Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Environmental Microbiology

A Novel Antidipteran Bacillus thuringiensis Strain: Unusual Cry Toxin Genes in a Highly Dynamic Plasmid Environment

Nancy Fayad, Zakaria Kambris, Laure El Chamy, Jacques Mahillon, Mireille Kallassy Awad
Karyn N. Johnson, Editor
Nancy Fayad
aLaboratory of Food and Environmental Microbiology, Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
bLaboratory of Biodiversity and Functional Genomics, UR-EGP, Faculty of Science, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beirut, Lebanon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nancy Fayad
Zakaria Kambris
cBiology Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laure El Chamy
bLaboratory of Biodiversity and Functional Genomics, UR-EGP, Faculty of Science, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beirut, Lebanon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacques Mahillon
aLaboratory of Food and Environmental Microbiology, Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mireille Kallassy Awad
bLaboratory of Biodiversity and Functional Genomics, UR-EGP, Faculty of Science, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beirut, Lebanon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mireille Kallassy Awad
Karyn N. Johnson
University of Queensland
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02294-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Bacillus thuringiensis has emerged as a major bioinsecticide on the global market. It offers a valuable alternative to chemical products classically utilized to control pest insects. Despite the efficiency of several strains and products available on the market, the scientific community is always on the lookout for novel toxins that can replace or supplement the existing products. In this study, H3, a novel B. thuringiensis strain showing mosquitocidal activity, was isolated from Lebanese soil and characterized in vivo at genomic and proteomic levels. H3 parasporal crystal is toxic on its own but displays an unusual killing profile with a higher 50% lethal concentration (LC50) than the reference B. thuringiensis serovar israelensis crystal proteins. In addition, H3 has a different toxicity order: it is more toxic to Aedes albopictus and Anopheles gambiae than to Culex pipiens. Whole-genome sequencing and crystal analysis revealed that H3 can produce 11 novel Cry proteins, 8 of which are assembled in genes with an orf1-gap-orf2 organization, where orf2 is a potential Cry4-type crystallization domain. Moreover, pH3-180, the toxin-carrying plasmid, holds a wide repertoire of mobile genetic elements that amount to ca. 22% of its size., including novel insertion sequences and class II transposable elements. Two other large plasmids present in H3 carry genetic determinants for the production of many interesting molecules—such as chitinase, cellulase, and bacitracin—that may add up to H3 bioactive properties. This paper therefore reports a novel mosquitocidal Bacillus thuringiensis strain with unusual Cry toxin genes in a rich mobile DNA environment.

IMPORTANCE Bacillus thuringiensis, a soil entomopathogenic bacterium, is at the base of many sustainable eco-friendly bioinsecticides. Hence stems the need to continually characterize insecticidal toxins. H3 is an antidipteran B. thuringiensis strain, isolated from Lebanese soil, whose parasporal crystal contains 11 novel Cry toxins and no Cyt toxins. In addition to its individual activity, H3 showed potential as a coformulant with classic commercialized B. thuringiensis products, to delay the emergence of resistance and to shorten the time required for killing. On a genomic level, H3 holds three large plasmids, one of which carries the toxin-coding genes, with four occurrences of the distinct orf1-gap-orf2 organization. Moreover, this plasmid is extremely rich in mobile genetic elements, unlike its two coresidents. This highlights the important underlying evolutionary traits between toxin-carrying plasmids and the adaptation of a B. thuringiensis strain to its environment and insect host spectrum.

INTRODUCTION

Bacillus cereus sensu lato, a diverse group of spore-forming Gram-positive bacteria, contains nine closely related species with a wide pathogenicity spectrum but whose exact phylogeny remains a matter of debate (1–3). Bacillus thuringiensis, a soil-dwelling bacterium, is one of the best-studied members of this group. In fact, B. thuringiensis strains are commercialized and used worldwide as biopesticides in an effort to replace harmful chemical insecticides in the fight against disease-carrying and phytopathogenic insects. Their entomopathogenic capacities are due to a parasporal crystal, formed during sporulation and consisting of δ-endotoxins (or Cry), sometimes associated with Cyt cytotoxins. This crystal is solubilized after ingestion by the alkaline environment of the target larva midgut (4).

Cry toxins, activated by proteases, bind to specific receptors localized in the apical microvilli of insect midgut cells. This is followed by an oligomerization of the toxins and their insertion into the apical membrane, leading to the formation of pores that cause intestinal cell lysis and consequently the death of the insect larvae (5). So far, the B. thuringiensis toxin database, set up by Crickmore et al. (6) (https://www.bpprc.org/ [7]) encompasses 73 families of three-domain (3D) Cry toxins. Whereas domain I presents an α-helical structure and is involved in toxin oligomerization and membrane insertion thus pore formation, domains II and III have β-prism and β-sheet structures, respectively, and have been found to mediate recognition and interaction with insect gut protein receptors (5, 8, 9). A key feature of all Cry toxins is their receptor specificity. The combination of Cry toxins produced by a particular strain determines its host spectrum (10). In contrast, Cyt toxins are cytolytic endotoxins that act via nonspecific detergent-like (11) or pore-forming (12) models. Remarkably, Cyt toxins may show significant homology with proteins produced by distant microorganisms, such as volvatoxin A2, a heat-labile cardiotoxin produced by the straw mushroom Volvariella volvacea (13), as well as other proteins found in pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., Clostridium kluyveri or Streptomyces venezuelae) (14).

The combination of various toxins in the same crystal leads to synergistic interactions among Cry toxins or between Cry and Cyt toxins when both are present. The synergy can increase toxicity and play against the emergence of resistant insect populations (15). This has been observed, for instance, for the combination of Cry2A and Cry4B (16) and for that of Cry21Fa1 and Cry21Ha1 (17). Similar observations have been made in the case of B. thuringiensis serovar (sv.) israelensis, in which Cyt1A helps Cry4 toxins to overcome resistance of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae (18). Cyt1A was also found to act as a receptor and anchor for Cry11Aa to increase its toxicity to Aedes aegypti larvae (19), and Cyt1A and Cyt2A were shown to synergize Cry4B toxins, at a ratio as low as 1% in the mix (20, 21).

B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis is an example of a highly effective combination of toxins. It is the reference for antidipteran activity, to which no resistance has been observed in the field despite its long usage as a biocontrol agent due to the mix of Cry toxins as well as the presence of the Cyt toxins (22). Its crystal is composed of Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry10Aa, Cry11Aa, Cyt1Aa, and Cyt2Ba, with Cyt being the major component. These toxin-encoding genes are located on the 128-kb toxin-carrying plasmid pBtoxis (23).

Plasmids are part of the repertoire of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) of each strain. Some of these extrachromosomal entities can be conjugative (24), mobilizable, or of prophage-like nature (25). Another group of MGEs are transposable elements (TEs), which can move from one location to another within the same genome. They include insertion sequences (IS), with a simple organization of two inverted repeats flanking a transposase-coding gene (26), or more complex elements, such as class II TEs (27). TEs also include composite transposons, with two IS flanking one or more passenger genes (28). In addition, MGEs comprise group II introns, which have a complex secondary RNA structure (29), and Bacillus cereus repeats small DNA fragments found only in the B. cereus group (30). In this group, the occurrence and distribution of MGE types and families vary greatly among its members, as has recently been shown (31).

Plasmids, more specifically those carrying toxin genetic determinants, are key elements of the ecology and adaptation of B. cereus sensu lato species, especially in the case of B. thuringiensis, whose plasmid percentage of the genome is 2.66 times higher than that of its closest relative, B. cereus sensu stricto (31). Toxin-carrying plasmids form up to 30% of the B. thuringiensis plasmid pool, and toxin-coding genes are often associated with transposable elements (TEs), such as IS or class II transposable elements (32–34).

B. thuringiensis is the basis of many efficient biopesticidal products available on the market (e.g., Vectobac and Monterey B.t.). Nevertheless, the scientific community is always on the lookout for new active B. thuringiensis strains producing novel Cry toxins.

In this study, we characterized a new antidipteran B. thuringiensis strain, isolated from Lebanese soil, whose spore-crystal mixture lacks Cyt toxins and displays a novel in vivo killing profile. We have also found that this H3 strain harbors a plethora of mobile genetic elements, often associated with the entomotoxin genetic determinants.

RESULTS

Bacterial strains and bioassays.B. thuringiensis strain H3 was isolated from a soil sample from the region of Harissa (Lebanon). This strain produces a round parasporal crystal. In an effort to find new antidipteran B. thuringiensis strains, the H3 crystal-spore mixture was tested against third-instar larvae of Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens, and Anopheles gambiae. Initial survival tests were performed using five crystal proteins concentrations (5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 μg/ml). H3 was noticeably less toxic to Culex than to Anopheles and Aedes (Table 1 and Fig. 1), with 50% lethal concentration (LC50) values after 24 h of 221 ± 98, 15.8 ± 3.43, and 7.6 ± 0.88 µg/ml, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, for a δ-endotoxin concentration of 40 µg/ml, the survival rate was ca. 80% for C. pipiens larvae after 24 h, compared to 24% and 10% for A. gambiae and A. albopictus, respectively. As for the reference strain B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis AM65-52, the LC50 values, calculated 2 h 30 min postinfection for Culex, 3 h 30 min postinfection for Anopheles, and 5 h postinfection for Aedes, were 7.4 ± 0.11, 33.36 ± 0.5, and 8.39 ± 0.09 ng/ml, respectively (35).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Larvicidal activities of B. thuringiensis strains AM65-52 and H3 on third-instar larvae of A. albopictus, A. gambiae, and C. pipiens

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Toxicity analysis of the spore-crystal mixture of B. thuringiensis strain H3 on third-instar larvae of A. albopictus, A. gambiae, and C. pipiens. Graphs show the percentage of survivors through time for a crystal-spore mixture concentration of 40 µg/ml.

While AM65-52 showed the highest activity against Culex, this was not the case for H3, which was most toxic to Aedes larvae, on which additional bioassays were conducted. Third-instar A. albopictus larvae were exposed to various combinations of H3 and AM65-52 spore-crystal mixtures at a final concentration of 40 µg/ml of toxin. Subsequently, the 50% lethal time (LT50) of the combination and that AM65-52 spore-crystal mixture alone were compared. The combination of H3 and AM65-52 resulted in a reduction of the AM65-52 LT50 via a potential additive effect for all tested combinations with varied proportions of the spore-crystal mixtures (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). For instance, in a comparison of the 90:10 ratio of H3 to AM65-52 to AM65-52 alone at a 10% ratio of the total 40-µg/ml concentration (i.e., at 4 µg/ml), the observed LT50 was ca. 60 instead of 80 min.

The Cry toxin composition of strain H3 was then assessed for its protein profile, which was compared to that of AM65-52. The two strains did not share any protein bands, reflecting their different crystal compositions (Fig. 2). Moreover, PCR screening of genes encoding known antidipteran Cry proteins (Cry4A/B, Cry10, and Cry11) was negative with only a partial segment of the 5′ end of the cry4B gene amplified with Dip2A-Dip2B primers (36). Taken together, these results strongly suggested that strain H3 produces new antidipteran toxins. PCR with genes encoding Cyt toxins (Cyt1A and Cyt2B) was also negative, meaning that H3, contrary to classic antidipteran strains, does not produce those Cyt toxins. Moreover, washed, solubilized, and filtered crystals of H3 and AM65-52 were tested on 5% sheep blood agar. While AM65-52 crystals showed a clear halo where the blood cells were lysed, H3 crystals did not (Fig. S2).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Washed crystal protein profile on 12% SDS-PAGE of H3 and the reference B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis strain AM65-52. MW, molecular weight markers; sizes are indicated on the left.

Whole-genome sequencing of strain H3.In order to characterize the potentially new Cry toxins produced by strain H3, a whole-genome sequencing (WGS) approach was performed using PacBio, with Illumina MiSeq polishing. The assembled genome of B. thuringiensis H3 consists of four replicons: a chromosome of 5,487,336 bp and three large plasmids: pH3-552 (552,228 bp), pH3-180 (180,731 bp), and pH3-101 (101,260 bp). Sequences of the 6,321,555-bp genome were deposited in NCBI genome database under the BioProject identifier (ID) PRJNA611745 and GenBank accession numbers CP052061 to CP052064. Sequence information for each replicon is shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Genomic features of B. thuringiensis strain H3

The H3 chromosome was aligned with the chromosomes of 12 B. thuringiensis strains and one Bacillus cytotoxicus strain using progressiveMauve (37). Following this alignment, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were extracted and compared between strains. On the basis of SNP divergence between the strains, a maximum-likelihood relationship dendrogram was constructed. This analysis showed that H3 is closely related to B. thuringiensis sv. sichuansis strain MC28 (GenBank accession no. CP003687.1 [38]) as shown by the relationship analysis (Fig. 3). Both strains showed antidipteran activity. As for H3 plasmids, they amount to ca. 12% of the H3 genome.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

SNP-based relationship dendrogram of several B. thuringiensis strains, with B. cytotoxicus NVH391-98 as an outgroup. Chromosomic DNA alignment and SNP extraction were done using progressiveMauve (37). The dendrogram was drawn using MEGA-X v10.0.5 (76).

Novel insecticidal toxins.Eleven putative insecticidal cry genes were identified on pH3-180 (Fig. 4) by Prokka and BtToxin_scanner annotations. Encoded proteins were compared by BLAST.P (39) to the NCBI nonredundant protein database and checked for the δ-endotoxin conserved domains by CDART (40). No cyt genes were found in the entire H3 genome. As shown in Table 3, seven H3 Cry proteins contain at least two conserved key insecticidal domains, one or two N-terminal endotoxin domains, and the C-terminal carbohydrate binding modules. Parts of the endotoxin domains are cleaved and eliminated during toxin activation to subsequently allow membrane insertion and pore formation. As for the carbohydrate binding module, it is implicated in toxin-receptor interactions (41).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Circular map of B. thuringiensis strain H3 toxin-carrying plasmid pH3-180. The block arrows in the outer circles indicate the predicted open reading frames (ORFs) in their direction of transcription, with or without functional annotation or relevant homologues. The black circle represents the GC content plotted using a sliding window, as the deviation from the average GC content of the entire sequence. The green/magenta circles represent the GC skew calculated, using a sliding window, as (G−C)/(G+C) and plotted as the deviation from the average GC skew of the entire sequence. ORFs encoding Cry toxins, transposable elements with their associated ORFs, and sporulation-related proteins are highlighted by blue, dark pink, and fuchsia block arrows, respectively. The composite transposons containing cry genes are indicated by gold arcs on the outermost circle.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3

Insecticidal Cry proteins produced by B. thuringiensis strain H3a

Four other genes (all designated ORF2) were also annotated as potentially associated with an insecticidal function. The proteins they encode contain a newly recognized crystallization domain following CDART analysis (40) and present a high sequence similarity to each other and to the C-terminal part of Cry4-type proteins. In comparison to Cry4Ba5 from B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis plasmid pBtoxis, the conserved area is located from amino acid position 656 to the end of the protein (Fig. S3). This high sequence similarity strongly suggests a conserved function with the crystallization domain of Cry4-type proteins, which is essential for their inclusion in the parasporal crystal (42). Interestingly, the genes encoding these proteins are located downstream of those encompassing conserved domains, with a short intergenic distance (max. 68 nt), as indicated in Table 3. Moreover, the nucleotide sequences of these gaps are almost identical, especially just before the start codon of orf2, where the consensus sequence is T-aaAAAGGTtGTGAaTcaT (upper- and lowercase letters indicate a more- or less-conserved nucleotide in the gap sequence). This sequence is also found in full-length cry4-type genes, upstream of the conserved C-terminal coding part. This is in line with a previous study that suggested a common origin for these orf2 coding genes: a truncated C-terminal part of a cry4-type gene that resulted from a rearrangement leading to an orf1-gap-orf2 organization (43).

In order to confirm that H3 actually expresses these cry genes, a detailed characterization of the protein content of the whole crystal was conducted using nano-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (nano-LC MS/MS) (44). The resulting peptides were used to identify the various proteins by homology search in the UniProt B. thuringiensis database. These peptides were cross-checked with the 11 Cry proteins predicted by WGS. The results confirmed the presence of the 11 potential proteins in H3 crystal: 7 with the conserved insecticidal domains, ranging in size between 78.19 and 91.24 kDa, and 4 with a newly identified crystallization domain, ranging between 55 and 65 kDa (Fig. 2 and Table S3).

Each of the seven newly identified Cry proteins with conserved insecticidal domains was compared to entries from the B. thuringiensis nomenclature database (7), following which a name was designated (Table 3). Proteins showing less than 45% sequence similarities with annotated Cry proteins from the B. thuringiensis nomenclature database, hence not passing the rank 1 threshold, were assigned as three-domain Cry toxins (3D Cry H3-1 and H3-2). Four other proteins showing sequence identity between 45 and 78% to annotated Cry toxins were consequently labeled Cry50-, Cry54-, Cry68-, and Cry71-like proteins. The last of the seven proteins, passing the rank2 threshold of 78% sequence identity with Cry70B, was named Cry70B-like protein.

pH3-180, the unusual mosquitocidal plasmid.pH3-180 is the only toxin-carrying plasmid of B. thuringiensis H3. In addition to cry genes, pH3-180 holds 35 elements belonging to 10 IS and class II transposable element families (Table S1) and one group II intron (Fig. 4). Interestingly, ca. 22% of pH3-180 is occupied by IS and Tn3-like elements. Some IS elements, such as the IS240A-like element from the IS6 family, are also found on B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis 128-kb toxin plasmid pBtoxis (45), while others, like ISBth166 from the IS110 family, are absent from pBtoxis.

The most abundant element on pH3-180 is the ISBth20-like element (IS6 family), present in 12 copies. The abundance of this element and its distribution on pH3-180 increase the possibility of forming composite transposons, with two ISBth20-like elements flanking one or more passenger genes. Even though composite transposons are not limited by size, those with the closest bordering ISBth20-like elements and a size under 10 kb are shown in Table S2. However, the two most noteworthy are those where ISBth20-like elements flank toxin-coding genes, as highlighted in Fig. 4 by golden arcs on the outermost circle. Such is the case for the first transposon, with cry70B-like, the B.th.I3-like group II intron, and a Tn4430-like transposase-coding gene, flanked by two iso-ISBth20 elements in opposite orientations. The second composite transposon includes two iso-ISBth20 elements in the same orientation flanking the cry54-like gene and its downstream orf2, as well as a phospholipase C-coding gene.pH3-180 also holds a transposase-coding gene from a potentially new family, identified as a PD-(D/E)XK nuclease family transposase. This superfamily encompasses proteins with diverse functional niches, such as DNA restriction, tRNA splicing, and DNA transposition (46). Although this protein superfamily remains somewhat unexplored in the transposition research field, PD-(D/E)XK putative transposase has been located in a number of microorganisms, including archaeal and bacterial strains (47).

Two new class II transposable elements were identified on pH3-180 and were designated TnBth5 and TnBth6. The former has a characteristic Tn3 family organization with 49- and 50-bp terminal inverted repeats flanking transposase- and resolvase-coding genes in opposite orientations (Fig. S4A). Interestingly, a second and identical copy of TnBth5 is present on the 100-kb plasmid pH3-101. As for TnBth6, it holds three coding DNA sequences (CDSs) in the same orientation, one of which is a resolvase and the other two seem to belong to a disrupted class II transposase (Fig. S4B). These CDSs are flanked by 48- and 50-bp-long inverted repeats.

Other TEs include the aforementioned B.th.I3-like group II intron, originally found in B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis strain ATCC 35646 within a gene coding a reverse transcriptase (48). In the case of strain H3, this element is missing ca. 500 bp at the 3′ end in comparison with B.th.I3 and carries a 335-amino-acid group II intron reverse transcriptase/maturase. The B.th.I3-like intron is located between an insecticidal toxin-coding gene and an ISBth20-like element, as mentioned above, without disrupting any CDS. In addition to these MGEs, seven tyrosine recombinase/integrase-coding genes are distributed on pH3-180. They may function independently or in association with other pH3-180 mobile elements.

Other interesting features.In addition to toxin genes and mobile elements, pH3-180 carries two operons containing three and two spore germination protein-encoding genes (Fig. 4). Moreover, pH3-180 holds two copies of a gene encoding the sporulation initiation inhibitor protein Soj (49) and one abrB gene, whose function is to control the transition from vegetative state to sporulation (50). Interestingly, a similar situation is observed for pH3-552, the large coresident plasmid, which harbors several genetic loci related to spore formation or germination.

Beside the Cry toxins, several noteworthy features are associated with strain H3 and could intervene in its interaction with surrounding environment. Many of these features are carried by the 552-kb megaplasmid pH3-552. These include several putative two-component systems and six ABC transporter systems. Concerning antibiotics, pH3-552 holds potential genetic determinants for fosfomycin resistance and bacitracin and gramicidin S synthesis. Strain H3 also carries genes encoding hydrolytic enzymes, also referred to as cell wall-degrading enzymes: cellulase, on pH3-552, and chitinase, on pH3-552 and the chromosome. Two other types of bioactive molecules, siderophores and lassopeptides, potentially produced by strain H3 are encoded on the chromosome.

DISCUSSION

Diptera, especially mosquitoes, serve as vectors for the transmission of many animal diseases, such as malaria, dengue, or yellow fever. So far, the commonly used method to fight these vector-borne diseases is to kill the mosquitoes with synthetic chemical insecticides. However, biopesticides, more particularly those based on B. thuringiensis, are slowly but surely taking over the insecticide market. Nonetheless, the need for prevention of potential emergence of resistant strains due to the prolonged use of the same combination of toxins in the field has motivated the search and characterization of novel insecticidal strains and toxins. In this study, a new B. thuringiensis strain, H3, isolated from Lebanese soil and active against dipteran larvae was characterized for both its insecticidal potential and genomic composition.

Strain H3 is toxic for third-instar larvae of A. albopictus, C. pipiens, and A. gambiae but at a higher dose than the reference B. thuringiensis israelensis serovar. However, H3 crystal lacks Cyt toxins, which could explain the observed higher dose required for its toxicity. Interesting results were also obtained with the combinations of H3 and AM65-52 spore-crystal mixture, following which the LT50 of AM65-52 was reduced. This raised a question regarding the nature of the interaction between the crystal toxins of AM65-52 and H3, which can be either an additive effect or a synergistic interaction. If indeed the observed effect stems from synergy between the toxins of the two strains, a second question ensues, which evokes the identity of the main actors in this interaction from the two strains’ crystal proteins. B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis Cyt toxins are a major component of the crystal and have a key role in its toxicity through their individual and synergistic activities with Cry toxins (19–21). In fact, thanks to their capacity to recognize and interact with the phospholipids of the insect midgut cells, Cyt toxins can act as receptors for Cry toxins in case of a shift or to simply increase the number of receptor-toxin interactions. This is why Cyt toxins, particularly Cyt1A, are well-known key players in the described synergism in many cases with several B. thuringiensis Cry toxins (51–53). Nonetheless, the possibility of synergistic interactions between the Cry toxins of the two strains cannot be excluded. Hence, three aspects need to be further explored in future experiments, which will consist of detailed synergistic tests between (i) Cyt1Aa and H3 crystal proteins, (ii) Cyt1Aa and individually cloned H3 crystal proteins, and (iii) paired combinations of individually cloned H3 and AM65-52 crystal proteins (i.e., Cry4Aa with Cry70B-like protein and Cry10Aa with Cry68-like protein).

Moreover, B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis is known to be more toxic to Culex than to Aedes and Anopheles larvae (35), in contrast to H3. Since the dose- and time-dependent killing profiles are indications of activity via specific receptors in the insect midgut, this led us to believe that H3 toxins kill the larvae in a different way than what was described for B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis. In agreement with the observed difference in toxicities between H3 and the reference B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis AM652-52, the crystal protein profile of the former is also completely different from that of the latter. In order to get more insight into the genetics and genomics of H3 entomotoxins, a whole-genome sequencing approach was used. The strain H3 chromosome appeared to be closely related to the chromosome of B. thuringiensis sv. sichuansis MC28, which also displays antidipteran activity (54). Moreover, H3 holds three new large plasmids, accounting for almost 12% of its genome, hence, in size, a higher-than-average plasmid percentage (11.2%) but a lower plasmid number per strain of B. thuringiensis (6.4 plasmids per stain [31]).pH3-180, the toxin-carrying plasmid, harbors 11 putative cry genes coding for potential parasporal crystal toxins. Seven of these proteins hold conserved insecticidal domains, of which five were placed in specific three-domain Cry toxins families displaying mosquitocidal activity (55) (Cry50, Cry54, Cry68, Cry70, and Cry71). The remaining two proteins (3D Cry H3-1 and H3-2) did not show enough protein sequence identity with any known Cry family but contained conserved insecticidal domains found in three-domain Cry toxins (Table 3). Even though these seven proteins have the necessary domains for insecticidal activity, it is unclear which one(s) is responsible for H3 antidipteran activity, since these toxins are new and not characterized yet. Therefore, a more in-depth investigation is needed for the assessment of the individual toxicity of each protein and the identification of its target receptors in the insect midgut.

As for the remaining four, they are designated ORF2 proteins, thought to be indispensable for correct expression, folding, and crystallization of the Cry toxin to which they are associated, as shown by previous studies. Barboza-Corona et al. have indeed shown that in the case of the cry19A operon, ORF2 enhances the synthesis and crystallization of Cry19A by functioning as a C-terminal crystallization domain (56). This was also demonstrated later on for Cry30 (57), Cry5B (58), and Cry65A (59). Another important orf1-gap-orf2 operon organization is that of B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis Cry10Aa protein, which requires ORF2 for correct crystallization, in contrast to Cry11Aa, which benefits from the presence of the 20-kDa helper protein p20 (43, 60). A 2015 study by Peng et al. suggested that this could be a new evolutionary strategy for B. thuringiensis Cry proteins and could explain why some Cry proteins cannot form crystals when expressed alone in an acrystalliferous strain (59). Interestingly, though, in the case of H3, four toxin genes adopt the orf1-gap-orf2 organization.

pH3-180 is also quite unusual for the abundance of TEs, including more than 35 IS and class II elements, a group II intron, and several potential composite transposons. For comparison, the large coresident pH3-552 plasmid (552 kb) holds only eight IS elements, belonging to three families (IS3, IS200/IS605, and IS4). Toxin-carrying plasmids in B. thuringiensis are no strangers to TEs, since they hold a good proportion of the total plasmidial IS, Tn3-like elements, and group II introns (31). As previously mentioned, several TEs were found to be associated with toxin-coding genes (e.g., IS231 [61]) and, when active, to shuffle the cry genes within the bacterial genome and also among strains in the case of conjugation/mobilization events. Of notice, however, is the 22% of pH3-180 occupied by TEs, a figure much higher than the average of 7.46% for toxin-carrying plasmids (31) and the 3.8% for the B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis pBtoxis plasmid (45). This is also much higher than the IS/Tn3-like element proportions of pH3-101 (5.9%) and pH3-552 (1.9%).

TE prevalence in toxin-carrying plasmids compared to other plasmids may underline an evolutionary adaptation mechanism, due to their contribution to the diversity of B. thuringiensis virulence and its insect host spectrum. Not only are toxin-carrying plasmids important for the ecological function of B. thuringiensis, but also they play key roles in other cellular functions, such as sporulation/germination. Some studies have suggested that these plasmids are the defining genomic entity for the recognition of a strain as a member of the B. thuringiensis species (62), although in some rare cases, cry genes were found on the chromosome, surrounded by IS elements, a possible reason for their mobility from plasmid to chromosome (63).

Another aspect of H3 toxicity brought to light by the whole-genome sequencing is a group of bioactive molecules possibly produced by H3. Many of these molecules are encoded by pH3-552. They include bacitracin (64) and gramicidin S (65), cyclic nonribosomal peptides mostly active against Gram-positive bacteria. In addition, H3, like other B. thuringiensis strains, potentially produces chitinase, an enzyme with great potential as an agent for biocontrol of pathogenic fungi (66) and as an added value to the insecticidal activity thanks to the degradation of chitin laminating the intestinal peritrophic membrane (67). Copies of the chitinase gene are found on the H3 chromosome as well as pH3-552.

The H3 chromosome also carries clusters for two other potential bioactive molecules: siderophores, iron-scavenging molecules that may act as biocontrol agents by chelating iron and reducing its bioavailability (64), and lassopeptides, ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs) with a unique 3-dimensional structure and a wide spectrum of antimicrobial and analgesic activities (68).

In conclusion, H3 is an interesting B. thuringiensis strain with a new plasmidial content, including a wide MGE repertoire within pH3-180, the toxin-carrying plasmid. The novelty of H3 Cry proteins, with their different killing profile, is encouraging for their potential use in the field as coformulants to the classic antidipteran strains. Nevertheless, these findings also raise several issues that pave the way for future studies, such as the individual toxicity of each of these new toxins and the identification of the receptors to which they bind, the role of ORF2 in the expression and correct folding of its associated protein, and, finally, the potential activity and effect of TEs within the toxin-carrying plasmid pH3-180.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis AM65-52, isolated from the commercial sample (Vectobac; Sumi- tomo), was our reference strain. It was kindly provided by Christina Nielsen-Leroux from the GME laboratory of the National Institute for Agronomical Research (INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France). Strain H3 was isolated from Lebanese soil and selected from a group of strains tested against third-instar mosquito larvae of Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens, and Anopheles gambiae and screened by PCR for genes encoding known antidipteran Cry (Cry4A/B, Cry10, and Cry11) and Cyt toxins. Microorganisms and primers used in this study are shown in Tables 4 and 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 4

Bacterial and mosquito strains used in this study

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 5

List of primers used in this study

Crystal protein extraction and SDS-PAGE analysis.B. thuringiensis strains were grown on solid T3 medium (69) for 72 h at 30°C. Spores and crystals were collected and washed twice with 1 M sodium chloride solution and six times with cold sterile water. The spore-crystal mixtures were then solubilized in 50 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH) buffer at 30°C (70). This was followed by centrifugation to eliminate remaining cellular debris and spores. Solubilized crystal proteins were then quantified using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad protein assay, catalog no. 500-0006 [71]). The proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue for profiling.

Bioassays.Bioassays were conducted on third-instar larvae of A. albopictus, C. pipiens, and A. gambiae, reared in the biology department of the American University of Beirut at 27°C and with 80% relative humidity and a 12-h:12-h dark:light period. A. gambiae larvae were kindly provided by Mike Osta. Bioassays were performed in three biological replicates, each time with experimental triplicates on 14 larvae in 15 ml of dechlorinated water. For B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis strain AM65-52, concentrations of crystal proteins within the crystal-spore mixture were aligned with known B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis crystal protein concentrations. As for H3, its spore-crystal mixture was tested at a range of crystal protein concentrations (5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 μg/ml) and then set at 40 µg/ml for comparison of H3 activities on the different insect larvae. Treated larvae were housed at 27°C and examined after 2, 4, 6, 24, and 26 h. Additional bioassays were conducted on third-instar A. albopictus larvae by combining spore-crystal mixtures of H3 and the reference strain B. thuringiensis sv. israelensis AM65-52 with five H3/AM65-52 ratios (95:5, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, and 50:50), while maintaining a total concentration of 40 µg/ml. The combination of H3 and AM65-52 crystal-spore mixtures was compared to that of H3 and AM65-52 alone, by evaluating the 50% lethal time (LT50) of the larvae.

Survival was determined by counting dead larvae over 160 min with 20-min intervals.

Plasmid DNA profiling.Large plasmids, hard to visualize using standard techniques, were extracted following the procedure originally described by Andrup et al. (72) and recently adapted by Gillis et al. (25). Plasmids were visualized on 0.5% SeaKem GTG agarose gel after 24 h of migration at 4°C and 80 V.

Whole-genome sequencing.Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit from Promega. Sequencing was done by PacBio on library DNA with a 7-kb size cutoff. Resulting sequences were polished by alignment with Illumina MiSeq data using bbmap (73). The final sequence was circularized by PCR, annotated by Prokka (74), and checked for completeness by BUSCO (75).

Phylogenetic relationships between H3 and 12 B. thuringiensis strains were assessed following alignment of chromosomes and extraction of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with progressiveMauve (37). The divergent B. cytotoxicus strain NVH391-98 was included as an outgroup. A maximum likelihood relationship dendrogram was then built using MEGA-X version 10.0.5 (76), with 500 bootstrap replicates.

Insecticidal Cry-, Cyt-, and Vip-coding genes were annotated by both Prokka and the online pipeline BtToxin_scanner (77). The two annotations were cross-checked and protein sequences verified manually by BLAST.P and by the NCBI Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool (CDART [40]). Corresponding proteins were compared to the B. thuringiensis nomenclature database (https://www.bpprc.org/ [7]) and assigned a rank according to the following thresholds based on protein sequence identity (ID): rank 1 (i.e., Cry2), ID of >45%; rank 2 (i.e., Cry2A), ID of >78%; rank 3 (i.e., Cry2Ab), ID of >95%, and rank 4 (i.e., Cry2Ab1), ID between 95 and 100% (8). Potential bioactive compounds clusters were predicted with the online tool antiSmash v5.0 (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/#/start [78]). Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) were annotated as detailed by Fayad et al. (31).

Whole-crystal protein identification.In order to identify the proteins composing the H3 crystal, H3 spores and crystals were first separated using a hexane-based method as described by Rahbani Mounsef et al. (79). Hexane treatment was repeated until a 1:10 spore/crystal ratio was obtained. The purified crystal pellet was then solubilized with 50 µl of NaOH 50 mM at 30°C for 2 h and loaded on a stacking SDS-PAGE gel. After a brief migration and Coomassie brilliant blue staining, the protein band containing the entire H3 crystal was cut and analyzed by nano-LC-MS/MS (44) in the proteomic platform IGBMC in Strasbourg, France. Identified peptides were then cross-referenced with the UniProt B. thuringiensis database (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=taxonomy:1428).

Data availability.Genome sequences were deposited in the NCBI database under BioProject ID PRJNA611745 and GenBank accession numbers CP052061 to CP052064.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Benoit Queffelec for his assistance in the statistical analysis of the bioassays and Mike Osta for providing Anopheles larvae.

This study was supported by the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS; Belgium) through grants to J. Mahillon, the Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) through a grant to N. Fayad, the National Council for Scientific Research in Lebanon (CNRS-L) and the research council of Saint-Joseph University of Beirut (CR-XFS104, CR-FS59) through grants to N. Fayad, and the PCSI (2017/2018) of the AUF-BMO for researcher mobility. Zakaria Kambris acknowledges AUB-URB support.

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 September 2020.
    • Accepted 25 November 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 11 December 2020.
  • Supplemental material is available online only.

  • Copyright © 2021 Fayad et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tourasse NJ,
    2. Helgason E,
    3. Økstad OA,
    4. Hegna IK,
    5. Kolstø AB
    . 2006. The Bacillus cereus group: novel aspects of population structure and genome dynamics. J Appl Microbiol 101:579–593. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03087.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bazinet AL
    . 2017. Pan-genome and phylogeny of Bacillus cereus sensu lato. BMC Evol Biol 17:1–16. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1020-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Okinaka RT,
    2. Keim P
    . 2016. The phylogeny of Bacillus cereus sensu lato. Microbiol Spectr 4:TBS-0012-2012. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0012-2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Schnepf E,
    2. Crickmore N,
    3. Rie JVAN,
    4. Lereclus D,
    5. Baum J,
    6. Feitelson J,
    7. Zeigler DR,
    8. Dean DH
    . 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806. doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.3.775-806.1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pardo-López L,
    2. Soberón M,
    3. Bravo A
    . 2013. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:3–22. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00341.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Crickmore N,
    2. Zeigler DR,
    3. Feitelson J,
    4. Schnepf E,
    5. Van Rie J,
    6. Lereclus D,
    7. Baum J,
    8. Dean DH
    . 1998. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:807–813. doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.3.807-813.1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Crickmore N,
    2. Berry C,
    3. Panneerselvam S,
    4. Mishra R,
    5. Connor TR,
    6. Bonning BC
    . 2020. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol 2020:107438. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2020.107438.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Palma L,
    2. Muñoz D,
    3. Berry C,
    4. Murillo J,
    5. Caballero P
    . 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: an overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins (Basel) 6:3296–3325. doi:10.3390/toxins6123296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Soberón M,
    2. Monnerat R,
    3. Bravo A
    . 2018. Mode of action of Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis and resistance mechanisms, p 15–27. In Gopalakrishnakone P, Stiles B, Alape-Girón A, Dubreuil J, Mandal M (ed), Microbial toxins—toxinology. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  10. 10.↵
    1. De Maagd RA,
    2. Bravo A,
    3. Crickmore N
    . 2001. How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world. Trends Genet 17:193–199. doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02237-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Manceva SD,
    2. Pusztai-Carey M,
    3. Russo PS,
    4. Butko P
    . 2005. A detergent-like mechanism of action of the cytolytic toxin Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Biochemistry 44:589–597. doi:10.1021/bi048493y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Promdonkoy B,
    2. Ellar DJ
    . 2003. Investigation of the pore-forming mechanism of a cytolytic δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem J 374:255–259. doi:10.1042/BJ20030437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lin SC,
    2. Lo YC,
    3. Lin JY,
    4. Liaw YC
    . 2004. Crystal structures and electron micrographs of fungal volvatoxin A2. J Mol Biol 343:477–491. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Soberón M,
    2. López-Díaz JA,
    3. Bravo A
    . 2013. Cyt toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis: a protein fold conserved in several pathogenic microorganisms. Peptides 41:87–93. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2012.05.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wirth MC,
    2. Park H,
    3. Walton WE,
    4. Federici BA
    . 2005. Cyt1A of Bacillus thuringiensis delays evolution of resistance to Cry11A in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:185–189. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.1.185-189.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zghal RZ,
    2. Tounsi S,
    3. Jaoua S
    . 2006. Characterization of a cry4Ba-type gene of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and evidence of the synergistic larvicidal activity of its encoded protein with Cry2A delta-endotoxin of B. thuringiensis kurstaki on Culex pipiens (common house mosquito). Biotechnol Appl Biochem 44:19–25. doi:10.1042/BA20050134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Iatsenko I,
    2. Boichenko I,
    3. Sommer RJ
    . 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis DB27 produces two novel protoxins, Cry21Fa1 and Cry21Ha1, which act synergistically against nematodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3266–3275. doi:10.1128/AEM.00464-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wirth MC,
    2. Georghiou GP,
    3. Federici BA
    . 1997. CytA enables CryIV endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CryIV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:10536–10540. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.20.10536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Perez C,
    2. Munoz-Garay C,
    3. Portugal LC,
    4. Sanchez J,
    5. Gill SS,
    6. Soberón M,
    7. Bravo A
    . 2007. Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis Cyt1Aa enhances activity of Cry11Aa toxin by facilitating the formation of a pre-pore oligomeric structure. Cell Microbiol 125:2621–2629. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01007.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Elleuch J,
    2. Jaoua S,
    3. Darriet F,
    4. Chandre F,
    5. Tounsi S,
    6. Zghal RZ
    . 2015. Cry4Ba and Cyt1Aa proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis: interactions and toxicity mechanism against Aedes aegypti. Toxicon 104:83–90. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.07.337.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kaikaew A,
    2. Promptmas C,
    3. Angsuthanasombat C
    . 2016. Importance of Thr328 and Thr369 for functional maintenance of two receptor-binding β-hairpins of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba toxin: implications for synergistic interactions with Cyt2Aa2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 469:698–703. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.115.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tetreau G,
    2. Stalinski R,
    3. David JP,
    4. Després L
    . 2013. Monitoring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in the field by performing bioassays with each Cry toxin separately. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108:894–900. doi:10.1590/0074-0276130155.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Berry C,
    2. O'Neil S,
    3. Ben-Dov E,
    4. Jones AF,
    5. Murphy L,
    6. Quail MA,
    7. Holden MTG,
    8. Harris D,
    9. Zaritsky A,
    10. Parkhill J
    . 2002. Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the toxin-coding plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5082–5095. doi:10.1128/aem.68.10.5082-5095.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hinnekens P,
    2. Koné KM,
    3. Fayad N,
    4. Leprince A,
    5. Mahillon J
    . 2019. pXO16, the large conjugative plasmid from Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis displays an extended host spectrum. Plasmid 102:46–50. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2019.02.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gillis A,
    2. Guo S,
    3. Bolotin A,
    4. Makart L,
    5. Sorokin A,
    6. Mahillon J
    . 2017. Detection of the cryptic prophage-like molecule pBtic235 in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Res Microbiol 168:319–330. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2016.10.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Siguier P,
    2. Gourbeyre E,
    3. Varani A,
    4. Ton-Hoang BAO,
    5. Chandler M
    . 2015. Everyman’s guide to bacterial insertion sequences. Microbiol Spectr 3:MDNA3-0030-2014. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0030-2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Nicolas E,
    2. Lambin M,
    3. Dandoy D,
    4. Galloy C,
    5. Nguyen N,
    6. Oger CA,
    7. Hallet B
    . 2015. The Tn3-family of replicative transposons. Microbiol Spectr 3:MDNA3-0060-2014. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0060-2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mei X,
    2. Xu K,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Yuan Z,
    5. Mahillon J,
    6. Hu X
    . 2014. The genetic diversity of cereulide biosynthesis gene cluster indicates a composite transposon Tnces in emetic Bacillus weihenstephanensis. BMC Microbiol 14:149. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-14-149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ferat J-L,
    2. Michel F
    . 1993. Group II self-splicing introns in bacteria. Nature 364:358–361. doi:10.1038/364358a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kristoffersen SM,
    2. Tourasse NJ,
    3. Kolstø AB,
    4. Økstad OA
    . 2011. Interspersed DNA repeats bcr1–bcr18 of Bacillus cereus group bacteria form three distinct groups with different evolutionary and functional patterns. Mol Biol Evol 28:963–983. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fayad N,
    2. Kallassy Awad M,
    3. Mahillon J
    . 2019. Diversity of Bacillus cereus sensu lato mobilome. BMC Genomics 20:1–11. doi:10.1186/s12864-019-5764-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Fiedoruk K,
    2. Daniluk T,
    3. Mahillon J,
    4. Leszczynska K,
    5. Swiecicka I
    . 2017. Genetic environment of cry1 genes indicates their common origin. Genome Biol Evol 9:2265–2275. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx165.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Leonard C,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Mahillon J
    . 1997. Diversity and differential distribution of IS231, IS232 and IS240 among Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus mycoides. Microbiology 143:2537–2547. doi:10.1099/00221287-143-8-2537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Mahillon J,
    2. Rezsöhazy R,
    3. Hallet B,
    4. Delcour J
    . 1994. IS231 and other Bacillus thuringiensis transposable elements: a review. Genetica 93:13–26. doi:10.1007/BF01435236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Fayad N,
    2. Patiño-Navarrete R,
    3. Kambris Z,
    4. Antoun M,
    5. Osta M,
    6. Chopineau J,
    7. Mahillon J,
    8. El Chamy L,
    9. Sanchis V,
    10. Kallassy Awad M
    . 2019. Characterization and whole genome sequencing of AR23, a highly toxic Bacillus thuringiensis strain isolated from Lebanese soil. Curr Microbiol 76:1503–1511. doi:10.1007/s00284-019-01775-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Carozzi NB,
    2. Kramer VC,
    3. Warren GW,
    4. Evola S,
    5. Koziel MG
    . 1991. Prediction of insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains by polymerase chain reaction product profiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3057–3061. doi:10.1128/AEM.57.11.3057-3061.1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Darling AE,
    2. Mau B,
    3. Perna NT
    . 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Guan P,
    2. Ai P,
    3. Dai X,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Xu L,
    6. Zhu J,
    7. Li Q,
    8. Deng Q,
    9. Li S,
    10. Wang S,
    11. Liu H,
    12. Wang L,
    13. Li P,
    14. Zheng A
    . 2012. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar Sichuansis strain MC28. J Bacteriol 194:6975. doi:10.1128/JB.01861-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Camacho C,
    2. Coulouris G,
    3. Avagyan V,
    4. Ma N,
    5. Papadopoulos J,
    6. Bealer K,
    7. Madden TL
    . 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Geer LY,
    2. Domrachev M,
    3. Lipman DJ,
    4. Bryant SH
    . 2002. CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res 12:1619–1623. doi:10.1101/gr.278202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Soberón M,
    2. Pardo L,
    3. Muñóz-Garay C,
    4. Sánchez J,
    5. Gómez I,
    6. Porta H,
    7. Bravo A
    . 2010. Pore formation by Cry toxins. Adv Exp Med Biol 677:127–142. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6327-7_11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Adalat R,
    2. Saleem F,
    3. Crickmore N,
    4. Naz S,
    5. Shakoori AR
    . 2017. In vivo crystallization of three-domain Cry toxins. Toxins 9:80. doi:10.3390/toxins9030080.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Hernández-Soto A,
    2. Cristina M,
    3. Rincón-Castro D,
    4. Espinoza AM,
    5. Ibarra JE
    . 2009. Parasporal body formation via overexpression of the Cry10Aa toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and Cry10Aa-Cyt1Aa synergism. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4661–4667. doi:10.1128/AEM.00409-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Gaspari M,
    2. Cuda G
    . 2011. Nano LC-MS/MS: a robust setup for proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol 790:115–126. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-319-6_9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Gillis A,
    2. Fayad N,
    3. Makart L,
    4. Bolotin A,
    5. Sorokin A,
    6. Kallassy M,
    7. Mahillon J
    . 2018. Role of plasmid plasticity and mobile genetic elements in the entomopathogen Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:829–856. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. Knizewski L,
    2. Kinch LN,
    3. Grishin NV,
    4. Rychlewski L,
    5. Ginalski K
    . 2007. Realm of PD-(D/E)XK nuclease superfamily revisited: detection of novel families with modified transitive meta profile searches. BMC Struct Biol 7:40. doi:10.1186/1472-6807-7-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Steczkiewicz K,
    2. Muszewska A,
    3. Knizewski L,
    4. Rychlewski L,
    5. Ginalski K
    . 2012. Sequence, structure and functional diversity of PD-(D/E)XK phosphodiesterase superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res 40:7016–7045. doi:10.1093/nar/gks382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Tourasse NJ,
    2. Kolstø AB
    . 2008. Survey of group I and group II introns in 29 sequenced genomes of the Bacillus cereus group: insights into their spread and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 36:4529–4548. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ireton K,
    2. Gunther NW, IV,
    3. Grossman AD
    . 1994. spo0J is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 176:5320–5329. doi:10.1128/jb.176.17.5320-5329.1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lozano Goné AM,
    2. Dinorín Téllez Girón J,
    3. Jiménez Montejo FE,
    4. Hidalgo-Lara ME,
    5. López y López VE
    . 2014. Behavior of transition state regulator AbrB in batch cultures of Bacillus thuringiensis. Curr Microbiol 69:725–732. doi:10.1007/s00284-014-0650-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Park HW,
    2. Pino BC,
    3. Kozervanich-Chong S,
    4. Hafkenscheid EA,
    5. Oliverio RM,
    6. Federici BA,
    7. Bideshi DK
    . 2013. Cyt1Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis enhances mosquitocidal activity of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 against Aedes aegypti but not Culex quinquefasciatus. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:88–91. doi:10.4014/jmb.1207.07061.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Pérez C,
    2. Fernandez LE,
    3. Sun J,
    4. Folch JL,
    5. Gill SS,
    6. Soberón M,
    7. Bravo A
    . 2005. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cyt1Aa synergizes Cry11Aa toxin by functioning as a membrane-bound receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18303–18308. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505494102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Cohen S,
    2. Albeck S,
    3. Ben-Dov E,
    4. Cahan R,
    5. Firer M,
    6. Zaritsky A,
    7. Dym O
    . 2011. Cyt1Aa toxin: crystal structure reveals implications for its membrane-perforating function. J Mol Biol 413:804–814. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Guan P,
    2. Dai X,
    3. Zhu J,
    4. Li Q,
    5. Li S,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Li P,
    8. Zheng A
    . 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. sichuansis strain MC28 produces a novel crystal protein with activity against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:1417–1421. doi:10.1007/s11274-013-1548-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Baek I,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Goodfellow M,
    4. Chun J
    . 2019. Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analyses clarify relationships within and between Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis: proposal for the recognition of two Bacillus thuringiensis genomovars. Front Microbiol 10:1978. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01978.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Barboza-Corona JE,
    2. Park H-W,
    3. Bideshi DK,
    4. Federici BA
    . 2012. The 60-kilodalton protein encoded by orf2 in the cry19A operon of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan functions like a C-terminal crystallization domain. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2005–2012. doi:10.1128/AEM.06750-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Zhao Q,
    3. Xia L,
    4. Ding X,
    5. Hu Q,
    6. Federici BA,
    7. Park H-W
    . 2013. Identification and characterization of three previously undescribed crystal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3364–3370. doi:10.1128/AEM.00078-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Sajid M,
    2. Geng C,
    3. Li M,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Zheng J,
    7. Peng D,
    8. Sun M
    . 2018. Whole-genome analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis revealing partial genes as a source of novel Cry toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00277-18. doi:10.1128/AEM.00277-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Peng D-H,
    2. Pang CY,
    3. Wu H,
    4. Huang Q,
    5. Zheng JS,
    6. Sun M
    . 2015. The expression and crystallization of Cry65Aa require two C-termini, revealing a novel evolutionary strategy of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins. Sci Rep 5:8291. doi:10.1038/srep08291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Manasherob R,
    2. Zaritsky A,
    3. Ben-Dov E,
    4. Saxena D,
    5. Barak Z,
    6. Einav M
    . 2001. Effect of accessory proteins P19 and P20 on cytolytic activity of Cyt1Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 43:355–364. doi:10.1007/s002840010316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Mahillon J,
    2. Seurinck J,
    3. van Rompuy L,
    4. Delcour J,
    5. Zabeau M
    . 1985. Nucleotide sequence and structural organization of an insertion sequence element (IS231) from Bacillus thuringiensis strain berliner 1715. EMBO J 4:3895–3899. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04163.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Patino-Navarrete R,
    2. Sanchis V
    . 2017. Evolutionary processes and environmental factors underlying the genetic diversity and lifestyles of Bacillus cereus group bacteria. Res Microbiol 168:309–318. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2016.07.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Lechuga A,
    2. Lood C,
    3. Salas M,
    4. van Noort V,
    5. Lavigne R,
    6. Redrejo-Rodríguez M
    . 2020. Completed genomic sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis HER1410 reveals a Cry-containing chromosome, two megaplasmids, and an integrative plasmidial prophage. G3 (Bethesda) 10:2927–2939. doi:10.1534/g3.120.401361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Caulier S,
    2. Nannan C,
    3. Gillis A,
    4. Licciardi F,
    5. Bragard C,
    6. Mahillon J
    . 2019. Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Front Microbiol 10:302. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00302.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. Wenzel M,
    2. Rautenbach M,
    3. Vosloo JA,
    4. Siersma T,
    5. Aisenbrey CHM,
    6. Zaitseva E,
    7. Laubscher WE,
    8. Van Rensburg W,
    9. Behrends JC,
    10. Bechinger B,
    11. Hamoen LW
    . 2018. The multifaceted antibacterial mechanisms of the pioneering peptide antibiotics tyrocidine and gramicidin S. mBio 9:e00802-18. doi:10.1128/mBio.00802-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Gomaa EZ
    . 2012. Chitinase production by Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus licheniformis: their potential in antifungal biocontrol. J Microbiol 50:103–111. doi:10.1007/s12275-012-1343-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    1. Malovichko YV,
    2. Nizhnikov AA,
    3. Antonets KS
    . 2019. Repertoire of the Bacillus thuringiensis virulence factors unrelated to major classes of protein toxins and its role in specificity of host-pathogen interactions. Toxins 11:347. doi:10.3390/toxins11060347.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. 68.↵
    1. Tan S,
    2. Moore G,
    3. Nodwell J
    . 2019. Put a bow on it: knotted antibiotics take center stage. Antibiotics 8:117. doi:10.3390/antibiotics8030117.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. 69.↵
    1. Travers RS,
    2. Martin PAW,
    3. Reichelderfer CF
    . 1987. Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1263–1266. doi:10.1128/AEM.53.6.1263-1266.1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. El Khoury M,
    2. Azzouz H,
    3. Chavanieu A,
    4. Abdelmalak N,
    5. Chopineau J,
    6. Kallassy Awad M
    . 2014. Isolation and characterization of a new Bacillus thuringiensis strain Lip harboring a new cry1Aa gene highly toxic to Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae. Arch Microbiol 196:435–445. doi:10.1007/s00203-014-0981-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    1. Bradford MM
    . 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Andrup L,
    2. Barfod KK,
    3. Jensen GB,
    4. Smidt L
    . 2008. Detection of large plasmids from the Bacillus cereus group. Plasmid 59:139–143. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.11.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Bushnell B
    . 2016. BBMap short-read aligner, and other bioinformatics tools. https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/.
  74. 74.↵
    1. Seemann T
    . 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    1. Seppey M,
    2. Manni M,
    3. Zdobnov EM
    . 2019. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol 1962:227–245. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Kumar S,
    2. Stecher G,
    3. Li M,
    4. Knyaz C,
    5. Tamura K
    . 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Ye W,
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Crickmore N,
    5. Peng D,
    6. Ruan L,
    7. Sun M
    . 2012. Mining new crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis on the basis of mixed plasmid-enriched genome sequencing and a computational pipeline. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4795–4801. doi:10.1128/AEM.00340-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 78.↵
    1. Blin K,
    2. Shaw S,
    3. Steinke K,
    4. Villebro R,
    5. Ziemert N,
    6. Lee SY,
    7. Medema MH,
    8. Weber T
    . 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Rahbani Mounsef J,
    2. Salameh D,
    3. Kallassy Awad M,
    4. Chamy L,
    5. Brandam C,
    6. Lteif R
    . 2014. A simple method for the separation of Bacillus thuringiensis spores and crystals. J Microbiol Methods 107:147–149. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2014.10.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.↵
    1. Ibarra JE,
    2. del Rincón MC,
    3. Ordúz S,
    4. Noriega D,
    5. Benintende G,
    6. Monnerat R,
    7. Regis L,
    8. de Oliveira CMF,
    9. Lanz H,
    10. Rodriguez MH,
    11. Sánchez J,
    12. Peña G,
    13. Bravo A
    . 2003. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Latin America with insecticidal activity against different mosquito species. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5269–5274. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.9.5269-5274.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Novel Antidipteran Bacillus thuringiensis Strain: Unusual Cry Toxin Genes in a Highly Dynamic Plasmid Environment
Nancy Fayad, Zakaria Kambris, Laure El Chamy, Jacques Mahillon, Mireille Kallassy Awad
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2021, 87 (5) e02294-20; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02294-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Antidipteran Bacillus thuringiensis Strain: Unusual Cry Toxin Genes in a Highly Dynamic Plasmid Environment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Novel Antidipteran Bacillus thuringiensis Strain: Unusual Cry Toxin Genes in a Highly Dynamic Plasmid Environment
Nancy Fayad, Zakaria Kambris, Laure El Chamy, Jacques Mahillon, Mireille Kallassy Awad
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Feb 2021, 87 (5) e02294-20; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02294-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus thuringiensis
Cry toxins
insertion sequences
large plasmids
mosquitocidal
transposable elements

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336