TABLE 2.

UniFrac P valuesa

SampleCompared sample(s) (P value)
SRU1SNU3 (0.118), STU2 (0.111)
STU2SNU3 (0.201), SRU1 (0.111), SNU5 (0.066), SNU6 (0.107)
SNU3SNU6 (0.802), SNU7 (0.070), SRU1 (0.118), STU2 (0.201)
SNC4WTC11 (0.105), SNU5 (0.053)
SNU5SNC4 (0.053), STU2 (0.066)
SNU6SNU7 (0.394), SNU3 (0.802), STU2 (0.107)
SNU7SNU6 (0.394), SNU3 (0.070)
WRU8
WTC9WTC11 (0.639), INU20 (0.076), INC19 (0.155), INU18 (0.097)
WTU10
WTC11SNC4 (0.105), WTC9 (0.639), INC19 (0.055)
WTU12
WPU13WPU14 (0.238)
WPU14WPU13 (0.238)
INC15
IRU16INU18 (0.257)
IRC17
INU18WTC9 (0.097), INU20 (0.055), INC19 (0.233), IRC17 (0.257)
INC19WTC11 (0.055), WTC9 (0.155), INU18 (0.233)
INU20WTC9 (0.076), INU18 (0.055)
  • a UniFrac P values were based on comparisons to 1,000 randomized trees. Results are listed only if the P value (listed in parentheses) is ≥0.05. All other pairwise comparisons indicated that the communities were significantly different.