Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

Microbial Communities of Orange Tubercles in Accelerated Low-Water Corrosion

Hoang C. Phan, Scott A. Wade, Linda L. Blackall
Shuang-Jiang Liu, Editor
Hoang C. Phan
aFaculty of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hoang C. Phan
Scott A. Wade
aFaculty of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda L. Blackall
bSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuang-Jiang Liu
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00610-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The rapid degradation of marine infrastructure at the low tide level due to accelerated low-water corrosion (ALWC) is a problem encountered worldwide. Despite this, there is limited understanding of the microbial communities involved in this process. We obtained samples of the orange-colored tubercles commonly associated with ALWC from two different types of steel sheet piling, located adjacent to each other but with different levels of localized corrosion, at a seaside harbor. The microbial communities from the outer and inner layers of the orange tubercles and from adjacent seawater were studied by pure culture isolation and metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA genes. A collection of 119 bacterial isolates was obtained from one orange tubercle sample, using a range of media in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. The metabarcoding results showed that sulfur and iron oxidizers were more abundant on the outer sections of the orange tubercles compared to the inner layers, where Deltaproteobacteria (which include many sulfate reducers) were more abundant. The microbial communities varied significantly between the inner and outer layers of the orange tubercles and also with the seawater but overall did not differ significantly between the two steel sheet types. Hence, we saw similar microbial communities in orange tubercles present, but different levels of localized corrosion, for two different types of colocated steel sheet piling. Metallurgical analysis found differences in composition, grain size, ferrite-pearlite ratio, and the extent of inclusions present between the two steel types investigated.

IMPORTANCE The presence of orange tubercles on marine steel pilings is often used as an indication that accelerated low-water corrosion is taking place. We studied the microbial communities in attached orange tubercles on two closely located sheet pilings that were of different steel types. The attached orange tubercles were visually similar, but the extents of underlying corrosion on the different steel surfaces were substantially different. No clear difference was found between the microbial communities present on the two different types of sheet piling. However, there were clear differences in the microbial communities in the corrosion layers of tubercles, which were also different from the microbes present in adjacent seawater. The overall results suggest that the presence of orange tubercles, a single measurement of water quality, or the detection of certain general types of microbes (e.g., sulfate-reducing bacteria) should not be taken alone as definitive indications of accelerated corrosion.

INTRODUCTION

Microbiologically/microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) refers to the deterioration of materials due to the presence of microbes and/or biofilms attached to the surface (1). A special case of MIC is accelerated low-water corrosion (ALWC), which is associated with the rapid corrosion of metallic structures at the low-tide water level (Fig. 1) (2). The corrosion rates due to ALWC can be up to several millimeters/year compared to around 0.05 mm/year which is typical for steel in seawater in non-ALWC situations (3). Untreated ALWC can lead to significant degradation of steel support structures and subsequent loss of structural integrity. ALWC is often indicated by orange tubercles that form on the surface of the steel at the low-tide water level. The tubercles consist of a combination of corrosion products and complex microbial biofilms, including microbes deemed responsible for the corrosion. Beneath the visible orange surface of the tubercle, a black layer is commonly observed and, when removed, exposes a bright shiny steel surface with localized pitting indicating corrosion. By studying the microbes present in the orange tubercles associated with ALWC, it is hoped that a better understanding of the mechanisms involved can be gained, and hence improvements in detection and corrosion prevention can be made.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(A) Steel sheet piling being inspected. (B) Orange tubercles on steel sheet piling just below the water level. (C) Schematic diagram of ALWC. (D) Schematic diagram of microbes and layers of orange tubercles.

Biofilms of cells from various microbial species and their extracellular polymeric substances can form on metal surfaces that can subsequently lead to MIC via a range of processes. The exact corrosion mechanisms involved in MIC are likely to depend on the microbes present and environmental conditions. Changes in the chemistry at the metal-solution interface due to metabolic by-products and the direct withdrawal of electrons from the metal are the two most commonly proposed degradation mechanisms (4–6). Since the microbial communities involved in MIC are complex and can change spatiotemporally as the organisms adapt to survive in habitats with fluctuating substrate availabilities, it is likely that multiple processes take place that lead to the rapid corrosion associated with MIC. For example, sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation (parts of the sulfur cycle) are hypothesized to be key mechanisms in accelerated low water corrosion (7, 8).

A wide variety of microbes exist in marine environments, many of which can colonize surfaces to form biofilms (9). ALWC occurs on surfaces at the low-tide level, where the biofilm is predominantly immersed, but also has periods of exposure above the water level. A small number of studies have investigated the microbial communities present on steel structures in relation to ALWC. One such study (7) found differences between the inner (dominated by sulfate-reducing bacteria [SRB]) and outer layers (dominated by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria [SOB]) of ALWC tubercles, while another reported a diverse community of bacteria and archaea with a dominant group of methanogenic archaea (10). It is important to note that while they are often linked as being key to MIC, SRB have been found at both sites with normal (i.e., not accelerated) low-water corrosion, as well as those with ALWC. However, a higher diversity of SRB, as well as specific genera of SRB, has been reported to be present at ALWC locations compared to normal low-water corrosion sites (11). There have also been a number of previous attempts to isolate microbes from ALWC tubercles for use in additional (e.g., corrosion) studies, although typically the microbes isolated have not correlated well with the dominant microbes found in community analysis (7, 12, 13).

One of the other factors that potentially affects the likelihood and location of ALWC is the metallurgy of the sheet piling. Several reports (2) indicate a preference for ALWC to occur in the center of the out pans of U-profile sheet piling. There are also suggestions that older sheet piling may be more susceptible to ALWC (14). Melchers et al. (14) proposed that both of these effects may be due to differences in steel segregation and composition at the center of the steel sample for the older steel types. However, others report that steel type, and by extension steel composition, did not seem to be a factor for ALWC (2). At least one major steel sheet pile manufacturer markets a sheet piling steel grade with a chemical composition that apparently has been specifically designed to reduce ALWC (15).

In this study, we performed a detailed characterization of the microbial communities present in orange tubercles at the low-tide level on two different types of adjacent steel sheet piling. The overall hypothesis of this work was that the microbial communities present in different layers of an orange tubercle, in the nearby seawater and on different areas of the steel structure (with or without orange tubercles, for different steel types, with or without corrosion attack underneath tubercles) would be significantly different. To examine this, we carried out 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding of biomass from the inner and outer layers of numerous tubercles, steel surfaces without tubercles present, and the nearby seawater. One orange tubercle sample, with a pitting interface, was also used to isolate bacteria, which were identified by Sanger sequencing their 16S rRNA genes and phylogenetic analysis. Metallurgical studies of the two different steel types characterized the composition and microstructure of the steels.

RESULTS

Seawater parameters.The values of selected measured environmental parameters of the seawater from close proximity to the steel sheet piling, are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material, which are reasonably typical for seawater. Of specific interest to ALWC are the dissolved inorganic nitrogen levels. The concentration of ammonia was very low (0.02 mg/liter), and the nitrate and nitrite levels were below the levels of detection (<0.02 mg/liter).

Steel composition analysis.The elemental composition of the two different steel types was found to be within the standard ranges used in structural-grade carbon steels (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). For the majority of the elements, the differences in percentages between the old and new sheet piling steels were relatively minor, apart from the copper levels, where the old steel type only had 0.01 wt%, while the new type had 0.33 wt%.

Examples of the microstructure of the two steel types are given in Fig. 2. The grain sizes of the old steel type (mean intercept length, ∼13 μm) were larger than the grain sizes of the new steel type (mean intercept length, ∼7 μm). Both steel types had a mixed pearlite/ferrite microstructure, with obvious banding in the old steel type. The ferrite-pearlite ratios of the old steel and the new steel were found to be 33 to 67% and 23 to 77%, respectively. An increased level of inclusions was observed for the old steel type (∼0.7%) compared to the new steel (0.4%). Measurements for each of the aforementioned microstructural parameters were made through the cross section of each of the samples, and no obvious variations were found as a function of measurement location.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Microstructure images of the two sheet piling steel types from Australian Iron and Steel, Port Kembla, Australia (old, A and B), and ArcelorMittal, Luxembourg (new, C and D), at different magnifications, showing the pearlite phase (black grains) and ferrite phase (white grains).

Pitting/localized corrosion of sheet piling.Pitting, i.e., localized corrosion of the metal surface, was observed beneath certain orange tubercles (e.g., see Fig. 3 and S2) and in some cases was estimated to be up to a few centimeters in depth (Fig. S3). There was extensive pitting present under all tubercles removed from the old steel type (Fig. S3A to D, G, and H), whereas the new steel type was relatively smooth and devoid of cavities (Fig. S3E and F).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Photographs of examples of orange tubercles (top) and cleaned steel surfaces (bottom) for the two different steel sheet piling types Australian Iron and Steel (Port Kembla) steel sheet piling (left, pitting/old steel) and ArcelorMittal (Luxembourg) steel sheet piling (right, nonpitting/new steel).

Microbial communities: metabarcoding.The phylum-level microbial communities of the various samples investigated are presented in Fig. 4A. The most dominant phylum was Proteobacteria, which made up between 47.3 and 86.2% of the microbes detected in individual samples. Bacteroidetes were present at reasonable levels in most of the samples tested, being highest in the seawater (29.6%) and lowest (1.1%) in the nonpitting inner 2 sample. The archaeal phyla detected included Euryarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota, but they were recorded at relatively low levels across the different orange tubercle samples, ranging from undetected to ∼20%, while none were present in the seawater. Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria were detected at 4.4 and 6.3%, respectively, in the seawater, but were detected at <1% in all but one of the tubercle samples. The combination of “unassigned and others” (phyla detected at levels of <0.5%) comprised between 8.9 and 36.5% of the detected microbes in individual samples.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

(A) Microbial communities of different samples at the phylum level as determined by metabarcoding. Others, including phyla with levels identified to be <0.5% in all samples and unassigned phyla, were grouped into “unassigned and others.” (B) Major phylum/class bacterial groups plotted for the different sample locations (with “unassigned and others” removed). The data from the two test locations for each steel type have been averaged to help simplify presentation.

To illustrate the distribution of microbial communities present in the different regions of the orange tubercles as a function of steel type, the results obtained for individual tubercles tested for the two steel types were averaged and plotted in Fig. 4B, together with the seawater results for comparison. For this figure, the Proteobacteria were expanded to the class level, while the “unassigned and others” (here defined as phyla detected at levels of <0.5%) were removed from Fig. 4B. Alphaproteobacteria were more dominant in the seawater (38.5%), with the relative proportions lower in the outer tubercle layer and then further reduced in the inner layer closest to the steel (∼10%). Similar trends of reducing abundance from seawater through to the inner layer of the tubercles were observed for the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Cyanobacteria. In general, the outer layers of the tubercles had increased levels of Betaproteobacteria and Zetaproteobacteria, while the inner layers tended to be dominated by Deltaproteobacteria (∼50%). Gammaproteobacteria showed slight changes in proportion across the seawater and outer samples (∼10%) with a decrease in the inner layers (∼2%).

The within-sample rarefaction (alpha diversity), as determined by QIIME using the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) table, is shown as the basis of phylogenetic diversity whole tree and Shannon’s metrics and plotted in Fig. S4A. The sequencing depth was considered to be good for each sample as it reached the samples’ richness. The rarefied OTU table was run by a matrix of distances among all samples, which is illustrated in the principal coordinates (Fig. S4B). A comparison of the community compositions was performed with 1,000 permutations using the Bray-Curtis metric. Significant differences (R > 0.7, P < 0.05) were shown by the analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) R statistic in samples (i.e., inner, outer, or seawater) and sources (i.e., pitting inner/outer, nonpitting inner/outer, or seawater), but not significant in terms of the type of steel on which the tubercles were located (i.e., pitting/old steel type or nonpitting/new steel).

A heat map produced at the microbial family level (including 77 microbial families) was integrated with a clustering dendrogram using Pearson’s correlation and built in METAGENassist. The results showed some distinct groupings occurred for the different sample locations. For example, the Desulfobacteraceae and Desulfovibrionaceae were present in the inner layers of the orange tubercles, but there was a negative correlation for these families in both the tubercle outer layers and seawater. Further details are provided in Fig. S5 in the supplemental material.

To provide information at the genus level, the taxa present in the five sample locations at levels of ≥1% are plotted in Fig. 5. Specific taxa that were consistently identified at the species levels across all of the five sample locations are provided on the right-hand side of the bars (Fig. 5). All taxa present at levels of <1% were grouped together and plotted as a single group called “minor taxa” to show their relative abundance. In general, the nonpitting inner and nonpitting outer samples had less diverse microbial compositions than those of pitting inner and pitting outer samples, respectively.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Percentages of families and/or genera/species present in the various sampling locations and layers (see code in figure) according to metabarcoding. Note that pitting occurred below orange tubercles on the old type steel, while the new type steel did not show pitting beneath orange tubercles.

The most dominant genera present in the seawater sample were Phaeocystidibacter, Roseivivax halodurans, and species of the families Flavobacteriaceae and Rhodobacteraceae, while the outer layers of the tubercles had high levels of Methanococcus aeolicus (an archaean), Mariprofundus ferrooxydans, Burkholderia multivorans, and Lutimonas (Fig. 5). The inner layers of the tubercles of both steel types contained a range of Deltaproteobacteria (lower eight taxa in Fig. 5) with relatively high proportions of Desulfobacula toluolica, Desulfovibrio sp., Desulfotignum sp., and a species of each of families Desulfobulbaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae.

In comparing microbes from the inner tubercle layers on both steel types (old and new), D. toluolica and species of Desulfobulbaceae were less abundant on the old steel type than on the new. Conversely, more Desulfovibrionaceae species and Mariniphaga (Bacteroidetes) were in the inner layers of the old steel type compared to the new steel. Rhodobacteraceae species were present in higher proportions on the old steel compared to new, and Prolixibacter bellariivorans and Sulfurospirillum were present only on the old steel. B. multivorans was clearly more abundant on the old steel, while M. aeolicus was present at greater levels on the new steel.

METAGENassist was used to provide the putative phenotypes of the microbes identified by metabarcoding, and a summary of the results is presented in Fig. 6. However, the functions of the majority of microbes (∼60%) from each sample were unknown. Overall, the six most dominant traits identified were sulfate reduction, ammonia oxidation, dehalogenation, nitrite reduction, nitrogen fixation, and sulfide oxidation. Generally higher metabolic function percentages were in the pitting rather than in nonpitting tubercles and more in the inner layers compared to outer layers for tubercles on both steel types. In particular, sulfate reduction was greater in the seawater and inner layers than the outer layers of the tubercles, ammonia oxidation was lowest in nonpitting tubercles, and there was little difference in sulfide oxidization among corrosion layers. Across the samples, dehalogenation and nitrogen fixation were highest in the pitting inner layer.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Putative functions of OTUs obtained for the various test locations, as analyzed by METAGENassist.

Isolation of microbial pure cultures.A total of 119 pure culture bacterial isolates were obtained from a combination of the inner and outer layers of an orange tubercle from one of the pitting/old steel locations. These isolates produce a culture collection which can be used in subsequent laboratory-based corrosion tests. The phylogeny of the isolates is shown in a circular phylogenetic tree in Fig. 7, including details of close relative identities. Further details, including the relative abundance percentages of each genus based on plate counts, are provided in Table S2 in the supplemental material. For both aerobic and anaerobic culturing conditions, a more diverse bacterial population was isolated from the outer layer, which also had a higher total relative abundance of bacteria (according to plate counts) compared to the inner layer. Bacillus was the most dominant genus of bacteria isolated aerobically, while Mariniphaga and Prolixibacter (all were P. bellariivorans) and Clostridium were the most common genera isolated anaerobically. The different culturing conditions (medium composition and atmosphere) would have influenced the isolates acquired. The majority (∼95%) of the isolates could grow on either marine agar (MA) or R2A-SS, while one isolate each of Sphaerochaeta and Yeosuana (an aerobe) was isolated only on thioglycolate agar (THA+). In aerobic cultivation, MA and R2A-SS collectively facilitated a greater diversity of microbes compared to other media. The addition of lactate and ferrous ammonium sulfate to growth media (TSA+ and MA+) facilitated the isolation of fewer bacteria which could be due to the media being more selective.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree created with MEGA7 for 16S rRNA sequences of bacteria isolated from tubercle layers on a pitting old steel. Evolutionary distances were analyzed using bootstrap test results from 2,000 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are noted after isolate codes and before the names of reference sequences.

DISCUSSION

Physicochemical properties of seawater.The major water parameters analyzed in this study were within the ranges of those reported in a previous study examining the water quality of region close to the area we studied (16). Others have proposed a link between the concentration of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) present in seawater and likelihood of ALWC (17). In our test (albeit one-off), the measured DIN levels were quite low (0.02 mg/liter), which based on the aforementioned theory would suggest a reduced likelihood of ALWC. However, we clearly observed pitting, which directly correlated with corrosion (Fig. 3), underneath orange tubercles on the old steel type.

Steel microstructure.We found a clear difference in the extent of pitting (i.e., localized corrosion) beneath orange tubercles for two different steel types that are located adjacent to each other and installed at the same time. That we saw little difference in the microbial communities present in the tubercles on the two different steel types suggests that something to do with the steel properties has possibly influenced the corrosion process. Previous work has shown that banding of the steel microstructure (18) and MnS inclusions (19) can be the cause of increased levels of localized corrosion of steel. Banding and increased levels of inclusions were observed for the old grade of steel which had increased corrosion. Another factor that may potentially affect the likelihood of ALWC is the steel composition, although there are differing reports on this (2, 15, 20). While some differences were found in the compositions of the two steels investigated (e.g., increased levels of copper in the steel without the pitting), they are relatively small, and the potential of copper alone to reduce ALWC is not clear (20). Given the number of variables in play, further work is required to determine which, if any, of these material properties are responsible for the increased levels of corrosion in the old steel type.

Microbes analyzed by metabarcoding and METAGENassist.The tubercles formed had clear differences in the microbial communities in the different layers (regardless of steel type), which were also clearly different to the microbes present in adjacent seawater in this study. The bacterial compositions determined by metabarcoding at the phylum level in this study were similar to those in a previous study, in which the rust layers from steel plates immersed in coastal seawater for 6 months and 8 years were examined (21). In particular in the latter samples (steel exposed for 8 years in seawater) and in ours (steel immersed for 7 years in seawater), Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the abundant phyla of bacteria (Fig. 4); the Firmicutes levels, however, were higher in samples from Li et al. (21) compared to our samples.

An earlier study of the microbes on seawater-immersed steel coupons (22) generated results that concurred with our findings of relatively few archaea compared to bacteria overall (Fig. 4A), and bacterial communities clustered by tubercle location (inner and outer) and water (Fig. 4B). Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria distributions (with abundance changing from high in seawater through to the lowest in the tubercle inner layer) concurred between the studies. Some differences, however, were also observed with Bacteroidetes distributions, for example, being high in seawater through to lowest in the tubercle inner layer in our study (Fig. 4), but the opposite being reported previously (22).

There were some similarities between our bacterial findings and a third MIC study (23), particularly with similar abundances of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. In general, other studies have reported more Firmicutes (Li et al. [21], Celikkol-Aydin et al. [22]; mostly Defulfotomaculum) and sometimes more Actinobacteria (22, 23), compared to our results, but the Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes are abundant phyla in all of these studies.

There are several potential reasons for the variations in microbial communities in corrosion samples, including different local environmental conditions (e.g., nutrients, temperature, and other water compounds), water flux (24) and immersion times, which influence specific marine microbial communities (21, 25). Less diverse microbial communities have been reported with increasing immersion time (6 months versus 8 years; Li et al. [21]). The structures studied in our work had been immersed for ∼7 years prior to sampling and the microbial diversity was similar to that in the 8-year sample previously reported (21).

It has been suggested (26) that algae and then cyanobacteria are primary terrestrial biofilm colonizers, and data from Celikkol-Aydin et al. (22) add credence to the notion that these organisms could be primary colonizers in marine metallic corrosion settings. We did not specifically investigate algae, and our cyanobacteria were largely only in the seawater sample. Our tubercles were likely mature biofilms (the steel was in place for ∼7 years), making initial colonizers unfeasible to comment on.

Several microbial phenotypic properties were suggested from the METAGENassist analysis. Of particular note are aspects of sulfur (sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation) and nitrogen (nitrogen fixation, ammonium oxidation, and nitrite reduction) cycling in pitting and nonpitting samples from the inner and outer regions of the tubercles (Fig. 6). The seawater microbes were enriched for many of these phenotypes and often more so than the tubercle samples, e.g., sulfate reduction and ammonium oxidation. Sulfur cycling, especially the sulfate reduction component, is well known with respect to MIC and indeed is frequently deemed a critical phenotype for this type of corrosion. METAGENassist showed a trend for more sulfate reducers in inner regions of both pitting and nonpitting tubercles compared to respective outer regions (Fig. 6). This phenotype was high in the seawater and the likely source of ALWC/MIC sulfate reducers, as our previous research could not confirm their source to be adjacent sediments (12). A METAGENassist created heat map shows a positive correlation for Desulfovibrionaceae and Desulfobacteraceae (recognized sulfate reducers) in inner samples compared to a negative correlation of these families of bacteria in outer and seawater samples (Fig. S5).

Sulfate-reducing prokaryotes have been widely implicated and studied in ALWC/MIC (5). Desulfovibrio spp. have previously been suggested to be a main cause of corrosion by the direct electron transfer mechanism (27), and both our pitting and nonpitting inner samples contained this genus, other members of Desulfovibrionaceae and other known sulfate reducers (Desulfarculus baarsii, Desulfotignum sp., Desulfobulbaceae, and Desulfobacula toluolica) (Fig. 5). METAGENassist supports the hypothesis that sulfate reduction is a potential microbial phenotype in the inner zones of our collected tubercles. According to metabarcoding, our nonpitting inner samples had more sulfate reducers compared to the pitting samples (Fig. 5), but METAGENassist showed the potential for slightly more sulfate reduction in pitting samples compared to nonpitting samples (Fig. 6). As such, in this work corrosion could not be directly correlated with putative sulfate reducers, as determined by both metabarcoding or METAGENassist. This finding is at odds with the general status in the ALWC/MIC field of a direct relationship between sulfate reduction and corrosion and therefore warrants more research to provide clarity.

The sulfur cycle could have involved the sulfur respirer Pelobacter sp. (Desulfuromonadaceae), which is of marine origin (28) and was found in all inner and outer samples (Fig. 5). The sulfur oxidizers Thioprofundum sp. (Gammaproteobacteria) and Sulfurospirillum sp. (Epsilonproteobacteria) were largely in outer tubercle samples compared to inner or seawater (Fig. 5). High levels of sulfide oxidation were found in the seawater according to METAGENassist (Fig. 6), but since we could not identify seawater bacteria with this phenotype, this warrants further investigation.

The most abundant archaeon detected was the marine methanogen Methanococcus aeolicus (Euryarchaeota) in the nonpitting inner and outer locations, and it was detected in lower abundance in the pitting inner sample (Fig. 5). Methanococcus and Methanothermococcus were abundant archaea detected in rust samples on steel surfaces immersed in seawater (10, 23). There was an inverse relationship between these archaeal genera and location in the rust, with high Methanococcus levels in the outer layers and high Methanothermococcus levels in the inner layers (23). The marine ammonium oxidizer Nitrosopumulis maritimus (Thaumarchaeota) was present in low abundance in inner and outer samples. These have been reported from MIC settings (23), but their exact role in corrosion in non-oil pipeline locales is yet to be explored. The phenotypes of methanogenesis and ammonium oxidation are possibly important to corrosion processes.

Microbial pure cultures.All of the media used here to isolate pure cultures were generally nonselective, but they varied in their nutrient (R2A is a low-nutrient medium relative to the others) and salt levels (all but TSA+ were prepared to seawater salinity with Red Sea salt [RSS], but TSA+ has 0.5% NaCl). We used the seawater salinity isolation media so that the broadest spectrum of marine organisms could be obtained. The supplements to TSA, THA, and MA were used to enhance the isolation of anaerobes and, in particular, TSA+ for sulfate reducers. This could have provided a selective aspect since substantially less bacteria grew on MA+ compared to MA. Our specific use of TSA+ as the medium to facilitate isolation of SRB was unsuccessful. Indeed, we isolated no SRB or facultative SRB (e.g., Vibrio spp.) from any medium despite good proportions of potential SRBs (Deltaproteobacteria) being detected, particularly in the pitting inner samples, from metabarcoding. Lanneluc et al. (13) using similar methods as ours with 8-week-immersed metal coupon biofilms also did not isolate SRB. These bacteria are considered to play a main role in corrosion (5), and the isolation of corrosion-associated SRB is a high priority to allow use in future MIC/ALWC studies.

We isolated bacteria from five phyla (in abundance order): Firmicutes (many Bacillus spp.), Proteobacteria (mostly Ensifer adhaerens [Alphaproteobacteria] and three different Microbulbifer spp. [Gammaproteobacteria]), Bacteroidetes (mostly Prolixibacter bellariivorans and Mariniphaga spp.), Actinobacteria (at least nine different genera and species), and Spirochaetes (Sphaerochaeta sp.). This is a similar diversity of pure cultured bacteria reported from rust samples on steel that had been immersed in seawater for 8 years (25) and in seawater for up to 8 weeks (13). Our former four phyla are consistent with those reported by Li et al. (25) and Lanneluc et al. (13), but one isolate, Sphaerochaeta sp., is unique to our work, is novel for corrosion environments, and justified the use of THA+ medium from which our Sphaerochaeta sp. was isolated. Most Sphaerochaeta spp. are reported to come from freshwater or gut ecosystems but the anaerobic, psychrophilic, marine Sphaerochaeta multiformis was sourced from subseafloor sediments collected near Japan in the northwestern Pacific Ocean (29). However, the closest bacterium to our strain was S. pleomorpha (from freshwater sediment) with 89.1% identity, and S. multiformis was 87.1% identical. Thus, our Sphaerochaeta sp. strain is likely a novel genus.

Most of our isolates were Bacillus spp., specifically B. algicola and B. aquimaris, despite extremely few sequences from this genus present in our metabarcoding data. It could be that the Bacillus spp. were present in our corrosion samples as spores, which could have eluded lysis in our protocol, thus leading to few sequences from them in metabarcoding. Others have also isolated Bacillus spp. in abundance from corrosion samples. Lanneluc et al. (13) studied metal coupons immersed in seawater for 8 weeks and used MA to find that 38% of isolates were Firmicutes (class Bacilli), most of which were Bacillus spp. More relevant to our work, due to a similar marine water immersion time of 7 to 8 years, Li et al. (25) found Bacillus spp. to be abundantly isolated organisms, but not present in their metabarcoding data (30). Bacillus spp. have been reported to have different roles in corrosion, ranging from promoting to inhibiting corrosion. Bacillus spp. can produce extracellular polymeric materials (EPS) which bind metal ions, leading to anodic dissolution and promotion of corrosion (31). Conversely, Bacillus brevis inhibits corrosion by producing antibiotics against SRB and iron-oxidizing bacteria (32). The true abundance of Bacillus taxa in MIC needs to be clarified and, if the taxa are found to be abundant, then their specific roles need to be clarified.

Microbulbifer spp. are known manganese oxidizers (33), and bacteria with this phenotype are associated with the corrosion of iron and steel (34). They also could be common surface colonizers contributing to initial MIC biofilm development as reported for several bacterial families, including Alteromonadaceae (Microbulbifer) (35).

MA+ was very successful in isolating our only candidate of Alphaproteobacteria, Ensifer adhaerens, which grew both aerobically and anaerobically. Ensifer spp. are common surface colonizers (36) and have a symbiotic relationship with Bacillus, where they can promote Bacillus spore germination and receive vital nutrients that are produced during spore activation (37). These and other phenotypic features [e.g., As(III) oxidation (38) and nitrogen fixation (39)] may explain the ubiquity of E. adhaerens in our samples.

Prolixibacter bellariivorans cells grew on all media under anaerobic incubation and most were from the pitting outer sample. Mariniphaga spp. were mainly isolated anaerobically on MA from both pitting inner and outer samples. Both these genera are in the Prolixibacteraceae family in the Bacteroidetes. Prolixibacter have been reported to be anaerobic iron oxidizers using nitrate reduction (40, 41). The role of Mariniphaga in ALWC has yet to be determined. All other Bacteroidetes isolates were in the family Flavobacteriaceae, whose members have been reviewed as primary colonizers in MIC (9) and from which isolates were reported from other MIC studies (13, 25).

Overall, we found that there were clear differences in the microbial communities in different layers (i.e., inner and outer layers) of orange tubercles. There was, however, no significant difference between the microbial communities of orange tubercles located above corroded steel sheet piling and those tubercles with little-to-no corrosion underneath. Hence, the identification of the presence of orange tubercles alone is insufficient evidence to conclude that an ALWC problem is present. The results suggest that a combination of microbial and metallurgical factors is likely required for ALWC to take place.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling.Orange tubercles (∼7-mm thickness, ∼60- to ∼100-mm diameter) which had formed at the low tide water level on a steel sheet piling wall in a marine harbor in Port Philip Bay, Victoria, Australia, were sampled (Fig. 3; see Fig. S1 to S3 in the supplemental material). The sheet piling studied consisted of two different steel types (one manufactured by Australian Iron and Steel, Port Kembla, Australia [old steel], and the other by ArcelorMittal, Luxembourg [new steel] [see analysis method below]) of U-piles connected together to form a single ∼80-m straight length. The wall was constructed in 2009, and duplicate tubercles were sampled in 2016 from each of the two different steel types, making a total of four sampling locations.

When the orange tubercles were removed, bright shiny pitted steel was observed beneath the old steel type and samples acquired were called pitting 1 and pitting 2 (Fig. 3; see Fig. S1 to S3). The steel below the new steel type had no pitting (i.e., localized corrosion) and a dark-black appearance, and samples acquired from this region were called nonpitting 1 and nonpitting 2 (Fig. 3; see Fig. S1 to S3). Each orange tubercle was sampled in a manner that allowed separate specimens of the outer bright orange, thick layer (called “outer,” ∼1-cm3 samples) and inner black, thin layer (called “inner,” ∼0.2-cm3 samples) to be obtained (Fig. 3). An ethanol-disinfected spoon (Fig. 3) was used to scrape the samples into 50-ml polycarbonate tubes (Falcon), which were then filled with seawater. All sample tubes were kept on ice during transportation to the laboratory. Seawater adjacent to the sheet piling was collected into a 20-liter plastic container for microbial analysis. Orange tubercles were observed on “in” and “out” pans of the U-pile sheets, with all samples in this work taken from “in-pan” areas.

At the laboratory, three 500-ml aliquots of well-mixed seawater taken from the field were filtered through a 0.22-μm mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (Merck Millipore) using sterile techniques. The filter was stored at –80°C prior to further testing. Tubercle inner and outer samples were homogenized individually using a paddle mixer (Stomacher) at normal speed for 2 min. The final samples were aliquoted into sterile 15-ml polycarbonate (Falcon) tubes. One aliquot of each sample was kept at 4°C for DNA extraction (1.8 ml) undertaken the following day. The remaining tubes were stored at –80°C.

Physicochemical measurements were taken on site for temperature, pH (HI98185; Hanna Instruments), conductivity (HI8733; Hanna Instruments), and dissolved oxygen concentration (HI9146; Hanna Instruments). A range of other water quality parameters were determined by a commercial environmental testing laboratory (Eurofins, Melbourne, Australia).

Sheet piling.The steel U-pile sheets from two different sources were studied. One was repurposed from a previous harbor structure, which was manufactured by Australian Iron and Steel (Port Kembla) to an AIS 72-lb/ft standard and ∼21-mm thickness. The other, newer U-pile steel was AU25 (grade 350) manufactured by ArcelorMittal (Luxembourg) and is ∼14-mm thick. Samples of each steel type were obtained by cutting sections (ca. 100 by 150 cm) from the top of the sheet pile, using an angle grinder with a thin fiber disk to minimize heat generation (Fig. S1).

Subsections were cut from the steel sections using an abrasive water-jet machine (OMAX-1515 Maxiem). Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy was used to determine the chemical composition of the steels. Samples cut with the long axis in the same direction as the rolling plane (Fig. S1) were used for microstructural analysis. These samples were first manually ground using silicon carbide papers (grit size, 500 and 1,200) and then fine polished using sequence 5-, 3-, and 1-μm diamond-based suspensions. Optical microscope images (BX61; Olympus) were taken at a range of magnifications of various locations on the longitudinal plane and rolling plane surfaces to determine the presence of inclusions. Quantification of the inclusion content was determined using thresholding with ImageJ (42).

To observe the microstructure of the steels the polished metal coupons were etched using 2% Nital solution, a combination of 98 ml of absolute ethanol (100%) and 2 ml of nitric acid (70%). Microscopic images were then taken of various locations on the longitudinal plane and rolling plane surfaces at various magnifications. These images were then used to determine the grain size, using the intercept method according to the ASTM standard E112 (43), and the percentage of pearlite phase present in the steels, using the ASTM standard E562 (44). Visual inspections of the sheet piles indicated similar levels of general corrosion (above the water line) and similar numbers/morphologies and extents of orange tubercles on the two different steel types.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing of microbial communities.Genomic DNA was extracted from the eight collected samples (i.e., homogenized inner and outer layers of tubercles at the four locations; 1.8 ml each) and the seawater filter membrane using an UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (MoBio; Qiagen). An additional step of heat treatment (65°C for 15 min) following the bead-beating step was included in attempts to increase the DNA yield of environmental samples and DNA was quantified by using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). Extracted DNA was amplified by PCR using primers (indicated by italics within the sequences) 515F (5′-TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG TAT GGT AAT TGT GTG YCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′) and 806R (5′-GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GAG TCA GTC AGC C GGA CTA CNV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′) for the variable region 4 (V4) of 16S rRNA genes (45, 46), where the nucleotides without italics represent the metabarcoding adapters, pads, and linker nucleotides. Each reaction tube contained 10 to 25 ng of DNA, 12.5 μl of of MangoMix (Bioline), 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), and sterile MilliQ water up to 25 μl. DNA was amplified in a MyCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) with the following temperature profile: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 45 s), annealing (55°C for 45 s), extension (72°C for 45 s); and then a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Duplicate PCR products of the appropriate length (∼382 bp) of each template were pooled to a total volume of 25 μl and transported on dry ice to the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (University of New South Wales, Australia) for sequencing with an Illumina MiSeq sequencer.

Analysis of metabarcoding data.The QIIME version 1.9.1 environment was installed on Australia’s National eResearch Collaboration Tools and Resources cloud-based supercomputing platform. The 16S rRNA gene libraries were filtered using Trimmomatic 0.36 to eliminate low-quality sequence reads. PandaSeq 0.19.2 was the tool to join paired-ended reads and discard the joined sequences <250 nucleotides in length. USEARCH 6.1 was used for chimera detection and OTU picking. Default identity threshold of USEARCH 6.1 was 97%. The nonchimeric sequences per sample were counted and created the OTU table. The taxonomy assignment was clustered against the 16SMicrobial database from NCBI (downloaded on 29 March 2017 and processed by the NCBI 2.2.22 software package). The alpha diversity was determined for richness quality of the observed OTUs within each sample. In addition, the beta diversity was analyzed under the algorithm of Bray-Curtis and ANOSIM to present the OTU composition among groups of samples. In addition, the final OTU table and its metadata were submitted to METAGENassist (www.metagenassist.ca) for further visualization and functional analysis.

Isolation of bacteria.For aerobic cultivation, four media were chosen to culture different bacteria: (i) marine agar (MA; BD Difco); (ii) R2A-SS (R2A [Merck] prepared with Red Sea salt [RSS] at 36 ppt salinity); (iii) supplemented Trypticase soy agar (TSA+ [Merck] supplemented with ferrous ammonium sulfate solution 5% [(NH4)2Fe(SO4)2, Thermo Fisher], magnesium sulfate (MgSO4; Sigma), and sodium d,l-lactate 60% [CH3CH(OH)COONa, Sigma]; and (iv) supplemented marine agar [MA+; 5% marine agar supplemented with (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2 solution and 60% sodium d,l-lactate].

The R2A-SS medium was autoclaved (121°C for 16 min) separately in a 2× concentration of 15.2 g/liter of R2A (pH 7.2 ± 0.2) and 36 g/liter of RSS (pH 8.3 ± 0.2) to avoid salt precipitation and then mixed together prior to pouring into petri dishes. The MA medium (pH 7.6 ± 0.2) was prepared by sterilizing 37.4 g/liter of marine broth (BD, Difco) supplemented with 15 g/liter of bacterial agar (BD, Difco). The TSA+ medium was prepared by adding 30 g/liter of Trypticase soy broth (BD, Difco), 0.98 g/liter of MgSO4, 4 ml/liter of sodium d,l-lactate 60%, and 15 g/liter of agar (pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.05) and autoclaving. A 5% solution of (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2 was filter sterilized with a 0.22-μm-pore-size membrane and 20 ml was added to 1 liter of the cooled TSA plus magnesium plus lactate medium prior to pouring into petri dishes. The MA+ medium (with lactate and ferrous ammonium sulfate) was prepared by mixing MA and sodium d,l-lactate (pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.05), autoclaving, adding the (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2 solution to the cooled MA, and then pouring into petri dishes. All components were dissolved in distilled water.

For anaerobic cultivation, THA+ (thioglycolate agar [Merck], pH 7.1 ± 0.2, prepared with RSS as described for R2A) was used instead of R2A-SS in the aerobic isolation, since it contains components designed to reduce the redox potential of the medium, favoring anaerobes. Thus, the four media used for anaerobic cultivation were MA, TSA+, MA+, and THA+.

Serial dilutions of samples from the inner and outer layers of one orange tubercle under which pitting had occurred were prepared in sterile saline (0.9% NaCl). The mixtures were vortexed thoroughly for 1 min between dilutions. Volumes of 50 μl of four dilutions (undiluted and dilutions of 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3) were spread plate inoculated onto prepared media in triplicate. Anaerobic conditions were achieved by an anaerobic jar (BD) containing anaerobic sachets (AnaeroGen; Oxoid) and indicators (Resazurin, Oxoid). All plates and anaerobic jars were incubated at 25°C for 16 days (aerobes) and for 25 days (anaerobes). All different colony morphologies from the growth on the plates were counted and subcultured onto the corresponding media to get pure isolates. The pure cultures were grown and stored in 20% glycerol (Merck) at –80°C as stocks.

Identification of isolates.Isolated colonies of pure cultures were grown in liquid media with shaking at 150 rpm and on agar plates at 25°C for 48 h, which were then used for DNA extraction. Colony DNA was obtained by heat treatment of bacterial colonies in sterile MilliQ water at 95°C for 15 min. The mixture was rapidly cooled to ambient temperature and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min to remove cell debris. For isolates where no colony DNA was obtained, pure culture broths were used to extract gDNA by using the MoBio UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The size and quality of extracted DNA were checked by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel (Bioline), including GelRed (Biotium). DNA was quantified using the NanoDrop apparatus. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the primers 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1492R (5′-CGG YTA CCT TGT TAC GAC TT-3′) (47). Each reaction tube contained 100 to 400 ng of template DNA (determined using NanoDrop), 12.5 μl of MangoMix (Bioline), 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), and sterile MilliQ water up to 25 μl. The run cycle of MyCycler (Bio-Rad) for PCR was as follows: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 45 s), annealing (55°C for 45 s), and extension (72°C for 45 s); and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were sent to Macrogen Inc. (South Korea) in a 96 well-plate at ambient temperature for DNA purification and Sanger sequencing. Received sequence chromatograms were viewed in the software package BioEdit and manually checked for quality and length. Trimmed high-quality sequences were compared to those in GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) by the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn). Sequences with a ≥97% identity to the isolate sequences were deemed putative identifications of the isolates. 16S rRNA gene sequences of type strains of the isolate’s closest relatives were obtained from the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Phylogenetic trees were constructed in MEGA7.0.14 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software; www.megasoftware.net) using Clustal W for sequence alignment and the neighbor-joining clustering method with 2,000 bootstrap resamplings.

Data availability.The microbial sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI database. BioProject accession number PRJNA524055 has been issued for the metabarcoding data set (nine biosample accessions from SAMN10995695 to SAMN10995703). For the isolate sequences, the corresponding accession numbers are from MK568337 to MK568455, which are included in Fig. 7, next to the corresponding isolate codes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.C.P. acknowledges the support of Victorian Government (Australia) via a joint scholarship between the Victorian International Research Scholarship and Swinburne University of Technology.

We thank Sean Blackwood (Queenscliff Harbor) for assisting with field testing and providing samples of sheet piling steels used in this work.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 March 2020.
    • Accepted 21 April 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 24 April 2020.
  • Supplemental material is available online only.

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Little BJ,
    2. Lee JS
    . 2009. Microbiologically influenced corrosion. In Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Wiley Online Library, New York, NY. doi:10.1002/0471238961.micrlitt.a01.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Breakell JE,
    2. Siegwart M,
    3. Forster K,
    4. Marshall D,
    5. Hodgson M,
    6. Cottis R,
    7. Lyon S
    . 2005. Management of accelerated low water corrosion in steel maritime structures. CIRIA, London, United Kingdom.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Beech IB,
    2. Campbell SA
    . 2008. Accelerated low water corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of a biofilm harbouring sulphate-reducing and sulphur-oxidising bacteria recovered from a marine sediment. Electrochim Acta 54:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.084.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Philips J,
    2. Van den Driessche N,
    3. De Paepe K,
    4. Prévoteau A,
    5. Gralnick JA,
    6. Arends JB,
    7. Rabaey K
    . 2018. A novel Shewanella isolate enhances corrosion by using metallic iron as the electron donor with fumarate as the electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01154-18. doi:10.1128/AEM.01154-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Enning D,
    2. Garrelfs J
    . 2014. Corrosion of iron by sulfate-reducing bacteria: new views of an old problem. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1226–1236. doi:10.1128/AEM.02848-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jia R,
    2. Tan JL,
    3. Jin P,
    4. Blackwood DJ,
    5. Xu D,
    6. Gu T
    . 2018. Effects of biogenic H2S on the microbiologically influenced corrosion of C1018 carbon steel by sulfate reducing Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. Corros Sci 130:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2017.10.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Malard E,
    2. Gueuné H,
    3. Fagot A,
    4. Lemière A,
    5. Sjogren L,
    6. Tidblad J,
    7. Sanchez-Amaya JM,
    8. Muijzer G,
    9. Marty F,
    10. Quillet L,
    11. Paisse S
    . 2013. Microbiologically induced corrosion of steel structures in port environment: improving prediction and diagnosis of ALWC (MICSIPE). RFCS Publications, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Little B,
    2. Ray R,
    3. Pope R
    . 2000. Relationship between corrosion and the biological sulfur cycle: a review. Corrosion 56:433–443. doi:10.5006/1.3280548.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dang H,
    2. Lovell CR
    . 2016. Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:91–138. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00037-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Usher K,
    2. Kaksonen A,
    3. MacLeod I
    . 2014. Marine rust tubercles harbour iron corroding archaea and sulphate reducing bacteria. Corros Sci 83:189–197. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2014.02.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Païssé S,
    2. Ghiglione JF,
    3. Marty F,
    4. Abbas B,
    5. Gueuné H,
    6. Amaya JMS,
    7. Muyzer G,
    8. Quillet L
    . 2013. Sulfate-reducing bacteria inhabiting natural corrosion deposits from marine steel structures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:7493–7504. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4464-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Phan HC,
    2. Wade SA,
    3. Blackall LL
    . 2019. Is marine sediment the source of microbes associated with accelerated low water corrosion? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:449–459. doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9455-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lanneluc I,
    2. Langumier M,
    3. Sabot R,
    4. Jeannin M,
    5. Refait P,
    6. Sable S
    . 2015. On the bacterial communities associated with the corrosion product layer during the early stages of marine corrosion of carbon steel. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 99:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Melchers RE,
    2. Jeffrey RJ,
    3. Usher KM
    . 2014. Localized corrosion of steel sheet piling. Corros Sci 79:139–147. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2013.10.038.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    ArcelorMittal. 2011. AMLoCor steel grade significantly increases the design life of seaport structures. ArcelorMittal, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Melchers RE,
    2. Jeffrey R
    . 2012. Corrosion of long vertical steel strips in the marine tidal zone and implications for ALWC. Corros Sci 65:26–36. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2012.07.025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Melchers R
    . 2013. Influence of dissolved inorganic nitrogen on accelerated low water corrosion of marine steel piling. Corrosion 69:95–103. doi:10.5006/0728.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Clover D,
    2. Kinsella B,
    3. Pejcic B,
    4. De Marco R
    . 2005. The influence of microstructure on the corrosion rate of various carbon steels. J Appl Electrochem 35:139–149. doi:10.1007/s10800-004-6207-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Avci R,
    2. Davis B,
    3. Wolfenden M,
    4. Beech I,
    5. Lucas K,
    6. Paul D
    . 2013. Mechanism of MnS-mediated pit initiation and propagation in carbon steel in an anaerobic sulfidogenic media. Corros Sci 76:267–274. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2013.06.049.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Melchers RE,
    2. Jeffrey RJ
    . 2013. Accelerated low water corrosion of steel piling in harbours. Corros Eng Sci Techn 48:496–505. doi:10.1179/1743278213Y.0000000103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Duan J,
    3. Xiao H,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Guan F,
    7. Zhai X
    . 2017. Analysis of bacterial community composition of corroded steel immersed in Sanya and Xiamen seawaters in China via method of Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Front Microbiol 8:1737. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01737.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Celikkol-Aydin S,
    2. Gaylarde CC,
    3. Lee T,
    4. Melchers RE,
    5. Witt DL,
    6. Beech IB
    . 2016. 16S rRNA gene profiling of planktonic and biofilm microbial populations in the Gulf of Guinea using Illumina NGS. Mar Environ Res 122:105–112. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.10.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Ma Y,
    3. Duan J,
    4. Li X,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Hou B
    . 2019. Analysis of marine microbial communities colonizing various metallic materials and rust layers. Biofouling 35:429–442. doi:10.1080/08927014.2019.1610881.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ramírez GA,
    2. Hoffman CL,
    3. Lee MD,
    4. Lesniewski RA,
    5. Barco RA,
    6. Garber A,
    7. Toner BM,
    8. Wheat CG,
    9. Edwards KJ,
    10. Orcutt BN
    . 2016. Assessing marine microbial induced corrosion at Santa Catalina Island, California. Front Microbiol 7:1679.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Xiao H,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Tang X,
    6. Duan J,
    7. Yang Z,
    8. Wang J,
    9. Guan F,
    10. Ding G
    . 2019. Analysis of cultivable aerobic bacterial community composition and screening for facultative sulfate-reducing bacteria in marine corrosive steel. J Ocean Limnol 37:600–614. doi:10.1007/s00343-019-7400-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Gaylarde PM,
    2. Gaylarde CC
    . 1999. Algae and cyanobacteria on painted surfaces in Southern Brazil. Rev Microbiol 30:209–213. doi:10.1590/S0001-37141999000300005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Pei G,
    3. Chen L,
    4. Zhang W
    . 2016. Metabolic dynamics of Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm grown on a steel surface. Biofouling 32:725–736. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1193166.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Schink B
    . 2006. The genus Pelobacter, p 3393–3399. In Balows A, Truper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer H-H (ed), The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications, 2nd ed, vol IV. Springer, New York, NY.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Miyazaki M,
    2. Sakai S,
    3. Ritalahti KM,
    4. Saito Y,
    5. Yamanaka Y,
    6. Saito Y,
    7. Tame A,
    8. Uematsu K,
    9. Löffler FE,
    10. Takai K,
    11. Imachi H
    . 2014. Sphaerochaeta multiformis sp. nov., an anaerobic, psychrophilic bacterium isolated from subseafloor sediment, and emended description of the genus Sphaerochaeta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:4147–4154. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.068148-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Li XX,
    2. Liu JF,
    3. Zhou L,
    4. Mbadinga SM,
    5. Yang SZ,
    6. Gu JD,
    7. Mu BZ
    . 2017. Diversity and composition of sulfate-reducing microbial communities based on genomic DNA and RNA transcription in production water of high temperature and corrosive oil reservoir. Front Microbiol 8:1011. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jin J,
    2. Guan Y
    . 2014. The mutual coregulation of extracellular polymeric substances and iron ions in biocorrosion of cast iron pipes. Bioresour Technol 169:387–394. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.059.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Zuo R,
    2. Wood TK
    . 2004. Inhibiting mild steel corrosion from sulfate-reducing and iron-oxidizing bacteria using gramicidin-S-producing biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:747–753. doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1651-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Templeton AS,
    2. Staudigel H,
    3. Tebo BM
    . 2005. Diverse Mn(II)-oxidizing bacteria isolated from submarine basalts at Loihi Seamount. Geomicrobiol J 22:127–139. doi:10.1080/01490450590945951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kip N,
    2. Van Veen JA
    . 2015. The dual role of microbes in corrosion. ISME J 9:542–551. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Moura V,
    2. Ribeiro I,
    3. Moriggi P,
    4. Capão A,
    5. Salles C,
    6. Bitati S,
    7. Procópio L
    . 2018. The influence of surface microbial diversity and succession on microbiologically influenced corrosion of steel in a simulated marine environment. Arch Microbiol 200:1447–1456. doi:10.1007/s00203-018-1559-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Jones AA,
    2. Bennett PC
    . 2014. Mineral microniches control the diversity of subsurface microbial populations. Geomicrobiol J 31:246–261. doi:10.1080/01490451.2013.809174.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Balkwill D
    . 2005. Genus VI Ensifer, p 354–358. In Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Nguyen V,
    2. Park Y,
    3. Yu J,
    4. Lee T
    . 2016. Simultaneous arsenite oxidation and nitrate reduction at the electrodes of bioelectrochemical systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:19978–19988. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7225-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. O’Brien AM,
    2. Yu ZH,
    3. Luo D-Y,
    4. Laurich J,
    5. Passeport E,
    6. Frederickson M
    . 2019. Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/726653v1.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Iino T,
    2. Sakamoto M,
    3. Ohkuma M
    . 2015. Prolixibacter denitrificans sp. nov., an iron-corroding, facultatively aerobic, nitrate-reducing bacterium isolated from crude oil, and emended descriptions of the genus Prolixibacter and Prolixibacter bellariivorans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2865–2869. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.000343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Cavaleiro AJ,
    2. Abreu AA,
    3. Sousa DZ,
    4. Pereira MA,
    5. Alves MM
    . 2013. The role of marine anaerobic bacteria and archaea in bioenergy production, p 445–469. In Malik A, Grohmann E, Alves M (ed), Management of microbial resources in the environment. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Rasband W
    . 1997. ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  43. 43.↵
    ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM International, Conshohocken, PA.
  44. 44.↵
    ASTM. 2011. Standard test method for determining volume fraction by systematic manual point. ASTM International, Conshohocken, PA.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Parada AE,
    2. Needham DM,
    3. Fuhrman JA
    . 2016. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol 18:1403–1414. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Walters W,
    2. Hyde ER,
    3. Berg-Lyons D,
    4. Ackermann G,
    5. Humphrey G,
    6. Parada A,
    7. Gilbert JA,
    8. Jansson JK,
    9. Caporaso JG,
    10. Fuhrman JA,
    11. Apprill A,
    12. Knight R
    . 2016. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1:e00009-15. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00009-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Lane DJ
    . 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p 125–175. In Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Microbial Communities of Orange Tubercles in Accelerated Low-Water Corrosion
Hoang C. Phan, Scott A. Wade, Linda L. Blackall
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jun 2020, 86 (13) e00610-20; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00610-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Microbial Communities of Orange Tubercles in Accelerated Low-Water Corrosion
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Microbial Communities of Orange Tubercles in Accelerated Low-Water Corrosion
Hoang C. Phan, Scott A. Wade, Linda L. Blackall
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jun 2020, 86 (13) e00610-20; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00610-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

ALWC
MIC
metabarcoding
orange tubercle
pure culture

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336