzan Kijner, Yulia Mitiagin, Boris Fichtman, Amnon Harel, Robert M. Q. Shanks, Roberto E. Bruna, Eleonora García-Véscovi, Nir Osherov
A. A. Brakhage, Editor
Tal Hover
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tal Maya
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sapir Ron
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hani Sandovsky
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yana Shadkchan
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nitzan Kijner
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yulia Mitiagin
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Fichtman
bFaculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amnon Harel
bFaculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Q. Shanks
cCharles T. Campbell Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto E. Bruna
dInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleonora García-Véscovi
dInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nir Osherov
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. A. Brakhage
HKI and University of Jena
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.04070-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We have found a remarkable capacity for the ubiquitous Gram-negative rod bacterium Serratia marcescens to migrate along and kill the mycelia of zygomycete molds. This migration was restricted to zygomycete molds and several basidiomycete species. No migration was seen on any molds of the phylum Ascomycota. S. marcescens migration did not require fungal viability or surrounding growth medium, as bacteria migrated along aerial hyphae as well. S. marcescens did not exhibit growth tropism toward zygomycete mycelium. Bacterial migration along hyphae proceeded only when the hyphae grew into the bacterial colony. S. marcescens cells initially migrated along the hyphae, forming attached microcolonies that grew and coalesced to generate a biofilm that covered and killed the mycelium. Flagellum-defective strains of S. marcescens were able to migrate along zygomycete hyphae, although they were significantly slower than the wild-type strain and were delayed in fungal killing. Bacterial attachment to the mycelium does not necessitate type 1 fimbrial adhesion, since mutants defective in this adhesin migrated equally well as or faster than the wild-type strain. Killing does not depend on the secretion of S. marcescens chitinases, as mutants in which all three chitinase genes were deleted retained wild-type killing abilities. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which S. marcescens binds to, spreads on, and kills fungal hyphae might serve as an excellent model system for such interactions in general; fungal killing could be employed in agricultural fungal biocontrol.

INTRODUCTION

Prokaryote-eukaryote interactions are ubiquitous. Although the relationships between bacteria and plants or animals have gained the most attention, encounters among bacteria and fungi are likely far more common. Several studies have demonstrated numerous possible interactions between bacteria and fungi, including mutualism, commensalism, and pathogenesis (1–4). Hogan and Kolter (5) showed that the pathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is able to attach to, spread on, and kill the dimorphic pathogenic fungus Candida albicans in its filamentous form. P. aeruginosa initially forms discrete hypha-attached bacterial colonies and then forms biofilm (6). Spreading is reduced on the yeast form of C. albicans (7). In a phenomenon called “bacterial hitchhiking,” Staphylococcus aureus is able to invade host tissue and disseminate via adherence to the invasive hyphal elements of C. albicans (8). Furuno et al. (1) showed that dispersal of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida across air gaps, simulating nonsaturated soil, was made possible along the mycelium of the plant-pathogenic fungus Pythium ultimum, suggesting a mechanism for soil bacterial translocation across soil air pockets.

Preliminary research in our laboratory found that a nonpigmented strain of Serratia marcescens, isolated from compost, was capable of rapidly traveling over the mycelium of the fungus Rhizopus oryzae and other species of fungi from the phylum Zygomycota. To date, and to the best of our knowledge, a trophic interaction between the bacterium S. marcescens and zygomycete fungi has not been described.

Serratia spp. are ubiquitous inhabitants of soil, water, and plant surfaces and are commonly associated with food spoilage. S. marcescens, in particular, represents an important nosocomial pathogen capable of causing pneumonia, intravenous-catheter-associated infections, ocular and urinary tract infections, osteomyelitis, and endocarditis (9).

S. marcescens is unique among enteric bacteria in many aspects. It secretes extracellular DNase, gelatinase, lipase, several proteases, a red pigment (prodigiosin), three chitinases, and a chitin binding protein. It is in fact believed to be one of the most efficient chitin-degrading bacteria in the environment (10).

Fungi of the order Mucorales, phylum Zygomycota, are filamentous aseptate molds. Most members of the Mucorales are thermotolerant saprotrophs and are common worldwide in soil and in decaying matter. Mucormycosis, an infection caused by fungi of the order Mucorales, is an uncommon yet often deadly infection in immunocompromised patients (11). It is noteworthy that zygomycetes are the only members of the fungal kingdom whose cell wall is composed primarily of chitin (12), which is susceptible to enzymatic breakdown by chitinases secreted by S. marcescens (10).

To define the complex interactions between the bacterium S. marcescens and fungi, we tested the hypotheses that the bacterium has the ability to use fungal hyphae as a means of translocation and that this ability is most significant when the bacterium is in contact with fungi of the phylum Zygomycota. We also attempted to identify the molecular mechanisms underlying the ability of S. marcescens to spread along and kill fungal mycelia. It has been suggested in the past that some of the bacterial virulence arsenal used against humans has evolved to combat microbial eukaryotes found in their surroundings; therefore, a better understanding of these microscopic encounters may help to improve both bacterial infection prophylaxis and fungicidal therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Organisms and culture conditions.All fungal strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Fungi were cultivated on YAG (0.5% [wt/vol] yeast extract, 1% [wt/vol] glucose, 10 mM MgSO4, 1.5% [wt/vol] agar) supplemented with trace elements and vitamins. Spores were harvested in 0.2% (vol/vol) Tween 20, resuspended in double-distilled water, and counted with a hemocytometer. Due to a lack of spore formation, basidiomycete strains were cultured by seeding mycelial plugs ∼2 cm2 in size from a 2- to 5-day-old mycelium grown on YAG at 37°C. Mycelia were harvested with a sterile surgical blade under aseptic conditions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Bacterial and fungal strains used in this study

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, all strains were cultivated at 37°C on modified SOC (0.5% [wt/vol] yeast extract, 2% [wt/vol] tryptone, 0.5% [wt/vol] glucose, 10 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 1.5% [wt/vol] agar) in the presence of antibiotic selection as required for each strain. Optical density (OD) was determined spectrophotometrically at 600 nm. The antibiotics used in the study were ampicillin (100 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (20 μg/ml), gentamicin (10 μg/ml), and kanamycin (100 μg/ml).

Qualitative measurement of S. marcescens spreading over fungal mycelium.Ascomycota/Zygomycota and S. marcescens 1 or RM66262 were inoculated as streaks at a 45° angle on solid medium and incubated at 30 or 37°C for 48 h. Inoculation was performed by streaking a spore-bacterial suspension; the first streak was allowed to dry thoroughly prior to the next to avoid dragging the spores along the path of the bacteria. Bacterial spreading along the mycelium was assessed visually.

For nonsporulating basidiomycetes, mature mycelial plugs were seeded on an SOC plate, forming a line. After 2 to 5 days at 30°C, 10 μl of S. marcescens 1 or S. marcescens RM66262 suspension (OD, 0.5) were inoculated adjacent to the newly formed mycelium and incubated at 30 or 37°C. Bacterial spreading along the mycelium was visually evaluated.

Quantitative measurement of S. marcescens spreading over R. oryzae 3465 mycelium.To measure the rate of bacterial spreading over fungal mycelia, fresh spores of R. oryzae 3465 were spread over an SOC plate at a concentration of 2.5 × 104 spores/cm2, allowed to germinate for 12 h at 37°C, and then inoculated at the center of the plate by pipetting 5 μl of bacterial suspension grown at 30°C in SOC to exponential phase (OD = 0.5) on the agar surface. After incubation at 30°C, the plates were sampled by the insertion of a 96-pin metal replicator (of which 66 pins fit into the plate) into the agar and replication onto fresh SOC plates at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postinoculation. Replicated plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, when bacterial colonies were clearly visible. The number of positive pinned colonies was used as an estimate for the rate of bacterial spreading. Student's t test was used to determine the statistical significance of bacterial spreading at each time point. Significance was defined at a P value of 0.05.

S. marcescens killing of R. oryzae 3465 mycelium.Fresh spores of R. oryzae 3465 were spread over 24-well SOC agar plates (1.5 ml of SOC/well) at a concentration of 2.5 ×104 spores/well and allowed to grow for 12 h at 37°C. Each mycelium-covered well was then inoculated at the center by pipetting 5 μl of S. marcescens suspension grown at 30°C in SOC to exponential phase (OD = 0.5). Plates were incubated at 30°C for the time periods indicated in Fig. 7B and 8B. At each time point, the agar plug (containing bacteria and mold) was removed from the well with a sterile spatula, placed inverted on the surface of an SOC agar plate containing antibiotics for 24 h at 37°C, and scored for radial growth of the fungus. No detectable fungal growth was defined as 100% killing by the bacteria.

S. marcescens migration over dead fungal mycelium.A total of 105 R. oryzae spores were grown in a petri dish containing 20 ml of liquid YAG at 37°C for 24 h, forming a thick mycelium in which sporulation had not begun. The medium was then gently suctioned from the plate, and the mycelium was frozen intact at −70°C and lyophilized. For preparation of the Aspergillus fumigatus mycelium, 105 A. fumigatus spores were grown in 100 ml of liquid YAG under shaking at 37°C for 24 h. The mycelial suspension was poured over Miracloth to form a thin layer, dried, frozen intact at −70°C, and lyophilized.

Mycelia were then exposed to UV radiation (wavelength, 312 nm; 10,000 μW/cm2; 60 min for each side of the mycelium) on a Vilber Lourmat ECX-F15m UV table. Complete mycelial death was confirmed by placing the mycelia on solid SOC agar for 24 h, during which no growth was seen. Bacterial migration was tested by cutting the dead mycelium into triangles with a sterile surgical blade and placing the pieces 2 to 3 mm apart from a bacterial colony made of 5 μl of logarithmic-phase (OD = 0.5) bacteria suspended in SOC. The mycelium and bacterial colony were placed on the plate simultaneously but without contact to avoid capillary suction of bacteria along the hyphae; instead, the bacterial colony was allowed to grow for 24 to 48 h at 30°C or 37°C until contact was naturally made with the edge of the mycelium.

S. marcescens movement over aerial fungal hyphae.The experiment was conducted on plastic stages raised ∼3 mm inside a petri dish and separated by ∼3 mm. The plastic stages were bent to the desired shape, autoclaved, and aseptically fixed to a sterile dry petri dish with epoxy glue. Humidity was maintained by pouring 3 ml of a sterile 1.5% (wt/vol) agar solution on each side of the plate. Blocks of SOC agar were cut off a freshly poured plate and placed on top of the stages, inoculated with R. oryzae spores and an S. marcescens 1 suspension at opposite sides, and incubated at 37°C for 48 to 96 h to allow bridging of the gap by the fungal hyphae. Bacterial movement was confirmed by microscopy and by sampling the fungal mycelium with a sterile wooden stick; these samples were point inoculated on solid SOC agar and grown for 24 h at 37°C.

Fluorescence microscopy of S. marcescens attachment to fungal hyphae on solid medium.R. oryzae 3465 spores were placed and allowed to germinate at 37°C overnight on SOC agar plates. A 5-μl suspension of S. marcescens RM66262 pGFP grown in liquid SOC (OD = 0.5) was placed as a droplet next to the fungal hyphae. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and viewed by fluorescence microscopy on an Olympus IX50 microscope equipped for fluorescence, at a magnification of ×400. Images were recorded with a digital Olympus DP70 camera.

SEM analysis.S. marcescens RM66262 and R. oryzae 3465 were grown on SOC agar plates, as described in the previous section. Fixation and processing of samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed, essentially as described previously (13). Briefly, 5- by 5-mm fragments were carefully excised from the zone of interaction and vapor fixed with 8% paraformaldehyde and 4% glutaraldehyde dissolved in water for 1 h in a closed chamber. Secondary vapor fixation was then performed in an aqueous solution of 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. The samples were submerged for 10 min in double-distilled water (DDW) and then dehydrated (10 min, twice for each step) under a series of ethanol concentrations (7.5%, 15%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, and 100%). Next, samples underwent critical-point drying using a K850 critical-point dryer (Quorum Technologies, United Kingdom). Coating was performed with 3 nm of iridium using a Q150T coater (Quorum Technologies). Samples were imaged with a Merlin scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Germany).

RESULTS

S. marcescens migrates along zygomycete and some basidiomycete molds.While studying the interaction between various bacteria and molds isolated from compost heaps, we noticed that a bacterial S. marcescens isolate was able to spread rapidly over the mycelia of zygomycete molds isolated from the same microenvironment, whereas no spreading of S. marcescens over Aspergillus flavus mycelium or the surrounding agar surface was seen (Fig. 1). To better define this phenomenon, 26 fungal species representing three phyla (Table 1) were tested against one red-pigmented environmental strain of S. marcescens 1 and one nonpigmented patient-isolated strain (RM66262) at 30 or 37°C on 1.5% SOC agar. We decided to use two temperatures, since Soo et al. (14) showed that a wild-type clinical isolate of S. marcescens (CH-1) exhibited a characteristic swarmer phenotype on L-broth solidified with 0.8% agar at 30°C, but no swarming was noted on identical plates incubated at 37°C, even after 48 h. Results were assessed visually following photography of the plates. Both Serratia strains migrated along all zygomycete species tested at both 30 and 37°C, whereas no migration was seen along ascomycete fungi (Aspergillus and Penicillium). Interestingly, both S. marcescens 1 and S. marcescens RM66262 migrated along three basidiomycete species: Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Ustilago sphaerogena, and Gloeophyllum trabeum. Both strains migrated over the mycelial periphery of Lentinus lepideus and Ganoderma lucidum and did not migrate along the mycelia of the basidiomycetes Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus pulmonarius, Schizophyllum commune, and Trametes versicolor (Table 1).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

S. marcescens spreads over Rhizopus oryzae mold. S. marcescens 1 (red) was cocultured at a 45° angle to various mold species (white). (A) Aspergillus flavus AflI and S. marcescens 1 after 48 h of coincubation. No spreading of S. marcescens over A. flavus mycelium is seen. (B to D) R. oryzae and S. marcescens 1 after 24 h (B), 30 h (C), and 48 h (D) of incubation. Spreading of pigmented S. marcescens over R. oryzae mycelium can be clearly seen preceding the growing hyphal tips at 24 and 30 h (arrows) and covering the entire mycelium after 48 h. All samples were incubated at 37°C on SOC plates.

S. marcescens does not exhibit active chemotaxis toward R. oryzae.We hypothesized that under optimal conditions for bacterial migration, S. marcescens may exhibit active chemotaxis toward the fungal colony. To test this, we point inoculated S. marcescens RM66262 next to point-inoculated R. oryzae 3465 on SOC agar. Following incubation of 24 h at 37°C, no change was seen in the shape or outline of the bacterial colony toward the fungal colony (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, fungal growth was reduced in the vicinity of the bacterial colony. Bacterial migration commenced only after hyphae made contact with the edge of the bacterial colony, suggesting the necessity of physical contact (Fig. 2B). Similar results were seen with either S. marcescens 1 or RM66262 point inoculated next to R. oryzae 3465 at 30°C (not shown).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

S. marcescens strain RM66262 does not show chemotaxis toward R. oryzae 5698. Bacterial and fungal strains were point inoculated adjacently. (A) No visible change in bacterial colony morphology is observed, indicating that there is no chemotaxis. (B) S. marcescens migration begins only after hyphae have invaded the bacterial colony. Isolates were grown on SOC at 37°C for 24 h. Identical results were seen with S. marcescens 1 and R. oryzae 3465.

S. marcescens migrates over dead fungal hyphae.To test the ability of S. marcescens to migrate over killed fungal hyphae, S. marcescens 1 was inoculated 2 to 3 mm from the edge of UV-killed and lyophilized R. oryzae 3465 or A. fumigatus mycelium. As controls, we used live mycelia. As described above, live R. oryzae mycelium supported bacterial migration, whereas live A. fumigatus mycelium did not. Interestingly, S. marcescens 1 in contact with live A. fumigatus showed decreased color (prodigiosin production), possibly as a result of toxins produced by the fungus. Both dead R. oryzae and A. fumigatus mycelia were entirely covered by bacteria after 36 h of incubation at 30°C (Fig. 3). Expansion in other directions, or beyond the margin of the mycelium, was negligible. Similar results were seen at 37°C (not shown). These findings suggest that (i) live A. fumigatus actively repels invasion by S. marcescens, whereas R. oryzae does not, and (ii) dead A. fumigatus does not actively repel S. marcescens, allowing it, like R. oryzae, to serve as a passive scaffold and highway for the spread of the bacteria.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

S. marcescens 1 migrates over killed mycelium of R. oryzae 3465 and A. fumigatus but fails to migrate on live A. fumigatus mycelium. Following 36 h of incubation at 30°C on SOC plates, red bacterial coloration is visible on the entire mycelial surface and edges of live or killed R. oryzae mycelium (top). In contrast, S. marcescens spreads on killed A. fumigatus mycelium but fails to do so on live mycelium (bottom).

S. marcescens can migrate directly across aerial hyphae without contacting the agar surface.To test the ability of S. marcescens to migrate exclusively along fungal hyphae, we designed a model containing two separate blocks of agar, one inoculated with S. marcescens 1 and the other with R. oryzae 3465 or R. oryzae 5698, separated by an aerial gap (Fig. 4A to C). Movement between the isolated blocks is possible only via the bridge of aerial hyphae formed between them after ∼48 h of incubation at 37°C in a humid chamber. Successful bacterial “bridging” was defined by positive growth of the bacterium on the fungal agar block or the fungal mycelia bridging the air gap after sampling with a wooden toothpick. After 96 h of incubation, bacteria were found on hyphae bridging the air gap in 100% of the R. oryzae samples. In half of the samples, bacteria were found on the opposing agar block inoculated with R. oryzae alone, indicating that they had both bridged the gap and colonized the fungus (Table 2). Microscopic examination clearly identified red patches of bacteria migrating over the bridging aerial hyphae (Fig. 4C, bottom).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

S. marcescens 1 crosses an aerial bridge of R. oryzae 3465 hyphae. (A and B) Scheme of bridging experiment plate, containing two separate raised SOC agar blocks (orange in panel B) inoculated with bacterial and fungal inoculum separately and incubated in a humid chamber. To eliminate bacterial migration in the water condensate, the SOC agar blocks are placed over raised plastic stages (yellow in panels B and C). Humidity is maintained by pouring 3 ml of a 1.5% agar solution at each side of the plate (colorless in panel B). (C) The air gap is bridged by fungal hyphae after <48 h at 37°C. The box enlarged at the bottom of panel C (top view with a binocular microscope) shows that S. marcescens 1 (red arrow) spreads along R. oryzae 3465 aerial hyphae (red arrow), bridging the gap between the agar blocks after 48 h of incubation at 37°C.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Bacterial migration over aerial fungal hyphaea

Microscopic analysis of S. marcescens movement along R. oryzae hyphae on solid medium by fluorescence and SEM.For fluorescence microscopy, R. oryzae 3465 mycelia and adjacently inoculated S. marcescens RM66262-pGFP were grown on SOC agar until physical contact between the organisms occurred. The interaction was followed by light and fluorescence microscopy. S. marcescens migration began ∼60 min after hyphae penetrated the bacterial colony. Interestingly, most bacteria could be seen moving and forming small microcolonies along the hyphae after 90 min, while some moved along the agar surface between hyphae (Fig. 5, 90 min). Bacterial biofilm formation occurred after ∼4 h as the microcolonies expanded and coalesced, forming a thick layer around the hyphae (Fig. 5, 4-h time point). High-resolution surface imaging by SEM reinforced these observations, highlighting the aggregation of microcolonies along the hyphae during early migration (Fig. 6A to D) and the subsequent formation of a mature biofilm covering the mycelium (Fig. 6E and F).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Fluorescence microscopy of S. marcescens interacting with R. oryzae mycelium. S. marcescens 66262/pGFP and R. oryzae 3465 were inoculated adjacently on SOC agar plates and incubated at 37°C until the fungal hyphae came into physical contact with the bacterial colony (time zero [t = 0′]). Light and fluorescent (green fluorescent protein [GFP]) microscopy were performed on the contact region at different time points. The arrow indicates initial early colonization of hyphae by S. marcescens bacteria after 60 min of interaction. Scale bar = 50 μm.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

High-resolution SEM imaging of S. marcescens interacting with R. oryzae mycelium. S. marcescens RM66262 forms discrete colonies on R. oryzae 3465 hyphae during early (1 to 2 h) contact on the surface of SOC agar plates (A; the inset in panel A is enlarged in panel B), on aerial hyphae (C; the inset in panel C is enlarged in panel D), later (4 h) forming a mature biofilm (E; the inset in panel E is enlarged in panel F) covering the hyphae. (F) Note the numerous bacteria visible just below the surface of the biofilm in panel E that can be clearly seen where the biofilm surface is disrupted.

S. marcescens mutants lacking a flagellum show impaired migration and killing of R. oryzae 3465 mycelia.Flagella have been shown to be important for many types of active bacterial translocation. We therefore hypothesized that flagellar expression is important for S. marcescens migration over fungal mycelia. To test this, the motility of S. marcescens RM66262 strains with deletions of flhD (lacking FlhD2C2, the flagellar master regulator operon) and fliA (lacking FliA, a transcriptional factor specifically required for the control of the final stages of flagellar assembly, downstream of FlhD2C2) was compared to that of the S. marcescens RM66262 isogenic wild type. Spreading motility was measured on a mycelium-covered plate (R. oryzae 3465), as described in Materials and Methods. Our results show that spreading of the ΔfliA and ΔflhD mutants was slower than that of the wild type (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, the killing abilities of the S. marcescens ΔfliA and ΔflhD mutants were diminished (Fig. 7B). Whereas the wild-type S. marcescens strain killed R. oryzae 3465 after 36 h of coinoculation, the mutant strains took 48 h. This is not due to their impaired spreading; the killing assay measures the time needed to kill a mycelium growing on a very small 1.5-cm agar plug that is completely covered by S. marcescens in ∼4 h (see Materials and Methods).

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

S. marcescens mutants lacking a flagellum show impaired migration and killing of R. oryzae 3465. (A) To measure bacterial spreading, the S. marcescens RM66262 wild type (WT), ΔflhD mutant (defective in the flagellar master regulator), and ΔfliA mutant (defective in the flagellar class 2 gene) were inoculated separately in the center of SOC agar petri dishes coated with 12-h-old R. oryzae 3465 mycelia and incubated at 30°C. Bacterial migration was measured by periodic replication of the plates onto fresh SOC medium. The number of new bacterial colonies was used as a marker of bacterial migration rate. (B) To measure hyphal killing, S. marcescens strains were inoculated in the center of 1.5-cm SOC wells coated with 12-h-old R. oryzae 3465 mycelia and incubated at 30°C. Hyphal killing was measured by removing the agar plugs from the wells, incubating them on SOC-kanamycin plates, and scoring the plates for fungal growth, as described in Materials and Methods. The data are representative of the results from three experiments; shown are averages ± standard deviations (SD) from triplicate samples. **, P < 0.005 between mutant and WT strains.

Because the expression of the Serratia phospholipase PhlA is transcriptionally regulated by FliA and its secretion depends on the integrity of the flagellar secretome (15), we tested whether PhlA might be responsible for the reduced killing observed for the ΔflhDC and ΔfliA mutant strains. Moreover, because the levels of expression of the pore-forming toxin ShlA (encoded by the shlBA operon) were previously shown to be controlled by the FlhDC-FliA regulatory cascade (16, 17), we also assayed the ΔshlB mutant strain for its R. oryzae 3465 killing capacity. However, there were no differences in the killing values of the ΔphlA or ΔshlB mutant strains from that of the wild-type strain (data not shown), indicating that the altered expression of these secreted enzymes in the ΔflhD or ΔfliA mutant strains is not responsible for the observed attenuated killing phenotype, although we cannot rule out the possibility that the deletion of ΔphlA and ΔshlB together may contribute synergistically to fungal killing.

S. marcescens strains defective in fimbrial expression migrate faster along R. oryzae 3465 mycelia than strains that are not defective.Type 1 fimbriae play a significant role in bacterial attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces. To determine whether attachment by type 1 fimbriae affects bacterial migration over fungal mycelia, we compared the migration rates of S. marcescens CMS 515 (oxyR2, a fimbria-lacking mutant lacking the OxyR transcription factor that activates the fimABCD operon) and CMS 629 (contains a fimC mutant usher gene required for fimbria formation) to those of the CMS 376 wild type and CMS 519 (the oxyR2 mutant revertant that generates fimbriae like the wild type) (18). These results show that bacteria defective in fimbrial expression migrate faster along the mycelia of R. oryzae 3465 (Fig. 8A). These results suggest that fimbrial adhesion impedes migration, perhaps through the formation of a dense bacterial biofilm or tighter adhesion to the hyphal mycelium. Loss of fimbriae in the mutant strains did not affect their ability to kill R. oryzae 3465 mycelia at the same rate as the wild-type strain (Fig. 8B), suggesting that killing does not necessitate fimbria-mediated attachment.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Fimbria-defective S. marcescens mutants migrate faster than the wild type along R. oryzae hyphae. (A) Migration along a preformed R. oryzae 3465 mycelium by the S. marcescens CMS 376 wild type, ΔoxyR2 mutant (defective in the oxidative-stress reaction and fimbrial expression), and ΔfimC mutant (defective in fimbrial structural genes). Strains were inoculated separately on the center of an R. oryzae 3465 mycelium and incubated at 30°C. Bacterial migration was measured, as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Killing of hyphae by S. marcescens fimbria-defective mutants is unchanged relative to that of the CMS 376 wild-type strain. The data are representative of the results from three experiments; shown are averages ± SD from triplicate samples. *, P < 0. 05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005 between mutant and WT strains.

Secreted S. marcescens chitinases are not involved in killing R. oryzae 3465 mycelia.Because S. marcescens produces extraordinary amounts of secreted chitinases and the zygomycetes contain an unusually high proportion of chitin in their cell walls, we hypothesized that fungal killing is mediated by secreted S. marcescens chitinases. We therefore compared the spreading and killing activities of a no-Chi (ΔchiA ΔchiB ΔchiC) triple mutant lacking any detectable secreted chitinase activity to those of the isogenic wild-type Dba10 strain (19). There was no difference in the ability of the no-Chi mutant to spread along R. oryzae 3465 mycelia from that of the wild-type strain (Fig. 9A), and more surprisingly, the killing ability of the mutant was completely unaffected (Fig. 9B). This suggests that the ability of S. marcescens to kill the fungus depends on an as-yet-unidentified pathway. Secreted S. marcescens chitinases may be involved in digesting the fungus after it is killed.

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

S. marcescens migration and killing of R. oryzae 3465 do not depend on its ability to secrete chitinases. (A) To measure bacterial spreading, the S. marcescens Db10 wild type and Db10-NoChi strain (lacking detectable secreted chitinase activity) were inoculated separately in the center of SOC agar petri dishes coated with 12-h-old R. oryzae 3465 mycelia and incubated at 30°C. Bacterial migration was measured by periodic replication of the plates onto fresh SOC medium. The number of new bacterial colonies was used as a marker of the bacterial migration rate. (B) To measure hyphal killing, S. marcescens strains were inoculated in the center of 1.5-cm SOC wells coated with 12-h-old R. oryzae 3465 mycelia and incubated at 30°C. Hyphal killing was measured by removing the agar plugs from the wells, incubating them on SOC-kanamycin plates, and scoring the plates for fungal growth, as described in Materials and Methods. The data are representative of the results from three experiments showing the averages ± SD from triplicate samples.

DISCUSSION

Previous unpublished work undertaken in our laboratory showed that an environmental strain of S. marcescens isolated from a compost heap in Israel rapidly and efficiently migrated along the mycelia of zygomycete molds grown on agar plates. Here, we describe a series of experiments to better understand this phenomenon.

Migration of S. marcescens over fungi has some specificity.A migration screen between two strains of S. marcescens and numerous fungi from different divisions revealed that while the bacterium was able to migrate along the mycelia of all eight species of zygomycetes tested, no migration was observed with seven ascomycete species, while basidiomycete species gave mixed results, with two out of 10 species enabling strong migration, while others allowed only peripheral migration or none at all. These results can be explained by two alternative nonexclusive hypotheses: (i) there is a species–phylum-specific interaction between particular cell surface bacterial and fungal determinants (i.e., adhesins) that mediates attachment and movement, and bacterial attachment and movement occur only on fungi possessing these determinants; (ii) some fungal species/phyla produce surface or secreted defense factors that block bacterial interactions, and bacterial attachment and movement occur only in fungi lacking these defenses. We showed that dead A. fumigatus mycelium supports bacterial migration, while live mycelium repels it. This suggests that the live mycelium secretes factors that block bacterial interaction and migration, supporting the second hypothesis, at least for A. fumigatus. The identity of these bacterium-repelling fungal factors is of considerable interest and will be investigated in our future work.

S. marcescens mycelial migration is an active, ordered process.S. marcescens was able to migrate along architecturally preserved UV-killed R. oryzae mycelia, suggesting that bacterial translocation is an active bacterium-dependent process that is not influenced by hyphal growth and transport. Migration also occurred along fungal hyphae suspended in the air, suggesting that the bacteria possess a means of attachment to the fungal cell wall surface. S. marcescens hyphal migration appears to follow three steps: (i) initial rapid movement of individual bacteria along or between the fungal hyphae, (ii) attachment of these colonizer bacteria and the formation of discrete bacterial colonies, and finally, (iii) the coalescing of these colonies to form a biofilm.

Flagellar expression supports S. marcescens migration over fungal hyphae but is not the only mode of transport.The hypothesis that bacterial translocation along hyphae was flagellum dependent was tested using S. marcescens ΔflhD (carrying the flagellar expression master operon) and ΔfliA (encoding an alternative sigma factor, expressed during flagellar assembly) mutant strains (20). Both mutants showed greatly decreased swarming and swimming in standard tests (data not shown). Both the ΔflhD and ΔfliA mutations strongly reduced the rate of bacterial expansion over R. oryzae mycelium, but they both nevertheless spread over approximately half of the entire agar surface of the plate after 24 h of coincubation. These results might be explained by the existence of an additional non-flagellum-dependent mode of transportation that enables slower movement along hyphae, such as sliding, which is mediated by quorum sensing and the production of surface tension-modifying surfactants. Surfactant production and flagellar expression are regulated by different genes and environmental signals. The sliding hypothesis can be tested with mutant strains defective in surfactant production (21). Interestingly, Pseudomonas putida bacteria lacking flagella lose their ability to migrate along hyphae, suggesting that unlike S. marcescens, they rely entirely on flagella to move along the fungal mycelium (22).

Our finding that killing of R. oryzae mycelium was delayed in the ΔflhD and ΔfliA S. marcescens strains might be due to the fact that the flagellum also functions as a secretion system with structural and functional relatedness to the type III secretion system. The flagellum is able to translocate the components involved not only in self-assembly but also in the secretion of nonflagellar proteins (23). Nonflagellar effectors secreted by the flagellum in S. marcescens include PhlA phospholipase (15). Furthermore, ShlA expression has been demonstrated to be activated by FliA at the transcriptional level (16). However, in a preliminary analysis, we found that S. marcescens phlA- and shlA-null mutants retained wild-type fungal killing abilities. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that another yet-unknown protein(s) that might be transcriptionally dependent on the flagellar regulatory cascade or secreted by the flagellar secretome exerts part of the observed fungal mycelium killing by Serratia.

S. marcescens attachment to fungi and the role of type 1 fimbriae.We reasoned that S. marcescens mutants lacking type 1 fimbriae, hair-like appendages that enable the bacterium to attach to biotic and abiotic surfaces, will have a reduced capacity for migration over fungi. Two fimbria-defective mutants (oxyR and fimC mutants) spread faster during the first 8 to 12 h. Thus, we propose that the attachment of the afimbrial mutants to hyphae is weaker, enabling them to undergo faster initial migration. Another possible explanation is the intimate involvement of fimbriae in bacterium-bacterium attachment and biofilm formation; reduced interbacterial attachment may free the colony for faster movement and expansion.

S. marcescens fungal killing does not depend on the secretion of chitinases.S. marcescens secretes unusually high levels of three extracellular chitinases (ChiA, ChiB, and ChiC), enabling it to use chitin as a source of nitrogen and carbon (10, 19). We hypothesized that S. marcescens utilizes secreted chitinases to specifically target and kill zygomycete molds, because they contain unusually high levels of chitin (in the form of chitosan) in their cell walls (12). Surprisingly, we found that an S. marcescens triple-deletion mutant (ΔchiA ΔchiB ΔchiC) with no detectable secreted chitinase activity retained wild-type fungal killing abilities. We propose that S. marcescens-mediated fungal killing is carried out by additional as-yet-unknown virulence factors and that chitinases are used to degrade the cell wall during the next step of digestion and assimilation. P. aeruginosa killing of C. albicans hyphae is understood in much greater detail: it involves both contact-mediated and soluble secreted factors, such as phospholipase C and phenazine derivatives (5, 6, 24), suggesting similar approaches to pursue in our future studies.

It is interesting to compare the S. marcescens-zygomycete interactions that we have described here to those found for P. aeruginosa-C. albicans interactions, which are the most extensively studied system of bacterial-fungal interaction. In both cases and over similar time scales, the bacteria formed biofilms on the hyphal surface, leading to fungal death (5). However, P. aeruginosa-C. albicans binding occurs in liquid medium, and unlike S. marcescens, P. aeruginosa does not rapidly spread over fungal mycelia growing on agar surfaces (5). While flagellum-defective S. marcescens strains were delayed in spreading and killing of the fungus, similar P. aeruginosa mutants showed normal killing. While pilus-deficient S. marcescens strains showed increased spreading rates along hyphae and normal killing, P. aeruginosa mutants showed normal biofilm formation but delayed killing. These findings suggest that the molecular mechanism of S. marcescens-zygomycete interaction differs substantially from that of P. aeruginosa and C. albicans.

In summary, our characterization of the mechanisms allowing S. marcescens to migrate over fungal mycelia revealed a complex, multigenetic, and multifactorial system. The complexity of the interaction, which takes place on solid agar surfaces and not in suspension in liquid medium, makes it difficult to analyze experimentally. It is unclear whether the fungi serve as a highway, a nutrient source, or both. The chemical and physical nature of bacterial attachment seems to involve numerous mechanisms, and the common properties of the fungi found to support or repel migration will have to be further characterized as well.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Frank Sargent from the University of Dundee, United Kingdom, for his generous donation of bacterial mutant strains and Dana Levinson from the faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Rehovot, Israel, for the generous donation of fungal basidiomycete strains.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 21 December 2015.
    • Accepted 12 February 2016.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 19 February 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Furuno S,
    2. Pazolt K,
    3. Rabe C,
    4. Neu TR,
    5. Harms H,
    6. Wick LY
    . 2010. Fungal mycelia allow chemotactic dispersal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in water-unsaturated systems. Environ Microbiol 12:1391–1398.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kohlmeier S,
    2. Smits TH,
    3. Ford RM,
    4. Keel C,
    5. Harms H,
    6. Wick LY
    . 2005. Taking the fungal highway: mobilization of pollutant-degrading bacteria by fungi. Environ Sci Technol 39:4640–4646. doi:10.1021/es047979z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wick LY,
    2. Remer R,
    3. Wurz B,
    4. Reichenbach J,
    5. Braun S,
    6. Schafer F,
    7. Harms H
    . 2007. Effect of fungal hyphae on the access of bacteria to phenanthrene in soil. Environ Sci Technol 41:500–505. doi:10.1021/es061407s.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Peleg AY,
    2. Hogan DA,
    3. Mylonakis E
    . 2010. Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:340–349. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hogan DA,
    2. Kolter R
    . 2002. Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: an ecological role for virulence factors. Science 296:2229–2232. doi:10.1126/science.1070784.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brand A,
    2. Barnes JD,
    3. Mackenzie KS,
    4. Odds FC,
    5. Gow NA
    . 2008. Cell wall glycans and soluble factors determine the interactions between the hyphae of Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 287:48–55. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01301.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gibson J,
    2. Sood A,
    3. Hogan DA
    . 2009. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Candida albicans interactions: localization and fungal toxicity of a phenazine derivative. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:504–513. doi:10.1128/AEM.01037-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schlecht LM,
    2. Peters BM,
    3. Krom BP,
    4. Freiberg JA,
    5. Hansch GM,
    6. Filler SG,
    7. Jabra-Rizk MA,
    8. Shirtliff ME
    . 2015. Systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection mediated by Candida albicans hyphal invasion of mucosal tissue. Microbiology 161:168–181. doi:10.1099/mic.0.083485-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mahlen SD
    . 2011. Serratia infections: from military experiments to current practice. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:755–791. doi:10.1128/CMR.00017-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Vaaje-Kolstad G,
    2. Horn SJ,
    3. Sørlie M,
    4. Eijsink VG
    . 2013. The chitinolytic machinery of Serratia marcescens—a model system for enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides. FEBS J 280:3028–3049. doi:10.1111/febs.12181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ibrahim AS,
    2. Kontoyiannis DP
    . 2013. Update on mucormycosis pathogenesis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26:508–515. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mélida H,
    2. Sain D,
    3. Stajich JE,
    4. Bulone V
    . 2015. Deciphering the uniqueness of Mucoromycotina cell walls by combining biochemical and phylogenomic approaches. Environ Microbiol 17:1649–1662. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12601.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fichtman B,
    2. Shaulov L,
    3. Harel A
    . 2014. Imaging metazoan nuclear pore complexes by field emission scanning electron microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 122:41–58. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-417160-2.00002-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Soo PC,
    2. Wei JR,
    3. Horng YT,
    4. Hsieh SC,
    5. Ho SW,
    6. Lai HC
    . 2005. Characterization of the dapA-nlpB genetic locus involved in regulation of swarming motility, cell envelope architecture, hemolysin production, and cell attachment ability in Serratia marcescens. Infect Immun 73:6075–6084. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.9.6075-6084.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Givskov M,
    2. Eberl L,
    3. Christiansen G,
    4. Benedik MJ,
    5. Molin S
    . 1995. Induction of phospholipase- and flagellar synthesis in Serratia liquefaciens is controlled by expression of the flagellar master operon flhD. Mol Microbiol 15:445–454. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02258.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Di Venanzio G,
    2. Stepanenko TM,
    3. Garcia Véscovi E
    . 2014. Serratia marcescens ShlA pore-forming toxin is responsible for early induction of autophagy in host cells and is transcriptionally regulated by RcsB. Infect Immun 82:3542–3554. doi:10.1128/IAI.01682-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lin CS,
    2. Horng JT,
    3. Yang CH,
    4. Tsai YH,
    5. Su LH,
    6. Wei CF,
    7. Chen CC,
    8. Hsieh SC,
    9. Lu CC,
    10. Lai HC
    . 2010. RssAB-FlhDC-ShlBA as a major pathogenesis pathway in Serratia marcescens. Infect Immun 78:4870–4881. doi:10.1128/IAI.00661-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Shanks RM,
    2. Stella NA,
    3. Kalivoda EJ,
    4. Doe MR,
    5. O'Dee DM,
    6. Lathrop KL,
    7. Guo FL,
    8. Nau GJ
    . 2007. A Serratia marcescens OxyR homolog mediates surface attachment and biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 189:7262–7272. doi:10.1128/JB.00859-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hamilton JJ,
    2. Marlow VL,
    3. Owen RA,
    4. Costa MDAA,
    5. Guo M,
    6. Buchanan G,
    7. Chandra G,
    8. Trost M,
    9. Coulthurst SJ,
    10. Palmer T,
    11. Stanley-Wall NR,
    12. Sargent F
    . 2014. A holin and an endopeptidase are essential for chitinolytic protein secretion in Serratia marcescens. J Cell Biol 207:615–626. doi:10.1083/jcb.201404127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fedrigo GV,
    2. Campoy EM,
    3. Di Venanzio G,
    4. Colombo MI,
    5. Garcia Véscovi E
    . 2011. Serratia marcescens is able to survive and proliferate in autophagic-like vacuoles inside non-phagocytic cells. PLoS One 6:e24054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Tanikawa T,
    3. Sato Y,
    4. Nakagawa Y,
    5. Matsuyama T
    . 2005. Serratia marcescens gene required for surfactant serrawettin W1 production encodes putative aminolipid synthetase belonging to nonribosomal peptide synthetase family. Microbiol Immunol 49:303–310. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2005.tb03734.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pion M,
    2. Bshary R,
    3. Bindschedler S,
    4. Filippidou S,
    5. Wick LY,
    6. Job D,
    7. Junier P
    . 2013. Gains of bacterial flagellar motility in a fungal world. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6862–6867. doi:10.1128/AEM.01393-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Coburn B,
    2. Sekirov I,
    3. Finlay BB
    . 2007. Type III secretion systems and disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:535–549. doi:10.1128/CMR.00013-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Morales DK,
    2. Grahl N,
    3. Okegbe C,
    4. Dietrich LE,
    5. Jacobs NJ,
    6. Hogan DA
    . 2013. Control of Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazines. mBio 4(1):e00526-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00526-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.
    1. Bruna RE,
    2. Revale S,
    3. Garcia Vescovi E,
    4. Mariscotti JF
    . 2015. Draft whole-genome sequence of Serratia marcescens strain RM66262, isolated from a patient with a urinary tract infection. Genome Announc 3(6):e01423-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01423-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.
    1. Castelli ME,
    2. Fedrigo GV,
    3. Clementin AL,
    4. Ielmini MV,
    5. Feldman MF,
    6. Garcia Véscovi E
    . 2008. Enterobacterial common antigen integrity is a checkpoint for flagellar biogenesis in Serratia marcescens. J Bacteriol 190:213–220. doi:10.1128/JB.01348-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mechanisms of Bacterial (Serratia marcescens) Attachment to, Migration along, and Killing of Fungal Hyphae
Tal Hover, Tal Maya, Sapir Ron, Hani Sandovsky, Yana Shadkchan, Nitzan Kijner, Yulia Mitiagin, Boris Fichtman, Amnon Harel, Robert M. Q. Shanks, Roberto E. Bruna, Eleonora García-Véscovi, Nir Osherov
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Apr 2016, 82 (9) 2585-2594; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.04070-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mechanisms of Bacterial (Serratia marcescens) Attachment to, Migration along, and Killing of Fungal Hyphae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mechanisms of Bacterial (Serratia marcescens) Attachment to, Migration along, and Killing of Fungal Hyphae
Tal Hover, Tal Maya, Sapir Ron, Hani Sandovsky, Yana Shadkchan, Nitzan Kijner, Yulia Mitiagin, Boris Fichtman, Amnon Harel, Robert M. Q. Shanks, Roberto E. Bruna, Eleonora García-Véscovi, Nir Osherov
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Apr 2016, 82 (9) 2585-2594; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.04070-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336