Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Biotechnology

Transient MutS-Based Hypermutation System for Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus casei to Low pH

Tom J. Overbeck, Dennis L. Welker, Joanne E. Hughes, James L. Steele, Jeff R. Broadbent
Claire Vieille, Editor
Tom J. Overbeck
aDepartment of Nutrition Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis L. Welker
bDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne E. Hughes
bDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James L. Steele
cDepartment of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff R. Broadbent
aDepartment of Nutrition Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Vieille
Michigan State University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01120-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

This study explored transient inactivation of the gene encoding the DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS as a tool for adaptive evolution of Lactobacillus casei. MutS deletion derivatives of L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 were constructed and subjected to a 100-day adaptive evolution process to increase lactic acid resistance at low pH. Wild-type parental strains were also subjected to this treatment. At the end of the process, the ΔmutS lesion was repaired in representative L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 ΔmutS mutant isolates. Growth studies in broth at pH 4.0 (titrated with lactic acid) showed that all four adapted strains grew more rapidly, to higher cell densities, and produced significantly more lactic acid than untreated wild-type cells. However, the adapted ΔmutS derivative mutants showed the greatest increases in growth and lactic acid production. Further characterization of the L. casei 12A-adapted ΔmutS derivative revealed that it had a significantly smaller cell volume, a rougher cell surface, and significantly better survival at pH 2.5 than parental L. casei 12A. Genome sequence analysis confirmed that transient mutS inactivation decreased DNA replication fidelity in both L. casei strains, and it identified genetic changes that might contribute to the lactic acid-resistant phenotypes of adapted cells. Targeted inactivation of three genes that had acquired nonsense mutations in the adapted L. casei 12A ΔmutS mutant derivative showed that NADH dehydrogenase (ndh), phosphate transport ATP-binding protein PstB (pstB), and two-component signal transduction system (TCS) quorum-sensing histidine protein kinase (hpk) genes act in combination to increase lactic acid resistance in L. casei 12A.

IMPORTANCE Adaptive evolution has been applied to microorganisms to increase industrially desirable phenotypes, including acid resistance. We developed a method to increase the adaptability of Lactobacillus casei 12A and ATCC 334 through transient inactivation of the DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS. Here, we show this method was effective in increasing the resistance of L. casei to lactic acid at low pH. Additionally, we identified three genes that contribute to increased acid resistance in L. casei 12A. These results provide valuable insight on methods to enhance an organism's fitness to complex phenotypes through adaptive evolution and targeted gene inactivation.

INTRODUCTION

Genetic mutations can have various effects upon the fitness of an organism that may be classified as neutral, deleterious, or beneficial. Beneficial mutations confer a growth advantage in a specific environment and therefore increase an organism's fitness (1). In contrast, deleterious mutations decrease fitness, and these mutations typically occur at a substantially higher rate than beneficial mutations (2). To avoid deleterious mutations, the rate of genetic change in bacterial populations in stable environments is kept very low by mechanisms that ensure DNA replication and repair fidelity (3–5). However, increased mutational rates can be beneficial to bacterial populations under adverse conditions, where mutations might help cells overcome a selective pressure (2).

Cells with increased mutation rates (mutators) often occur as a small percentage of bacterial populations, and these cells display increased adaptability under stress conditions (6–8). Mutator phenotypes are attributed to mutations in DNA replication and repair enzymes (mutator alleles) (9, 10), with strong mutators observed in cells with a deficient mismatch repair (MMR) system (11–13). The MMR process is highly conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and ensures high DNA replication fidelity by correcting base pair mismatches, as well as small insertion or deletion loops (2). In Escherichia coli and other bacteria, MMR is initiated during DNA replication by the MutS enzyme, which recognizes and binds base pair mismatches in association with the β-clamp of the DNA polymerase, resulting in an ATP-dependent conformational change (14). This conformational change induces binding of the MutL protein and subsequent activation of the endonuclease MutH, allowing for excision of the mismatched base from the unmethylated daughter strand (14).

Adaptive laboratory evolution has been used to gain insight into the role that DNA replication and repair systems, such as MMR, have upon a microorganism's ability to evolve under specified growth conditions, and to select for “improved” strains with beneficial characteristics for biotechnological/industrial processes (13, 15, 16). The adaptive evolution process allows for the emergence of these improved strains, with increased tolerance to various defined stresses, by coupling the desired phenotype to growth (16).

Lactic acid is a valuable chemical with many versatile industrial applications and is commonly produced by microbial fermentations for the purpose of obtaining a high-yield chemically pure product. Our group is interested in the application of Lactobacillus casei as a biocatalyst for the industrial production of lactic acid. L. casei is an aciduric heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium that produces lactic acid as its major metabolic end product through carbohydrate fermentation. The cost for the industrial production of lactic acid from microorganisms, such as L. casei, can be significantly reduced if fermentations can be conducted at low pH, since lactic acid (pKa, 3.86) is more efficiently extracted in the undissociated form (17, 18). Like many other bacteria, survival of L. casei at low pH is enhanced by induction of an acid tolerance response (ATR) (19–21), and physiological characterization of this ATR has provided valuable insight for conducting L. casei fermentations at low pH (19, 20). Moreover, adaptive evolution has also been successfully used to increase lactic acid resistance in L. casei (22).

It was our hypothesis that the adaptive laboratory evolution of L. casei to complex phenotypes, such as increased lactic acid resistance at low pH, could be enhanced through the deliberate use of mutator cells. To test this idea, we developed a system for transient inactivation of mutS in L. casei and then performed adaptive evolution experiments to select for mutants that grew in broth adjusted to pH 4.0 with lactic acid. Mutants with the desired growth properties were isolated and, after restoration of mutS, the adapted strains were analyzed in more detail for genotypic and phenotypic changes. Genome resequencing confirmed that transient MutS inactivation decreased DNA replication fidelity and identified genetic changes that contribute to lactic acid resistance. Targeted mutagenesis confirmed a role for three genes in increased lactic acid resistance at low pH in L. casei 12A.

RESULTS

Adaptive evolution.To create L. casei mutator cells with decreased DNA replication fidelity, the DNA MMR gene mutS was deleted in its entirety from the L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 genomes via two-step gene replacement. DNA sequence analysis confirmed a deletion of the full mutS coding sequence (CDS) from the genomes of L. casei 12A and ATCC 334, which yielded mutator cells with impaired DNA mismatch repair for adaptive evolution experiments. The L. casei 12A ΔmutS and 334 ΔmutS mutant strains and wild-type (wt) L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 were then subjected to an adaptive evolution process that involved serial passage in de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) broth at decreasing pH (beginning with pH 5.5 and ending at pH 4.0, acidified with lactic acid) for a period of 100 days to select for derivatives with increased tolerance to lactic acid at low pH. At the end of the adaptive evolution process, seven lactic acid-tolerant isolates were collected from each of the four adapted strain suspensions, and the isolate from each of the four adapted strain suspensions which showed the highest growth rate in MRS broth at pH 4.0 was selected as the representative isolate. To restore functional MutS activity, the mutS lesion was repaired via two-step gene replacement in selected representatives for the L. casei 12A ΔmutS and 334 ΔmutS adaptive evolution isolates, generating strains L. casei 12A-MAE and 334-MAE, respectively, which were subjected to phenotypic and genotypic analyses.

Characterization of the acid-tolerant phenotype in adapted cells.The ability of the acid-adapted strains to grow at low pH was measured by growth studies in MRS at pH 4.0, adjusted with lactic acid. The results showed the wt-adapted strains (12A-AE and 334-AE) and the ΔmutS-adapted strains with the mutS lesion repaired (12A-MAE and 334-MAE) all grew significantly more rapidly and to a significantly higher final cell density than the respective unadapted parental strains (Fig. 1A and B). Moreover, L. casei 12A-MAE and 334-MAE grew significantly more rapidly and to significantly higher cell densities than L. casei 12A-AE and 334-AE, respectively (Fig. 1A and B). Additionally, significant decreases in pH and increases in total lactic acid production were observed with all four adapted strains compared to their parental L. casei wt (Fig. 1C and D). While the lowest pH values were observed in both MAE strains, the terminal pH of 12A-MAE was not significantly different from that of 12A-AE. However, both 12A-MAE and 334-MAE did produce significantly more lactic acid during the pH 4.0 growth experiment than any of the other strains (Fig. 1D).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Growth of the L. casei ATCC 334 (A) and 12A (B) parental wild-type strains (334 and 12A, respectively), the wild-type acid-adapted strains (334-AE and 12A-AE), and the ΔmutS acid-adapted derivatives (334-MAE and 12A-MAE) in MRS at pH 4.0, titrated with lactic acid, as well as the terminal pH (C) and lactic acid concentrations (D) after growth experiments. Error bars represent the standard errors of the means (SEM), and treatments with the same letter are not significantly different, from a minimum of two independent biological experimental replicates.

To determine whether the adaptive evolution process had also increased resistance to very low pH, early stationary-phase cells of L. casei 12A, 12A-AE, and 12A-MAE were challenged at pH 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 for 1 h. As shown in Fig. 2, a high percent survival by all three strains was observed at pH 3.0, and no survival was observed at pH 2.0. However, the results from pH 2.5 revealed a >10-fold increase in the percent survival of strain L. casei 12A-MAE compared to the parental L. casei 12A wt strain, while L. casei 12A-AE showed no detectable survival.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Percent survival of the L. casei 12A parental wild-type strain (12A), the wild-type acid-adapted strain (12A-AE), the ΔmutS acid-adapted derivative (12A-MAE), and deletion derivative 12A Δhpk, 12A ΔpstB, 12A Δndh, 12A Δhpk ΔpstB, 12A Δhpk Δndh, 12A Δndh ΔpstB, and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB Δndh mutants after acid challenge at pH 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 for 1 h. Error bars represent the SEM, and treatments with the same letter within a pH group are not significantly different, from two independent biological experimental replicates. X, no measurable CFU.

Additional phenotypic analysis of the L. casei 12A wt and 12A-MAE strains was performed to explore potential changes to cell morphology. Morphological examination by scanning electron microscopy of L. casei 12A and 12A-MAE cells collected from steady-state fermentations at pH 3.8 showed that L. casei 12A-MAE had a rougher cell surface than wt L. casei 12A cells (Fig. 3). Additionally, a significant decrease in both the length and width of the L. casei 12A-MAE cells was observed (1.25 ± 0.10 and 0.436 ± 0.010 μm, respectively) compared to L. casei 12A wt cells (1.60 ± 0.11 and 0.630 ± 0.014 μm, respectively).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Scanning electron microscope images of L. casei 12A parental wild-type cells (A and C) and 12A ΔmutS acid-adapted derivative (12A-MAE) cells (B and D). (A and B) Multiple cells are depicted, and the red boxes within these images represent the areas where images in panels C and D were captured, respectively. (C and D) Close examination of the cell surface.

Genotypic characterization of acid-tolerant mutants.Whole-genome resequencing of the acid-adapted strains was performed to identify genotypic changes that might contribute to the observed differences in the acid tolerance of the adapted strains. Whole-genome resequencing of L. casei ATCC 334 acid-adapted strains revealed that strain 334-MAE had accumulated over 1,000 mutations in the genome. Further analysis of these mutations revealed that several had occurred within genes for other DNA repair enzymes, with nonsense mutations occurring in three DNA repair enzymes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In contrast, sequencing of L. casei 12A-AE identified 19 mutations, of which 13 were within predicted open reading frames (ORFs). Three mutations were predicted to be silent, five mutations were predicted to result in an amino acid substitution, one mutation was predicted to result in the loss of a stop codon, and four mutations were predicted to introduce nonsense mutations (Table S2). Sequence data for L. casei 12A-MAE showed there was roughly a 3.3-fold increase in the number of mutations relative to strain 12A-AE, with 62 total mutations. Of these, 55 mutations were predicted to occur within ORFs, 18 mutations were predicted to be silent, 30 mutations were predicted to introduce an amino acid substitution, one mutation was predicted to result in the loss of a start codon, and six mutations were predicted to create nonsense mutations (Table S3). Surprisingly, no mutations were shared between L. casei 12A-AE and 12A-MAE or in the nonsense mutations found in 12A-MAE and 334-MAE. The nonsense mutations in 12A-AE and 12A-MAE all resulted from single-base-pair deletions. The six nonsense mutations identified in 12A-MAE affected genes encoding two 51-kDa hypothetical membrane proteins (hypI [LCA12A_2604] and hypII [LCA12A_0710]), sortase A (LPXTG specific, srtA [LCA12A_2465]), a NADH dehydrogenase (ndh [LCA12A_1744]), phosphate transport ATP-binding protein PstB (pstB [LCA12A_2227]), and a two-component signal transduction system (TCS) quorum-sensing histidine kinase (hpk [LCA12A_1895]). The presence of all six nonsense mutations in 12A-MAE was verified by DNA sequence analysis of site-specific PCR products. Interestingly, when the day 100 acid-adapted populations were screened for the presence of these six nonsense mutations, only the hypI, srtA, and ndh mutations were detected. Moreover, all three were evidenced as minor peaks within the DNA sequencing chromatograms, indicating that the mutations were present within a subset of the day 100 culture population.

To explore the relationship between some of the nonsense mutations and the phenotypic characteristics of L. casei 12A-MAE, we introduced single-, double-, and triple-gene deletions for hpk, pstB, and ndh in wt L. casei 12A. All seven deletion derivatives were successfully constructed and confirmed by DNA sequence analysis (Table 1). Growth studies with these derivatives in MRS at pH 4.0, titrated with lactic acid, showed that the L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutant had a significantly increased ability to grow at pH 4.0, compared to wt 12A (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutant also significantly decreased the final pH and increased lactic acid production relative to parental (wt) 12A. While the decrease in pH was not significantly different from that seen with 12A-MAE, the L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutant did produce significantly less lactic acid than 12A-MAE.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

(A and B) Growth of the L. casei 12A parental wild-type strain (12A), the 12A ΔmutS acid-adapted derivative (12A-MAE), and deletion derivative 12A Δhpk, 12A ΔpstB, 12A Δndh, 12A Δhpk ΔpstB, 12A Δhpk Δndh, 12A Δndh ΔpstB, and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB Δndh mutants in MRS at pH 4.0, titrated with lactic acid, as well as the terminal pH (C) and lactic acid concentrations (D) after growth experiments. Error bars represent the SEM, and treatments with the same letter are not significantly different, from a minimum of two independent biological experimental replicates.

The seven L. casei 12A deletion derivatives were also tested for their ability to survive a 1-h acid challenge at pH 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0. None of the strains exhibited any survival at pH 2.0 (Fig. 2). At pH 3.0, a significant decrease in the percent survival of the L. casei 12A Δhpk mutant was observed compared to wt L. casei 12A, while the other strains were not significantly different from the 12A wt or 12A Δhpk mutant strain. At pH 2.5, the L. casei 12A Δhpk ΔpstB mutant displayed significantly higher survival than any of the other deletion derivatives, as well as wt L. casei 12A, 12A-AE, and even 12A-MAE. The survival of the L. casei 12A Δhpk, 12A Δndh, and 12A Δhpk Δndh mutants was not significantly different from that of L. casei 12A-MAE, 12A, or 12A-AE.

The L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB mutant derivatives were examined for morphological changes by scanning electron microscopy, and no significant decreases in cell length or width (1.54 μm and 0.617 μm, and 1.58 μm and 0.651 μm, respectively) were observed for either deletion derivative, revealing that the inactivation of ndh, pstB, and hpk does not contribute to the observed decreased cell volume of L. casei 12A-MAE.

DISCUSSION

Under stressed conditions, hypermutability can be leveraged to increase an organism's fitness and achieve a desired phenotype through adaptive laboratory evolution (1–3). High mutation rates resulting from a deficient MMR process have been previously shown to increase the fitness of an organism in defined environments (13, 23). In this study, we explored the potential for coupling transient inactivation of the MMR process with adaptive evolution to obtain L. casei strains with increased lactic acid resistance at low pH. While both the wt and ΔmutS-adapted strains (AE and MAE, respectively) each evolved to grow significantly better than unadapted wt cells at low pH, genome resequencing of the mutants confirmed that mutS inactivation decreased DNA replication fidelity and yielded derivatives with a greater number of genetic changes (Table S2 and S3). Previous studies investigating the effect of inactive MMR on the mutation rate have shown increased mutation rates of 10- to 1,000-fold (12, 13, 23, 24). Our observed 3.3-fold increase in the number of mutations in L. casei 12A-MAE is lower than the rates previously reported. However, we believe this difference is explained by the differences between the methods used to identify mutations. In previous studies, the mutation rate was calculated for hypermutable cells using reversion assays (12, 13, 23, 24), whereas we determined the number of mutations using genome resequencing after the adaptive evolution process. We expect that many mutations not selected for under our strong selective pressure were incidentally filtered out during the extended adaptive evolution process, reducing the final number of mutations observed in L. casei 12A-MAE.

Interestingly, genome sequence data for L. casei 334-MAE revealed a substantially higher number of mutations than were found in L. casei 12A-MAE. Examination of these mutations showed that many had occurred in genes for other DNA repair enzymes, which suggested that the high number of mutations observed in L. casei 334-MAE is likely a result of even lower DNA replication fidelity during the adaptive evolution process. Growth studies in MRS at pH 4.0 show that wt L. casei ATCC 334 is inherently less tolerant to low pH than L. casei 12A (Fig. 1A and B). Since hypermutability may increase cell adaptability under stressed conditions (7), it is possible that the additional decrease in replication fidelity observed in L. casei 334-MAE created a strong hypermutable background that enabled adaptation to low pH. However, the L. casei 334-MAE genome sequence illustrates one possible risk of using MutS as a target for inducing transient hypermutation, i.e., restoration of the mutS gene in this strain would not restore replication fidelity, and so the strain would likely not provide a stable platform for the industrial production of lactic acid.

Given the lack of genomic stability in L. casei 334-MAE and the finding that growth and lactic acid production at low pH by L. casei 12A derivatives were superior, we selected the L. casei 12A derivative strains for more detailed characterization. Growth studies after adaptive evolution confirmed that the laboratory-derived mutator cells (ΔmutS) yielded L. casei 12A mutants (12A-MAE) with significantly better growth and lactic acid production at pH 4.0 than L. casei 12A wt-adapted cells (12A-AE) (Fig. 1B to D). Genome resequencing showed these two strains had acquired different sets of mutations, and acid challenge studies revealed other phenotypic differences. The L. casei 12A-MAE strain had significantly better survival at pH 2.5 versus wt cells, while the 12A-AE strain had significantly reduced survival relative to wt L. casei 12A wt (Fig. 2). Thus, L. casei 12A-MAE appears to have accrued beneficial mutations during the adaptive evolution process with respect to survival at pH 2.5, while L. casei 12A-AE apparently acquired mutations that were deleterious for that environment. This finding also shows that while a desired phenotype, such as growth at low pH, can successfully be selected for using adaptive evolution, undesirable outcomes in other associated phenotypes, such as survival at low pH, can incidentally emerge from the process.

Previous studies on adaptive evolution (22, 25) and adaptation to lactic acid stress (26–28) have sometimes revealed changes to the cell surface and reduced cell volume. We observed similar changes to L. casei 12A-MAE compared to wt L. casei 12A (Fig. 3). Decreased cell volume is sometimes associated with a diminished growth rate resulting from nutrient limitations (29–32), but this likely does not explain the differences observed here, since L. casei 12A and 12A-MAE cells were grown in the same medium and under the same conditions. Alternatively, it is possible that a decrease in cell volume by L. casei 12A-MAE may allow this strain to better combat acid stress by reducing the volume of intracellular space to buffer and/or increasing the concentration of intracellular enzymes involved in acid resistance. However, the genetic basis for the observed decrease in cell volume remains unclear.

To better explore the genetic basis for the lactic acid-resistant phenotype of L. casei 12A-MAE, we screened the final L. casei 12A ΔmutS-adapted culture for each of the six nonsense mutations identified in L. casei 12A-MAE. Only the nonsense mutations in hypI, srtA, and ndh were detected in sequencing chromatograms from the population of cells, but this finding does not preclude the possibility that mutations to hypII, pstB, and hpk were present in a smaller subset of the final L. casei 12A ΔmutS-adapted culture (and so were not apparent in the sequencing chromatograms). Since all six nonsense mutations were present in L. casei 12A-MAE, we targeted three genes for further study: pstB, hpk, and ndh. The pstB gene is located within a phosphate (Pho) regulon, controlled by a TCS, and the hpk gene is part of a TCS located within a bacteriocin gene cluster. These genes were chosen because of their roles in signal transduction pathways (33, 34), while the ndh gene was chosen because its nonsense mutation was detected in the final 12A ΔmutS-adapted culture.

Growth studies with seven single-, double-, and triple-deletion mutants in MRS at pH 4.0 revealed that the combined deletion of pstB and ndh (12A Δndh ΔpstB) increased growth and significantly increased the ability of L. casei 12A to produce lactic acid at pH 4.0 (Fig. 4B to D). No enhancement of growth or lactic acid production was observed with any of the other deletion mutants (Fig. 4). Similarly, acid challenge tests showed that the L. casei 12A Δhpk ΔpstB double mutant had significantly improved survival at pH 2.5, even compared to L. casei 12A-MAE (Fig. 2). Improved survival at pH 2.5 relative to wt L. casei 12A was not observed for any of the other deletion constructs. Our discovery that one pstB double mutant improved growth and lactic acid production at low pH, while another improved survival at pH 2.5, indicated that the Pho regulon may influence both phenotypes. Our findings also demonstrate that the physiological basis for these two phenotypes does not fully overlap.

The Pho regulon is responsible for inorganic phosphate (Pi) uptake by Pst proteins and is controlled by a TCS in all bacteria containing a Pho regulon characterized to date (33, 35). Studies of Escherichia coli have revealed that this regulon is not only important for the regulation of phosphate uptake but also affects genes involved in virulence and pathogenesis, secondary metabolite production, nutritional regulation, and stress responses, including the ATR (35–38). The Pho regulon in E. coli is tied to the expression of acid shock proteins (39, 40), sigma factors (35, 37, 38), chaperones (38), and acid resistance systems, including glutamate-dependent acid resistance (GDAR) (38). The inactivation of pst in E. coli upregulates the Pho regulon and increases the expression of genes involved in the ATR (38). Inactivation of the TCS (TC04) from the L. casei Pho regulon in strain BL23 resulted in a decreased ability to grow at pH 3.75 and increased tolerance to antibiotics that target the cell envelope (nisin and bacitracin) (41). The authors of the study with those findings concluded that the L. casei BL23 Pho regulon is involved in cell envelope stress tolerance (41). Additionally, cross talk with other TCSs involved in secondary metabolite production, such as bacteriocins, is a common feature of the Pho regulon (35). The inactivation of pstB alone did not have any detectable effect on growth and lactic acid production by L. casei 12A at pH 4.0 or on survival at pH 2.5 (Fig. 4A). However, characterization of the 12A Δhpk ΔpstB and 12A Δndh ΔpstB double mutants shows that the Pho regulon is tied to these phenotypes (see above). Moreover, our finding that the 12A Δhpk ΔpstB double mutant had increased survival at pH 2.5 suggests potential cross talk between the 12A Pho regulon and at least one TCS quorum-sensing histidine protein kinase (HPK [hpk gene]).

The ability to sense and respond to extracellular stresses is essential for bacterial survival under adverse conditions, such as low pH. In lactobacilli and other Gram-positive organisms, TCSs composed of an HPK and response regulator often serve as stress sensors and induce the expression of genes that enhance cells' ability to survive (41–45). The HPKs in Gram-positive bacteria are usually part of the HPK10 subfamily (46, 47), some of which participate in quorum sensing through the recognition of an inducing peptide pheromone, and they subsequently induce regulation of bacteriocin operons (46, 47). The hpk gene of L. casei 12A is 1,299 bp in length, belongs to the HPK10 subfamily, and has a 95% DNA and 94% amino acid sequence similarity (with 100% sequence similarity in the conserved H, N, and G regions) to the HPK Prck in L. paracasei E93490 (46). The 3′ end of the L. casei 12A hpk gene (432 amino acids), which contains the H, N, and G regions, is also highly similar (95% DNA and 98.6% amino acid sequence similarity) to a smaller HPK10 (280 amino acids) in the TC13 system in L. casei BL23 (41), which is also located within the same quorum sensing bacteriocin gene cluster. The inactivation of TC13 in L. casei BL23 decreased the ability to grow at pH 3.75 (41). Growth studies with the L. casei 12A Δhpk mutant at pH 4.0 show that this strain also grew more poorly than the wt L. casei 12A over most of the assay, but it ultimately did reach a significantly higher final cell density (Fig. 4A). However, the terminal pH for the L. casei 12A Δhpk mutant was significantly higher than that of the wt L. casei 12A. Our findings also show that the inactivation of hpk and pstB together can significantly increase survival at pH 2.5, so the role of this TCS in acid adaptation remains unclear.

NAD is a cofactor in essential biological processes, and Lactobacillus casei 12A contains two potential NADH dehydrogenases: the one targeted here and another located in cluster with a putative pheromone precursor. The ratio of NAD+ to NADH plays an important role in regulating the intracellular redox state and the metabolism of cells (48, 49). Metabolism of carbon sources (e.g., glucose) during growth results in the reduction of NAD+ to NADH. To maintain growth, NAD+ must be regenerated through the oxidation of NADH. This can be accomplished by coupling the oxidation of NADH to the reduction of metabolic intermediates (i.e., fermentation) (50) or through the reduction of terminal electron acceptors by NADH dehydrogenases (51, 52). Propionibacterium acidipropionici mutants adapted to increased propionic acid levels with decreased NADH dehydrogenase expression (53) showed an increased NAD+-to-NADH ratio at low pH (54). Additionally, NAD+ is an essential cofactor for DNA ligases in all bacteria and is involved in DNA replication, recombination, and repair reactions (55–57). While the inactivation of ndh alone had no detected influence on growth or lactic acid production at pH 4.0 by L. casei 12A, this phenotype was observed in the L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB double mutant. That finding suggests that an altered NAD+/NADH ratio may contribute to increased growth and lactic acid production at low pH.

In summary, we have demonstrated that transient MutS inactivation can be effectively combined with adaptive evolution to select for L. casei mutants with complex phenotypes, such as lactic acid resistance. Genome resequencing confirmed that mutS inactivation decreased DNA replication fidelity during the adaptive evolution process and yielded mutants with significantly better growth and lactic acid production at low pH than with adapted wt cells. However, hypermutation in the L. casei 334 ΔmutS mutant showed the potential of this approach to affect other genes associated with replication fidelity and prevent the restoration of a stable genotype. Genome resequencing and directed mutagenesis also revealed that inactivation of an NADH dehydrogenase (ndh gene) and phosphate transport ATP-binding protein PstB (pstB gene) can increase the ability of L. casei 12A to grow and produce lactic acid at pH 4.0. Additionally, the survival of L. casei 12A at pH 2.5 can be increased by the inactivation of a two-component signal transduction system (TCS) quorum-sensing HPK (hpk) and pstB. Future studies to investigate additional mutations identified in our L. casei-adapted strains, and how these mutations affect gene expression in L. casei, would increase the basic understanding of how these cells are better able to grow and produce lactic acid at low pH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. L. casei and E. coli strains were maintained in a laboratory culture collection at −80°C in 15% glycerol stocks. L. casei strains were propagated without aeration at 37°C in MRS broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) with 2.5 μg/ml erythromycin (Ery), when appropriate. E. coli strains were propagated with aeration at 200 rpm and 37°C in LB broth (Difco Laboratories), with 50 μg/ml ampicillin (Amp) or 100 μg/ml Ery, when appropriate.

Gene deletions.A list of the PCR primers used to construct recombinant plasmids for gene deletions is provided in Table 2. The isolation of L. casei genomic DNA and partial or complete gene deletions were performed using methods described previously (58). The mutS gene (2.58 kb) was deleted in its entirety from the L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 genomes. Briefly, 5′ and 3′ fragments upstream and downstream, respectively, of the mutS gene were first obtained by PCR amplification of L. casei 12A genomic DNA using the Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). A 960-bp 5′ fragment was obtained with primers mut5′-f and mut5′-r, which contain XbaI and PstI restriction linkers, respectively, while a 1,210-bp 3′ fragment was obtained with primers mut3′-f and mut3′-r, which contain PstI and XmaI linkers, respectively. The ends of the 5′ and 3′ PCR products were filled with Taq DNA polymerase master mix (5 PRIME, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), separately blunt-end ligated into the cloning vector pGEM-T (Promega, Inc., Madison, WI), and transformed by electroporation into E. coli DH5α. Transformants were selected on LB with 50 μg/ml ampicillin, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal), and isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and then plasmid DNA (pDNA) was collected from ampicillin-resistant (Ampr) colonies and screened by restriction enzyme digestion (XbaI and PstI or PstI and XmaI) to confirm the presence of appropriately sized insert DNA. Inserts from positive clones were extracted from preparatory agarose gels, and then a triple ligation mix, including digested 5′ and 3′ inserts, was assembled into the multiple-cloning site (MCS) of the XbaI- and XmaI-digested vector pBS1 (58).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Primers used in this study

The ligated DNA was transformed into E. coli EC1000, and transformants were selected on LB with 100 μg/ml Ery. Recombinant plasmid DNA (pDNA) in erythromycin-resistant (Eryr) colonies was screened by PCR and restriction enzyme digestion and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The recombinant plasmid, designated pBSΔmutS, was transformed as described previously (59) into L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 competent cells, prepared by growth in MRS with 1% glycine and 0.9 M NaCl, respectively, to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) between 0.6 and 0.8, and pretreated with sterile distilled water (dH2O) for 30 min. Electroporation was performed in 2-mm cuvettes using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (Hercules, CA) set at 2,500 V, 25 μF, and 400 Ω. Electroporated cells were recovered in MRS with 0.5 M sucrose and plated onto MRS with 2.5 μg/m Ery (59).

Genomic DNA from L. casei Eryr colonies was isolated then screened by PCR using the primers mut1 and mut3 to identify merodiploids with pBSΔmutS integrated into the wt mutS locus by a single-crossover event (which produced products for both the wt mutS [4.0-kb amplicon] and the ΔmutS [1.5-kb amplicon] loci). Merodiploids were passaged by 1% (vol/vol) transfers in MRS without antibiotic selection and plated onto brain heart infusion (BHI; Becton-Dickinson) with 7 mM 4-chloro-dl-phenylalanine (ClPhe; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), as previously described (58). To screen for colonies that had lost mutS, PCR was performed with primers mut1 and mut3. DNA sequencing from the 5′-flanking DNA upstream of the deletion site to a point downstream using primers mut1 and mut3, and from the 3′-flanking DNA downstream of the deletion site to a point upstream using primers mut2 and mut7, was used to confirm the deletion of mutS in its entirety from the genomes of L. casei 12A and ATCC 334 (58).

The L. casei 12A genes encoding a two-component signal transduction system (TCS) quorum-sensing histidine kinase (hpk [LCA12A_1895]), phosphate transport ATP-binding protein PstB (pstB [LCA12A_2227]), and NADH dehydrogenase (ndh [LCA12A_1744]) were inactivated by gene replacement using a similar approach. To generate a 1,307-bp deletion that removed the entire hpk ORF, a 550-bp 5′ fragment was obtained with primers hpk2 and hpk3, which contain BamHI and HindIII restriction linkers, respectively, and a 599-bp 3′ fragment was obtained with primers hpk4 and hpk5, which contain HindIII and XmaI linkers, respectively. The 5′ and 3′ fragments were cloned and verified in pGEM-T and assembled in pBS1, and the resulting recombinant plasmid pBSΔhpk was transformed into L. casei 12A, as described for mutS. Screening of DNA from L. casei Eryr colonies was performed by PCR with primers hpk1 and hpk6 to identify merodiploids (which gave products for both the wt hpk [2.6-kb amplicon] and the Δhpk [1.3-kb amplicon] loci). Nonselective passage and screening for the wt hpk or Δhpk locus in isolates were performed as described for mutS with the primers hpk1 and hpk6. DNA sequencing from the 5′-flanking DNA upstream of the deletion to a point downstream from the 3′-flanking DNA was used to confirm full deletion of the hpk ORF in the L. casei 12A Δhpk mutant.

To excise the entire pstB ORF (774 bp), a 1,064-bp 5′ fragment was generated with primers pst1 and pst2, which contain XbaI and EcoRI restriction linkers, respectively, and a 1,084-bp 3′ fragment was obtained with primers pst3 and pst4, which contain EcoRI and SphI linkers, respectively. The 5′ and 3′ fragments were cloned and verified in pGEM-T and assembled in pBS1, and the recombinant plasmid pBSΔpstB was transformed into L. casei 12A, as described for mutS. Screening of DNA from L. casei Eryr colonies for merodiploids was performed by PCR with primers pst5 and pst8 (which gave products for both the wt pstB [1-kb amplicon] and the ΔpstB [200-bp amplicon] loci). Nonselective passage and subsequent screening for the wt pstB or ΔpstB locus were performed with primers pst6 and pst7. DNA sequencing from the 5′-flanking DNA upstream of the deletion to a point downstream from the 3′-flanking DNA using primers pst1 and pst6 was used to confirm full deletion of the pstB CDS in the L. casei 12A ΔpstB mutant.

A 561-bp (amino acids 19 to 205) in-frame deletion of the ndh ORF in L. casei 12A was generated using an 824-bp 5′ fragment obtained with primers ndh2 and ndh3, which contain BamHI and HindIII restriction linkers, respectively, and a 742-bp 3′ fragment obtained with primers ndh4 and ndh5, which contain HindIII and EcoRI linkers, respectively. The 5′ and 3′ fragments were cloned into E. coli DH5α using pGEM-T, in E. coli EC1000 using pBS1, and in L. casei 12A, using the recombinant pBSΔndh, as described for mutS. Screening of DNA from L. casei Eryr colonies was performed by PCR with the primers ndh1 and ndh8 to identify merodiploids (which gave products for both the wt ndh [1.6-kb amplicon] and the Δndh [1.1-kb amplicon] loci). Nonselective passage and subsequent screening for the wt ndh or Δndh locus were performed with the primers ndh1 and ndh8, and DNA sequencing from the 5′-flanking DNA upstream of the deletion to a point downstream from the 3′-flanking DNA confirmed that the desired in-frame deletion was present in the ndh CDS of the L. casei 12A Δndh mutant.

Finally, the hpk, pstB, and ndh genes were deleted in combination to generate a total of seven L. casei 12A double- and triple-gene-deletion mutants (Table 1). The pstB gene was inactivated in the L. casei 12A Δhpk and L. casei 12A Δndh mutants, resulting in L. casei 12A Δhpk ΔpstB and L. casei 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutants, respectively. The ndh gene was inactivated in the L. casei 12A Δhpk and L. casei 12A Δhpk ΔpstB mutants, resulting in L. casei 12A Δhpk Δndh and L. casei 12A Δhpk ΔpstB Δndh mutants, respectively.

Adaptive evolution.The approach in this study used for adaptive evolution of L. casei to low pH was based upon the work of Zhang et al. (22). The adjustment of pH in MRS broth below the standard pH 6.5 was attained by addition of 85% lactic acid (MP Biomedicals LLC, Solon, OH). Working cultures of L. casei 12A, 12A ΔmutS mutant, ATCC 334, and 334 ΔmutS mutant strains were prepared by direct inoculation of 10 ml of MRS broth from glycerol stocks with incubation at 37°C for 17 h, followed by transfer (1% [vol/vol]) into 10 ml of MRS (pH 5.5) (day 0 cultures). Cultures were incubated at 37°C and continuously transferred at mid-exponential phase (OD600, 2.0 to 3.0) to fresh MRS (pH 5.5) over a period of 10 days, and then MRS at pH 5.0 for 15 days, MRS at pH 4.5 for 20 days, MRS at pH 4.2 for 25 days, and finally, MRS at pH 4.0 for 30 days. During the 100-day adaptive evolution process, samples were collected approximately every 5 days and preserved at −80°C as glycerol stocks, with occasional PCR screening of mutS as described for ΔmutS construction to verify culture purity during the experiment.

At the end of the adaptive evolution process, all four cultures were streaked onto MRS plates at pH 4.0 titrated with 85% lactic acid and incubated in BBL GasPak system with a GasPak EZ anaerobe container system with indicator (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Dublin, Ireland) at 37°C for 20 days. After incubation, the seven largest colonies from each culture were collected and subjected to growth studies in MRS broth at pH 4.0 (see below), and the isolate from each adaptive evolution culture with the highest growth rate at pH 4.0 was selected for further characterization.

Growth at pH 4.0.Working cultures of the seven isolates collected from each of the final four adaptive evolution cultures were prepared by a 1% (vol/vol) inoculation of 1 ml of MRS broth from glycerol stocks, with incubation at 37°C for 17 h to allow cultures to attain early stationary phase. Working cultures of L. casei ATCC 334, 334-AE, 334-MAE, 12A, 12A-AE, 12A-MAE and 12A Δhpk, 12A ΔpstB, 12A Δndh, 12A Δhpk ΔpstB, 12A Δhpk Δndh, 12A Δndh ΔpstB, and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB Δndh mutants were prepared from glycerol stocks, followed by successive 1% (vol/vol) transfer in 10 ml of MRS and 1 ml of MRS, respectively, with incubation at 37°C for 17 h. Cells were harvested from 1-ml cultures by centrifugation (14 × 103 rpm, 5 min), washed once with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and suspended in 1 ml of MRS, adjusted to pH 4.0. These suspensions were used to inoculate (1% [vol/vol]) 0.2 ml of MRS broth (pH 4.0), in Costar 96-well flat-bottom assay plates with a low-evaporation lid (Corning, Inc., Kennebunk, ME). At least three wells were left uninoculated to serve as blanks throughout the growth curve experiments. The outer wells of the 96-well plates contained 0.2 ml of sterile dH2O. After inoculation, the plates were capped with radiation-sterilized adhesive seals (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and incubated at 37°C. The OD600 was measured every 24 h for 17 days using a SpectraMax Plus 384 microplate reader (Molecular Devices LLC, Sunnyvale, CA) at 37°C with 1 min automixing before each measurement. Growth curves of L. casei strains were assembled using data from a minimum of two independent biological experimental replicates.

The terminal pH and d/l-lactic acid concentration were measured after the 17-day experiment for each L. casei strain tested and compared to the measured blank values. At the end of the growth experiment, cultures were transferred from wells to 1.7-ml microtubes and centrifuged at 14 × 103 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to 0.5-ml PCR tubes and stored at −20°C until the assay was performed. At that time, the solution was thawed, and the pH was measured using an Orion 3 Star benchtop pH meter (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) with an EasyFerm Plus K8 160 pH probe (Hamilton Robotics, Reno, NV). Quantitative d/l-lactic acid analyses were performed using the R-Biopharm AG (Darmstadt, Germany) d/l-lactic acid UV-method test kit, as directed by supplier, except that the total assay volume was reduced from 1 to 0.5 ml while maintaining the proportions of reagents described in manufacturer's instructions. A Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welch q-test (REGWQ) for multiple pairwise comparisons was used to identify statistically significant differences in pH values and lactic acid yields from each treatment (60).

Restoration of mutS.The mutS lesion in each of the L. casei 12A ΔmutS and 334 ΔmutS acid-evolved representative isolates was repaired to restore DNA replication fidelity. A 4.8-kb fragment spanning 1 kb upstream to 1.2 kb downstream of mutS was obtained by Phusion PCR of L. casei 12A genomic DNA with the primers mut5′-f and mut3′-r, with XbaI and XmaI linkers, respectively, and cloned into E. coli DH5α using pGEM-T, and in E. coli EC1000 using pBS1, as previously described (58). The recombinant plasmid, pBS1:mutS, was transformed into L. casei 12A ΔmutS and 334 ΔmutS mutants, and screening of L. casei Eryr colonies for merodiploids, nonselective passage, and screening for the presence of the restored mutS gene were performed essentially as described for the construction of knockout mutants. DNA sequencing from the 5′-flanking DNA upstream of mutS to a point 2.3 kb downstream, using primers mut1 and mut4, from the 3′-flanking DNA downstream of mutS to a point 3 kb upstream, using primers mut5 and mut7, and an overlapping 2.9-kb region, across mutS using primers mut6 and mut3, was used to confirm complete restoration of mutS in the genome of each strain.

Acid resistance.Working cultures of L. casei strains were prepared as described for the growth studies and then inoculated (1% [vol/vol]) into 15 ml of MRS broth and incubated at 37°C for 11 h until the cells reached early stationary phase. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (9 × 103 × g, 10 min, 25°C), washed once with 15 ml of 0.1% Bacto peptone-buffered solution (pH 6.5), and then suspended in 1.45 ml of Bacto peptone (approximately 1010 CFU/ml). A 0.1-ml aliquot of the cell suspension was transferred to 10 ml of MRS broth without dextrose at pH 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 (adjusted with HCl) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Before and after the acid challenge, cells were serially diluted and plated on MRS agar and incubated for 48 h at 37°C, and the difference in cell count was used to calculate the percent survival. Two independent biological experimental replicates of the acid resistance experiment were conducted. An REGWQ for multiple pairwise comparisons was used to identify statistically significant differences in the percent survival at each pH value.

Cell morphology.The morphologies of the L. casei 12A, 12A-MAE, 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutant, and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB mutant strains were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. Working cultures were prepared as described for adaptive evolution. Batch cultures in 1 liter of MRS with 3% glucose broth in Sartorius Biostat B-plus dual-controlled biofermenters (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany) were prepared using a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum of working cultures standardized to an OD600 of 1.0 in MRS. Cultures were incubated at 37°C with an agitation rate of 100 rpm, and when pH 3.8 was reached, it was maintained at that level by automatic addition of 15% (vol/vol) NH4OH. A 1-ml sample of cells was collected after 30 h and centrifuged at 800 rpm for 25 min, and the supernatant was discarded. For biological fixation of the samples, 0.75 ml of buffered glutaraldehyde (2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M HEPES) was added to the cell pellets, followed by vortexing and incubation overnight at room temperature. Cells were transferred to glass slides (120 mm) coated with lysine, rinsed with 0.1 M HEPES three times for 5 min, and serially dehydrated with ethanol (2 times for 10 min in 50% ethanol, 2 times for 10 min in 70% ethanol, 2 times for 10 min in 95% ethanol, and then 3 times for 15 min in 100% ethanol). After rinsing, the slides were chemically dried with ethanol (100%):Bis(trimethylsilyl)amine (HMDS) solutions (2:1 for 15 min, 1:1 for 15 min, 1:2 for 15 min, and 0:1 3 times for 15 min). The HMDS in the final step was removed by evaporation overnight at room temperature, and then the fixed cells were mounted onto aluminum stubs and Au/Pd sputter-coated with an EMS-150 ES carbon/metal coater (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) as a service by the USU Microscopy Core Facility. Cells were imaged and photographed using a FEI Quanta FEG 650 scanning electron microscope (Hillsboro, OR) under high vacuum.

For analysis of cell size, ImageJ (61) was used to measure the width and length of 35 individual L. casei 12A, 12A-MAE, 12A Δndh ΔpstB mutant, and 12A Δhpk ΔpstB mutant cells, using methods described by Kokkinosa et al. (62). An REGWQ for multiple pairwise comparisons was used to identify statistically significant differences in cell length and width from each treatment.

Whole-genome resequencing.Genomic DNA was extracted using the MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI), following the provided procedure, with the addition of 5 U/ml mutanolysin from Streptomyces globisporus ATCC 21553 (Sigma) to the Ready-Lyse lysozyme solution step (37°C, 1 h). Genomic DNA was sequenced as a service by the Utah State University Center for Integrated Biosystems (USU CIB) using an Ion Torrent system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Sequence contigs were assembled against the respective wt L. casei ATCC 334 and 12A reference genomes (GenBank accession numbers CP000423 and CP006690 , respectively) and analyzed for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions and deletions, and copy number variations using the Ion Reporter software, as a service by the USU CIB. Identified mutations were referenced against 12A population sequencing data with regions previously determined to be hypervariable in the L. casei wt genome (T. Overbeck, J. L. Steele, and J. R. Broadbent, unpublished data) and were excluded from the mutational analysis if they occurred within these regions. Mutations with a coverage depth greater than 10× and a frequency greater than 90% were considered genuine. Mutations occurring within annotated open reading frames (ORFs) were subsequently analyzed for their putative effect on translation. Six nonsense mutations identified in L. casei 12A-MAE (in hypI, srtA, pstB, hypII, hpk, and ndh genes) were verified in L. casei 12A-MAE and in 100-day L. casei 12A ΔmutS culture by sequencing PCR products generated with the primers hypI-f and hypI-r, srtA-f and srtA-r, pstB-f and pstB-r, hypII-f and hypII-r, 3hpk-f and 3hpk-r, and ndh-f and ndh-r (Table 2).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant 2011-67009-30043 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and by the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station.

We thank Fen-Ann Shen of the USU-MCF for assistance with scanning electron microscopy.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 18 May 2017.
    • Accepted 1 August 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 11 August 2017.
  • This study is Utah Agricultural Experiment Station journal paper no. 8994.

  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01120-17 .

  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Foster PL
    . 2000. Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution. Bioessays22:1067–1074. doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1067::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-Q.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Denamur E,
    2. Matic I
    . 2006. Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria. Mol Microbiol60:820–827. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05150.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Giraud A,
    2. Matic I,
    3. Tenaillon O,
    4. Clara A,
    5. Radman M,
    6. Fons M,
    7. Taddei F
    . 2001. Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in the mouse gut. Science291:2606–2608. doi:10.1126/science.1056421.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kondrashov AS
    . 1995. Modifiers of mutation-selection balance: general approach and the evolution of mutation rates. Genet Res66:53–69. doi:10.1017/S001667230003439X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Negishi K,
    2. Loakes D,
    3. Schaaper RM
    . 2002. Saturation of DNA mismatch repair and error catastrophe by a base analogue in Escherichia coli. Genetics161:1363–1371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bjedov I,
    2. Tenaillon O,
    3. Gérard B,
    4. Souza V,
    5. Denamur E,
    6. Radman M,
    7. Taddei F,
    8. Matic I
    . 2003. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Science300:1404–1409. doi:10.1126/science.1082240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Galhardo RS,
    2. Hastings PJ,
    3. Rosenberg SM
    . 2007. Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol42:399–435. doi:10.1080/10409230701648502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sniegowski PD,
    2. Gerrish PJ,
    3. Lenski RE
    . 1997. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature387:703–705. doi:10.1038/42701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Debora BN,
    2. Vidales LE,
    3. Ramírez R,
    4. Ramírez M,
    5. Robleto EA,
    6. Yasbin RE,
    7. Pedraza-Reyes M
    . 2011. Mismatch repair modulation of MutY activity drives Bacillus subtilis stationary-phase mutagenesis. J Bacteriol193:236–245. doi:10.1128/JB.00940-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Loh E,
    2. Salk JJ,
    3. Loeb LA
    . 2010. Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A107:1154–1159. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912451107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Oliver A,
    2. Baquero F,
    3. Blázquez J
    . 2002. The mismatch repair system (mutS, mutL and uvrD genes) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: molecular characterization of naturally occurring mutants. Mol Microbiol43:1641–1650. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02855.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rosche WA,
    2. Foster PL
    . 1999. The role of transient hypermutators in adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A96:6862–6867. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.6862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zhu L,
    2. Cai Z,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Li Y
    . 2014. Engineering stress tolerance of Escherichia coli by stress-induced mutagenesis (SIM)-based adaptive evolution. Biotechnol J9:120–127. doi:10.1002/biot.201300277.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kunkel TA,
    2. Erie DA
    . 2005. DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem74:681–710. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dragosits M,
    2. Mattanovich D
    . 2013. Adaptive laboratory evolution–principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact12:64. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zelder O,
    2. Hauer B
    . 2000. Environmentally directed mutations and their impact on industrial biotransformation and fermentation processes. Curr Opin Microbiol3:248–251. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00084-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. John RP,
    2. Nampoothiri KM,
    3. Pandey A
    . 2007. Fermentative production of lactic acid from biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol74:524–534. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0779-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vijayakumar J,
    2. Aravindan R,
    3. Viruthagiri T
    . 2008. Recent trends in the production, purification and application of lactic acid. Chem Biochem Eng Q22:245.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Broadbent JR,
    2. Larsen RL,
    3. Deibel V,
    4. Steele JL
    . 2010. Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress. J Bacteriol192:2445–2458. doi:10.1128/JB.01618-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fozo EM,
    2. Kajfasz JK,
    3. Quivey RG Jr
    . 2004. Low pH-induced membrane fatty acid alterations in oral bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett238:291–295. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09769.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Curran TM,
    3. Marquis RE
    . 1997. Rapid procedure for acid adaptation of oral lactic-acid bacteria and further characterization of the response. Can J Microbiol43:143–148. doi:10.1139/m97-019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Du G,
    4. Chen J
    . 2012. Enhanced acid tolerance in Lactobacillus casei by adaptive evolution and compared stress response during acid stress. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng17:283–289. doi:10.1007/s12257-011-0346-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Luan G,
    2. Cai Z,
    3. Gong F,
    4. Dong H,
    5. Lin Z,
    6. Zhang Y,
    7. Li Y
    . 2013. Developing controllable hypermutable Clostridium cells through manipulating its methyl-directed mismatch repair system. Protein Cell4:854–862. doi:10.1007/s13238-013-3079-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Marcobal AM,
    2. Sela DA,
    3. Wolf YI,
    4. Makarova KS,
    5. Mills DA
    . 2008. Role of hypermutability in the evolution of the genus Oenococcus. J Bacteriol190:564–570. doi:10.1128/JB.01457-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jansen MLA,
    2. Diderich JA,
    3. Mashego M,
    4. Hassane A,
    5. de Winde JH,
    6. Daran-Lapujade P,
    7. Pronk JT
    . 2005. Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. Microbiology151:1657–1669. doi:10.1099/mic.0.27577-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pieterse B,
    2. Leer RJ,
    3. Schuren FHJ,
    4. van der Werf MJ
    . 2005. Unravelling the multiple effects of lactic acid stress on Lactobacillus plantarum by transcription profiling. Microbiology151:3881–3894. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28304-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ingham CJ,
    2. Beerthuyzen M,
    3. van Hylckama Vlieg J
    . 2008. Population heterogeneity of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 microcolonies in response to and recovery from acid stress. Appl Environ Microbiol74:7750–7758. doi:10.1128/AEM.00982-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sanhueza E,
    2. Paredes-Osses E,
    3. González CL,
    4. García A
    . 2015. Effect of pH in the survival of Lactobacillus salivarius strain UCO_979C wild type and the pH acid acclimated variant. Electron J Biotechnol18:343–346. doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.06.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yao Z,
    2. Davis RM,
    3. Kishony R,
    4. Kahne D,
    5. Ruiz N
    . 2012. Regulation of cell size in response to nutrient availability by fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A109:E2561–E2568. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209742109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Weart RB,
    2. Lee AH,
    3. Chien AC,
    4. Haeusser DP,
    5. Hill NS,
    6. Levin PA
    . 2007. A metabolic sensor governing cell size in bacteria. Cell130:335–347. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Donachie WD,
    2. Begg KJ,
    3. Vicente M
    . 1976. Cell length, cell growth and cell division. Nature264:328–333. doi:10.1038/264328a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hill NS,
    2. Kadoya R,
    3. Chattoraj DK,
    4. Levin PA
    . 2012. Cell size and the initiation of DNA replication in bacteria. PLoS Genet52:15000–15005.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gardner SG,
    2. Johns KD,
    3. Tanner R,
    4. McCleary WR
    . 2014. The PhoU protein from Escherichia coli interacts with PhoR, PstB, and metals to form a phosphate-signaling complex at the membrane. J Bacteriol196:1741–1752. doi:10.1128/JB.00029-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Pirrung MC
    . 1999. Histidine kinases and two-component signal transduction systems. Chem Biol6:R167–R175. doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80044-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Santos-Beneit F
    . 2015. The Pho regulon: a huge regulatory network in bacteria. Front Microbiol6:1–13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Crépin S,
    2. Chekabab S-M,
    3. Le Bihan G,
    4. Bertrand N,
    5. Dozois CM,
    6. Harel J
    . 2011. The Pho regulon and the pathogenesis of Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol153:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.05.043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lamarche MG,
    2. Wanner BL,
    3. Crépin S,
    4. Harel J
    . 2008. The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: a regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev32:461–473. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00101.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Crépin S,
    2. Lamarche MG,
    3. Garneau P,
    4. Seguin J,
    5. Proulx J,
    6. Dozois CM,
    7. Harel J
    . 2008. Genome-wide transcriptional response of an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) pst mutant. BMC Genomics9:568. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Suziedeliené E,
    2. Suziedélis K,
    3. Garbenciūté V,
    4. Normark S
    . 1999. The acid-inducible asr gene in Escherichia coli: transcriptional control by the phoBR operon. J Bacteriol181:2084–2093.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Baek JH,
    2. Lee SY
    . 2006. Novel gene members in the Pho regulon of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett264:104–109. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00440.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Alcántara C,
    2. Revilla-Guarinos A,
    3. Zúñiga M
    . 2011. Influence of two-component signal transduction systems of Lactobacillus casei BL23 on tolerance to stress conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol77:1516–1519. doi:10.1128/AEM.02176-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Jordan S,
    2. Hutchings MI,
    3. Mascher T
    . 2008. Cell envelope stress response in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev32:107–146. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00091.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Revilla-Guarinos A,
    2. Gebhard S,
    3. Alcántara C,
    4. Staron A,
    5. Mascher T,
    6. Zuniga M
    . 2013. Characterization of a regulatory network of peptide antibiotic detoxification modules in Lactobacillus casei BL23. Appl Environ Microbiol79:3160–3170. doi:10.1128/AEM.00178-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Azcarate-Peril MA,
    2. McAuliffe O,
    3. Altermann E,
    4. Lick S,
    5. Russell WM,
    6. Klaenhammer TR
    . 2005. Microarray analysis of a two-component regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol71:5794–5804. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.5794-5804.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pfeiler EA,
    2. Azcarate-Peril MA,
    3. Klaenhammer TR
    . 2007. Characterization of a novel bile-inducible operon encoding a two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Bacteriol189:4624–4634. doi:10.1128/JB.00337-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Nakayama U,
    2. Akkermans ADL,
    3. de Vos WM
    . 2003. High-throughput PCR screening of genes for three-component regulatory system putatively involved in quorum sensing from low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem67:480–489. doi:10.1271/bbb.67.480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Johnsborg O,
    2. Diep DB,
    3. Nes IF
    . 2003. Structural analysis of the peptide pheromone receptor PlnB, a histidine protein kinase from Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol185:6913–6920. doi:10.1128/JB.185.23.6913-6920.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Lin S-J,
    2. Guarente L
    . 2003. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, a metabolic regulator of transcription, longevity and disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol15:241–246. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00006-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Tian X,
    2. Zhang N,
    3. Yang Y,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Chu J,
    6. Zhuang Y,
    7. Zhang S
    . 2015. The effect of redox environment on l-lactic acid production by Lactobacillus paracasei—a proof by genetically encoded in vivo NADH biosensor. Process Biochem50:2029–2034. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2015.10.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Berríos-Rivera SJ,
    2. Bennett GN,
    3. San K-Y
    . 2002. The effect of increasing NADH availability on the redistribution of metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli chemostat cultures. Metab Eng4:230–237. doi:10.1006/mben.2002.0228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Unden G,
    2. Bongaerts J
    . 1997. Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors. Biochim Biophys Acta1320:217–234. doi:10.1016/S0005-2728(97)00034-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Bromberger PD,
    3. Nieuwenhuiys G,
    4. Hatti-Kaul R
    . 2016. Redox balance in Lactobacillus reuteri DSM20016: roles of iron-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases in glucose/glycerol metabolism. PLoS One11:e0168107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168107.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. Guan N,
    2. Shin H,
    3. Chen RR,
    4. Li J,
    5. Liu L,
    6. Du G,
    7. Chen J
    . 2014. Understanding of how Propionibacterium acidipropionici respond to propionic acid stress at the level of proteomics. Sci Rep4:6951. doi:10.1038/srep06951.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.↵
    1. Guan N,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Shin H,
    4. Chen RR,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Li J,
    7. Du G,
    8. Shi Z,
    9. Chen J
    . 2013. Systems-level understanding of how Propionibacterium acidipropionici respond to propionic acid stress at the microenvironment levels: mechanism and application. J Biotechnol167:56–63. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.06.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Wilkinson A,
    2. Day J,
    3. Bowater R
    . 2001. Bacterial DNA ligases. Mol Microbiol40:1241–1248. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02479.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Sriskanda V,
    2. Shuman S
    . 2001. A second NAD+-dependent DNA ligase (LigB) in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res29:4930–4934. doi:10.1093/nar/29.24.4930.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Shrivastava N,
    2. Nag JK,
    3. Misra-Bhattacharya S
    . 2012. Molecular characterization of NAD+-dependent DNA ligase from Wolbachia endosymbiont of lymphatic filarial parasite Brugia malayi. PLoS One7:e41113. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Broadbent JR,
    2. Oberg TS,
    3. Hughes JE,
    4. Ward RE,
    5. Brighton C,
    6. Welker DL,
    7. Steele JL
    . 2014. Influence of polysorbate 80 and cyclopropane fatty acid synthase activity on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 at low pH. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol41:545–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Welker DL,
    2. Hughes JE,
    3. Steele JL,
    4. Broadbent JR
    . 2015. High efficiency electrotransformation of Lactobacillus casei. FEMS Microbiol Lett362:1–6. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnv033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Oehlert GW
    . 2000. A first course in design and analysis of experiments. WHFreeman, New York, NY.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Schneider CA,
    2. Rasband WS,
    3. Eliceiri KW
    . 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods9:671–675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Kokkinosa A,
    2. Fasseas C,
    3. Eliopoulos E,
    4. Kalantzopoulos G
    . 1998. Cell size of various lactic acid bacteria as determined by scanning electron microscope and image analysis. Lait78:491–500. doi:10.1051/lait:1998546.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Transient MutS-Based Hypermutation System for Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus casei to Low pH
Tom J. Overbeck, Dennis L. Welker, Joanne E. Hughes, James L. Steele, Jeff R. Broadbent
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2017, 83 (20) e01120-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01120-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transient MutS-Based Hypermutation System for Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus casei to Low pH
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Transient MutS-Based Hypermutation System for Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus casei to Low pH
Tom J. Overbeck, Dennis L. Welker, Joanne E. Hughes, James L. Steele, Jeff R. Broadbent
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2017, 83 (20) e01120-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01120-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
lactic acid
Lactobacillus casei
MutS DNA Mismatch-Binding Protein
adaptive evolution
acid tolerance
Lactobacillus casei
mismatch repair
lactic acid

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336