Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Assessing Performance of Spore Samplers in Monitoring Aeromycobiota and Fungal Plant Pathogen Diversity in Canada

Wen Chen, Sarah Hambleton, Keith A. Seifert, Odile Carisse, Moussa S. Diarra, Rick D. Peters, Christine Lowe, Julie T. Chapados, C. André Lévesque
Frank E. Löffler, Editor
Wen Chen
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Hambleton
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith A. Seifert
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Odile Carisse
bSaint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Québec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moussa S. Diarra
cGuelph Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rick D. Peters
dCharlottetown Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Lowe
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie T. Chapados
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. André Lévesque
aOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank E. Löffler
University of Tennessee and Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02601-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Spore samplers are widely used in pathogen surveillance but not so much for monitoring the composition of aeromycobiota. In Canada, a nationwide spore-sampling network (AeroNet) was established as a pilot project to assess fungal community composition in air and rain samples collected using three different spore samplers in the summers of 2010 and 2011. Metabarcodes of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) were exhaustively characterized for three of the network sites, in British Columbia (BC), Québec (QC), and Prince Edward Island (PEI), to compare performance of the samplers. Sampler type accounted for ca. 20% of the total explainable variance in aeromycobiota compositional heterogeneity, with air samplers recovering more Ascomycota and rain samplers recovering more Basidiomycota. Spore samplers showed different abilities to collect 27 fungal genera that are plant pathogens. For instance, Cladosporium spp., Drechslera spp., and Entyloma spp. were collected mainly by air samplers, while Fusarium spp., Microdochium spp., and Ustilago spp. were recovered more frequently with rain samplers. The diversity and abundance of some fungi were significantly affected by sampling location and time (e.g., Alternaria and Bipolaris) and weather conditions (e.g., Mycocentrospora and Leptosphaeria), and depended on using ITS1 or ITS2 as the barcoding region (e.g., Epicoccum and Botrytis). The observation that Canada's aeromycobiota diversity correlates with cooler, wetter conditions and northward wind requires support from more long-term data sets. Our vision of the AeroNet network, combined with high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and well-designed sampling strategies, may contribute significantly to a national biovigilance network for protecting plants of agricultural and economic importance in Canada.

IMPORTANCE The current study compared the performance of spore samplers for collecting broad-spectrum air- and rain-borne fungal pathogens using a metabarcoding approach. The results provided a thorough characterization of the aeromycobiota in the coastal regions of Canada in relation to the influence of climatic factors. This study lays the methodological basis to eventually develop knowledge-based guidance on pest surveillance by assisting in the selection of appropriate spore samplers.

INTRODUCTION

In agricultural systems, many crop diseases are initiated by spores of fungal pathogens (1), with air dispersal as one of the major mechanisms for spreading disease to surrounding plants (2) or over long distances, with spores remaining viable and causing outbreaks far from the source location. The use of spore samplers, especially a network of samplers at the regional scale, to directly measure air- and rain-borne inocula of fungal pathogens of crops from large, distant sources, can serve as a disease-forecasting system and is an effective way to support early warning of disease risk and to control epidemics (1, 3–7). One example of long-distance dispersal was the introduction of Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) to the United States (7), most likely by hurricane Ivan in 2004, and it was later carried to southeast Canada by prevailing winds in subsequent growing seasons as the disease became established in southern states (6). Isard et al. (7) utilized a network of rainfall samplers and developed an aerobiological model to forecast the timing of the northward spread of P. pachyrhizi, which was validated by monitoring incursions of the disease in North America through sentinel plot observations and species-specific molecular diagnosis of DNA extracts from the spore samplers. Rainfall collectors also may be useful for early warning of other fungal pathogens whose life cycle, viability, and dispersal are strongly associated with rainfall (8–11). For example, the slimy, asexual conidia of Fusarium spp. (12), Phoma exigua, and Pyrenopeziza brassicae (13, 14), as well as the zoospores of pathogens in the kingdom Stramenopiles, such as Phytophthora, Peronospora, and Pythium spp. (14, 15) (16), are often splash dispersed although these fungi may be aerially dispersed as sexual spores (ascospores or oospores) in other morphs of the same life cycles. Under extreme climatic conditions, e.g., strong wind and rain, some splash-dispersed pathogens can be disseminated over long distances (17).

Pathogens like Puccinia spp., Uromyces phaseoli, Ustilago spp., Erysiphe spp., and Drechslera spp. (16, 18) are produced in dry chains, with spores projecting above the host surface, and thus are dispersed by air currents (13). Such spores can be captured effectively by active volumetric samplers, which usually can quantify the amount of spores per volume of air but need to operate for an extended time for the detection of relatively rare spores, such as those of crop pathogens (1, 19). Installing samplers just above the crop canopy (1) and increasing the number of samplers for a larger spatial scale of monitoring may reliably monitor airborne inocula (3, 20). In one study, Carisse et al. (3) used rotating-arm air samplers to monitor the aerial conidium concentration of Botrytis leaf blight (Botrytis squamosa) and the relationship with lesion density on onion. Passive spore samplers, a third category, collect gravitational deposition from the atmosphere from both air and rain. These types of samplers are easy to operate, economical, and energy efficient (1) but do not allow calculation of spore concentrations in air as active air samplers do. All kinds of samplers may also capture fungal spores disseminated by invertebrates (19).

The choice and optimal sampling conditions (location and height) of ground-based samplers should consider the aerodynamics of the targeted fungal spores, the surrounding vegetation, meteorological conditions of sampling sites, and the desired duration of sampling (21). In particular, both rain and wind can significantly affect the dispersal and viability of all fungal spores, irrespective of which dispersal mechanism they exploit. Wind aids aerosol dispersal of spores that can be carried inside or on the surfaces of rain droplets, while rain facilitates the deposition of dry particles and provides the free water required for germination and infection. Rainfall events also provoke the detachment of spores from the host and facilitate the deposition of spores that pass through the upper atmosphere. Therefore, total precipitation during the collecting cycle can significantly affect deposition. Some climatic conditions, e.g., humidity and air temperature, affect not only the production and release of pathogen inoculum but also the susceptibility of the host (22). Other environmental conditions, such as solar and UV radiation, turbulent diffusion, and wind shear during transport, also contribute to the dispersal of fungal spores (23).

From 2007 to 2013, the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) network of air and rain samplers in five provinces monitored the south-to-north pattern of Asian soybean rust migration toward Canada using molecular probes (6). Using this approach, it was possible to detect spores of P. pachyrhizi in Canadian air well before the first and only confirmation of an infected soybean plant in Ontario (6). In recent years, high-throughput sequencing (HTS)-based approaches, including metabarcoding, shotgun metagenomics, and metatranscriptomics, demonstrated sensitive and broad taxonomic and functional coverage, which allows researchers to characterize total microbial diversity and to monitor the distribution and fluctuation of plant pathogens even at low concentrations. The metabarcoding approach utilizes DNA markers to generate a data matrix that is less complex than that using shotgun metagenomics and is popular for microbial community profiling in biodiversity studies. The objectives of this study were to generate broad-spectrum temporal and spatial baseline air- and rain-borne fungal profiles at agricultural sites in three Canadian locations (Agassiz, British Columbia [BC]; Saint-Clotilde, Quebec [QC]; and Harrington, Prince Edward Island [PEI]) using a metabarcoding approach and to evaluate the performance of the three types of spore samplers in detecting specific taxonomic groups, e.g., genera containing plant pathogens, under different meteorological conditions. Our goal was to demonstrate that spore sampling combined with HTS can be an effective approach for agricultural pest surveillance and that pathogen dispersal pathways can be monitored and inoculum potential can be determined before infected plants are found.

RESULTS

Summary of the metabarcodes.We obtained more than 6.7 million raw 454 pyro-tagged internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences with sequence lengths ranging from 325 to 725 bp. A total of 4.7 million sequences passed the quality-trimming process, with an approximately equal number of amplicons being sequenced from the ITS1 region using the ITS5 5′ primer and the ITS2 region using the ITS4 3′ primer. After chimeras and singleton operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were removed, 8,610 OTUs (referred to as ITS1_OTU) containing 1.57 million forward sequences (mainly ITS1 and 5.8S) and 8,013 OTUs (referred to as ITS2_OTU) containing 1.7 million reverse sequences (mainly 5.8S and ITS2) remained. One sample (identification [ID] code YE151W13SC_P) was removed from the downstream analyses because of low sequence count (<1,000 reads).

Putative species diversity based on different ITS regions.The number of OTUs found and shared at each sampling location and by different types of spore samplers is summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 1. Approximately 22 to 84% of the total richness represented by Chao1 index (24) was recovered for each sample (Table 1). In general, abundance is associated with higher richness but lower evenness and true diversity, indicating the discovery of rare taxa with increased sequencing depth (Fig. 2A). Based on repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant differences (HSD) post hoc tests, the total richness was higher at the beginning (sampling weeks 1 and 5) and the end (sampling week 17) of summer (June to September) but lower during the middle of the summer (sampling weeks 9 and 13) (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Expected richness (Chao1 index) of total aeromycobiota and air-/rain-borne plant pathogens in identified phyla

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(A) OTUs detected at different sampling sites and by different spore samplers. Less than one-fifth of the total OTUs can be found at both the eastern (Harrington and Sainte-Clotilde) and western (Agassiz) coasts of Canada. The two eastern locations shared two times more OTUs than either eastern location shared with the western location. At each of the sampling locations, more OTUs were found by both types of rain collectors than were found by both air and rain collectors. (B) OTUs of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota detected at different locations. More Ascomycota OTUs were shared by all three locations than those of Basidiomycota. AG, Agassiz, BC; HA, Harrington, PEI; SC, Sainte-Clotilde, QC.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

(A) Correlation analysis between mycobiota diversity indices and the climatological parameters. Total precipitation, heating degree days, and the maximum wind speed were positively correlated with fungal abundance and richness indices but negatively correlated with diversity evenness. At a significance level of 0.05, the positive correlations are filled in blue, and the negative correlations are filled in yellow. Wind direction, minimum, maximum and average daily temperatures, cooling degree days, and the number of PCR cycles had the opposite impact on diversity indices. (B) Abundance (number of sequences) and richness (number of OTUs) of each phylum and class in aeromycobiota. PCR_cycle, number of PCR cycles; Tmax, mean maximum daily temperature; Tmin, mean minimum daily temperature; Tave, mean average daily temperature; HDD, heating degree days; CDD, cooling degree days; Wdir, wind direction; Wmax, maximum wind speed; Ptot, total precipitation.

Only 23% of the total OTUs were found at both the eastern and western coasts of Canada, with more OTUs being recovered at both Harrington and Saint-Clotilde (east). A higher proportion of fungal OTUs were detected by both kinds of rain samplers (a passive wet- and dry-deposition sampler designed by J. Johnson and C. Barnes [JB] and a wet-deposition sampler from Yankee Environmental Systems [YE]) than by both YE and a continuous volumetric sampler from Burkard Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (BK) (Fig. 1A). The core mycota, defined as OTUs observed in >70% of samples from each sampling location, consisted of 23 ITS1 OTUs (0.27%) and 45 ITS2 OTUs (0.56%) but contained almost 44% of the total sequences. Only one Cladosporium OTU (ITS1_OTU 470), containing 1.1% of total sequences, was found in all samples.

Multiresponse permutation procedure (MRPP) analysis showed significant (MRPP P < 0.001) differences in the aeromycobiota communities at different sites (MRPP A = 0.043, T = −23.32) or sampled with different sampler types (MRPP A = 0.031, T = −17.32), which suggests a low within-group similarity (effect size A < 0.1) and high among-group differences (large negative value of T). Tukey's HSD tests further suggested homogeneity of dispersions among sampling locations or sampler types (P > 0.05), except for BK and YE (P = 0.0017), with higher beta-diversity among YE samples.

Taxonomic composition of air- and rain-borne fungal communities.Approximately 97% of the total sequences were assigned to four phyla, 90% were assigned to 24 classes, 86% were assigned to 100 orders, 54% were assigned to 242 families, and 61% were assigned to 841 genera. The majority of sequences were classified as Ascomycota (ca. 68.1%) and Basidiomycota (ca. 27.6%) (Fig. 2B). The remaining sequences were assigned to Zygomycota sensu lato (mostly Mucoromycota in the strict sense; 1.13%) and Chytridiomycota (0.38%). The most abundant Ascomycota classes were Dothideomycetes (82.7% of Ascomycota sequences), Leotiomycetes (7.5%), and Sordariomycetes (4.2%), while the most observed basidiomycetous classes were Tremellomycetes (30.8% of Basidiomycota sequences), Microbotryomycetes (27.9%), and Agaricomycetes (26.6%) (Fig. 2B). More Ascomycota OTUs were found at all three cities than Basidiomycota OTUs (Fig. 1B). The relative abundance and richness of Ascomycota were significantly higher in samples collected in BK and JB than in YE (p < = 0.01), but their evenness and true diversities were higher in YE and JB, while those of Basidiomycota were significantly higher in samples collected in YE than in BK and JB (Fig. S4).

Interestingly, the fungal richness recovered by ITS1 and ITS2 was significantly different for many fungal groups (Fig. 3; also see Fig. S6). For example, the average number of OTUs and relative abundance recovered by the ITS1 region were higher for Epicoccum and Ganoderma (Fig. 3A) but lower for Botrytis and Fusarium (Fig. 3B) than those recovered by the ITS2 region.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Richness of four fungal genera recovered by ITS1 and ITS2 regions. (A) Epicoccum and Ganoderma. (B) Botrytis and Fusarium. CI, confidence interval.

The shift of composition in aeromycobiota.Among all environmental conditions analyzed (Table S1 and Fig. S1 and S2), heating degree day (HDD) and wind direction to the north (Wdir) were positively correlated with daily average, minimum, and maximum temperatures (Tave, Tmin, and Tmax, respectively) but negatively correlated with cooling degree day (CDD), total precipitation (Ptot), and maximum wind speed (Wmax) (Fig. 2A; see also Fig. S2). Based on the redundancy analysis (RDA), all independent variables collectively explained 21.71% of the total variance of compositional heterogeneity, defined as the total explainable variance (EV), when wind data were included in the model (excluding samples collected from Saint-Clotilde). Collector type explained 21.4% of the EV while the sampling location explained 12.2%. Among other independent variables, 8.2% of EV was explained by sampling year, 11.5% by Tmax, 8.7% by Wmax, 7.4% by Wdir, and 6.9% by Ptot. When wind data were excluded in the analysis (including all samples), 22.32% of EV was explained. Collector type, the sampling location, and the sampling week each explained 20% of EV. Climate variables (Ptot, HDD, and CDD) collectively explained 13% of EV, and PCR cycles (PCR_cycles) explained 4.6% of EV. The joint effect of all variables resulting from colinearity was 11.5% with wind data and 11.6% without wind data. The ordination plots (ordiplots) (Fig. 4A) showed that aeromycobiota communities differed in compositional structure for samples from each coastal region. Wind speed had a higher impact on samples from Harrington than from Agassiz, while wind direction affected the air samplers more than the rain samplers. Precipitation and temperature had opposite effects on fungal community composition. A seasonal pattern of fungal community composition was also observed, with samples collected at the beginning and end of the sampling season, i.e., end of the spring and beginning of the fall, being separated (Fig. 4B).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

The redundancy analysis (RDA) plots based on the Hellinger distance of the OTU abundance matrices with (A) and without (B) wind data. Aeromycobiota were differentiated in samples collected from the east and west coasts of Canada (A and B), in samples collected from air and rain (A and B), and in samples collected at the beginning of the summer and those collected at the end of the summer (B). The two axes in plot A explained ca. 20% variance, while those in plot B explained ca. 14%. The colors represent different locations, and the shapes represent different types of spore samplers in panel A and different sampling weeks in panel B.

Fungal pathogens.A total of 4,519 ITS1 and 4,001 ITS2 OTUs were annotated by FUNGuild (25) to 61 and 59 ecological guilds, respectively, of which, 1,248 ITS1 OTUs (representing 158 genera) and 1,031 ITS2 OTUs (representing 163 genera) are considered possible, probable, or highly probable plant pathogens (178 in total). It should be noted that some of these genera are not agricultural pathogens, as shown in Table 2. Of these 178 fungal pathogenic genera, 143 were discovered by both ITS1 and ITS2, while 15 (e.g., Thekopsora and Dothistroma) by were discovered by ITS1 and 20 (e.g., Trichoderma and Magnaporthe) were discovered by ITS2 only. The most abundant genera in this list include Cladosporium (14.5%, including sequences identified as Davidiella and uncultured Cladosporium) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material), Alternaria (4.7%, including Lewia), Ganoderma (2.18%), Fusarium (2.1%, including Gibberella), Ustilago (0.64%, including Pseudozyma), Bipolaris (0.62%, including Cochliobolus), Ascochyta (0.41%), Periconia (0.19%), and Ramularia (0.12%, replaces Mycosphaerella and refers to a broader concept of the genus now prevalent [26]). In addition to Alternaria and Fusarium, other genera containing mycotoxin-producing fungi that were recovered included Aspergillus (0.087%, including Eurotium, Emericella, and several other synonymous genera), Claviceps (0.008%), Penicillium (0.094%, including Eupenicillium but excluding Talaromyces), and Stachybotrys (0.0006%). The relative abundances of selected genera collected by different samplers during the growing seasons are shown in Fig. S5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

The impacts of the types of spore samplers and other environmental variables on the recovery of selected pathogenic fungal genera determined by negative binomial generalized linear models using a rarefied community abundance matrixa

The negative binomial generalized linear regression (glm.nb) model with the log link function was used to assess the impacts of independent variables based on rarefied generic abundance matrices of both ITS1 and ITS2 sequence counts (sample size, 1,532). The result is summarized in Table 2 for 52 genera, with 38 in Ascomycota, 13 in Basidiomycota, and 1 in Chytridiomycota. Negative binomial modeling suggests that the sampler types differ in their abilities to collect members of 27 fungal plant (mainly crop) pathogens as follows: Piptoporus (wood rotting tree pathogen), Pleospora, Chalastospora, Cladosporium, Entyloma, Phellinus (wood rotting tree pathogen), Torula, Aspergillus, Drechslera (including Pyrenophora and Setosphaeria), and Mycocentrospora were collected more by BK; Knufia, Microdochium (including Monographella [27]), Devriesia, Aureobasidium, Stagonospora, Phoma, and Rhynchosporium were collected more by JB; and Podosphaera, Phaeomoniella, Ustilago (including Pseudozyma), Rhizosphaera (conifer endophyte and leaf pathogen), Powellomyces, Leptosphaeria, Itersonilia, Ganoderma (wood rotting tree pathogen in Canada and crop pathogen in the tropics), Taphrina (tree pathogen), and Fusarium were collected more by YE (Table 2, upper portion). The glm.nb model also assessed the geographic and temporal heterogeneity of pathogen distribution under the impact of weather conditions (total precipitation and maximum daily temperature), as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 5A to D. The recovery efficiencies of samplers for the 27 genera listed in the upper part of Table 2 are summarized by a mosaic plot (Fig. 5E). The width, height, and area of each tile represent the proportion of the observed frequencies that a genus was collected by a spore sampler. A chi-square test of independence showed that spore sampler types had significant impact on the recovery of many genera (P < 2.2e−16). For each tile, blue or red, respectively, represents a higher (positive) or lower (negative) level of the residuals (observations) than expected while white indicates a very small level of the residuals. Figure 6 shows the abundance predicted by glm.nb of 12 phytopathogenic fungal genera that are preferably (P < = 0.001) collected by air (top panel) or rain (bottom panel) samplers through the growing season.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

(A to D) Abundance of Leptosphaeria (A), Pleospora (B), Aureobasidium (C), and Ganoderma (D) recovered by three types of spore samplers and under different environmental conditions based on a negative binomial generalized linear regression model, summarized in Table 2. (E) Mosaic plots using HSV shading with user-defined cutoffs (0.8 and 1) based on the Pearson residuals of an independence model for rarefied community (sample size, 1,532), which was then double square root-transformed. The width and height of tiles represent the relative frequencies of spore samplers and genera. The area of each tile is proportional to the observed frequencies of the associated genus recovered by each sampler, with the left tile for BK, the middle tile for JB, and the right tile for YE in each row. The color of each tile represents the level of the residual, with blue, red, or white indicating that the level is more than, less than, or similar to observations under the null hypothesis for a test of independence. The colored tiles contribute to the significance of the chi-square test result. The genera are ordered by abundance, which is shown by the number following each generic name. The numbers following spore samplers represent total abundance of selected pathogens shown on the figure.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

The glm.nb-predicted abundance of 12 phytopathogenic fungal genera that are preferably (P < = 0.001) collected by air (top panel) or rain (bottom panel) samplers during the growing seasons. The error bars show the standard errors of the average abundance of a genus at a sampling week across all three cities and over the two growing seasons.

The types of spore samplers did not significantly impact the recovery of the fungal plant pathogens listed in the lower part of Table 2. These genera, however, were recovered differently at each sampling location or sampling time or under specific weather conditions. For example, both Bipolaris and Alternaria were recovered more at the end of the summer in the east coast cities, while Ascochyta was more prevalent in Agassiz (west coast).

DISCUSSION

Few studies have characterized the compositional structure and diversity of aeromycobiota (11, 28–34). As a major source of biological aerosols, fungal spores consist of 4 to 45% of air particulate matter with spatial and temporal distribution patterns, which can be attributed to environmental filtering, fungal life cycles, and dispersal limitations imposed by spore size (28, 30, 35–37). The spatial-temporal compositional structure of the aeromycobiota of Canada, one of the largest agricultural producers in the world, has not been well investigated. In this study, we characterized the aeromycobiota at selected sites in Canada and evaluated the performance of three types of spore samplers in collecting air- and rain-borne fungi, especially plant pathogens.

Overall, Dothideomycetes and Agaricomycetes were among the dominant classes, and a much smaller number of taxa were recovered from basal fungal lineages (e.g., Chytridiomycota), which correlates with the relative ITS amplification success rates for these taxa using standard ITS fungal primers observed by Schoch et al. (38). Other biases in diversity assessments using ITS markers may be attributed to factors such as the presence of multicopy orthologs, a lack of discrimination among cryptic taxa, the 97% identity threshold for OTU clustering, sequencing error rates, or low taxonomic coverage in reference databases, as has been evaluated and reviewed in detail previously (39–43). Our results also reflect different discriminating powers of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions or difficulties in amplifying particular taxonomic groups using ITS5/4 primers (Fig. 3). Targeted bio-surveillance of fungal pathogens using a metabarcoding approach, thus, should select the ITS region and appropriate primer sets to maximize recovery.

A higher prevalence of Ascomycota was observed in samples collected by BK and JB collectors (p < = 0.001) but not by the active rain samplers (YE) (Fig. S4). In addition, among the 16 samples where the Basidiomycota proportion was >50%, 11 were collected by active rain samplers. Such observations may reflect a collecting bias of the samplers or indicate a higher concentration of basidiospores in the rain and a higher abundance of ascospores in the air. Despite the high abundance of Ascomycota, their richness was only significantly higher than that of Basidiomycota in JB samples. One possible explanation is that JB samplers were open to collect both air and rain deposition; as spores of Basidiomycota are consistently smaller than the spores of Ascomycota (9, 44), the former thus have a better chance to be deposited and captured by JB with or without rainfall. In contrast, the filamentous growth forms of Ascomycota are smaller than those of Basidiomycota (9, 36, 45) and more easily aerosolized for long-distance dissemination. This is partially supported by the fact that the number of Ascomycota OTUs found at all three locations was approximately double that of Basidiomycota, indicating a lack of long-distance dispersal capacity for many Basidiomycota. Furthermore, air samplers performed better in capturing rare Ascomycota taxa than rain samplers, as represented by the ratio between Ascomycota and Basidiomycota evenness indices (<1.0), indicating a relatively more uniform Basidiomycota community in the air (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material).

The wide range of diversity indices and extremely low evenness, together with the fact that very few OTUs were shared by all samples, suggested a highly diversified air- and rain-borne fungal community structure over the seasons and locations. It was unsurprising that a regional distribution pattern of air- and rain-borne fungi was observed on the east and the west coasts of Canada (Fig. 1 and 4). Interestingly, however, among the Ascomycota OTUs shared by Agassiz and the two eastern sampling locations, a significantly higher proportion was detected at both Agassiz and Harrington (both coastal locations) than at both Agassiz and Saint-Clotilde (inland locations), suggesting a distinct mycobiota composition in the terrestrial versus oceanic air. Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al. (34) observed an increased ratio of airborne Ascomycota versus Basidiomycota species richness when the distance from the land to the ocean was increased, which was not revealed in our data. Such disparities may reflect different methodologies used to process and analyze the environmental samples. For instance, Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al. (34) grouped the clones of ITS amplicons based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) results and then sequenced a representative clone for each RFLP type. The proportion of fungal species revealed by this approach may be lower than that resulting from a metabarcoding approach. Indeed, the observed richness in the current study was similar to or slightly higher than that of previous studies (28, 29, 46).

In addition, at all three sampling locations, the relative abundance of Ascomycota sequences (>64%) was significantly higher than that of Basidiomycota sequences (<30%). Similar aeromycobiota composition was also observed in China during hazy days (29), in some regions in North America (36), and in marine air (34); the opposite pattern, i.e., higher richness and abundance in Basidiomycota than Ascomycota, however, was observed in the air of central Europe and over the Amazon rainforest (9, 28). These DNA-based studies reflected the total aeromycobiota compositional structure, including both viable and metabolically inactive spores and fragments of fungi, whereas the active aeromycobiota is dominated by Ascomycota, based on transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) data (9). The spatial distribution pattern and structural differences in total and active aeromycobiota suggested that both the spores and vegetative growth forms of Ascomycota are small enough to be aerosolized, while Basidiomycota may disseminate primarily in a resting spore form with minimal metabolic activity while dispersed by air (9). Studies also showed that the composition of aeromycobiota at a regional scale was correlated to, but distinctly different from, that of the local phyllosphere and soil, with a majority of community members attributed to distant sources (9, 37).

Although rain samplers collected more Basidiomycota and air samplers collected more Ascomycota, plant pathogens in these two most abundant phyla did not consistently follow the same pattern (Table 2). For example, Piptoporus, Entyloma, and Phellinus in Basidiomycota were recovered more in BK. The majority of the fungal spores, such as rust fungi (e.g., Puccinia), Alternaria, Drechslera, and Cladosporium (16, 18), depend on wind for dispersal. These fungi either were recovered more by air samplers (Cladosporium and Drechslera), or their abundance decreased in wet weather (Puccinia and Alternaria). However, smut fungi (e.g., Ustilago) and powdery mildews (e.g., Podosphaera) are also considered wind-disseminated fungi; they were collected more by rain samplers in the current study. Spores of these pathogens disseminate through wind from distant sources, but precipitation facilitates their deposition from the air (47). For spores or fragments from local sources, e.g., chasmothecia of powdery mildews on woody deciduous perennial hosts such as grapevine and lilac, water availability promotes spore production and liberation (48). These spores are dispersed by rain from infected host tissues, e.g., leaves or stems, to other substrates (49). Hydrophobins in cell walls of filamentous fungi also play an important role in surface attachment and water-mediated dispersal (50, 51). We recovered significantly more Fusarium spp. and Phoma spp. in rain samples, possibly a consequence of splash dispersal of their sticky conidia (14, 52). Some species in Fusarium, e.g., Fusarium avenaceum and Fusarium acuminatum, are highly effective ice-nucleating bio-aerosols, i.e., able to initiate ice formation at warmer temperatures (11, 51, 53), and may contribute to cloud formation and deposit through precipitation. These biological ice nuclei, including spores of rusts (e.g., Puccinia spp.) and kernel bunt (e.g., Tilletia spp.), can reach high altitudes for long-distance dissemination (54). Our findings agree with those of Kivlin et al. (37) that the dispersal of fungal spores is both a random and deterministic process. Therefore, sampling a wider vertical air column and using different collecting methods would facilitate the capture of a higher diversity of economically important fungal pathogens.

Our data further indicated that the air- and rain-borne fungal communities varied in species composition over time during the sampling season, in contrast to some culture-based studies which concluded that microfungal communities are relatively stable over a long period (47, 55). There was a clear delineation in the composition of fungal species through the sampling season each year (Fig. S3), with the fungal community usually less diverse in the middle of the summer (July) than at the beginning (end of spring) and the end (beginning of autumn) of the growing season. The temporal heterogeneity in the fungal communities was also observed by Nicolaisen et al. (56) in northwestern Europe and was often attributed to nutritional demands and survival strategies. Surrounding vegetation is particularly important for the life cycles of some plant-pathogenic fungi that are associated with particular crop or plant growth stages (57). In temperate climates, fungal species sporulate seasonally, with a flush of sexual spores of many pathogenic microfungi, such as Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Claviceps purpurea, occurring in spring when host crops are flowering and then a Basidiomycota spore flush in the autumn when winter crops emerge (58). The long- or short-distance dispersal of spores in the air or rain can be further affected by climatological conditions for growth and transportation (59). In this project, climatological parameters differed in the amount of variance they explained for air- and rain-borne fungal abundance and richness. The total precipitation (Ptot) and wind direction to the north (Wdir) had opposite effects on mycobiota diversity in comparison with those of the temperature and the maximum wind speed (Wmax), suggesting that a hot and dry summer may be unfavorable for the growth and distribution of fungi in general (Fig. 1B) (60, 61). Talley et al. (62), however, stated that high humidity is essential for growth of most mesophilic fungi and was considered a good predictor of fungal prevalence. The total variance explained by the RDA model (ca. 22%) was higher than that of Grinn-Gofroń and Bosiacka (63) (ca. 16.5%) and suggested that mean air temperature was the most important factor affecting the composition of airborne fungal spores. Overall, our results suggest that the northeast-bound winds that prevail on the North American continent during the spring and summer contribute significantly to the fungal richness and to the prevalence of fungal pathogens in Canada's air.

We summarize the collecting preference of samplers, the spatial and temporal distribution patterns, and the influence of climate conditions on the detection of 52 plant fungal pathogens in Table 2 and Fig. 5, which may guide the selection of appropriate spore samplers for crop pathogen collection. For example, Pleospora spp. were collected at significantly higher levels by BK at Agassiz (west), while Phoma spp. were recovered more by JB and YE at Harrington (east). Ustilago spp. and Leptosphaeria spp. were all recovered more by rain samplers (YE and JB); however, they did not show geographic distribution preference. Selecting the appropriate types of samplers would, therefore, increase the recovery rate of these targets. On the other hand, the type of spore sampler did not show collecting bias for genera such as Melampsora spp., Urocystis spp., Alternaria spp., and Bipolaris spp., which, however, were more abundant in either the west or the east coastal regions. Interestingly, for the powdery mildews, Erysiphe spp. were more prevalent at Agassiz, but Blumeria spp. were more abundant on the east coast, possibly a consequence of the distribution of suitable hosts.

Conclusions.We performed an exhaustive characterization of the aeromycobiota of agricultural experimental stations on the east and west coasts of Canada and one interior site. The efficiency and collection preference of spore samplers in recovering fungal pathogens from air and rain masses were addressed, providing guidelines for selecting the optimal samplers for certain taxonomic groups. The capture and analysis of plant pathogen inocula dispersed in air and rain are powerful tools for assessing disease potential, thus assisting in plant pathology studies, as well as in national biovigilance monitoring and pest management efforts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of air and rain samples and associated climatological data.Spore-sampling equipment was used to collect air and rain samples at three agricultural experimental stations operated by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), located at Agassiz, BC, Sainte-Clotilde, QC, and Harrington, PEI. The three sampling locations in the study have roughly similar latitudes although Agassiz (west) and Harrington (east) are coastal, while Saint-Clotilde (east) is more inland (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Three different samplers were installed at each site: a continuous volumetric sampler ([BK] the Cyclone sampler for field operation; Burkard Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Rickmansworth, England), an automated wet-deposition sampler ([YE] Model TPC-3000 total precipitation collector; Yankee Environmental Systems, Inc., Turners Falls, MA, USA), and a passive wet- and dry-deposition sampler made in-house ([JB] designed in 2004 by J. Johnson and C. Barnes at USDA-ARS for monitoring Asian soybean rust). All rain samplers were installed on the ground in the middle of a field of growing crops, while BK samplers were installed about four feet above ground. The BK instrument is a non-filter-based system for sampling air-dispersed particulate matter, which is collected directly into a sterile 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube in the field. Particle size is in the 1-μm range. BK samplers normally collected airborne dry particles but often trapped moisture, and samples were then treated as wet samples. The YE instrument collects wet deposition into a collection bucket only during precipitation events. It is expected to capture spores that are removed from the air by precipitation or by water splash from nearby plants and less likely to capture spores in moving air currents. A moisture sensor triggers the opening and closing of the bucket lid. The collected rainwater was filtered in the lab by vacuum filtration through a 47-mm disposable filter funnel equipped with a 0.45-μm-pore-size cellulose nitrate filter (Whatman catalog no. 1920-1441; Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario, Canada) to collect spores and other particulate matter. The JB unit consists of a 17-inch-diameter plastic funnel mounted on a pole, which is open at all times to wet and dry deposition. Rain was filtered directly in the field through a filter assembly unit (same make and filter pore size as used for the YE samples) attached to the base of the funnel. Particulate matter deposited in the funnel as dry deposition was washed down onto the filter during rain events. Occasionally at some sites during weeks with heavy rain or strong wind events, the 0.45-μm-pore-size JB filter became plugged, and the extra water in the filter unit was brought to the lab to be filtered and combined with the rest of the sample.

Collectors were installed for 17 weeks from June to September in 2010 and 2011, i.e., from June 1 (initial setup) to September 28 (last collection day) in 2010 and from May 31 to September 27 in 2011. Samples were collected after 7 days of exposure in the field. Five samples were collected each year (weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17). Some weeks had no precipitation and therefore no YE sample: Agassiz, weeks 5 and 9 in 2010 and week 13 in 2011; Harrington, week 17 in 2011; Saint-Clotilde, week 5 in 2010 and week 1 in 2011. A total of 98 air and rain samples were collected from Agassiz (n = 30), Harrington (n = 34), and Saint-Clotilde (n = 34).

Climatological data, obtained from Environment and Climate Change Canada's meteorological service (http://climate.weather.gc.ca/), included temperature-associated variables (in degrees Celsius) such as average temperature (Tave), minimum temperature (Tmin), maximum temperature (Tmax), heating degree day (HDD) and cooling degree day (CDD), wind direction (Wdir, number of degrees from north) and maximum speed (Wmax, in kilometers/hour), and total precipitation (Ptot, in millimeters). Cooling degree day is defined as the demand for energy to cool a building and is derived from subtracting a base temperature, e.g., 18°C, from the daily average temperature. The heating degree day is defined as the demand for energy to heat a building and is calculated by subtracting daily average temperature from a base temperature. A summary of metadata for the 98 samples can be found in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

Sample processing and genomic DNA extraction.Samples (YE precipitation, JB filter assembly units, and BK microcentrifuge tubes) were collected by collaborators at each location and shipped by overnight courier to the Hambleton lab at AAFC Ottawa for next-day processing. After the YE water was filtered in the lab, the YE and JB filters were removed from the filter assembly units and cut in half. One half was stored as a frozen voucher at −80°C. The other half was accordion folded and placed in a 1.5-ml tube with 800 μl of 10 mM Tris buffer, incubated at 65°C for 5 min, sonicated for 1 min two times to release trapped particles from the filter pores, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 2 min to concentrate the particles. The filter paper was then removed from the tube, and the remaining buffered sample was dried down in a Savant DNA 120 SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNAs of spiked YE and JB samples with known quantities of Puccinia graminis spores were extracted using different commercial kits, including a PowerSoil kit (Mo Bio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and OmniPrep kit (G-Biosciences, St. Louis, MO, USA). The amount of P. graminis DNA in the extracts was quantified using quantitative PCR (qPCR) (64), which demonstrated that the filter processing and DNA extraction methods were effective for spore recovery (data not shown). Because BK samples were collected directly in Eppendorf tubes, they were processed according to the procedures listed above, excluding the filter removal steps required for the JB/YE samples. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the dried filtrate samples individually using an OmniPrep kit (G-Biosciences, St. Louis, MO, USA) for the BK and YE samples or a PowerSoil kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) for the JB samples, which trapped various amounts of soil particles as dry deposition. The result from each sample was a mixed pool of DNA extracted from any species present in the sample (e.g., fungal spores, bacterial cells, pollen, etc.). The extracted DNA was stored at −80°C.

PCR and 454 pyrosequencing.Genomic DNA extracted from environmental samples was diluted to 1/10 and 1/100 dilutions to reduce the effects of PCR inhibitors. The universal fungal ITS primers, ITS5 (forward, GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG) and ITS4 (reverse, TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC), were fused with a unique 10-nucleotide barcode for multiplexing samples. Products of eight replicate reactions for each PCR library were pooled to limit the effects of PCR bias and increase the detectable biodiversity in each sample. Partial fusion primers were developed to avoid individual adaptor ligations within each amplicon library. These primers combine our standard universal primer sets with unique 10-base multiplex identifier (MID) adaptors (Roche) (Table S1). The PCR and 454 pyrosequencing reactions and conditions were described previously by Chen et al. (65). The 454 pyrosequencing technology was used because other sequencing platforms either were unavailable or when this study began in 2009 could produce only very short sequences.

Classification and analysis of pyrosequencing data.The 454 pyrosequencing data were processed using the bioinformatics pipeline described by Chen et al. (65) with the following modifications. (i) Raw sequences of each sample were separated based on the sequencing direction and labeled as forward (sequenced from the ITS5 5′ primer end) or reverse (sequenced from the ITS4 3′ primer end) during the demultiplexing step; reverse sequences were reverse complements of the original orientation. (ii) Quality-trimmed forward and reverse sequences were subjected to chimera checking and then clustered at 97% similarity. Forward sequences contained mainly ITS1 and 5.8S regions and are referred to as ITS1; reverse sequences contained mainly ITS2 and 5.8S regions and are referred to as ITS2. (iii) The OTUs were classified by the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier (66) using the UNITE (User-friendly Nordic ITS Ectomycorrhiza) fungal ITS database (version 7.0, release date 1 August 2015) as the reference database with a confidence level of 0.8. The forward and reverse sequences formed OTU tables that are referred to as ITS1_OTU and ITS2_OTU, respectively. Some generic names in the taxonomic lineages in the OTU tables were replaced by accepted generic names, including those imposed by the recent adoption of a single-name nomenclature for fungi (67), before downstream analysis was performed (Table S2) (65). For example, Mycosphaerella was replaced by Ramularia (26), and Monographella was replaced by Microdochium (27). Because of the rapid rollout of some of these taxonomic changes, however, some recently accepted synonymies may not have been implemented in the pipeline and are not included in Table S2. Other genera, such as Acremonium, remain phylogenetically unresolved and undoubtedly polyphyletic. Although we have done our best to correct these inconsistencies in our pipelines, the occurrence or cooccurrence of these names in some tables and figures is an unavoidable consequence of the volume of data, the numbers of taxa being processed, and the different taxonomies accepted at the times when some analyses were run. OTUs were classified to functional groups using FUNGuild (25).

All statistical analyses were done in the R environment. Because ITS1_OTU and ITS2_OTU were formed by amplicons from different regions of the ITS barcodes, diversity indices of putative species (OTUs) were calculated for each OTU table separately. R packages vegan (68), BiodiversityR (69), HierDiversity (70, 71), and RAM (72) were used for community diversity analysis. The correlation among diversity indices and numeric independent variables were calculated using the R function cor. To examine how the aeromycobiota diversity changed through the sampling season, we used the lme function in the R package nlme (73) to perform the repeated measures of ANOVA (PMANOVA) analysis, with diversity indices of each type of sampler at each location being compared at five time points (week). The PMANOVA model was further subjected to post hoc tests using the glht function in the R package multcomp (74) to examine if diversity was different between sampling weeks. The OTUs were combined for the calculation of a taxonomic abundance matrix (TAM) at each taxonomic rank. OTUs and TAM were Hellinger transformed and then standardized with means equaling to zero, unless otherwise stated. To compare the richness for selected fungal groups at each taxonomic rank recovered by ITS1 and ITS2, we used the R function wilcox.test. To examine the beta-diversity of fungal communities, the function cca in the vegan package was used to perform the redundancy analysis (RDA). The samples from Saint-Clotilde were excluded from RDA when the wind data were included from modeling because wind data were missing for this location in both sampling seasons.

To investigate the impacts of independent variables on the detection of plant pathogens, we used the glm.nb function in the R package MASS (75) for negative binomial linear regression modeling of genus abundance (rarefied to a sample size of 1,532), using the log link function. The categorical variables include spore samplers, locations, and sampling week and year, while the numeric variables include total precipitation and maximum daily temperature, which were standardized to zero mean and unit variance. The q values were adjusted from P values generated by likelihood ratio statistics using the false discovery rate. Statistically significant q values were set at 0.05/50 = 0.001. To visualize the chi-square hypothesis test of independence of sequence counts and categorical variables (e.g., sampler types and geographic location), the mosaic function in the R package vcd (76) was used. Mosaic plots were generated using hue-saturation-value (HSV) shading (77) with user-defined cutoffs (0.8 and 1) based on the Pearson residuals of an independence model for double square root-transformed rarefied community (sample size, 1,532). R packages RAM (72), reshape2 (78), lattice (79), corrplot (80), and ggplot2 (81) were used for manipulating OTU tables and visualization.

Accession number(s).All ITS metabarcoding sequences are available through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under study accession number SRP095430 and BioSample accession numbers SRS1872326 to SRS1872422.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all field staff in the teams of Albert Tenuta, Moussa Diarra, Rick Peters, and Odile Carisse for their vital support in setting up the original spore-trapping network, maintaining sites, and collecting samples. We thank Kathryn Temple and Post-Secondary CO-OP/Internship students Elizabeth Begley, Geneviève Moreau, and William Derks for technical help with the DNA extractions. We also thank Christopher Lewis and all members of the former Microbial Biodiversity Bioinformatics group at AAFC for help with processing large amounts of raw metabarcodes. The technical assistance of high-throughput sequencing service provided by the Plant Biotechnology Institute of the National Research Council of Canada is graciously acknowledged.

This work was financially supported by the Sustainable Agriculture Environmental Systems Initiative of the Growing Forward framework at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC). The computational infrastructure was partially supported by Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada funding (proposal numbers 97, 1134, and 1136), the Canadian Safety and Security Program (project CRTI 09-462RD/CSSP 30vv01), and the Genomics Research and Development Initiative Quarantine and Invasive Species project.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 November 2017.
    • Accepted 15 February 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 23 February 2018.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02601-17.

  • © Crown copyright 2018.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. West J,
    2. Kimber R
    . 2015. Innovations in air sampling to detect plant pathogens. Ann Appl Biol 166:4–17. doi:10.1111/aab.12191.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gregory PH
    . 1962. The microbiology of the atmosphere. Soil Sci 94:349. doi:10.1097/00010694-196211000-00013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Carisse O,
    2. Savary S,
    3. Willocquet L
    . 2008. Spatiotemporal relationships between disease development and airborne inoculum in unmanaged and managed Botrytis leaf blight epidemics. Phytopathology 98:38–44. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-98-1-0038.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Úrbez-Torres JR,
    2. Bruez E,
    3. Hurtado J,
    4. Gubler WD
    . 2010. Effect of temperature on conidial germination of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Plant Dis 94:1476–1484. doi:10.1094/PDIS-06-10-0423.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. O'Gorman CM,
    2. Fuller HT
    . 2008. Prevalence of culturable airborne spores of selected allergenic and pathogenic fungi in outdoor air. Atmos Environ 42:4355–4368. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tenuta A,
    2. Hambleton S,
    3. Devitt C
    . 2008. Soybean rust spores found in Ontario. CropPest Ontario 13:1–2.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Isard S,
    2. Barnes C,
    3. Hambleton S,
    4. Ariatti A,
    5. Russo J,
    6. Tenuta A,
    7. Gay D,
    8. Szabo L
    . 2011. Predicting soybean rust incursions into the North American continental interior using crop monitoring, spore trapping, and aerobiological modeling. Plant Dis 95:1346–1357. doi:10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Morris C,
    2. Sands D,
    3. Glaux C,
    4. Samsatly J,
    5. Asaad S,
    6. Moukahel A,
    7. Goncalves FLT,
    8. Bigg E
    . 2013. Urediospores of rust fungi are ice nucleation active at > −10 °C and harbor ice nucleation active bacteria. Atmos Chem Phys 13:4223–4233. doi:10.5194/acp-13-4223-2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Womack A,
    2. Artaxo P,
    3. Ishida F,
    4. Mueller R,
    5. Saleska S,
    6. Wiedemann K,
    7. Bohannan B,
    8. Green J
    . 2015. Characterization of active and total fungal communities in the atmosphere over the Amazon rainforest. Biogeosciences 12:6337–6349. doi:10.5194/bg-12-6337-2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pummer B,
    2. Atanasova L,
    3. Bauer H,
    4. Bernardi J,
    5. Druzhinina I,
    6. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J,
    7. Grothe H
    . 2013. Spores of many common airborne fungi reveal no ice nucleation activity in oil immersion freezing experiments. Biogeosciences 10:8083–8091. doi:10.5194/bg-10-8083-2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J,
    2. Kampf CJ,
    3. Weber B,
    4. Huffman JA,
    5. Pöhlker C,
    6. Andreae MO,
    7. Lang-Yona N,
    8. Burrows SM,
    9. Gunthe SS,
    10. Elbert W,
    11. Su H,
    12. Hoor P,
    13. Thines E,
    14. Hoffmann T,
    15. Després VR,
    16. Pöschl U
    . 2016. Bioaerosols in the earth system: climate, health, and ecosystem interactions. Atmos Res 182:346–376. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Keller MD,
    2. Bergstrom GC,
    3. Shields EJ
    . 2014. The aerobiology of Fusarium graminearum. Aerobiologia 30:123–136. doi:10.1007/s10453-013-9321-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gilles T,
    2. Fitt BD,
    3. McCartney H,
    4. Papastamati K,
    5. Steed J
    . 2001. The roles of ascospores and conidia of Pyrenopeziza brassicae in light leaf spot epidemics on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the UK. Ann Appl Biol 138:141–152. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00096.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fitt BD,
    2. McCartney H,
    3. Walklate P
    . 1989. The role of rain in dispersal of pathogen inoculum. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:241–270. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.27.090189.001325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kuske C,
    2. Benson D
    . 1983. Survival and splash dispersal of Phytophthora parasitica, causing dieback of rhododendron. Phytopathology 73:1188–1191. doi:10.1094/Phyto-73-1188.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Deacon JW
    . 2005. Fungal biology, 4th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd., Malden, MA.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Perryman SAM,
    2. Clark SJ,
    3. West JS
    . 2014. Splash dispersal of Phyllosticta citricarpa conidia from infected citrus fruit. Sci Rep 4:6568. doi:10.1038/srep06568.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Aylor DE
    . 1990. The role of intermittent wind in the dispersal of fungal pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:73–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.28.090190.000445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jackson S,
    2. Bayliss K
    . 2011. Spore traps need improvement to fulfil plant biosecurity requirements. Plant Pathol 60:801–810. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02445.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Van der Heyden H,
    2. Lefebvre M,
    3. Roberge L,
    4. Brodeur L,
    5. Carisse O
    . 2014. Spatial pattern of strawberry powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis) and airborne inoculum. Plant Dis 98:43–54. doi:10.1094/PDIS-10-12-0946-RE.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Khattab A,
    2. Levetin E
    . 2008. Effect of sampling height on the concentration of airborne fungal spores. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 101:529–534. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60293-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. West JS,
    2. Atkins SD,
    3. Fitt BD
    . 2009. Detection of airborne plant pathogens; halting epidemics before they start. Outlooks Pest Manag 20:11–14. doi:10.1564/20feb05.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Del Ponte EM,
    2. Esker PD
    . 2008. Meteorological factors and Asian soybean rust epidemics: a systems approach and implications for risk assessment. Sci Agric 65:88–97. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162008000700014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Chao A
    . 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791. doi:10.2307/2531532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nguyen NH,
    2. Song Z,
    3. Bates ST,
    4. Branco S,
    5. Tedersoo L,
    6. Menke J,
    7. Schilling JS,
    8. Kennedy PG
    . 2016. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol 20:241–248. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Videira S,
    2. Groenewald J,
    3. Braun U,
    4. Shin H-D,
    5. Crous P
    . 2016. All that glitters is not Ramularia. Stud Mycol 83:49–163. doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2016.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hernández-Restrepo M,
    2. Groenewald JZ,
    3. Crous PW
    . 2016. Taxonomic and phylogenetic re-evaluation of Microdochium, Monographella and Idriella. Persoonia 36:57–82. doi:10.3767/003158516X688676.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J,
    2. Pickersgill DA,
    3. Després VR,
    4. Pöschl U
    . 2009. High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12814–12819. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811003106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yan D,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. Su J,
    4. Zhao L-L,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Fang X-M,
    7. Zhang Y-Q,
    8. Liu H-Y,
    9. Yu L-Y
    . 2016. Diversity and composition of airborne fungal community associated with particulate matters in Beijing during haze and non-haze days. Front Microbiol 7:487. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00487.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Zhu C,
    2. Kawamura K,
    3. Fukuda Y,
    4. Mochida M,
    5. Iwamoto Y
    . 2016. Fungal spores overwhelm biogenic organic aerosols in a midlatitudinal forest. Atmos Chem Phys 16:7497–7506. doi:10.5194/acp-16-7497-2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zoppas BCDA,
    2. Valencia-Barrera RM,
    3. Duso SMV,
    4. Fernández-González D
    . 2006. Fungal spores prevalent in the aerosol of the city of Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, over a 2-year period (2001–2002). Aerobiologia 22:117–124. doi:10.1007/s10453-006-9022-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Egan C,
    2. Li D-W,
    3. Klironomos J
    . 2014. Detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores in the air across different biomes and ecoregions. Fungal Ecol 12:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2014.06.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Peay KG,
    2. Bruns TD
    . 2014. Spore dispersal of basidiomycete fungi at the landscape scale is driven by stochastic and deterministic processes and generates variability in plant–fungal interactions. New Phytol 204:180–191. doi:10.1111/nph.12906.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J,
    2. Burrows S,
    3. Xie Z,
    4. Engling G,
    5. Solomon P,
    6. Fraser M,
    7. Mayol-Bracero O,
    8. Artaxo P,
    9. Begerow D,
    10. Conrad R
    . 2012. Biogeography in the air: fungal diversity over land and oceans. Biogeosciences 9:1125–1136. doi:10.5194/bg-9-1125-2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Gilbert GS,
    2. Reynolds DR
    . 2005. Nocturnal fungi: airborne spores in the canopy and understory of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 37:462–464. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00061.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Després V,
    2. Huffman JA,
    3. Burrows SM,
    4. Hoose C,
    5. Safatov A,
    6. Buryak G,
    7. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J,
    8. Elbert W,
    9. Andreae M,
    10. Pöschl U
    . 2012. Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 64:15598. doi:10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kivlin SN,
    2. Winston GC,
    3. Goulden ML,
    4. Treseder KK
    . 2014. Environmental filtering affects soil fungal community composition more than dispersal limitation at regional scales. Fungal Ecol 12:14–25. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2014.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Schoch CL,
    2. Seifert KA,
    3. Huhndorf S,
    4. Robert V,
    5. Spouge JL,
    6. Levesque CA,
    7. Chen W,
    8. Bolchacova E,
    9. Voigt K,
    10. Crous PW
    . 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:6241–6246. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117018109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Aylagas E,
    2. Borja A,
    3. Irigoien X,
    4. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N
    . 2017. Benchmarking DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity-based monitoring and assessment. Front Mar Sci 3:96.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Sinclair L,
    2. Osman OA,
    3. Bertilsson S,
    4. Eiler A
    . 2015. Microbial community composition and diversity via 16S rRNA gene amplicons: evaluating the Illumina platform. PLoS One 10:e0116955. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116955.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Links MG,
    2. Chaban B,
    3. Hemmingsen SM,
    4. Muirhead K,
    5. Hill JE
    . 2013. mPUMA: a computational approach to microbiota analysis by de novo assembly of operational taxonomic units based on protein-coding barcode sequences. Microbiome 1:23. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. De Boer SH,
    2. Li X,
    3. Ward LJ
    . 2012. Pectobacterium spp. associated with bacterial stem rot syndrome of potato in Canada. Phytopathology 102:937–947. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-04-12-0083-R.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Cuadros-Orellana S,
    2. Leite LR,
    3. Smith A,
    4. Medeiros JD,
    5. Badotti F,
    6. Fonseca PL,
    7. Vaz AB,
    8. Oliveira G,
    9. Góes-Neto A
    . 2013. Assessment of fungal diversity in the environment using metagenomics: a decade in review. Fungal Genom Biol 3:110.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Yamamoto N,
    2. Bibby K,
    3. Qian J,
    4. Hospodsky D,
    5. Rismani-Yazdi H,
    6. Nazaroff WW,
    7. Peccia J
    . 2012. Particle-size distributions and seasonal diversity of allergenic and pathogenic fungi in outdoor air. ISME J 6:1801–1811. doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Moore D,
    2. Robson GD,
    3. Trinci AP
    . 2011. 21st Century guidebook to fungi. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Barberán A,
    2. Ladau J,
    3. Leff JW,
    4. Pollard KS,
    5. Menninger HL,
    6. Dunn RR,
    7. Fierer N
    . 2015. Continental-scale distributions of dust-associated bacteria and fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5756–5761. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420815112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Li D-W,
    2. Kendrick B
    . 1995. A year-round outdoor aeromycological study in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Grana 34:199–207. doi:10.1080/00173139509429043.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Grinn-Gofroń A,
    2. Strzelczak A
    . 2011. The effects of meteorological factors on the occurrence of Ganoderma sp. spores in the air. Int J Biometeorol 55:235–241. doi:10.1007/s00484-010-0329-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Gadoury DM,
    2. Asalf B,
    3. Heidenreich MC,
    4. Herrero M,
    5. Welser M,
    6. Seem RC,
    7. Tronsmo AM,
    8. Stensvand A
    . 2010. Initiation, development, and survival of cleistothecia of Podosphaera aphanis and their role in the epidemiology of strawberry powdery mildew. Phytopathology 100:246–251. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-100-3-0246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Whiteford JR,
    2. Spanu PD
    . 2001. The hydrophobin HCf-1 of Cladosporium fulvum is required for efficient water-mediated dispersal of conidia. Fungal Genet Biol 32:159–168. doi:10.1006/fgbi.2001.1263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Sesartic A,
    2. Lohmann U,
    3. Storelvmo T
    . 2013. Modelling the impact of fungal spore ice nuclei on clouds and precipitation. Environ Res Lett 8:014029. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014029.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. David RF,
    2. BozorgMagham AE,
    3. Schmale DG, III,
    4. Ross SD,
    5. Marr LC
    . 2016. Identification of meteorological predictors of Fusarium graminearum ascospore release using correlation and causality analyses. Eur J Plant Pathol 145:483–492. doi:10.1007/s10658-015-0832-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. O'Sullivan D,
    2. Murray BJ,
    3. Ross JF,
    4. Whale TF,
    5. Price HC,
    6. Atkinson JD,
    7. Umo NS,
    8. Webb ME
    . 2015. The relevance of nanoscale biological fragments for ice nucleation in clouds. Sci Rep 5:8082. doi:10.1038/srep08082.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.↵
    1. Haga D,
    2. Iannone R,
    3. Wheeler M,
    4. Mason R,
    5. Polishchuk E,
    6. Fetch T,
    7. Kamp B,
    8. McKendry I,
    9. Bertram A
    . 2013. Ice nucleation properties of rust and bunt fungal spores and their transport to high altitudes, where they can cause heterogeneous freezing. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:7260–7272. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50556.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Fierer N
    . 2008. Microbial biogeography: patterns in microbial diversity across space and time, p 95–115. In Zengler K (ed), Accessing uncultivated microorganisms: from the environment to organisms and genomes and back. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  56. 56.↵
    1. Nicolaisen M,
    2. West JS,
    3. Sapkota R,
    4. Canning GGM,
    5. Schoen C,
    6. Justesen AF
    . 2017. Fungal communities including plant pathogens in near surface air are similar across northwestern Europe. Front Microbiol 8:1729. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01729.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Miller R,
    2. Lodge D
    . 1997. Fungal responses to disturbance: agriculture and forestry, p 65–84. In Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (ed), The mycota. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  58. 58.↵
    1. West JS,
    2. Atkins SD,
    3. Emberlin J,
    4. Fitt BD
    . 2008. PCR to predict risk of airborne disease. Trends Microbiol 16:380–387. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.05.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Hirst J,
    2. Stedman O
    . 1967. Long-distance spore transport: methods of measurement, vertical spore profiles and the detection of immigrant spores. J Gen Microbiol 48:329–355. doi:10.1099/00221287-48-3-329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Hernandez Trejo FH,
    2. Munoz Rodriguez A,
    3. Tormo Molina R,
    4. Silva Palacios I
    . 2013. Airborne spores of Basidiomycetes in Merida (SW Spain). Ann Agric Environ Med 20:657–663.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Calderon C,
    2. Lacey J,
    3. McCartney H,
    4. Rosas I
    . 1995. Seasonal and diurnal variation of airborne basidiomycete spore concentrations in Mexico City. Grana 34:260–268. doi:10.1080/00173139509429055.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    1. Talley SM,
    2. Coley PD,
    3. Kursar TA
    . 2002. The effects of weather on fungal abundance and richness among 25 communities in the Intermountain West. BMC Ecol 2:7. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-2-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Grinn-Gofroń A,
    2. Bosiacka B
    . 2015. Effects of meteorological factors on the composition of selected fungal spores in the air. Aerobiologia 31:63–72. doi:10.1007/s10453-014-9347-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Liu M,
    2. McCabe E,
    3. Chapados JT,
    4. Carey J,
    5. Wilson SK,
    6. Tropiano R,
    7. Redhead SA,
    8. Lévesque CA,
    9. Hambleton S
    . 2015. Detection and identification of selected cereal rust pathogens by TaqMan real-time PCR. Can J Plant Pathol 37:92–105. doi:10.1080/07060661.2014.999123.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Turkington TK,
    3. Lévesque CA,
    4. Bamforth JM,
    5. Patrick SK,
    6. Lewis CT,
    7. Chapados JT,
    8. Gaba D,
    9. Tittlemier SA,
    10. MacLeod A
    . 2016. Geography and agronomical practices drive diversification of the epiphytic mycoflora associated with barley and its malt end product in western Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 226:43–55. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.030.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Garrity GM,
    3. Tiedje JM,
    4. Cole JR
    . 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. doi:10.1128/AEM.00062-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. McNeill J,
    2. Barrie F,
    3. Buck W,
    4. Demoulin V,
    5. Greuter W,
    6. Hawksworth D,
    7. Herendeen P,
    8. Knapp S,
    9. Marhold K,
    10. Prado J
    . 2012. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne code). Regnum Veg 154:208.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.↵
    1. Oksanen J,
    2. Blanchet FG,
    3. Friendly M,
    4. Kindt R,
    5. Legendre P,
    6. McGlinn D,
    7. Minchin PR,
    8. O'Hara RB,
    9. Simpson GL,
    10. Solymos P,
    11. Stevens MHH,
    12. Szoecs E,
    13. Wagner H
    . 2017. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-3. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
  69. 69.↵
    1. Kindt R,
    2. Coe R
    . 2005. Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
  70. 70.↵
    1. Marion Z,
    2. Fordyce J,
    3. Fitzpatrick B
    . 2015. HierDiversity: hierarchical multiplicative partitioning of complex phenotypes. R package version 0.1. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hierDiversity.
  71. 71.↵
    1. Jost L
    . 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Lévesque CA,
    3. Simpson J
    . 2017. RAM: R for amplicon-sequencing-based microbial-ecology. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria. http://cran.r-project.org/package=RAM.
  73. 73.↵
    1. Pinheiro J,
    2. Bates D,
    3. DebRoy S,
    4. Sarkar D,
    5. Core Team R
    . 2016. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
  74. 74.↵
    1. Hothorn T,
    2. Bretz F,
    3. Westfall P
    . 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    1. Venables WN,
    2. Ripley BD
    . 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York, NY.
  76. 76.↵
    1. Meyer D,
    2. Zeileis A,
    3. Hornik K
    . 2006. The Strucplot framework: visualizing multi-way contingency tables with vcd. J Stat Softw 17:1–48. doi:10.1360/jos170001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Zeileis A,
    2. Meyer D,
    3. Hornik K
    . 2007. Residual-based shadings for visualizing (conditional) independence. J Comput Graph Stat 16:507–525. doi:10.1198/106186007X237856.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  78. 78.↵
    1. Wickham H
    . 2007. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw 21:1–20. doi:10.18637/jss.v021.i12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. 79.↵
    1. Sarkar D
    . 2008. Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. Springer, New York, NY.
  80. 80.↵
    1. Wei T
    . 2013. Corrplot: visualization of a correlation matrix. R package version 0.73. R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corrplot.
  81. 81.↵
    1. Wickham H
    . 2009. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Assessing Performance of Spore Samplers in Monitoring Aeromycobiota and Fungal Plant Pathogen Diversity in Canada
Wen Chen, Sarah Hambleton, Keith A. Seifert, Odile Carisse, Moussa S. Diarra, Rick D. Peters, Christine Lowe, Julie T. Chapados, C. André Lévesque
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Apr 2018, 84 (9) e02601-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02601-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Performance of Spore Samplers in Monitoring Aeromycobiota and Fungal Plant Pathogen Diversity in Canada
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing Performance of Spore Samplers in Monitoring Aeromycobiota and Fungal Plant Pathogen Diversity in Canada
Wen Chen, Sarah Hambleton, Keith A. Seifert, Odile Carisse, Moussa S. Diarra, Rick D. Peters, Christine Lowe, Julie T. Chapados, C. André Lévesque
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Apr 2018, 84 (9) e02601-17; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02601-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

air- and rain-borne fungi
high-throughput sequencing
HTS
metabarcodes
plant fungal pathogens
spore sampler

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336