Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Public and Environmental Health Microbiology | Spotlight

Role of DNA Repair and Protective Components in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Inactivation by 400-nm-Wavelength Blue Light

Bahar Djouiai, Joanne E. Thwaite, Thomas R. Laws, Fabian M. Commichau, Barbara Setlow, Peter Setlow, Ralf Moeller
Donald W. Schaffner, Editor
Bahar Djouiai
aGerman Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Space Microbiology Research Group, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne E. Thwaite
bChemical, Biological and Radiological Division, Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas R. Laws
bChemical, Biological and Radiological Division, Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian M. Commichau
cDepartment of General Microbiology, Institute for Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fabian M. Commichau
Barbara Setlow
dDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Setlow
dDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf Moeller
aGerman Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Space Microbiology Research Group, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald W. Schaffner
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01604-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The high intrinsic decontamination resistance of Firmicutes spores is important medically (disease) and commercially (food spoilage). Effective methods of spore eradication would be of considerable interest in the health care and medical product industries, particularly if the decontamination method effectively killed spores while remaining benign to both humans and sensitive equipment. Intense blue light at a ∼400 nm wavelength is one such treatment that has drawn significant interest. This work has determined the resistance of spores to blue light in an extensive panel of Bacillus subtilis strains, including wild-type strains and mutants that (i) lack protective components such as the spore coat and its pigment(s) or the DNA protective α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins (SASP); (ii) have an elevated spore core water content; or (iii) lack enzymes involved in DNA repair, including those for homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (HR and NHEJ), apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases, nucleotide and base excision repair (NER and BER), translesion synthesis (TLS) by Y-family DNA polymerases, and spore photoproduct (SP) removal by SP lyase (SPL). The most important factors in spore blue light resistance were determined to be spore coats/pigmentation, α/β-type SASP, NER, BER, TLS, and SP repair. A major conclusion from this work is that blue light kills spores by DNA damage, and the results in this work indicate at least some of the specific DNA damage. It appears that high-intensity blue light could be a significant addition to the agents used to kill bacterial spores in applied settings.

IMPORTANCE Effective methods of spore inactivation would be of considerable interest in the health care and medical products industries, particularly if the decontamination method effectively killed spores while remaining benign to both humans and sensitive equipment. Intense blue light radiation is one such treatment that has drawn significant interest. In this work, all known spore-protective features, as well as universal and spore-specific DNA repair mechanisms, were tested in a systematic fashion for their contribution to the resistance of spores to blue light radiation.

INTRODUCTION

The development of new methods for bacterial inactivation has recently attracted increasing attention as a result of the increased prevalence of bacterial antibiotic resistance and the possible use of some bacteria as biological weapons, most notably spores of Bacillus anthracis (1–3). Spores of various species are also a major concern for the medical product, food, and health care industries, as spores cause much food spoilage and human disease and are very resistant to decontamination regimens that readily kill vegetative bacteria (4). Current methods for spore eradication include very high temperatures, UV radiation at 254 nm (UV-C), γ-radiation, and chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, and peracetic acid (5). However, while these treatments can be effective, they also can be dangerous to bystanders, damage foodstuffs, and cause severe damage to sensitive equipment. As a consequence, there are continuing efforts to develop new, effective sporicidal regimens that are less damaging than ones currently in use.

Bacterial spores are orders of magnitude more resistant to sporicidal agents than are vegetative cells (6). This extreme resistance is due to the remarkable spore structure and its many unique protective components (Fig. 1) (7). The specific factors that contribute to spores' resistance include (i) the outer coat layers and associated pigments that can protect against UV radiation and many chemicals (8), (ii) the peptidoglycan cortex, which is involved in reducing the spore core water content essential for spore resistance to wet heat and some DNA-damaging agents, (iii) a relatively impermeable inner spore membrane important in resistance to DNA-damaging chemicals, (iv) saturation of DNA in the spore core with α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins that alter DNA structure and result in protection against UV and γ-radiation, many genotoxic chemicals, and wet or dry heat, (v) the high level of Ca2+ with dipicolinic acid (CaDPA) in the spore core that lowers core water and alters spore UV radiation resistance (6, 7, 9); and (vi) a multitude of DNA repair enzymes in the spore core, including some that are spore specific, which repair spore DNA damage during germination and outgrowth (7, 9). Note that because of the minimal (if any) metabolic and enzymatic activity in the dormant spore core with its low water content, damage to essential spore macromolecules will accumulate until spores germinate, resume metabolism during outgrowth, and begin repairing macromolecular damage (10). Specific DNA damage repair in spore outgrowth includes dealing with a spore-specific UV photoproduct called the spore photoproduct (SP), which is repaired by an SP-specific repair enzyme called SP lyase (Spl) that monomerizes the SP dimer (11–13). SP and other DNA lesions can also be repaired during outgrowth by base excision repair (BER), which is the most commonly used DNA repair mechanism specific for base lesions. In BER, a glycosylase detects an altered base and hydrolyzes its N-glycosylic bond, producing a highly mutagenic apyrimidinic or abasic (AP) site (10). AP endonucleases, like ExoA and Nfo, then incise the DNA 5′ and 3′ to the AP sites, creating a gap in the DNA that is subsequently filled by DNA polymerase. Two other mechanisms are also relevant for spore DNA repair during outgrowth, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) (7). The NER process recognizes and reduces radiation- and chemical-induced DNA base damage, while MMR specifically repairs base-base mismatches and insertion/deletion mispairs caused by errors in DNA replication and recombination (14–16). Finally, DNA can also be repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), designed to ameliorate DNA double-strand breaks.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Schematic view of the multilayered B. subtilis spore coat structure (red dots displaying the SASP binding to the spore DNA).

Photodynamic inactivation of vegetative bacteria and spores by high-intensity visible light within the blue range of the spectrum at wavelengths of ∼400 nm has recently garnered significant interest due to the intrinsic antimicrobial characteristics of blue light (17–19). Significant activity has been demonstrated against Bacillus and Clostridium species; however, spores require a significantly larger dose of blue light to mediate killing than do vegetative cells (20). The sporicidal activity of blue light in vegetative bacteria was suggested to be due to the photoexcitation of endogenous porphyrins (photosensitizers) present in the bacterial cell wall, which results in the accumulation of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals (21–23). Indeed, blue light killing of Helicobacter pylori and Propionibacterium acnes is oxygen dependent (20). Notably, high-intensity blue light treatment is now an accepted method for spore inactivation and one that may find applied uses. However, very little is known of how blue light actually kills spores. Therefore, in the current work, we have examined possible factors involved in spore resistance to blue light, with the goal of learning how blue light actually mediates spore killing.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Blue light is known to have intrinsic antimicrobial effects without the addition of exogenous photosensitizers (21, 22). This property has promise for applications in areas such as medical product sterilization, surface decontamination, or food preservation. The effects of blue light have been tested relatively extensively for vegetative bacteria. However, less is known about the effects of blue light on dormant spores, including how blue light kills spores and what spore factors are important in blue light resistance. Consequently, spores of B. subtilis were used as a model system to examine the roles of various DNA repair pathways and spore protective components on spore resistance to blue light with a peak output at 400 nm. In total, spores of 25 isogenic mutants and their respective wild-type strains were exposed to blue light doses of up to 21,000 kJ/m2, and spore survival was assessed at various fluences (Fig. 2A through D and 3A and B; Tables 3 and 4).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Survival of B. subtilis spores in response to 400-nm-wavelength blue light. Spores were prepared and irradiated with blue light and spore killing was measured and calculated as described in Materials and Methods. Spores of various strains are as follows. (A) Protection; wild-type (strain PS832; filled circles), sspA sspB (filled upward triangles), cotE (open upward triangles), cotE gerE (filled squares), cotA (open squares), sspA sspB cotE (filled downward triangles), and dacB (open downward triangles). (B) Repair; wild-type (strain 168; open circles), exoA (filled upward triangles), nfo (open upward triangles), exoA nfo (filled squares), polY1 (open squares), polY2 (filled downward triangles), and polY1 polY2 (open downward triangles). (C) Repair; wild-type (strain 168; open circles), splB (filled upward triangles), uvrAB (open upward triangles), splB uvrAB (filled squares), ligD ku (open squares), recA (filled downward triangles), ligD ku recA (open downward triangles) and ligD ku splB (filled diamonds). (D) Repair; wild-type (strain 168; open circles), mutSL (filled upward triangles), disA (open upward triangles), sbcDC (filled squares), splB (open squares), mfd (filled downward triangles), and splB mfd (open downward triangles). Data are shown as means and standard deviations (n = 3). Error bars for survival data that are not visible are smaller than the symbol. Illustrative lines of best fit were added to each data set on the graphs to aid interpretation.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Mutant spores' sensitization to blue light relative to the respective wild-type spores. (A) Mutants lacking proteins involved in spore protection and (B) mutants in genes involved in different DNA repair mechanisms. Data obtained in Fig. 2A through D was used to calculate spores' fold sensitivity to blue light relative to that of wild-type spores, as described in Materials and Methods.

Role of protective structural components in spore inactivation by blue light.Spore structural components (Fig. 1), in particular pigmentation in the spore coat and components in the spore core such as α/β-type SASP, have previously been shown to provide a cumulative protective shield against inactivation by a variety of agents, including genotoxic chemicals, some oxidizing agents, and UV radiation (5, 24). Strikingly, spores of many, but not all, mutants with defects in spore-protective components exhibited decreased blue light resistance (Fig. 2A and 3A; Table 3). The proteins, loss of which decreased spore blue light resistance, in order from having the largest to the least effects, were (i) DNA protective α/β-type SASP (25, 26); (ii) the entire spore coat, most but not all of which is absent in a cotE gerE mutant (27) (although a cotE mutation which affects only the outer spore coat [28] had a minimal but not significant effect); (iii) CotA, responsible for most outer spore coat pigment production (29, 30); and DacB, as dacB spores have an ∼75% increased level of core water (25, 31). Overall, these results show that α/β-type SASP in the spore core and, to a lesser extent, spore pigmentation are important in protecting spores against killing by blue-light. The major effect of the absence of most α/β-type SASP on spore blue light resistance also indicates that DNA is the major target for blue light damage leading to spore killing.

Role of different DNA repair mechanisms in spore resistance to 400-nm-wavelength blue light.Since there is minimal, if any, metabolism within the dormant spore, any DNA damage accumulated by spores cannot be repaired in the dormant spores themselves. However, there are multiple DNA repair enzymes in dormant B. subtilis spores that can potentially repair spore DNA damage early in spore outgrowth when active metabolism returns (9, 32). Consequently, we examined the contribution that various DNA repair systems might make to spore blue light resistance. Indeed, a large number of mutant spores lacking one DNA repair gene exhibited significantly decreased blue light resistance (Fig. 2B through D and 3B; Table 4). Genes in which mutations resulted in 2- to 3-fold decreases in D10 (dose in kJ/m2 that is necessary to reduce survival to 10%) values included (i) uvrAB, important for NER, especially after UV damage (33, 34), (ii) splB, essential for repair of SP formed maximally by UV-C irradiation of spores and also by UV-A and UV-B irradiation (35), (iii) exoA and nfo, important in BER (34), (iv) mfd, responsible for repair of genes undergoing transcription (34), and (v) polY1 and polY2, which can carry out TLS over DNA lesions that would otherwise cause cell death (36, 37). Double mutations in any of the genes described above (i to v) either gave similar effects as the single mutations or gave larger effects. In contrast to the genes noted above, mutations in which had large effects on spore blue light resistance, mutations in a number of other DNA repair genes had much smaller to minimal effects on spore blue light resistance. These included sbcDC, involved in repair of DNA crosslinks (34), mutSL, important in DNA mismatch repair (34), and disA, involved in a DNA damage-dependent checkpoint formation in outgrowing spores (37). This last checkpoint allows time for repair of at least some types of DNA damage before outgrowing spores initiate DNA replication (37). In addition, a deletion in the recA gene, important in DNA repair by HR (38), or in both the ku and ligD genes, important in DNA repair by NHEJ, had no effects on spore resistance to blue light (39). Overall, the effects of these mutations in DNA repair genes on spore blue light resistance further suggest that spore DNA is the lethal target in spores for blue light. The results also give some indications of which repair pathways deal with blue light lesions and thus indicate lesions in spore DNA caused by blue light.

Conclusions.The work in this communication strongly indicates that DNA is the spore component that is the major target for lethal damage caused by blue light. This is consistent with the increased blue light sensitivity of spores lacking most DNA protective α/β-type SASP or the DNA repair proteins Spl, ExoA, Nfo, and Mfd. In addition, that polY1 and/or polY2 mutations caused the biggest decreases in spore blue light resistance is consistent with lethal blue light damage being to DNA, as the products of these two genes are important in replication over DNA lesions that would block replication by replicative DNA polymerases. It is, of course, next to impossible to rule out the possibility that blue light also causes some damage to other spore components—for example, to spore proteins or lipids—perhaps by oxidative damage caused by ROS generated by blue light.

Given that DNA is the major blue light target, an important question is whether this damage is a direct effect of blue light or an indirect effect, perhaps caused by generation of ROS. Indeed, blue light killing of growing bacteria has been suggested to be due to ROS generation, as ROS scavengers or anoxic conditions are reported to greatly reduce blue light killing of growing cells or spores (40). Importantly, killing of wild-type and α−/β− spores by blue light was minimal under anoxic conditions (Fig. 4). This indicates that with at least these spores, ROS generated in spores by blue light are what kills spores, presumably some of the damage is to DNA, and α/β-type SASP are known to protect spore DNA extremely well against ROS (9) (Fig. 4). That DNA is a major target of ROS generated by blue light is also consistent with the increased blue light sensitivity of spores lacking Spl, UvrAB, ExoA, Nfo, Mfd, PolY1, and/or PolY2. It is also possible that with wild-type spores, in which DNA is well protected against blue light, ROS could generate lethal damage to one or more essential spore core proteins. Indeed, this is thought to be how hydrogen peroxide kills dormant spores (37). However, since uvrAB and, in particular, spl spores exhibit decreased blue light resistance, and Spl only repairs SP, it seems most likely that SP is generated directly by blue light. Indeed, SP is generated by irradiation with UV-A alone (41–43). It is also possible that the increased killing of uvrAB spores is due to decreased SP repair, as this is carried out by both Spl and NER using UvrAB (44, 45). It has to be kept in mind that ROS detoxification by catalase or superoxide dismutase appears to play a very minor role, if any, in spore resistance to ionizing radiation or oxidizing agents (46, 47). These enzymes play no role in dormant spore resistance to oxidizing agents, most likely because enzymes in the spore core are inactive due to the core's low water content.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Survival of B. subtilis spores in response to 400-nm-wavelength blue light under anoxic conditions (H2/N2). Spores were prepared to a concentration of 1 × 107/ml and irradiated with blue light within an anaerobic chamber, and spore killing was measured and calculated as described in Materials and Methods. Spores of various strains are as follows: wild-type (strain PS832) oxic (filled circles), wild-type (strain PS832) anoxic (open circles), sspA sspB (strain PS356) oxic (filled squares), and sspA sspB (strain PS356) anoxic (open squares). Data are shown as means and standard deviations (n = 3). Error bars for survival data that are not visible are smaller than the symbol. Illustrative lines of best fit were added to each data set on the graphs to aid interpretation.

A second question is why cotE, cotA, and cotE gerE spores that have spore coat defects are more blue light sensitive than wild-type spores. There appear to be two possible explanations for this finding, as follows. (i) These coat-defective spores lack pigment in the coats that can absorb 400-nm-wavelength radiation. Thus, the effects of the cot mutations may simply be to reduce the spore coat absorption of blue light such that ROS generation in the spore core, where spore DNA is located, is reduced. (ii) Alternatively, blue light may also generate ROS in spore coat layers, but these reactive species would normally be neutralized by reacting with the large amount of spore coat protein. However, ROS generated in the outer layers of cot spores would have much less adjacent coat protein to react with and might then damage more inner spore layers, such as the inner membrane. Indeed, inner membrane damage has been shown to be the mechanism whereby oxidizing agents, such as ozone and hypochlorite, kill spores, and this damage is much more severe in cotE spores (48). We favor the first explanation, since cotA spores lack only CotA and not many other coat proteins, whereas cotE and cotE gerE spores lack many spore coat proteins in addition to CotA (30, 49, 50).

Finally, whether all spore damage by blue light, in particular to DNA, is a direct effect of this irradiation or an indirect effect is not yet completely clear. However, we can draw some conclusions as to the identities of the DNA damage caused by blue light. First, it appears clear that DNA double-strand breaks are not responsible for spore killing by blue light, as loss of proteins involved in HR or NHEJ had at most minimal effects on blue light killing of spores. In contrast, agents such as γ-radiation and vacuum UV radiation do generate double-strand breaks in DNA, and HR and NHEJ proteins are important in spore resistance to these agents (51). The one DNA lesion that is clearly generated in spore DNA by blue light is SP, as an spl mutation causes a large decrease in spore blue light resistance, and Spl only repairs SP, which can also be repaired by the NER pathway (45). While ExoA and Nfo do not participate in SP repair by Spl, they are important in repair of other types of DNA damage, including abasic sites and oxidized bases, both of which can be generated directly or indirectly by ROS (52–54). Notably, UV-A has been shown to generate SP, but it does not cause significant cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimer formation between adjacent pyrimidines in DNA (44, 45). However, there are additional DNA photoproducts that could be generated by blue light, including 6 to 4 photoproducts between adjacent pyrimidines (55, 56). Thus, direct analysis of all DNA photoproducts generated by blue light irradiation of spores seems warranted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Spore production and purification.Endospores from two sets of B. subtilis strains were used in this study and are listed in Tables 1 and 2. All mutants are isogenic with their respective wild-type strains, which in this study were either 168 or PS832, the latter being a laboratory derivative of the former strain. The first set of strains were comprised of a panel of mutants that generated spores deficient in various DNA repair activities (Table 1); the second set comprised mutants generating spores altered in various protective factors or structures, such as the spore coat, spore coat pigment, core hydration, or α/β-type SASP (Table 2; Fig. 1). Spores were prepared by cultivation of growing cells in double-strength liquid Schaeffer sporulation medium (SSM) (57) with vigorous aeration at 37°C for 72 h. Spores were harvested and purified by repeated washing steps using sterile water, followed by lysozyme and DNase I treatment for removal of remaining vegetative cells (5). An additional heat inactivation step at 80°C for 10 min was conducted to ensure inactivation of remaining vegetative cells or germinated spores. Final spore preparations were free (>99%) from vegetative cells, germinated spores, and cell debris, as determined by phase-contrast microscopy. Spores were stored at 4°C until used for experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

DNA-repair deficient B. subtilis strains used in this study

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

B. subtilis strains giving spores with alterations in protective components

Assay of spore resistance to blue light radiation.High-intensity blue light at a wavelength of 400 nm was generated using a light-emitting diode (LED) flood array (Henkel-Loctite, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The LED array emission peaked at 400 nm at a bandwidth of ±8.5 nm at a full-width half maximum (Fig. 5), as determined using a USB2000 spectrophotometer (Ocean Optics, Oxford, United Kingdom). The device is provided with 144 reflectorized LEDs, which produce a homogeneous illuminated area of 10 × 10 cm. The array produces a uniform light irradiance of 600 J/m2/s−1 at 15.5 cm from the test area and was calibrated at the Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Salisbury, United Kingdom, using a PM100D radiant power meter (Thorlabs, Newton, NJ). The fluence rate was calculated accordingly. The spores were diluted in 2 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.7% Na2HPO4 ×2 H2O, 0.3% KH2PO4, 0.4% NaCl; pH 7.5) with a spore concentration of 1 × 106 and placed in wells of 12-well microtiter plates before exposure to blue light. Duplicate plates were used; one was exposed to high-intensity blue light and sealed with an Absolute quantitative PCR (qPCR) plate sealer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, Scotland) to prevent evaporation, while nontreated control samples were placed next to the exposure plate in the blue light cabinet and wrapped in aluminum foil to account for the heating effect during the treatment.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Spectral output of the LED array (Henkel-Locite) used for spore exposure.

Temperature measurement.The temperature of treated spore suspensions was measured in 12-well plates, in which only 9 wells were used to ensure a consistent exposure to all wells. A submersible aquarium thermometer (ETI, United Kingdom) was used for temperature measurements and was recorded and plotted constantly throughout the treatment at 5 min intervals. In a subsequent test, this temperature measurement was repeated over a period of 3 months on 3 separate occasions, with an extremely high data consistency on each occasion.

Recovery and evaluation of spore survival.Spore survival was determined using appropriate serial dilutions in sterile distilled water. Aliquots of spore dilutions were plated on nutrient broth agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C to determine the CFU from macroscopically visible colonies.

Numerical and statistical analysis.In all experiments, the B. subtilis spore survival fraction was determined from the quotient N/N0, with N as the mean CFU of blue light-treated samples and N0 as the mean CFU of untreated controls. Spore inactivation curves were obtained by plotting the logarithm of N/N0 as a function of dose in kJ/m2 for blue light fluency. The inactivation constant (IC) in J/m2 was determined from the slope of the dose-effect curves for each sample. In order to determine the slope of the curve, only the linear part of the curve was taken for calculation; the shoulder or nonlinear part of the curve (DQ value) was neglected. The data in Tables 3 and 4 provide radiation-relevant parameters of the spore inactivation curves. D10 demonstrates the dose in kJ/m2 that is necessary to reduce survival to 10%, whereas D0 shows the required dose to reduce relative survival to 37% and best characterizes the sensitivity of the cellular system. The DQ value, which is also called the quasithreshold (i.e., the intercept of the regression line), is the last dose with 100% spore survival rate. The inactivation constant (IC) was determined from the slope of the dose-effect curves and gives an insight into the “speed” of spore inactivation. All values of N and N0 were averages of triplicate measurements in each of three independent blue light exposures. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). Significances of differences in the inactivation rates were investigated by analysis of variance (multigroup one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]), using SigmaPlot Software Version 13.0 (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany). Differences with P values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant (25, 26).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Survival parameters of blue light-exposed B. subtilis spores with alterations in protective componentsa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Survival parameters of blue light-exposed spores of DNA repair-deficient mutant sporesa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to Andrea Schroeder, Katja Nagler, and Marina Raguse for their skillful technical assistance during parts of this work. We thank Jörg Stülke from George-August-University Göttingen, who provided the GP strains for this study.

B.D. and R.M. were supported by DLR grant DLR-FuE-Projekt ISS LIFE, Programm RF-FuW, program 475. B.S. and P.S. were supported by a research grant (W91NF-16-1-0024) to P.S. from the Army Research Office. F.M.C. was supported by the grant Co 1139/1-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

The results of this study will be included in the master's thesis of the first author (B.D.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 June 2018.
    • Accepted 24 July 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 27 July 2018.
  • Address correspondence to Ralf Moeller, ralf.moeller{at}dlr.de.
  • Citation Djouiai B, Thwaite JE, Laws TR, Commichau FM, Setlow B, Setlow P, Moeller R. 2018. Role of DNA repair and protective components in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to inactivation by 400-nm-wavelength blue light. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01604-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01604-18.

  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01604-18.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Spotts Whitney EA,
    2. Beatty ME,
    3. Taylor TH, Jr,
    4. Weyant R,
    5. Sobel J,
    6. Arduino MJ,
    7. Ashford DA
    . 2003. Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores. Emerg Infect Dis 9:623–627. doi:10.3201/eid0906.020377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Goel R,
    3. Chawla R,
    4. Silambarasan M,
    5. Sharma RK
    . 2010. Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear decontamination: Recent trends and future perspective. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2:220–238. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.68505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Coohill TP,
    2. Sagripanti JL
    . 2008. Overview of the inactivation by 254 nm ultraviolet radiation of bacteria with particular relevance to biodefense. Photochem Photobiol 84:1084–1090. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00387.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Williams GJ,
    2. Denyer SP,
    3. Hosein IK,
    4. Hill DW,
    5. Maillard JY
    . 2009. Limitations of the efficacy of surface disinfection in the healthcare setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:570–573. doi:10.1086/597382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Setlow P
    . 2006. Spores of Bacillus subtilis: their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J Appl Microbiol 101:514–525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02736.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nicholson WL,
    2. Munakata N,
    3. Horneck G,
    4. Melosh HJ,
    5. Setlow P
    . 2000. Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:548–572. doi:10.1128/MMBR.64.3.548-572.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Leggett MJ,
    2. McDonnell G,
    3. Denyer SP,
    4. Setlow P,
    5. Maillard JY
    . 2012. Bacterial spore structures and their protective role in biocide resistance. J Appl Microbiol 113:485–498. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05336.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Horneck G,
    3. Facius R,
    4. Stackebrandt E
    . 2005. Role of pigmentation in protecting Bacillus sp. endospores against environmental UV radiation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:231–236. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.08.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Setlow P
    . 2014. Spore resistance properties. Microbiol Spectr 2. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0003-2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lenhart JS,
    2. Schroeder JW,
    3. Walsh BW,
    4. Simmons LA
    . 2012. DNA repair and genome maintenance in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:530–564. doi:10.1128/MMBR.05020-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Munakata N,
    2. Rupert CS
    . 1972. Genetically controlled removal of “spore photoproduct” from deoxyribonucleic acid of ultraviolet-irradiated Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 111:192–198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Munakata N,
    2. Rupert CS
    . 1974. Dark repair of DNA containing “spore photoproduct” in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet 130:239–250. doi:10.1007/BF00268802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Setlow P
    . 1992. I will survive: protecting and repairing spore DNA. J Bacteriol 174:2737–2741. doi:10.1128/jb.174.9.2737-2741.1992.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lenhart JS,
    2. Pillon MC,
    3. Guarne A,
    4. Biteen JS,
    5. Simmons LA
    . 2016. Mismatch repair in Gram-positive bacteria. Res Microbiol 167:4–12. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2015.08.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fishel R
    . 2015. Mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 290:26395–26403. doi:10.1074/jbc.R115.660142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ramirez-Guadiana FH,
    2. Barraza-Salas M,
    3. Ramirez-Ramirez N,
    4. Ortiz-Cortes M,
    5. Setlow P,
    6. Pedraza-Reyes M
    . 2012. Alternative excision repair of ultraviolet B- and C-induced DNA damage in dormant and developing spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 194:6096–6104. doi:10.1128/JB.01340-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gillespie JB,
    2. Maclean M,
    3. Given MJ,
    4. Wilson MP,
    5. Judd MD,
    6. Timoshkin IV,
    7. MacGregor SJ
    . 2017. Efficacy of pulsed 405-nm light-emitting diodes for antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation: effects of intensity, frequency, and duty cycle. Photomed Laser Surg 35:150–156. doi:10.1089/pho.2016.4179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Maclean M,
    2. Murdoch LE,
    3. MacGregor SJ,
    4. Anderson JG
    . 2013. Sporicidal effects of high-intensity 405 nm visible light on endospore-forming bacteria. Photochem Photobiol 89:120–126. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01202.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tomb RM,
    2. White TA,
    3. Coia JE,
    4. Anderson JG,
    5. MacGregor SJ,
    6. Maclean M
    . 2018. Review of the comparative susceptibility of microbial species to photoinactivation using 380–480 nm violet-blue light. Photochem Photobiol 94:445–458. doi:10.1111/php.12883.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maclean M,
    2. MacGregor SJ,
    3. Anderson JG,
    4. Woolsey G
    . 2009. Inactivation of bacterial pathogens following exposure to light from a 405-nanometer light-emitting diode array. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1932–1937. doi:10.1128/AEM.01892-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Hamblin MR,
    2. Hasan T
    . 2004. Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem Photobiol Sci 3:436–450. doi:10.1039/b311900a.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Maclean M,
    2. Macgregor SJ,
    3. Anderson JG,
    4. Woolsey GA
    . 2008. The role of oxygen in the visible-light inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus. J Photochem Photobiol B 92:180–184. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.06.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Feuerstein O,
    2. Ginsburg I,
    3. Dayan E,
    4. Veler D,
    5. Weiss EI
    . 2005. Mechanism of visible light phototoxicity on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Photochem Photobiol 81:1186–1189. doi:10.1562/2005-04-06-RA-477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Setlow P
    . 2007. I will survive: DNA protection in bacterial spores. Trends Microbiol 15:172–180. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Setlow P,
    3. Reitz G,
    4. Nicholson WL
    . 2009. Roles of small, acid-soluble spore proteins and core water content in survival of Bacillus subtilis spores exposed to environmental solar UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5202–5208. doi:10.1128/AEM.00789-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hackett RH,
    2. Setlow P
    . 1988. Properties of spores of Bacillus subtilis strains which lack the major small, acid-soluble protein. J Bacteriol 170:1403–1404. doi:10.1128/jb.170.3.1403-1404.1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zheng L,
    2. Halberg R,
    3. Roels S,
    4. Ichikawa H,
    5. Kroos L,
    6. Losick R
    . 1992. Sporulation regulatory protein GerE from Bacillus subtilis binds to and can activate or repress transcription from promoters for mother-cell-specific genes. J Mol Biol 226:1037–1050. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)91051-P.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zheng LB,
    2. Donovan WP,
    3. Fitz-James PC,
    4. Losick R
    . 1988. Gene encoding a morphogenic protein required in the assembly of the outer coat of the Bacillus subtilis endospore. Genes Dev 2:1047–1054. doi:10.1101/gad.2.8.1047.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sandman K,
    2. Kroos L,
    3. Cutting S,
    4. Youngman P,
    5. Losick R
    . 1988. Identification of the promoter for a spore coat protein gene in Bacillus subtilis and studies on the regulation of its induction at a late stage of sporulation. J Mol Biol 200:461–473. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(88)90536-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hullo MF,
    2. Moszer I,
    3. Danchin A,
    4. Martin-Verstraete I
    . 2001. CotA of Bacillus subtilis is a copper-dependent laccase. J Bacteriol 183:5426–5430. doi:10.1128/JB.183.18.5426-5430.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Popham DL,
    2. Sengupta S,
    3. Setlow P
    . 1995. Heat, hydrogen peroxide, and UV resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores with increased core water content and with or without major DNA-binding proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3633–3638.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Setlow P,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Li YQ
    . 2017. Germination of spores of the orders Bacillales and Clostridiales. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:459–477. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093558.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kisker C,
    2. Kuper J,
    3. Van Houten B
    . 2013. Prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a012591. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012591.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gunka K,
    2. Tholen S,
    3. Gerwig J,
    4. Herzberg C,
    5. Stulke J,
    6. Commichau FM
    . 2012. A high-frequency mutation in Bacillus subtilis: requirements for the decryptification of the gudB glutamate dehydrogenase gene. J Bacteriol 194:1036–1044. doi:10.1128/JB.06470-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Pedraza-Reyes M,
    2. Gutierrez-Corona F,
    3. Nicholson WL
    . 1994. Temporal regulation and forespore-specific expression of the spore photoproduct lyase gene by sigma-G RNA polymerase during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol 176:3983–3991. doi:10.1128/jb.176.13.3983-3991.1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Duigou S,
    2. Ehrlich SD,
    3. Noirot P,
    4. Noirot-Gros MF
    . 2005. DNA polymerase I acts in translesion synthesis mediated by the Y-polymerases in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 57:678–690. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04725.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Rivas-Castillo AM,
    2. Yasbin RE,
    3. Robleto E,
    4. Nicholson WL,
    5. Pedraza-Reyes M
    . 2010. Role of the Y-family DNA polymerases YqjH and YqjW in protecting sporulating Bacillus subtilis cells from DNA damage. Curr Microbiol 60:263–267. doi:10.1007/s00284-009-9535-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Cheo DL,
    2. Bayles KW,
    3. Yasbin RE
    . 1992. Molecular characterization of regulatory elements controlling expression of the Bacillus subtilis recA+ gene. Biochimie 74:755–762. doi:10.1016/0300-9084(92)90148-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Weller GR,
    2. Kysela B,
    3. Roy R,
    4. Tonkin LM,
    5. Scanlan E,
    6. Della M,
    7. Devine SK,
    8. Day JP,
    9. Wilkinson A,
    10. d'Adda di Fagagna F,
    11. Devine KM,
    12. Bowater RP,
    13. Jeggo PA,
    14. Jackson SP,
    15. Doherty AJ
    . 2002. Identification of a DNA nonhomologous end-joining complex in bacteria. Science 297:1686–1689. doi:10.1126/science.1074584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. St Denis TG,
    2. Dai T,
    3. Hamblin MR
    . 2013. Killing bacterial spores with blue light: when innate resistance meets the power of light. Photochem Photobiol 89:2–4. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01233.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Li L
    . 2015. Spore photoproduct lyase: the known, the controversial, and the unknown. J Biol Chem 290:4003–4009. doi:10.1074/jbc.R114.573675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Nicholson WL,
    2. Schuerger AC,
    3. Douki T
    . 2018. The photochemistry of unprotected DNA and DNA inside Bacillus subtilis spores exposed to simulated Martian surface conditions of atmospheric composition, temperature, pressure, and solar radiation. Astrobiology 18:393–402. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1721.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Ravanat JL,
    2. Douki T,
    3. Cadet J
    . 2001. Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components. J Photochem Photobiol B 63:88–102. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00206-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Slieman TA,
    2. Nicholson WL
    . 2000. Artificial and solar UV radiation induces strand breaks and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in Bacillus subtilis spore DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:199–205. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.1.199-205.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Xue Y,
    2. Nicholson WL
    . 1996. The two major spore DNA repair pathways, nucleotide excision repair and spore photoproduct lyase, are sufficient for the resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores to artificial UV-C and UV-B but not to solar radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2221–2227.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Raguse M,
    3. Reitz G,
    4. Okayasu R,
    5. Li Z,
    6. Klein S,
    7. Setlow P,
    8. Nicholson WL
    . 2014. Resistance of Bacillus subtilis spore DNA to lethal ionizing radiation damage relies primarily on spore core components and DNA repair, with minor effects of oxygen radical detoxification. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:104–109. doi:10.1128/AEM.03136-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Casillas-Martinez L,
    2. Setlow P
    . 1997. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, catalase, MrgA, and superoxide dismutase are not involved in resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores to heat or oxidizing agents. J Bacteriol 179:7420–7425. doi:10.1128/jb.179.23.7420-7425.1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Riesenman PJ,
    2. Nicholson WL
    . 2000. Role of the spore coat layers in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to hydrogen peroxide, artificial UV-C, UV-B, and solar UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:620–626. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.2.620-626.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Plomp M,
    2. Carroll AM,
    3. Setlow P,
    4. Malkin AJ
    . 2014. Architecture and assembly of the Bacillus subtilis spore coat. PLoS One 9:e108560. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108560.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Driks A,
    2. Eichenberger P
    . 2016. The spore coat. Microbiol Spectr 4. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0023-2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Stackebrandt E,
    3. Reitz G,
    4. Berger T,
    5. Rettberg P,
    6. Doherty AJ,
    7. Horneck G,
    8. Nicholson WL
    . 2007. Role of DNA repair by nonhomologous-end joining in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to extreme dryness, mono- and polychromatic UV, and ionizing radiation. J Bacteriol 189:3306–3311. doi:10.1128/JB.00018-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Setlow P,
    3. Pedraza-Reyes M,
    4. Okayasu R,
    5. Reitz G,
    6. Nicholson WL
    . 2011. Role of the Nfo and ExoA apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases in radiation resistance and radiation-induced mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 193:2875–2879. doi:10.1128/JB.00134-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Campos SS,
    2. Ibarra-Rodriguez JR,
    3. Barajas-Ornelas RC,
    4. Ramirez-Guadiana FH,
    5. Obregon-Herrera A,
    6. Setlow P,
    7. Pedraza-Reyes M
    . 2014. Interaction of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases Nfo and ExoA with the DNA integrity scanning protein DisA in the processing of oxidative DNA damage during Bacillus subtilis spore outgrowth. J Bacteriol 196:568–578. doi:10.1128/JB.01259-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Ibarra JR,
    2. Orozco AD,
    3. Rojas JA,
    4. Lopez K,
    5. Setlow P,
    6. Yasbin RE,
    7. Pedraza-Reyes M
    . 2008. Role of the Nfo and ExoA apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases in repair of DNA damage during outgrowth of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 190:2031–2038. doi:10.1128/JB.01625-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Douki T,
    2. von Koschembahr A,
    3. Cadet J
    . 2017. Insight in DNA repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers by chromatographic methods. Photochem Photobiol 93:207–215. doi:10.1111/php.12685.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Cadet J,
    2. Grand A,
    3. Douki T
    . 2015. Solar UV radiation-induced DNA bipyrimidine photoproducts: formation and mechanistic insights. Top Curr Chem 356:249–275. doi:10.1007/128_2014_553.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Schaeffer P,
    2. Millet J,
    3. Aubert JP
    . 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 54:704–711.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  58. 58.
    1. Moeller R,
    2. Schuerger AC,
    3. Reitz G,
    4. Nicholson WL
    . 2011. Impact of two DNA repair pathways, homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, on bacterial spore inactivation under simulated Martian environmental conditions. Icarus 215:204–210. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.035.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. 59.
    1. Mehne FM,
    2. Gunka K,
    3. Eilers H,
    4. Herzberg C,
    5. Kaever V,
    6. Stulke J
    . 2013. Cyclic di-AMP homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis: both lack and high level accumulation of the nucleotide are detrimental for cell growth. J Biol Chem 288:2004–2017. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.395491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.
    1. Gaballa A,
    2. Newton GL,
    3. Antelmann H,
    4. Parsonage D,
    5. Upton H,
    6. Rawat M,
    7. Claiborne A,
    8. Fahey RC,
    9. Helmann JD
    . 2010. Biosynthesis and functions of bacillithiol, a major low-molecular-weight thiol in Bacilli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6482–6486. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000928107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.
    1. Kunst F,
    2. Rapoport G
    . 1995. Salt stress is an environmental signal affecting degradative enzyme synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 177:2403–2407. doi:10.1128/jb.177.9.2403-2407.1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.
    1. Paidhungat M,
    2. Ragkousi K,
    3. Setlow P
    . 2001. Genetic requirements for induction of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis by Ca2+-dipicolinate. J Bacteriol 183:4886–4893. doi:10.1128/JB.183.16.4886-4893.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.
    1. Ghosh S,
    2. Setlow B,
    3. Wahome PG,
    4. Cowan AE,
    5. Plomp M,
    6. Malkin AJ,
    7. Setlow P
    . 2008. Characterization of spores of Bacillus subtilis that lack most coat layers. J Bacteriol 190:6741–6748. doi:10.1128/JB.00896-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.
    1. Setlow B,
    2. Setlow P
    . 1996. Role of DNA repair in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance. J Bacteriol 178:3486–3495. doi:10.1128/jb.178.12.3486-3495.1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.
    1. Young SB,
    2. Setlow P
    . 2003. Mechanisms of killing of Bacillus subtilis spores by hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide. J Appl Microbiol 95:54–67. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01960.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 66.
    1. Zhu B,
    2. Stulke J
    . 2018. SubtiWiki in 2018: from genes and proteins to functional network annotation of the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D743–D748. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx908.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Role of DNA Repair and Protective Components in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Inactivation by 400-nm-Wavelength Blue Light
Bahar Djouiai, Joanne E. Thwaite, Thomas R. Laws, Fabian M. Commichau, Barbara Setlow, Peter Setlow, Ralf Moeller
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2018, 84 (19) e01604-18; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01604-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of DNA Repair and Protective Components in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Inactivation by 400-nm-Wavelength Blue Light
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Role of DNA Repair and Protective Components in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Inactivation by 400-nm-Wavelength Blue Light
Bahar Djouiai, Joanne E. Thwaite, Thomas R. Laws, Fabian M. Commichau, Barbara Setlow, Peter Setlow, Ralf Moeller
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 2018, 84 (19) e01604-18; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01604-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus subtilis
spore resistance
blue light
DNA repair
decontamination
antimicrobial
endospores
protection

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336