Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Invertebrate Microbiology

Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca, Two ETX/MTX2-Type Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins Active against Hemipteran Pests

Yonglei Liu, Yinglong Wang, Changlong Shu, Kejian Lin, Fuping Song, Alejandra Bravo, Mario Soberón, Jie Zhang
Janet L. Schottel, Editor
Yonglei Liu
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yinglong Wang
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
bSchool of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changlong Shu
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kejian Lin
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fuping Song
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandra Bravo
cInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mario Soberón
cInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Zhang
aState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet L. Schottel
University of Minnesota
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01996-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Genetically modified crops that express insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins have become a primary approach for control of lepidopteran (moth) and coleopteran (beetle) pests that feed by chewing the plants. However, the sap-sucking insects (Hemiptera) are not particularly susceptible to Bt toxins. In this study, we describe two Cry toxins (Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca) from Bt strain 1012 that showed toxicity against two important hemipteran rice pests, Laodelphax striatellus and Sogatella furcifera. Both of these proteins contain an ETX/MTX2 domain and share common sequence features with the β-pore-forming toxins. Coexpression of cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes in the acrystalliferous Bt strain HD73− resulted in high insecticidal activity against both hemipteran pests. No toxicity was observed on other pests such as Ostrinia furnacalis, Plutella xylostella, or Colaphellus bowringi. Also, no hemolytic activity or toxicity against cancer cells was detected. Binding assays showed specific binding of the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca toxin complex to brush border membrane vesicles isolated from L. striatellus. Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca are Bt Cry toxins highly effective against hemipteran pests and could provide a novel strategy for the environmentally friendly biological control of rice planthoppers in transgenic plants.

IMPORTANCE In Asia, rice is an important staple food, whose production is threatened by rice planthoppers. To date, no effective Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) protein has been shown to have activity against rice planthoppers. We cloned two Bt toxin genes from Bt strain 1012 that showed toxicity against small brown planthoppers (Laodelphax striatellus) and white-backed planthoppers (Sogatella furcifera). To our knowledge, the proteins encoded by the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes are the most efficient insecticidal Bt Cry proteins with activity against hemipteran insects reported so far. Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca showed no toxicity against some lepidopteran or coleopteran pests. These two proteins should be able to be used for integrated hemipteran pest management.

INTRODUCTION

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a common insect pathogen that is widely distributed in various ecological niches, including, but not limited to, water, soil, insects, and plant surfaces (1). The main virulence factors of Bt are insecticidal crystal proteins (ICPs) including Cry and Cyt toxins that are produced during the sporulation stage (2). When insects ingest the ICPs, the crystals are solubilized in the alkaline midgut lumen and are activated by gut proteases to yield mature toxins. The activated toxins bind with receptors located on the plasma membrane of the midgut epithelium of the target insects, resulting in pore formation, disturbance of the osmotic balance, and cell lysis, finally causing insect death (3). Due to the high specificity of Cry toxins, these proteins have been shown to be safe for humans or other vertebrates. Thus, some Bt strains have been used as biological pesticides and some cry genes have been employed for the construction of transgenic crops that resist insect attack (4).

Cry toxins with considerable insecticidal activity against lepidopteran, dipteran, and coleopteran pests have been described. However, hemipteran insects are not particularly susceptible to Bt toxins (5). To date, only a few examples of poorly active Bt strains or Bt toxins have been reported (6–8). Among these, we can mention the Cry51Aa2 toxin (Cry-ETX/MTX type) that showed a median lethal concentration (LC50) of 72.9 μg/ml against Lygus hesperus (6) and the Cry41Aa-related protein with an LC50 of 32.7 μg/ml against Myzus persicae (7). On the other hand, engineered Bt toxins with improved toxicity to sap-sucking pests have been described. The addition or replacement of a pea aphid gut-binding peptide in specific loop regions of Cyt2Aa effectively promoted the toxicity of this hybrid toxin against Acyrthosiphon pisum with an LC50 of 9.55 to 28.74 μg/ml, which was significantly lower than the LC50 of the wild type Cyt2Aa (>150 μg/ml) (5). A similar strategy was applied for the molecular modification of Cry1Ab, retargeting its toxicity against Nilaparvata lugens (brown planthopper) (9). Another example is the Cry51Aa2 variant obtained by combinatorial and saturation mutagenesis that resulted in high toxicity against Lygus spp. (LC50 of 0.3 to 0.85 μg/ml). This toxin had been expressed in cotton plants, causing an effective decrease of the Lygus spp. populations in field trials (10). All of these cases fully demonstrated the potential of Bt proteins for the control of hemipteran pests.

Here, we report novel features of two Bt Cry toxins, Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca, which were previously identified from Bt isolates showing toxicity against HepG2 cancer cells (11). We cloned both genes and confirmed that Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins expressed together in an acrystalliferous Bt strain showed high insecticidal activity against rice planthoppers but no cytotoxicity against HepG2 cells. To our knowledge, these toxins are the most toxic Bt Cry proteins against hemipteran pests described so far.

RESULTS

Isolation of Bt strain 1012 and draft genome sequence.Screening of Bt strains for toxicity against hemipteran insects identified Bt strain 1012 (given the internal lab code IPPBIOTSUC1012), whose crude spore/crystal protein extract (Fig. 1A) had high insecticidal activity against Laodelphax striatellus (small brown planthopper). Scanning electron microscope observation of crystals produced by Bt 1012 revealed amorphous crystals (Fig. 1B). In order to identify the virulence factors produced by Bt 1012, genomic DNA was isolated and sequenced by a high-throughput sequencing technology. After the processing of raw sequence data, a total of 5,688,491 nucleotide base pairs (G+C content, 34.95%) constituted 39 scaffolds which were sized 5.51 MB, and 6,063 protein-coding sequences were predicted. Draft genome annotation using a local Bt toxin database revealed two putative cry toxin genes. The sequences of the two cry genes were identical with the previously reported cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes, respectively (GenBank accession no. KC960014) (11). In addition, we conclude that the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes are plasmid encoded since these genes were located at scaff_269 in the genome draft sequence and a BLASTN search revealed that scaff_269 shows 99% identity with plasmid pYGD98 from the Bacillus thuringiensis strain YGd22-03.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (A) and scanning electron micrograph (SEM) (B) analyses of spores and crystal mixtures from Bt strain 1012 are shown.

Molecular characterization of Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca.The lengths of the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes were 870 bp and 888 bp, respectively; cry64Ba and cry64Ca encoded proteins of 289 and 295 amino acids, respectively, with deduced molecular masses of 31.5 and 32.7 kDa, respectively, which agree with the protein bands observed in the spore/crystal suspension (Fig. 1A). It is worth mentioning that the two genes were adjacent to each other, with a 315-bp sequence gap between them (Fig. 2A). There is a stop codon after the cry64Ba gene and an initiation codon before the cry64Ca gene. The upstream sequences of cry64Ba and cry64Ca had predicted −10 and −35 promoter regions, respectively. A sequence (TTA CAT GTT TGT AAA ATA TGT GA) with rho-independent terminator features was found downstream of the stop codon of cry64Ca with a predicted stem-loop structure (ΔG° of −25.5 kJ/mol) followed by 10 A-T base pairs. Nevertheless, no apparent terminator sequences were found at the spacer sequence between the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes, suggesting that these two genes are cotranscribed as a single operon. RT-PCR experiments were performed to determine whether the two genes were transcribed as a single transcript. The results showed that both genes were detected as a single PCR product from a cDNA sample synthesized from total RNA of Bt 1012 when the upstream primer of cry64Ba (primer BaF) and the downstream primer of cry64Ca (primer CaR) were used (Fig. 2B, lane 3). These data indicate that the two genes are located in the same transcription unit.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Transcriptional analysis of cry64Ba and cry64Ca. (A) Shown here is a schematic diagram of distributions of cry64 genes and primers used for transcription analysis. (B) The electrophoresis pattern of the RT-PCR analysis for the cry64 operon is shown. Lane 1, fragments amplified by BaF/BaR; lane 2, fragments amplified by CaF/CaR; lane 3, fragments amplified by BaF/CaR, a PCR product that covered the gap between cry64Ba and cry64Ca. DNase-digested total RNA was used as the negative control while genomic DNA was used as the positive control. The cDNA was synthesized from total RNA and used for the transcriptional analysis.

The Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins shared 51% amino acid sequence identity with each other. Cry64Ca shared 45%, 36%, and 31% identity with Cry64Aa1, Cry33Aa1, and Cry15Aa1, respectively. A conserved ETX/MTX2 domain (PF03318) was found located at positions 57 to 270 or 33 to 266 in the Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins, respectively. The ETX/MTX2 domain is a member of the Aerolysin_ETX clan (CL0345 [http://pfam.xfam.org/clan/Aerolisin_ETX]). Multiple sequence alignments with different Cry-ETX/MTX-type Bt toxins revealed an amphipathic transmembrane β-hairpin domain flanked by two serine-rich and threonine-rich hydrophilic regions in both Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca (Fig. 3A). Phylogenetic analysis showed limited homology with the related Cry sequences analyzed (Fig. 3B). A three-dimensional (3D) structure model of Cry64Ba was generated by homology modeling according to the Cry51Aa2 3D structure (PDB code 5HD2) (Fig. 3C). Although only 24% amino acid identity between Cry51Aa2 and Cry64Ba is shared, highly similar structures were revealed with a TM score of 0.93 calculated by the TM-align server (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/TM-align/).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Sequence analysis of Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins. (A) Multiple sequence alignments of the putative transmembrane domains (TMDs) of the Cry-ETX/MTX-like Bt toxins are shown. The putative transmembrane domain was predicted by structure simulation and is indicated by a green arrow. The hydropathy profile plot of the Cry64Ba TMD is exhibited above the amino acid sequences. The hydrophilic/hydrophobic amino acids were referred to Kyte-Doolittle methodology. Serine and threonine residues in these regions are shown in blue. (B) A phylogenetic tree of Cry proteins containing the ETX/MTX2 domain is shown. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 7 using a neighbor-joining method with a bootstrap of 1,000 replications. (C) The simulated spatial 3D structure of Cry64Ba is shown. Cry51Aa2 (PDB code 5HD2) was selected as a model for homology modeling in SWISS-MODEL (global model quality estimation [GMQE] 0.63). Pink, α-helices; green, β-sheets; red, putative transmembrane segments. The structure was obtained by using PyMOL.

Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca insecticidal activity.To explore if Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca are the virulence factors of Bt strain 1012 against rice planthoppers, expression of the two genes was achieved in Bt strain HD73− (Fig. 4A). The complete putative operon of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca as well as the individual genes for each toxin were amplified from the genomic DNA of Bt 1012, cloned into the expression vector, and introduced into strain HD73−. SDS-PAGE analysis of total proteins extracted from each one of the recombinant strains indicated that these genes could produce proteins of the expected size only when they were cloned together in the same plasmid as one operon. We were incapable of detecting protein expression when these two genes were cloned separately (Fig. 4B). The Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins expressed in HD73− were extracted and purified by ion exchange followed by gel filtration chromatography, to evaluate their molecular masses (Fig. 4C). A single elution absorbance peak of the proteins appeared earlier than the peak of the bovine serum albumin (BSA) control, indicating that the Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins form a multimeric structure with a molecular mass higher than 66 kDa (Fig. 4C). The bioassays were performed with this sample containing the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca complex since the two individual proteins could not be separated.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Expression and purification of Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca in HD73−. (A) Physical maps of recombinant plasmids containing cry64Ba and cry64Ca clones. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins expressed in HD73− is shown. Lane 1, HD73−; lane 2, HD73− harboring pHT1A-64Ba; lane 3, HD73− harboring pHT1A-64Ca; lane 4, HD73− harboring pHT1A-64Ba/Ca (target bands are marked with an arrow); lane 5, purified Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins. (C) Gel filtration chromatography of purified Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins is shown. BSA (66 kDa) was used as the molecular mass standard.

The toxicity of the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca complex was evaluated against two hemipteran pests (L. striatellus and Sogatella furcifera), two lepidopteran pests (Ostrinia furnacalis and Plutella xylostella), and a coleopteran insect (Colaphellus bowringi). No lethal effect or any negative effect on growth or development was induced by Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca against the two lepidopterans or the coleopteran that was tested (Table 1 and data not shown). In contrast, toxicity against the two hemipteran pests was observed with LC50 values of 3.15 and 2.14 μg/ml against L. striatellus and S. furcifera, respectively (Table 1). The ultrastructure of L. striatellus midgut tissue was examined after feeding the insects with a dose of 5.0 μg of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca per ml of diet. Serious damage of midgut epithelial cell microvilli was observed after the treatment with these toxins (Fig. 5). In the process of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein exposure from 48 to 96 h, the damage gradually became more serious. The vacuolization of the cytoplasm was obvious at 72 h while the microvillus matrix was completely destroyed at 96 h, in contrast with the control insects that were fed with artificial diet (Fig. 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Toxicity of purified Cry64Ba-Cry64Ca against five agricultural pests

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Histopathological effect of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca in the midgut of L. striatellus. (A) Midgut tissue section of control group L. striatellus fed on pure artificial diet (96 h) is shown. Midguts from L. striatellus fed on 5.0 μg/ml Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca for 48 h (B), 72 h (C), and 96 h (D) are shown. L, lumen; MV, microvillus; EC, gut epithelial cell; MM, microvillus matrix.

Cytotoxicity of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca complex against HepG2 and red blood cells.Previously, it was reported that solubilized crystal proteins produced by five Bt strains that were isolated from samples directly collected from the rectums of cattle showed toxicity against HepG2 cells (11). Genomic analysis of these strain allowed the identification of the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes, and the authors concluded that HepG2 toxic component in these strains corresponds to the Cry64 proteins (11). We analyzed the cytotoxicity of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca purified proteins from the transformed HD73− strain against HepG2 cells. Our data showed less than 10% cell mortality when HepG2 cells were exposed to 10 μg of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca per ml while 87% cell viability was inhibited by 10 μmol/liter doxorubicin. In addition, hemolysis was also evaluated and showed no effect on red blood cells at the highest tested concentration of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca (100 μg/ml).

Binding of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins to brush border membranes from L. striatellus.Saturation and competition binding assays were performed to estimate if these two proteins have specific binding sites on brush border membranes (BBMV) from L. striatellus nymphs. Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca showed dose-dependent binding with the BBMV. Binding saturation occurred at a concentration of around 300 nmol/liter Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca, indicating a limited number of binding sites on the BBMV (Fig. 6A). Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca competed in binding of the fluorescein DyLight 488-labeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein in homologous competition assays, suggesting specific binding of Cry64 proteins to BBMV from L. striatellus. In contrast, no competition was observed when Cry1Ac was used as a competitor (Fig. 6B).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Binding assay of fluorescein-labeled Cry64Ba-Cry64Ca to BBMV of L. striatellus. (A) Saturation binding assay of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca to L. striatellus BBMV is shown. A fixed amount of BBMV proteins (10 μg) was used to bind Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca (0 to 900 nmol/liter). (B) Competition binding assay of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca to L. striatellus BBMV is shown. The binding of 50 nmol/liter labeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca to L. striatellus BBMV was tested with increased concentrations of unlabeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca or Cry1Ac as a competitor.

DISCUSSION

Cry proteins are crucial virulence factors of Bt strains. They have been subdivided into several groups, such as three-domain, ETX/MTX-like, and Bin-like toxins (12). Here, we report two ETX/MTX type Cry proteins from Bt strain 1012. The Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins presented here were successfully expressed in Bt HD73− only when they were cloned simultaneously as one operon. The coexpression protein product (Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca) showed efficient and high insecticidal activity against important sap-sucking pests (Table 1). It is unclear why the two components are essential for their high expression. One possibility is that the cotranscription of these two genes may promote the stability of the mRNA. Another possibility is that the interaction of the two proteins may stabilize their physical and chemical properties or confer resistance to endogenous protease digestion. Gel filtration chromatography showed that both Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins form a complex with a molecular size higher than 66 kDa (Fig. 4). Further investigations are needed to reveal the details of the regulation and expression of the Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca proteins.

Since it was not possible to separate these proteins, it still remains to be determined if the two proteins have toxicity separately or if they act as a binary toxin in which both components are necessary for toxicity. A bioassay performed against different insect orders indicated that Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins showed no toxicity against the lepidopterans Ostrinia furnacalis and Plutella xylostella or the coleopteran Colaphellus bowringi (Table 1). However, Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca showed significant toxicity against the rice planthoppers Laodelphax striatellus and Sogatella furcifera (Table 1). The data indicate that the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins have the highest toxicity against hemipteran pests reported so far compared to other Bt Cry proteins.

Members of the family of Cry-ETX/MTX proteins show variable toxicity against different insect species. The Cry15, Cry23, Cry33, and Cry38 toxins are toxic to coleopteran larvae, while other Cry-ETX/MTX proteins such as the Cry60 toxin are active against dipteran larvae (13, 14). The Cry51 toxin is toxic against both coleopteran and hemipteran larvae (15). Cry45Aa and Cry64Aa belong to this family, but they are also named Parasporin4A1 and Parasporin5A1 due to their toxicity against human cancer cells (15–17). Interestingly, some Cry-ETX/MTX toxins are accompanied by additional proteins. For example, the Cry15Aa toxin is associated with a 40-kDa protein, but Cry15Aa alone showed hemolytic and insecticidal activities against Manduca sexta, indicating that the 40-kDa protein is not required for toxicity (18, 19). Cry33 is produced in the same operon with a noninsecticidal 32-kDa protein named NT32KD (20). Cry23 associates with Cry37, forming a binary toxin (PDB code 4RHZ) that shows pore formation activity (21). Other examples of Cry proteins that are expressed in the same operon with additional proteins are the Cry16 and Cry17 proteins, which are expressed with two additional proteins named Cbm17.1 and Cbm17.2 in Clostridium bifermentans (22). It was shown that individual Cry16 and Cry17 proteins are not active against mosquitoes, while mosquitocidal activity was observed when the four proteins were expressed together, indicating that the four proteins are required for toxicity against Aedes aegypti (22).

At the primary sequence level, the Cry-ETX/MTX toxins share limited identity, but at the structural level, all of these proteins showed significant similarities to proteins from the aerolysin-like β-PFT group. Cry-ETX/MTX showed high similarities to the tail region of other aerolysin-like β-PFT proteins, and it has been proposed that the tail region of aerolysin-like β-PFT proteins is responsible for oligomerization and pore formation (23). In contrast, Cry-ETX/MTX showed lower structural similarities to the head region of aerolysin-like β-PFT proteins. The head region of the aerolysin-like β-PFT proteins is responsible for binding with receptors and confers toxin specificity (24). Sequence analysis and the model of the three-dimensional structure of Cry64Ba indicated that Cry64 proteins also belong to the aerolysin-type β-PFT family.

In a previous study, the cry64Ba and cry64Ca genes were found in five Bt strains that showed toxicity against HepG2 cells (11). Our data suggest that the cytotoxicity of the five Bt strains against HepG2 cells was not caused by the Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca toxins, since we found that the purified cloned proteins were not toxic to HepG2. Interestingly, Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca were not hemolytic, in contrast to most proteins of the aerolysin family (25).

In summary, we isolated Bt strain 1012 with high toxicity against rice planthoppers and identified the virulence factors as the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins. Pure Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins showed efficient and highly specific insecticidal activity against L. striatellus and S. furcifera. These Cry proteins could provide an alternative approach for integrated pest management of rice planthoppers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and plasmids.Bt strain 1012 (IPPBIOTSUC1012, China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center [CGMCC] strain 10783) was isolated from a soil sample from Baiwangshan Forest Park in Beijing and preserved at the Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IPPCAAS). Scanning electron microscopy of the spore-crystal mixture of Bt strain 1012 was performed following the process described by Shu et al. (26). The spore-crystal mixtures were washed in sterile distilled water and then resuspended in 5 volumes of solubilization buffer (50 mmol/liter Na2CO3-NaHCO3 and 50 mmol/liter EDTA; pH 10.0) for 1 h at 37°C. Then 2× Laemmli sample buffer was added, and the samples were boiled for 5 min, centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min, and loaded onto a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Escherichia coli DH5α was used for common transformation. E. coli SCS110 was used to produce the nonmethylated recombinant plasmids that were used for Bt transformation. HD73−, a Bt acrystalliferous strain, was used as the host strain for protein expression. The vector pHT-1A, which contains the pHT315 sequence, was used as the expression vector (27) linked with the promoter of cry1Ac. The attP site and ccdB gene were integrated into the plasmid for Gateway reaction and positive clone selection. All E. coli strains were cultured at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Bt strains were incubated at 30°C with shaking in 1/2 LB medium (0.5% NaCl, 0.5% tryptone, and 0.25% yeast extract). Erythromycin (Erm) and ampicillin (Amp) were used for bacterial selection at concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/ml, respectively. Erm was a selection marker for Bt strains, and Amp was a selection marker for E. coli strains.

Preparation of genomic DNA, DNA sequence, and computational analysis.Genomic DNA was extracted from Bt 1012 following the method described by Song et al. (28). The genome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The short sequence reads were assembled with SOAPdenovo (29). The open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using GeneMark (30). A local Cry toxin database was established by available quaternary rank model amino acid sequences in the list of delta-endotoxins on the Bt toxin nomenclature website (15) and used for the Bt 1012 genome toxin gene annotation by the BLASTP program with a cutoff E-value of 10−6. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the distance-based neighbor-joining method with MEGA 7.0 (31). SWISS-MODEL workspace was used to model the three-dimensional structure of Cry64Ba (32). Multiple alignments were performed by using Clustal W analysis (33). Protein structure comparison was performed by using the TM-align algorithm (34). The hydrophilic/hydrophobic amino acids were indicated by the Kyte-Doolittle method (35).

Transcriptional analysis.The promoter and terminator predictions were performed using BPROM (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=bprom&group=programs&subgroup=gfindb) and FoldRNA (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=foldrna&group=programs&subgroup=rnastruct) on SoftBerry online programs. Total RNA was extracted from Bt 1012 after 48 h cultivation on LB agar plates using TRIzol following the manufacturer's instructions. DNase digestion was carried out to avoid contamination with genomic DNA, followed by the phenol-chloroform method to isolate the total RNA. cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript RTase (TaKaRa, China) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Primers used to detect the transcription units are shown in Table 2. The thermal program of PCR was as follows: incubation at 95°C for 2 min and then 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Primers used for transcription analysis and gene cloning

Gene cloning of Bt toxins from strain 1012.The cry64 genes were amplified from Bt 1012 genomic DNA using specific primers (Table 2) with an attB1 site (5′-GGG GAC AAG TTT GTA CAA AAA AGC AGG CT-3′) and an attB2 site (5′-GGG GAC CAC TTT GTA CAA GAA AGC TGG GT-3′) added to the 5′ end of the forward and reverse primers, respectively. The fragment containing both cry64Ba and cry64Ca was amplified with the Cry64BaF and Cry64CaR primers (Table 2). Gateway BP recombination reactions between cry gene fragments and pHT-1A were performed using BP Clonase enzyme mix (Thermo Fisher, USA) following the manufacturer's instruction. The recombinant products were transformed into E. coli DH5α. Positive clones were selected and verified by a 3730xl DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Protein expression and purification.The recombinant plasmids were demethylated by transformation into E. coli strain SCS110. Purified plasmid from this strain was electroporated into Bt acrystalliferous strain HD73− for protein expression. Positive clones were selected by PCR. The method for protein extraction from recombinant strains was described by Zhou et al. (36). The recombinant strains were grown in 1/2 LB until 50% of the crystal was released. The spores and crystals were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. After being washed with 1.0 mol/liter NaCl and distilled water, the mixture was resuspended in solubilization buffer incubated on ice (shaking at 100 rpm) for 1 h. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min and then adjusted to pH 5.0 using 4.0 mol/liter sodium acetate-hydrogen acetate and kept at 4°C for 1 h. The pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 15 min, washed with distilled water twice, and dissolved in 50 mmol/liter Na2CO3 (pH 10). To purify the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca proteins, an ion-exchange chromatography was conducted with HiTrap Q HP (GE Healthcare, USA). Target proteins were eluted with a linear ion strength gradient of 0 to 0.5 mol/liter NaCl included in the protein buffer, followed by gel filtration chromatography with HiPrep 26/60 Sephacryl S-100 HR columns (GE Healthcare). BSA was used as a molecular weight standard in gel filtration chromatography. Tris-HCl (20 mmol/liter; pH 8.0) was used as the mobile phase, with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The protein concentration of the purified Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca complex was determined by ImageJ using BSA as a standard.

Bioassays.Liquid artificial diet for planthopper feeding was prepared according to Fu et al. (37). Based on the bioassay method described by Wang et al. (38), the container used in the experiment was improved in two points. First, we used a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) cylindrical bottle 7 cm in height and 4 cm in diameter with a screw cap. Two holes were opened in the bottle. The hole on the sidewall had a diameter of 6 mm and was covered with micropore tape pasted inside the bottle for ventilation; the other hole was on the cap to support the membrane-feeding package and had a diameter of 3 cm. Second, 1 ml 2% agarose gel was put on the bottom of the bottle to maintain a suitable humidity for rearing L. striatellus. Twenty L. striatellus nymphs (3rd instar) were put into the bottle. The liquid diet was replaced every 2 days. Mortality was recorded after 6 days of bioassay. The bioassay method for S. furcifera was same as above.

One-dose bioassay tests of the Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein (300 μg/g) against O. furnacalis (39), P. xylostella (40), and C. bowringi (41) were conducted as described. The newly hatched O. furnacalis moths were exposed to the semiartificial diet containing Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca toxin that was dispensed into 48-well trays. One neonate was added per well with 0.15 g testing medium and covered with a piece of wet paper under the lid. Seven days later, mortality was recorded. The leaves of cabbage (for P. xylostella) and rape (for C. bowringi) were cut into 6-cm disks, dipped into Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca solution for 10 s, air dried, and placed onto a plastic petri dish with a wet filter on the bottom to maintain humidity. Ten larvae were placed on each disk. Mortality was recorded at 48 h. All tested insects were reared at 27°C. Protein buffer (Tris-HCl at 20 mmol/liter; pH 8.0) was used as a negative control. Bioassays were repeated three times. The LC50 and 95% confidence limits (CL) were calculated by SPSS 21.0 with probit analysis.

Binding assay of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca with BBMV.The whole bodies of 3rd instar L. striatellus nymphs were used for BBMV isolation by the differential precipitation method using MgCl2 as reported (42). Quantification of total BBMV protein was done by the Bradford method (43). Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein (1 mg) was labeled with fluorescein DyLight 488 N-hydroxysuccinimide ester according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher, USA). Different concentrations (from 0 to 900 nmol/liter) of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca were added to a mixture of 10 μg BBMV in binding buffer (0.1% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) in a 100-μl final volume and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Elimination of unbound protein and detection of the amount of binding protein were done as reported by Jiang et al. (44). Briefly, after washing out the unbound protein by centrifugation, pellets containing the BBMV with the bound toxins were suspended in Laemmli sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The gel was scanned to collect green fluorescence signal (488 nm excitation [Ex]/518 nm emission [Em]) in a Typhoon 9410 scanner (GE Healthcare). The relative binding capacity is defined as the ratio of the fluorescence densitometry of binding protein to that of 50 ng labeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca. The fluorescence densitometry was read by ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) on the scanned image. The homologous competition binding assay was performed as follows: first 0 to 20,000 nmol/liter unlabeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca or trypsin-digested Cry1Ac protein was incubated with BBMV for 30 min as previously described, then 50 nmol/liter fluorescein-labeled Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein was added and incubated for 1 h. The sample was processed as described above. All of the binding experiments were repeated three times.

Histopathological examination of L. striatellus midgut.After 48, 72, and 96 h of toxin exposure of L. striatellus to Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml, the midgut tissue was dissected and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB) (0.1 mol/liter, pH 7.2) at 4°C overnight. The fixed midguts were washed with PB three times and then postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1.5 h. Samples were washed and dehydrated in graded acetone and embedded in Spurr embedding resin. Samples were sectioned at a 100-nm thickness and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Finally, the sections were examined with an HT-7700 electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan).

Cytotoxicity assay.HepG2 cells were cultured and used to test the cytotoxicity of Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca by GenScript (Nanjing, China). Cytotoxicity assays were performed in 384-well microtest plates. Each well contained 40 μl cell suspension including 800 cells. Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca was added in 2-fold serial dilutions with a highest final concentration of 10 μg/ml. After 72 h of incubation, 30 μl CellTiter-Glo (Promega, USA) was added to each well, followed by further incubation for 2 to 3 min at room temperature. Finally, the number of relative light units (RLU) was measured on a PHERAstar microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany). Tris-HCl (20 mmol/liter, pH 8.0) was used as a negative control (NC). Doxorubicin (10 μmol/liter) was used as a positive control. Cell growth inhibition was calculated as follows: % of cell growth inhibition = 100% × (1 − RLUSample/RLUNC).

Hemolysis assays.Cry64Ba/Cry64Ca protein (from 6.25 to 100 μg/ml) dissolved in PBS was mixed with 50 μl of 2% sheep erythrocyte suspension in 0.9% NaCl, and the final volume was fixed to 200 μl. After 1 h of incubation at room temperature, the cells were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min, 150 μl of the supernatant was collected, and the absorbance (Ab) was measured at 540 nm in a FlexStation 3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA). As the negative control (NC), 0.9% NaCl was used while the positive control (PC) corresponding to 100% hemolysis contained 1% Triton X-100. Percent hemolysis was calculated as follows: (Absample−AbNC)/(AbPC−AbNC) × 100%.

Accession number(s).Draft genome sequences of Bt 1012 have been deposited in GenBank under accession no. NTGL00000000. The nucleotide acid sequence data for cry64Ba and cry64Ca are available in GenBank under accession no. KC960014.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (grant 2014ZX0800912B) and National Key R&D Program of China (grant 2017YFD0200400).

We declare no competing interests.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 September 2017.
    • Accepted 6 November 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 17 November 2017.
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Raymond B,
    2. Johnston PR,
    3. Nielsenleroux C,
    4. Lereclus D,
    5. Crickmore N
    . 2010. Bacillus thuringiensis: an impotent pathogen? Trends Microbiol 18:189–194. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.02.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Schnepf E,
    2. Crickmore N,
    3. Van Rie J,
    4. Lereclus D,
    5. Baum J,
    6. Feitelson JS,
    7. Zeigler DR,
    8. Dean DH
    . 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bravo A,
    2. Gill SS,
    3. Soberon M
    . 2007. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49:423–435. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sanahuja G,
    2. Banakar R,
    3. Twyman RM,
    4. Capell T,
    5. Christou P
    . 2011. Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol J 9:283–300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00595.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chougule NP,
    2. Li H,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Linz LB,
    5. Narva KE,
    6. Meade T,
    7. Bonning BC
    . 2013. Retargeting of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cyt2Aa against hemipteran insect pests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:8465–8470. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222144110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Baum JA,
    2. Sukuru UR,
    3. Penn SR,
    4. Meyer SE,
    5. Subbarao S,
    6. Shi X,
    7. Flasinski S,
    8. Heck GR,
    9. Brown RS,
    10. Clark TL
    . 2012. Cotton plants expressing a hemipteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein impact the development and survival of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) nymphs. J Econ Entomol 105:616–624. doi:10.1603/EC11207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Palma L,
    2. Muñoz D,
    3. Berry C,
    4. Murillo J,
    5. Escudero IRD,
    6. Caballero P
    . 2014. Molecular and insecticidal characterization of a novel Cry-related protein from Bacillus thuringiensis toxic against Myzus persicae. Toxins 6:3144–3156. doi:10.3390/toxins6113144.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Porcar M,
    2. Grenier A,
    3. Federici BA,
    4. Rahbe Y
    . 2009. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4897–4900. doi:10.1128/AEM.00686-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shao E,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Chen C,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Zhuang H,
    6. Wu S,
    7. Sha L,
    8. Guan X,
    9. Huang Z
    . 2016. Loop replacements with gut-binding peptides in Cry1Ab domain II enhanced toxicity against the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Sci Rep 6:20106. doi:10.1038/srep20106.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gowda A,
    2. Rydel TJ,
    3. Wollacott AM,
    4. Brown RS,
    5. Akbar W,
    6. Clark TL,
    7. Flasinski S,
    8. Nageotte JR,
    9. Read AC,
    10. Shi X
    . 2016. A transgenic approach for controlling Lygus in cotton. Nat Commun 7:12213. doi:10.1038/ncomms12213.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ammons DR,
    2. Short JD,
    3. Bailey J,
    4. Hinojosa G,
    5. Tavarez L,
    6. Salazar M,
    7. Rampersad J
    . 2016. Anti-cancer parasporin toxins are associated with different environments: discovery of two novel parasporin 5-like genes. Curr Microbiol 72:184–189. doi:10.1007/s00284-015-0934-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Adang MJ,
    2. Crickmore N,
    3. Jurat-Fuentes JL
    . 2014. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxins and mechanism of action, p 39–88. In Dhadialla TS, Gill SS (ed), Insect midgut and insecticidal proteins. Advances in insect physiology, vol 47. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Palma L,
    2. Muñoz D,
    3. Berry C,
    4. Murillo J,
    5. Caballero P
    . 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: an overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins 6:3296–3325. doi:10.3390/toxins6123296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Zhao Q,
    3. Xia L,
    4. Ding X,
    5. Hu Q,
    6. Federici BA,
    7. Park H
    . 2013. Identification and characterization of three previously undescribed crystal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3364–3370. doi:10.1128/AEM.00078-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Crickmore N,
    2. Baum J,
    3. Bravo A,
    4. Lereclus D,
    5. Narva K,
    6. Sampson K,
    7. Schnepf E,
    8. Sun M,
    9. Zeigler DR.
    2017. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature http://www.btnomenclature.info/.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ekino K,
    2. Okumura S,
    3. Ishikawa T,
    4. Kitada S,
    5. Saitoh H,
    6. Akao T,
    7. Oka T,
    8. Nomura Y,
    9. Ohba M,
    10. Shin T
    . 2014. Cloning and characterization of a unique cytotoxic protein parasporin-5 produced by Bacillus thuringiensis A1100 strain. Toxins 6:1882–1895. doi:10.3390/toxins6061882.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Okumura S,
    2. Saitoh H,
    3. Wasano N,
    4. Katayama H,
    5. Higuchi K,
    6. Mizuki E,
    7. Inouye K
    . 2006. Efficient solubilization, activation, and purification of recombinant Cry45Aa of Bacillus thuringiensis expressed as inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 47:144–151. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.10.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Brown KL,
    2. Whiteley HR
    . 1992. Molecular characterization of two novel crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thompsoni. J Bacteriol 174:549–557. doi:10.1128/jb.174.2.549-557.1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Naimov S,
    2. Boncheva R,
    3. Karlova R,
    4. Dukiandjiev S,
    5. Minkov I,
    6. de Maagd RA
    . 2008. Solubilization, activation, and insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar thompsoni HD542 crystal proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7145–7151. doi:10.1128/AEM.00752-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kim HS,
    2. Saitoh H,
    3. Yamashita S,
    4. Akao T,
    5. Park YS,
    6. Maeda M,
    7. Tanaka R,
    8. Mizuki E,
    9. Ohba M
    . 2003. Cloning and characterization of two novel crystal protein genes from a Bacillus thuringiensis serovar dakota strain. Curr Microbiol 46:33–38. doi:10.1007/s00284-002-3801-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Donovan WP,
    2. Donovan JC,
    3. Slaney AC
    . 2000. Bacillus thuringiensis cryET33 and cryET34 compositions and uses therefor. U.S. patent 6063756A.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Qureshi N,
    2. Chawia S,
    3. Likitvivatanavong S,
    4. Lee HL,
    5. Gill SS
    . 2014. The Cry toxin operon of Clostridium bifermentans subsp. malaysia is highly toxic to Aedes larval mosquitoes. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5689–5697. doi:10.1128/AEM.01139-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bokori-Brown M,
    2. Savva CG,
    3. Fernandes da Costa SP,
    4. Naylor CE,
    5. Basak AK,
    6. Titball RW
    . 2011. Molecular basis of toxicity of Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin. FEBS J 278:4589–4601. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08140.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Moar W,
    2. Evans A,
    3. Kessenich CR,
    4. Baum JA,
    5. Bowen DJ,
    6. Edrington TC,
    7. Haas JA,
    8. Kouadio JK,
    9. Roberts JK,
    10. Silvanovich A
    . 2017. The sequence, structural, and functional diversity within a protein family and implications for specificity and safety: the case for ETX_MTX2 insecticidal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol 142:50–59.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Knapp O,
    2. Stiles BG,
    3. Popoff MR,
    4. Detrick F
    . 2010. The aerolysin-like toxin family of cytolytic, pore-forming toxins. Open Toxinology J 3:53–68. doi:10.2174/1875414701003020053.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Shu C,
    2. Liu R,
    3. Wang R,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Feng S,
    6. Huang D,
    7. Song F
    . 2007. Improving toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis strain contains the cry8Ca gene specific to Anomala corpulenta larvae. Curr Microbiol 55:492–496. doi:10.1007/s00284-007-9018-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Arantes O,
    2. Lereclus D
    . 1991. Construction of cloning vectors for Bacillus thuringiensis. Gene 108:115–119. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(91)90495-W.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Song F,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Gu A,
    4. Wu Y,
    5. Han L,
    6. He K,
    7. Chen Z,
    8. Yao J,
    9. Hu Y,
    10. Li G,
    11. Huang D
    . 2003. Identification of cry1I-type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains and characterization of a novel cry1I-type gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5207–5211. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.9.5207-5211.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Luo R,
    2. Liu B,
    3. Xie Y,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Huang W,
    6. Yuan J,
    7. He G,
    8. Chen Y,
    9. Pan Q,
    10. Liu Y,
    11. Tang J,
    12. Wu G,
    13. Zhang H,
    14. Shi Y,
    15. Liu Y,
    16. Yu C,
    17. Wang B,
    18. Lu Y,
    19. Han C,
    20. Cheung DW,
    21. Yiu SM,
    22. Peng S,
    23. Xiaoqian Z,
    24. Liu G,
    25. Liao X,
    26. Li Y,
    27. Yang H,
    28. Wang J,
    29. Lam TW,
    30. Wang J
    . 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18. doi:10.1186/2047-217X-1-18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Besemer J,
    2. Lomsadze A,
    3. Borodovsky M
    . 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kumar S,
    2. Stecher G,
    3. Tamura K
    . 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi:10.1093/molbev/msw054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Biasini M,
    2. Bienert S,
    3. Waterhouse A,
    4. Arnold K,
    5. Studer G,
    6. Schmidt T,
    7. Kiefer F,
    8. Cassarino TG,
    9. Bertoni M,
    10. Bordoli L
    . 2014. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W252. doi:10.1093/nar/gku340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Thompson JD,
    2. Higgins DG,
    3. Gibson TJ
    . 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Skolnick J
    . 2005. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2302–2309. doi:10.1093/nar/gki524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kyte J,
    2. Doolittle RF
    . 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105–132. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Yang S,
    3. Shu C,
    4. Song F,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Zhang J
    . 2015. Comparison and optimization of the method for Cry1Ac protoxin preparation in HD73 strain. J Integr Agric 14:1598–1603. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60950-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Fu Q,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Hu C,
    4. Lai F,
    5. Sun Z
    . 2001. A chemically defined diet enables continuous rearing of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool 36:111–116. doi:10.1303/aez.2001.111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Wang ZY,
    2. Lin K,
    3. Romeis J,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Peng Y
    . 2014. Use of a dietary exposure system for screening of insecticidal compounds for their toxicity to the planthopper Laodelphax striatellus. Insect Sci 21:667–675. doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. He K,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Wen L,
    4. Bai S,
    5. Ma X,
    6. Yao Z
    . 2005. Determination of baseline susceptibility to Cry1Ab protein for Asian corn borer (Lep., Crambidae). J Appl Entomol 129:407–412.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Tabashnik BE,
    2. Finson N,
    3. Chilcutt CF,
    4. Cushing NL,
    5. Johnson MW
    . 1993. Increasing efficiency of bioassays: evaluating resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 86:635–644. doi:10.1093/jee/86.3.635.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Yan G,
    2. Song F,
    3. Shu C,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Huang D,
    7. Feng S,
    8. Zhang J
    . 2009. An engineered Bacillus thuringiensis strain with insecticidal activity against Scarabaeidae (Anomala corpulenta) and Chrysomelidae (Leptinotarsa decemlineata and Colaphellus bowringi). Biotechnol Lett 31:697–703. doi:10.1007/s10529-009-9913-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wolfersberger MG,
    2. Luethy P,
    3. Maurer A,
    4. Parenti P,
    5. Sacchi F,
    6. Giordana B,
    7. Hanozet GM
    . 1987. Preparation and partial characterization of amino-acid transporting brush-border membrane-vesicles from the larval midgut of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 86:301–308. doi:10.1016/0300-9629(87)90334-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Bradford MM
    . 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Shu C,
    4. Soberón M,
    5. Bravo A,
    6. Liu C,
    7. Song F,
    8. Lai J,
    9. Zhang J
    . 2017. Holotrichia oblita midgut proteins that bind to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8-like toxin and assembly of H. oblita midgut tissue transcriptome. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00541-17. doi:10.1128/AEM.00541-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca, Two ETX/MTX2-Type Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins Active against Hemipteran Pests
Yonglei Liu, Yinglong Wang, Changlong Shu, Kejian Lin, Fuping Song, Alejandra Bravo, Mario Soberón, Jie Zhang
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2018, 84 (3) e01996-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01996-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca, Two ETX/MTX2-Type Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins Active against Hemipteran Pests
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cry64Ba and Cry64Ca, Two ETX/MTX2-Type Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins Active against Hemipteran Pests
Yonglei Liu, Yinglong Wang, Changlong Shu, Kejian Lin, Fuping Song, Alejandra Bravo, Mario Soberón, Jie Zhang
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 2018, 84 (3) e01996-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01996-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus thuringiensis
planthopper
hemipteran pests
insecticidal toxins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336