Table 3.

Weighted Pearson product-moment correlation coefficientsa

Data set 1bData set 2br1.2c99% Confidence intervalc
AL-Cy5 slide 15AL-Cy5 slide 210.81580.6567–0.9054
AL-Cy5 slide 15AL-Cy5 slide 350.76830.5777–0.8795
AL-Cy5 slide 15AL-Cy5 slide 450.78740.6090–0.8900
AL-Cy5 slide 21AL-Cy5 slide 350.87550.7612–0.9371
AL-Cy5 slide 21AL-Cy5 slide 450.88160.7722–0.9403
AL-Cy5 slide 35AL-Cy5 slide 450.97290.9454–0.9867
AL-Cy3 slide 15AL-Cy3 slide 210.69110.4565–0.8359
AL-Cy3 slide 15AL-Cy3 slide 350.67990.4400–0.8294
AL-Cy3 slide 15AL-Cy3 slide 450.66530.4177–0.8208
AL-Cy3 slide 21AL-Cy3 slide 350.73020.5168–0.8582
AL-Cy3 slide 21AL-Cy3 slide 450.77380.5866–0.8825
AL-Cy3 slide 35AL-Cy3 slide 450.98810.9759–0.9942
AR slide 15AR slide 210.80380.6363–0.8989
AR slide 15AR slide 350.73830.5396–0.8627
AR slide 15AR slide 450.66270.4140–0.8194
AR slide 21AR slide 350.73120.5183–0.8587
AR slide 21AR slide 450.63940.3800–0.8056
AR slide 35AR slide 450.94950.8995–0.9750
  • a df = n − 2 = 53 ; P0.01 = 0.354 . The 99% confidence limits (t0.01[∞] = 2.275) were set to each rxy using the z transformation.

  • b Slides 15 and 21 were hybridized with cDNAs from one set of reverse transcriptions; slides 35 and 45 were hybridized with cDNAs from the second set of reverse transcriptions.

  • c P < 0.01 .